.
.
.
Thomas Malthus: The Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus FRS (13 February 1766 – 23 December 1834), was a British scholar, influential in political economy and demography Malthus has become widely known for his theories concerning population, and its increase or decrease in response to various factors. The six editions of his Principles of Population, published from 1798 to 1826, observed that sooner or later population gets checked by famine, disease, and widespread mortality.
Naturally within the confines of Victorian values and Victorian rationality his ideas became very popular with certain sections of the British elite to this day, and their peculiar skewered interpretations of his pseudo-science theory........And so unfortunately the concept of the Malthusian model ONLY applied to "Other" people from the British elite perspective, other than the British race.
Whilst Britain's population rapidly expanded from 10 million in 1800, to 20 million in 1850, to 44 million in 1914, to 61 million in 2010; increasing to a very crowded 70 million by 2036, despite massive emigration to the colonies of South Africa, Australia, New Zealand Canada and the USA......The Malthusian model was never critically applied to Britain. Instead as with so many loopy theories, it was applied indirectly against subject races within the British empire in places such as Ireland where in the 1840's half the population starved to death, or about 4 million people.....a genocide by the British which Ireland has never recovered from to this day, AND of course India where 30 million people perished when variations of this theory were applied between 1769----1944.
Modern equivalents of this policy would be Bangladesh 1974--5 where Heinz Kissinger blocked food aid to the country, in the hope of toppling the regime there, and 500,000 people subsequently died, AND of course Iraq where the USA again instituted a vicious blockade/sanctions regime against the Saddam regime from 1991--2003, where 1,000,000 people died. These are clearly war crimes by the filthy International Jews.
Gaza would be the latest example.
Starvation and war have already been used as a means of subjugating and controlling enemy nations. Its is a nasty form of waging covert war against another race, without calling it a war.
Many of course have questioned Malthus's theory that overpopulation can lead to famine. Indeed his ideas were contrary to the general prevalent perception of many in the Enlightenment Movement in Europe during his time who felt that through sheer human ingenuity, scientific development and progress could all contribute in solving the problem of expanding populations...........AND to a large extent the "optimists" of Malthus's time have been proven more right than wrong, with certain exceptions around the world.
So in my opinion this "optimist" view of humanity still holds true that fundamentally expanded populations can be managed by rapid development, science and human ingenuity. In addition I think we constantly underestimate the true reserves of what minerals the earth holds. We have only exploited a very small percentage of the earths resources on the vast land masses of Asia, Eurasia, Africa and the America's. We have as yet not even pinched the resources that lie in the sea bed.............or in the future, with vast space freighter ships the resources of the universe....Or the possibility of renewal resources........or the use of substitute resources....or hybrid resources.
Our perceptions of "scarce resources" are too often not based on rationality and facts, but based on prejudice and bias or simple business strategy/opportunity:
1. "I don't want the Third World to enjoy the same living standards as me, they don't deserve it..........they deserve poverty and backwardness, and positive Malthus indoctrination.....war, and famine, to keep them down, and backward...through elaborate arguments of global warming, Climate Change, and environmental degradation....or in the case of Muslim countries Islamic Fundamentalism."........"or Artificially high oil prices which hurt the poor countries the most, instituted by the controlling commodity markets of New York, Rotterdam and London".....or through simple war and political destabilisation.
