.
.
.
.
Chilling in a Berlin Cafe, talking post Mullah democracy
Hassan Yusefi Eshkevari – Reformist cleric and former MP, Eshkevari was arrested in 2000 after taking part in a conference about human rights in Berlin, along with other participants in the event. He was tried at the Special Court for Clerics in Tehran and subsequently disrobed before going to jail for five years after his death sentence was commuted under international pressure. Eshkevari lives in Germany.
Seyed Abdolreza Hejazi - He was one of the most renowned preachers in Tehran in the 1970s. At the time of the revolution he was a close aide of dissident cleric Ayatollah Kazem Shariatmadari. Shortly after the revolution he was accused of being an accomplice in a coup plot against the Islamic Republic. Hejazi was disrobed and executed in 1983. Ironically, the Shah's secret police believed he was a revolutionary who supported Khomeini.
Mohammad Reza Nekounam - A seminary teacher, Nekounam was first arrested in 2014 for insulting high-ranking hardline cleric Nasser Makarem Shirazi. In 2016 he was jailed again for writing an article in a newspaper. In 2017, the Special Clerical Court disrobed him before sentencing him to lashes and five years in jail.
Majid Jafari Tabar – was sentenced to death in 2014 for "financial corruption, having devoted followers, and claiming to be in contact with the hidden Imam." After his conviction, his pictures were published showing him next to Khamenei's son and President Hassan Rouhani.
Seyed Hossein Kazemeini Boroujerdi – He is a cleric who has openly opposed the intervention of religion in politics, and the rule of jurisconsult (Velayat-e Faqih), in other words, the rule of Supreme Leader, currently Khamenei. A court in September 2007 tried him for "fighting God" and "propagating against the regime," and sentenced him to 10 years jail after disrobing him.
Hadi Qabel – A reformist cleric, Qabel was arrested in 2007 on charges of "propagating against the regime." According to his lawyer, the Special Clerical Court disrobed him and sentenced him to 40 months in prison, and a 500,000 tuman fine. He was disrobed on charges of "undermining clerics' prestige." Qabel was pardoned in 2009 after serving 22 months in jail.
Hadi Qabel – A reformist cleric, Qabel was arrested in 2007 on charges of "propagating against the regime." According to his lawyer, the Special Clerical Court disrobed him and sentenced him to 40 months in prison, and a 500,000 tuman fine. He was disrobed on charges of "undermining clerics' prestige." Qabel was pardoned in 2009 after serving 22 months in jail.
Ali Akbar Hekamizadeh – He was the author of the book "Millennial Secrets", a discourse against religious superstition. In the book he asked questions that were later answered by Ayatollah Khmoeini in his book "The Islamic Government." After the Islamic revolution, Islamic Republic authorities disrobed him under pressure from fanatical clerics. He died in 1987.
Ali Afsahi – A young cleric and the editor of a publication about cinema and sports, Afsahi was disrobed forever and jailed for four months on charges of "insulting saints and clerics" following a speech at the Bushehr Film Center in the year 2000.
Seyed Mohammad Mousa Mirshahvalad – A clerical student in Mashad, Mirshahvalad was sentenced to 20 months in jail, 30 lashes and being disrobed for two years for "insulting state officials and propagating against the state." He was pardoned in 2003.
Ayatollah Mussa Shabairi-Zanjani: A "quietist" cleric who has faced state pressure for maintaining independence from the political establishment.
Ali Afsahi – A young cleric and the editor of a publication about cinema and sports, Afsahi was disrobed forever and jailed for four months on charges of "insulting saints and clerics" following a speech at the Bushehr Film Center in the year 2000.
Seyed Mohammad Mousa Mirshahvalad – A clerical student in Mashad, Mirshahvalad was sentenced to 20 months in jail, 30 lashes and being disrobed for two years for "insulting state officials and propagating against the state." He was pardoned in 2003.
Ayatollah Mussa Shabairi-Zanjani: A "quietist" cleric who has faced state pressure for maintaining independence from the political establishment.
Ayatollah Yasubedin Rastegar Jooybari: Known for questioning the legitimacy of the Supreme Leader’s religious credentials, leading to repeated arrests.
Mohammad Shirazi
Hassan Tabatabai-Qomi have historically declined to recognize Khamenei as a marja (a high-level religious authority to be emulated).
Good mullahs must be used to lead the protests in the streets.
Revolutionary Regime Change Through Anti-Regime Clerics: A Theological and Strategic Thesis for Iran's Liberation
Executive Summary: The Clerical Key to Overthrowing the Islamic Republic
The Islamic Republic of Iran faces an existential contradiction: a regime that claims divine legitimacy is systematically rejected by the very religious scholars whose authority it purports to represent.
While the regime imprisons, marginalizes, and murders dissenting clerics, their theological critiques expose the fundamental illegitimacy of absolute velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist).
This thesis argues that dissident mullahs possess unique revolutionary potential to galvanize regime change by weaponizing religious legitimacy against a system that has corrupted both Islam and Iran.
The current uprising (2025-2026) reveals unprecedented anti-clerical sentiment—seminaries invaded, mullahs assaulted, Khomeini's ancestral home burned. Yet this very crisis creates strategic opportunity: reformist clerics can reclaim Islam from the regime's monopoly, channeling popular fury toward ideological regime change rather than wholesale rejection of Shia tradition. By articulating Islamic arguments for democracy, human rights, and popular sovereignty, dissident clerics can provide the theological framework for legitimate transition while mobilizing constituencies unreachable by secular opposition.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
Part I: Theocratic and Ideological Critiques of the Current Regime
The Fundamental Heresy: Absolute Velayat-e Faqih as Innovation in Shia Doctrine
Historical Deviation from Quietist Tradition
For 14 centuries, Shia Islam was dominated by quietist clerics who advocated indirect involvement in politics or no involvement at all. This was not passivity but theological principle: in the absence of the Twelfth Imam (who went into occultation in 941 CE), clerics should focus on religious guidance, supervise government from a distance, and await the Mahdi's return to establish perfect governance.[8]
The quietist tradition created a decentralized, pluralistic clerical structure where believers chose which marja (source of emulation) to follow based on scholarship, piety, and wisdom. Multiple grand ayatollahs coexisted, competing peacefully for followers through superior jurisprudence rather than state coercion. This poly-cephalic system prevented any single cleric from monopolizing religious authority.[9]
Khomeini's innovation fundamentally broke this 14-century tradition. His theory of velayat-e faqih—particularly in its absolute form (velayat-e motlaqaye faqih)—grants the Supreme Leader near-divine authority that can "suspend essential rites of Islam" and demands obedience "as incumbent as performance of prayer". This represents what traditional quietist clerics view as "heretical innovation" (bid'ah) in Shia doctrine.[10][8]
Montazeri's Devastating Religious Critique
Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri (1922-2009) embodies the tragic arc of the revolution. As the original architect of velayat-e faqih and Khomeini's designated successor, his eventual repudiation of the system carries unparalleled weight. Montazeri possessed what Khamenei lacks: supreme religious credentials as a Grand Ayatollah and marja. When he turned against absolute guardianship, he wielded religious authority that could "undermine Khamenei's legitimacy more than anyone else on the planet".[11][12][10][1]
Montazeri's theological critique centered on incompatibility with Islamic principles of justice and consultation (shura):
1. Democratic constraints required: The Supreme Leader should be subject to popular election, term limits, and genuine accountability—making him a "religious-ideological guardian" rather than absolute ruler[13][10][11]
2. Accountability to people: The faqih must answer to representatives of the people, not rule by divine appointment beyond scrutiny[14][13]
3. Human rights as Islamic imperative: Defending rights of minorities (including Baha'is), arguing they are "citizens of this country...must benefit from Islamic compassion which is stressed in Quran"[5]
4. Rejection of political monopoly: The clergy's concentration of power betrays the revolution's promise and corrupts religious authority[1]
The regime's response revealed its theological bankruptcy: Montazeri was placed under house arrest and "mentally ruined in prison". When he died in 2009, state news agencies refused to use his title "Ayatollah"—a petty denial that only highlighted their inability to refute his religious arguments. His critiques "from a religious standpoint" were "particularly damaging" because "the regime seeks to assert that its lack of democracy is irrelevant because it is Islamic. He insists it is not an Islamic government".[15][5][1]
Kadivar's Systematic Demolition of Theological Legitimacy
Reformist cleric and scholar Mohsen Kadivar has provided the most systematic theological deconstruction of absolute velayat-e faqih, demonstrating four fundamental contradictions with both democracy and Islamic principles:[14]
1. Guardianship (Wilayat) Violates Equality
· Velayat-e faqih assumes the general public lacks capacity for pious decision-making equal to jurists
· Contradicts Quranic emphasis on human dignity and equal standing before God
· In democracy, everyone has equal rights and equal capacity to influence public domain
· Islamic tradition of shura (consultation) implies recognition of people's judgment[16][14]
2. Absolutism (Itlaq) Violates Rule of Law
· All democratic officials have limited, checked powers
· Absolute velayat-e faqih grants unchecked, unlimited power to one individual
· The Supreme Leader stands above the law, can repeal the Constitution
· Islamic jurisprudence traditionally emphasized limits even on prophets and imams[14]
3. Appointment Violates Popular Sovereignty
· Velayat-e faqih presents leadership as divine appointment, not popular choice
· Contradicts Islamic tradition where even the first Caliphs required bay'ah (pledge of allegiance) from community
· Historical Shia practice: even designation of successor required community acceptance[17][14]
4. Leader Above Law Violates Justice ('Adl)
· In democracy, no one stands above law—not even highest official
· Velayat-e faqih makes leader the source of law, capable of overriding any statute
· Islamic principle of justice requires rulers to be bound by same laws as ruled[18][14]
Kadivar concludes bluntly: "The wilayat al-faqih, being an autocratic rule of God based on the divine rights of the jurists, is incompatible with democracy" and represents "religious dictatorship". Even proponents of the theory who call it democratic are "clearly wrong...either due to lack of understanding democracy, or for future deniability".[14]
The Theological Case for Popular Sovereignty in Islam
Dissident clerics have developed sophisticated Islamic arguments for democracy and human rights that directly challenge the regime's monopoly on religious interpretation.
