Sep 28, 2011

More evidence that Iran is run by Israel and London

.
.
.
.
Why not send the Great Persian navy up the Thames? After all the British have been in the Persian Gulf for at least 200 years creating artificial nations out of greater nations, and turning these small nations into petrol stations and military bases for their military. British personnel have been caught many times illegally wondering into Persian territory.

Why not send the Great Persian navy near Israel to give support to the Palestinians.......provocative and unwise as it may be, whilst Iran sells itself as a peaceful responsible power to the world which can be trusted. After all Israel has several German made submarines in the Persian Gulf, near Iran armed with Missiles. The Israelis after all are in Northern Iraq training and arming the PKK/PJAK terrorists against Iran.

But I suppose when you have many secret Jews running mullah Iran, we must look the other way when it comes to Israeli crimes against Iran. Ahmedinejad the Jew must only make firey speeches against Israel in the UN. The Jew runs the JEWSA. The Jew is the only one which lusts after war against Iran, using the USA. The Jew in London lusts after war and aggression in Iran.

When a weak power which only spends 3% of GDP on defense postures militarily, it is considered "provocative". When a superpower postures militarily near other nations it has just threatened, this is considered normal.

This is how it is.

Protecting Iran means, protecting Iran's landmass effectively using the army and air-force. Protecting Iran does NOT mean sending the navy into the Atlantic. This is pure politicking.....with sloganism for the benefit of Israel's and London Jewish geo-strategic perceptions and needs.

Nazi Germany (1933--45) was also run by the Jews using secret Jews who made firey speeches against the Jew, whilst simultaneously helping to create a purely Zionist/Jewish State in Palestine (Adolf Eichmann, a Jew, being the principle liaison officer). The head of German Intelligence, Admiral Canaris worked for the international Jews. The International Jew knew about ALL German military operations in advance, on top of the fact that the enigma machine had been deciphered. Secret Jews within Nazi Germany ran the rest of the Nazi Jewish vaudeville, and in harming the nation....where 10 million ethnic Germans died within/without Germany between 1939--1948, and permanently occupied by other Jewish run powers.....to this day.

Mullah Iran displays shades of the old Nazi Germany Jewish run vaudeville game.

___________________________

Iran Could Deploy Navy Near US Coast, Says Iranian Official

The announcement explicitly mentions reciprocating years of provocative US militarism around Iran

by John Glaser, at antiwar.com

Iran plans to send military ships close to the United States’ Atlantic coast, according to the head of the Iranian Navy, Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari.

US Navy warships in the Persian Gulf

“Like the arrogant powers that are present near our marine borders, we will also have a powerful presence close to American marine borders, Sayyari said on Tuesday without giving specifics as to when such a deployment could happen or the number or type of vessels to be used.

For years the United States has patrolled a fleet of Navy warships off the Iranian coast in the Persian Gulf, something seen as threatening to Tehran. In January of last year, the Obama administration accelerated the deployment of military vessels off the Iranian coast and placed antimissile systems in at least four Arab countries neighboring Iran.

Most notable is the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet based in Bahrain – less than 160 miles off the Iranian coast – which directs operations in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, and Arabian Sea and secures the Straits of Hormuz, through which 40 per cent of the world’s seaborne oil passes. It is one of the largest military forces in the region, with over 40 vessels and close to 30,000 personnel.

The Fifth Fleet consists of a Carrier Battle Group, which includes an aircraft carrier, two guided missile cruisers equipped with Tomahawks for long-range strike capability, a guided missile destroyer for air warfare, a destroyer for submarine warfare, a frigate, two attack submarines, and a combined ammunition, oiler and supply ship. The Fifth Fleet also docks an Amphibious Ready Group, which consists of multiple other vessels including aircraft carriers, attack helicopters, a Marine Air-Ground Task Force, and more.

These and other US Navy warships patrol the waterways along Iran’s southern border on a daily basis, often with the explicit intention of provoking Iran. In 2007, the Bush administration deployed “the largest daytime assembly of US warships in the Gulf since the 2003 Iraq war to hold drills off Iran’s coast in a major U.S. show of force.” The assembly included about 17,000 personnel and 140 aircraft in addition to the usual, and was sent without notifying the Iranian government.

President Obama’s analogous show of force last year was described by the New York Times as ”part of a coordinated administration strategy to increase pressure on Iran” and also “intended to counter the impression that Iran is fast becoming the most powerful military force in the Middle East.”

The announcement by the Iranian Navy official comes weeks after the US got Turkey to agree to host a NATO anti-ballistic system aimed at spotting missiles coming from Iran. Turkey had agreed to the deal with the explicit condition that its neighbor Iran not be named as the impetus, strongly suggesting Iran was the primary target.

This demonstrates another aspect important to the context of US militaristic provocation towards Iran. Aside from warships to Iran’s south, the US makes major arms deals and sends significant amounts of security assistance to nearly all of Iran’s neighboring countries including Turkey, Kuwait, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, not to mention the two hot wars and client states the US is engaged in directly to Iran’s east and west in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Iran’s supposed plan to place navy vessels somewhere near America’s Atlantic coast, as the official who announced it said explicitly, is merely a response to the decades worth of US militaristic provocation towards Iran. Some in the US are objecting strongly to this, seeming implicitly to state that America doesn’t have to abide by the same rules Iran does and that America should not have to accept the obvious repercussions of aggressive foreign policies.

(photo via Wikipedia)

Posted by at
Labels:

Sep 24, 2011

faggotty situation in Af/Pak

.
.
.
.
The USA and Pakistan created the Taliban in 1994, following "Operation Cyclone" and Brzezinski's plan to destabilize the region with Islamists from the late 1970's.

The USA continued its relationship with the Islamists, thereafter, using them especially in the Balkans and other theaters.

The 40,000 Taliban in 2001 were armed, supplied, trained and directed by the Pakistan military for the USA. Their performance in battle was extremely poor, given that they were a militia armed with light equipment.

After Israel conducted 9/11, the USA falsely decided to invade Afghanistan, under the pretext that "al-Qaeda", a non-existent phantom group run by the USA, and OBL had carried it out.

Yes indeed there were thousands of Jihadis/Islamists in Afghanistan before 9/11, trained by the Pakistanis for the USA, BUT they were not led by one leader.......accepting OBL as their undisputed leader, nor with a plan for global Jihad. Young misguided men from the Greater Middle East went there to train and fight during the 1980--1990's and ended up being USED as pawns in the agenda's of the Jewish run USA.........in Afghanistan, in Kashmir, in the Balkans and of course in the Greater Middle East, and with the recent "Arab Spring" in Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

This is the first faggotty fact that one needs to grasp, before trying to understand the faggotty situation in Af/Pak.

Since then after 2001 Afghanistan mysteriously has become the number 1 Opium/Heroin exporter in the world.

