Mar 25, 2012
Imran Khan has hope for Pakistan
.
.
.
One must always be optimistic.
He sees light at the end of the tunnel for Pakistan.
He states with added commentary, by me:
Pakistan now has a powerful independent Supreme Court, which does not cower in front of the military as it use to in the good old days.
Pakistan has a powerful independent media which is very focused on the REAL ISSUES which vexes the country into a failed state situation.
Pakistan's people are united and politically aware of all the big issues that affect the country.
Even Pakistans' children are aware of the big issues that affect the country.
In 1951 the population of Pakistan was 33 million with about 15% being urbanized, and an even smaller middle class. Today Pakistan has an unofficial population of 190 million and an urban population of about 36%. ....with 38 million Pakistanis belonging to the educated middle classes.
Such a state is harder to manage and fool than it would have been in the 1950's.
The second factor is that people in Pakistan have wised up to the relationship of the Pakistan military with the USA.......its covert and not so covert nature, and the consequent harm it does to Pakistani society.
Finally there is a level of desperation in Pakistan given the situation of the country which can't be explained away by mere propaganda......the critical desperation WILL force change in Pakistani society, hopefully peacefully and in elections soon this year.
Dec 19, 2011
Triump of democracy and civilian rule must previal
.
.
.
Gilani, at least on this point is right, there IS no room for military rule in Pakistan, ever again.
The Pakistan military through the careful guidance of the British Raj created ISI since 1948 have been the main source of fundamental and dire strategic mistakes that have incrementally taken the great nation of Pakistan down the road of failure after failure..........to failed state number das (as of 2011).
The rent a crowd fundies who canvass for the Pakistan military are but puppets who are also in addition a major part of the problem in Pakistan.
Of course such supreme truths could have come from a better source than a PM whose shadow-in-purda boss conspired with a foreign entity to stay in power for ever, based on the corrupt largess of the USA, even despite the fact that 90% of Pakistanis hate Zardari no end for obvious reasons. How does one justify staying in power through malicious devious means when the masses do not want them?
Graceful exit? Then fresh elections.
_______________________________
Pakistan Islamists Hold Massive Pro-Military Rally in Lahore
Clerics Condemn Zardari Over Rumored 'Coup' Attempt
Some 30,000 Islamist demonstrators from the Jamaat-ud Dawa (JuD) took to the streets of Lahore today, expressing solidarity with the Pakistani military at a time when military and civilian government seem increasingly at odds.
The rally was seen chiefly as an expression of support for the military after the US attack on a pair of military bases on November 26, with clerics also bringing up the “coup memo” from the Zardari government seeking to oust much of the military’s leadership and replace them with more pro-US officials.
Prime Minister Yousef Raza Gilani has attempted to shrug off rumors of a coup, dismissing both the allegations against Zardari and growing speculation that the military may move to oust him, saying there is “no room for a martial law in Pakistan.”
Pakistan’s military has a long history of coups, and while Gen. Parvez Kayani, the current military chief, has shown a rare level of opposition to military intervention in politics the growing split seems liable to provoke a reaction, if not from him, then from another top military official.
Nov 22, 2011
Zardari has to go.
.
.
.
Its no good.
Zardari has to go.
He is an utter failure as President.
Two years of more disasters from him is highly undesirable for Pakistan. How much more can the country endure?
Zardari is crap. He should retire, prance the world and enjoy his looted $4 billion from Pakistan in the casino's of the West and Las Vegas with his various gora friends.
But Zardari bhen did the country a BIG favor in highlighting the impossibility of civilian governments working with the Pakistan military......co-existence with the Pakistan military is neigh on impossible. So the Pakistan military has to be dealt with decisively by the next government.
Zardari in writing the "Memo" also highlighted the importance, influence and role of the Pentagon in running Pakistan. Zardari knows this fact.
Zardari should retire soon from power and make the wise choice of enjoying his loot money. My guess is 90% of Pakistanis hate him, despite the red carpet treatment mete out to him by Western governments.
_________________________
Pentagon Defends Zardari in ‘Coup Memo’ Scandal
Insists 'No Evidence' Zardari Was Involved in Attempt to Move Against Military
Faced with a massive political scandal surrounding his reported involvement in the “coup memo,” Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari got “help” from an unlikely, and likely unwelcome source, the Pentagon.
Pentagon spokesman John Kirby insisted that the moves against Zardari over the memo were unfair because there was no “credible evidence” that Zardari had been personally involved in sending the memo to Admiral Michael Mullen.
The memo, which was addressed as from Zardari, urged Mullen to use the US military to help him attack members of the Pakistani military’s leadership and promised to replace them with new leaders who were more friendly to US military interests.
The memo was delivered by a private Pakistani-American citizen, who said it was dictator to him by Ambassador Husain Haqqani. Haqqani has been recalled by Pakistan’s parliament to explain his involvement, and has offered to resign.
Key opposition leader Sardar Ayaz Sadiq rejected claims from the ruling party that the memo is a conspiracy against Zardari, saying that it is real and needs to be investigated at the highest levels.
Sep 21, 2011
Failed State Pakistan, still failing
.
.
.
I take it that the rumors of Sharif (PML (N) being on the American payroll is true, which explains his total silence ( save a few comfy safe GEO interviews) whilst the country goes down the sewage hole. This means he should not become the next President because he will be repeating the same mistakes as Zardari bhen, but in a slightly less obvious open ended way.
Has Sharif been promised the Presidency in 2013, if he keeps quiet by the USA?
Zardari bhen is an easy political leader to protest against, simply because the man has so many faults in a bad Bollywood goonda way.....any idiot should be able pick on these, and exploit it to their political advantage. Unless they are on the American payroll, and maintaining the present status quo for Amerikkajee is of the utmost importance.
Any good honest political leader should be able to rock the boat, and shout like Sheikh Mujib about the massive corruption; lack of governance; lack of government; lack of security; endless wars for the USA; lack of adequate food; lack of adequate education WITH REAL CONVICTION AND PASSION..........thats should theoretically be the easy part.
The hard part is efficient governance once you come to power. Populist leaders promise the earth in South Asia, but once they come to power, they fail. They fail themselves and they fail the country.
Imran Khan the former cricketer, playboy and now politician who married a Jewish lady who just happened to be related to the infamous Rothschilds family, now has two Jewish sons through his marriage to Jemima Goldsmith. This is not an uncommon habit of many an elite Pakistani who are not emotionally attached to their country. He is educated at Oxford and has been reared in the elite Glitterati Beautiful circle of the UK......where he lived extensively, and is touted by and interviewed by the Jewish Western media. I am not sure beyond the usual Rahul Gandhi photo ops, Imran Khan understands the real meaning of struggle for himself, his party and of course his country.