The Principle of Shura (Consultation)
Traditional Islamic political thought emphasizes shura—consultation with community representatives—as mandatory, not optional. The Quran explicitly commands: "And those who have responded to their lord and established prayer and whose affair is [determined by] consultation among themselves" (42:38).[19][16]
Reformist clerics argue that shura in modern context requires:
· Representative institutions (parliament) where people's delegates make decisions
· Majority rule in matters not explicitly determined by clear religious text
· Accountability mechanisms where leaders answer to elected representatives
· Separation of powers to prevent tyrannical concentration[16]
The Constitutional Revolution of 1906 saw clerics like Allameh Naeini reconcile parliamentary democracy with Shia jurisprudence by grounding parliament in the principle of shura. This demonstrates historical precedent for clerical support of democratic institutions.[16]
Justice ('Adl) as Primary Principle
Abdolkarim Soroush and other reformist thinkers argue that justice precedes and judges religious interpretation, not the reverse. "We do not draw justice from religion, but accept religion because it is just". This revolutionary formulation means:[18]
· Human rights are not granted by religion but recognized through it
· Interpretation of religious texts must accord with justice
· Governments claiming Islamic legitimacy must be judged by justice standards
· Justice includes conception of human dignity and inalienable rights[18]
This theological approach allows reformist clerics to argue that the regime's human rights violations, corruption, and authoritarianism disqualify it as Islamic regardless of its claims to religious authority.
Maslaha (Public Interest) and Necessity
Even within traditional jurisprudence, the principle of maslaha (public interest/welfare) provides grounds for political reform. When the regime's policies demonstrably harm the Muslim community—through economic collapse, international isolation, corruption—clerics can invoke maslaha to argue for systemic change.[19]
Khomeini himself invoked maslaha to justify absolute power, claiming "divine government" could override Sharia if necessary to serve Islam's interests. Reformist clerics can reverse this logic: if public welfare justifies suspending Sharia, it certainly justifies changing political leadership when that leadership threatens Muslim community's survival.[19]
The Corruption of Religious Authority: Systemic Not Incidental
The Prophesied Decline
Revolutionary cleric Mohammad-Reza Mahdavi-Kani warned in the early 1990s—with "unimpeachable revolutionary credentials"—that "clerics were becoming corrupted by power and wealth, that they were losing the affections of the faithful". His prophecy has materialized:[20]
· Mosque attendance has dropped precipitously despite state pressure[20]
· Growth of "mullah-hostile, populist Shiism" among the poor[20]
· Public expression of Muslim fraternity distances itself from state-controlled mosques and imams[20]
· "Significant distance between clerical class and people...people lost trust" per Qom cleric Naser Alavi[21]
This represents catastrophic legitimacy collapse. The regime that claims Islamic authority presides over mass alienation from Islamic institutions it controls.
Economic Empire of the Clerical Elite
The ruling clergy has transformed revolutionary institutions into criminal enterprises:
· IRGC controls 40-70% of economy through monopolies, smuggling, front companies[22][23][24][25][26]
· Supreme Leader controls vast financial resources (Setad Ejraie, Khatam al-Anbiya, Astan-e Quds) totaling 60% of national wealth with zero parliamentary oversight[22]
· Corruption "constantly being reproduced" due to lack of accountability[22]
· Bodies formed to "wipe out poverty" turned into conglomerates owning half Iran's wealth[27][28]
Reformist cleric Mehdi Karroubi's 2018 letter to Khamenei detailed this systematic theft: IRGC economic role has "tarnished reputation...drowned it in massive corruption". The Assembly of Experts became "ceremonial council that only praises the Leader" rather than supervising him. By 2025, Karroubi directly blamed Khamenei for "destroying economy, culture, security and ethics".[28][29][30][27]
This corruption provides powerful theological ammunition: a regime drowning in criminality cannot claim Islamic legitimacy. The Prophet Muhammad emphasized that leaders who steal from the community forfeit their right to rule. The Quran condemns those who "consume people's wealth unjustly" (2:188).
The Crisis of Khamenei's Religious Credentials
A fundamental vulnerability: Ali Khamenei lacks the religious qualifications his position theoretically requires.[31][12][1]
The Legitimacy Gap
· Khamenei is a middle-rank cleric, never achieving Grand Ayatollah status through traditional scholarship[32][12][31][1]
· Cut short his seminary education in 1964 to return to Mashhad, never obtaining requisite credentials[32]
· Khomeini himself merged dual roles: marja (source of emulation) + Supreme Leader[12][9]
· After Khomeini's death, Khamenei's elevation violated the system's own logic[9][12]
The regime attempted to manufacture legitimacy through unprecedented state intervention in religious hierarchy:[31][12]
· "First instance of state institutions utilized to promote cleric as source of emulation"[12][31]
· Mobilized state media, patronage networks, security apparatus to position Khamenei as grand ayatollah[31][12]
· Society of Qom Seminary Teachers (pro-government body) issued lists of "suitable maraji" including Khamenei[9]
· Initially ignored Grand Ayatollah Sistani, later forced to include him when his authority became undeniable[9]
This manufactured authority contrasts sharply with traditional marjai system where believers voluntarily choose their source of emulation based on scholarship and piety, not state propaganda. The manipulation exposes regime's awareness that Khamenei lacks organic religious legitimacy.[9]
Comparison with Grand Ayatollahs
Genuine Grand Ayatollahs possess:
· Decades of advanced scholarship in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), principles (usul), Quranic exegesis, hadith
· Recognition by peers (ahl al-khibra—people of experience, senior scholars)[9]
· Voluntary following of believers who choose to emulate their rulings[9]
· Financial independence through religious taxes (khums, zakat) paid directly by followers[31]
Khamenei possesses none of these organically. His authority flows from political position and coercive power, not religious scholarship. This creates opportunity: clerics with superior credentials can challenge his religious legitimacy directly.
Part II: How Dissident Mullahs Can Galvanize the Revolution
The Strategic Importance of Clerical Opposition
Why Clerics Matter for Revolutionary Success
Historical analysis of Iranian political movements reveals a consistent pattern: successful movements required clerical participation.[33][7][34][35]
The Constitutional Revolution (1905-1911):
· Clerics mobilized ordinary people through religious language, metaphors, and tools[33]
· Used manifestos, fatwas, letters, and treatises against the Shah[33]
· "Passionate preachers" mobilized bazaaris against Russian Bank[33]
· Coalition of ulama (religious legitimacy) + intellectuals (theory) + bazaaris (finance)[33]
The Iranian Revolution (1979):
· Ulama's "organisational structure and power...played a vital role"[34]
· Used mosques, seminaries, religious centers as mobilization networks[32][33]
· Translated political/economic grievances into "religious symbolism" accessible to traditional populations[34]
· Khomeini's cassette tapes distributed through religious networks[32]
· "In a state in which Shi'a Islam provided the only safe form of protest...this proved crucial"[34]
The Green Movement's Failure (2009):
· Initially lacked religious legitimacy and clerical support[7]
· Could not effectively connect to Islamic principles while regime used velayat-e faqih platform[7]
· Montazeri provided support but most senior clerics kept distance[36]
· Analysis concludes: "Any future democratic reform strategy in Iran must combine grassroots effort with religious/clerical and bazaari support"[7]
The 2025-2026 uprising faces similar challenge: massive protests but lack of unified ideological framework and leadership. Clerical participation could provide both.[37][38][39]
Unique Advantages of Clerical Opposition
1. Religious Legitimacy
· Can contest regime's Islamic claims on theological grounds[1]
· Reach traditional/religious populations skeptical of secular opposition[6][34]
· Provide moral authority that transcends political factionalism[6]
2. Organizational Infrastructure
· Mosques, seminaries (hozeh), religious schools as communication networks[32][33]
· Friday prayer platforms reaching millions[40]
· Traditional funding mechanisms independent of state (though regime tries to control)[31][9]
· Hierarchical structure allowing coordination[35][33]
3. Cross-Class Appeal
· Historical connection to bazaaris (merchant class)[41][33]
· Influence among rural and traditional urban populations[6][34]
· Credibility with older generations who remember clerical opposition to Shah[33]
4. International Dimensions
· Najaf clerics (especially Sistani) provide alternative model of religious authority[42][9]
· Diaspora clerics articulate reformist theology safely from abroad[5][18]
· Islamic human rights discourse gains traction internationally[43][5]
5. Ideological Clarity
· Can articulate positive vision: "Islamic democracy" not just anti-regime sentiment[11][18]
· Offer continuity with Iranian religious identity while transforming politics[6]
· Neutralize regime's accusations of "anti-Islamic" opposition[1][6]
Theological Weapons: Fatwas and Religious Rulings Against the Regime
The Power of Counter-Fatwas
The regime weaponizes fatwas (religious edicts) to crush dissent. In June 2025, Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi issued fatwa declaring threats against Khamenei as moharebeh (waging war against God), punishable by death. Over 400 Qom clerics endorsed it.[44][45][46]
But fatwas can be wielded against the regime. Montazeri demonstrated this in 2009 when he issued fatwas calling the Supreme Leader illegitimate and saying he was working with the government against religion. He called on people to take action against injustice "even if they have to pay a heavy price".[47]
Strategic counter-fatwas dissident clerics could issue:
1. Fatwa Declaring Khamenei's Leadership Illegitimate
· Based on his insufficient religious credentials[12][1][31]
· Violation of Islamic principles of justice, consultation, accountability[14]
· Systematic corruption and oppression disqualifying him as wali-ye faqih[48][27]
2. Fatwa on Duty to Oppose Tyranny (Zulm)
· Quranic injunction: "Do not obey the oppressors" (Quran 11:113)
· Prophetic tradition: "The best jihad is a word of truth before a tyrannical ruler"
· Imam Hussein's uprising against Yazid as paradigm for opposing illegitimate authority[34]
3. Fatwa on Security Forces' Obligation
· Islamic law forbids killing innocent people
· Orders to suppress peaceful protesters are haram (forbidden)
· Security personnel have religious duty to disobey unlawful commands
· Those who defect fulfill Islamic obligation; those who obey share guilt
4. Fatwa on Economic Justice
· Systematic theft through corruption violates Islamic property rights
· Leaders who steal from the ummah forfeit legitimacy
· Muslims have duty to recover stolen wealth for community benefit
5. Fatwa on Free Elections and Popular Sovereignty
· Shura (consultation) as Quranic mandate[16][19]
· Islamic government requires consent of governed, expressed through free elections
· Rigged elections violate Islamic principle of amanah (trust)
Mobilizing the Karbala Paradigm—Against the Regime
The regime has long exploited the Karbala paradigm—the martyrdom of Imam Hussein against the tyrant Yazid—to mobilize supporters. Revolutionary Iran frames itself as continuing Hussein's struggle against oppression.[49][34]
Dissident clerics must reclaim this narrative:
· Khamenei is Yazid: The tyrannical ruler who claims religious legitimacy while oppressing believers
· Protesters are Hussein's followers: Refusing to pledge allegiance (bay'ah) to illegitimate authority
· Martyred protesters are true Husseiniyoun: Sacrificing for justice against tyranny
· Security forces face Hussein's choice: Stand with justice or enable tyranny
This reframing is devastating because it uses the regime's own symbolic language against it. The emotional resonance of Karbala in Shia consciousness makes this paradigm shift potentially explosive.[49][34]
Practical Strategies for Clerical Mobilization
Phase 1: Clandestine Network Building (Current)
Objective: Create coordinated network of dissident clerics willing to issue public religious challenges to regime.
