The economy is booming just after 1 month, and Trump promises to lead GDP growth by 4 % in the near future.
The small businessman, the medium sized businessman in the USA have high confidence in him, and so they are now leading the economic charge to make America ECONOMICALLY GREAT again. But for the big MNC's its a different matter....having tasted the allure and profits of 'offshoring' with USA taxpayer money and subsidy they will not show less reluctance for off-shoring any time soon, short of Trump DRASTICALLY changing the whole economic trade relationship regime set up by Reaganomics and Clintonomics from the 1980--1990's by these two former Globalist regimes.....lead in the shadows by the Rothschilds of London and their reps in the USA, the Rockeffars, cryto-Jews originating from France/Spain....owing their wealth in the 19th to the Rothschilds of London, the unofficial monarchy of the Jew.
The job numbers are very good.
The national debt of $20 trillion is on the way down, finally.
For all these good indicators are meaningless so long as the USA economy remains a hostage of the Rothschilds of London. The Federal reserve will have to be dismantled before it collapses the economy as it did in 1929, and 2008....deliberately for the purpose of USA powerplay and control. A collapsed economy by the Federal Reserve and Wall Street will lead to martial law, Trumps base turning on him and massive capital flight in magnitude far greater than 1980--2017(due to the process of off-shoring and neo-liberalism with flexible capital flight around the world.....Chile, Argentina, Russia, India).
The fundamental operations of the Federal Reserve is flawed, and must be flawed when it was set up on Jekyll Island in 1913, and this process must lead to economic collapse.......putting a nice Yenta face on this fact does not change the reality of this final outcome.
To foretsall this Trump has to first 'take-over' the Federal Reserve, and then dismantle it .....a bit like Betsy Davos as Education Secretary, and Rick Perry at energy.
So yes things are looking up.
We even have staunch Hillary Clinton supporters from the 'Deep State' admitting that there is no evidence against the administration of dastardly Russian collusion that goes against the laws set by the 'Aliens and Sedition Act' (1798)
.....it WAS after ALL just CIA led smoke and mirrors on behalf of Obummer and Killary Yessa massa sir.....as good obedient house niggers.
On the other hand wiretapping of Trump is a FACT that is fast emerging hot and fast, unlike a CIA funded JFK movie 30 years later, to give the topic a new blind alley spin.
Some CIA bloggers are even going as far as to say that 'We are all wiretapped' by the big bad Deep State.....so suck it up and get used to it. Yes I am wiretapped even when I am shitting......but I am not the President of the USA.
The President of the USA is constitutionally and legally a different person to John Doe who is also illegally being wiretapped by the Deep State.
It is not a subject of meriment either, and smirking by foreign leaders.
Wiretapping the president as a presage to a COUP is not constitutional to say the least.
Wiretapping the future President to tip the balance of elections against him in favour of crooked Hitlary, is not constitutional.
Wiretapping the President, using a foreign power (The country from which the USA won INDEPENDENCE from, after 8 years fo struggle and sacrifice.....) to spy on your own future and prospective President is definitely not constutional and goes against the fundamentals of the Aliens and Sedition Act (1798).
Manufacturing a fake dossier in an aforementioned country, to launder in the USA, using a foreign intelligence company's private contractor and Senator MacCain is unconstitutional.
Trump will have to deal with this seriously and mercilessly.
There is a very nice RFK stadium in DC. The Kennedy that was assassinated by a CIA brainwashed Christian Arab assassin, to prevent yet another Kennedy becoming President and thus avoid the final pay day.
Clinton Ally Says Smoke, But No Fire: No Russia-Trump Collusion
bY Ken Dilanian at NBC NEWS and Information Clearing House.
Former Acting CIA Director Michael Morell, who endorsed Hillary Clinton and called Donald Trump a dupe of Russia, cast doubt Wednesday night on allegations that members of the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.
Morell, who was in line to become CIA director if Clinton won, said he had seen no evidence that Trump associates cooperated with Russians. He also raised questions about the dossier written by a former British intelligence officer, which alleged a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.
His comments were in sharp contrast to those of many Clinton partisans — such as former communications director Jennifer Palmieri — who have stated publicly they believe the Trump campaign cooperated with Russia's efforts to interfere in the election against Clinton.
Morell said he had learned that the former officer, Christopher Steele, paid his key Russian sources, and interviewed them through intermediaries.
"On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire, at all," Morell said at an event sponsored by the Cipher Brief, an intelligence web site.
"There's no little campfire, there's no little candle, there's no spark. And there's a lot of people looking for it."
Ansolutely no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia!
Morell pointed out that former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said on Meet the Press on March 5 that he had seen no evidence of a conspiracy when he left office January 20.
"That's a pretty strong statement by General Clapper," Morell said.
About the dossier, Morell said, "Unless you know the sources, and unless you know how a particular source acquired a particular piece of information, you can't judge the information — you just can't."
The dossier "doesn't take you anywhere, I don't think," he said.
He continued: "I had two questions when I first read it. One was, How did Chris talk to these sources? I have subsequently learned that he used intermediaries.
"And then I asked myself, why did these guys provide this information, what was their motivation? And I subsequently learned that he paid them. That the intermediaries paid the sources and the intermediaries got the money from Chris. And that kind of worries me a little bit because if you're paying somebody, particularly former FSB officers, they are going to tell you truth and innuendo and rumor, and they're going to call you up and say, 'hey, let's have another meeting, I have more information for you,' because they want to get paid some more.
"I think you've got to take all that into consideration when you consider the dossier."