But then again having Jewish links is not an automatic disqualification. Gadaffi of Libya is Jewish on his mothers side, but he is also a good leader for his people where under his able 42 year leadership Libya became known as the Switzerland of Africa.
In the present dire circumstances Pakistan is in, Imran Khan though given his background and connections seems a very unlikely but welcome leader for Pakistan in 2013, or sooner.
He though needs to ditch his school boy naivety about the Security apparatus of Pakistan, and especially of-course the Pakistan Punjabi military. He needs to do extensive "homework" on the security apparatus of Pakistan, and their linkage with the Western nations. Their games and tricks, paranoia and psychology (they in their tightly knit club live in a planet of their own........a truly weird sociopathic bunch) It is this covert unaccountable link that ultimately harms Pakistan into a failed state for so many years, even though the country is abundant in human talent and potential.
After all 30-40% of Pakistanis are Aryan. They deserve better. South Asia deserves better from Pakistan. Iran deserves better from Pakistan. Afghanistan deserves better from Pakistan. China deserves better from Pakistan.
____________________________
Pak President Asif Ali Zardari an impotent puppet, says Imran Khan
Cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan has denounced Pakistan president Asif Ali Zardari as "an impotent puppet" who has not delivered anything to the Americans, and said the US was going to "have to kill a lot of people to make any impact" in the war on terror.
The 58-year-old Oxford alumnus has used anti-Americanism to perfection in a country where most people see politicians as US puppets who facilitate the deadly drone attacks. Not surprisingly , for his tough talk against the US, Khan's popularity is on the rise. The latest surveys rank him as the most popular Pakistani politician and the likely prime minister after the 2014 polls.
Khan described the war in Afghanistan as "most insane and immoral" and asked the government to pull out of it in an interview with The Guardian on Monday. He said the war was unwinnable because it involves more killings and, consequently, more radicalization. "The Soviets killed more than a million people in Afghanistan. They were fighting more at the end than the beginning. Clearly, a population of 15 million could take a million dead and still keep fighting."
While criticizing the drone attacks, Khan also regretted the lack of international acknowledgement of Pakistan's contribution to the war on terror. "CIA chief (Leon) Panetta says that the Pakistan government was either incompetent or complicit (in protecting Osama bin Laden). They're talking about a country in which 35,000 people have died during a war that had nothing to do with us." Khan said bin Laden's presence and killing in Pakistan was humiliating for the country.
"Wherever I went, I felt this anger in the people. It was humiliating because an American president announces it, not our president. And because it was the American military, not our military, which this country has given great sacrifices to nurture, that killed him."
The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf chief stressed that US aid to his country's "puppet government" was destroying it. "We're using our army to kill our own people with American money." Khan predicted that Pakistan's people seem destined to suffer as much as they did during the British colonial rule in "an era of neocolonialism''.
Sep 4, 2011
Clueless Billionaire Crook Zardari, President of Pakistan.
.
.
.
In his 12th visit to China, Clueless Billionaire Chamar Chaudi Chamcha Crook Zardari Bhen is obviously good at serving the JEWSA, since the American embassy next door to his Presidential Palace in Islamabad advises him everyday what he has to do and say for the USA, BUT when it comes to articulating and GRASPING Pakistan's strategic interests viz a vi CHINA, Zardari the Crook fails, as obviously revealed by this interview.
China can't wet nurse Pakistan, and its strategic needs, but that patriotic Pakistanis beyond the State Security apparatus need to look out for what is best for Pakistan. Pakistan lives in a tough neighborhood, BUT the situation is made a billion times worse by the actions of the Pakistani security State since 1951....with the guidance of the USA/UK.
.....here is a sympathetic, caring somewhat frustrated comment by Peter Chamberlain about Zardari's interview with a Chinese State broadcaster:
________________________
From therearenosunglasses.com:
[Like every typical Western politician, Zardari has mastered the art of answering by not answering. He drones on about the topic at hand, but he never really answers the interviewers questions. (a crook is a crook Pete, no matter how you dress it, or what title it is given...it will always be Mr. 10% looking out for number one, NOT Pakistan)
If Pakistan really hopes to pin its aspirations for future development on the Chinese, then Pres. Zardari must learn to sharpen his wits. There is a great difference between creating an impression and giving something of substance.
Pakistan must be able to develop its own "Wild West" and the Chinese are the only ones looking for development projects, who actually have a large stash of ready cash to do it with. (In addition to protecting Pakistan if the country is attacked by the whimsical USA)
From the questions delivered by the Chinese interviewer, which I understand had to come directly from the government, it is obvious that the answers he was looking for were the same ones that Zardari was trying to evade. (Sincerity with ones own good-wishers is wise, not smart sound bites written in the American embassy)
China is looking for reciprocity in the budding interstate relationship--Pakistan must actually reach-out, instead of just talk.
(Pakistan must send more of its security cadets for training in China, and no more to the USA; Pakistan must undertake significant joint military exercises with China in China and Pakistan; Pakistan must give China Gwadar as a naval base; Pakistan must increase the number of Chinese security personnel in Pakistan, and significantly reduce those of the West)
In the proposed rail and road links between them, China is looking to actually see projects on Pakistan's drawing board, something concrete, which can be funded and begun.]( I've been droning on about undertaking massive strategic projects in Pakistan since 1983.........as an irate teenager speaking with Pakistani officials at cultural functions......usually met with snobby "we know better beta....hush now" attitudes.
Ireland with a per capita income of $45,000 and a population of 3.5 million can survive with agricultural exports, and massive EU subsidies.
Kuwait with a population of 1.2 million Arab Kuwaitis and a per capita income of $36,000 can survive on mere oil exports.
Pakistan with a population of 190 million, and 400 million by 2050, and a per capita income of just $2,850 must invest SIGNIFICANTLY in INDUSTRY/MANUFACTURING and INFRASTRUCTURE....to provide jobs for the future generations, avoid further social disintegration, significantly lift the masses from poverty. Investment in areas which China has the know how and the cash.
Unfortunately the Pakistani elite, and the Middle class/lower Middle class Security State have absolute faith in Gora sahib especially from the USA/UK. Two countries which coincidentally have never undertaken ANY strategic projects in Pakistan NATURALLY.