Actions:
1. Identify sympathetic clerics across spectrum:
o Reform-minded mullahs in Qom, Mashhad, Isfahan seminaries
o Mid-rank clerics frustrated with corruption and declining legitimacy[21][20]
o Junior clerics educated in reformist tradition (students of Montazeri, Sanei, Kadivar)
o Clerics with family/social connections to protesters
2. Secure communication channels:
o Use encrypted platforms for coordination
o Diaspora clerics facilitate communication
o Learn from historical networks: how Khomeini's cassette tapes circulated[32]
3. Develop theological arsenal:
o Coordinate on religious arguments and citations
o Pre-draft fatwas for rapid deployment
o Prepare responses to regime's religious justifications
o Create accessible religious pamphlets for distribution
4. Build financial independence:
o Cultivate relationships with bazaaris and private donors
o Reject state funding and control
o Traditional khums/zakat collection outside regime channels[31]
5. Connect with Najaf clerics:
o Sistani's alternative model provides theological backing[42][9]
o Najaf tradition legitimizes opposition to absolute velayat-e faqih[42]
o Iraqi clerics can speak with relative safety
Phase 2: Public Religious Challenges (Escalation)
Objective: Break regime's monopoly on Islamic discourse through coordinated public religious dissent.
Actions:
A. The Fatwa Offensive
· Multiple senior clerics simultaneously issue fatwas challenging regime legitimacy
· Coordinate timing with major protests for maximum impact
· Ensure wide distribution through social media, religious networks, international media
B. Friday Prayer Defiance
· Reformist clerics use Friday prayer platforms to deliver critical sermons
· Reference Montazeri, Sanei, Shariatmadari as religious authorities
· Articulate Islamic case for human rights, democracy, justice[50][51][5]
· Accept likelihood of arrest—martyrdom for religious truth enhances credibility
C. Seminary Strikes and Declarations
· Students and faculty in Qom, Mashhad, Isfahan declare opposition
· Issue collective statements signed by dozens/hundreds of clerics
· Seminary strikes (historical precedent from Constitutional Revolution)[33]
· Rejection of state control over religious education[48]
D. Ritual Resistance
· Refuse to lead state-approved religious ceremonies
· Decline to issue religious endorsements of regime policies
· Withhold religious legitimation of elections, referendums
· Public mourning ceremonies for martyred protesters using Karbala symbolism
E. Theological Publishing Campaign
· Circulate Montazeri's, Kadivar's, Sanei's critiques widely
· Translate reformist theology into accessible formats
· Use social media to spread religious arguments for democracy
· Create video sermons distributed via Telegram, WhatsApp, YouTube
Phase 3: Coalition Building with Other Opposition Forces
Objective: Integrate clerical opposition into broader revolutionary movement while providing religious legitimacy.
Actions:
1. Coordinate with secular opposition:
o Provide theological framework that doesn't require secular state
o "Islamic democracy" as bridge concept[11][18]
o Ensure protesters understand clerical support for their cause
o Joint statements emphasizing shared goals: justice, freedom, accountability
2. Engage bazaaris:
o Historical clergy-bazaar alliance critical[41][7][33]
o Religious arguments against corruption resonate with merchant class
o Clerical backing provides moral cover for economic strikes
3. Reach security forces:
o Issue religious rulings absolving security personnel who defect
o Frame continued service to regime as sinful complicity
o Offer religious legitimation for military/police refusal to suppress protests
o Promise integration and honor in post-regime order
4. Connect with ethnic/religious minorities:
o Sanei's egalitarian rulings on minorities provide model[51][52][5]
o Reformist clerics articulate inclusive Islamic vision
o Distinguish between regime's oppression and genuine Shia tradition
o Build trust with Kurds, Azeris, Arabs, Baluch, Sunnis, Baha'is
5. Leverage international support:
o Diaspora clerics act as international spokespeople
o Frame opposition in Islamic human rights terms[43][5]
o Coordinate with international Islamic scholars condemning regime
o Use international platforms to delegitimize regime's religious claims
Phase 4: Post-Regime Transition Role
Objective: Dissident clerics facilitate legitimate transition while preventing emergence of new tyranny.
Actions:
1. Provide religious legitimacy for transitional government:
o Issue fatwas recognizing transitional authority
o Mobilize followers to support stabilization
o Use religious platforms to preach reconciliation and order
2. Articulate constitutional principles:
o Advocate for constitutional framework separating religious and political authority[10][11]
o Elected government with clerical oversight, not clerical rule[13][42]
o Enshrine human rights, popular sovereignty, rule of law[18][14]
3. Truth and reconciliation:
o Religious framework for justice and forgiveness
o Distinguish between leaders (prosecute) and followers (reconcile)
o Islamic emphasis on repentance and mercy for those who confess
4. Reestablish healthy clergy-state relationship:
o Return to traditional marja'iyat system: pluralistic, voluntary, independent[9]
o Clerics as moral voices and social service providers, not rulers
o Religious institutions funded by believers, not state control[31]
o Quietist tradition of supervising justice without monopolizing power[8][42]
5. Religious education reform:
o Purge seminaries of regime ideology
o Restore intellectual pluralism in religious scholarship
o Integrate human rights and democratic theory into clerical curriculum
o Train new generation of clerics committed to reformist theology
Addressing Challenges and Risks
Challenge 1: "Most Senior Clerics Support the Regime"
Reality: The Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom and many prominent clerics back Khamenei. They issued fatwas supporting protester executions and death penalties for regime critics.[45][46][21]
Response:
This reflects state control and coercion, not genuine clerical consensus. Many clerics support regime because:[21][20]
· Fear of persecution (Montazeri's fate is warning)[15]
· Financial dependence on state funding[31]
· Career advancement tied to loyalty[40]
· Surveillance and intimidation[32]
But cracks are visible:
· Individual clerics publicly opposing execution fatwas[21]
· Acknowledgment of "distance between clerical class and people"[21]
· Young seminary students questioning regime ideology[53]
· Video of cleric cursing Khomeini and Khamenei circulating[54]
Strategic response: Focus on creating permission structure for dissent. Once a few senior clerics break ranks publicly, others will follow. Historical pattern: mass movements create space for previously silent dissidents to speak.
Challenge 2: "Clerical Opposition Will Be Violently Suppressed"
Accurate: The regime will arrest, torture, and potentially kill dissident clerics. Montazeri was imprisoned and house-arrested. Abdollah Nuri was "mentally ruined in prison". Clerics face same repression as other dissidents.[55][15]
Response:
This is price of revolutionary commitment. But clerical martyrdom carries unique power:
· Religious symbolism: Clerics suffering for faith creates powerful narrative
· Exposes hypocrisy: "Islamic" regime torturing Islamic scholars
· Karbala parallel: Reinforces Hussein paradigm—truth-speakers persecuted by tyrants[34]
· International attention: Clerical persecution generates global Islamic condemnation
Diaspora clerics can operate safely while domestic clerics accept risks. Mix of external voices (safety) and internal voices (authenticity) maximizes impact.
Challenge 3: "Anti-Clerical Sentiment is High—Why Would People Follow Mullahs?"
Legitimate concern: Protesters are attacking seminaries and clerics. Public anger at clerical class is intense.[2][3][4][20]
Response:
The fury is directed at regime clerics, not religious authority per se. People distinguish between:[3]
· Regime mullahs: State-appointed, defending oppression, living lavishly
· Genuine religious figures: Independent, defending justice, living modestly
Historical evidence: Iranians have repeatedly followed dissident clerics when they opposed tyranny:
· Constitutional Revolution: clerics led popular movement[33]
· 1979 Revolution: clerics mobilized masses against Shah[35][34]
· 2009 Green Movement: Montazeri's support gave legitimacy[36][47]
Key strategic move: Dissident clerics must publicly and dramatically break with regime, demonstrating they stand with the people against oppression. Acts like:
· Joining protests despite arrest risk
· Issuing fatwas against Khamenei
· Refusing state benefits and positions
· Visiting martyrs' families and blessing resistance
These actions transform "clerics" from "them" (enemy) to "us" (allies in struggle).
Challenge 4: "This Leads to Another Islamic Republic, Not True Freedom"
Valid concern: Why should Iranians trust that dissident clerics won't create another theocracy once in power?
Response:
The reformist clerical vision is fundamentally different from Khomeini's system:
Khomeini's model:
· Absolute velayat-e faqih with unchecked power
· Clerical monopoly on political authority
· Divine appointment, not popular election
· Leader above law and constitution
Reformist model (Montazeri, Kadivar, Soroush):[10][11][18][14]
· Limited clerical role: oversight, not rule
· Popular sovereignty expressed through free elections
· Term limits and accountability for all officials
· Constitutional protection of human rights
· Separation of religious and political authority
· No individual or institution above law
Safeguards:
1. Constitutional guarantees: Explicit provisions limiting clerical power
2. International monitoring: Transition supervised with external accountability
3. Diverse coalition: Secular democrats, minorities, women in transitional government
4. Historical learning: Acknowledge 1979 revolution's mistakes; commitment to not repeat
5. Sistani model: Iraqi example of clerical oversight without direct rule[42]
The key argument: Religious society can have religious government without theocratic dictatorship. Democracy and Islam are compatible when properly understood.[5][19][18][14]
Part III: The Revolutionary Moment and Strategic Imperative
Why Clerical Opposition Matters Now
The current crisis (2025-2026) creates unprecedented conditions for clerical intervention:
1. Regime Legitimacy Collapse
· All pillars of legitimacy failing: Islamic, revolutionary, performance[56][57]
· "Rupture in state-society relationship"[58]
· Even religious basis questioned by public[56][20]
2. Economic Catastrophe
· Currency collapse, hyperinflation, mass poverty[59][60][61]
· Corruption acknowledged even by regime officials[62][63][22]
· Economic arguments for regime change resonate across society[61][64]
3. Regional Defeats
· "Axis of resistance" in ruins: Syria, Hezbollah, Hamas weakened[30][65][59]
· Regional strategy demonstrated failure and waste[66][61]
4. Elite Fragmentation
· Former officials publicly attacking Khamenei[29][27][28][30]
· Factional disputes intensified[67][30]
· Loss of elite cohesion historically precedes collapse[68][69]
5. Security Force Strain
· Bandwidth constraints evident[70]
· Reports of defections[71][72][73][74]
· Economic pressure affects security personnel equally[64][75]
6. International Pressure
· U.S. and European support for protesters[39][37]
· Potential for international recognition of transitional government[37][39]
In this context, clerical opposition could be decisive catalyst. The regime's last source of legitimacy is religious. When that foundation crumbles through clerical repudiation, the entire edifice collapses.
