According to this article in Judicial-Inc.biz it is the Israelis who carried out the false flag op of the Marriot hotel in Islamabad.
How is that possible? How can Israel have access to such a sensitive part of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan? Not too far away from the Supreme Court and Parliament.
The Israelis have targeted Pakistan for quite a while.
1. Of the que from the first Israeli PM David Ben-Gurion that Islamic Pakistan, founded on Islam presented a threat to Israel. Through 'Crisis management' Israel will conduct her foreign policy around the world........false flag ops........Lavon Affair, King David Hotel, USS Liberty, the attack against American ambassador John Gunther Dean, a Jew, in Lebanon in 1982............so on.
2. When Pakistan in the 1970's proclaimed loudly to the world that Pakistanis would even eat grass if that was the sacrifice needed to produce an 'Islamic bomb' 1974. PM Zulifikar Ali Bhutto speech. Israel's ears were pricked. Henry Kissinger was dispatched to Islamabad immediately to make vague threats...........
3. The Coup of 1977 in Pakistan, engineered by the Americans for Israel, and the execution of Bhutto in 1979.
4. Requests to India to conduct joint aerial attacks against Pakistan's nuclear facilities in the 1980's with the Israeli IAF. India declined.
5. The Israelis developing closer links with RAW in the eighties.......they are very close now.
6. Developing closer links with the Pakistani ISI in the 1980's, via the Americans and possibly Turkey. By the mid 1980's the MOSSAD were in Pakistani soil training the Afghan Mujaheddin, and generally controlling the huge arms flow to the mujaheddin with their ISI contacts. The fact that Israel was planning to attack Pakistan's nuclear facilities in joint operations with India at the same time, was something Pakistan's ISI were blissfully unaware.
7. The killing of the entire top brass of the Pakistan military in 1988, either by MOSSAD, or through American assistance.
8. The creation of the al-Qaeda myth, and the Taliban through the ISI in the 1990's, to create a causus belli to attack Muslim countries including Pakistan in the future. On the 'surface' the Clinton administration explained to 'liberal western educated' Benazir in 1994 that supporting the weird extremist Taliban would be in Pakistan's best interest, strategic depth and all that American based Bull Shit, and Benazir said Thank you sahib you are sooo kind and helpful.
9. The creation of a narcotics business worth tens of billions of $ from Afghanistan, into Pakistani based refineries, and then the heroin exported through Karachi to Europe especially, and a little bit to America------MOSSAD/ISI business...............and another avenue through which MOSSAD has infiltrated Pakistan.
10. If we observe 9/11 which was essentially an Israeli operation, but we also note the prominent role Pakistan played at various levels..............The ISI, at least on the surface.
11. If we observe Israel and nuclear bomb programs viz Iran, a nation which doesn't have a nuclear bomb and doesn't seem to be too interested either, we can observe how paranoiac and pathological the Jew can be against a nation which doesn't even have nuclear bombs....so translate the Jew feelings towards Pakistan's nuclear bombs which do exist, along the Iran parameters.
12. The Jew is a curiosity to me.............maybe I am not smart enough to understand them....we find through the revelations of Sibel Edmonds that Israel, with their agents in America operated a vast nuclear arms and industry black market, with linkages to Pakistan AQ Khan etc.....another linkage between MOSSAD and ISI.
13. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto, may be an ISI/MOSSAD work, to put Musharaf on the defensive, and make him irrelevant, and remove him from power. Although Musharaf had developed friendly relations with the Israelis shaking hands with Sharon in 2005 at the sidelines of the UN, and later Ehud Barak the Israeli defence minister, giving clappy happy interviews in the Jewish media in America.........he never the less may have been perceived as an obstacle for Israel, in his way of exercising a firm security grip over the country of Pakistan, and presenting a form of stability and progress.......whereas the Israelis want a narrative of Pakistan as a nation which is a failed state which can't be trusted with its nuke bombs and America had better secure them before they fall into the wrong hands. Zardari their gangster puppet can now oblige them with that narrative.
14. If Israel wants to attack Iran perhaps with bunker busters nukes, obviously they have to factor in Pakistan's response if the conflict escalates into a wider regional war......and hence the need to get at those nukes.
15. So these are the combination's of means and motives by Israel against Pakistan and they are pretty strong over a very long period of time. From the above FACTS
(except 13 and 14) we can deduce that the ISI does not necessarily work in the best interests of Pakistan, but does what ever it thinks is profitable for their members.....in essence a criminal rogue enterprise that does not serve Pakistan's interests. The ISI would be a prime candidate for the Marriot Hotel bombing...with the MOSSAD. The ISI together with MOSSAD would be a prime candidate for the attacks against various military installation of late in Pakistan, and the attacks against military personnel.
I'll get to the reasons for the attack later.......first are there any other candidates?
________________________________________
Some say that it was the ISI again with British intelligence.
How is that possible?