2. In any commodity/raw material market the controlling businesses to make a good profit must control the supply, AND demand for the good, which often can be sold as a "scarce resource".........it is finite and therefore its price must be kept high. This is true of Diamonds, alcohol in the USA during prohibition and so forth.......JOE public would not buy the products from certain business if it was widely known that such products are limitless and available. Take oil/petroleum...............Russian scientists in the 18th century thought that petroleum was produced by decomposing dinosaur bodies, and other such prehistoric animals. In the 1940's Russian scientists again discovered that petroleum in fact was a natural produced product NOT FROM PREHISTORIC ANIMALS but produced by earth NATURALLY. In short petroleum is an abundant limitless resource which theoretically could be free for all to use, once processing costs have been paid by the respective governments..........But here we are in 2010 paying the commodity market speculators of New York, Rotterdam and London, at $80 a barrel for what is a FREE naturally produced good/resource from Mother Earth. Additionally petroleum is sold as a "scarce resource" "PEAK OIL" that will one day run out, AND that countries like the USA, being the only hyperpower should attempt to grab the nations with this resource as quickly as possible, as a pseudo-strategy to explain America's ceaseless Realpolitik hardball military adventures in the Greater Middle East(NOT).
"Optimists" such as Professor Julian Lincoln Simon (February 12, 1932 – February 8, 1998) who in his book "The Ultimate Resource II" (1996), ISBN 0-691-00381-5, argued that "...increasing wealth and technology make more resources available; although supplies may be limited physically they may be viewed as economically indefinite as old resources are recycled and new alternatives are developed by the market. Simon challenged the notion of a pending Malthusian catastrophe—that an increase in population has negative economic consequences; that population is a drain on natural resources; and that we stand at risk of running out of resources through over-consumption. Simon argues that population is the solution to resource scarcities and environmental problems, since people and markets innovate. His ideas were praised by Nobel Laureate economists Friedrich Hayek[3] and Milton Friedman, the latter in a 1998 foreword to The Ultimate Resource II"
On the other hand I also think there are certain limits to the ingenuity and organisational abilities of many nations so that the idea that ALL nations have the capacity to solve their population growth problems through scientific ingenuity, progress, development DOES not clearly apply, and that Malthus may be more correct in those cases.
Theories such as Malthus's are not dangerous, its after all just an idea, a perspective in a sea of ideas. But when rabid politicians with certain agenda's co opt these theories, skewer, bend and selectify them through their peculiar ideological prisms there after applying them to certain countries to achieve political objectives...then clearly such things become dangerous.
German Philosophers romanticising ancient India is in itself not dangerous, its just a perspective after all. When these same ideas are selectively chosen out of context and applied politically, criminally under a dictatorship then it becomes a different matter all together.
And SO, it is also true with Heinz Kissinger in his policy paper written at the height of his influence and power in Washington, the capital of the most powerful nation on earth ....about instituting certain Malthusian positivist policies to coerce selectively certain countries in the Third World which were deemed to be, BY HIM, future security and strategic threats to the USA.
Kissinger is an interesting character who many in the international community regard as a war criminal, but being an American official he is afforded total immunity from such major crimes, and also as part of the International Jewish community linked to the Bilderberg Group.
By observing and following his ideas, we have a better grasp of the International Jew agendas elaborated through the JEWSA.
It is thus very natural that such an outrageous and criminal idea posted below, and elaborated in an American policy paper should originate from him.
Wikipedia:
"Henry (Heinz) Alfred Kissinger (born May 27, 1923) is a German-born American political scientist, diplomat, and recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. He served as National Security Advisor and later concurrently as Secretary of State in the administrations of Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. After his term, his opinion was still sought out by many following presidents.
A proponent of Realpolitik, Kissinger played a dominant role in United States foreign policy between 1969 and 1977. During this period, he pioneered the policy of détente with the Soviet Union, orchestrated the opening of relations with China, and negotiated the Paris Peace Accords, ending American involvement in the Vietnam War. His role in the bombing of Cambodia and other American interventions abroad during this period remains controversial.
Kissinger is still a controversial figure today. He was honored as the first recipient of the Ewald von Kleist Award of the Munich Conference on Security Policy and currently serves as the chairman of Kissinger Associates, an international consulting firm. Kissinger was the "most frequent visitor" to the George W. Bush White House as an unofficial political adviser on Israel and the Middle East—including the Iraq War."