In 1983 I was actually told by a PhD. government officer from Pakistan, "We don't want to develop too fast" those were his exact words....as he spurted out the words in an irritated, I know better manner. "Development was taking too fast under Ayub Khan....thats not good".
This is the same Ayub Khan, who enjoyed swimming pool sessions with Christine Keeler and John Perfumo at his private residence in the UK. The same Ayub Khan who rejected a generous offer by a Central European country to wholly fund, and build the country's first modest steel mill in Kalabagh....which has reportedly 10 billion tons of high quality iron ore, additionally utilizing Sindh's 175 billion tons of coal.
The JEWSA and Rothschilds UK have never been good for Pakistan, AND yet these are the two countries which the ruling elite put their greatest faith in.
Zardari is a puppet of the JEWSA, brought into power to implement the JEWSA policy with greater ease in Pakistan (destabilization of the country and psychological acceptance that the USA must invade Pakistan.......and there is nothing the Pakistan state can do about this given inevitable fact.) Zardari's reward is that he gets to loot Pakistan, with the military looking the other way.
Pakistan's modest budget of $32.5 billion for 2011--2012, covers debt repayment costs; subsidy costs, security costs.....but NO money left over for significant DEVELOPMENT in INDUSTRY/MANUFACTURING and INFRASTRUCTURE.
Pakistan is a Failed State whose levels of governance/government is very poor. The PPP economy is nearing $500 billion of which only $350 billion is registered as part of the official economy. Pakistan can theoretically have a budget of $150 billion annually with significant surplus funds for DEVELOPMENT in INDUSTRY/MANUFACTURING and INFRASTRUCTURE, ........BUT since Zardari the JEWSA puppet has other priorities, as with the Harijan Coolie Kuta Punjabi military (free military aid from the JEWSA....as long as it continues bashing its own people into infinity)......this great OPPORTUNITY of surplus national funds working with a sincere neighbor ally with the ability to deliver on strategic projects has never been fully utilized/realized.
Hence:
Pakistan produces 1.6 million tons of steel, when the country could easily produce 100 million tons.(Turkey 34, Iran 14, India 70, China 650)
Pakistan produces 90 billion Kwt hours of electricity, when it could be 300 Kwt hours. (Turkey 200, Iran 220, India 1000, China 4500)
Aug 25, 2011
Pakistan China strategic relations.
.
.
.
So the Punjabi Coolie Kuta's in Islamabad have sent a "Chosa Pudi" to China hoping that they will forgive and forget Pakistan's role in the Zing-yang riots.
How stupid.
Is it not better in the first place not to do ANY HARM to the best strategic ally of Pakistan for at least 40 years, rather than do the dirty for a few $ from gora sahib, and be exposed for it.
The long term solution to this, which has included attacks against Chinese workers working in strategic projects in Pakistan (biting the hand that feeds you as they say in English).......is:
1. Reign in Pakistan's vast security state, always looking for work...ANY WORK.
2. Make the ISI more accountable.
3. Investigate and reveal which government agencies were training and arming the terrorists in Sinkiang Province for the West, from Pakistan.
4. Reduce the number of Westerners in Pakistan, especially in sensitive areas such as the NWFP, Baluchistan and Gilgit/Baltitistan.
5. Lets have Chinese security based in Baluchistan, NWFP, places especially where China is carrying out strategic projects.
6. Conversely lets de-link Pakistan's security system from the West. If Pakistan has lost about $80 billion since 2001 economically by associating with Washington's GWoT, then from Pakistan's point of view it hasn't worked out too well...and counter measures and appraisal of the situation needs to be taken. Stock taking.
7. Pakistan is a failed state, and this implies that its institutions don't work, and thus are out of control. Can the budget of the military which unofficially consumes about 8% of the GDP be reduced, and the extra state resources which are freed directed towards civilian projects. CLEARLY the Pakistan military is not working for Pakistan's strategic interests, so why should they get a whopping 8 % share of the GDP..........what for? If they can't defend the sovereignty of the country; causes national humiliation and like a pagal kuta attacks Pakistan's best friend.
Absolutely stupid sending Shuja Pasha on a covert rescue mission to China after such a massive "strategic depth" blunder. The Sinkiang incident tells the Chinese that military run Pakistan is an insincere, unreliable ally.
____________________________
Pakistan, China ties are unique: Hina Rabbani Khar
Times of India.
(Pakistan has a "unique" relationship with the USA first and foremost, which provides up to $4 billion worth of military aid annually unofficially, AND in addition has thousands of security personnel in Pakistan, telling the Pakistanis what to do, and training their personnel....with the largest embassy in Islamabad right next to the Presidential palace. Most of the top brass of the Pakistani security have been trained in the USA, and security cooperation is still very extensive, and greater than the security cooperation with China CLEARLY.....given how often America's great and good visit Pakistan.
For Pakistan to have greater relations with China, the countries relationship with the USA would have to be reduced to a minimum, OTHERWISE CONFLICT OF INTEREST ISSUES ARISE.....where on the one hand China helps Pakistan generously, but on the other hand due to Washington's policy of using Islamists to destabilize various nations through "Operation Cyclone" .......against Iran, Afghanistan (Soviet Union) Central Asia, and China....since the late 1970's as per Brzezinski's "Grand Chess Board"....conflict of interests arises.
Pakistan just can't go on and on relying on good will begging missions in Saudi Arabia, The Gulf, Iran, China and the USA. It must choose sides.
My view is that Pakistan is better off relying 100% on China, and ditching the USA totally, AND improving relations with India in addition. Sooner the better.
"Chusa Pudi" with the nice smile and excellent Italian fashion sense, has no voice, and has no power to move such a significant strategic state policy.........India and China recognize this fact. In that sense Shah Mehmood Qureshi had greater integrity, standing and voice, but he was removed from his position on the orders of the USA government, and the puppet regime of Zardari complied meekly..."Acha Sahib."
Again "Chosa Pudi" is not going to be able to rectify the FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM OF Pakistan's FOREIGN POLICY....no matter how many times she smiles. The problem of a failed state; the problem of a powerful military which dictates FOREIGN and Security POLICY, though Hina thinks they don't.....and finally the Zardari government and the problems of having a Harijan Coolie Kuta billionaire crook running a puppet show government for the USA so that they are free to implement fundamentally anti-Pakistani state policy's which destabilizes and further fails the country.
After 10 years since 2001, or is it 60 years since 1951........this simple FACT, has not been grasped by our "strategic depth" generals)
Talking to media persons on arrival in Beijing, Khar said the leadership of both countries had invested immensely for the enhancement of existing strong bonds of friendship.
