"Liberated Libya"

.
.
.
.
In "al-CIA-duh" Libya things are not so good, naturally.

The new NTC government is a puppet regime brought into power by the USA. Its ultimate master is the JEWSA.

Thousands of foreign USA/NATO troops are swarming into the country, to create more genocidal post-Saddam Iraq like conditions (2003--2011). But the blame will be put on the hapless divided Libyans, the actual victims...............all psychopaths tend to blame the victim, without the trouble of reflecting on their own crimes. That would be too human.

This is a foreboding, cautionary tale for Tunisia, Egypt where the USA trained generals betrayed their comrade, Hosni Mubarak(thu, thu, thu).......and Syria, should it allow itself to be defeated by NATO/USA through their "al-CIA-duh" proxies in Southern Turkey, and Lebanon.

The JEWSA, as with Iraq will steal billions $ worth of Libyan oil, the best and purest in the world, where many of the NATO/USA forces are currently heading, whilst simultaneously conducting destabilization of the country using the "El Salvador option".

The greater the stupidy of the camel drinking Arab leaders against their own interests, and their own people....the more problems for them and their people. This applies to crypto Jewish run Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the rest of the casino loving slaves of the JEWSA.

The Arab lives in one house, if one part catches fire, all of it will catch fire....and no amount of CIA/ State Department reassurance will save the entire Arab house.

There can be no peace with "al-CIA-duh" Wahabi Salafists regimes running Arab countries. There can be no power sharing agreements with these dogs. There can no elections whilst these fifth column dogs participate under their own names or through proxies.

____________________

Clashes, Torture on the Rise in ‘Disillusioned’ Libya

Public Seen Losing Faith in New US-Backed Regime

by Jason Ditz at antiwar.com

In “liberated” Libya, violence is on the rise as militias attack one another on a regular basis and seemingly everyone accuses everyone else of being a Gadhafi ally. Arrest, in this environment, often means open-ended detention without charges. And torture.

Nominally under the control of the US and NATO-backed National Transitional Council (NTC), this new Libya is a nation awash in arms and grudges, the product of an ugly civil war and an international community that seems determined to throw its weight behind any interested party still alive on the ground.

In one instance, a knife fight at a market between two men from neighboring towns culminated in the massing of troops and the kidnapping and torture death of an uninvolved resident of one of the towns. His wife has just given birth the day before. Each side claims the other are pro-Gadhafi fighters.

Western diplomats are shrugging off the problems as a “country coming down off a victory high.” But Libyans don’t trust their new interim government and mass protests are breaking out against the brand-new regime.

The NTC is looking to placate the public with a few token resignations, but the issue goes well beyond the unpopularity of a few late-in-the-game defectors from the old regime. The protests against the Gadhafi regime began with the hope of a free country, and the realization that the NTC commandeered their revolution — possibly replacing one tyrant with another — is not something that can be easily tamped down.

"al-CIA-duh" Libya to arm train "al-CIA-duh" in Syria

.
.
.
.

Libya to arm rebels in Syria

Ruth Sherlock at AP, The Telegraph and therearenosunglasses.com

A demonstration in favor of Bashar al-Assad. Photo: AP

Syrian rebels have held secret talks with Libya’s new authorities, aiming to secure weapons and money for their insurgency against Bashar al-Assad’s regime, it has been revealed.

At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included Turkish officials, the Syrians requested assistance from the Libyan representatives and were offered arms and, potentially, volunteers.

”There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria,” a Libyan source said, on condition of anonymity. ”There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you will see.”

It has also emerged that preliminary discussions about arms supplies took place when members of the Syrian National Council – the country’s main opposition movement – visited Libya earlier this month.

”The Libyans are offering money, training and weapons to the Syrian National Council,” said Wisam Taris, a human rights campaigner with links to the council.

The disclosure came as the Syrian military said rebels had raided an air force base outside the city of Homs and killed six pilots.

Rebel attacks have become daily occurrences since the onset of the insurrection. The conflict has claimed at least 3500 lives, mainly as part of a crackdown on protests by the government.

Syria’s regime has continued to defy pressure from the Arab League, ignoring Friday’s deadline to accept the deployment of 500 human rights observers, raising the possibility that economic sanctions might be agreed upon this weekend.

Last month, Libya’s interim government became the first in the world to recognise Syria’s opposition movement as the country’s ”legitimate authority”.

Activists said large shipments of weapons had not yet been sent, mainly because of logistical difficulties. But proposals for a ”buffer zone” inside Syria, monitored by the Arab League, or the likely emergence of an area inside the country controlled entirely by rebels could solve this problem.

”The [Libyan] council’s offer is serious,” Mr Taris said. Turkey, which has denounced Mr Assad’s regime, is already sheltering about 7000 Syrian opposition activists, including the leader of the Free Syrian Army, the nascent rebel movement, in a ”safe zone” along Turkey’s border with Syria.

Sources in the Libyan town of Misrata suggested that some weapons might already have been sent. Some smugglers were caught selling small arms to Syrian buyers in Misrata, said a man who trafficked guns to Libya’s rebels during the country’s civil war.

However, Libyan officials denied some of the claims. ”This is what you hear in the street,” said the leader of the Misrata military council, Ramadan Zarmoh. ”Officially there is none of this. I would never send any fighters to fight outside the country.”

