.
.
.
.
India is the 3rd largest economy on earth measured by PPP GDP---$7.5 trillion
India is a nuclear bomb power
India has the 4th most powerful military in the world after the USA, Russia, China.
Hilary Clinton and the USA say that they want to make India into a 'Great Power'--as a USA tool in Asia.
These factors should AUTOMATICALLY give India a PERMANENT seat in the UN security council.
But alas this has yet to be realized.......due to prejudice, racism, and competition from rivals.....OR the stupidity of Indian rulers. Take it how you will.
India will get its permanent seat in the UN security council, it is only a matter of time.
India was offered it in 1953, mainly supported by the USA, but Nehru turned it down, since he didn't want to upset the Soviet Union who wanted Communist China to get in first....and he thought it would tarnish his much loved non-alignment movement.
The worthless, idiot, bi-sexual deviant who did wonders for India.
______________________________________________
For US, India sole option for UNSC seat: Pakistani daily
.
The Times of India
India
is the only option from Asia, especially in the eyes of the US, for
permanent membership at the UN Security Council "no matter how
unfortunate this is for Pakistan", a Pakistani daily said on Friday.
Describing the US and India as the new dynamic duo, an editorial in the Nation said they are "a terrifying combination".
The US has reaffirmed its support to India for a permanent seat on the
UN Security Council (UNSC). Even though both countries have disagreed
over the UN Security Council reforms, the US has made it clear that it
is committed to India's inclusion as a permanent member of the Security
Council.
READ ALSO: US backs India's bid for permanent UNSC seat
"A number of members, including permanent members, have voiced strong
disagreements. Pakistan, a member of the Uniting for Consensus group of
countries which opposes any additional permanent members on the Security
Council, told the 193-member Assembly that the document was partial and
incomplete. It could not be the basis for a negotiated solution," it
said.
With the successful conduct of the maiden strategic and
commercial dialogue between India and the US, the stage is set for
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's third summit with President Barack
Obama on September 28.
"The United States also reiterated its
support for India's membership in four major global non-proliferation
export control regimes, including the Nuclear Suppliers Group," said the
daily.
"Pakistan should be worried."
READ ALSO: PM Modi seeks Irish help for NSG, UN Security Council entry
"Their joint declaration has identified terrorism as a profound threat
to global peace and security...They have pointed out 'the threat posed
by entities such as Al Qaeda and its affiliates, Lashkar-e-Taiba,
Jaish-e-Mohammad, D Company, and the Haqqani Network, and other regional
groups that seek to undermine stability in South Asia'," the editorial
noted.
It went on to say that India now has a powerful ally,
and "reason to remind us to provide justice for whatever wrong they
think we have committed".
"Both countries have already jointly
urged Pakistan to 'bring to justice the perpetrators of the 2008 Mumbai
attack'. Modi won't stop at this."
The editorial said that
China and Russia, as permanent members, can and probably will provide
balance to the US and Indian ambition.
"However, for the global
community, better representation is why the UNSC permanent membership
needed to be expanded in the first place. Asia has two permanent member
countries; hardly representative of the gigantic continent. South
America has none. Europe has two, and Germany has been gearing up for
its own bid for a seat. If Europe and South America get better
representation, it makes sense that Asia will too."
"India is the only option then, especially in the eyes of the US, no matter how unfortunate this is for Pakistan," it added.