1. The British ruled this part of the world from 1830---1947. During that time they developed a lot of local linkages for intelligence purposes. The British Raj also had an intelligence service directed from Delhi by British officers. An awful lot of the local intelligence operatives were Muslims from the Punjab and NWFP in the British Raj intelligence service actively involved in the Great Game against Czarist Russia or in British operations against the Ottoman empire, Persia and the Gulf, where being Muslim would be an asset, besides knowing the local tongue ( a prerequisite for an intelligence officer)............so a close relationship over a long period of time developed between the two.
2. Britain assisted in the creation of the Muslim league in 1905 to counter the growing power of the Congress party, and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in the 1920's..........the spiritual father of al-Qaeda the nonexistent organization, from where the number two comes from. Britain by creating and assisting the Muslim League during WW II, de facto created the state of Pakistan, to clip India's wings.
3. Britain helped create Pakistan's ISI in 1948.
4. According to Peter Goodgame Britain's intelligence services exercise primarily control over the ISI, still, because of the historical linkages. An extract from his book is posted here:
Afghanistan, Pakistan, the ISI and the BCCI
By Peter Goodgame from his book,
The Globalists and the Islamists: Formenting a clash of civilisation for new world order.
On July 3, 1979, at the insistence of advisors such as Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter signed a directive authorizing covert aid to the fundamentalist opponents of the ruling communist regime in Afghanistan (1). This move was understood as one that would likely lead to direct Soviet intervention and that is exactly what happened on December 24 of that year when, after being invited by the Afghani government, the Russian military took up positions to protect government assets from rebel attacks.
From the beginning of the Afghan War the CIA partnered with Pakistani Intelligence (ISI) and funded the rebel mujahedin fighters. Today it is generally understood that radical Islam received its biggest boost as a result of the mujahedin's successful jihad against Soviet forces, and when the Soviets retreated from Afghan territory in early 1989 the country was left with tens of thousands of unemployed Islamic mercenaries who then turned their attention to the West.
The history of Afghanistan has always been closely connected with Pakistan, a region formerly colonized by Britain. British involvement in the subcontinent goes back as far as the early years of the seventeenth century when British East India Company merchants were allowed to establish trading posts by the the Emperor Jahangir of the Islamic Mughal Empire. Direct British rule in India is generally seen as beginning in 1757 when BEIC forces led by Robert Clive defeated the army of the Nawab of Bengal at the Battle of Plessey. In 1803 British control over the subcontinent increased even further when the rulers of the Mughal Empire became pensioners of the BEIC. The Indus River Valley, the center of modern Pakistan, was brought under British control through the successful campaign of 1848-1849 that conquered the Sikh empire, giving the British the Punjab. Since then the regions that are today India and Pakistan were ruled by Britain continuously until the British Empire withdrew and created the two nations in 1947.
When Britain withdrew a number of British officers remained behind to help shepherd (and control) the emerging Pakistani Army. One of these was Major General Walter Joseph Cawthorn who, as Deputy Chief of Staff of the Pakistani Army established Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in 1948. Cawthorn was an Australian-born British Intelligence (MI-6) agent who had directed operations in the Middle East, Indian, and Southeast Asian bureaus from 1939-1945. He became Sir Cawthorn in 1958 when he was knighted by the British Crown, and later he served in Australia as head of their Secret Intelligence Service (2). Pakistan's ISI was originally a military intelligence agency created to help defend Pakistan in the early wars against India over Kashmir and other border issues, but over the years it has grown to become Pakistan's version of the CIA, and it has continually maintained close ties with British Intelligence.
The power of the ISI increased for its first twenty years until the emergence of Pakistan's first popularly elected civilian leader, the socialist Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in 1971. Bhutto immediately displayed the same nationalistic characteristics as Nasser, Mossadegh and the Shah and his regime fell out of favor with the British government and the West. In 1972 Bhutto withdrew his country from the British Commonwealth of Nations and he pursued closer relations with Russia, China and the Arab states.
In 1977 the inevitable coup took place, and President Bhutto was overthrown by General Zia Ul-Haq, who had been appointed to Chief of the Army Staff by Bhutto in 1976 at the insistence of Gulam Jilani Khan, the longstanding Director General of the ISI. Bhutto comments at great length on his constant struggles with, and betrayal by, the ISI in his book If I Am Assassinated, penned from his Pakistani prison cell. He also relates how Kissinger threatened him for pushing forward on Pakistan's nuclear power program, telling him, "We will make an example of you!" He was. Bhutto was executed in 1978 after being subjected to a sham trial, despite the objections of heads of state from around the globe. (3)
A radical spokesman of the Muslim Brotherhood had this to say several years later, "The Brotherhood has taken over in Iran and Pakistan. Bhutto stood for intrusion of the West into Islam. Bhutto was everything that Pakistan was not. That is why we killed him. And we will use his death as a warning to others." (3a)
Britain's relation with the Pakistan underworld becomes clear with a look back at the BCCI scandal. The Bank of Credit and Commerce International was the first Third World multinational bank, created in 1972 by Pakistani banker Agha Hasan Abedi. It was initially funded by Sheik Zayed of Abu Dhabi, and from a $2.5 million operation it grew to be worth $23 billion when it was finally shut down in 1991. It was created just in time to take advantage of the river of cash that was flowing into the Middle East through the oil industry.
