Wikilies....gems in the desert.

.
.
.
.
This has already been covered by Scot Creighton far more effectively, which has been posted here before, but further argument that Assange is a Zionist globalist shill, pretending to be "rebel" leaker of State documents that purportedly will bring peace and end the wars, but in REALITY oiling and greasing the paths towards further war for the Zionist Globalists by arguing.....or should we say slipping those little gems of truth in between mountains of opinion and gossip between diplomats......(1) Fake "al-Qaeda" and still alive OBL is active in Pakistan, directing attacks against American troops (OBL passed away in December 2001, and the American unit pretending to look for their agent OBL was dismantled in 2005)....(2) sections of the ISI run and direct attacks against American troops in Afghanistan.....(3) North Korea has given rogue states nuclear armed missiles.......(4) Iran is arming rebels in Iraq who then go on to kill American servicemen (5) All Arab governments would whole heartedly approve an attack on Iran by the USA for Israel once again. All of which are substantively inaccurate save for the ISI allegations, which are a partial revelation, since the USA is the ultimate arbiter and funder of ISI ops in Pakistan, and Afghanistan.

Suffice to say Netanyahu is very happy about Wikileaks leaks.

In that sense ALL the prominent celebrity journalists who back Assange must also at least partially be involved in this Zionist funded Psy-ops......Michael Moore, John Pilger etc.

___________________________

Wikileaks' Assange's Lawyer has connections to Rothschilds

Posted by Wake Up From Your Slumber.

It has emerged recently that Assange is in the UK since October which means that all those three successive and massive US documents "leaks" have been orchestrated by him from his secret residence in the UK.

So why is this done from the UK. The answer is because that is where he is the closest from his masters, the super powerful dynastic Rothschild banking and zionist family.

And now here comes the proof that this is indeed the case:

Assange's lawyer is the prominent Mark Stephens whose law firm Finers Stephens Innocent is legal adviser to the Rothschild Waddesdon Trust which is concerned with the "maintenance, improvement and payment of certain of the outgoings in respect of Waddesdon Manor (Rothschild's most prestigious property in the UK) in the Vale of Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire."

The Wadesdon Trust's board of trustees is chaired by the Queen''s former Private Secretary Lord Fellowes and has three Rothschild family members as trustees, Lord (Jacob) Rothschild, Lady Rothschild (his wife) and Beth Matilda Rothschild. It is domiciled 14 St James's Place in London which is also the London address of Lord Jacob Rothschild and his high profile wealth management business St. James's Place Group (formerly J. Rothschild Assurance Group).

http://www.charityperformance.com/charity-details.php?id=17426

Besides that, and as a side note, Mark Stephens law firm Finers Stephens Innocent appears to have a strong focus in providing tax avoidance advisory services to mega-rich customers (see Michael Lewis and Simon Malkiel particularly) such as, I suspect, Sir Philip Green who advises the government on how to recover the mega money his and his peers avoid to pay in taxes thanks to the services of Finers Stephens Innocent's lawyers by squeezing public services, etc....

http://www.fsilaw.com/

In summary Assange's lawyer is a high profile establishment lawyer whose law firm works for the Rothschilds.

It seems to me that this is proof enough that Assange is a Rothschild puppet and that Wikileaks is a Rothschild operation.

______________________________

Source: David Icke Forums, posted by secretagent

The Chamar chamcha chaudi Coolie Gunga Din's of the Pakistan military.

.
.
.
.
The Chamar Chamcha Chaudi Coolie Gunga Din's of the Pakistan military are destroying Pakistan.

They have been destroying Pakistan since the 1950's where through careful destabilization of the nascent political structure left by Jinnah they eventually came to power in 1958, though defacto in "power" by 1954, as any Pakistani insider will vouch.

Specifically it was done via the ISI, set up by the departing Raj in 1948 and Major General R. Cawthome, then Deputy Chief of Staff in the new Pakistan army and head of the ISI (1948-1956......more probably into 1959), seconded from the British Imperial Army. Think about that.....a General from the utterly evil British Rothschild empire RUNNING Pakistan's most sensitive state institution 12 years into independence. We NOW know that intelligence agencies are the primary tools of mischief and management by the globalist Zionists. What was he doing at that sensitive post, so many many years into "independence besides toasting crumpets and making Tetley tea?

The head of the Pakistan army at that time were British officers until 1951, General Messervy and later General Gracey.......4 years into "Independence" of Pakistan. Since that time British generals have developed very close personal relations with senior Pakistani officers....for example General Sir Charles Guthrie with Musharaf, or General Thomas with Zia ul-Haq. Now American senior officers such as Admiral Mullen play that "mentoring guiding" role visiting Kiyani and verse versa very frequently in a few years, supplanting the British through money, patronage and arms aid.