Ministers from the Arab League are expected to meet in Cairo this weekend to consider sanctions against Syria.

The British Prime Minister, David Cameron, and his Qatari counterpart, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani, pledged on Friday to keep up talks with Syrian opposition groups in an attempt to support a transition to a stable democracy.

Meanwhile, a United Nations human rights panel has called on Syria to respond to reports its security forces had tortured children in their crackdown on anti-government protesters.

The Committee against Torture said in Geneva that it had received ”numerous, consistent and substantiated reports” of widespread abuse occurring since the start of the uprising against Mr Assad’s government eight months ago.

”Of particular concern are reports referring to children who have suffered torture and mutilation while detained,” said the panel’s chairman, Claudio Grossman.

He also cited reports of ”extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; arbitrary detention by police forces and the military; and enforced and involuntary disappearances.”

The committee normally reviews each country’s record every four years, but took the unusual step on Friday of issuing a spontaneous demand to the Syrian government to explain its actions.

Libya Weekend gossip.

.
.
.
.
I suppose the same "System" or "Game" applies to Nazi Germany 1933--1945......Western covert funding, and Hitler doubles and ruinous wars...."Operation paperclip" with Nazis being shipped to the USA and South America, and the USA/UK presented as the shining cavalry to the rescue.

Ditto Soviet Union 1918--1991.........anywhere else?

______________________

THE LIBYA MYSTERY DEEPENS by aangirfan.

Mystery man Gaddafi - Website for this image.

The CIA and its friends controlled many people in Gaddafi's Libya.

From The Africa Report (Libya: Who owns the revolution? - The Africa Report):

The CIA's clandestine supporters made it easy for NATO to take over Tripoli.

"According to Brigadier General Abdulsalam Alhasi, who commanded the rebel's headquarters in Benghazi, the role of the clandestine supporters - soldiers, policemen, intelligence officers and even ministers who had been working for Gaddafi - was critical in taking Tripoli."

In other words, it wasn't just Gaddafi, or his double, who had worked for the CIA and MI6. (Was Britain Behind Gadaffi's Coup in 1969?)

The CIA's Marty Martin, who had a plan for Gaddafi to leave Libya, reportedly.

The CIA's Marty Martin led the CIA's Qaeda department from 2002 to 2004

The CIA's Marty Martin was part of a US group that offered Gaddafi a $10m deal to flee Libya

The group included a Belgian named Dirk Borgers, Neil C Livingstone a terrorism specialist who wants to be governor of Montana, Neil S. Alpert who has worked for the Republican National Committee and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and Randell K. Wood, a Kansas City lawyer.

GADDAFI DOUBLE WAS KILLED / WHERE'S GADDAFI?

Gaddafi

The CIA put Nasser into power in Egypt;

and put Saddam into power in Iraq;

and put the Ayatollahs into power in Iran. (GADDAFI, SADDAM AND THE CIA / NASSER OF THE CIA/
IRAN IS RUN BY THE CIA)

There is a belief that it was the CIA and Britain's MI6 who put Gaddafi into power in 1969.

According to the article entitled: Was Britain Behind Gadaffi's Coup in 1969?:

A secret 1960 US National Security Council Report explained: "There is little loyalty to him (British puppet King Idris) among the younger urban elements who do not have significant political power now, but who will have such power in the future."

The US and UK needed a replacement for King Idris and apparently chose Gaddafi.

In 1965, Britain's Colonel Ted Lough reportedly made a series of reports on Gadaffi for British intelligence.

In 1966, Gaddafi spent four months in Britain, training with the British military.

In 1969, Gaddafi carried out a peaceful coup, apparently with the blessing of the USA and UK.

Gaddafi turned Libya from being the poorest country in the world into being the most prosperous country in Africa.

But, he did not always cooperate with his CIA backers.



Sirte in Libya

Libya is now in a ruinous state, according to the Financial Times, 18 November 2011 - FT.com

According to the Financial Times:

1. Rubbish now rots on streets.

2. Revolutionary militia are still on the streets.

3. According to Mahmoud Jibril, the outgoing provisional prime minister, the companies driven out by the war "don’t feel a sense of security and they use it as an excuse not to come back".

" The few representatives of oil companies and banks that have visited have departed hastily because of worries over security and a lack of a stable, legitimate government with the authority to set the country’s course."

4. "The expensive Great Manmade River system, which pumps fresh water from the desert to the cities, has dangerously depleted reservoirs in the country’s south."

5. Libya has more oil than any other country in Africa.

"Oil is also one sector that may be sewn up for now by companies that have been in Libya for years, such as Halliburton and Baker Hughes of the US, Total of France and Italy’s Eni."

6. During the first thirty years of Gaddafi’s rule, Gaddafi poured money into training doctors and building hospitals.

A western diplomat said: "They have very good doctors and medical facilities..."


Abdullah Naker and Abdel Hakim Belhadj are rival military commanders in Tripoli.

"Naker's men say Belhadj did not fight on the front lines during the war...

"Naker claims he has up to 20,000 fighters and rejects a role for Belhadj in the new government."