The Theological Mandate for Action
Dissident clerics face religious obligation to act. Islamic jurisprudence establishes clear principles:
Obligation to Command Good and Forbid Evil (Amr bil-Ma'ruf wa Nahi anil-Munkar)
· Quranic command: "Let there arise from you a group inviting to all that is good, enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong" (3:104)
· Silence in face of oppression is sinful complicity
· Scholarly class has greatest responsibility due to knowledge and authority
Prohibition of Tyranny (Zulm)
· Islamic tradition: tyranny is among greatest sins
· Prophetic hadith: "Help your brother whether he is oppressor or oppressed"—when asked how to help oppressor, Prophet said "By preventing him from oppressing"
· Clerics who enable tyranny through silence or support share moral guilt
Hussein's Example
· Refusing illegitimate authority even at cost of life
· "If you believe not in religion and fear not the resurrection day, at least be free in your present life"—Hussein's letter
· Revolutionary martyrdom for justice as highest religious calling[34]
Trust and Accountability (Amanah)
· Religious knowledge is trust that must be used for community benefit
· Scholars who possess truth but withhold it betray sacred trust
· Clerics have duty to speak truth to power, especially when people suffer
Historical Vindication and Future Judgment
When historians and theologians examine this period, they will ask: Where were the clerics when Iran suffered under corrupt, oppressive rule masquerading as Islamic governance?
Dissident clerics who act will be remembered as:
· Heirs to Montazeri's courage and principle
· Defenders of genuine Islam against its perversion
· Saviors of Shia tradition from association with tyranny
· Patriots who chose nation and faith over personal safety
Regime clerics who support Khamenei will be remembered as:
· Collaborators with corruption and oppression
· Betrayers of Islamic principles for power and wealth
· Distorters of religion to serve political interests
· Responsible for Iranians' alienation from faith[20]
The choice is existential not just politically but theologically. Supporting this regime means complicity in its crimes. Opposing it fulfills the highest religious obligations.
Conclusion: The Unique Revolutionary Potential of Dissident Clerics
This thesis has demonstrated that anti-regime mullahs possess unique capacity to galvanize revolutionary regime change through:
1. Theological Legitimacy: Devastating religious critiques that expose the regime's Islamic claims as fraudulent[47][1][14]
2. Ideological Clarity: Articulation of Islamic democracy as positive alternative, not mere negation[11][18]
3. Organizational Infrastructure: Mosques, seminaries, religious networks for mobilization[32][33]
4. Cross-Class Appeal: Ability to reach traditional/rural populations unreachable by secular opposition[6][34]
5. Symbolic Power: Wielding Karbala paradigm and Islamic martyrdom narratives against regime[34]
6. International Dimensions: Connection to broader Islamic world through Najaf clerics and diaspora networks[5][42]
7. Coalition Building: Bridge between secular democrats, ethnic minorities, and religious traditionalists[7]
The Islamic Republic's fatal contradiction is that it requires religious legitimacy it increasingly lacks. When senior clerics with impeccable credentials declare the regime un-Islamic, tyrannical, and illegitimate, the foundation crumbles.[47][1]
The current uprising reveals both crisis and opportunity. Iranians are assaulting symbols of clerical authority—but this reflects fury at 47 years of oppression by regime clerics, not rejection of Islam itself. Dissident clerics can channel this energy by demonstrating that Islam belongs to the people, not the regime.[4][3][1][5]
The path is clear but requires courage. Dissident clerics must:
· Issue coordinated fatwas declaring regime illegitimate[47]
· Provide Islamic justification for resistance, security force defection, revolutionary action
· Articulate positive vision of Islamic democracy with human rights, rule of law, popular sovereignty[11][18][14]
· Build coalitions with secular opposition, minorities, and international supporters[7]
· Accept martyrdom risk as religious duty and revolutionary necessity[34]
History demonstrates that when clerics stand with the people against tyranny, revolutions succeed. When they remain silent or support oppression, they share responsibility for continued suffering.[20][33][34]
The theological mandate is clear. The strategic opportunity is unprecedented. The choice facing Iran's dissident clerics will define both their legacy and Iran's future.
Those who act fulfill Islam's highest calling: commanding good, forbidding evil, and sacrificing for justice. Those who remain silent betray their faith, their scholarship, and their nation. The revolution awaits its religious voice. The people await their clerical champions.
The time for theological timidity has ended. The revolution requires its mullahs.
⁂
1. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/world/middleeast/22ayatollah.html
2. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/08/world/middleeast/iran-protests-internet-shutdown.html
3. https://futureuae.com/.tar/Mainpage/Item/8260/unmasking-the-motives-the-rising-tide-of-violent-attacks-on-clerics-in-iran
4. https://www.internazionale.it/ultime-notizie-reuters/2026/01/09/iran-s-rulers-face-legitimacy-crisis-amid-spreading-unrest
5. https://opencanada.org/the-key-to-religious-freedom-in-iran/
6. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/reformist-islam-versus-radical-islam-in-iran/
7. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1221&context=jss
8. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/05169097
9. https://pomeps.org/the-najafi-marjaiyya-in-the-age-of-irans-vali-ye-faqih-guardian-jurist-can-it-resist
10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardianship_of_the_Islamic_Jurist
11. https://omerjournal.com/2022/11/24/yearning-for-a-regular-life-the-failure-of-reform-in-the-islamic-republic/
12. https://pomeps.org/the-ayatollahs-and-the-republic-the-religious-establishment-in-iran-and-its-interaction-with-the-islamic-republic
13. https://theyonseijournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/velayat-e-faqih-in-contemporary-iran.pdf
14. https://english.kadivar.com/2011/11/13/wilayat-al-faqih-and-democracy/
15. https://www.aei.org/articles/the-myth-of-moderate-mullahs/
16. http://jips.isca.ac.ir/article_66680.html
17. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/download/22067/6478
18. https://cdn.cfr.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2005/08/Religion_Politics_in_Iran.pdf
19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_democracy
20. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/03/15/how-irans-regime-is-threatened-by-its-clerics/
21. https://religionunplugged.com/news/2023/6/2/in-the-name-of-religion-irans-clerics-divided-over-executions-of-protesters
22. https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/economy/irans-regime-acknowledges-increase-of-state-linked-corruption/
23. https://struanstevenson.com/news-and-views/articles/venal-corruption-iranian-regime/
24. https://freeiransn.com/how-the-irgcs-corruption-and-monopolies-have-destroyed-iranian-industry/
25. https://gulfif.org/the-economic-empire-of-the-revolutionary-guards-in-iran/
26. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-10743580
27. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/iran-karroubi-khamenei-criticism-1.4510013
28. https://www.zawya.com/en/business/iranian-opposition-cleric-accuses-khamenei-of-abuse-of-power-f7xqrlhp
29. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202510308841
30. https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/irans-ruling-establishment-faces-multi-front-crisis-as-internal-rifts-intensify/
31. https://journals.umt.edu.pk/index.php/JITC/article/download/6311/3085/
32. https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/supreme-leader/pre-revolutionary-political-activism
33. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/267123
34. https://www.e-ir.info/2019/09/03/revolutionary-religion-shia-islam-and-the-iranian-revolution/
35. http://proceeding.conferenceworld.in/ICMR-2019/4p4427xvH3059.pdf
36. https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/arbeitspapiere/PoschGreenStruggle.ks.pdf
37. https://www.stimson.org/2026/in-iran-protests-information-spreads-faster-than-organization/
38. https://www.eurotopics.net/en/350733/protests-in-iran-regime-change-on-the-cards
39. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/what-to-watch-as-anti-regime-protests-engulf-iran/
40. https://iranwire.com/en/politics/136791-the-fall-of-an-ayatollah-whispers-of-succession-in-iran/
41. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025–2026_Iranian_protests
42. https://ijtihadnet.com/wilayat-al-faqih-in-the-view-of-ayatollah-sistani/
43. http://drsoroush.com/PDF/E-CMO-20041000-The_Search_for_Human_Rights-Shadi_Mokhatri.pdf
44. https://nationalsecuritynews.com/2025/07/iranian-clerics-issue-a-fatwa-against-trump/
45. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202507138096
46. https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2025/06/30/iranian-senior-clerics-issue-fatwas-over-threats-against-ayatollah-khamenei/
47. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2009/07/grand-ayatollah-montazeris-fatwa.html
48. https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-karoubi-letter-attacks-khamenei/29007440.html
49. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20581831.2025.2559490
50. https://iranhrdc.org/gender-inequality-and-discrimination-the-case-of-iranian-women/
51. https://sicm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Booklet-v0.2.pdf
52. https://www.bohrium.com/paper-details/ayatollah-yusuf-sanei-s-contribution-to-the-discourse-of-women-s-rights/812027505136369664-23049
53. https://www.inss.org.il/private/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/02/Iranians-Turn-Away-from-the-Islamic-Republic.pdf
54. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTOVUW0EtBd/
55. https://www.iranrights.org/library/document/3906
56. https://dawnmena.org/irans-current-uprising-and-the-collapse-of-ideological-legitimacy/
57. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/middle-east/irans-rulers-face-legitimacy-crisis-amid-spreading-unrest
58. https://mojust.org/2026/01/08/iran-the-rupture-of-legitimacy-and-the-security-cartel/
59. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/irans-2025-2026-uprising-anatomy-regime-crisis-harshad-shah-aeb3f
60. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/29/world/middleeast/iran-currency-collapse-rial-inflation-protests.html
61. https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/01/07/on-the-ground-in-iran-ailing-economy-pushes-nation-toward-a-defining-moment/
62. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202512308810
63. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/iransource/corruption-sanctions-mismangement-iran/
64. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/31/protests-in-iran-spread-amid-deep-discontent-over-economic-duress
65. https://newlinesinstitute.org/strategic-competition/regional-competition/real-time-analysis-iran-after-the-israeli-strikes-regime-change-remains-unlikely-but-not-impossible/
66. https://lansinginstitute.org/2026/01/02/irans-protests-drivers-actors-consequences-and-external-dimensions/
67. https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/iran-updates-october-2025
68. https://academic.oup.com/book/2739/chapter/143212547
69. https://academic.oup.com/isr/article/27/4/viaf033/8402320
70. https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/iran-update-january-8-2026
71. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202507150372