Or to put it another way, the foreign Western occupation forces are able to attack wedding celebrations and other such suspicious gatherings in Afghanistan with great precision year in year out for 10 years, killing thousands upon thousands of civilians with wild careless abandon, but are somehow incapacitated to irradiate Opium poppy growing through days and nights, week on week, months after months, year after year in the open, flat, satellite monitored fields of that wretched country.

To seek clarity of this faggotty fact one must turn to history as it sometimes repeats itself. The East India Company, run by private individuals with connections to establishment figures and protected by the British army, grew Opium in India and exported it to China. This is what is happening with Afghanistan now except the exports of Opium/Heroin these days is to Pakistan, parts of India, Iran, Central Asia, Russia, Ukraine, EU and North America.

The retail value of this trade is between $50--80 billion, just out of Afghanistan. The business is run by the Western military in a controlling position in Afghanistan. The money is laundered in the big banks of London and New York. A few mainly Jewish individuals and their dumb-fuck WASP minions benefit from this criminal activity..........whilst millions of Americans, British, Europeans, Russians, Ukrainians, Central Asians, Iranians, Pakistanis ....................SUFFER from this Jew run International trade worth globally about $600--1,000 billion annually.

This is the faggotty fact, but obviously Panetta and Mullen who are believed to be gentiles can hardly admit to the media that the USA is in Afghanistan purely so that the Opium can be safely harvested, at an annual cost to the American taxpayer of $100 billion OFFICIALLY, so that the Jew banks can launder the money, which forms a major part of their annual profits.

So over the years strange cock and bull stories have emanated from the USA (and the UK) as to why the Western unpopular occupation forces, who kill so many innocent civilians must stay to help the Afghans build a secure democracy, and fight the noble fight against the Taliban, created by the USA, run by the Pakistan military for the USA as "Controlled Opposition".

The real villain of the piece is of course the Pakistan military. Without the cooperation of the Pakistan military the USA would never have had the chance to occupy Afghanistan, and now kill countless Pakistani civilians from Afghanistan.

The Pakistan military still run the Afghan Taliban for the USA, provide them with sanctuary in the border areas, and R & R in Karachi. This is a fact the Americans know, after all the Americans pay for and run Pakistan's Intelligence service the ISI, through various fusion centers and at many other levels.

The Americans "need" the Taliban to sell the occupation and permanent "war" in Afghanistan, and the vast bloated failed state Pentagon budget.

80% of the Occupation troops are killed by the Taliban or Afghan's in uniform who are outraged by foreigners running amok in their country, but the other 20% are killed by the Occupation forces themselves for particular agenda's.........This is the foggy faggotty fact mess of Af/Pak..........where the Coolie Kuta Chamar Chamcha's, themselves victims of terrorism and 35,000 dead since 2001, and the loss of $70 billion to the failed State economy suddenly become the accused......perhaps serves them right for being such good, easily disposable servants of the whimsical USA?

The JEWSA is not yet the Soviet Union, though the International Jew is working hard at it, with FEMA concentration camps built secretly which are capable of holding up to 20 million people, mass arrest dry runs, and 2.5 million citizens of the "Land of the Free and brave" already in prison within the existing American gulag, and ofcourse Police State laws and security agencies which purportedly work days and nights to keep America safe, but in REALITY the same laws are inverted and directed against all Americans.

However unlike the Jewish run Soviet Union where the loss of 30 million people between 1941--45 is converted, and brain washed, and celebrated yearly as, "The Great Patriotic War".....in the Democratic USA, the loss of ANY American lives in combat still have to be explained by the Jewish run state, and not merely explained away as another unfortunate, inevitable Stalinist statistic......"The death of one person is unfortunate, the death of a million is a mere statistic". Creative ways have been conjured up by the devious Jew to avoid this fact.....but still in America most people question, and debate the unnecessary loss of life in Afghanistan. When there is a hike in combat deaths, the devious Jew gets nervous, and strange explanations are THUS PRODUCED, as as the one posted below.

__________________________

Pakistan Challenges US to Prove Allegations

Warns US Not to Invade Tribal Areas

by Jason Ditz at antiwar.com

Tensions between the US and Pakistan appear to have reached a boiling point today, with Admiral Michael Mullen accusing the Haqqani Network of being a “veritable arm” of the Pakistani military’s spy agency, and claimed Pakistan had direct involvement in the attack on the US embassy in Kabul.

Interior Minister Rehman Malik was quick to respond, saying that if the US was going to persist with such accusations they ought to provide some sort of evidence. He also added that if the US wanted Pakistan to move against the Haqqanis they should provide them the intelligence on their locations.

Malik also warned the US not to invade, following repeated US comments suggesting a ground operation may be in the offing, saying that Pakistan would “not allow the boots on our ground, never” and that cooperation with the US would continue so long as Pakistan’s sovereignty is respected.

The Obama Administration has dramatically ratcheted up the rhetoric with respect to the Haqqani Network over the past several weeks, dismissing public claims of responsibility for terrorist attacks by the Afghan Taliban to claim that they were secretly Haqqani plots. Though this first moved toward claims Pakistan wasn’t invading its own tribal areas often enough, it seems to have morphed into elaborate accusations of Pakistan as a state sponsor of terror.
Posted by at
Labels:

Just because London wants to hog the control and manipulation of the puppet mullahs does not mean the USA should completely shut itself out of Iran

.
.
.
.
This is an area I have written about many times before, but as yet nothing logical and adult has evolved in this area.

With China the USA re-opened diplomatic relations after a break of 23 years, through the intermediary services of Pakistan, and the Communist Jew Sinophiles residing within the USA administration with links to the Mao regime.

With Iran the diplomatic break has been 32 years, and there are no signs that Iran and the USA will resume normal diplomatic relations any time soon. This is as a result of the efforts of the Jews in the USA, and Israel who wish the USA instead to attack Iran militarily based on the fact that the country according to the Jews is an existential threat to Israel.

The ever paranoid Jew given their history and basic psychology feel weak and insecure about Persia.

This is a pity that the USA and Iran do not have diplomatic relations after so many years. Mature modern States should try and get along, and move on from the problems and shortcomings of the past.

However on the other hand if having no American embassy in Tehran means no "Arab Spring" then perhaps the present immature situation is not such an unfavorable outcome for Iran and the USA.

If there were no American embassy in Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and Syria coordinating opposition to the various dictatorships in these countries, then there wouldn't be no destabilization of such countries.....along with agent provocateurs of various Western backgrounds. Iran has very reasonably released the Jewish backpackers who strayed into Iran without legal permission, which suggests the country is alert to any such USA games. Iran has few foreign NGO's operating in the country. Iran's security apparatus is recruited and trained locally, and is not reliant on the West, unlike Tunisia and Egypt.