(China has given MORE since 1963, than Pakistan has ever offered to China. Dangerously some Harijan Coolie kuta's may think that China will just continue giving, so long as the military/ISI make the right 'strategic depth" calculations. This is the mentality of the beggar, and fraudulent scamster.
The imbalance of China/Pakistan relationship is partly due to China's need to contain India, especially after the 1962 war....BUT if India wisely rebuts Washington's insistence to act as an American poodle power which has been setup to fight China {aka Nazi Germany/Soviet Union 1941--1945, where both powers were built-up by NY/London ......per PROFESSOR ANTHONY C. SUTTON}........with an FTA between Chindia...greater diplomatic cooperation....India joins SCO.....greater security cooperation.....and China renounces it absurd claim for Arunchal Pradesh.....then Pakistan becomes less important for China, and most probably wise Indian strategic thinkers understand this simple fact. )
Khar arrived late Tuesday evening on a two-day visit at the invitation of her Chinese counterpart Yang Jiechi.
She said president Asif Ali Zardari was carrying forward the ties to new heights by frequently visiting China, reported Associated Press of Pakistan.
(Yes and he has been to the Gulf many times, and London...so what?)
Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani also paid several visits, she added.
She pointed out that Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's visit to Pakistan in December last year was historic as it helped in further enhancing the bilateral relations.
The foreign minister said the visit of Premier Wen played an important role in further deepening the the strong relationship.
Khar said: "The relationship strongly exists among peoples and governments of two countries and now we want to commensurate these ties with trade, economic and investment cooperation."
The foreign minister said China is one of the countries with which Pakistan has signed Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
She said the existing strong bonds of friendship between Pakistan and China was multi-faceted and covered all areas including defence, economic and trade ties.
"We have strategic and robust relations with China," she said.
At the Beijing Capital International Airport, Khar was received by Ambassador Masood Khan, senior diplomats from Pakistan Embassy and officials from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.
Earlier, talking to APP, Ambassador Masood Khan said that "this is a very important visit coming at a time when Pakistan and China enjoy enviable solidarity in all areas".
Khan pointed out that "the foreign minister's visit will help us consolidate our strong ties and steer them towards even deeper strategic and political engagement and more productive economic cooperation".
"It will be a meeting between time-tested and trusted friends and partners," Khan said, adding: "Naturally, regional and international situation will be reviewed by the two sides."
Symbolically too, Khan said, the visit is important because this will be Khar's first visit to China after assuming office.
Pakistan.
.
.
.
As I understand it Pakistan requires greater focus on economic development, which takes the country forward, NOT more American arms which sadly end up being used against the Pakistani people. Kiyani at least has paid lip service to this fact.
Pakistan requires the expulsion of ALL Western security advisers, and a significant reduction in the size of the American embassy.
Comments by Peter Chamberlain at Therearenosunglasses.com:
___________________________
You Will Accept Special Forces Trainers, Or Else.
[The delegation of old farts is in Islamabad trying one-on-one extortion/blackmail of the Pakistani government, seeking to force an opening for the re-penetration by pumped-up American killers. This can easily be compared to a violent rape of Pakistani leaders by an Imperialist aggressor. Pakistan has one chance to avoid Libya's fate, and that is through concentrated resistance of any military "assistance" from the West. When all the dust settles, we will either see a world subjugated by the American war machine, or a world liberated from the American Empire, depending upon how, or if, Eastern leaders like PM Gilani resist the assault.]
Restoration of military aid: United States offers quid pro quo

Prime Minister Gilani and US Senator Levin during a meeting at the PM House. PHOTO: PPI
The offer came from an influential US Democrat, Senator Carl Levin, at a meeting with Army chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani at the General Headquarters in Rawalpindi on Tuesday, a Pakistani official familiar with the development told The Express Tribune.
Leading a delegation of US congressmen, Senator Levin – who is the chairman of Senate’s Arms Services Committee – also held separate meetings with President Asif Zardari and Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, the official said Gen Kayani refused to review the decision anytime soon.
Pakistan Army expelled close to 100 US military trainers from the country in June in a show of displeasure over the Bin Laden raid. The Pakistani move, the US said, compelled it to withhold $800 million in military assistance.
At a meeting with the US delegation, President Zardari voiced concern over reports of the proposed cut in assistance for Pakistan. “Any cut in assistance would impact our existing economic conditions,” said an official statement quoting the president as telling the visiting US senators.
Zardari said the move would also send negative signals to the public about the US commitment to the people of Pakistan “when they are suffering heavily in economic terms due to unparalleled toll of the war against terror.”
The president hoped that all such steps would be avoided, the statement added.
President Zardari said drag on our relations due to operational irritants can effectively be avoided if the terms of engagements were clearly defined and followed in their true essence by the two countries.
In a meeting with Prime Minister Gilani, Senator Levin underlined the importance of bringing back US-Pakistan relations on even keel because both the countries are fighting the common enemy who is ‘using violence as IEDs.’
(Read: Pakistan key to regional economic integration, says US)
According to an official handout, Premier Gilani expressed reservations over the failure of the US-led Nato troops to stop infiltration of militants at the Pak-Afghan border.
“One wonders how terrorists dare go to Afghanistan without being eliminated by the Isaf and Nato Forces which are equipped with the most advanced weapons,” Gilani asked.
He underscored the importance of relations between the US and Pakistan to go beyond terrorism and cover other areas of bilateral relations on durable basis for the benefit of people of both countries.
Published in The Express Tribune
Aug 18, 2011
With country going to the dogs, fresh elections urgently needed.
.
.
.
Billionaire crook ex-con is never going to go for early elections, because he knows that given his record he will never be elected for a second term even with the help of the ISI, AND more than likely he will lose his leadership position within the PPP in addition (his own party never liked him for obvious reasons). He needs the next 18 months to loot the country further, and thus in the process make the country far worse. Therefore greater hartals need to be established in front of parliament and by the Presidents residence for fresh elections in Islamabad.......non-stop, until Zardari gives way.
Zardari has lost his legitimacy by creating a royal mess in Pakistan, AND by acting as a powerless front for the actions of the Pakistan military with their misadventures within Pakistan's SECURITY and FOREIGN POLICY ARENA.
The Americans will do their best to maintain the $3 billionaire chore crook ex-con in power as long as possible. Each time he smiles and steals from Pakistan's coffers they feel warm and reassured.
Sharif needs to do a heck of a lot more populist canvassing across Pakistan with the media, and move his backside out of his cushy haveli.....as with Imran Khan.