72. https://www.facebook.com/IsraelNewsAgency/posts/growing-defection-patterns-within-iranian-military-ranks-police-sections-and-var/1248418907330643/
73. https://www.facebook.com/gghamari/posts/️breaking-from-iran️police-defect-from-the-terrorist-islamic-republic-and-side-w/1266775605267775/
74. https://www.facebook.com/IranIntlEnglish/posts/reza-pahlavi-the-exiled-son-of-irans-last-shah-told-politico-that-at-least-50000/1243814714422286/
75. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/r1n6vm2ewl
76. https://socialistproject.ca/2022/12/iran-secular-revolt-against-clerical-tyranny/
77. https://academic.oup.com/book/25914/chapter/193649259
78. https://www.hudson.org/national-security-defense/the-iranian-clergy-s-silence-
79. https://www.facebook.com/gghamari/posts/iranians-are-now-going-after-islamic-regime-mullahs-in-islamic-seminaries-and-ye/1267599665185369/
80. https://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/38971-ayatollah-sistani-and-wilayat-e-faqih/
81. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2025.2566533
82. https://www.facebook.com/TELEGRAPH.CO.UK/posts/-over-the-past-decade-iran-has-faced-more-widespread-protests-than-the-current-u/1307494921425137/
83. https://www.oasiscenter.eu/en/iran-critics-guardianship-jurisconsult
84. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1479&context=jcl
85. https://www.facebook.com/RabbiWolpe/posts/quiet-advice-to-the-opposition-in-iran-if-the-humanitarian-silence-is-astonishin/1432017168295431/
86. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08974454.2021.1975015
87. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202209307324
88. https://www.cfr.org/interview/reform-and-womens-rights-movements-intertwined-iran
89. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cre28d2j2zxo
90. https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-882841
91. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601061105
92. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2009/8/27/cleric-calls-iran-leaders-despotic
93. https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-crisis-update-december-30/
94. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/download/22067/6478/71176 https://www.oasiscenter.eu/en/how-shiite-clergy-entered-politics
The current uprising (2025-2026) reveals unprecedented anti-clerical sentiment—seminaries invaded, mullahs assaulted, Khomeini's ancestral home burned. Yet this very crisis creates strategic opportunity: reformist clerics can reclaim Islam from the regime's monopoly, channeling popular fury toward ideological regime change rather than wholesale rejection of Shia tradition. By articulating Islamic arguments for democracy, human rights, and popular sovereignty, dissident clerics can provide the theological framework for legitimate transition while mobilizing constituencies unreachable by secular opposition.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
Part I: Theocratic and Ideological Critiques of the Current Regime
The Fundamental Heresy: Absolute Velayat-e Faqih as Innovation in Shia Doctrine
Historical Deviation from Quietist Tradition
For 14 centuries, Shia Islam was dominated by quietist clerics who advocated indirect involvement in politics or no involvement at all. This was not passivity but theological principle: in the absence of the Twelfth Imam (who went into occultation in 941 CE), clerics should focus on religious guidance, supervise government from a distance, and await the Mahdi's return to establish perfect governance.[8]
The quietist tradition created a decentralized, pluralistic clerical structure where believers chose which marja (source of emulation) to follow based on scholarship, piety, and wisdom. Multiple grand ayatollahs coexisted, competing peacefully for followers through superior jurisprudence rather than state coercion. This poly-cephalic system prevented any single cleric from monopolizing religious authority.[9]
Khomeini's innovation fundamentally broke this 14-century tradition. His theory of velayat-e faqih—particularly in its absolute form (velayat-e motlaqaye faqih)—grants the Supreme Leader near-divine authority that can "suspend essential rites of Islam" and demands obedience "as incumbent as performance of prayer". This represents what traditional quietist clerics view as "heretical innovation" (bid'ah) in Shia doctrine.[10][8]
Montazeri's Devastating Religious Critique
Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri (1922-2009) embodies the tragic arc of the revolution. As the original architect of velayat-e faqih and Khomeini's designated successor, his eventual repudiation of the system carries unparalleled weight. Montazeri possessed what Khamenei lacks: supreme religious credentials as a Grand Ayatollah and marja. When he turned against absolute guardianship, he wielded religious authority that could "undermine Khamenei's legitimacy more than anyone else on the planet".[11][12][10][1]
Montazeri's theological critique centered on incompatibility with Islamic principles of justice and consultation (shura):
1. Democratic constraints required: The Supreme Leader should be subject to popular election, term limits, and genuine accountability—making him a "religious-ideological guardian" rather than absolute ruler[13][10][11]
2. Accountability to people: The faqih must answer to representatives of the people, not rule by divine appointment beyond scrutiny[14][13]
3. Human rights as Islamic imperative: Defending rights of minorities (including Baha'is), arguing they are "citizens of this country...must benefit from Islamic compassion which is stressed in Quran"[5]
4. Rejection of political monopoly: The clergy's concentration of power betrays the revolution's promise and corrupts religious authority[1]
The regime's response revealed its theological bankruptcy: Montazeri was placed under house arrest and "mentally ruined in prison". When he died in 2009, state news agencies refused to use his title "Ayatollah"—a petty denial that only highlighted their inability to refute his religious arguments. His critiques "from a religious standpoint" were "particularly damaging" because "the regime seeks to assert that its lack of democracy is irrelevant because it is Islamic. He insists it is not an Islamic government".[15][5][1]
Kadivar's Systematic Demolition of Theological Legitimacy
Reformist cleric and scholar Mohsen Kadivar has provided the most systematic theological deconstruction of absolute velayat-e faqih, demonstrating four fundamental contradictions with both democracy and Islamic principles:[14]
1. Guardianship (Wilayat) Violates Equality
· Velayat-e faqih assumes the general public lacks capacity for pious decision-making equal to jurists
· Contradicts Quranic emphasis on human dignity and equal standing before God
· In democracy, everyone has equal rights and equal capacity to influence public domain
· Islamic tradition of shura (consultation) implies recognition of people's judgment[16][14]
2. Absolutism (Itlaq) Violates Rule of Law
· All democratic officials have limited, checked powers
· Absolute velayat-e faqih grants unchecked, unlimited power to one individual
· The Supreme Leader stands above the law, can repeal the Constitution
· Islamic jurisprudence traditionally emphasized limits even on prophets and imams[14]
3. Appointment Violates Popular Sovereignty
· Velayat-e faqih presents leadership as divine appointment, not popular choice
· Contradicts Islamic tradition where even the first Caliphs required bay'ah (pledge of allegiance) from community
· Historical Shia practice: even designation of successor required community acceptance[17][14]
4. Leader Above Law Violates Justice ('Adl)
· In democracy, no one stands above law—not even highest official
· Velayat-e faqih makes leader the source of law, capable of overriding any statute
· Islamic principle of justice requires rulers to be bound by same laws as ruled[18][14]
Kadivar concludes bluntly: "The wilayat al-faqih, being an autocratic rule of God based on the divine rights of the jurists, is incompatible with democracy" and represents "religious dictatorship". Even proponents of the theory who call it democratic are "clearly wrong...either due to lack of understanding democracy, or for future deniability".[14]
The Theological Case for Popular Sovereignty in Islam
Dissident clerics have developed sophisticated Islamic arguments for democracy and human rights that directly challenge the regime's monopoly on religious interpretation.
The Principle of Shura (Consultation)
Traditional Islamic political thought emphasizes shura—consultation with community representatives—as mandatory, not optional. The Quran explicitly commands: "And those who have responded to their lord and established prayer and whose affair is [determined by] consultation among themselves" (42:38).[19][16]
Reformist clerics argue that shura in modern context requires:
· Representative institutions (parliament) where people's delegates make decisions
· Majority rule in matters not explicitly determined by clear religious text
· Accountability mechanisms where leaders answer to elected representatives
· Separation of powers to prevent tyrannical concentration[16]
The Constitutional Revolution of 1906 saw clerics like Allameh Naeini reconcile parliamentary democracy with Shia jurisprudence by grounding parliament in the principle of shura. This demonstrates historical precedent for clerical support of democratic institutions.[16]
Justice ('Adl) as Primary Principle
Abdolkarim Soroush and other reformist thinkers argue that justice precedes and judges religious interpretation, not the reverse. "We do not draw justice from religion, but accept religion because it is just". This revolutionary formulation means:[18]
· Human rights are not granted by religion but recognized through it
· Interpretation of religious texts must accord with justice
· Governments claiming Islamic legitimacy must be judged by justice standards
· Justice includes conception of human dignity and inalienable rights[18]
This theological approach allows reformist clerics to argue that the regime's human rights violations, corruption, and authoritarianism disqualify it as Islamic regardless of its claims to religious authority.
Maslaha (Public Interest) and Necessity
Even within traditional jurisprudence, the principle of maslaha (public interest/welfare) provides grounds for political reform. When the regime's policies demonstrably harm the Muslim community—through economic collapse, international isolation, corruption—clerics can invoke maslaha to argue for systemic change.[19]
Khomeini himself invoked maslaha to justify absolute power, claiming "divine government" could override Sharia if necessary to serve Islam's interests. Reformist clerics can reverse this logic: if public welfare justifies suspending Sharia, it certainly justifies changing political leadership when that leadership threatens Muslim community's survival.[19]
The Corruption of Religious Authority: Systemic Not Incidental
The Prophesied Decline
Revolutionary cleric Mohammad-Reza Mahdavi-Kani warned in the early 1990s—with "unimpeachable revolutionary credentials"—that "clerics were becoming corrupted by power and wealth, that they were losing the affections of the faithful". His prophecy has materialized:[20]
· Mosque attendance has dropped precipitously despite state pressure[20]
· Growth of "mullah-hostile, populist Shiism" among the poor[20]
· Public expression of Muslim fraternity distances itself from state-controlled mosques and imams[20]
· "Significant distance between clerical class and people...people lost trust" per Qom cleric Naser Alavi[21]
This represents catastrophic legitimacy collapse. The regime that claims Islamic authority presides over mass alienation from Islamic institutions it controls.