One of BCCI's early moves to gain international influence was its purchase in 1976 of 85% of the Banque de Commerce et Placements (BCP) of Geneva, Switzerland. After the BCCI took over this bank it installed Alfred Hartmann as manager. Hartmann then became the chief financial officer for BCC Holding and thus one of BCCI's most influential directors. Hartmann was a member of the British banking establishment through his connections with the Rothschild family, being a member of the board of directors of N.M. Rothschild and Sons, London, and president of Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich. (4)
BCCI was initially incorporated in Luxembourg, famous for its lax banking restrictions, and soon branches and holding companies sprouted up around the globe: in the Cayman Islands, the Netherlands Antilles, Hong Kong, Abu Dhabi, Washington DC and just about everywhere else. However, by 1980, when the BCCI finally applied for and received a license from the Bank of England, there were already more branches in the UK than in any other nation. In fact, one of BCCI's primary economics advisors was the former British Prime Minister (1976-79) Lord James Callaghan (5). The BCCI may have been created by a Pakistani, but in the end it was a British-based and British-controlled bank.
Over the years the BCCI became involved in just about every type of illicit transaction that a bank could be involved in including drug money laundering, weapons dealing, bribery, fraud, etc. It was used extensively by the CIA throughout its history, it played a part in the Iran-Contra scandal, it was a bank used by the Medellin Colombian cocaine cartel, and a branch was even set up in Panama for the cash that Manuel Noriega was funneling out of his country. After BCCI was shut down the UK's The Guardian newspaper reported that the terrorist Abu Nidal had maintained BCCI accounts. Jonathan Beaty and S.C. Gwynne, the Time reporters who covered the scandal write,
"According to The Guardian's sources, the Nidal group had long used a London branch of BCCI to move the money it used to mount attacks on Western targets, and MI5 -- the English equivalent of the CIA -- had known about the accounts. There seemed to be no doubt that the BCCI bankers knew exactly who they were dealing with: One of the bankers at the London branch described how anxious they had been to provide every service to the terrorists in order to keep their multibillion-dollar accounts." (6)
However, the main purpose of the BCCI, and the reason behind its meteoric rise, was its connection to the ISI and the mujahedin fighting the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. After Zia replaced Bhutto as Pakistan's president he appointed his friend Fazle Haq to be the governor of Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province in 1978. This is the area that borders Afghanistan through which tons of drugs and weapons were smuggled over the Khyber Pass. Fazle Haq was an important friend and backer of BCCI's founder Abedi, and the BCCI was used to launder untold millions of ISI narcotics revenues (7).
Coincidentally, in 1983 the British-based World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) suggested that two national parks be created in Pakistan's northwest, and although rather thin in natural wildlife the preserves proved to be excellent for poppy growing and for staging mujahedin incursions into Afghanistan. (8)
Former Senate investigator Jack Blum said this about the BCCI's connection to the Afghan war during his testimony to the U.S. Congress,
"This bank was a product of the Afghan War and people very close to the mujahideen have said that many Pakistani military officials who were deeply involved in assisting and supporting the Afghan rebel movement were stealing our foreign assistance money and using BCCI to hide the money they stole; to market American weapons that were to be delivered that they stole; and to market and manage funds that came from the selling of heroin that was apparently engineered by one of the mujahideen groups." (9)
When General Zia took over Pakistan all of the pieces were in place to begin the massive drug running, fraud and swindling operation that was the Afghan War. According to Beaty and Gwynne, Zia already had a "close and cooperative relationship" with BCCI founder Agha Hasan Abedi when he took power (10). The triangle of General Zia's government, the ISI (who had empowered Zia) and the BCCI then proceeded to run the Afghan mujahedin uprising for the CIA, with input from above from British Intelligence. Over the course of the Afghan war up to $5 billion of American taxpayer aid was funneled into the war effort, and through the duration Pakistan's ISI trained about 83,000 Muslim mujahedin fighters.