"The Case against Henry Kissinger"Part I
"The Case against Henry Kissinger" Part II
Third World Traveler: Henry Kissinger page
"Old Henry still going strong after all these years"
__________________________________
Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide
by Joseph Brewda at The WSJ
On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security.
(Supremely ironical isn't it that the USA itself in recent times has been flooded by Third World immigrants, where it is alleged about 10--20 million illegals exist on the margins of society, statusless working for pennies. Further that the USA is unable to secure its frontiers with Mexico through where many immigrants flood into the USA. From the elite perspective this all means cheaper, more mobile ununionized labor, and it also means that the substantial benefits accrued by regular American workers can now be challenged via the availability of an alternative cheap statusless labor pool.
The increasing racial diversification of American society, and the widening gap of the super rich in their high security isolated mansions, and on the other hand the expansion of the American underclass to 40 million or more could pose, a security challenge within America, and the REAL REASON for the institution of the Patriot Act, and the establishment of significant numbers of gulags run by FEMA in the USA presently----intelligent Americans have come to realize that most of the security acts passed since 2001 and 9/11 are purely targeted against them, and used on a daily basis against them also.
This seems to be by design by the elite through the conditioning by the Jewish media and cinema........and by as early as 2040, European Americans will become a minority. This is not a criticism, but a mere observation of actual facts rapidly taking shape. This obviously must have implications for the character of the USA both internally and externally in the arena of foreign policy.
Imagine in the near future President Maria Gomez meeting with the President of Brazil (on the Kissinger list of threatening countries???!!! to the USA):
"Olla Compadre..........whats up".....obviously the official accent in the country must also change to reflect the demographic changes away from the present plummy NE affected accents.
The USA started off with about 3 million people at Independence, and now has about 320 million including illegals, and will have about 460 million by 2050, with at present a very robust foreign policy, two current on-going wars, more possibly on the pipeline, 800 military bases around the world........and Heinz Kissinger escaping from Nazi Germany produces an official paper talking about illusionary threats from mostly weak Third World nations, and how to reduce their population through starvation and war? Prima facie War Crimes charges material)
Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine.
(What are the covert details? Start wars internally as a civil war, or fund insurgency groups within countries or between neighbors? India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia........what has been the actual result since 1975 in these targeted countries?)
Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (the same post Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.
(So we are not talking about just another policy paper, but a major effort covering several departments....AND when was this policy ended, or did it ever end?)
The bogus arguments that Kissinger advanced were not original. One of his major sources was the Royal Commission on Population, which King George VI had created in 1944 “to consider what measures should be taken in the national interest to influence the future trend of population.” The commission found that Britain was gravely threatened by population growth in its colonies, since “a populous country has decided advantages over a sparsely-populated one for industrial production.” The combined effects of increasing population and industrialization in its colonies, it warned, “might be decisive in its effects on the prestige and influence of the West,” especially effecting “military strength and security.”
(Naturally that is why Heinz was made in 1995, an honorary Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire. That Britain since decolonization at an institutional level, more than any other developed country still has that mean streak of obstructing development in the Third World, and especially the countries which she exploited the most through her Empire is no surprise. That Britain uses its agents of influence in the USA, such as Soros, Murdock, Bernard Lewis, Fox News, Hollywood and Kissinger to guide America is also no surprise.
Britain has prospered since losing her empire in the 1950's and 1960's; the economy in real terms has increased by 5 times since 1950. Naturally and clearly many nations can do very well without an empire, as Japan, Germany, and a good deal of European nations have shown post WWII. The trick is let go of the ego of empire, and the psychological conditioning that comes with empire which require subjugating other people for ones perceived benefits........In what way did Britain benefit from killing 30 million South Asians through Malthusian induced famines?)
NSSM 200 similarly concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth in the former colonial sector. It paid special attention to 13 “key countries” in which the United States had a “special political and strategic interest”: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. It claimed that population growth in those states was especially worrisome, since it would quickly increase their relative political, economic, and military strength.