Economic Empire of the Clerical Elite
The ruling clergy has transformed revolutionary institutions into criminal enterprises:
· IRGC controls 40-70% of economy through monopolies, smuggling, front companies[22][23][24][25][26]
· Supreme Leader controls vast financial resources (Setad Ejraie, Khatam al-Anbiya, Astan-e Quds) totaling 60% of national wealth with zero parliamentary oversight[22]
· Corruption "constantly being reproduced" due to lack of accountability[22]
· Bodies formed to "wipe out poverty" turned into conglomerates owning half Iran's wealth[27][28]
Reformist cleric Mehdi Karroubi's 2018 letter to Khamenei detailed this systematic theft: IRGC economic role has "tarnished reputation...drowned it in massive corruption". The Assembly of Experts became "ceremonial council that only praises the Leader" rather than supervising him. By 2025, Karroubi directly blamed Khamenei for "destroying economy, culture, security and ethics".[28][29][30][27]
This corruption provides powerful theological ammunition: a regime drowning in criminality cannot claim Islamic legitimacy. The Prophet Muhammad emphasized that leaders who steal from the community forfeit their right to rule. The Quran condemns those who "consume people's wealth unjustly" (2:188).
The Crisis of Khamenei's Religious Credentials
A fundamental vulnerability: Ali Khamenei lacks the religious qualifications his position theoretically requires.[31][12][1]
The Legitimacy Gap
· Khamenei is a middle-rank cleric, never achieving Grand Ayatollah status through traditional scholarship[32][12][31][1]
· Cut short his seminary education in 1964 to return to Mashhad, never obtaining requisite credentials[32]
· Khomeini himself merged dual roles: marja (source of emulation) + Supreme Leader[12][9]
· After Khomeini's death, Khamenei's elevation violated the system's own logic[9][12]
The regime attempted to manufacture legitimacy through unprecedented state intervention in religious hierarchy:[31][12]
· "First instance of state institutions utilized to promote cleric as source of emulation"[12][31]
· Mobilized state media, patronage networks, security apparatus to position Khamenei as grand ayatollah[31][12]
· Society of Qom Seminary Teachers (pro-government body) issued lists of "suitable maraji" including Khamenei[9]
· Initially ignored Grand Ayatollah Sistani, later forced to include him when his authority became undeniable[9]
This manufactured authority contrasts sharply with traditional marjai system where believers voluntarily choose their source of emulation based on scholarship and piety, not state propaganda. The manipulation exposes regime's awareness that Khamenei lacks organic religious legitimacy.[9]
Comparison with Grand Ayatollahs
Genuine Grand Ayatollahs possess:
· Decades of advanced scholarship in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), principles (usul), Quranic exegesis, hadith
· Recognition by peers (ahl al-khibra—people of experience, senior scholars)[9]
· Voluntary following of believers who choose to emulate their rulings[9]
· Financial independence through religious taxes (khums, zakat) paid directly by followers[31]
Khamenei possesses none of these organically. His authority flows from political position and coercive power, not religious scholarship. This creates opportunity: clerics with superior credentials can challenge his religious legitimacy directly.
Part II: How Dissident Mullahs Can Galvanize the Revolution
The Strategic Importance of Clerical Opposition
Why Clerics Matter for Revolutionary Success
Historical analysis of Iranian political movements reveals a consistent pattern: successful movements required clerical participation.[33][7][34][35]
The Constitutional Revolution (1905-1911):
· Clerics mobilized ordinary people through religious language, metaphors, and tools[33]
· Used manifestos, fatwas, letters, and treatises against the Shah[33]
· "Passionate preachers" mobilized bazaaris against Russian Bank[33]
· Coalition of ulama (religious legitimacy) + intellectuals (theory) + bazaaris (finance)[33]
The Iranian Revolution (1979):
· Ulama's "organisational structure and power...played a vital role"[34]
· Used mosques, seminaries, religious centers as mobilization networks[32][33]
· Translated political/economic grievances into "religious symbolism" accessible to traditional populations[34]
· Khomeini's cassette tapes distributed through religious networks[32]
· "In a state in which Shi'a Islam provided the only safe form of protest...this proved crucial"[34]
The Green Movement's Failure (2009):
· Initially lacked religious legitimacy and clerical support[7]
· Could not effectively connect to Islamic principles while regime used velayat-e faqih platform[7]
· Montazeri provided support but most senior clerics kept distance[36]
· Analysis concludes: "Any future democratic reform strategy in Iran must combine grassroots effort with religious/clerical and bazaari support"[7]
The 2025-2026 uprising faces similar challenge: massive protests but lack of unified ideological framework and leadership. Clerical participation could provide both.[37][38][39]
Unique Advantages of Clerical Opposition
1. Religious Legitimacy
· Can contest regime's Islamic claims on theological grounds[1]
· Reach traditional/religious populations skeptical of secular opposition[6][34]
· Provide moral authority that transcends political factionalism[6]
2. Organizational Infrastructure
· Mosques, seminaries (hozeh), religious schools as communication networks[32][33]
· Friday prayer platforms reaching millions[40]
· Traditional funding mechanisms independent of state (though regime tries to control)[31][9]
· Hierarchical structure allowing coordination[35][33]
3. Cross-Class Appeal
· Historical connection to bazaaris (merchant class)[41][33]
· Influence among rural and traditional urban populations[6][34]
· Credibility with older generations who remember clerical opposition to Shah[33]
4. International Dimensions
· Najaf clerics (especially Sistani) provide alternative model of religious authority[42][9]
· Diaspora clerics articulate reformist theology safely from abroad[5][18]
· Islamic human rights discourse gains traction internationally[43][5]
5. Ideological Clarity
· Can articulate positive vision: "Islamic democracy" not just anti-regime sentiment[11][18]
· Offer continuity with Iranian religious identity while transforming politics[6]
· Neutralize regime's accusations of "anti-Islamic" opposition[1][6]
Theological Weapons: Fatwas and Religious Rulings Against the Regime
The Power of Counter-Fatwas
The regime weaponizes fatwas (religious edicts) to crush dissent. In June 2025, Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi issued fatwa declaring threats against Khamenei as moharebeh (waging war against God), punishable by death. Over 400 Qom clerics endorsed it.[44][45][46]
But fatwas can be wielded against the regime. Montazeri demonstrated this in 2009 when he issued fatwas calling the Supreme Leader illegitimate and saying he was working with the government against religion. He called on people to take action against injustice "even if they have to pay a heavy price".[47]
Strategic counter-fatwas dissident clerics could issue:
1. Fatwa Declaring Khamenei's Leadership Illegitimate
· Based on his insufficient religious credentials[12][1][31]
· Violation of Islamic principles of justice, consultation, accountability[14]
· Systematic corruption and oppression disqualifying him as wali-ye faqih[48][27]
2. Fatwa on Duty to Oppose Tyranny (Zulm)
· Quranic injunction: "Do not obey the oppressors" (Quran 11:113)
· Prophetic tradition: "The best jihad is a word of truth before a tyrannical ruler"
· Imam Hussein's uprising against Yazid as paradigm for opposing illegitimate authority[34]
3. Fatwa on Security Forces' Obligation
· Islamic law forbids killing innocent people
· Orders to suppress peaceful protesters are haram (forbidden)
· Security personnel have religious duty to disobey unlawful commands
· Those who defect fulfill Islamic obligation; those who obey share guilt
4. Fatwa on Economic Justice
· Systematic theft through corruption violates Islamic property rights
· Leaders who steal from the ummah forfeit legitimacy
· Muslims have duty to recover stolen wealth for community benefit
5. Fatwa on Free Elections and Popular Sovereignty
· Shura (consultation) as Quranic mandate[16][19]
· Islamic government requires consent of governed, expressed through free elections
· Rigged elections violate Islamic principle of amanah (trust)
Mobilizing the Karbala Paradigm—Against the Regime
The regime has long exploited the Karbala paradigm—the martyrdom of Imam Hussein against the tyrant Yazid—to mobilize supporters. Revolutionary Iran frames itself as continuing Hussein's struggle against oppression.[49][34]
Dissident clerics must reclaim this narrative:
· Khamenei is Yazid: The tyrannical ruler who claims religious legitimacy while oppressing believers
· Protesters are Hussein's followers: Refusing to pledge allegiance (bay'ah) to illegitimate authority
· Martyred protesters are true Husseiniyoun: Sacrificing for justice against tyranny
· Security forces face Hussein's choice: Stand with justice or enable tyranny
This reframing is devastating because it uses the regime's own symbolic language against it. The emotional resonance of Karbala in Shia consciousness makes this paradigm shift potentially explosive.[49][34]
Practical Strategies for Clerical Mobilization
Phase 1: Clandestine Network Building (Current)
Objective: Create coordinated network of dissident clerics willing to issue public religious challenges to regime.
Actions:
1. Identify sympathetic clerics across spectrum:
o Reform-minded mullahs in Qom, Mashhad, Isfahan seminaries
o Mid-rank clerics frustrated with corruption and declining legitimacy[21][20]
o Junior clerics educated in reformist tradition (students of Montazeri, Sanei, Kadivar)
o Clerics with family/social connections to protesters
2. Secure communication channels:
o Use encrypted platforms for coordination
o Diaspora clerics facilitate communication
o Learn from historical networks: how Khomeini's cassette tapes circulated[32]
3. Develop theological arsenal:
o Coordinate on religious arguments and citations
o Pre-draft fatwas for rapid deployment
o Prepare responses to regime's religious justifications
o Create accessible religious pamphlets for distribution
4. Build financial independence:
o Cultivate relationships with bazaaris and private donors
o Reject state funding and control
o Traditional khums/zakat collection outside regime channels[31]
5. Connect with Najaf clerics:
o Sistani's alternative model provides theological backing[42][9]
o Najaf tradition legitimizes opposition to absolute velayat-e faqih[42]
o Iraqi clerics can speak with relative safety
Phase 2: Public Religious Challenges (Escalation)
Objective: Break regime's monopoly on Islamic discourse through coordinated public religious dissent.