Naker "has warned that his men could overthrow the incoming government." (Rival Libyan rebel commanders beat chests)


Gaddafi was not all bad.

British economic journalists David Blundy and Andrew Lycett observed the following about LIBYA under Gaddafi:

"The young people are well dressed, well fed and well educated.

"Libyans now earn more per capita than the British.

"The disparity in annual incomes… is smaller than in most countries.

"Libya's wealth has been fairly spread throughout society.

"Every Libyan gets free, and often excellent, education, medical and health services.

"New colleges and hospitals are impressive by any international standard.

"All Libyans have a house or a flat, a car and most have televisions, video recorders and telephones.

"Compared with most citizens of the Third World countries, and with many in the First World, Libyans have it very good indeed."

http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=669913&publicationSubCategoryId=64

Libya

.
.
.
.

LIBYA IN CHAOS by aangirfan

"Most of the national councillors, including its chairman, Mustafa Abdel Jalil, and the emerging government’s prime minister, Mahmoud Jibril, are still in Benghazi, citing worries over security, or are abroad."

On 3 September 2011, The Economist reports on Libya:

1. Most of the leaders of the new government are scared to come to Tripoli.

Chairman, Mustafa Abdel Jalil, and prime minister, Mahmoud Jibril, are still in Benghazi.

2. Tripoli's new military commander, Abdel Hakim Bel Haj, has links to al Qaeda.

Abdel Hakim Bel Haj belonged to the Libyan Islamist Fighting Group, regarded as part of al-Qaeda.

The new Libya

3. The new government's militias are not popular.

The people of Tripoli "want them out".

4. Benghazi has around 40 private militias.

Many of the militias "have put more energy into protection rackets than into fighting..."

5. People are staying indoors due to a "lack of public services."

Tripoli has no running water.

Lack of electricity makes the city very black at night.

6. The price of potatoes has risen twentyfold.

7. Salaries are not being paid.

8. The price of petrol has risen from $8 a tank to $200.

9. Banks allow only very limited withdrawals.

10. Many hospitals are closed.


11. The Islamists and many of the returning exiles do not want reconciliation.

Some want to sack Jibril who has talked of reconciliation.

"The public demands fresh blood," says Abdulrazaq Mukhtar, a government minister.

The Islamists want Liamine Bel Haj, a Muslim Brother, as leader.

12. The Islamists are in a powerful position, having the support of Qatar.

13. The Islamists are suspected of killing Abdel Younis Fattah, the rebel commander who died outside Benghazi.

Further confirmation that Libya has been handed over to "al-Qaeda" with Western help.

.
.
.
.

Libya: The Greatest Betrayal

In handing Libya to Al Qaeda, the line has been forever crossed

Tony Cartalucci at Infowars.com

First – let’s not labor under any delusions. Obama, Cameron, and Sarkozy are heads of state in name only. It is the depravity and megalomania amongst the banks, corporations, and the institutions they have contrived, that are responsible for the most egregious betrayal in Western history. For 10 years the West’s leadership have stirred up hatred and fear amongst their populations to justify a lengthy and very costly global war that has sent US, British, Canadian, German, French, and many other troops, around the world, into dangerous adversity, and ultimately to their graves to fight “the forces of terror.”

Now, almost as if savoring the irony, the New York Times, on behalf of the corporate-financier oligarchs that presume dominion over the Western world, fully admit that Al Qaeda terrorists,

men who literally killed US troops in both Iraq and Afghanistan

are now in Libya and are the benefactors of billions of dollars in Western aid,

Diplomatic recognition,

Training,

Weapons,

The lending of intelligence assets,

The full unwavering support of the West’s “media,”

NATO-member air support,

AND even graced with Western special forces fighting side-by-side with them on the ground.

This timely confession is also in response in part to revelations that the Libyan rebel commander now filling the streets of Tripoli with indescribable horror is a hardcore Al Qaeda leader, reported first in the Telegraph months ago, and again this week on RT and covered in depth by respected geopolitical analyst Dr. Webster Tarpley.

While naive Americans are brimming with pride as the military machine bankrupting them into destitution rolls over another minute nation an ocean away, they seem ignorant or unable to wrap their minds around how egregiously they’ve been betrayed. After 10 years, thousands of dead troops, tens of thousands broken mentally or physically, an economy diverted to war, occupation, and “nation building” overseas while America’s infrastructure rots beneath her, the corporate-financier oligarchs have decided to betray and infinitely humiliate America’s armed forces in the worst manner imaginable – have them provide air cover, intel, and special operational support for blood-thirsty mercenaries that hunted and killed their brothers in arms for the past decade.

Entire families have been destroyed, communities devastated by the loss of their brothers and sisters, friends, mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, fighting what they thought was a war for the very survival of their way of life. Today, in Libya, with Al Qaeda literally being handed a nation-state by these corporate-financiers through their political and military proxies, the leaders we have elected and the corporations we have helped grow to monstrous proportions now squat upon the graves our nation’s fallen and defile their memories and the ideals they believed they were giving their lives for in an unforgivable way.