(Interesting which countries are on the list, and which aren't:
1. India: Most of its weapons, 70% is Soviet, and its main strategic industry has been built up by the Soviet Union. It faces a Maoist insurgency, and on one ocassion a British agent (MI-5) was captured whilst flying an illegal plane filled with arms presumed to be for the Indian Maoists. The other main threat is of course Pakistan, an artificial state created by the parting British, which alone has initiated several wars against India in 1948, 65, 71, 1990 almost, 1999, and 2002 almost again. Britain created the notorious ISI in 1948, and was the primary influence in the Pakistani military until the 1960's. Since that time the USA is the primary influence in Pakistan and the Pakistan military. The USA bankrolls the ISI, which means all ISI ops have to be approved by the USA. The so called "Islamist" insurgency in India thus may be characterised as foreign proxy wars against India using failed state Pakistan.
2. Bangladesh: Failed state; huge levels of poverty; poor governance under the influence of the UK/USA. Surplus population immigrating to Assam resulting in riots and fights...and also into other parts of India creating social and economic problems. There are presumed to be about 20 million Bangladeshis in India. Bangladeshis are an intelligent capable people, but unfortunately have not been able to break off the shackles of colonialism.....which are now covertly applied through the post colonial elite and state institutions of the military/bureaucracy....British military advisors are based in Bangladesh.
3. Pakistan: failed state, almost since independence, and dominated by the military which is primarily guided by the UK into the 1960's and since that time the USA. Pakistan is a permanent nuisance to its neighbors.....Afghanistan, Iran, and India. There is a possibility of the country eventually dissolving under the pressure of the USA/Pak military conspiracy against the country.
4. Indonesia: Dominated by the military and the USA since 1965; gross corruption by the elite, and wide scale poverty and under development. Jakarta has developed but the rest of the country exists in dire Third World squalor. Destabilization programs have been instituted using Islamic Fundamentalists more recently, which are mostly controlled by the Indonesian military.
5. Philippines: Verging on the Failed State list. Wide scale political corruption, and still under the USA sphere of influence. Military battling Muslim and Communist separatist groups.
6. Turkey; is doing well economically, and this expresses itself in seeking greater independence from the USA, the traditional country of influence since the 1950's. In the past especially in the 1970's the country did experience major political instability involving left and right wing groups resulting in a military coup in 1980 approved by Washington.
7. Nigeria: dominated by the military and linked to the UK and certain oil corporations. Wide scale poverty for Africa's largest (population wise) country. Frequent ethnic rifts between the Muslim North and Christian South. Competes with South Africa as the most influential black African country. State corruption is endemic so the oil bonus has NOT been effectively utilized to benefit the vast majority of the ordinary people.
8. Egypt: The UK as colonial master established the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1920's to counter the Egyptian nationalist movement in that country. Eventually gaining independence after WWII, the USA installed their military puppet Gamel Abdul Nasser, chosen by one Miles Copeland, and of course later Saddam in Iraq, Through Nasser's assistance. Nasser attempted to destroy the British created Islamic Brotherhood, and instead, presumably with American guidance fostered Arab nationalism as a counter weight to pan- Islamism. Succeeded by Sadat, killed by Islamic Fundamentalists subsequently, and than Hosni Mubarak to the present. The Egyptian state tightly controls the activities of Islamic fundamentals and has been largely successful in managing them. HOWEVER, Egypt is a far from well managed state, containing the largest Arab populated country, with most of the people living in dire poverty and squalor. Most of the country is desert with only 4% of the country containing arable land. America under writes and thus bribes the Mubarak administration into following Israel friendly policies that hurt Palestinians and their very basic needs.......Egypt is yet another poorly managed, corrupt state ruled by Pharohs for life, who then are succeeded by their sons.