On the other hand if your country is the only one country out of 200 that has mullahs running it, then that is a situation not to be particularly happy about, to put it mildly.

After 444 days the 52 American hostages in Tehran were released after Reagan was elected, suggesting the work of London working with their agents in the USA. The mullahs were brought into power by the USA/UK and other Western countries......but it is London which has exercised the greater power over mullah Iran since 1979.

This is a pity given the loss of power of the USA in Iran, AND the huge opportunity cost of loss in business for both countries........and how should we calculate this loss mathematically and precisely? $1000 billion......$1500 billion. To be sure both Iran and the USA lost. But the poor relations between the two nations for 3 decades was unnecessary. The humiliation of the USA in Iran was particularly unnecessary.

Being a superpower trying to rule the world, whilst it is simultaneously existentially run by little Israel is hard enough. But a superpower which gets rid of one its most trusted ally/puppet, "Policeman of the Gulf" and replaces it with a mullah regime which heaps nothing but verbal abuse on the USA seems rather immature and stupid.

As it happens at least the mullahs have matured to a certain extent, and as early/late as 2003 sought a grand bargain with the USA, with everything on the table (i) Diplomatic recognition of Israel (ii) defunding Hezbollah (iii) Defunding of Hamas and Islamic Jihad (iv) Full overt cooperation with the USA in Iraq (v) Full overt cooperation with the USA in Afghanistan....and much more. The Bush II junta on a Crusade for Israel, after the Israelis pulled 9/11 was not remotely interested but instead settled for nasty threats against Iran as part of the "Axis of Evil" from 2003, until January 2009, narrowly avoiding war......due to the efforts of more mature adult Americans in various State entities facing up to the pressure exerted by the Jooos and Fox News.

So now we have this small modest proposal, which of course existed between the USA and Soviet Union. Iran run by Mullahs, originally brought into power by the USA, is of course no Soviet Union.

__________________________

Report: US Considering Military Hotline with Iran

By Payvand News and VOA.

VOA

A U.S. newspaper says the United States is considering trying to establish a direct military hotline with Iran in order to defuse potential confrontations between the two countries' military forces.

Iran-US Hotline

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that one proposal would create a link between the Iranian Navy and the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet, which is based in the Persian Gulf island nation of Bahrain.

The newspaper said U.S. officials are particularly concerned about a fleet of speedboats likely controlled by Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard, which they say has been involved in several near-altercations.

The report says it is unclear if the hotline idea has been raised with Iran, and said the White House, Pentagon and an Iranian diplomat all declined to comment on the matter.

The United States has not had diplomatic relations with Iran since 1980.

The Journal quoted Pentagon press secretary George Little saying the U.S. remains concerned about “Iran's destabilizing activities and ambitions.”

In 2008, the U.S. accused a fleet of Iranian naval boats of threatening American warships in the Strait of Hormuz. Former U.S. president George W. Bush said Iran would face “serious consequences” if it attacked U.S. ships.

Iran dismissed the encounter as routine and demanded the United States apologize for its portrayal of the incident. Both sides released videos that they said supported their version of the events.

The U.S. Navy said last year that an Iranian navy patrol plane flew within 900 meters of a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Gulf of Oman. Iranian media quoted an Iranian navy commander saying Iran has a right to carry out reconnaissance flights over international waters, but did not directly address the incident.

The U.S. has also accused Iran of sponsoring attacks on U.S. forces in neighboring Iraq, as well as terrorism.

Washington has imposed sanctions on Tehran for its nuclear enrichment activities and refusal to cooperate with the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog agency. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

___________________________

Related Article: Admiral Mullen Concerned Over Lack of U.S.-Iran Contact

Posted by at
Labels:

Sep 21, 2011

Careful navigation on this one, there's enough to go around.

.
.
.
.

China reiterates its objection to India's role in South China Sea exploration

By Times of India.

India will be infringing on "China's sovereignty and national interest" if ONGC Videsh goes ahead with its plans to explore oil and gas in the South China Sea, the Chinese foreign ministry reiterated on Monday. The Indian company has worked out plans to explore the sea area along with Vietnamese oil companies.

The statement comes after the Indian government indicated it has taken into consideration the position of China and Vietnam before allowing ONGC Videsh to enter into business contract with Vietnamese firms. China and Vietnam are locked in a dispute over ownership of islands in South China Sea, which has huge reserves of oil and gas. Even Japan, Philippines and Indonesia are involved in disputes over sea island ownership with China.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei said any move by countries outside the South China Sea region will "complicate and magnify the dispute" that Beijing has with the Vietnamese government. China's "indisputable sovereignty" over the concerned islands is based on full historical and jurisprudential evidence going back to the Han dynasty.

Any country wishing to explore for oil should closely study China's position and obtain its permission before venturing to do so, he said.
Posted by at
Labels:

Yes, more cooperation of this type.

.
.
.
.
Zardari and his Kleptocracy backed by the blank cheque USA is the biggest crook in Pakistan. If Pakistanis need to go all the way to India to seek wisdom and inspiration to fight Zardari, and corruption in Pakistan generally!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So be it.....if it works.

Zardari Bhen is a OTT parody of what is wrong with Pakistan in a rather Bollywood goonda way.........it can't be real and true surely?

But the ever smiling man who goes on expensive state financed trips to the West, so that he can check his loot money of $3 billion stolen from the poor Pakistani people, WHILST the country suffers many problems, must surely be an affront to the IZZAT of the Pakistani nation of 190 million......if after so many years the country has any Izzat left.

__________________________

Pakistani team to meet Anna Hazare for tips on anti-graft crusade

By Times of India

Social activist Anna Hazare, who led one of India's biggest mass movements against corruption, will receive a Pakistani delegation at his home in Ralegan Siddhi, Maharashtra, on Wednesday to seek his opinion on starting a similar drive in their country.

The delegation constitutes three legal experts, including former Pakistan law minister Iqbal Haider. The meeting has been organised by the NGO Sarhad.

"The delegation will meet Anna Hazare at 1 pm and discuss starting a similar movement in their country because both have similar problems of corruption and terrorism," Sanjay Nahar, who heads Sarhad, said.

"We want to take his views on how this movement can be started in Pakistan," he added.

Hazare went on a 12-day fast in the capital last month demanding a strong anti-graft bill, attracting the support of massive crowds.
Posted by at
Labels:

Failed State Pakistan, still failing

.
.
.
.

I take it that the rumors of Sharif (PML (N) being on the American payroll is true, which explains his total silence ( save a few comfy safe GEO interviews) whilst the country goes down the sewage hole. This means he should not become the next President because he will be repeating the same mistakes as Zardari bhen, but in a slightly less obvious open ended way.

Has Sharif been promised the Presidency in 2013, if he keeps quiet by the USA?