And while it will be claimed by many that this is “Obama’s War,” it most certainly is not. The very cadre of Neo-Conservatives that engineered the last decade of debilitating global war at the expense of American blood and treasure have been quietly cheerleading the expansion of NATO’s intervention in Libya. This can be seen in unequivocal terms in a letter written to US House Republicans imploring them to end their resistance to the current, unconstitutional war, and instead discard the UNSC resolution and give even more support for the terrorists seizing Libya on their behalf. Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Max Boot, Frederick Kagan, Karl Rove, Ellen Bork, Robert Kagan, Liz Cheney, William Kristol, Dan Senor, and James Woolsey are just some of the names of individuals that affixed their signatures at the bottom of this letter. Quite clearly, this is not exclusively “Obama’s War,” rather one engineered and promoted by the Fortune 500 banks and corporations that include both Obama and America’s most notorious Neo-Conservatives as loyal servants.

If ever there was a time for our military, not just the rank and file, but the officers that lead them and whose hands young fighting men put their lives into, to recall their oath given to the US Constitution and their duty to protect and defend their nation and their people, it would be now. If ever there was a time to recognize our self-proclaimed leadership, crutching their legitimacy along with the facade of “democracy” as the self-serving egregious traitors they are – the time is now. And when the people’s faith in their government falters, let us be vigilant against pretend reformers. Let us make sure military men stepping forward to rectify our nation’s slide into the surreal aren’t corporate-fascist serving Council on Foreign Relations members likeGeneral Stanley McChrystal or General David Petraeus, both of whom are guilty of helping to foist this facade upon the American people at tragic costs to us all.

For the average man or woman in America, now would be a good time to start putting these corporations and banks out of business. Boycott and replace them systematically, day to day, little by little. America has misplaced their faith in these world-spanning corporations and have traded their independence and self-reliance in for the illusion of convenience. It is time to take that independence back. It is also time to vote each and every incumbent out of office that has served these agendas and promoted this war, now exposed as an absolute hoax. Those like John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Joe Lieberman come particularly to mind. Finally, it is time to start getting organized as a community. Reach out to your neighbors, start a marksmanship club, help each other with starting a garden, and start standing up for one another when this corrupt, parasitic system comes searching for sustenance to continue fueling its dark deeds. By exercising each and every one of your Constitutional rights, collectively as a community and on a daily basis, you ensure their vigor in standing up against tyranny of all kinds.

Now is the time, this far and no further – if not for ourselves, for the thousands of Americans that shed their lives in the belief they did so for a higher cause and whose memories are now being defiled by the despicable actions of Wall Street and London, and the degenerate army of sycophants that serve them, from Europe to North America, from Israel’s leadership, to the corporate oligarchs that manipulate the people of Australia. This evil empire has reached an intolerable height.

For a list of the corporate-financier interests that truly run Western society please see, “Naming Names.” For more information on self-sufficiency please see, “The Globalsits’ Worst Nightmare.” To learn more about why and how to boycott the corporate-financiers that dominate our lives, please see, “Destroy the Globalists.”

"al-CIA-duh" in Libya.

.
.
.
.
The overthrow of Gaddafi's regime in Tripoli took place using Libyan Islamists drawn from the East of the country, Cyrenia, and Western Special Forces guiding and assisting the rebels, and finally Western Airpower.

So a guerrilla war very much like Iraq will continue against the Western occupation, which unlike Iraq will not have boots on the ground in the same numbers. In the Iraq invasion there were, "the United States (148,000), United Kingdom (45,000), Australia (2,000), and Poland (194)".....195,000 Western troops on the ground after the USA bribed Saddam's head of Intelligence, and most of the Generals not to resist the invasion.

The truncated Iraqi military of 400,000 thus surrendered without a fight. The Iraqi resistence subsequently was provided by the SUNNI fedayeen or peoples militia representing about 20% of the population, and gradually joined by ex-military personnel who longer had a job, or horrified by the treatment of the dominant SUNNI's by the Americans, or the treatment of their country generally by the occupiers.

In Libya, with a population one fourth of Iraq, and a small military force thus posed a far lessor challenge for the USA with its colonial ambitions, even though Gaddafi ironically was FAR MORE popular with his people, than CIA sadistic Saddam with his mass graves, endless wars against neighbors encouraged by the USA....and 30 odd palaces, whilst his people died around him from years of Western USA driven sanctions.

Gaddafi according to some sources made the mistake of letting his guard down against the West, especially after 2003.

He placed $110 billion of his nations assets in Western banks. This triggered the "Theft mentality" of Jewish banks in the West who saw an opportunity to steal the countries money. Ditto with the Shah of Iran and his petro-$ in Western Jewish banks.

He allowed greater cooperation and training between his forces and those of the West, thus giving the USA the opportunity to recruit spies within his security apparatus.

Gaddafi failed to develop a credible conventional military machine, which could effectively fight the Western neo-colonialists. Thus Gaddafi was overthrown by a rabble rag tag force of "al-CIA-duh" affiliated Islamists of how many....1000?....2000? and Western Special ops units.....working with Western airpower.

Gaddafi allowed his sons, educated in London/West to drive his key State policies.

Libya will now descend into chaos, slaughter and destruction al la Iraq.

Gaddafi, the dictator who united the nation and who was popular is no longer running the country, but will be fighting for it from the margins.

