.
.
.
It would help matters of course if the USA and their doggy allies stopped arming, training, financing 'al-CIA-duh'.
Then the threat of 'the mad dogs of war' liberating Syrian WMD's would cease.
What we would be left with then in Syria would be a Socialist, Secular, Moderate regime that has been thoroughly unremarkable in all respects since the dynasty came to power in 1970.....with a PPP per Capita Income of $5000, despite moderate oil exports.
But in all other aspects thoroughly PREDICTABLE regime which wishes to coexist in peace with all its neighbors by maintaining the present status quo of delicate power balance, AND a Shia minority ruling the majority Sunnis.
Bit like the 7-10 million Jews who rule the USA.
What is PREDICTABLE with high certainty is that Syrian government WMD's will not be used against Israel, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, Turkey and Russia. Despite false propaganda the Assad regime has not used WMD's against its own people.......as it understands as a minority elite government that winning the people over to the government cause is as important as fighting "al-CIA-duh".
What is PREDICTABLE with high certainty is that if 'al-CIA-duh' liberates Syrian WMD's, there is a high probability that they will subsequently be used by 'al-CIA-duh' against Israel, Jordan, Iraq, Turkey, Iran and Russia. The Western states do not have the ground forces to secure ALL Syrian WMD's. Most significantly, 'al-CIA-duh' has already used WMD's against Syrian troops and civilians.
We have seen what has happened with Libya, a country which after being courted was persuaded to destroy all its WMD's, after 2003. But all other Libyan arms have flooded the Middle East and African arms bazaars, without any regulation.
BUT if faggots in Security and the State Department can't handle stability, peace, AND in a troubled disordered world where there needs to be a lead/need for systemic cooperation between nations, not confrontation, then that is a different matter.
_________________________________________
US Willing to Keep Assad to Avoid Regional War
Russia: Rebels Don't Seem on Board With Talks
by Jason Ditz, at antiwar.com
Though the “official” US position on Syria seems to change wildly by the hour and is based primarily on who is talking and who is standing near them at the time, new reports suggest the Obama Administration is ready to ditch their demands for regime change.
As violence skyrockets in neighboring Iraq, and nations like Lebanon and Turkey also see destabilizing incidents along their borders, the concern of Syria’s civil war turning regional is growing, and the administration, or at least much of it, now believes that keeping Assad in place is a small price to pay to avoid that eventuality.
Which of course rests on the same premise as the US demanding regime change: the administration’s inescapable assumption that they, and not the Syrians, ought to decide who wins and loses this war. Even the past international talks have centered more on the US and Russia, with Syria’s government and rebels mostly sidelined.
The reality though is that the rebels are not on board with the idea of peace in the first place, a fact which some US officials are loathe to admit but which is drawing growing Russian concerns that the talks won’t have a serious, influential rebel component.
US government position is, as always a nebulous work-in-progress, with Secretary of State John Kerry still loudly pledging virtually unconditional support for the rebels even as the indications are that much of the rest of the cabinet is getting really concerned by the rebels reliance on Jabhat al-Nusra, the al-Qaeda faction in the fight, and the lack of secular leaders of any note.
______________________
John Kerry is a Jew of Bohemian descent, allied to the extreme right-wing Likud Party of Israel, though he postures as a liberal in the USA. Kerry's own brother made Aliyah to Israel, and affirmed the family's original faith......so no surprise on that score.
On the other hand, Kerry was the ex-military hero who became a beacon of the anti-Vietnam war movement in the 1970's..wikipedia:"and during 1968–1969 served an abbreviated four-month tour of duty in South Vietnam as officer-in-charge (OIC) of a Swift Boat. For that service, he was awarded combat medals that include the Silver Star, Bronze Star, and three Purple Hearts. Securing an early return to the United States, Kerry joined the Vietnam Veterans Against the War in which he served as a nationally recognized spokesman and as an outspoken opponent of the Vietnam War. He appeared before the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs where he deemed United States war policy in Vietnam to be the cause of "war crimes."....
killing 4 million people in SE Asia is a war-crime, but using proxy forces funded by the USA which may have killed 94,000 already is not?......if the war drags on and 500,000 are killed eventually, will that make it a war crime? Whose war crime?;
Kerry doggedly pursued and attended Congressional hearings about CIA cocaine imports into the USA in the 1980's The would be president who lost an election in 2004 because of the devious actions of the Bush clan......AND for a long time, deceptively Kerry projected himself as a friend of Bashar Assad.......The Assads/Kerrys; two thoroughly cosmopolitan families from other sides of the earth that could be friendly and work together.....BUT no.
Four decades of great public service wasted for the sake of an obscurantist, minority extremist government in Israel, at the very end of his political career.
When the tribal call comes through Mossad or whoever, they revert to type, become glazed eyed and start marching in Israel's direction. This is the problem which enabled The American Civil War, WWI and especially WWII which killed so many Jews........the inability of Jews to disobey their Banker masters and their little dangerous experiment called Israel.
100% of the GREATEST, RICHEST Jewish bankers don't live in Israel........ever wondered why Kerry?