Britain's role in promoting the Afghan experiment was crucial, although now it is often overlooked. Almost immediately after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan Lord Nicholas Bethell, a career British Intelligence agent, formed Radio Free Kabul as a voice for the mujahedin. Bethell had been involved with Russian and Mid-East operations his entire career, and he was a close friend of British spy Kim Philby. Other members of Radio Free Kabul included Winston Churchill III, former Foreign Secretary Baron Chalfont, Lord Morrison of Lambeth the former head of the Foreign Office, and British Intelligence official Ray Whitney. In 1981 Lord Bethell accompanied Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher on a tour of the U.S. to drum up support for the resistance, and together they met with over 60 congressmen and senators, eventually leading to the creation of the US-based Committee for a Free Afghanistan which continually lobbied in support of the mujahedin. (11)
Another British creation was Afghan Aid UK, first set up in Peshawar, Pakistan by the wife of British journalist John Fullerton. This group's primary sponsor was Britain's Viscount Cranbourne, who later testified before the U.S. Congress Special Joint Task Force on Afghanistan to lobby for US support. His organization was granted substantial funding by the British government and by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). (11)
Britain lobbied to create a war in Afghanistan, they wanted American taxpayers to pay for it, and they manipulated the financial situation so that they might profit from it. The BCCI was shut down by the Bank of England in 1991 only after the Russian withdrawal, and only then because of the courageous campaigning of a handful of American investigators. Beaty and Gwynne write,
"Though the Bank of England had pulled the trigger on BCCI on July 5, 1991, and had thereby started a global chain reaction that had smashed Agha Hasan Abedi's brainchild into tiny pieces, it had done so only reluctantly and only after waiting an extraordinary amount of time. It had been cowardly rather than heroic; it had moved only when forced to do so by a formidable U.S. alliance between the Federal Reserve Bank and the Manhattan district attorney." (12)
The final U.S. congressional report on the BCCI affair states,
"By agreement, the Bank of England had in effect entered into a plan with BCCI, Abu Dhabi and Price Waterhouse in which they would keep the true state of affairs at BCCI secret in return for cooperation with one another in trying to avoid a catastrophic multibillion-dollar collapse. From April 1990 forward, the Bank of England had now inadvertently become partner to a cover-up of BCCI's criminality." (13)
BCCI was the favored bank for Middle Eastern terrorists and arms and drug runners, South American drug cartels, organized crime lords, and even for intelligence services such as the ISI, Mossad, MI6 and the CIA. In fact then-CIA assistant director Robert Gates once referred to BCCI jokingly as the "Bank of Crooks and Criminals" (14). For at least a decade British authorities allowed it to run amuck out of their living room and after it's fall important records were sealed away and kept from American investigators. When the scandal broke the media backlash focused primarily on BCCI's American links and the CIA, but only because of the British establishment's secrecy and expertise in damage control. It's likely that the whole truth will never be known.
As the war in Afghanistan wound down and the Russian withdrawal became inevitable, the situation became much more complex. American support for the mujahedin dropped off as the CIA tried to resist the establishment of a fanatical Afghani government. New warlords emerged and other avenues of drug smuggling were increasingly utilized, through Iran and through the southern Soviet republics. The dwindling supply of U.S. Government money and arms, coupled with a decreasing supply of drug cash, helped along the BCCI decline.
This brings us to focus on the drug industry and the impact it has had in shaping Afghanistan. Peter Dale Scott, Alfred W. McCoy and Michael C. Ruppert are three authorities in this area. In brief, the conclusion reached by the experiences and research of these men is that drugs (most notably cocaine and heroin) are controlled commodities, just like oil, gold and diamonds, with intricate Western-supported systems of production, distribution and cash flow. Today the global drug industry generates about $600 Billion a year, and the vast majority of this cash is funneled (laundered) into Anglo-American banks and/or Wall Street. These researchers allege that one of the most important tasks of Western intelligence services has been to make sure that the flow of drug cash back into the Anglo-American financial system continues unimpeded. (And yes, the London-based BCCI was, for all intents and purposes, an Anglo-American bank.)
Whatever the case may be, it is worth pointing out that when Britain and the CIA became involved in Afghanistan the production of opium skyrocketed. From an estimated harvest of only 100 tons per year in the early seventies, opium production went up to 300 tons in 1982 and then to 575 tons in 1983. By the late eighties, near the end of the war, Afghani opium poppy production had reached an estimated 1600 tons per year. (15)
The CIA's drug racket was so successful that by 1981 Afghanistan supplied about 60% of America's heroin from contributing an almost negligible amount just two years previously. The crops were grown in Afghanistan, synthesized into heroin in labs on both sides of the Pak-Afghan border, and then smuggled into the US and Europe. General Zia's government was drowning in a sea of heroin as well, despite the international accolades he was receiving for simultaneously reducing the poppy crop on his side of the border, and Pakistan's heroin-addict population grew from about 5,000 in 1981 to over 1.2 million by 1985. (16)
It is also worth noting that the US-led war on the Taliban regime occurred after one of the most successful poppy-eradication programs ever seen. In July of 2000 Mullah Omar placed a ban on poppy growing and by February of 2001 UN drug control officials were able to confirm that poppy production had come to a virtual standstill in Taliban-controlled areas. Was the expected loss of drug-revenue an added incentive for the West to remove the Taliban? Does this explain why Afghan farmers have had little resistance in their quick return to their favorite cash crop after the Taliban's demise? (17)
When the CIA became involved in Afghanistan they were almost entirely dependent on their ISI contacts within Pakistan for intelligence and for guidance in directing the war effort. As the war evolved American support was channeled, at the behest of the ISI, to a group of seven independent Afghani mujahedin warlords who became known as the Peshawar Seven.