Mubarak under Egypt might have intervened to protect Gaddafi from the Western intervention, BUT USA bought the Egyptian generals who themselves toppled Mubarak have been absolutely silent in the face of naked Western colonial aggression against Libya, their neighbor.

These Egyptian Generals deserve the worst, betraying their leader, their country...and now silent whilst Western colonial forces trample and destroy their neighbor.

If today Libya, why not Egypt tomorrow after Syria?

Is Libya run by "al-CIA-duh" terrorists, with full diplomatic cooperation with Israel, and Western Special Ops troops on the ground good for Egypt? Good for the whole North Africa neighborhood?

What kind of worthless gay donkeys and dogs are the Egyptian Generals? Why did Algeria remain passive and silent?

And the Saudis, the Jew Saudis....what can one say about them?























Arab countries silently obediently queuing to be slaughtered by Western Colonial forces, one by one.

_____________________________

U.S. And NATO Funded Libyan Rebels Free Al Qaeda Prisoners As Americans Continue To Lose Freedoms Over Same ‘Terrorists’

The Intel Hub

CNN has reported that hundreds of supporters of Al Qaeda have been freed by U.S. and NATO funded Libyan Rebels.

Up to 600 prisoners that were released are believed to be pro Al Qaeda militants.

As The Intel Hub and many others in the alternative media have reported for months, the Libyan Rebels are actually Al Qaeda connected war criminals funded and run with the help of the CIA.

In fact, on August 22nd, former U.S. asset in Libya Susan Lindauer destroyed the NATO and corporate media lies in a 2 hour transmission on The Bob Tuskin Radio Show.

While Americans continue to lose more and more freedoms all in the name of protecting us from Al Qaeda, the CIA and NATO have openly funded our supposed enemies who in turn have released 600 Al Qaeda prisoners and are Al Qaeda sympathizers themselves.

This was the plan from the beginning. Pretend the war in Libya is for humanitarian issues, bomb the hell out of the civilian population in the name of freedom, and then fear monger over Al Qaeda taking over in Libya!

Libya

.
.
.
.
An interesting blog post in an otherwise staunchly pro-American newspaper, providing extensive statistics about Gaddafi's regime:

__________________________

Libya: A Revolution for Democracy or an Oil War?

V Raghunathan at Times of India Blogs.

Living in a country where there is enough to be outraged about every minute of the day, it is not very often that one takes time off to be outraged about something happening in another continent. But then there are times, one cannot simply live in one’s own cocoon, even if the cocoon happens to be a sub-continent sized country at war with corruption.

It started with an e-forward (and we all receive our share) from a good friend. It contained an article titled ‘The Truth About Libya’ by Stephen Goodson, who is presumably the same Goodson who sits on the board of the Central Bank of South Africa; and unseated mining honcho, Brian Gilbertson, from the Bank's Board" in 2003 and was the leader of leader of Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party, a political party registered with South African with the Electoral Commission.

The article itself said this:

------------
"Colonel Muammar Gadaffi is frequently referred to in the media as a "mad dictator" and "bloody tyrant", but do these allegations accord with the facts?

Libya consists of over 15O tribes, with the two main groups, the Meghabra living in Tripolitania in the west and the Wafallah living in Cyrenaica in the east. Previous attempts to unite these tribes by the Turkish (1855-1911) and ltalian {1911-43) colonial rulers failed and the country was split in two for administrative purposes.

Oil was discovered in Libya in 1959, but King ldris of the Senussi tribe allowed most of the oil profits to be siphoned into the coffers of the oil companies. The coup d'etat on 1 September 1969 led by Colonel Gadaffi had countrywide support. He subsequently married a woman from the royal Barqa tribe and adroitly unified the nation.

By retaining Libya's oil wealth for the benefit of all its people, Gadaffi had created a socialist paradise. There is no unemployment, Libya has the highest GDP in .Africa, less than 5% of the population is classified as poor and it has fewer people living below the poverty datum line than for example in Holland. Life expectancy is 75 years and is the highest in Africa and I0% above the world average.

With the exception of the nomadic Bedouin and Tuareg tribes, most Libyan families possess a house and a car. There is free health care and education and not surprisingly Libya has a literacy rate of 82%. Last year Gadaffi distributed $500 to each man, woman and child (population 6.5 million).

Libya has a tolerable human rights record and stands at 61 on the International Incarceration Index, comparable with countries in central Europe (the lower the rating, the lower the standing - the USA occupies the no.1 spot!). There is hardly any crime and only rebels and traitors are dealt with harshly.

Anyone who has read Gadaffi's little Green Book will realize that he is a thoughtful and enlightened leader. Libya has been accused of having committed numerous acts of terrorism in the past, but many of these have been perpetrated by foreign intelligence agencies as false flag operations - the Lockerbie bombing being a prime example.

The CIA and MI6 and their frontmen have been stoking up dissent in the east of the country for almost 30 years. Libya produces exceptionally high quality light crude oil and its production cost of $1 a barrel, compared to the current price of $115, is the lowest in the world.

Riba (usury) is not permitted. The Central bank of Libya is a wholly-owned by the Libyan Government and is run as a state bank, issuing all government loans free of interest. This is in contrast to the exploitative fractional reserve banking system of the West. The no-fly zone and the bombing of Libya have nothing to do with the protection of civilians. It is an act of war a blatant and crude attempt by the oil corporations and international bankers to steal the wealth of Libya."

