20.11.11

Syria Western re-colonization through "al-Qaeda"

.
.
.
.
Iran must sell Syrian embargoed oil and give ALL the sales proceeds to the Syrian government, via Iraq.

Iran must provide security assistance to Syria, in the region of $1 billion annually.

The Russians have docked their navy in Syrian harbors to show support for the regime, AND so Iran must do the same by sending units of the Pasdaran to Syria to defend the regime.

Since an attack on Syria using "al-Qaeda" is ultimately directed against Iran militarily, then both Russia and Iran must defend Syria militarily with greater military/security cooperation with the country.

It is logical for Syria to back anti-Turkish insurgency groups as a response to the Turkish assistance of "al-Qaeda' terrorists from sovereign Turkish territory.

Greater propaganda should be highlighted of the fact that Turkey is a NATO member, is a country dominated by Doenme Jews and that the Turkish State maintains close relations with Israel.

Destabilization efforts should be considered against Turkey, using societal difficulties within the country by Russia and Syria, but not Iran.

Efforts should be made to prevent Doenme Erdogan from winning the next election along with Davidloo. Alternative parties must be funded such as Erbakan's which do not favour following Israel's orders.

Turkey can chase Europe for ever, but in pursuing that Sisyphean process it should not turnaround and harm otherwise peaceful friendly neighbors, acting as a whore of the International Jewish bankers.

The Turkish State naturally gains nothing economically, socially, politically or security wise by having an "al-Qaeda" regime in charge in Syria, Libya, Egypt or Tunisia......such occurrences only excite a few flaky nutjobs in Western security in Washington, Herzilya and Londonistan.

_______________________


International Institute for Strategic Studies: Syria's Opposition Is Armed

Placard-Waving Protesters are actually Machine Gun-Wielding Terrorists.
by Tony Cartalucci at Land Destroyer Report blogspot.com and Information Clearing House.

The "Free Syria Army" is literally an army of militant extremists, many drawn not from Syria's military ranks, but from the Muslim Brotherhood, carrying heavy weapons back and forth over the Turkish and Lebanese borders, funded, supported, and armed by the United States, Israel, and Turkey. The latest evidence confirming this comes in the form of a report out of the International Institute for Strategic Studies where Senior Fellow for Regional Security at IISS-Middle East Emile Hokayem openly admits Syria's opposition is armed and prepared to drag Syria's violence into even bloodier depths.

This report comes in sharp contrast to the propaganda fed via the corporate-media and the West's foreign ministers on a daily basis, where the violence is portrayed as one-sided, with Syria's President Bashar al-Assad "gunning down" throngs of peaceful, placard waving protesters. Just as in Libya where these so-called "peaceful protesters" turned out to be hordes of genocidal racist Al Qaeda mercenaries, led by big-oil representatives, fighting their cause upon a verified pack of lies, so too is Syria's "pro-democracy" movement which is slowly being revealed as yet another militant brand of extremists long cultivated by Anglo-American intelligence agencies, whose leadership is harbored in London and Washington and their foot soldiers supplied a steady stream of covert military support and overt rhetorical support throughout the compromised corporate media.

The unrest in Syria from the beginning was entirely backed by Western corporate-financier interests and part of a long-planned agenda for region-wide regime change. Syria has been slated for regime change since as early as 1991. In 2002, then US Under Secretary of State John Bolton added Syria to the growing "Axis of Evil." It would be later revealed that Bolton's threats against Syria manifested themselves as covert funding and support for opposition groups inside of Syria spanning both the Bush and Obama administrations.

In an April 2011 CNN article, acting State Department spokesman Mark Toner stated, "We're not working to undermine that [Syrian] government. What we are trying to do in Syria, through our civil society support, is to build the kind of democratic institutions, frankly, that we're trying to do in countries around the globe. What's different, I think, in this situation is that the Syrian government perceives this kind of assistance as a threat to its control over the Syrian people."

Toner's remarks came after the Washington Post released cables indicating the US has been funding Syrian opposition groups since at least 2005 and continued until today.

In an April AFP report, Michael Posner, the assistant US Secretary of State for Human Rights and Labor, stated that the "US government has budgeted $50 million in the last two years to develop new technologies to help activists protect themselves from arrest and prosecution by authoritarian governments." The report went on to explain that the US "organized training sessions for 5,000 activists in different parts of the world. A session held in the Middle East about six weeks ago gathered activists from Tunisia, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon who returned to their countries with the aim of training their colleagues there." Posner would add, "They went back and there's a ripple effect." That ripple effect of course is the "Arab Spring," and in Syria's case, the impetus for the current unrest threatening to unhinge the nation and invite in foreign intervention.

With planted "speculation" running through the corporate media that a recent explosion, amongst several other "incidents" in Iran, were the work of Western covert operations, and the Jerusalem Post all but admitting the entire Western-backed destabilization in Syria aims not at ushering in "democracy" or upholding "human rights," but to weaken Iran by proxy, it is clear that everything within Wall Street and London's power is being done to provoke Iran. Iran has downplayed the recent explosion at their military base as an accident and has thus far maintained a persistent patience in the face of criminal provocations and overt acts of war by an alarmingly and increasingly depraved West.

It is quite clear that the stratagems spelled out in the corporate-funded Brookings Institute report "Which Path to Persia?" have been read and understood by both sides and that Iran realizes that any act of retaliation not expertly played, only gives the West what it has stated it wants - an excuse to go to war with the Islamic Republic. Should the public in Syria, Iran, and throughout the West also read "Which Path to Persia?" and realize that the only threat Iran and its allies pose to the West is toward the extraterritorial ambitions of Wall Street and London, perhaps a bloody, entirely unnecessary war can be avoided, and the first steps taken toward dismantling the parasitic corporate-financier oligarchy that has misled the world for the past several decades.