Zardari bhen is an easy political leader to protest against, simply because the man has so many faults in a bad Bollywood goonda way.....any idiot should be able pick on these, and exploit it to their political advantage. Unless they are on the American payroll, and maintaining the present status quo for Amerikkajee is of the utmost importance.

Any good honest political leader should be able to rock the boat, and shout like Sheikh Mujib about the massive corruption; lack of governance; lack of government; lack of security; endless wars for the USA; lack of adequate food; lack of adequate education WITH REAL CONVICTION AND PASSION..........thats should theoretically be the easy part.

The hard part is efficient governance once you come to power. Populist leaders promise the earth in South Asia, but once they come to power, they fail. They fail themselves and they fail the country.

Imran Khan the former cricketer, playboy and now politician who married a Jewish lady who just happened to be related to the infamous Rothschilds family, now has two Jewish sons through his marriage to Jemima Goldsmith. This is not an uncommon habit of many an elite Pakistani who are not emotionally attached to their country. He is educated at Oxford and has been reared in the elite Glitterati Beautiful circle of the UK......where he lived extensively, and is touted by and interviewed by the Jewish Western media. I am not sure beyond the usual Rahul Gandhi photo ops, Imran Khan understands the real meaning of struggle for himself, his party and of course his country.

But then again having Jewish links is not an automatic disqualification. Gadaffi of Libya is Jewish on his mothers side, but he is also a good leader for his people where under his able 42 year leadership Libya became known as the Switzerland of Africa.

In the present dire circumstances Pakistan is in, Imran Khan though given his background and connections seems a very unlikely but welcome leader for Pakistan in 2013, or sooner.

He though needs to ditch his school boy naivety about the Security apparatus of Pakistan, and especially of-course the Pakistan Punjabi military. He needs to do extensive "homework" on the security apparatus of Pakistan, and their linkage with the Western nations. Their games and tricks, paranoia and psychology (they in their tightly knit club live in a planet of their own........a truly weird sociopathic bunch) It is this covert unaccountable link that ultimately harms Pakistan into a failed state for so many years, even though the country is abundant in human talent and potential.

After all 30-40% of Pakistanis are Aryan. They deserve better. South Asia deserves better from Pakistan. Iran deserves better from Pakistan. Afghanistan deserves better from Pakistan. China deserves better from Pakistan.

____________________________

Pak President Asif Ali Zardari an impotent puppet, says Imran Khan

Sameer Arshad of the Times of India.

Cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan has denounced Pakistan president Asif Ali Zardari as "an impotent puppet" who has not delivered anything to the Americans, and said the US was going to "have to kill a lot of people to make any impact" in the war on terror.

The 58-year-old Oxford alumnus has used anti-Americanism to perfection in a country where most people see politicians as US puppets who facilitate the deadly drone attacks. Not surprisingly , for his tough talk against the US, Khan's popularity is on the rise. The latest surveys rank him as the most popular Pakistani politician and the likely prime minister after the 2014 polls.

Khan described the war in Afghanistan as "most insane and immoral" and asked the government to pull out of it in an interview with The Guardian on Monday. He said the war was unwinnable because it involves more killings and, consequently, more radicalization. "The Soviets killed more than a million people in Afghanistan. They were fighting more at the end than the beginning. Clearly, a population of 15 million could take a million dead and still keep fighting."

While criticizing the drone attacks, Khan also regretted the lack of international acknowledgement of Pakistan's contribution to the war on terror. "CIA chief (Leon) Panetta says that the Pakistan government was either incompetent or complicit (in protecting Osama bin Laden). They're talking about a country in which 35,000 people have died during a war that had nothing to do with us." Khan said bin Laden's presence and killing in Pakistan was humiliating for the country.

"Wherever I went, I felt this anger in the people. It was humiliating because an American president announces it, not our president. And because it was the American military, not our military, which this country has given great sacrifices to nurture, that killed him."

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf chief stressed that US aid to his country's "puppet government" was destroying it. "We're using our army to kill our own people with American money." Khan predicted that Pakistan's people seem destined to suffer as much as they did during the British colonial rule in "an era of neocolonialism''.
Posted by at
Labels:

Sep 18, 2011

"al-CIA-duh" accepted as member of UN; Tim Osman not present to give acceptance speech.

.
.
.
.
Libyan al-Qaeda Gets Seat at United Nations

Kurt Nimmo at Infowars.com

The United Nations has approved a seat for al-Qaeda at the globalist forum. From the Associated Press:

"The U.N. General Assembly voted Friday to give Libya’s seat in the world body to the former rebels’ National Transitional Council which led the rebellion that ousted Moammar Gadhafi"

The resolution was approved Friday by a vote of 114-17 with 15 abstentions, revealing divisions in Africa and Latin America over who should represent Libya. (Today it is Libya tomorrow it could be your country......using criminal generals, and security or unhappy marginal civilians who are not satisfied with the government (Syria), but represent only about 1% of the population)





















Khalifa Haftar is a documented CIA asset.(This means he's into drugs running, money laundering, currency counterfeiting, pornography, child trafficking, destabilization of various nations, genocidal wars in Third World nations and everything else the Jewish International mafia love to do......along with the BND, and British Intelligence)

The corporate media has all but ignored the fact that Khalifa Haftar, who was appointed chief rebel commander March 17, is a long-time CIA collaborator.

Warnings about arming and supporting the al-Qaeda linked rebels have come from all quarters, including Russia, China, Turkey and even the Pope.

According to Tarpley, “an overstretched and moribund US-UK imperialism is using al Qaeda as its own irregular infantry in the effort to harass and cripple the nation-states of the world, causing them to disintegrate into a tribal, sectarian, criminal, and warlord chaos. In the current phase, al Qaeda has resumed its original status as CIA guerrillas.”

Those CIA guerrillas have now gained international cachet and legitimacy at the United Nations as NATO continues to bomb civilians in Libya and press for the arrest or assassination of Gaddafi.

A Latin American trade group, described as “left-leaning” by the corporate media, opposed giving the seat to the CIA guerrillas. Venezuela accused NATO forces of carrying out “criminal air raids … in order to install a puppet government.”

The General Assembly’s credentials committee unanimously recommended that al-Qaeda be seated, although Southern Africa’s main regional bloc opposed giving the National Transitional Council credentials. It failed to win support to defer a vote.

The vote means al-Qaeda will speak for Libya at next week’s ministerial meeting of the General Assembly.

Posted by at
Labels:

Sep 17, 2011

Everything peachy and dandy in "liberated" Muslim Brotherhood Egypt.

.
.
.
.
The vast majority of Israelis want peace, but a cabal of men in Israel, and the West thrive on conflict and subsequent war. This may be based on HOMOSEXUAL URGES (Sado machismo...deriving sexual pleasure from pain).....or financial interests, obtaining greater access to minerals in the target country whilst shutting out competition from other countries, and therefore better business advantage.