---------

Now, Gadaffi is not among my favorite leaders, to put it mildly. Not by a long shot. There is plenty that’s wrong with the boorish man. He is a ruthless and cruel dictator; a loose cannon; and of questionable balance of mind, even if I envy him his beautiful body-guards. But that’s not the only criteria upon which you judge the state of a nation. So, notwithstanding Goodson’s credibility, I did some double check of some facts about Libya.

I found that Libya, as recently as 2010, ranks No. 55 out of 172 countries in the world in the Human Development Index of UNDP, with a score of 0.755 (0.749 in 2009), and counts among the countries with High Development Indices, comparable to some of the European countries. Libya has the highest HDI in Africa and is way ahead of India at 0.519 (ranked 122), for example.

According to UNDP "the Human Development Index or HDI (developed in 1990 by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul Haq and Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen) is a comparative measure of life expectancy, literacy, education and standards of living for countries worldwide. It is a standard means of measuring well-being, especially child welfare."

How about the Human Rights record of Libya? Well, in general, high development index is supposed to be highly correlated with Low incidence of human rights violations. So not surprisingly, Guardian, based on Amnesty International reports, does not feature Libya in the list of 20 worst offenders in the world.

Also, according to UNDP, Libya’s literacy (subsumed in HDI as well) in 2009 was 86.8%, way ahead of India, leave alone Pakistan or Bangladesh. Yes, corruption in Libya has been high. However, according to Transparency International, from 2005 until 2009, it corruption in Libya was no higher than corruption in Philippines, Pakistan, Belarus, Bangladesh, Indonesia or Nepal. And yet, for some surprising reason, in 2010, all these countries have suddenly become less corrupt than Libya! Now usually, corruption levels in countries do not change drastically overnight. What could then explain the overnight drop in the corruption rating, after having been ahead of these countries for five years before suddenly losing their rating? Could the 2010 ranking of Libya be somewhat stilted, thanks to some hanky-panky by the Western Powers?

By these parameters, it would seem that the dictatorship in Libya has not been as bad as it has been painted out to be. In virtually every conceivable dimension, Libya’s track record has been well above most Asian countries, leave alone African. And if there has been a rebellion or a revolution in Libya, it is easy to see how it may well have been the result of much aid and abetting by the US under the convenient excuse of the wave of democratic movement in other parts of Africa and West Asia. If it was the dictatorship that moved the US to support the Libyan movement, one wonders why a Burma never benefited from this democratic concern of the US.

But then Burma is poor country. Not oil rich like Iraq and Libya are. Gadaffi may well have been a notorious dictator just as Saddam was. But one wonders if the rebels ‘win’ would truly help the people of the country or open up a long sequence of disquiet amidst a host of disparate groups warring with each other, as in Iraq. But yes, the oil-hungry US with a plummeting economy may well be a beneficiary of the Libyan movement – way more than the Libyan people.

I cannot but agree with Goodson. And one can’t agree with him without being outraged as a citizen of the world.

Libya

.
.
.
.

The price of Nato help

The brutal 42-year-old dictatorship of Muammar al-Qadhafi is close to collapse and his own whereabouts are unknown. But the confusion over the Libyan situation cannot obscure the problems caused by the military intervention of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato). Heavy fighting continues in and around the capital, Tripoli, with Nato giving heavy bombing and shelling support to the rebel body, the Transitional National Council (TNC); and atrocities by both sides have been reported. This is, in large part, the outcome of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 — which bars landings by foreign forces but allows member states to use “all necessary means” (diplomatic terminology for military action) to ensure Libyan compliance with the Resolution. Humanitarian intervention as conceived by the United States, the United Kingdom, and France under cover of the U.N. has meant using highly advanced weaponry in helping the TNC, which includes militant Islamists of the sort who have been fighting Nato and other western forces in Iraq and Afghanistan for a decade, to bring about violent regime change. This western commitment to regime change, which could not have been achieved without Nato bombing, amounts to a total U-turn from the time, barely a year ago, when the same leaders were making much of Mr. Qadhafi in order to win access to Libya’s substantial oilfields.

The entire rebellion and the Nato campaign are riddled with inconsistencies. Western proponents initially claimed the campaign would be over in days. It has lasted six months, is yet to end, and has cost the U.S. alone more than a billion dollars. Secondly, there are severe tensions among the TNC’s three main factions; it is still not known who murdered the rebels’ top officer, General Abdel Fattah Younes. Furthermore, many leaders among Libya’s 140 tribes, including longstanding Qadhafi supporters, will want office in the new order. Above all, the western powers will almost certainly exact a heavy price for supporting the uprising. Their demands are likely to include — as they did in Iraq — preferential, if not monopoly, access for western oil corporations. It is no coincidence that as reports emerged of the rebel advance on Tripoli, the price of Brent Crude fell 1.7 per cent to $106.8 per barrel in futures trading. There are also likely to be lucrative contracts for western companies to rebuild Libyan cities; and the European Union members of Nato may want the new government to impose tight controls on Libyan migration to the EU.

In effect, the U.S., Britain, and France, with help from Italy, have used the U.N. and Nato to bring about regime change and pull off a gigantic oil-grab.