Actions:
A. The Fatwa Offensive
· Multiple senior clerics simultaneously issue fatwas challenging regime legitimacy
· Coordinate timing with major protests for maximum impact
· Ensure wide distribution through social media, religious networks, international media
B. Friday Prayer Defiance
· Reformist clerics use Friday prayer platforms to deliver critical sermons
· Reference Montazeri, Sanei, Shariatmadari as religious authorities
· Articulate Islamic case for human rights, democracy, justice[50][51][5]
· Accept likelihood of arrest—martyrdom for religious truth enhances credibility
C. Seminary Strikes and Declarations
· Students and faculty in Qom, Mashhad, Isfahan declare opposition
· Issue collective statements signed by dozens/hundreds of clerics
· Seminary strikes (historical precedent from Constitutional Revolution)[33]
· Rejection of state control over religious education[48]
D. Ritual Resistance
· Refuse to lead state-approved religious ceremonies
· Decline to issue religious endorsements of regime policies
· Withhold religious legitimation of elections, referendums
· Public mourning ceremonies for martyred protesters using Karbala symbolism
E. Theological Publishing Campaign
· Circulate Montazeri's, Kadivar's, Sanei's critiques widely
· Translate reformist theology into accessible formats
· Use social media to spread religious arguments for democracy
· Create video sermons distributed via Telegram, WhatsApp, YouTube
Phase 3: Coalition Building with Other Opposition Forces
Objective: Integrate clerical opposition into broader revolutionary movement while providing religious legitimacy.
Actions:
1. Coordinate with secular opposition:
o Provide theological framework that doesn't require secular state
o "Islamic democracy" as bridge concept[11][18]
o Ensure protesters understand clerical support for their cause
o Joint statements emphasizing shared goals: justice, freedom, accountability
2. Engage bazaaris:
o Historical clergy-bazaar alliance critical[41][7][33]
o Religious arguments against corruption resonate with merchant class
o Clerical backing provides moral cover for economic strikes
3. Reach security forces:
o Issue religious rulings absolving security personnel who defect
o Frame continued service to regime as sinful complicity
o Offer religious legitimation for military/police refusal to suppress protests
o Promise integration and honor in post-regime order
4. Connect with ethnic/religious minorities:
o Sanei's egalitarian rulings on minorities provide model[51][52][5]
o Reformist clerics articulate inclusive Islamic vision
o Distinguish between regime's oppression and genuine Shia tradition
o Build trust with Kurds, Azeris, Arabs, Baluch, Sunnis, Baha'is
5. Leverage international support:
o Diaspora clerics act as international spokespeople
o Frame opposition in Islamic human rights terms[43][5]
o Coordinate with international Islamic scholars condemning regime
o Use international platforms to delegitimize regime's religious claims
Phase 4: Post-Regime Transition Role
Objective: Dissident clerics facilitate legitimate transition while preventing emergence of new tyranny.
Actions:
1. Provide religious legitimacy for transitional government:
o Issue fatwas recognizing transitional authority
o Mobilize followers to support stabilization
o Use religious platforms to preach reconciliation and order
2. Articulate constitutional principles:
o Advocate for constitutional framework separating religious and political authority[10][11]
o Elected government with clerical oversight, not clerical rule[13][42]
o Enshrine human rights, popular sovereignty, rule of law[18][14]
3. Truth and reconciliation:
o Religious framework for justice and forgiveness
o Distinguish between leaders (prosecute) and followers (reconcile)
o Islamic emphasis on repentance and mercy for those who confess
4. Reestablish healthy clergy-state relationship:
o Return to traditional marja'iyat system: pluralistic, voluntary, independent[9]
o Clerics as moral voices and social service providers, not rulers
o Religious institutions funded by believers, not state control[31]
o Quietist tradition of supervising justice without monopolizing power[8][42]
5. Religious education reform:
o Purge seminaries of regime ideology
o Restore intellectual pluralism in religious scholarship
o Integrate human rights and democratic theory into clerical curriculum
o Train new generation of clerics committed to reformist theology
Addressing Challenges and Risks
Challenge 1: "Most Senior Clerics Support the Regime"
Reality: The Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom and many prominent clerics back Khamenei. They issued fatwas supporting protester executions and death penalties for regime critics.[45][46][21]
Response:
This reflects state control and coercion, not genuine clerical consensus. Many clerics support regime because:[21][20]
· Fear of persecution (Montazeri's fate is warning)[15]
· Financial dependence on state funding[31]
· Career advancement tied to loyalty[40]
· Surveillance and intimidation[32]
But cracks are visible:
· Individual clerics publicly opposing execution fatwas[21]
· Acknowledgment of "distance between clerical class and people"[21]
· Young seminary students questioning regime ideology[53]
· Video of cleric cursing Khomeini and Khamenei circulating[54]
Strategic response: Focus on creating permission structure for dissent. Once a few senior clerics break ranks publicly, others will follow. Historical pattern: mass movements create space for previously silent dissidents to speak.
Challenge 2: "Clerical Opposition Will Be Violently Suppressed"
Accurate: The regime will arrest, torture, and potentially kill dissident clerics. Montazeri was imprisoned and house-arrested. Abdollah Nuri was "mentally ruined in prison". Clerics face same repression as other dissidents.[55][15]
Response:
This is price of revolutionary commitment. But clerical martyrdom carries unique power:
· Religious symbolism: Clerics suffering for faith creates powerful narrative
· Exposes hypocrisy: "Islamic" regime torturing Islamic scholars
· Karbala parallel: Reinforces Hussein paradigm—truth-speakers persecuted by tyrants[34]
· International attention: Clerical persecution generates global Islamic condemnation
Diaspora clerics can operate safely while domestic clerics accept risks. Mix of external voices (safety) and internal voices (authenticity) maximizes impact.
Challenge 3: "Anti-Clerical Sentiment is High—Why Would People Follow Mullahs?"
Legitimate concern: Protesters are attacking seminaries and clerics. Public anger at clerical class is intense.[2][3][4][20]
Response:
The fury is directed at regime clerics, not religious authority per se. People distinguish between:[3]
· Regime mullahs: State-appointed, defending oppression, living lavishly
· Genuine religious figures: Independent, defending justice, living modestly
Historical evidence: Iranians have repeatedly followed dissident clerics when they opposed tyranny:
· Constitutional Revolution: clerics led popular movement[33]
· 1979 Revolution: clerics mobilized masses against Shah[35][34]
· 2009 Green Movement: Montazeri's support gave legitimacy[36][47]
Key strategic move: Dissident clerics must publicly and dramatically break with regime, demonstrating they stand with the people against oppression. Acts like:
· Joining protests despite arrest risk
· Issuing fatwas against Khamenei
· Refusing state benefits and positions
· Visiting martyrs' families and blessing resistance
These actions transform "clerics" from "them" (enemy) to "us" (allies in struggle).
Challenge 4: "This Leads to Another Islamic Republic, Not True Freedom"
Valid concern: Why should Iranians trust that dissident clerics won't create another theocracy once in power?
Response:
The reformist clerical vision is fundamentally different from Khomeini's system:
Khomeini's model:
· Absolute velayat-e faqih with unchecked power
· Clerical monopoly on political authority
· Divine appointment, not popular election
· Leader above law and constitution
Reformist model (Montazeri, Kadivar, Soroush):[10][11][18][14]
· Limited clerical role: oversight, not rule
· Popular sovereignty expressed through free elections
· Term limits and accountability for all officials
· Constitutional protection of human rights
· Separation of religious and political authority
· No individual or institution above law
Safeguards:
1. Constitutional guarantees: Explicit provisions limiting clerical power
2. International monitoring: Transition supervised with external accountability
3. Diverse coalition: Secular democrats, minorities, women in transitional government
4. Historical learning: Acknowledge 1979 revolution's mistakes; commitment to not repeat
5. Sistani model: Iraqi example of clerical oversight without direct rule[42]
The key argument: Religious society can have religious government without theocratic dictatorship. Democracy and Islam are compatible when properly understood.[5][19][18][14]
Part III: The Revolutionary Moment and Strategic Imperative
Why Clerical Opposition Matters Now
The current crisis (2025-2026) creates unprecedented conditions for clerical intervention:
1. Regime Legitimacy Collapse
· All pillars of legitimacy failing: Islamic, revolutionary, performance[56][57]
· "Rupture in state-society relationship"[58]
· Even religious basis questioned by public[56][20]
2. Economic Catastrophe
· Currency collapse, hyperinflation, mass poverty[59][60][61]
· Corruption acknowledged even by regime officials[62][63][22]
· Economic arguments for regime change resonate across society[61][64]
3. Regional Defeats
· "Axis of resistance" in ruins: Syria, Hezbollah, Hamas weakened[30][65][59]
· Regional strategy demonstrated failure and waste[66][61]
4. Elite Fragmentation
· Former officials publicly attacking Khamenei[29][27][28][30]
· Factional disputes intensified[67][30]
· Loss of elite cohesion historically precedes collapse[68][69]
5. Security Force Strain
· Bandwidth constraints evident[70]
· Reports of defections[71][72][73][74]
· Economic pressure affects security personnel equally[64][75]
6. International Pressure
· U.S. and European support for protesters[39][37]
· Potential for international recognition of transitional government[37][39]
In this context, clerical opposition could be decisive catalyst. The regime's last source of legitimacy is religious. When that foundation crumbles through clerical repudiation, the entire edifice collapses.
The Theological Mandate for Action
Dissident clerics face religious obligation to act. Islamic jurisprudence establishes clear principles:
Obligation to Command Good and Forbid Evil (Amr bil-Ma'ruf wa Nahi anil-Munkar)
· Quranic command: "Let there arise from you a group inviting to all that is good, enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong" (3:104)
· Silence in face of oppression is sinful complicity
· Scholarly class has greatest responsibility due to knowledge and authority
Prohibition of Tyranny (Zulm)
· Islamic tradition: tyranny is among greatest sins
· Prophetic hadith: "Help your brother whether he is oppressor or oppressed"—when asked how to help oppressor, Prophet said "By preventing him from oppressing"
· Clerics who enable tyranny through silence or support share moral guilt
Hussein's Example
· Refusing illegitimate authority even at cost of life
· "If you believe not in religion and fear not the resurrection day, at least be free in your present life"—Hussein's letter
· Revolutionary martyrdom for justice as highest religious calling[34]
Trust and Accountability (Amanah)
· Religious knowledge is trust that must be used for community benefit
· Scholars who possess truth but withhold it betray sacred trust
· Clerics have duty to speak truth to power, especially when people suffer
Historical Vindication and Future Judgment
When historians and theologians examine this period, they will ask: Where were the clerics when Iran suffered under corrupt, oppressive rule masquerading as Islamic governance?
Dissident clerics who act will be remembered as:
· Heirs to Montazeri's courage and principle
· Defenders of genuine Islam against its perversion
· Saviors of Shia tradition from association with tyranny
· Patriots who chose nation and faith over personal safety
Regime clerics who support Khamenei will be remembered as:
· Collaborators with corruption and oppression
· Betrayers of Islamic principles for power and wealth
· Distorters of religion to serve political interests
· Responsible for Iranians' alienation from faith[20]
The choice is existential not just politically but theologically. Supporting this regime means complicity in its crimes. Opposing it fulfills the highest religious obligations.
