Sep 24, 2008

Eretz Israel and the destruction of the world to get it.



PM Olmert stated that the Eretz Israel dream was unrealistic and unattainable. Was he being sincere or politically posturing for the benefit of the West, as a lame duck PM about to retire. Eretz Israel is a good dream.....for many Jews. Jews have never control an empire of their own, in their name, and now logically with their perceived ascendant power, some of them would like to own one, preferably using America. To be sure they have in their history in the twentieth century controlled countries, but usually as non-Jews indirectly behind the scenes. Germany (1919---1945), The Soviet Union Empire (1918-1991), The American empire since (1898--2008) with Teddy Roosevelt, and finally of course the British empire (1750----1960). But obviously for some of them what they really want is an overt Jewish empire, overtly run by Jews, unashamedly Jewish with upfront Jews running things from the front in their named Jewish empire......not your behind the scenes, name changing stuff to appease the Goyim.


Will it happen? Highly unlikely because they need to win an awful lot of wars to get there.......a huge number of their conspiracies need to work out in their favor continuously for a long time......and the Jews in this area haven't been too lucky, given their history in certain countries. But still a dream is a dream, so why knock it, even if it means the demise of Israel at the end trying to attain it? You can only do so much with a nation of 5 million or so actual Jews....with a population remaining static for a good while, whilst the educated middle class flee to more saner climes.

______________________________________________

Crisis Zionism


By www.Xymphorablogspot.com

Ron Andreas on intentional instability and crisis in the Middle East and elsewhere (found via here):
"Unlike the Western oil majors, the militant Zionist proponents of greater Israel view stability and peace in the Middle East as inimical to their goals. Chaos and strife create the 'revolutionary atmosphere' (as Ben Gurion one of the key founders of the state of Israel put it) in which more land and water resources can be taken under their control. This fact explains the motive behind the ceaseless provocations and destabilization that the Israeli military and secret services perpetrate.

The 'iron wall' policy established by Ze’ev Jabotinsky prior to the founding of the Jewish state requires the expulsion of Christian and Muslim Arabs from Palestine. Such a goal requires war or other violent means. David Ben Gurion stated, 'What is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times; and if at this time the opportunity is missed and what is possible in such great hours is not carried out . . . a whole world is lost.' This reality, of the necessity for violent upheaval to achieve Zionist aims, exposes which party is the true aggressor in the Middle East."

and (note how 'progressive' writers support this deception while hiding their comments as criticism):
"In their struggle to expand the Jewish state in the 'land of Israel,' Zionists have attempted to portray their interests as coinciding with those of the Western imperial powers. Conversely they have tried to portray their opponents as enemies of those powers. Yet the only business sector of the Western powers that has interests that align with Israel’s convulsive militarism is the military industrial complex. An elaborate structure has been established to forge a de facto alliance between Israel’s war hawks and the US military industrial complex. This alliance is evidenced in entities such as the Center for Security Policy, Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs."

and (problems that should be obvious - particularly now! - to Americans; my emphasis in red):
"The radical cabal of Zionists tried to enlist popular support for the wars by alluding to Iraq’s energy resources as Paul Wolfowitz did when he stated, 'Iraq sits on a sea of oil.' However, after five years of occupation likely costing trillions of dollars, there is little hope of securing any preferential access to, much less, reliable control over any energy resources. Prior to the invasion, Exxon/Mobil was the world’s biggest publicly traded entity, a distinction that now falls on its Chinese competitor, SINOPEC.

While the relative market share of U.S. oil majors has declined, the destruction of Iraqi society, the devastation of its scientific and intellectual institutions, and the dismantling of its industrial infrastructure, all Zionist goals, have been achieved. Similarly, the American economy has been brought to a standstill due to high oil prices resulting from the wars and the current account deficit that is largely a result of borrowing for war spending. Over the course of the occupation, the U.S. dollar has declined in value by nearly 40 percent.

Nobel prize winning economist, Joseph Stiglitz has stated that the sanctions imposed on Iran coupled with the war atmosphere in the Gulf region, in general, has caused investment in and development of new oil production to come to a halt, exacerbating the high prices that result from the constant threats issuing out of Tel Aviv and the neocon institutes in Washington. It remains to be seen whether the non-Zionist elites in the Western world can begin to challenge the endless wars for Israel by at the very least opposing the sanctions against dealings with Iran."

It is curious how normal people in the world find it difficult to understand that others have goals which actually require conflict and instability. Much of what we see happening in and around Israel and Zionism can only be explained by the fact that the Zionists have always understood that the highly unlikely goal of Greater Israel can only be obtained through confusion, destruction, crisis and war (Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia, saber rattling against Iran and of course Pakistan). Even the Cold War, now being revitalized by Zionists in the American government, is part of this program (Georgia, Ukraine, Polish missiles defence...). As I keep repeating, the choice is stark: you can stop them now, or you can wait until they wreck the whole world.