Thus the USA backed revolution in Egypt against Mubarak, and the subsequent instability affords them this opportunity. It renders the Egyptians STATE weak, helpless and clueless too busy with its own problems.

The primary traitors who allowed this USA game to take place in Egypt was the Egyptian military, who failed to support Mubarak at the critical time.

The Egyptian military is trained by the USA, with 1000 personnel going to the USA annually for "training", and military aid......most of the Egyptian military equipment is USA supplied, which means should the USA invade Egypt, the Egyptian military will not be able to resist the Imperial invader, as it has been infiltrated, indoctrinated, brainwashed, and made wholly dependent on the JEWSA.

The Egyptian military followed the orders of the USA and the strategic requirements of that countries Jewish elite who have their own peculiar set of priorities, AND not the strategic needs of Egypt (which are stability, rapid economic development, good governance, good government, anti-corruption drive, checking Western Capitalist hegemony.....politically, militarily, culturally, socially and at all other levels.......and peaceful co-existence with Israel, whilst helping the Palestinian people where practically possible as fellow Arabs and for the sake of justice)

______________________________


EGYPT IN A STATE OF ANARCHY by aangirfan























On 13 September 2011, we read that Egypt is in a state of anarchy s

Zvi Mazel was Israel’s ambassador to Cairo between 1996 and 2001.

According to Mazel:

1. There is now so much violence on the streets of Egypt that Egyptian militias have purchased weapons to protect their neighbourhoods.

2. Looting of stores is prevalent in all the large cities and no one is even trying to control the anarchy.

3. "From the moment the army seized power they've been weak and have let the street dictate their conduct...

"These generals do not know how to run a state.

"Egypt is in a state of anarchy."

4. "Opening a front against Israel will force Egypt to transfer all the money to the army and from that moment there will be no reforms."

5. "Although the Egyptian government is weak and not able to take control, there are still clever people there who know they have no other option but to maintain the peace with Israel.”

~~

One of the reasons for the CIA coup in Egypt was to weaken Egypt.

The USA-Israel-NATO may be planning an invasion of the Sinai and a seizure of the Suez canal?

~~

The London Telegraph has admitted that the new rulers of Libya are genocidal racists.

"In the Telegraph's article Gaddafi's ghost town after the loyalists retreat, it is reported that rebels have taken the city of Tawarga, where the entire civilian population was either killed, rounded up, or exiled."

Libya: V Day + 3 Weeks
Posted by at
Labels:

Sep 16, 2011

"al-Qaeda" Libya and two domestically unpopular grinning boys

.
.
.
.
The donkey mullahs call this the "Great Islamic awakening"....where Western leaders make triumphal PR visits to such conquered and destabilized countries in the Middle East.

Perhaps the donkey mullahs see certain basic similarities of what happened in Iran 32 years ago, and what is happening in the Middle East now, BUT fail to grasp the sly slippery evil machinations of Western Imperialism using Islamic Fundamentalists as a fifth column to usurp power, destabilize nations, which then become the natural target for further future hostility against the nations a few years later as was the case with Taliban Afghanistan.

Taliban Afghanistan initiated by the USA in 1994 with Pakistan's help, and attacked by the USA in 2001.....the military training for which had taken place a few years earlier, and now occupied by a coalition of Crusader countries, and Pakistan's military backing.

Maybe we will see, Ayatollah Khomenei visit Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Syria after such popular "Islamic awakening" revolutions. He will be warmly welcomed along with Jew Ahmedinejad. Though it will look strange for him to share the rejoicing with Western leaders like Sarkozy and Cameron in such countries, and leaders who are otherwise hostile to Iran.

The mullah donkeys don't like the USA backed and installed Taliban, but like the new "al-CIA-duh" government in Libya.

The mullah donkeys don't like the USA backed and installed Taliban, but like the new "al-CIA-duh" backed Islamic Brotherhood movement which is now very politically pro-active in Egypt, taking an unnecessary hostile stand against Israel, so that Western forces can find the excuse to occupy the Sinai.

The mullah donkeys don't like the USA backed and installed Taliban, but like the new "al-CIA-duh" backed opposition which toppled the Ben Ali government in Tunisia.

The mullah donkeys don't like the USA backed and installed Taliban, but some mullahs have stated especially at Friday prayers that they like the new "al-CIA-duh" opposition in Syria.

The donkey mullahs of Iran who should be confined to mosques ONLY, and not in government running a sophisticated country of 75 million, stealing its petro wealth............are confused clueless idiots who are controlled by Israel and London from the shadows.

That is why they talk and act through the backside, in Iran, outside Iran...and against Iranians fundamental strategic interests.


Kurt Nimmo at Infowars.com

British PM David Cameron and French president Nicolas Sarkozy arrived in Tripoli, Libya, on Thursday and have pledged to provide military, political and economic support to al-Qaeda.

The New York Times, however, does not mention the fact al-Qaeda is part of Libya’s new leadership. The newspaper instead concentrates on “jubilant Libyans praising [Cameron and Sarkozy's] role in pushing the erstwhile Libyan dictator out of formal power,” while saying nothing about the price average Libyans had to pay.(for their "Liberation")

Sarkozy and Cameron said NATO air-strikes will continue so long as Libyans resist the invasion of their country by the global elite. They made the comments during a news conference with al-Qaeda:

They were speaking at a news conference alongside Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, the leader of the interim administration set up by the insurgents, and Mahmoud Jibril, the rebels’ de facto prime minister, who said the rebels still needed NATO “protection for our civilians.”

Jalil is from the Haribi tribe in northeastern Libya. It is linked to al-Qaeda. Many of the CIA’s assets in Afghanistan during the war against the Soviet Union were from Libya and they would later merge with al-Qaeda. Ayman al-Zawahiri gave the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) his personal seal of approval and the LIFG officially joined the group in 2007. A West Point study revealed the intimacy between Libyans and al-Qaeda in Iraq allegedly responsible for killing U.S. occupation troops.

Behind Abdel-Jalil and Mahmoud Jibril stands Abdelhakim Belhaj, the founder of LIFG. “Hardly by accident, all the top military rebel commanders are LIFG,” writes Pepe Escobar. Belhaj, a dedicated al-Qaeda jihadist, is considered the top Libyan military commander.

“This was your revolution, not our revolution,” Cameron told al-Qaeda.

(Of course Western Special Forces, backed by 30,000 air sorties helped the handful of 'al-Qaeda" rebels to win against Gaddafi in occupying most of the country. Controlling the country is another matter. Controlling the country for Western Imperial and economic interests is another matter)

The New York Times and the rest of the establishment media are working overtime to portray the Transitional National Council and al-Qaeda as heroes and the legitimate rulers of Libya. Precious little corporate media space is squandered on the fact NATO’s rebels are murderous racists.