Time for Zardari bhen to go.
_____________________________
Sharif for fresh polls in Pakistan
PTI and Times of India.Sharif said the government has disappointed the people and a fresh mandate is necessary now.
This is the first time that Sharif has called for fresh polls, though other leaders of his PML-N party have often said that the country's problems, including corruption and the perceived inefficiency of the Pakistan People's Party-led government, can only be resolved through mid-term elections.
The two-time premier and PML-N president told Geo News channel that he had advised President Asif Ali Zardari four months ago to hold fresh elections. "It was a sincere advice but President Zardari turned down the proposal," he said.
Pakistan is facing problems like lawlessness, power outages, price hike and unemployment and fresh elections alone are the solution to these issues, Sharif said.
He said Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani could dissolve the National Assembly or lower house of parliament and announce fresh elections just as he (Sharif) had done in 1993 when he was the premier.
The PPP-led government has rejected similar demands from other opposition parties and said fresh elections will be held in early 2013 after it completes its five-year term.
Sharif has been critical of the government's policies since he pulled the PML-N out of the ruling coalition in 2008 but never sought fresh polls.
The PML-N had joined the government after the 2008 general election in the national interest but could not go along with the PPP because of its policies, he said.
Aug 13, 2011
Pakistan Zindabad!
.
.
.
It is a great day for Pakistan.
14th August is the day of independence from British Imperialism.
It is also good because of a court verdict in Karachi........when the Pakistani legal justice system in a small incremental way brought to justice criminal murdering gangs of the Pakistani armed forces.
Now what is required is Public Interest Block actions on behalf of the poor, innocent defenseless Pakistanis in the NWFP, and the families of the victims where 2,200 civilians have died for being at the wrong place at the wrong time....just so that the JEWSA could carry out its high tech psych-ops war, for an eventual attack against Pakistan.
Now what is required is Public Interest Block actions on behalf of the poor, innocent defenseless Pakistanis in the country who since 2001 have been disappeared by the ISI.
Now what is required is Public Interest Block actions on behalf of the poor, innocent defenseless Pakistanis in the country who had suffered under the illegal rule of General Musharaf's American backed military dictatorship between 1999---2008.
In small manageable lawful ways the Pakistani military which controls Pakistan's SECURITY and FOREIGN policy can be brought under civilian control, a simple feat which the great Turkish people have accomplished...............through the Ergenekon trials, involving as many as 42 generals from the Turkish military.
The Pakistani military will respond of course by destabilizing Pakistan further, and Karachi of course.
_____________________________
Pakistani soldier sentenced to death for murder
By Times of India.A Pakistani court on Friday found a paramilitary soldier guilty of murder and sentenced him to death for killing an unarmed man at point blank range in an incident caught on camera in a public park.
It marked the first time that a civilian court in Pakistan has sentenced to death a serving member of the military.
Although the Rangers paramilitary technically comes under the supervision of the interior ministry, it is considered part of the powerful armed forces, which has ruled the country for more than half its existence.
The June 8 killing of Sarfaraz Shah, 22, was filmed by a cameraman and broadcast on television, sparking a backlash over the brutality of trained officers in a country awash with violence blamed on the Taliban and al-Qaida.
Judge Bashir Ahmed Khoso read out the verdict before an anti-terrorism court in Karachi, finding Shahid Zafar guilty of pulling the trigger, and sentenced him to death and a fine of 200,000 rupees ($2,300).
"The crime of killing Sarfraz Shah has been proved against you and I announce the death sentence and also impose a fine of 200,000 rupees," said Khoso, addressing the 35-year-old Zafar.
He handed life terms to five other paramilitary soldiers and a civilian who had accused Shah of robbery and dragged him over to them. The judge ordered each to pay 100,000 rupees to the victim's family.
The verdict concludes a relatively swift trial which got underway after the seven defendants were formally charged with murder and terrorism on June 29, just weeks after the killing.
There was a euphoric reaction from the prosecution and the victim's family, but the defence vowed to appeal the sentences.
"The decision is historic, it shows no one is above the law," government prosecutor Mohammed Khan Buriro told reporters.
"The Rangers as an institution was not involved in the murder, and it proved in the court proceedings it was the culprits' own act," he said.
"My family is extremely relieved with the verdict. We have got justice," said Salik Shah, brother of the victim.
So extreme was the public and media reaction to the killing that the government also took the rare step of removing the provincial chiefs of police and Rangers in Karachi.
The widely-aired footage of the killing showed a clean-shaven and unarmed Shah, wearing black trousers and a navy shirt, pleading for his life before he is shot twice.
He then begs for help while the soldiers appear to do nothing but watch him lapse gradually into unconsciousness.
Despite no evidence in the video that Shah was armed, Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik, whose ministry is responsible for the Rangers, had claimed that the victim had been carrying an unlicensed weapon.
The killings last month by security forces of five unarmed Chechens, one of them a pregnant woman, in the city of Quetta are also under investigation.
Answerable to the interior ministry, more than 10,000 paramilitary troops patrol Karachi, Pakistan's financial capital, and its surroundings to combat routine ethnic, political and Islamist violence in the city of 16 million.
Human rights activists condemned Shah's killing and complain that the Rangers, established for combat and border duty, are neither equipped nor trained for civilian areas.
Aug 4, 2011
Failed State Pakistan should not have a nuclear weapons program
.
.
.
Sensible proposal and move by the USA government.
Perhaps this policy will be linked to a significant cut in the security aid to Pakistan from the official $2.7 billion annual military aid to zero, if the Pakistani military do not abide by this.
The ordinary Pakistani people need bread not bombs.
Pakistan USA heading towards confrontation over N-arms issues.
By Anwar Iqbal of The Dawn Newspaper.

The UN General Assembly in New York next month will be the venue for this new push, said the reports.—AFP photo
The United States and Pakistan are heading towards yet another confrontation, perhaps consequentially more devastating than all previous disputes, as the Obama administration prepares to persuade Islamabad to halt the production of nuclear bomb materials.
Recent reports in the US media suggest that the UN General Assembly in New York next month will be the venue for this new push and the US has the blessings of four declared nuclear powers for its move.
Also on Wednesday, the NBC News channel reported that the US was preparing for “the worst-case scenario of attempting to snatch Pakistan`s 100-plus nuclear weapons if it feared they were about to fall into the wrong hands”.
The channel quoted former president Pervez Musharraf as warning that this “would be a disastrous miscalculation, as such an incursion would lead to `total confrontation` between the United States and Pakistan”.