Destabilisation and invasion of Third World countries using Islamists.

.
.
.
.
I suppose history does repeat itself, and that a lot of people don't learn from it.

The USA is a dangerous globalist power since 1945, with 800 military bases around the world, and a security budget of $1500 billion unofficially, and run by Jews.

The "Project for a New American Century" (2000) policy paper states that this hyper-power should seek MORE POWER around the world.....in fact "Full Spectrum Control", so that the USA is eventually recognized as the ultimate empire, which will never be challenged by any new power....whether its China or Russia.

Obviously to meet such an unrealistic ambition a lot of fighting has to done before it is achieved. There are many nations who don't want to be ruled, or dominated by the USA after all (The land of the free and brave).

As these wars for the PNAC empire increases, so will the resistance against it within the USA itself and the rest of the world, never mind the clever attempts at camouflaging ultimate American culpability, by getting various Western countries and NATO involved in such imperialist ambitions.

But lets face it without American involvement there would be no American invasion and occupation of Afghanistan for 10 years now as the lead country....or Iraq for 8 years now with the USA as the lead country which wants to stay far longer well after the welcome has clearly ended....or Somalia since 2006...or Libya now.

Then the European little poodles who take queue and encouragement from the USA will no longer be involved in these foreign misadventures, which benefits nobody except the exclusive Jewish International bankers and a few within the elite.

What is the cost of these Jewish Imperialist Wars........a few trillion $ for the USA, and counting, and 100,000 dead unofficially.....with another 500,000 ex-military on the streets. For the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan at least 1000 unofficially dead soldiers....with another 15,000 on the streets ......and $30 billion cost to the exchequer who is so desperate that they are holding fire sales of MOD equipment at rock bottom prices.

Who benefits from all this? Not the majority of people in the USA, UK or any where else.

But nor will REASON/RATIONALE bring an end to these wars for the Jews.

What will bring an end to these wars is when victim nations in the Third World learn from the historical lessons of American aggression and are able to fight harder and better against this racist, greedy, imperialist, evil.

What will bring an end to these wars is when the American war costs become too exorbitant, and the economy is no longer in a position to sustain this "war economy" forever.

What will bring an end to these imperial wars is when China takes a more pro-active stand in the global stage, and asserts without shame its role as the banker and debt holder of the USA economy.

The USA put simply is waging global war, using China's, Japan and South Korea's money. These three countries, two of them military colonies of the USA, have relented so far.....but for how long?......"Give us money or else Comrade Kim will attack you with missiles?"

A simple observation of the so called "Arab Spring" "Peoples power" which has been funded by the State Department as a clever destabilization program looks spookily like the coup against the democratically and may I say popularly elected Mossadeq government of Iran in 1953, or "Operation Ajax" involving faggotty Spooks, rent a crowds, mullahs on the pay of CIA/MI6 and greasy local military men who liked the $, and the possibility of power....working through the American embassy.

________________________

INVASION OF NORTH AFRICA by aangirfan

The CIA, with MOSSAD and NATO, began the Arab Spring with their coup in Tunisia, a peaceful, prosperous and moderate Moslem country.

1. On 17 December 2010, a false flag operation apparently took place in in the Tunisian city of Sidi Bouzid. The family of a street vendor called Mohamed Bouazizi became very rich.

2. Various CIA mercenaries and NATO special forces reportedly stirred things up by killing a lot of Tunisians. (False flag ops)

3. Some treacherous Tunisian dogs, 'coached by Soros NGOs', joined the revolt. (rent a crowds which were also used against the Mossadeq government in Iran in 1953)

4. And Tunisian generals, 'working for the CIA', forced out Ben Ali.




(Basic outline of the revolts in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Syria, directed by the JEWSA)

On 24 August 2011, we learn that Tunisia's economy "has suffered increasingly this summer".

Tunisian voters do not believe that the CIA-MOSSAD-NATO will give up its grip on Tunisia.

Less than 15% of Tunisia's eligible voters have registered to vote in the election due in October 2011.

Tunisia's Revolution Struggles‎

According to a new poll, by the Applied Social Sciences Forum, optimism amongst Tunisians fell from 32% in April 2011 to 24% in August 2011.

The town of Sidi Bouzid, the birthplace of the uprising, recorded the highest levels of distrust in the progress of Tunisia’s revolution at 62.1%.

Arab Spring Slips Into Tunisian Fall




















The CIA's Arab Spring hit Egypt, which under Mubarak was becoming more prosperous.

In August 2011, European Union Ambassador Marc Franco expressed concern over the Egyptian economy, which he said is in an 'alarming' state.

He praised the former regime of Mubarak for liberalizing the economy and encouraging investment.

Egyptian economy in 'alarming' state, says EU ambassador

On 9 August 2011, Egyptian stocks plunged to their lowest in more than two years as international investors withdrew money.

Egyptian Stocks Fall to Lowest in Two Years on Economic Concern‎


Now Libya is being wrecked.

In Tripoli, there is no water and no electricity.

"NATO's mandate ends in September and without a victory, real or imagined, Libya will become a tactical and political defeat." (Battle for Tripoli & Greater Libya Still On)

























Qaddafi’s Leadership Structure is Intact; NATO’s al Qaeda Infantry a Contemptible Rabble; Get Set for a Long War

Obama's speech in the days to come.

