Jul 17, 2012

Everybody wants to be the star, and think they will play the main role in Iran's sacred defense.

.
.
.
.
Everybody in Iran's security want to be the star, center of attention, and believe that they will play the main role, and even the only role in Iran's sacred defense. This belief even has a religious quality to it.

These movie stars, and ineffective politicized businessmen appear on Iranian TV, and the news channels telling the people how they will protect the country. This is indeed very strange, since very few nations advertise to the world the strategic secrets of the country. Indeed in no other country do military men appear on national TV as often as the movie stars, and ineffective politicized businessmen as the military men of Iran....especially the commanders of the Pasdaran. 

However the USA's annual unofficial $1500 billion war and security machine will decide which part of Iran's tiny $24 billion annual PPP defense system will play the main role in fighting them, and in defending Iran.

How do we know?

The USA had a secret plan which was leaked in 2001, and again in 2002 by those good Americans/British government officers who did not wish to see their country in constant war for Israel. They recognized and grasped the overall scenario, quite quickly. And so they advertised to the world, before Wikileaks ever arrived about this secret plan.

1. Part one of this plan, was the list of countries to be invaded in the wake of 9/11 2001........Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan.

2. Part two was the manner of the invasion of these countries, which would be the copy of the strategy followed in the attack against CIA Saddam in the Gulf war of 1991, where America was very successful, incurring only 250 servicemen deaths and the loss of 5 tanks and 50 jet planes....against Saddam's military machines 70% destruction, and the loss of 100,000 deaths on the Iraqi side.

3. The same strategy was followed against Afghanistan 2001, and Libya 2011.

4. Israel experimented with the doctrine in 2006, against Lebanon.

For those countries who were at the receiving end of the attacks....CLEARLY what would have played an important role for them is 

(i) Air-defense. 

(ii) Air-force.

Ground forces were used once the Americans were sure that maximum destruction of the enemy had been achieved from the air, and that all air-defense, and air-force assets had been destroyed.

On the other hand, ground forces would not have invaded, if CIA Saddam's Iraq, CIA/ISI Taliban Afghanistan, CIA Gaddafi Libya, and Hezbollah Lebanon had very strong air-defense in the first place.

WE UNDERSTAND FROM OUR INTELLIGENCE SOURCES, LIKE THE ABOVE CIA PUPPETS, THAT FALSE DEFENSE IS BEING PROPAGATED IN IRAN.....IN ORDER TO DEFEAT IRAN QUICKLY AND THAT THE MULLAHS THEMSELVES WERE INSTALLED BY THE CIA AND UK IN 1979. 

THAT THERE ARE AGENTS OF THE CIA, MOSSAD WORKING WITHIN THE MULLAH SECURITY APPARATUS.

THAT THESE AGENTS HAVE CREATED A FALSE IMAGE COVERING AT LEAST 20 YEARS, THROUGH REGULAR TV and MEDIA PROPAGANDA, THAT ALL IRAN HAS TO DO TO DEFEAT THE ENEMY IS FIRE A FEW HUNDRED NORTH KOREAN DESIGNED CONVENTIONAL MISSILES AT ISRAEL, AND THEN BLOCK THE STRAIGHTS OF HORMUZ......IF IT WAS THAT SIMPLE!!!

This strategy which has been advertised for 20 years does not address for one minute,  the USA military strategy and the need to counter the enemy strategy of carpet bombing of Iran on a massive scale....up to 2500 targets within Iran.

Given Iran's small resource allocation for strategic defense, just $24 billion in PPP terms, then Iran must focus only on defensive, air defense warfare, and nothing else.

It does not make sense to say that "We will fire several hundred Korean missiles at you if you attack us, whilst you destroy our nuclear installations"......the proper defensive strategy is to disperse such installation, and build them underground, rather than embark on an expensive SSM program.

It does not make sense for Iran to say, "If you attack us , we will close the straights of Hormuz"

However it does make sense to say, and prepare for comprehensively, "If you attack us, and our country we will shoot down anything that comes within our air-space, and we have the capability to do it"

It is no good firing a few North Korean missiles at Israel, if in the process Iran is destroyed CIA Saddam like in 1991, and 2003.

It is no good blocking the straights of Hormuz, if in the process Iran is destroyed CIA Saddam like in 1991, and 2003.

The Nazi Germans told the people that Germany had "secret weapons" that could destroy the enemy, and thus win a final decisive victory...... against the enemy once and for all, and very quickly....with V1 rockets, and V2 rockets....but in reality they had little impact on the war ultimately, and Germany lost, with destruction of her great cities...............this is what will happen to Tehran, Isfahan, Mashad, Qom, Tabriz, Shiraz, if the country does not develop strong air-defense, and eventually air-force capability.