.
.
.
India must continue adding to its meager mountain divisions....I have suggested 30 from the present 10. India had 10 mountain divisions in the 1970's and 10 is essentially what India still has NOW after 40 years, even though there has been been SIGNIFICANT developments by China in the LAC and Tibet......AND in China itself, as the greatest industrial power in the world, and within one or two years greatest economic power.
More 155mm artillery pieces...5000 more.
More 120 mm Morter pieces....10,000 more.
More AA guns....15,000 more.
More Helicopters both transport and attack 1,0000 more
More transport planes 600 more.
More INFRASTRUCTURE directly to the LAC.....Right up to the border, Berlin Wall style.
More storage depots up the mountains/food/ammo/spares/ medicine.
More reinforced concrete bunkers.
More field hospitals up the mountain.
More leisure amenities for soldiers up the mountains---TV, pool tables, squash courts, stadiums, cinemas etc.
NEVER neglect national defense....and if the politicians come short again on national defense as they did with the mistakes of Nehru and Menon (these two lost the war, even after 12 years of Chinese incursions)....This time there will be riots, and a possible coup against the corrupt politicians.
At a minimum bye bye Annie Besants 19th century SOCIALIST Congress Party.......lynch mobs will be out for the CPI in addition. All this is unnecessary.
I write this as a non-Indian citizen, who has never visited India, and is not a Hindu (granted that you don't have to be a Hindu to be an Indian)....I have NOT associated with any Indian organization political or social. Finally at a personal level I do not know any Indians.
But I'm going to take a wild guess...you can do that in Blogs.
(50 Chinese soldiers, 5 tents, 19 km into Indian territory, with dogs-----this is a British game the number 5. Its Totally FALSE. Not true. Up until 2009 I was a very square, clean living spiritual individual, until the tropical heat of SE Asia, and extreme psy-ops/pressure by the CIA and their dogs altered by FUNDAMENTAL NATURE BY 1%.....BUT I am in the process of reverting back to my pre -2009 state. Presumably the Chinese have been following the scandals of the UK on the other hand?)
Mischievous elements in the West connected to the Chinese leadership in Beijing.....maybe Jews, maybe the British, maybe the CIA have stated to the Chinese that I am some kind of extra planetary champion for India.......and the Chinese should fear me. That I may be hostile to China, which of course is not true. This hostility I have experienced in some parts of SE Asia, especially Malaysia where many Chinese exist........total strangers who I have never met before posturing aggressively for a fight!!!!(1.5 liter bottle).
This "Champion of India" meme is further expressed cryptically in a hostile manner by the bizarre representation of cows being driven in front of me which is a strange way of saying that 'though you are the champion for India, with power...we can control you like a wild worthless beast'---for those of you who do not know the cow is a sacred animal in India (patently stupid and contradictory thought patterns)...this again has been displayed in SE Asia.
Another popular anti-Indian psy-ops by the CIA/British? directed against me is the use of cement trucks and heavy duty trucks racing past with noise as I travel outside.....in SE Asia. Translation: There is development here, but no development in your beloved India.
This is strange Jew type paranoia. I'm not the champion of any particular country. BUT I do come from South Asia originally, and I do write about South Asia as well as the UK, naturally.
BUT I certainly have no plans to visit India, not even for a short holiday. The Indian State is corrupt, and pro-USA/Israel. Its security apparatus has connections to those countries, and is infiltrated by right wing extremists from the RSS. Most terrorism in India beyond the Kashmir and the NE is carried out by RSS connected to Indians within the state institutions. I have not had good experiences with Indians in SE Asia, and when I see them I try and avoid them, including eye contact........and avoid talking to them.
Chinese leaders must not make miscalculations based on the gossip of their Jewish, CIA, or British friends....for if they do so....they end up acting like stupid worthless COWS/WATER BUFFALO. Chinese leaders must refute the claim by a Jewish gentleman who stated that Chinese people are easier to control, and persuade if one is tall, blue eyed, and blond.
(I am aware that the Chinese foreign ministry try to recruit the tallest and most attractive candidates to the Chinese FO, regardless of education qualifications)
I'm not a champion of any country, and I certainly am no champion. I'm middle aged, fat, doing a very simple job, that's it.
