Mar 1, 2010

Yes its the elite AND the military.

.
.
.
.



Cool sinister chain smoking Kianni of the ISI, brain washed in the USA. During his tenure as head of the ISI you can imagine what criminality took place in Pakistan, AND is taking place now.



An excellent article which
deconstructs the myth of Indian arms in Swat, and defacto claims of an Indian hand in the training of the TTP from their "numerous" consulates in Afghanistan....actually 4 in the 1960's, and still four now.

India is not massively destabilizing Pakistan through Taliban proxies, these are lies propagated by the Pakistan military, as this article HERE from a rational thinking Pakistani quite clearly shows.

Besides the corrupt elite, the main danger and threat to Pakistan's viability is the Pakistan military with their various covert operations both within Pakistan and outside of Pakistan. The key decisions and actions of the Pakistan military since the 1950's has led to the Failed State situation of Pakistan presently.

The Pakistan military is the number one threat to Pakistan.




The Pakistan military created and set up the Swat Taliban, as I said over a year ago.........Afghan Taliban don't cover their faces, because why should they, they are fighting for their country.....and they are proud of this fact. On the other hand a good deal of the Swat Taliban did cover their faces......why this little girl ashamed behavior? Because many of them were from the Pakistan military.


The Afghan Taliban welcome the attention of the Pakistan media, because the more attention they get in Pakistan especially, the more volunteers, money, and publicity will flow in their direction......for all counter-insurgency groups the host media is an important part of winning their war; This basic rule of counter-insurgency did not apply to the Swat Taliban. The Swat Taliban shunned media attention from Pakistani journalists; The Pakistani military later reinforced that by declaring Swat a no go area; The Swat Taliban had free rein of the radio airwaves until the end; the Swat Taliban by contrast killed Pakistani journalists.......why? Because a good seasoned Pakistani journalist would have smelled the real situation in the Swat Valley, without the benefit of military briefings.

3,000 "Swat Taliban" marching undefeated towards Islamabad, remember last year? And the 800,000 Pakistan military backed by 300,000 paramilitary couldn't stop them. Does this sound real? Obviously not. The Swat Taliban's mission for the Pakistan military was to march towards Islamabad, just close enough....where upon the Pakistan military would step in to "save" the nation from the weak incompetent politicians.

America and Hilary Clinton had other plans, and gave the Pakistan military its marching orders, and lo in complete reverse the Pakistan military found the resolve to "fight" in inverted commas, their created proxies.......the USA had created an aid packages totaling $25 billion for Pakistan in the coming years (USA loans, WB, IMF etc), not just so that the Pakistan military could step in through a defacto coup, and lord over such huge aid funds. Though I fear in truth most of the victims of that particular military operation were in fact hapless Pakistani civilians.

Pakistan does need saving from weak, corrupt, criminal, incompetent politicians, BUT NOT in THIS WAY.......one wrong corrected by a bigger wrong does not make a right........only defers the main problem further down the line.


Now you know who is behind ALL terrorist ops in Pakistan, especially in the NWFP.



If we remember the actions of the Pakistani military which led to 3,000,000 civilian deaths, 10,000,000 million refugees into India, and 500,000 rapes in East Pakistan.

If we remember the actions of the Pakistani military which led to 50,000--100,000 deaths in Baluchistan between 1973--1977.

It is quite simply the worst military in the world, which has a strong track record of fighting its most vicious and aggressive wars against its own people.



Which then begs the question, is the Pakistan military a real national defense force which protects the people or country, for which the brow beaten Pakistani citizen pays its salary, or is it a subversive anti-state tool which serves the interests of a narrow elite based in the Punjab and other foreign entities abroad, in the USA especially?


























Some simple questions ordinary Pakistanis must ask when they pay the salary of the Pakistan military. ALL feelings of awe and deference for the Pakistan military must be removed first:

1. The Afghan Taliban is run by the Pakistani military to achieve "strategic depth" in Afghanistan for Pakistan. This "strategic depth" idea was given to them by the USA administration in 1993/1994 by Sandy Berger and other Jews visiting Benazirs Pakistan. In Pakistan the elite don't filter any ideas that come from the USA....they just say "acha sahib". The Pakistan military created the reality of the Taliban and hand picked mullah Omer, provided them with arms, training, men from the regular Pakistan military and especially the ISI, disguised as Taliban (remember Swat Taliban.....this stuff is bread and butter to the Pakistan military). The Taliban is Pakistan's proxy army in Afghanistan.