.
.
.
.
There was a long protracted Colonial struggle around the world for liberation against Western Colonialism, during the 1950's and 1960's.

European colonialism had claimed the lives of between 50--70 million people, in Central & South America, Africa and of course Asia. (1500---1970).

The struggle against Western Colonialism was not all peaceful, but involved the SACRIFICES OF MILLIONS of innocent Third World poor people. In Vietnam, in SE Asia, in the Middle East, and of course in Africa post 1945.

The USA adopted an anti-colonial position officially at least against former European powers, after 1945. It after all liberated itself from a Western colonial power.

The Soviet Union adopted an anti-colonial position too, and supported various peoples liberation groups around the world through armed support.

With the diplomatic support of the USA, and the material support of the Soviet Union, European colonialism quickly came to an end.........but not without a fight.

In 1991 the Soviet Union came to an end, as did its anti-Colonial position.

Boris Yeltsin was a drunk front of the Jewish Oligarchical rulers who looted Russia into a virtual Third World country, taking directions and orders from the Rothschilds of London.(1991--1999) Celtic Medvedev, and Slavic Putin both from St. Petersburg which is a city which looks to the West with a longing sigh and yearning, have since been elected and chosen by the Rothschilds of London through the Jewish secret government within Moscow/London, but have been a little bit more "effective" in running Russia, attempting to move closer to the West, JUST AS the West led by the USA has been under mining the country through various fronts. The Rothschild puppets Medvedev, and Judo KGB "man of action" Putin have after the benefit of reflection and 12 years have not been effective in countering the policies of the USA, as it attempts to surround Russia, and there after China.

The Russian leaders support of nations struggling against Western neo-colonialism has thus been very weak, even where Russia's national interests clearly stated otherwise. In fact especially with Celtic Medvedev, who is believed to be Jewish, has shambolically joined in the policies of the West.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Jews in the USA spun a new story that now the time had arrived for the USA to become a lone superpower which would be the greatest empire on earth, unchallenged. This was enunciated in a significant state document known as the "Project for a New American Century" (2000).......a basic wikipedia reading of the policy paper penned by extremist right-wing Jews from Israel and the USA, should tell us what USA foreign policy is really about, both Democratic and Republican.

The Jewish power and control of the USA has meant that this extremist policy paper has been adopted by both political parties, "African" Obama being more enthusiastic. Former colonial European powers have joined in.....but the lead comes from the USA, which itself is led by Likud Israel.

As a result of this in the space of 10 years, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and Libya have all been invaded and occupied by foreign alien powers. Aggression is practiced against Iran, Syria Pakistan....and destabilization of Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen.

There are those who console themselves that this surely affects ONLY Middle East countries. I would say that American led intervention, using "Bay of Pigs" type mercenaries, along with Western covert help sets a DANGEROUS precedence AGAINST ALL THIRD WORLD nations, eventually. It is a bad habit that persists. It is driven by greed and unchecked ambition of a few men.

Thus ALL Third World nations must guard against the ambitions of Washington and specifically the State Department........and the Western poodles of Washington who are nostalgic about the grand old days of European colonialism. And the hope that China strategically and militarily can provide a counter-balance to the power of the West for those nations seeking genuine refuge against Western colonialism.

I don't have a magic formula for fighting Western colonialism........except for doing the common sense things.

_______________________

OBAMA ON LIBYA by aangirfan

Here is the speech we have written for President Obama when he explains why troops have to go into Libya:

"My fellow Americans, Libya is in chaos and there are clear indications that the 'rebels' are not in a position to restore order.

We must copy the Italians. In October 1911, our Italian allies brought order to Libya. In just one incident, the Al-Shutt massacre, our Italian friends, with great efficiency, wiped out over a thousand troublesome women and children. (Tripoli Post)

We may need to build concentration camps in Libya. I will remind you that in 1930, the Italians had to move the population of Gebel, 100,000 people, to concentration camps.

Let us be in no doubt that the Libyans are troublesome people. Italy had to kill 12,000 Libyans every year in order to keep order. (Arab, Semitic, Third World, Muslim......through vicious propaganda such people are hated figures in the West, except when their leaders loot their country and deposit their wealth in Western banks)

I will remind you that back in 1885, it was decided, at a conference in Berlin, that Belgian troops were to be sent into the Congo. (massacres in Africa) Although, sadly, half the population of the Congo died as a result of this intervention, there was a huge advantage for Belgium. I will be honest. We need to do to Libya what the Belgians did to the Congo.




When it comes to looking after our interests we should not be squeamish. I will remind you that on 2 September 1889, our British friends killed 11,000 Sudanese in one day - all in a good cause. (massacres in Africa)

In 1904, our German allies brought peace to Namibia by killing 80% 0f the population.

In 1920 and 1921, the British brought order to Iraq by killing 10,000 Iraqis.

Let us not forget our allies in France. In 1945, French troops had to kill 50,000 Algerians in order to keep order.

(Maybe 1.5 million Algerians died between 1945--1962 for the liberation war)

(More here: NATO powers have long history of massacres in Africa)