I welcome Chinese government officers to make contact with me, without the guidance of the CIA, British or the Jews. I have great respect for China. I have great hopes for China.
_________________________________________
India still clueless about trigger behind Chinese incursion
NEW
DELHI: A day ahead of Chinese Premier Li Keqiang's visit to India,
puzzlement prevails on what spurred Chinese intrusion in eastern Ladakh
although its after effects increasingly indicate that Beijing has
emerged a significant gainer.
Going by Li's comments prior to leaving for Delhi the visit is likely to pass off amid reasonable bonhomie with the Chinese insisting that there are robust mechanisms to ensure military standoffs end in stand downs.
But foreign minister Salman Khurshid's candid comment in Beijing after meeting his Chinese counterpart on May 9 that there is no clarity on the April 15th incursion remains the sum total of official wisdom on the event.
Drawing comfort from the Chinese removing their tents, the Manmohan Singh government has been quick to claim that "status quo ante" has been restored.
The government was rigid in its view that the Chinese army must vacate and pull back, but some things have changed on the ground in eastern Ladakh and it will take a while to figure out if the new posture is permanent.
The two sides seem to have arrived at an agreement, perhaps unspoken, that neither will patrol that particular part of Depsang Valley as long as both keep out.
This means Indian forces will not seek to mark a presence — as they have been doing in recent years — in an area they see as India's side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) well within its claim lines.
As they attempt to solve the Chinese riddle, Indian agencies find it hard to reconcile recent initiatives like a dialogue on Afghanistan, the desire to make India Li's first port of call and Beijing's preoccupations in the east with the sudden stab into Ladakh.
There is skepticism whether the manoeuvrings was a local miscalculation or a larger initiative gone wrong. China's tightly- controlled military hierarchy and the supremacy of the political wing makes this hard to accept.
In weighing options to end the showdown, India was careful to avoid an armed escalation although the Army expressed a quiet confidence while not underestimating the odds.
The episode has certainly jolted the political leadership as it brought home the perils of viewing India's giant neighbour through a conventional prism. Some experts see the Ladakh happenings as an example of Chinese "offensive deterrence" - a slap on the wrist to get a pesky neighbour to fall in line.
Beijing is sure to resent any attempt to seek equivalence on the Tibet or Arunachal borders but the incident will only convince skeptics to seek clearer terms on the ongoing border talks before the LAC is altered bit by bit to India's disadvantage.
Going by Li's comments prior to leaving for Delhi the visit is likely to pass off amid reasonable bonhomie with the Chinese insisting that there are robust mechanisms to ensure military standoffs end in stand downs.
But foreign minister Salman Khurshid's candid comment in Beijing after meeting his Chinese counterpart on May 9 that there is no clarity on the April 15th incursion remains the sum total of official wisdom on the event.
Drawing comfort from the Chinese removing their tents, the Manmohan Singh government has been quick to claim that "status quo ante" has been restored.
The government was rigid in its view that the Chinese army must vacate and pull back, but some things have changed on the ground in eastern Ladakh and it will take a while to figure out if the new posture is permanent.
The two sides seem to have arrived at an agreement, perhaps unspoken, that neither will patrol that particular part of Depsang Valley as long as both keep out.
This means Indian forces will not seek to mark a presence — as they have been doing in recent years — in an area they see as India's side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) well within its claim lines.
As they attempt to solve the Chinese riddle, Indian agencies find it hard to reconcile recent initiatives like a dialogue on Afghanistan, the desire to make India Li's first port of call and Beijing's preoccupations in the east with the sudden stab into Ladakh.
There is skepticism whether the manoeuvrings was a local miscalculation or a larger initiative gone wrong. China's tightly- controlled military hierarchy and the supremacy of the political wing makes this hard to accept.
In weighing options to end the showdown, India was careful to avoid an armed escalation although the Army expressed a quiet confidence while not underestimating the odds.
The episode has certainly jolted the political leadership as it brought home the perils of viewing India's giant neighbour through a conventional prism. Some experts see the Ladakh happenings as an example of Chinese "offensive deterrence" - a slap on the wrist to get a pesky neighbour to fall in line.
Beijing is sure to resent any attempt to seek equivalence on the Tibet or Arunachal borders but the incident will only convince skeptics to seek clearer terms on the ongoing border talks before the LAC is altered bit by bit to India's disadvantage.