Eventually one of the seven, a warlord by the name of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, emerged as the primary recipient of American aid, despite his communist past, his radical view of Islam and his blatant anti-Americanism. Hekmatyar had been an engineering student at Kabul University, and then he had trained at the Kabul Military Academy before being kicked out. Hekmatyar became affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood in the early '70s, and by the time of the Afghan war he had emerged as the leader of a group called Hezb-i-Islami, or Party of Islam, even though he had never received a classical Islamic education. Over the years his followers became known for their strict Muslim fanaticism (they were notorious for throwing acid on the faces of women who refused to wear a veil), and Hekmatyar became Afghanistan's biggest opium producer. He possessed thousands of acres of poppy fields and, according to McCoy, he owned at least six heroin laboratories on the Pakistan side of the Khyber Pass. (18)
In March of 1990 the US House Republican Research Committee of the Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare submitted a 19-page report that criticized the CIA for its dealings with Hekmatyar's "Party of Islam" and for covering up the problems that his group had created. Over time it has emerged that Hekmatyar was an ISI asset who laundered his money through BCCI, and also cooperated with the Russian KGB to ensure his status as the most powerful warlord among many rivals.
Jeffrey Steinberg of EIR sums it up,
"Although American diplomats and intelligence officers posted in Pakistan often warned of Hekmatyar's strong anti-western and pro-Iranian views, speculated about possible Soviet KGB links, and even acknowledged his undisputed status as Afghanistan's "heroin king," his forces received the largest portion of American and other international military support throughout the Afghan War. Intelligence reports back to Washington about the progress of the war were notoriously biased, and filled with disinformation portraying Hekmatyar's mujahideen as the most successful fighters. Often the reports to the Pentagon and the CIA were identical to the reports prepared by British intelligence—complete with the same spelling and typographical errors. More reliable on-the-scene reports indicated that Hekmatyar spent more time and effort fighting rival mujahideen groups than battling the Soviets." (19)
The ISI's spin on the situation comes through in the book Afghanistan: The Bear Trap, in which Brigadier Mohammed Yousaf, the former head of the ISI's Afghan Bureau, (co-written with a former British Army officer), describes Hekmatyar as "scrupulously honest" and the toughest and most vigorous mujahedin leader. Yousaf was the ISI's director of the mujahedin and he argues that the war was drawn out longer than necessary because the United States did not give Hekmatyar and the Islamists enough support, which began to fade in the late '80s while the Soviets still occupied Afghanistan. Yousef resents the fact that the CIA did not give the Islamists an overwhelming victory, even though the Taliban eventually emerged after several years of civil war. (20)
Yousef's point of view can be compared to the 1990 US House Republican Report which is covered in this article by journalist Imran Akbar of The News International, which also details the suspected KGB links maintained by Hekmatyar.
After the Taliban took power Hekmatyar was forced to flee to Iran. In February of this year the Iranian government shut down his operations in Iran and expelled him back to Afghanistan. Hekmatyar has been as outspoken as ever in his anti-American views, offering reward money for the killing of American troops and calling the new US-installed Afghan government illegitimate. In May the CIA reportedly tried to assassinate him with a missile fired from an unmanned Predator drone as he and his entourage journeyed near Kabul. This ISI favorite remains one of the most dangerous players in Afghanistan today. (21)
In his book Yousef also goes to great lengths to make it clear that American personnel were never involved in training any of the Afghan mujahedin,
"Up to the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan in early 1989, no American or Chinese instructor was ever involved in giving training on any kind of weapon or equipment to the Mujahideen. Even with the heavier and more sophisticated weapons systems... it was always our Pakistani teams who trained the Mujahideen. This was a deliberate, carefully considered policy that we steadfastly refused to change despite mounting pressure from the CIA, and later from the US Defense Department, to allow them to take it over. From the start the Americans wanted to be directly involved with the distribution of the weapons, the operational planning of operations and the training of guerillas. From the start, until the last Soviet soldier quit the country, we successfully resisted." [emphasis added] (22)
Other than being financier and armament supplier, the American CIA was out of the loop. It was Yousef's ISI that ran the Afghan jihad against the Soviets, and it was the ISI that channeled CIA support to the most undesirable Afghan warlords. What becomes clear after reviewing the record of this era is that the ISI's agenda, and that of the Afghan War in general, was set to a far greater degree by the British than it was by the CIA. The British had formulated and promoted the plan for American involvement; they maintained close relations with the ISI that ran the war; they controlled the bank that largely benefited from it; and when the war was over they welcomed into Britain the many mujahedin veterans who applied for British asylum.
( bloggers note: The Islamic fundamentalists that killed the 270 intellectuals in Dhaka, Bangladesh on 13th December 1971 as a last farewell gesture by the Pakistanis towards their Muslim brethren in the East, were also granted asylum in the UK, including their leader Moinuddin Chaudhuri who until a tv expose, was running one of the largest mosques in the UK; invited to 10 Downing street and shook hands with the British PM, John Major, and Prince Charles but not clear if he was given the MBE/OBE. Obviously based on these facts above and the bloggers perception, the relationship of 'Pagal bacha' Islamic fundamentalists and the ISI, with the British as 'guiding light' pre-dates the ISI relationship with the 'Pagal bacha' under American encouragement from July 1979.)