Current and former US officials, however, told NBC News that “ensuring the security of Pakistan`s nuclear weapons has long been a high national security priority, even before the Sept 11 terrorist attacks, and that plans have been drawn up for dealing with worst-case scenarios in Pakistan”.
But the expected confrontation in New York has nothing to do with any secret plan to snatch Pakistan`s nukes. The United States will launch an open move – with support from other powers – to force Pakistan to sign the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty.
The US media reported that the Obama administration had won China`s support for finalising the FMCT. At a recent conference in Paris, Russia, France and Britain – all declared nuclear powers like China – also supported the US plan.
It is, however, not clear if China would back the move to cap Pakistan`s nuclear capability and thus allow India to become the sole nuclear power in South Asia.
The US and its allies are seeking an agreement by September and then go to the UN General Assembly with a joint plan for starting talks on the FMCT.
So far Pakistan has successfully resisted all international pressure to endorse the FMCT, warning that it would boycott any process to negotiate a US-backed treaty outside the deadlocked UN Conference on Disarmament (UNCD).
The Geneva-based UNCD is the sole negotiating forum for multilateral disarmament but the treaty has been stalled in the conference for 12 years, with Pakistan as the sole holdout against negotiations.
The US move aims at creating a new forum where it can persuade Pakistan to sign the FMCT.
“Our preference is to negotiate an FMCT within the Conference on Disarmament, but that body has been deadlocked by Pakistan,” US Under-secretary of State Ellen Tauscher told a seminar on July 28 in Lafayette, California.
“Thus the US is joining with other key countries to start preparations for a Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty elsewhere until the conference can get down to work,” she said. Pakistan`s acting representative to the UN, Raza Bashir Tarar, last week told a General Assembly meeting in New York that his country “will not join any such process nor would it consider accession to the outcome of any such process”.
To deal with increasing international pressure to stop the production of fissile material, Pakistan tried unsuccessfully to enter into a nuclear agreement with the US similar to the one Washington has signed with India. The deal with the US has paved the way for India to get recognition as a nuclear power without signing the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
The United States has rejected Pakistan`s request, pointing out that the discovery of a network of nuclear proliferates, headed allegedly by Dr A. Q. Khan, disqualifies Pakistan for any deal.
(in addition the Pakistan military since the 1970's has trained up to 500,000 Jihadis within Pakistan with ops. against Afghanistan, Iran, CHINA, INDIA, and Bangladesh......the Pakistan military runs Pakistan's FOREIGN and SECURITY POLICY, not the civilian Zardari government.
Pakistan is regarded by some to be the most dangerous terrorist hub in the world, and has a "Deep State" which is out of control of even the military high command.
Finally Pakistan is a FAILED STATE, which has enormous poverty and therefore the Pakistan military should not be spending precious resources on wasteful nuclear arms)
Jul 13, 2011
Altaf Hussein's wrong assessment.
.
.
.
Just maybe, Altaf Hussein is out of touch with Pakistani politics living as he does in exile in London for so many years.
Does he seriously think that a military coup will solve Pakistan's problems?
Does the shameful events of Abbottabad mean nothing to him?
Does the events of The Mehran naval base mean nothing to him?
Has he never wondered why Sindh, Baluchistan, East Pakistan and the NWFP experience such bloody political turmoil involving the military and OTHERWISE...................but rarely the Punjab?
Has he never heard of the word destabilization? How military people destabilize civilian governments so that they can declare marshal law, and takeover? Does he not know what happened in 1958, 1977, 1999?
Has Altaf Hussein even thought of the possibility that what is going on in Karachi NOW may be a distraction by the military to deflect negative attention away from their failures, which has become so widespread/popular throughout Pakistan?
Has Altaf Hussein even heard of the Swat Taliban numbering 3000, who in 2009 were threatening to take over the whole country, unopposed by the Pakistan military, armed with just ak-47? Was there a remote possibility that the Swat Taliban was a destabilization operation run by the Pakistan military?
Has Altaf Hussein even heard of the ISI set up by the British in 1948....who since the 1970's have trained up 500,000 Jihadis with ops against Sufis, Shia, Ahmedis, Christians, India, Afghanistan, and Iran?
Does Altaf Hussein seriously think amoral billionaire crook Zardari, brought into power by the Pakistani military after they killed Benazir will seriously challenge the Pakistan military? His only concern is money and loot surely.
Doesn't Altaf Hussein not know that it is the Pakistan military which currently runs Pakistan's foreign and SECURITY policy, AND any failure on these two front's is the failure of the Pakistan military.
Doesn't Altaf Hussein know that the JEWSA has always been the biggest arms donor to the Pakistan military, greater than any other nation by 10, SO if the JEWSA criticizes the Pakistan military NOW then from their perspectives isn't there something seriously wrong with the Pakistan military?
Does Altaf Hussein think it goes against the tenets of Islam to criticize the Pakistan military?
Does Altaf Hussein think criticizing the Pakistan military is a no-go taboo subject?
Does Altaf Hussein think the Pakistani military are filled with men that can count their descendants from the heirs of Akbar the Great, Babur, Alauddin Khilji, or Muhammad bin Tughluq. .......who thus epitomize martial perfection, prowess and IZZAT?
____________________
Opposition Figure: Pakistani Govt, US Conspiring Against Military
High Profile MQM Conference Leads to Condemnation of Zardari Govt
Altaf Hussein, the founder and leader of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), has a history of condemning the Zardari government, but today used a high profile party conference to accuse the civilian government of secretly being in league with the US to undermine the nation’s military.
Hussein cited recent “conspiratorial behavior” by the government, particularly in its actions in Karachi, as evidence of his allegations. MQM is a hugely powerful party in Karachi, and recent political violence in Karachi has centered around tit-for-tat attacks between them and the ANP, a faction allied with Zardari’s Pakistani People’s Party.
Last year, Hussein responded to a split between MQM and the PPP to call for a military coup and the declaration of martial law on the grounds of growing corruption among the government’s officials. He condemend US support for the government then as well.
Hussein’s comments reflect growing discord between the civilian government and the military, both of which seem to be losing credibility at an alarming rate in the wake of the nation’s unpopular involvement in the US wars in the region and both of which are keen to deflect blame.
Jul 10, 2011
Whose going to save Pakistan from the colonial Raj military?
.
.
.
It is indeed sad that there is such indiscriminate killing in Karachi and the North West Frontier, overseen as they are by the Pakistan military. Such destabilization programs don't happen in the Punjab obviously since the military is run by the Punjabis.