9. Ethopia: Only African country not to be colonised, though has been racked by a Marxist government led by a military strongman since the 1970's, and then later civil war, war with neighbors Somalia and Eritria, and currently the regional gofer for the USA, providing troops for the invasion of Somalia to fight and replace American backed Islamists Somalia. Verging on the fail state.....should be on that list, and of course HAS experienced famine which led to the creation of Band Aid in the UK organised by one Bob Geldorf......."Do they know its Christmas?"...."We are the World" in the USA in the mid 1980's.
10. Mexico: Porfirio Diaz, "Poor Mexico, so far away from God and so close to the USA" ..........The USA obviously had played a prominent role in Mexican domestic politics, and one wonders which of the Mexican presidents were/are American puppets. The "Munro Doctrine" from 1823 meant, and included Mexico, and after some initial wars between the two countries the USA has played a negative dominant role in that country. The USA as the largest consumer of illicit drugs which now uses Mexico as the main transit point and source for its huge drugs addiction market, resulting in the creation of a virtual narco-state in Mexico which the weak state is unable to quell and control despite the deployment of huge security forces.
11. Brazil: Things are looking up for Brazil in many senses, and is a member of BRIC. After experiencing unstable American backed military junta's, Brazil is now enjoying stable democratic rule and is predicted to be a major economic power house in the future. However having said this Brazil like many developing countries still faces many problems.
12. Colombia: Similar to Mexico situation wise, fighting Communist guerrilla's with the significant help of American military advisors, and the enormous illegal drugs industry in that country, which often is used by political groups to fuel their movements.
For example, Nigeria: “Already the most populous country on the continent, with an estimated 55 million people in 1970, Nigeria's population by the end of this century is projected to number 135 million. This suggests a growing political and strategic role for Nigeria, at least in Africa.” Or Brazil: “Brazil clearly dominated the continent demographically.” The study warned of a “growing power status for Brazil in Latin America and on the world scene over the next 25 years.”
(Correct in respect to Brazil only)Food as a weapon
There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that “population growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline,” even if such measures were adopted.
(Birth control programs in themselves aren't evil or sinister.......though obviously you'd want to question the motives of Kissinger. In my honest Opinion India, Pakistan, and obviously Bangladesh amongst many nations would benefit greatly from effective well funded birth control programs. Indira Gandhi for India realized the importance of such programs, though the aggressive institution of such a program in India put a lot of people off, and since the time of the Emergency 1975--1977, Congress hasn't seriously touched the subject beyond superficial announcements.......Nobody here is suggesting Indira Gandhi was influenced by Kissinger on this one issue, though the timeline is intriguing!!!)
A second measure was curtailing food supplies to targetted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: “There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID [U.S. Agency for International Development] and consultative groups. Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion.”
“Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now,” the document continued, adding, “Would food be considered an instrument of national power? ... Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can't/won't control their population growth?”
(The USA is not obligated to feed the world, but the world would be a much better place if the USA stopped backing into power unsavory characters who subsequently create problems for those countries and their neighbors, through the actions of their colorful installed puppets.........Saddam, Noreiga, Charles Taylor, .............far too many more)
Kissinger also predicted a return of famines that could make exclusive reliance on birth control programs unnecessary. “Rapid population growth and lagging food production in developing countries, together with the sharp deterioration in the global food situation in 1972 and 1973, have raised serious concerns about the ability of the world to feed itself adequately over the next quarter of century and beyond,” he reported.
The cause of that coming food deficit was not natural, however, but was a result of western financial policy: “Capital investments for irrigation and infrastucture and the organization requirements for continuous improvements in agricultural yields may be beyond the financial and administrative capacity of many LDCs. For some of the areas under heaviest population pressure, there is little or no prospect for foreign exchange earnings to cover constantly increasingly imports of food.”
“It is questionable,” Kissinger gloated, “whether aid donor countries will be prepared to provide the sort of massive food aid called for by the import projections on a long-term continuing basis.” Consequently, “large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades—a kind the world thought had been permanently banished,” was foreseeable—famine, which has indeed come to pass.
________________________________
Further references:
Wikipedia
Alternative source
