American Jews do not support the Israeli lobby on everything....they have their own nuanced perspectives.

There is always hope in the world.

Maybe in the future the majority of Jews and the 52 Jewish political lobby groups in the USA will change their perspectives on a number of issues:

(i) Wisdom of leading the covert charge, with the aid of Israel and the FBI to convert the USA into a Bolshevik Police State since Bill Clinton, run by Jews and trained by the Stasi(Marcus Wulf--Jew, retired and died in Israel) and the former KGB (Yevgeny Primakov---Jew, former head of KGB)....and Jew organized false flags in the USA 1993 WTC, Oklahoma 1995 and 2001 9/11. These were clearly Jew organized events. Whilst some elite Jews may think a totalitarian state is good for the tribe (Shorter leash on the USA), especially if the economy crashes 2015/6.....and there are riots, and instability, ultimately a totalitarian State is doomed to fail, and will harm many if not most Jews in the USA....who do not escape from the USA to Israel.

(ii) The Jew wisdom of trying to control the Presidency. On the Republican side crypto-Jewish Jeb Bush with his infamous crime family, and Donald Trump whose entire family is married to Jews......ALL supported by Jewish mafia casino money. On the Democratic side fagot Bernie Sanders is a Jew who is out doing Obama's CHANGE mantra with his LOVE for the American middle and working class..yeah! Why can't European non-Jews who made America what it is today, run the country? Nobody seriously thinks Jewish fiat currency, and speculation made the country great......or Jewish porn.....or Jewish TV and entertainment.

(iii) Why do the Jews try to run Capital Hill? Everything from there has to be Israeli centric?

(iv|) Why do Jews run the Federal Reserve?

(v) Why does the Jews dominated USA wage war against so many poor nations, based on false excuses.

How will the truly big questions on earth and the universe be solved by such narrow minded malice?

The largely JEWISH neo-con artists are the true enemies of the USA:

1. Their children do not serve in the armed forces of the USA or Israel.

2. They have never served in the armed forces of the above two states.

3. They derive the bulk of their income from the whole process of war making....from Think Tank Conceptualization to actual war. 


American Jews Reject the Israel Lobby—and Support the Iran Deal

The war coalition of billionaires, fundamentalists, and Netanyahu cronies doesn't speak for Jewish opinion.

By Jon Basil Utley at the American conservative and antiwar.com

The Israel Lobby does not represent most Jews. Sound surprising? You’d never know it from most TV talk shows or Republicans denouncing the Iran agreement as a terminal threat to Israel, and least of all from “The Lobby” itself. Its intimidating power depends upon the myth that it represents all American Jews, when it does not even represent a majority. It should really be called the “Likud Lobby,” representing Netanyahu, neoconservatives, militant settlers on the West Bank, evangelicals (mainly old ones) impatient for Armageddon, and the military-industrial complex.

Most American Jews are divided or just don’t care, just like other Americans. The young, especially, do not support the policies of Israeli or American hawks seeking more wars in the Middle East. Many Jewish voices are in accord on the pact.
By a 20-point margin in various polls, American Jews support the Iran agreement. The largest circulation Jewish newspapers carry balanced analyses and discussions. The Jewish Week’s publisher, Gary Rosenblatt, reports interesting and typical polling on Jewish Americans in an article, “Iran Deal Driving Jews Further Apart“:
  • 90 percent are proud to be Jewish
  • 43 percent say that caring about Israel is essential to their Jewishness
  • 65 percent feel “that U.S. support for Israel is either about right or, for 20 percent, too much.”
An earlier Pew poll showed:
  • 31 percent did not feel attached to the state of Israel
  • 39 percent felt only “somewhat” attached
  • 83 percent believe that the settlements on Palestine lands are inimical to Israeli security.
The largest Jewish newspaper, Forward, has published articles like “Fact Checking the Flame Throwers on Both Sides of Iran Deal” and “Why Israel Lobby is Biggest Casualty of Feud over Netanyahu’s Speech.”
J Street, named for the missing street in Washington, was founded to promote the missing voice of non-AIPAC Jews. It is manning phone banks, placing op-eds, and running ads in support of the Iran agreement. The old-line American Council for Judaism has long promoted peace with profound, learned writings since the founding of Zionism. Tikkun is another large organization supporting the agreement.
The New Yorker reports on AIPAC’s declining influence. Last March I wrote “The Crumbling Israeli Lobby” with statistics about its declining support, particularly among younger Jews and Evangelical Christians “rebelling against the excessive biblical literalism of their parents.” The Washington Post published “Jewish Leaders Don’t Speak for American Jews on Iran,” which analyzed the “rift between American Jews and the groups generally known as ‘the Jewish leadership.’” The article follows the money, explaining how a minority of the old and rich calls the tune.
All this support for the Iran deal from Jews of all ages (see J Street’s statistics) has not outweighed the literally billions of dollars which some older Jews are willing to throw into the fight. Congress may yet override Obama and reject the agreement. The Washington Post’s Walter Pincus wrote “The GOP’s Alternate Universe On Iran,” explaining that the options remaining after rejection of the deal are leaving Iran to proceed with producing nuclear bombs or starting another war. Although many Republican leaders prefer war, the potential disaster to the world’s economy from the risk of destruction of Persian Gulf oil exports is still to be considered.
The main issues also involve a lot of false information and unproven accusations about Iran. The biggest is that they are religious crazies who would commit suicide if they had just one bomb to drop on Israel. Actually, Iran’s policies have been very cautious. Another is rebutted by Phil Giraldi’s “Did Iranian Weapons Kill Americans,” concerning their supposedly helping Iraq with shaped charges to repel American forces. Another story is that Iran is the largest sponsor of state terrorism because it supports the Hezbollah guerrillas. And so on. They are all familiar to those of us who wrote about and exposed lies about Iraq before Washington destroyed that country.
Republican claims that they are just demanding a better deal are not believable, as other nations won’t go along. The agreement is about disarming Iran’s nuclear potential (that was the basis for multi-national support) not forcing it to surrender itself. The Europeans, Russia, and China never agreed to demand such a surrender.
Most Americans, Israelis, and Iranians want peace, but powerful forces profit from wars. We have an earlier tragic example to learn from, the undermining of the Oslo peace accords, which actually contained compromises and started settling the Palestinian issue. Netanyahu and a handful of neoconservatives put out their own plan, “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” This agenda included the destruction of Iraq, and one of the signatories, David Wurmser, explained how Iraq could be thrown into chaos.
Former National Security Council director Brent Scowcroft compares the Iran agreement to earlier diplomatic breakthroughs opening up China and agreeing to armaments control with Russia, “an epochal moment that should not be squandered.” Most American Jews agree.