Osama bin Laden was one of these veterans and in early 1994 he purchased an estate and lived for a short while in the London suburb of Wembley. During his time in London he established his Advice and Reformation Committee to oversee his economic network, and he solidified his propoganda links to the Western world through his connections with London's Sheikh Omar Bakri and with Abdel Bari Atwan, the editor of al-Quds al-Arabi, one of the most influential Arabic-language newspapers in the world. Yossef Bodansky, author of the best-selling biography of bin Laden writes that, "By the time bin Laden left London, he had consolidated a comprehensive system of entities with a solid -though clandestine- source of funding. This London-based data-dissemination system still works efficiently." (Written in 1999). (23)
_____________________________________________
5. According to author Salman Rushdie writing in essays in the early 1980's, there is still a deep nostalgia among the elite of Britain for the British Empire, that evil enterprise that killed 30 million Indians and stole upwards of $1 trillion worth of Indian assets. Very strangely membership of the British Commonwealth, which is a celebration of the British empire, has been increasing not decreasing as one might think............clearly someone is working hard to maintain the vestiges of the empire. There are 8,000 British troops in Afghanistan lurking in the country, and training former Taliban members.......The British ambassador in Kabul in the past has expressed a desire to turn Afghanistan into a defacto colony with the British presence there for 30-40 years....."Anyone for the Raj...Jolly good show what!" The profits from the Opium isn't harming them either.
So what would the motivations be of this attack against the hotel?
Well it looks like a combination of :
1. An expression of power by foreign entities....."We can attack you, so close to sensitive parts of your country, in your capital, near the Supreme Court, Parliament and Presidents residence.
2. An act of desperation, in that Pakistan might for once could be changing her security orientation significantly away from the West, and towards China more decisively, as a result of the problems in FATA and the occupation of Afghanistan by foreign forces.
3. As a Threat, to gain greater cooperation with the Jew policy of destabilizing Pakistan, and allowing foreign troops on Pakistani soil.
Against who in Pakistan is it directed?
Obviously not President Zardari, the gangster is their installed agent and doesn't require a lot of persuasion to sell his country to Israel. Some of his inner cabinet members are friends of Israel, and like closer links. Just give him a cut from the heroin trade, and throw in two more blond bimbo's and he's happy. He is clappy happy in New York having a ball just two days after such a serious incident in his country.........no emergencies, no nothing as if business as usual.
This operation was directed against the military and bureaucrats of Pakistan, in their city, to cooperate with the Jewish agenda for Pakistan; allow foreign troops on Pakistan soil, and help them destabilize Pakistan. Perhaps?
Will this threat work, if the above preposition was the intention?
Unlikely against the military men some of whom have seen action in actual combat.....so a bomb here and there is not going to phase them......quite toughened up men who are trained to face up to such things.
Likely outcome?
The military will sooner or later intervene again in Pakistan, as their mind becomes more concentrated on this factor. Zardari the gangster will only make matters worse necessitating and justifying a future military intervention.
We should see Pakistan moving further away from the USA, UK and towards greater reliance and cooperation with China. China given free access to Gwadar port, and we may see Chinese warships, and maybe even Russian warships docked there in the near future, whilst American bases are closed down.
Greater clashes between Pakistani and Coalition security forces, around FATA and Baluchistan.
______________________________________
Al-Qaeda does not exist, and obscure off shoots of al-Qaeda, never heard of before, do not exist either......this was a foreign operation with ISI assistance.......but certainly linked to the 7/7 attack against the Indian embassy in Kabul......and the attacks in Delhi more recently, and Ahmedabad in India.
Simple Pathan Hajji Khan baba doesn't come down from the FATA area into Islamabad on his own, into one of the heaviest guarded parts of Pakistan and set off a truck bomb, as the media in Pakistan keep focusing, this was a state sanctioned act by the ISI, with foreign encouragement, probably British.
The Truck bomb, given the pictures released, clearly shows that it could not have created a 40 by 60 foot Thermite explosive crater, obviously other military explosives must have been planted there well before the truck bomb arrived.
Clearly the truck bomb did not cause the fires in the 4th and 5th floors of the hotel; separate incendiary devices had to have been planted there days before.......so this was a big operation by the ISI, involving many, many people, with approval from the British, and very similar to the 7/7 Indian embassy bombing in its CRYPTIC MESSAGE way.
And one speculates on this blog, for that is what blogs are for........20/9, does that date have any cryptic significance..........to zero, you have nothing, nein...no...who plays these games? Fire on the Fourth floor.......for ..........Fifth floor.....5.......and what does the number five stand for in their games......who touts the number 5?........Kiyani was on a 5 day tour of China just 2 days later.......did he immediately make any statements about that incident? Kiyani was the head of the ISI, before becoming the head of the armed forces.
I have repeatedly stated that Pakistan should sign an FTA with India asap, and legalize the LOC.......I guess this is what one might call a snub (The 5 day visit of Kiyani to China). Listen untouchable, whilst the USA under Obama in 2009, UK, Israel WITH India can invade Pakistan, China will never commit significant troops to guarantee Pakistan's sovereignty.....they didn't in 1971, and they were silent in 1999, Kargil.....when Musharaf tried to scupper the last peace initiative between India and Pakistan.