Cameron and Sarkozy did not arrive in Tripoli merely to heap praise on al-Qaeda – they paid a visit in order to promote business: the business of the bankers and transnational corporations.

The trip, according to the New York Times, “was also part of a high-stakes play by both leaders to cast themselves as successful and muscular champions of democracy as their business elites vie for opportunity in post-Qaddafi Libya.”

The globalists prefer that their captured dominion be ruled over by austere and violent Sunni Wahhabists or other wide-eyed fanatics, as was the case in Afghanistan before the U.S. decided to invade the country and overthrow their former partners, the CIA and ISI created Taliban.(From 1994)

The U.S. State Department saw “nothing objectionable” when the Taliban took over the country in the mid-1990s after the Soviets fled.

“The Taliban will probably develop like the Saudis. There will be Aramco [the consortium of oil companies that controlled Saudi oil], pipelines, an emir, no parliament and lots of Sharia law. We can live with that,” a U.S. diplomat said in 1997.

Like al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, the variant in Libya will likely become another enemy in short order and we will be told billions of dollars more must be squandered – and more women and children butchered (In yet another Middle East country) – lest the evil ones plot against freedom lovers.
Posted by at
Labels: ,

Sep 13, 2011

The colonial occupation of Afghanistan, and ALL the wonderful developments in the country.

.
.
.
.
Things have gone downhill in the USA, and very naturally they should go downhill everywhere else the USA has a presence.

The USA is run by a cabal of criminals who control both the Republican and Democratic Parties. The quality of governance and government does not change with fresh elections and a new party in power.

There naturally will be a global sigh of relief when the USA collapses financially, through purely its own fault of its corrupt elite, and is replaced by China as the new "Hyper Power."

10 years ago I predicted and dreaded this outcome, but now I secretly pray this outcome to come to fruitition sooner rather than later. I made the rather simplistic analysis that a Democractic Power which is accountable to the people is always preferable to the power of a dictatorship which is accountable to no one. But the Democratic land of the free, and brave have committed so many crimes since 1945, to so many nations, resulting in the death and suffering of 10's of millions of innocent poor people.......for the benefit of narcotics, and other criminality and whimsy with a holier than though pompous loud mouth grin, that rather paradoxically an Asian superpower, for the first time after 300 years, looks rather appealing.

Yes dictatorships are bad, as was Hitler, but the reality of history is far more complex. The British Empire committed unspeakable crimes, as the nation hosting the mother of all parliaments for nearly 200 years. It still rather enthusiastically displays Imperialist tendencies, as its soldiers swagger, murder, rape, loot, torture, peddle drugs back to the UK, and molest through various Third World nations from Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan.

China by contrast displays none of this. Historically over many millenia it has had bad relations with Korea, Japan and Vietnam, BUT the current trajectory and projection of Chinese POWER is peaceful co-existence, fair trade, and helping nations build their infrastructure. Maoist wild dogmatism has been firmly rejected, replaced by pragamtism and Communism with two faces.

One does not have to be a firm believer in China (Sinophile) to see that broadly speaking Chinese State policies make sense and are logical, whilst by contrast those of the USA are irrational and criminal against the USA itself and the wider world.

Nowhere is this criminality and irrationality more greatly exemplified than the USA occupation of Afghanistan for the last 10 years.

Drugs, talent, crass, Western civilisation, coalition of the willing, right-wing policies.



________________________________

US-Supported Afghan Militias Commit Widespread Human Rights Abuses

A Human Rights Watch report details impunity of criminal gangs, off the hook due to ties to corrupt Afghan officials

by John Glaser, at antiwar.com

US-supported Afghan militias are committing widespread human rights abuses, but neither Washington or Kabul are holding them accountable or changing policy in light of the crimes, according to a new Human Rights Watch report.

The report “documents serious abuses, such as killings, rape, arbitrary detention, abductions, forcible land grabs, and illegal raids by irregular armed groups in northern Kunduz province and the Afghan Local Police (ALP).” The governments of the United States and of Afghanistan have not only failed to hold these forces to account, but they have fostered future abuses and generated more support for the Taliban and the insurgency, the report finds.

The ALP was created in July 2010, intended by US strategy to supplement the Afghan national army at the community and village level in the lead up to the drawdown of US occupation forces. This one force is approximately 7,000 strong across Afghanistan, although plans are underway to arm and train up to 30,000.

In March 2011, General Petraeus told the US Senate that the ALP is “arguably the most critical element in our effort to help Afghanistan develop the capacity to secure itself.” Yet the ALP, along with various other longstanding US-supported militias, are committing severe crimes and helping to drive the insurgency.

The ALP has been accused of “beating teenage boys and hammering nails into the feet of one boy,” although no arrests were made. “In April,” the report documents, “four armed ALP members in Baghlan abducted a 13-year-old boy on his way home from the bazaar and took him to the house of an ALP sub-commander, where he was gang raped.” The perpetrators are well known, but no arrests have been made.

The ALP has raided several houses, stolen personal belongings, beat residents, and illegally detained six men. Like in the other cases though, no arrests or investigations have been initiated because of the militias’ patronage links to senior Afghan officials.

The Obama administration’s policy to surge and then announce a gradual withdrawal out of at least some areas of Afghanistan was said to be based on providing security and winning hearts and minds. But their own security forces are abusive thugs that deteriorate the security situation. And Afghan hearts and minds are leaning far, far away from US forces.

Posted by at
Labels:

Sep 11, 2011

So the Iranian navy has some use?

.
.
.
.
And so we have finally found an use for the Great Persian navy with its fleet of huge Arctic Soviet era submarines in the very shallow transparent waters of the Persian Gulf (5), and an array of other warships some reportedly reverse engineered and wholly built by Iran.

For a while the agents of Tel av-iv and London, existing within the shadows of Iran had told us that the great Persian fleet had sailed to the Suez canal, the Mediterranean, the Red sea, the Atlantic....and possibly up the Potomac.

Strange flurry of gay-like behavior during such delicate times of the "CIA-Spring", for a nation seeking peace and co-existence in the neighborhood at least..........as their leaders state so often, with sincerity.

Will the great Persian navy sail to the moon next, maybe?

Iran is a land power for the last 3000 years. This fact has not changed. This fact will never change....because of geography.

Iran is a weak land power, which for 260 years has not defended her borders adequately and as a result has lost territory to Imperial Russia (Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan)......and the UK imperial power (Afghanistan/Herat..Baluchistan/Pakistan).

Logically a sensible Iranian government must pull all Defense resources into protecting her truncated borders FIRST,........ before SAILING TO THE MOON......which in any case is purely for political puppet mullah gimmickary.

Even after putting ALL of Iran's resources in defending Iran's borders (3% of GDP) it is not guaranteed that the Pasdaran and Artesh will do their jobs effectively, given their organization, training, C & C, military doctrine, lack of equipment, spares, fuel, ammunition.

