.
.
.
.
Ironically it was under the Republicans and that great statesman GW Bush junior that India actually at certain levels moved 'closer" to the USA, especially with the signing of the nuclear deal recently between the two nations. Not strategically, in the military sense, but certainly rhetorically with the aid of Bollywood and sections of the Indian media, exhausted with Congress Socialism and tickled by American Capitalism with all its glitter and allure has India psychologically, especially the upwardly mobile 300 million bracket in India moved closer to America. To like America is to be modern in India these days; to have American qualifications is the height of acceptance in Indian society, and no longer a qualification from Bilaat. Its cool to use American vernacular words into Hinglish like "cool" "dude" and other such un-English things.
This is all very naive, but there it is.
Why shouldn't India have good relations with ALL nations. Absolutely nothing wrong with it, as long as no naive assumptions are made about "special relationships".............where they don't really exist and never have existed, and might never exist. The USA is over there in the American continent, and India is in Asia. That is why India keeps its door open to the SCO.
The Democrats on the other hand have always been on the right side of India, especially since the 1960's, praising the country at many levels, but that is what it always was rhetoric. Bill Clinton made an official visit to India at the very end of his last term in 2000, and stayed for five days, and did absolutely NOTHING, signed absolutely NOTHING with India, which might have boosted trade between the two countries ( a real solidifier of bilateral relations) or maybe defense contracts between the two countries, with greater technology transfers...........and so on, NOTHING.
Why?
Jewish Communism. Most Jews consider Communism as an extension of their religion Judaism. Starting from Karl Marx we note the prominence of Jews in the Communist/Marxist/Socialist experiments around the world. Whilst Communism is a failed ideology, clearly the Jews have never lost faith in "their" ideology. Israel in many ways is a Communist/Socialist state, sustained by Capitalist America and the Jewish fraternity of Maddox et al..................so Jews have a "religious" belief about Communism which can be applied to gentiles without calling it a Jewish religion, upfront which might be reprehensible to many non-Jews.
Whilst the Jews don't normally pour their resources into every Communist country.........North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Angola don't have thousands upon thousands of American plants manufacturing American goods..........with the big Communist nations however, such as the Soviet Union and China, the Jew has paid special attention for obvious geo-strategic Jewish reasons.
It was pure American Capital and technical assistance which build up the Soviet Union from the 1920's, so that Europe's most backward nation rapidly turned into a mighty Industrial power by 1941, manufacturing 18.6 million tons of steel and 48.5 billion kwt of electricity, with a manufacturing capacity close to 45% of the USA............not bad in achieving such great feats in such a small time 1928--41, under the Stalin 5 year programs.
The Soviet military by 1941 had 6.7 million under arms; 24,000 tanks, 10,000 fighter planes. On paper the greatest power on earth, and had Stalin not purged the Soviet military officer class, in reality possibly the greatest military force on earth ready to conquer Europe first and then the rest of the world for the Jew. Then the Jew funded the other side, the Nazis, and built them up with funds from the 1920's......not gossip but actually documented.
Both policies are inexplicable on the one hand and understandable from the Jew perspective. Such policies cannot be possibly explained in terms of the actions of nation states, but in terms of powerful individuals and their religious and racial motivations in funding and backing such diverse groups as Nazis and Communists (I have covered this area before in previous posts, so I am repeating myself)
This is what has happened with Communist China since 1980. The progress of China is the achievement of Deng Xiaoping, and his modern and pragmatic reforms which have made investment and business much more easier within China, beyond ideological dogmatism, "Chinese Communism with two faces". However this is only part of the story.....the other part is the huge amounts of American investments into China, into the $100's of billions, and possibly trillions which now make China the greatest industrial power in the world, producing 500 million tons of steel, and 3,300 billion kwt of power, and the second greatest exporting nation.....................................again China's developments in such a short time have the shades and patterns of Soviet development where Jewish capital methodically moved huge amounts of capital and American technology into China, and especially under the Clinton administration in the 1990's.
From the Indian perspective it should also be noted that it was only under Communist China that India came to blows with her neighbor, and that before the advent of Communism in China, the two Asian giants never experienced any conflicts of any type for thousands of years, indeed quite the contrary. It is my firm belief that fundamentally there are no grounds for conflict between the two Asian giants, and that both can develop amicably as they have done for thousands of years. However having said this, one must not underestimate the power and drive of Jewish global ideology which sees and seeks conflict between nations, and from the conflict, the various strategic advantages that can be gained by the Jew economically, politically and strategically from such conflicts within those nations involved...........and thus in this light one must be wary of creating artificial negative "competitions' between nations and especially neighbors where there were non previously. That great nations do not fall for such games and tricks through the power and manipulation of national ego's and chauvinism. That we must learn from the experiences and ashes of German Nazism and Soviet Communism, both failed Jewish experiments that have left many 10's of millions dead.......we can avoid this.
So what can PM ManMohan Singh request for India which would increase and create real ties between the two nations, which Indians can believe in when he meets Obama next week?
1) American arms for Pakistan since the 1950's which is subsequently used against India in 1965, 1971, and 1999 wars. All this talk of warming ties between the two countries is great, and lets keep it coming, where's the harm? However wouldn't be great if for once America stopped arming Pakistan....giving Pakistan unofficially $10 billion worth of arms free since 2001, which Pakistan subsequently uses in investing in military systems against India. $10 billion worth of arms doesn't turn Pakistan into a superpower, but isn't it an indication of the inconsideration of America over India basic interests?
2) America is promising $15 billion for Pakistan over the next 10 years; $5 billion under the Kerry-Lugar proposal; $7.6 billion from the IMF. Thats a lot of financial commitment for Pakistan...whats India getting? Has India been consulted over this aid issue, and what consequences does such aid have for India? What is the American purpose of giving so much aid to Pakistan now?
3) America backed Zardari into power, and basically run the country through the military and chamars in the elite in Pakistan. Wouldn't it be considerate of India's interests by America if America for once backed a competent, India friendly civilian politician into power in Islamabad?
4) Trade is a great solidifier of relations between nations so why not an FTA between the USA and India. The USA has been signing FTA's with many other nations, so why not with India........it could be mutually beneficial.