For stability and peace to come to Pakistan the Pakistan military has to be neutered completely.
Then COMPLETELY circumcised from their gora pudi masters.
ONLY a strong civilian government can do this.
The Pakistan military is run by lower middle class Harijan Coolie Kuta's from the Punjab......It was one great philosopher from the West who acutely observed that the lower middle class are the most dangerous class, since they harbor the ambitions of the elite, but have the habits and thought patterns of the working class.
The Pakistan military strategically, with their "strategic depth theory" is the biggest threat to Pakistan as mentioned on this blog millions of times.....such points have to be memorized into media sound bites by natural patriotic leaders of the country.
Nawaz Sharif step forward for your country! Don't save yourself for 2013, by then it will be too late.

Shabana Azmi as Imran Khan? Why not in a New Goondawood flick.
_________________________
Imtiaz Ahmad at The Hindustan Times
In May this year, Imran Khan’s party — the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) decided to hold a dharna (sit-in) outside the Karachi port to block NATO supplies to Afghanistan on the grounds that Pakistan should stop supporting the US in the region. The dharna was a huge success by PTI standards as 7,000 persons turned up.
(Naturally it is not in Pakistan's interests to supply the 250,000 foreign troops and mercenaries in Afghanistan, as it means destabilization of Pakistan from Afghanistan....AND continued yearly serious accusations against Pakistan, justified and unjustified by the USA. When ALL the foreign troops go from Afghanistan, Pakistan will be a little bit more peaceful especially in Baluchistan, where insurgents in the province are backed by various entities from Afghanistan, AND the NWFP...again where various entities from Afghanistan back insurgent groups in that province........though SAD that it is ONLY a right-wing party with only one seat in parliament that is calling for cutting of supplies to the foreign occupation of Afghanistan. It would be far more appropriate if ALL parties across the political spectrum of Pakistan called for complete cutting of supplies to foreign occupation forces in Afghanistan.
Further since the occupation of Afghanistan by foreign gora troops, Afghan heroin/opium production have skyrocketed, and massive quantities of Afghan heroin have ended up in Pakistan creating social and political instability......very few political personalities talk about this aspect of the foreign occupation of Afghanistan. Forget the Pakistan military.
Massive amounts of Afghan heroin goes into Iran with 3 million addicts, where the nation is building a huge security wall/fence costing billions of $ in its Eastern border with Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the loss of 4000 security personnel since 2001 fighting the heroin traffickers from Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Afghan heroin goes into Central Asia, Ukraine and Russia resulting in the deaths of millions of people. It is a genocide, but since the government in Russia is Jewish controlled this quiet genocide is not actioned upon, or seriously addressed, or even mentioned. Instead the Jewish controlled Russian government assists the foreign occupation troops in Afghanistan!!!!!! So that they can kill more Russians.
Afghan heroin goes into the UK, where the UK military uses its C-130 planes to smuggle heroin into the country. The UK military flying into military bases don't have to declare anything or clear customs. Ditto the American military and their heroin operations in North America.
The Pakistan people would be doing a great service to the Duniya if they stopped the supply route to the foreign occupation forces in Afghanistan, who in reality are there harvesting opium/heroin using the hapless Afghan people as mules, and the country as one giant East India Company 18th century plantation.)
What people did not realise is that most of those in attendance were from different religious parties — including the right-wing Sunni Tehreek which earlier this year supported the killing of Punjab governor Salmaan Taseer and minorities minister Shahbaz Bhatti.
(uncivilized, law of the jungle politics.......Islamic Fundamentalism will destroy Pakistan, and is not the solution to Pakistan's multi-layered complex problems. This is not what Jinnah wanted. Closed shop narrow discourse which is slavishly loyal to the Pakistani military without question is to say the least bad for Pakistan.......the JEWSA got into Afghanistan using Islamists such as the Taliban and "al-Qaeda" AND the whoring services of the Pakistan military....and using them against Gaddafi in Libya NOW, and in Syria, in Yemen...and Egypt.
In 63 years of stop start civilian rule the Islamists have NEVER done well electorally, and should be kept at arms length by the mainstream parties. ALL ISLAMIST parties must be treated as fronts of the Pakistani military and their power base.)
The positive in this is that, although no NATO supply tankers were stopped or delayed, with the dharna staged successfully in terms of numbers of people attending, Imran Khan’s political future seems to have brightened.
(From one seat in parliament to eventually running the country in possible mid-term elections?? seems a stretch.......his good looking, is a media personality, is Punjabi with Pashtun lineage, he is right-wing so obviously appeals to certain elements in the military.
On the other hand, he's making the right noises, doing the right things, and is not linked to the establishment obviously, otherwise he'd have more money and more seats in parliament......but represents a certain urban middle class voice.
As a important, albeit unrepresented VOICE for Pakistanis, he needs to pull about a 1000 media stunts around the country non-stop, peacefully and continue with his good work until elections arise. Maybe in the future one day he can lead the country, but he's got a lot of work to do, and he needs to find patriotic Pakistani sponsors who are filthy rich, without selling himself and the country out in order to get a few more rupees.....in elections in South Asia, its just not about speeches, but about money ultimately. Congress is in power in India because it spent the most money, AND not because its the best party for India)
Post al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, things are looking bright for the former cricketer and playboy.
His anti-American rhetoric coupled with his ambiguous stand on the Taliban has won him the support of the ultra-right, while at the same time, his unending tirade against corruption continues to gain him followers from the middle and lower income groups.
(Wholesome stuff that needs to be translated into policy papers which are easy to follow. This is what Sheikh Mujibur Rahman did after he was released by the military government in the late 1960's. Its ALL good that he is pointing out ALL the problems of the country in rallies and in the media, that allows him to connect with the aam admi of Pakistan......but he also has to come out with clear cut solutions of what HIS VISION FOR Pakistan is which will make things better)
What is interesting, say political observers, is that as relations between the army and mainstream political parties deteriorate, Khan appears have become more acceptable to the men in uniform.
(He's Punjabi, good looking, politically naive in the sense that he has not exercised power...though he has been in politics for a over a decade, and therefore the military think they can manage him as a potential future leader, just as they did Benazir Bhutto 1988---1990, 1993--1996......but did not trust her for the Third Term. The military recognize the cold fact that billionaire crook Zardari even in Purduh is a "no sell" to the Pakistani people and cannot be kept indefinitely in power, WHILST the Pakistani military exercise REAL power in Pakistan and fuck the country up even further. Zardari has to go soon, so the military are groping around for another political civilian front to cover their real power.