When Saddam attacked in 1980, 80% of the fighting was done by ground forces on land, and 15--20% by the airforce. The navy had a zero role.

The USA/NATO/Israel are not Saddam Hussein.

If however Iran were to possess 2---4000 SAMs batteries, with 200,000 domestically produced SAM missiles with a variety of ranges; 30,000 AA guns.......1000 combat planes, and 20,000 Lt SAMs, with 2,000,000 missiles. 200,000 air-defense/air-force personnel.

......And 1,000,000 ground forces equipped with 5000 artillery pieces 105mm--155mm, 15,000 Mortars...81mm---120mm, and 30,000 ATGWs/TOW with 2,000,000 small missiles, 1,000,000 night vision equipment......with bases spread out throughout the country, and not flag filled barracks...BUT underground (as with North Korea and Vietnam), then maybe they will think twice about attacking Iran....and slaughtering many people and looting as they have done in Iraq.


_________________________

Iran's Navy thwarts pirate attack

Presstv.com

The naval forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran have thwarted an attack by pirates against an Iranian ship in Bab-el-Mandeb Strait.


“Eight pirate speed boats attempted to simultaneously approach an Iranian ship near the Abu Ali isle in Bab-el-Mandeb Strait,” Iran's Navy Deputy Commander Rear Admiral Seyyed Mahmoud Mousavi said on Saturday.

The Iranian naval forces, however, foiled their attacks, Mousavi added.

The incident brings the number of confrontations between Iran's Navy with pirates in international waters in the current year to 21.

In line with international efforts against piracy, the Iranian Navy has been conducting anti-piracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden since November 2008 to safeguard maritime trade and in particular ships and oil tankers owned or leased by Iran.
Posted by at
Labels:

Potpuri of allegations but missing the irony

.
.
.
.
The UK is a pro-active global power beyond its middle ranking power status.

This is especially so for the last 250 years, as the country slowly acquired an empire, and colonization of North America, Australia and other parts of the world.

A lot of the UK global power is now intertwined with the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, nations which have many things in common with the UK. A lot of its military, diplomatic and security policies are thus carried out in conjunction with these former colonies of the UK to a greater or lessor degree.

Another view is that the UK is a satellite client power of the USA, and thus the UK always joins in with the USA, in the latter's misadventures abroad out of a servile obedient need to obey the master, even if its in direct contradiction of popular public opinion.

The Final view is that the UK is host to the Rothschilds banking clan for about 220 years, which is the richest family in the world of Jewish background, and that the UK State to a greater degree operates as an arm of the paranoia/perceptions/designs/peccadilloes/Quija Ja board fantasies (Brown calfs, Nostradamus, sacred numbers, aliens, satanism, greed, ambition......too much wealth and power detaches people from reality)/whim for the day of this particular family and that through this power house it is London which directs the hapless super power through their agents in the USA, mostly of Jewish origin operating within the elite structure of that country.

Though to be fair to the Rothschilds, its not always Jew this and Jew that. You need two hands to clap. For every Rothschild misadventure around the world, on yet another international scheme, at the end of the day they still need the dump-fuck little Englanders to obey and carry out their orders within the UK State structure, dressed up presumably as essential UK State policy.

Thus one can persuasively argue that yes the UK did create the Taliban, and yes the UK had a hand in 9/11; The role of the BBC on that fateful day acting as a propaganda machine legitimating the Bush II conspiracy in Jew York. Purportedly some of the Rothschild along with members of the Israeli government were in their exclusive penthouse suite in Jew York, with a panoramic view of the twin towers .....accompanied no doubt with champagne, Caviar and Belgian chocolates.

The Taliban was officially created by the USA, using the Pakistani military from 1994. Sandy Berger and other USA officials went to Pakistan 1993/94 and proposed to the Benazir Bhutto government to back the Taliban. If Benazir agreed to such a plan, then the USA threat to label Pakistan a terrorist state would be lifted, and with the Pakistani military the JEWSA sold it as a "Strategic Depth" leverage viz a vi India. Funding came from the GCC countries for the Taliban project, as they had also funded the Afghan Mujaheddin, and as they have also funded the Libyan rebels recently.

If Benazir Bhutto did state that the Taliban was created by the UK, then let us have transcripts of the interview. In fact let the book below be translated into English if it is peer reviewed and is actually any good.

Also it is extremely misleading to blame the UK for the creation of the Taliban, and not hold the locals with responsibility.

As stated before you need local dumb-fucks to carry out the dirty deed. Rothschilds global power has always required Anders Brevik type marginal, often gay, low IQ lonely individuals to initiate their policies around the world, within well funded populist groups which suddenly appear during times of national crisis and doubt in various nations (that which is created by the Rothschilds strategically using their agents).

In the case of the Taliban it was the Pakistani military, a nation which itself was created by the UK, and it is the UK which created the ISI. It is this link which encouraged the Pakistani military to Islamise Pakistan from the 1970's and back the Islamic Fundamentalist Mujaheddin of Afghanistan from the late 1970's with overt USA encouragement within the purview of Operation Cyclone and Operation Greenbelt. But given that Iran is NOW attempting better relations with Pakistan, including the funding of strategic projects in the country, this should not mean that credible writers on the topic should erase the role of local dumb-fucks in the creation of the Taliban. If so this would be false analysis.

Yes let us have better relations between Pakistan and Iran but let us also not forget in our over enthusiasm, that Mossad Busharaf but a few years ago as a populist Brigadier on the back of Deobandism/Wahabism/Saudi funding was carrying out pogroms against Shia Pakistanis in Gilgit and the NWFP, using Arab and local Jihadis. Let us not forget that the Pakistani military have trained up around 500,000 Jihadis since the 1970's even though they have zero military value. Let us not forget that it is Pakistani security forces which are operating in Bahrain against local Shia Arabs. Let us not forget that it is the Pakistani military along with the Americans who have airlifted Jihadis from Afghanistan/Pakistan to fight alongside the rebels in Libya.

The very same Sunni Islamist CIA backed rebels, assisted by Western Special Forces and Western air-power....which many political leaders in Iran think is a victory and vindication/affirmation of Mullah Iran.

But the writer of the book below is essentially right, and in saying so logically the British also had a hand in installing the mullahs into power in Iran in 1979. The British created the Muslim League in India in 1905; created the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1920's in Egypt......and backed the Wahabi Saudis into power in the last century.

The UK is a problem country.
__________________

'UK, not Pakistan, created Taliban'

Presstv.com

Head of the IRIB World Service Mohammad Sarafraz says the United Kingdom was the first state which created the Taliban militant group in Afghanistan.


“The first state which created the Taliban was not Pakistan; the Taliban was created by Britain in the first place,” Sarafraz said at the review session of his book The Taliban Movement: The Mystery of its Rise and Fall, Fars News Agency reported Saturday.