Hotel=sanctuary=come to my country as a honored guest.Welcome.
Czech ambassador killed= Check; stop; block him....using 5.....cus I am shitting in my pants if he comes to Pakistan, and declares himself Shahenshah of Pakistan, and opens Zoroastrian temples...and ..and ...and. My Jew Masterji told me so, and I believe him 100%.
One Danish Diplomat killed= In the cryptic game from the UK, Denmark means "Go back to your country you Muslim bastard immigrant" i.e Mohammed cartoons, and the extreme right wing party in power in Denmark. The supreme irony that the Pakistanis should copy and follow that game without understanding its extreme right wing Euro-centric conotations....."Yaar bhai we in the ISI were only following sahib orders....we don't ask questions like that"
3 American servicemen killed= some in the Pakistani media are trying to convey the Americans as patsies........somehow involved in that act. The number 3 symbolizes petty small time crook and is a narrative pushed by certain sections of America, via Third countries..............so presumably this means that, the Americans are wrong in their assumptions, and number 5 reigns supreme......"Cus we said so, and heir Gobbels said repeat a lie enough times, then it becomes the truth"
ISI translation: "Don't come to my country you Aryan fucker.......cus my Bilaat/Jew master whispered to me that you will usurp my exclusive power in Pakistan, and put my untouchable relatives into concentration camps.....blah blah blah....(what ever takes your imagination).....so I am going to kill 53 people mainly from Pakistan, on an Islamic Holiday just to give you the hint not to come to my country."
Truck bombs don't immediately lead to fire in buildings, unless incendiary devices were planted there well before.....the patsy for this would seem to be the Americans who use the exclusive place for R&R. Why set the 4th and 5th floor ablaze? What British orgin cryptic message were the ISI trying to send out in this terrorist act?
Fire..........cryptically means the follower of Zoroastrianism, ancient religion of Persia. The fire engine means we will prevent the rise of Zorastrianism, because the religion is dangerous and racist. Such incidents work both as an warning to those who might aspire to follow Zoroastrianism, and as an alarm bell to those who are not its followers.
The FACTS........
1) There are about few hundred thousand followers of the Zoroastrian religion in the world, and with the exception of a few conversions in Iran, and Central Asia, the religion is highly unlikely to make a come back into the millions........
2) And unlike Nazism, it is not a racist religion....the tenets of the religion are not based on being Aryan exclusively, though only Aryans followed it.
But never let the FACTS get in the way of a "good story" and as a weapon to influence, alarm and coherce simple idiots into following your agenda.
I consider myself an Aryan, but do not speak a word of Farsi/Dari, do not practice the Zoroastrian religion, and have not in the last 42 years of my life created/joined any political party with the name, "Greater Aryan party".......in fact I have not joined ANY political party....to translate any racist ideas of say exterminating all the "untouchables" in the Punjab, one would need to join a political party, and then with the agenda and mass appeal get into power.......unlikely in Pakistan. The subject is most definitely not an aspiring Hitler......that puppet of the Jews.
But I would understand how the Jew with the British might use that to scare and manipulate Third parties who are ALREADY in power......"Look his coming to Pakistan.....he is going to take power away from you"....."He will exterminate you............and put the Swastikka on the Pakistani flag"........"He hates untouchables like you, be careful......"
The sheer stupidity of the propostion. But if you are in power in a Third World country, any far fetched idea from Ghora Sahibji might seem plausible enough for you get undue alarmed instead of checking the real facts.
If I were normal and objected to a persons position on certain issues.....the civilized course is discourse.....you talk with the guy you think you don't like or disagree with, and try to persuade that person to your way of thinking........and in the course of talking with that person you get to understand them better, rather than rely on the whispers and heresay of dubious third parties, with their own set of agenda's. Killing 53 of your own nationals, destroying a beautiful hotel, on an Islamic holiday to send out cryptic messages to a person who may not even 'get it' is the behavior of untouchables.
There are no plans for me to visit Pakistan....the last time I was there was 1966--1970 as a Pakistani citizen......in Pindi and Islamabad...just after I was born....and I have innocent hazy beautiful memories of the place as a little toddler.......the pungent smell of the Himalayan flowers.....going out in the evening to buy Tundal roti for dinner, and sweet tomato drinks on paper cones.......buying Tik Tikki sweets at the local tented markets...........the games we played of taking allu Bukhara from the policemans helmet, with his consent (of course they were different then. Now in Pakistan you get out of jail, you can join the police force next day, or become the President of the country)....the hot summer nights spent on roofs, sleeping..........the visits to the Murree Hills, and the toy trains.......the towering Pashtuns with their unkempt hair and wild eyes.......escaping from the school where my mother taught to play marbles with other children, buying and and sharing sweets with the tiffin money.
These are cherished memories of Pakistan, and one does not wish to spoil such memories now with the present situation with all its sad overtones, by going there and contradicting ones earlier childhood memories.