Couple of Questions:

(i) How many Pakistani civilians must be sacrificed in order to protect the Afghan Taliban in Pakistan, whilst the Americans pursue them into Pakistan with drones and other such action?


(ii) What destabilizing effects will a Taliban government in Kabul have on Pakistan, if they ever get back into power eventually?


(iii) Why did the Pakistan military choose the lowest common denominator from Afghanistan, in the form of the Taliban (formerly psycho Hekmatyar) to lead, and spearhead a critically important strategic mission for Pakistan costing $ billions to represent Pakistan's interests in Afghanistan? Can fundies of this type be taken out of the box, used and be put into the box again, just like that?


(iv) Could the slippery ever unreliable whimsical Americans (Ayub, Zia, Musharaf with said experience) use the excuse of the presence of the Afghan Taliban in Quetta to attack Pakistan, AND was this their original goal when they requested the Pakistan military to set up the Afghan Taliban for them in 1994? Using Islamic Fundamentalists as a fifth column to both destabilize certain countries, then deligitimate them, and then invade them, and occupy them.
Was that why Osama was allowed to escape to Pakistan in 2001 from Tora Bora?

(v) The Pakistan military know "al-Qaeda" does not exist, so why do the Pakistan military continue maintaining this myth? Who benefits from this myth? Israel, maybe Likud Israel, but how does Pakistan benefit, beyond the negative attention of the USA? Osama died in 2001, so why doesn't the Pakistan military say so clearly? (Press conference: Major General Athar..."We have clear evidence that OBL has passed away............." Why does the Pakistan military maintain and support Israel's security perspectives around GWoT and the "al-Qaeda"?

(vi) The Americans have been launching drones into sovereign Pakistani territory in pursuit of "al-Qaeda" and also against the Pakistan controlled Taliban............how long is this going to go on for? Into 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019? When is the actual cut off date and cessation of these drone attacks? 95% of the victims of these drone attacks are civilian Pakistani nationals.......what compensation does the Pakistani or American governments actually pay for the victims of these attacks? Is the life of a Pakistani national not worth anything for the Pakistan military? If the Pakistan military don't value Pakistani civilian lives, why should the Americans working on the direction of Israel? Why should the Americans value and respect Pakistani military men for that matter, or are we saying the Pakistani military institution is a separate entity from the Pakistani people? What if the Americans decide to spread the drone attack to other cities like Quetta, what will the Pakistan military do? How will it respond?

(vii) If Pakistan has been harmed by the USA, and the majority of Pakistanis know this to be the fact, why do the Pakistani military have a different perspective on this simple common logic and fact in contrast to the common man? On what basis is Pakistan cooperating with the USA, that has meaningful benefits for Pakistan in the realm of security? How long will Pakistan continue with civil wars on its own people just to please America? Is the American presence and influence in Pakistan increasing or decreasing? Is Pakistan's dependency on America increasing or decreasing? What would happen to Pakistan's integrity if Pakistan increased its reliance on China and India, over and above the USA?

(viii) Why does the Pakistani military have the dubious distinction of killing more of its own citizens then any other military on earth (East Pakistan: 3,000,000. Baluchistan: 50,000---100,000. NWFP: 20,000---30,000) Why does the Pakistan military always fights its best, most vicious and longest wars against its own people? What can we say about such a military?

(IX) What qualifications does the Pakistani military have of running Pakistan, which they are now doing from the back seat? The Pakistan military have killed millions of innocent civilian Pakistanis, and have been responsible for the biggest failures of the state to date............but other than these illustrious records, what other distinction do the Pakistan military have for running Pakistan?

(x) This sorts out the coolie chamar chaudis from the rest......if you are given $30 billion worth of arms, most of which is second hand, surplus stuff..................................... OR no foreign military aid (At least not from the USA), so you are left to develop your own arms industry over 60 years slowly steadily, AND enjoy full independence from a foreign power, where you exist in a modicum of dignity, AND enjoy political stability domestically (Foreign power has minimal influence internally.....small embassy....5 staff; no NGO's, no foreign aid)..........which one do you think the chamar coolie chaudis will choose TIME AND AGAIN........since 1950?