20.8.11

USA permanent bases in Afghanistan.

.
.
.
.
A long term MILITARIST based American occupation of Afghanistan, with NATO in toe constitutes a significant security threat to Pakistan, Iran, South Asia, China, Central Asia and of course Russia. All must work together to persuade the Americans to leave Afghanistan permanently via the SCO.

____________________________

Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com

Ben Farmer, writing for The Telegraph on Friday, reported that the U.S. and Afghanistan have reached an agreement that would allow American special forces and air force to remain in the country until 2024. The agreement arrives as the United States claims it will pack up and leave by the end of 2014.

In December of 2009, during a speech delivered at West Point, Obama said troops would begin leaving Afghanistan. Prior to the speech, the Pentagon said it would send an additional 30,000 troops as part of a “mini-surge.” NATO was asked to send between 5,000 and 10,000 troops as part of an international force. In early 2010, the Pentagon increased substantially its “new civilian forces” outside of Kabul, according to ABC News.

Afghanistan’s hand-picked president, Hamid Karzai, confirmed earlier this year that the United States plans to establish permanent bases in his country. “Yes they want this (permanent bases) and we have been negotiating with them,” Karzai said at a press conference in his presidential palace in February. “We believe that a long-term relationship with the United States is in the interest of Afghanistan.”

The deal was negotiated without the participation or approval of the Afghan parliament or the grand tribal council known as the Loya Jirga.

The plan announced last week was peddled as part of the effort to train the Afghan military and police. “If [the Americans] provide us weapons and equipment, they need facilities to bring that equipment,” said Rangin Dadfar Spanta, Karzai’s top security adviser. “If they train our police and soldiers, then those trainers will not be 10 or 20, they will be thousands.”

The continued U.S. presence at numerous bases in Afghanistan is central to the generational war planned to fight against so-called international terrorism, itself a creation of U.S. and British intelligence. “We know we will be confronted with international terrorists. 2014, is not the end of international terrorist networks and we have a common commitment to fight them. For this purpose also, the US needs facilities,” said Spanta.

Andrey Avetisyan, Russian ambassador to Kabul, told The Telegraph permanent U.S. bases should not be required. “I don’t understand why such bases are needed. If the job is done, if terrorism is defeated and peace and stability is brought back, then why would you need bases?” he asked. “If the job is not done, then several thousand troops, even special forces, will not be able to do the job that 150,000 troops couldn’t do. It is not possible.”

(Rather strange given the Russian ambassadors rational considered position, and presumably a view that is also held by his government in Moscow. Why is Russia helping the American occupation forces in Afghanistan with logistics through Russia/Turkmenistan when there is a massive heroin epidemic in Russia with annual deaths in the 10,000 of thousands, crime soaring relating to drugs and huge medical costs, and social costs.....which are clearly attributable to the Afghan heroin, which is a business managed by the Anglo-American troops in Afghanistan.

Or if you like the "New Opium Wars in the 21st century part II".

One clearly understands the Jewish Oligarchical control of Russia takes precedence in state policy to a certain degree, but surely on the basis of national survival and self interests........the Russian government needs to take stronger action against the occupation of Afghanistan by the USA, the real intention of which is spelled out by Brzezinski himself no less,....and is thus also aimed militarily against Russia.......one is baffled as to why KGB/martial arts expert PUTIN is so PASSIVE in relation to the growing menace of the USA/NATO in Afghanistan, and the long term implications of this for Central Asia and Russia it self........China at a very minimum has said no to the USA, when they were approached in 2009 to allow supplies through China for the occupation forces in Afghanistan. Kirghistan will end its supply cooperation in 2014.

Why cannot KGB ultra patriotic Putin with the tough guy martial arts image coordinate a Central Asian + Russia blockade of the occupation forces in Afghanistan? )

The deal (permanent American military bases airlifting drugs out of the country) is designed to continue the engineered conflict in Afghanistan.

The Taliban have said they will not negotiate peace with the government in Kabul until all U.S. troops have left the country. According to Abdul Hakim Mujahid, deputy leader of the “peace” council set up by Karzai to seek a settlement with the Taliban, the deal to keep a substantial number of U.S. troops in the country will intensify the insurgency.

In 2010, Pakistani president Asif Ali Zardari said the Taliban was created by the CIA and ISI, the Pakistan intelligence agency.

He also said the Pentagon is orchestrating Taliban attacks.

(IN Pakistan also......through the ISI. So in simple terms American soldiers are dying in Afghanistan because of the actions of American security who work for certain elites in the West who profit from arms sales from conducting indefinite wars, and the Afghan opium which is worth about $50-80 billion annually to such criminalized elites)

Most Afghans believe the U.S. is funding and supporting the Taliban in order to continue the war and occupation of their country.

“The US uses Israel to threaten the Arab states, and they want to make Afghanistan into the same thing,” a highly educated Afghan professional told The Guardian in May of 2010.

For more detail, see Afghans: U.S. Created and Funds Taliban.

Jimmy Carter’s national security adviser and Rockefeller globalist Zbigniew Brzezinski argued in his book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, that controlling Eurasia is essential to the global pre-eminence of the elite. “It is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America,” he writes (by “America,” Brzezinski means the global elite represented by the CFR and the Trilateral Commission).

(meaning China and a resurgent Russia)

The Taliban originated from from Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-run religious schools for Afghan refugees in Pakistan following the CIA’s war against the Soviet Union. Selig Harrison from the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars has admitted that the CIA created the Taliban. Harrison is an expert on Asian affairs and has had extensive contact with the CIA and political leaders in South Asia. He is closely aligned with the globalists through the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

The anti-Soviet Mujahideen that provided recruits for the Taliban was aided by the CIA, a fact admitted by its former director, Robert Gates. The secret plan to create the Mujahideen prior to the invasion of the country was “was an excellent idea,” according to Brzezinski. “What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?” he told Le Nouvel Observateur in 1998.

The Pentagon will not leave Afghanistan in 2024. It plans to stay there forever and operate as a “muscle-man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers,” as former Marine Major General Smedley Butler said in 1933, referring to his work for them in the Philippines, China, and Latin America.