However one was born in South Asia and has some interest in South Asian politics and what develops there....so I blogg, casually, it does not consume my life.......not even a mass sindicated writer, widely read......from this little endevour of blogging one should not falsely gage that I am about to walk into Pakistan, open an Aryan party, take power, and "SORT OUT THE SITUATION/MESS"..........in the real world things don't work out like that........and I have no interest in this.
But I understand that when one is in power, and one does a lot of illegal things, the level of insecurity multplies into doing silly things.........but the fact of the matter is presently, I am not a Pakistani national qualified to hold public office in that country......I don't speak Urdu, Hindi, or even fluent Bengali, and whilst in politics in South Asia a lot of the politicians prefer to speak English in the media, you still have to be able to speak the local tongue fluently in order to qualify for National politics just like any other country. I have no linkages with any Pakistani parties, or any following, or a political base, with which to make things happen politically; nor am I seeking any such thing. I have no interest in active politics , I am apolitical.
However.
I am a son of the soil, and I have a right to give my two cents worth.....If I am being persecuted and harrassed by the Britain because they think I will make an 'impression' on South Asian politics which is detrimental to their interests, then that is all the more reason I must continue to blog about that area.
But presently that does not include visiting Anglophone ISI Pakistan, or Anglophone RAW India (What was it 5 bombs in Delhi or was it 20 recently?), or Anglophone DGFI Bangladesh.....the last experience was bad enough........it was just awful. It is easier to take the daily casual torture and harassment from foreigners then from ones own kind.
In Conclusion, it seems to be an operation from the British, using their local tool the ISI. 95% of all such cryptic messages, harrassment and torture originate from the UK against me, and whilst one cannot rule out other nations who have taken on board the "Zoroastrian bullshit" from the UK, as the British have been very busy teaching others their ways, it seems on the surface at least a British false flag operation.
___________________________________________________
On a separate note these are the main actors responsible for the torture and harassment against me, which ever country I exist in:
The UK...........95% of all the style of torture and harrassment comes from the UK. The micro-wave machine, directed against the body has a strange disorientating effect.....bit like being permanently knocked out, and fatigued. It started in January 1999 in the UK, and presently it is used by local intelligence against me..........in all countries I have visited since. It is the primary obstacle to what one might call a "normal life". Sometimes gas is also used------Viagra in gas form, which turns one a little horny............."He is a sex fiend, be careful", but in the real world ones sex drive went a long time ago. In addition torture, tension and stress ofcourse does not help ones normal sex drive............and in the sum total of the situation romance does not appear as a priority, but merely focusing on the day to day simple existence.
The British have been busy going around teaching others in other countries that doing these illegal things against me is perfectly legitimate and even fun, because of the existence of certain allegations that I am not a good person...................allegations from the UK. ( He very bad man so use these things against the bad man) The symbolic numbers from there is 5.
The main people pushing for this is from London, and perhaps from the wider Jewish community in the UK. It is expressed through the police and more significantly the intelligence agencies through which the Jews exercise considerable power....especially MI5. This harrassment business started in 1986, where I was involved in a near fatal car accident (May 1986) where one student died.
Why?
Your guess is good as mine.....perhaps they feel threatened by me. Not so much by what I might do politically, as I am apolitical, but in terms of ideas I suppose.
Another country also deeply involved in the harrassment and torture is Germany. I was in Germany for a short while, and whilst there I was able to do quite a lot of writing and get my basic ideas out.......in terms of development in this area it was good; it was important. The State provided my rent, and basic upkeep.....and I kept a low profile as always. I was well disposed to Germany, otherwise I would not have visited the country and lived there....and I don't have anti-German feelings, it is a good country with many great things to admire.
I am not aware that any of my writings and ideas constitute a major threat to the German state and its existence. The absence of such things leads me to the conclusion that they have been following me around like a bad smell since 2005, at the instigation of certain people and groups such as Jews........because of my writings on Jews and Israel. As a German debt to Jews.
Symbol of their 'presence' include BMW cars (I was in Munich) and of course Mercedes, VW and very curiously eggs. There are some parts of the cryptic game I really don't get. The number 3 is also used.
And of course finally the USA, has its big Jewish nose in everything, so I suppose it too should be involved in my little circus. Negatively the number 3 is involved, and sometimes the color white, and little dog (!!???).........it seems to be Jewish in its direction and energy, expressed through possibly South Korea, where I was briefly teaching. I assume somewhere US intelligence is also involved.
The USA is a paradox, because some of the greatest amount of good encouragment also comes from the USA. Encouragment varies from "keep up the good work", "don't give up" to..........."come to the USA", and live in this, this and this part ( California, Montana!!! and Hawai).
But I have to say friends realistically once the Jew primes the security in a country against you, it becomes very very difficult to exist normally in a country. A lot of these people are pint sized losers who are pathological and paranoic, and I have had many of them strutting their stuff in front with their wives swaggering and acting clownish................once that situation exists, and takes over you cannot exists normally in ANY country. How does one deal with the paranoia and pathology of others, as exemplified by the events in Islamabad?