Has Imran Khan criticized pointedly and directly the Pakistan military???? There is absolutely no point in seeking power in Pakistan unless as a civilian leader the first thing you do is neuter the Pakistan military.....and second cut their linkage with the gora pudi powers)
“Imran Khan is talking in a language that the army wants to hear. He is talking about the good Taliban and the bad Taliban. He is critical of the United States and is taking a stand on the drone attacks. He is attacking the main political parties. And he is flirting with the religious parties,” says Rana Sanaullah, a key figure in the PML-N party.
(NOT GOOD......there is no good Taliban, only bad....created by the JEWSA in 1994, using the Pakistan military as "Controlled Opposition". Islamic fundamentalism is not the way forward for Pakistan if it wants to be a modern Liberal Democratic state which is industrialized and respected internationally, and prosperous. You cannot use religion to run a country.. doesn't work----look at Iran)
Political parties are increasingly becoming critical of the armed forces — that too in public discourse. PML-N leader Nawaz Sharif has asked the army chief and the ISI head to step down as they have “no moral authority to head the armed forces after the Bin Laden and Mehran base debacle.” Sharif is not alone in his criticism. There is a rising demand for more accountability of the military and for political overview of the armed forces.
(Naturally! He's the man.......how can Harijan Coolie pudi sala, Assfuck Kiyani and his sidekick Suja Pash still be in power after what happened in Abbottabad especially? That operation was carried out by the SSG for the JEWSA, and Obama's re-election campaign.....AND then Assfuck Kiyani and Suja Pasha stood to attention whilst the JEWSA gloated over the killing of Osama, taking credit for it......AND insulting the Pakistani military by saying that, ""The Pakistani military has been humbled"(Mullen) and "We can attack any part of Pakistan at any time in the future" (Mullen/Gates Freudian slip).......ie..Mehran naval base attack.
Either the above, or the fairy tale that the America's came ALL the way from Afghanistan on a hour flight, undetected into a garrison town which is heavily militarized being near the Indian border, ALL the radar switched off, and ALL the garrison men sound asleep for 1 whole hour, including 25% of the military who would be on night duty, whilst the Americans shot up Osama's compound......AND then took him away on a further one hour return flight to Afghanistan.
A Hollywood movie is coming out soon!!!!!
Assfuck Kiyani and Shuja Pasha and the particular SSG unit which carried out the fake raid for the JEWSA COMMITTED treason against Pakistan. Commited treason in carrying out a fake raid for the Obama and the JEWSA. Commited treason for allowing the JEWSA to insult the Pakistani military, whilst remaining silent)
President Asif Ali Zardari seems to be playing both sides. He accuses Sharif of inciting dissent in the armed forces and trying to promote extremist elements within the army. But he has successfully pushed for greater powers for the prime minister and supremacy of parliament.
(Billionaire crook Zardari is guided by the American embassy on his daily visits there next door to the Presidential palace.....lets not anoint him with special political wisdom and acumen where non exist....ditto ManMohan Singh through Sonia, though obviously as yet no signs that MMS is a billionaire crook.
As to whether he has successfully pushed for greater powers for the PM position, and the supremacy of parliament...I doubt it. On security and foreign policy, by the overt actions of the state, it is still the Pakistan military which is dictating policy)
Last month, finance minister Dr Hafeez Shaikh promised more details of military spending in the coming budget and let out that it is “government policy to ensure there are more answers being given by the GHQ.” Till now, the army leadership has brushed aside civilian interference in its affairs.
(Thats why Assfuck Kiyani's and Suja's Pasha's service terms were extended? Or was it based on the advice of foreign entities)
Setting the mood in what can be seen as a policy shift, ISI chief General Ahmed Shuja Pasha gave a closed door briefing to parliament on the Abbottabad incident.
(OK kiddies yaar here is the daily Kabor....one day there was this sleepy little military town known as Abottabad, now children do you know where Abbottabad is?)
This was followed by a fiery question and answer session in which Pasha exchanged hot words with opposition leader Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan. In many ways, the army seems on the defensive. On the other hand — as seen in the Saleem Shahzad killing — old habits die hard. But there are some who still defend the actions of the men in khaki. One of them is Imran Khan.
(Not good)
When asked, Khan suggested that the Shahzad killing may have been an attempt to tarnish “the good name of the military.” He called it a conspiracy at a time when all other political leaders demanded a commission of inquiry be constituted with a Supreme Court judge as its head.
Journalist Shamimur Rehman says that the recent popularity of Khan’s dharna suggests that he is being backed in his political ambitions by a third force. “This is not new in Pakistan. Ironically, the army’s biggest critic, Sharif, also enjoyed military patronage in his early political career,” adds Rehman.
Some wonder what the next stage for Khan may be. The army’s relations with political parties continue to deteriorate. Zardari is trying to build bridges only because army backing is needed for him to continue to stay in power. There are complications here as well. “This is a party that the army traditionally distrusts because of its secular credentials,” says Kamran Shafi, a political analyst and former military officer.
As a grand opposition alliance comes into being this month, there are expectations that the political temperature in the country will rise. On the one hand will be the ruling party and its reluctant ally, the PML-Q party, which owes its existence to General Musharraf. On the other would be the PML-N and the MQM, two major political forces which represent the urban centres in Punjab and Sindh provinces.
(AND The next government in Pakistan ...........inshalah!)
As has been the case in the past, there is a likely scenario that the army would come to the rescue of the government if the situation becomes critical. Such a situation was seen in 2009 when a long march by the PML-N almost shut down Punjab province and forced Zardari to reinstate the chief justice. That deal was brokered at the prodding of the army chief, say insiders.
Such history may be repeated. Analysts say that Imran Khan is now being seen as the “reserve candidate” of the army high command. Acceptable to both right and left, Khan may be installed as a compromise prime minister if political forces are unable to reach a compromise. Ruling party figures say that such a possibility would be “unacceptable” to them.
“The thought seems ludicrous,” says information minister Firdous Ashiq Awan. However, stranger things have happened in Pakistan’s political history. And with corruption becoming a national topic of debate, such a proposal seems to be gaining ground in many areas of Pakistan.
(If Imran Khan's Insaaf (Justice party) has only one seat now, and in the next mid-term elections he suddenly has enough seats to form a government then a "soft coup" will have been conducted by the Pakistan military (ISI).........just as the PPP under Zardari was brought into power in 2008, after they murdered Benazir.....Benazir in her Third Term would have been too smart for the military. She would have been too familiar with their tricks of the trade.)