Sarafraz said the notion was confirmed by Former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto during an interview with the state-run BBC, but currently all records of it have been removed from archives and this was ultimately the reason behind her assassination in December 2007.

Bhutto was slain in a gun-and-bomb attack as she was leaving an election rally in the city of Rawalpindi in Pakistan.

“Now all the media archives of this interview have been erased,” he further explained.

Sarafraz went on to say that “in the death of Benazir Bhutto, there are suspects such as Pervez Musharraf, who is regarded as one of the prime suspects, but he is now living in Britain.”

Musharraf, who is a retired army general, was the President of Pakistan when Bhutto was assassinated. Many Pakistani officials have pointed the finger of blame at the then government of Musharraf and threatened to take action against the former military ruler.

Sarafraz also raised the issue of September 11, 2001 attacks and questioned the scenarios presented by the US government about the incident.

“Al-Qaeda and the US have devised scenarios in this regard, which have been discussed in the book, but the attacks were not staged by a group called al-Qaeda and there are many contradictions in this matter,” he pointed out.

“The US passenger airliners are completely automatic so that ordinary pilots cannot steer them,” Sarafraz said, adding that a hole was created on the side of the Pentagon building during the attacks, which shows it was not hit by an airplane, but by a missile.

In a recent blog entry, former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said that the attacks on the World Trade Center in downtown Manhattan, New York City, and the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, could not have been carried out by Muslims but it was the “American Government” itself which performed the attacks.

Recent video images leaked ahead of the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 incident confirm eye-witness accounts that the attack was made by a cruise missile rather than a passenger plane.

The close photographs of the Pentagon also show no wreckage of the plane, although normally the remains of a plane wreck sometimes cover a square of a mile.

According to the Iranian author, the newly published book also discusses the Russian occupation of Afghanistan and issues related to Pakistan's spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), and army.

Additionally, the work makes analytical speculations about the future political prospects of Taliban militants and the US presence in Afghanistan.

The book, The Taliban Movement: The Mystery of its Rise and Fall is the first book on the Taliban published in Persian language.
Posted by at
Labels:

Sep 8, 2011

Iran's new radar.

.
.
.
.
It is always pleasing news to hear about yet another new invention by Persia in the military field.

However with puppet mullah Iran one cannot be sure of what is truth and what is propaganda.

Liars, great liars constantly boast about how wonderful they are, whereas honest people generally remain silent about their achievements. They prefer to rely on their accomplishments.

Iran keeps boasting about yet another great military invention and this has been the case for the last 30 years. I do not understand the psychology behind it.....after ALL Iran spends a mere 3% of GDP on defense, so why boast about a part of the economy which is small in comparison to say the Mullah run charities (Bonyards), or the businesses run by the Revolutionary Guard.......or the State banks that give out free loans to friends of the mullahs, or the massive corruption around the petro-chemicals industry......or.......or.....or.

Why expose and highlight a very small part of the economy, and inform the rest of the world about it? Why tell the rest of the world of Iran's military capabilities? Why create the impression falsely, that Iran is a nation which invests in military science and research above all else?

If you are trying to convince the world about how Iran has peaceful intentions with its nuclear technology, is it not wiser not to boast too often about new breakthrough's in military science. The boasting may create a disconnect with the paranoid powerful few.

So Iran has a new radar.....so what? Iran regularly announces new developments in defense equipment, but what is critical is the:

INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURE (uninterrupted supply of raw materials)
MASS ASSEMBLY PRODUCTION
THE SPARES
MAINTENANCE
FUEL, AMMUNITION
TRAINED PERSONNEL

(From Wikipedia):

Aircraft and Helicopters

See also: Iran Aviation Industries Organization, HESA, and Panha

Unmanned aerial vehicles

Aircraft upgrades and components

  • Iran claims to have upgraded its US-made F-4, F-5, and F-14 fighter jets, and produced spare parts including tires, avionics, and engine components.

Simulators

  • F-4 Phantom Simulator[25]
  • Helicopter Simulators (AH-1J & Bell 206)[26]
  • Submarine Simulator - Iran's "Tareq-class" submarine.[27]

Radar systems

See also: Iran Electronics Industries

Missiles

Medium range (MRBM)

Medium range missiles are considered to have a range between 1000 and 3000 kilometers.

Short range (SRBM)

Short range missiles are considered to have a range up to 1000 kilometers.

Cruise missiles

  • Nasr-1 - Iranian made short range missiles.

Anti-tank missiles

Air defence weapons

Bombs

Air-to-air missiles

Naval missiles

Torpedo

Armored Vehicles

Iranian made Zulfiqar tank

Other vehicles

Artillery

Small arms

Boats and destroyers

Submarines

Midget Submarines

There is absolutely no point producing 100 different equipment....its meaningless, unless your economy is the size of the USA. Iran should focus on mass production of a few equipment, given that its economy is only $850 billion GDP PPP, and its not heavily industrialized. Focusing on a few key equipment worked well for the Soviet Union after 1941, even though before 1941 the Soviet Union produced a whole variety of equipment like Iran.

By 1945 the Soviet settled on just a few key equipment, such as the T-34, Katyusha rockets, basic field artillery, and the PPD-40.........about 5 key ARMY FIELD EQUIPMENT.

The Soviet Union at war did not bother with a navy....Iran does not need to bother with a navy.

On the other hand the Germans 1933-45 produced some beautiful equipment, the variety of which was astounding, and the engineering fantastic for their time. But Germany produced too few, and too many different types of equipment, and so they lost.

Iran must focus on a few key pieces of equipment, and then mass produce them.


__________________________________

Iran develops long-range radar system

By presstv.com

A senior Iranian commander says the Islamic Republic has succeeded in the design and production of a domestically-manufactured long-range radar system.

The advanced system can detect, intercept and destroy aircraft equipped with radar cross-section system (RCS), cruise missile and strategic long-range aircraft, the commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya Air Defense Base, Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili, said on Wednesday.

He added that the cosmos radar, designed by experts of the military base, can detect objects at a range of several thousand kilometers and will join Iran's air-defense in the near future, IRIB reported.

The Iranian commander emphasized that the Islamic Republic strongly monitors the slightest possible moves by any country.

Khatam al-Anbiya Air Defense Base is in charge of detecting and destroying any aircraft seeking to launch an aggression against the country, Esmaili pointed out.

The United States and Israel have repeatedly threatened Tehran with the "option" of a military strike, based on the allegation that Iran's nuclear work may consist of a covert military agenda.

Iran says its nuclear program is completely peaceful and within the framework of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which it is a signatory.

Iranian officials have warned that the Islamic Republic will give a firm and crushing response to any act of aggression by the US and Israel.
Posted by at
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)