Conclusion: The Unique Revolutionary Potential of Dissident Clerics
This thesis has demonstrated that anti-regime mullahs possess unique capacity to galvanize revolutionary regime change through:
1. Theological Legitimacy: Devastating religious critiques that expose the regime's Islamic claims as fraudulent[47][1][14]
2. Ideological Clarity: Articulation of Islamic democracy as positive alternative, not mere negation[11][18]
3. Organizational Infrastructure: Mosques, seminaries, religious networks for mobilization[32][33]
4. Cross-Class Appeal: Ability to reach traditional/rural populations unreachable by secular opposition[6][34]
5. Symbolic Power: Wielding Karbala paradigm and Islamic martyrdom narratives against regime[34]
6. International Dimensions: Connection to broader Islamic world through Najaf clerics and diaspora networks[5][42]
7. Coalition Building: Bridge between secular democrats, ethnic minorities, and religious traditionalists[7]
The Islamic Republic's fatal contradiction is that it requires religious legitimacy it increasingly lacks. When senior clerics with impeccable credentials declare the regime un-Islamic, tyrannical, and illegitimate, the foundation crumbles.[47][1]
The current uprising reveals both crisis and opportunity. Iranians are assaulting symbols of clerical authority—but this reflects fury at 47 years of oppression by regime clerics, not rejection of Islam itself. Dissident clerics can channel this energy by demonstrating that Islam belongs to the people, not the regime.[4][3][1][5]
The path is clear but requires courage. Dissident clerics must:
· Issue coordinated fatwas declaring regime illegitimate[47]
· Provide Islamic justification for resistance, security force defection, revolutionary action
· Articulate positive vision of Islamic democracy with human rights, rule of law, popular sovereignty[11][18][14]
· Build coalitions with secular opposition, minorities, and international supporters[7]
· Accept martyrdom risk as religious duty and revolutionary necessity[34]
History demonstrates that when clerics stand with the people against tyranny, revolutions succeed. When they remain silent or support oppression, they share responsibility for continued suffering.[20][33][34]
The theological mandate is clear. The strategic opportunity is unprecedented. The choice facing Iran's dissident clerics will define both their legacy and Iran's future.
Those who act fulfill Islam's highest calling: commanding good, forbidding evil, and sacrificing for justice. Those who remain silent betray their faith, their scholarship, and their nation. The revolution awaits its religious voice. The people await their clerical champions.
The time for theological timidity has ended. The revolution requires its mullahs.
⁂
1. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/world/middleeast/22ayatollah.html
2. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/08/world/middleeast/iran-protests-internet-shutdown.html
3. https://futureuae.com/.tar/Mainpage/Item/8260/unmasking-the-motives-the-rising-tide-of-violent-attacks-on-clerics-in-iran
4. https://www.internazionale.it/ultime-notizie-reuters/2026/01/09/iran-s-rulers-face-legitimacy-crisis-amid-spreading-unrest
5. https://opencanada.org/the-key-to-religious-freedom-in-iran/
6. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/reformist-islam-versus-radical-islam-in-iran/
7. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1221&context=jss
8. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/05169097
9. https://pomeps.org/the-najafi-marjaiyya-in-the-age-of-irans-vali-ye-faqih-guardian-jurist-can-it-resist
10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardianship_of_the_Islamic_Jurist
11. https://omerjournal.com/2022/11/24/yearning-for-a-regular-life-the-failure-of-reform-in-the-islamic-republic/
12. https://pomeps.org/the-ayatollahs-and-the-republic-the-religious-establishment-in-iran-and-its-interaction-with-the-islamic-republic
13. https://theyonseijournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/velayat-e-faqih-in-contemporary-iran.pdf
14. https://english.kadivar.com/2011/11/13/wilayat-al-faqih-and-democracy/
15. https://www.aei.org/articles/the-myth-of-moderate-mullahs/
16. http://jips.isca.ac.ir/article_66680.html
17. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/download/22067/6478
18. https://cdn.cfr.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2005/08/Religion_Politics_in_Iran.pdf
19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_democracy
20. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/03/15/how-irans-regime-is-threatened-by-its-clerics/
21. https://religionunplugged.com/news/2023/6/2/in-the-name-of-religion-irans-clerics-divided-over-executions-of-protesters
22. https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/economy/irans-regime-acknowledges-increase-of-state-linked-corruption/
23. https://struanstevenson.com/news-and-views/articles/venal-corruption-iranian-regime/
24. https://freeiransn.com/how-the-irgcs-corruption-and-monopolies-have-destroyed-iranian-industry/
25. https://gulfif.org/the-economic-empire-of-the-revolutionary-guards-in-iran/
26. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-10743580
27. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/iran-karroubi-khamenei-criticism-1.4510013
28. https://www.zawya.com/en/business/iranian-opposition-cleric-accuses-khamenei-of-abuse-of-power-f7xqrlhp
29. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202510308841
30. https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/irans-ruling-establishment-faces-multi-front-crisis-as-internal-rifts-intensify/
31. https://journals.umt.edu.pk/index.php/JITC/article/download/6311/3085/
32. https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/supreme-leader/pre-revolutionary-political-activism
33. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/267123
34. https://www.e-ir.info/2019/09/03/revolutionary-religion-shia-islam-and-the-iranian-revolution/
35. http://proceeding.conferenceworld.in/ICMR-2019/4p4427xvH3059.pdf
36. https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/arbeitspapiere/PoschGreenStruggle.ks.pdf
37. https://www.stimson.org/2026/in-iran-protests-information-spreads-faster-than-organization/
38. https://www.eurotopics.net/en/350733/protests-in-iran-regime-change-on-the-cards
39. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/what-to-watch-as-anti-regime-protests-engulf-iran/
40. https://iranwire.com/en/politics/136791-the-fall-of-an-ayatollah-whispers-of-succession-in-iran/
41. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025–2026_Iranian_protests
42. https://ijtihadnet.com/wilayat-al-faqih-in-the-view-of-ayatollah-sistani/
43. http://drsoroush.com/PDF/E-CMO-20041000-The_Search_for_Human_Rights-Shadi_Mokhatri.pdf
44. https://nationalsecuritynews.com/2025/07/iranian-clerics-issue-a-fatwa-against-trump/
45. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202507138096
46. https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2025/06/30/iranian-senior-clerics-issue-fatwas-over-threats-against-ayatollah-khamenei/
47. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2009/07/grand-ayatollah-montazeris-fatwa.html
48. https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-karoubi-letter-attacks-khamenei/29007440.html
49. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20581831.2025.2559490
50. https://iranhrdc.org/gender-inequality-and-discrimination-the-case-of-iranian-women/
51. https://sicm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Booklet-v0.2.pdf
52. https://www.bohrium.com/paper-details/ayatollah-yusuf-sanei-s-contribution-to-the-discourse-of-women-s-rights/812027505136369664-23049
53. https://www.inss.org.il/private/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/02/Iranians-Turn-Away-from-the-Islamic-Republic.pdf
54. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTOVUW0EtBd/
55. https://www.iranrights.org/library/document/3906
56. https://dawnmena.org/irans-current-uprising-and-the-collapse-of-ideological-legitimacy/
57. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/middle-east/irans-rulers-face-legitimacy-crisis-amid-spreading-unrest
58. https://mojust.org/2026/01/08/iran-the-rupture-of-legitimacy-and-the-security-cartel/
59. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/irans-2025-2026-uprising-anatomy-regime-crisis-harshad-shah-aeb3f
60. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/29/world/middleeast/iran-currency-collapse-rial-inflation-protests.html
61. https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/01/07/on-the-ground-in-iran-ailing-economy-pushes-nation-toward-a-defining-moment/
62. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202512308810
63. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/iransource/corruption-sanctions-mismangement-iran/
64. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/31/protests-in-iran-spread-amid-deep-discontent-over-economic-duress
65. https://newlinesinstitute.org/strategic-competition/regional-competition/real-time-analysis-iran-after-the-israeli-strikes-regime-change-remains-unlikely-but-not-impossible/
66. https://lansinginstitute.org/2026/01/02/irans-protests-drivers-actors-consequences-and-external-dimensions/
67. https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/iran-updates-october-2025
68. https://academic.oup.com/book/2739/chapter/143212547
69. https://academic.oup.com/isr/article/27/4/viaf033/8402320
70. https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/iran-update-january-8-2026
71. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202507150372
72. https://www.facebook.com/IsraelNewsAgency/posts/growing-defection-patterns-within-iranian-military-ranks-police-sections-and-var/1248418907330643/
73. https://www.facebook.com/gghamari/posts/️breaking-from-iran️police-defect-from-the-terrorist-islamic-republic-and-side-w/1266775605267775/
74. https://www.facebook.com/IranIntlEnglish/posts/reza-pahlavi-the-exiled-son-of-irans-last-shah-told-politico-that-at-least-50000/1243814714422286/
75. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/r1n6vm2ewl
76. https://socialistproject.ca/2022/12/iran-secular-revolt-against-clerical-tyranny/
77. https://academic.oup.com/book/25914/chapter/193649259
78. https://www.hudson.org/national-security-defense/the-iranian-clergy-s-silence-
79. https://www.facebook.com/gghamari/posts/iranians-are-now-going-after-islamic-regime-mullahs-in-islamic-seminaries-and-ye/1267599665185369/
80. https://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/38971-ayatollah-sistani-and-wilayat-e-faqih/
81. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2025.2566533
82. https://www.facebook.com/TELEGRAPH.CO.UK/posts/-over-the-past-decade-iran-has-faced-more-widespread-protests-than-the-current-u/1307494921425137/
83. https://www.oasiscenter.eu/en/iran-critics-guardianship-jurisconsult
84. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1479&context=jcl
85. https://www.facebook.com/RabbiWolpe/posts/quiet-advice-to-the-opposition-in-iran-if-the-humanitarian-silence-is-astonishin/1432017168295431/
86. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08974454.2021.1975015
87. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202209307324
88. https://www.cfr.org/interview/reform-and-womens-rights-movements-intertwined-iran
89. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cre28d2j2zxo
90. https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-882841
91. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601061105
92. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2009/8/27/cleric-calls-iran-leaders-despotic
93. https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-crisis-update-december-30/
94. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/download/22067/6478/71176 https://www.oasiscenter.eu/en/how-shiite-clergy-entered-politics