Pakistan was created by the departing British Raj to weaken and divide India. Jinnah was a British agent, never arrested in his entire career of nearly 40 years as a senior "freedom figure" involved in the freedom struggle as a Barrister since 1900. Jinnah loved ham sandwiches, enjoyed sherry/brandy, never seen near a Mosque....and nearly ALL his speeches to the devoted illiterate Muslims were in perfect Oxbridge English (Amazing the power of propaganda and what a few well placed British intelligence Officers as guiding lights can/could do with their puppets).

Most Pakistani leaders since, possibly with the exception of ZAB have been foreign owned puppets. Even the Israelis got into the business when they successfully recruited one Perverse Toupee Musharaf, a commando in the Pakistan army......and a MOSSAD agent since the early 1980's, and a Deobandi/Wahabi/Salafi hardliner at the same time....amazing. Who wanted to attack India and make peace with India at the same time. Most Pakistanis now hate him, but he now wants to return to rule the country. He is the one leader who more than any other has sold out Pakistan to the Americans the most, brutalizing Pakistani society along his Mossad/Deobandi process 1999--2008.

The Muslim League was a British created and run fiction since 1905. The British were in a rather hurry to create Pakistan because they knew Jinnah their agent wouldn't live very long.....so the 200 year British rule in India quickly, and unceremoniously ended with them handing over power to their chosen agents in Pakistan's case, or their own people in the case of the Pakistan military.(commander and Deputy commander ---were British)

The Pakistan military is crap. Its the worst military in the world. Its jolly good acha hai at killing its own people. A fine neo-colonial legacy. "No problem saab....teek hai saab.......I don't need to blink or think or lose any sleep over this". Statistically the Pakistan military have killed more of its own people than any other existing military institutions around the world (hello researchers?).

The Pakistan military is the MAIN THREAT to the stability and well being of Pakistan.

Unfortunately this simple obvious fact stated above hasn't YET dawned on the common Pakistani people, because whilst the Pakistan military might be the worst military in the world, it does have quite an effective propaganda department, otherwise known as the ISI, and the usual Third World greasy methods of controlling "pure truth"....(Pakistan is a very dangerous place for journalists who are not on the ISI payroll).

Pakistani politicians aren't perfect, far from it, but they were never the midwives giving birth to the greatest national disasters that continually faltering Pakistan has experienced since independence..........ITS THE PAKISTAN MILITARY:

Simple superficial examples for the sake of time and getting it across..............

1. The Pakistan military and especially through its special Think Tank the ISI has been destabilizing civilian governments since the 1950's, and then declaring martial law, after the apparent failure of the destabilized civilian governments, which was originally caused by the Pakistan military in the first place........1958, 1977, 1999. Such action by the Pakistan military most probably received outside encouragement from either the UK in the 1950's, or the American more recently. The classic Mir Jaffar/Mir Sadiq syndrome. The cumulative effect of this on Pakistani society has been quite obviously very negative. Pakistan requires, urgently needs stable civilian government rule for prolonged periods, which is not merely in power as a puppet of the USA (Zardari government) to give the veneer of Democratic legitimacy, but as a reasonably EFFECTIVE government, by Third World standards........and is assertive in controlling and managing the Pakistan military (and not the other way round, courtesy of USA largess as is currently the case) The current destabilization of Pakistan is being carried out by..........guess who........the Pakistan military and their fundie proxies too numerous to mention, and by defacto American backing.

2. War clarifies many things. War often exposes the severe weaknesses and tensions inherent within especially Third World states. That is why it is a very good idea to avoid war at all costs. However against prevailing wisdom, the genius's at the Pakistan military launched the 1965 WAR against India hoping to catch India with its pants down, after their defeat in 1962. They launched the war against India with 1 weeks worth of spare parts and ammunition. After a day or two of initial gains due to the element of surprise they soon were on the defensive, given that India was/is a far greater military power, and the Pakistanis American imported arms simply stopped operating due to a lack of..........spares/ammunition. India could have invaded East Pakistan, and captured Lahore quite easily there after, but for the pressure of the USA to back off. India after the war smiled, shook hands with Pakistan in Tashkent, and then began seriously to separate East Pakistan from West Pakistan........from 1968 (containing 45% of the national economy of Pakistan, 45% of exports and 57% of the population)...which was defended by a very weak lone infantry division of West Pakistanis........East Pakistanis were not trusted by the West Pakistanis either to fight for Pakistan or even defend their own territory. India eventually prevailed.

3. Field Marshal Ayub Khan after being destabilized and removed by the Americans 1965--1969, was replaced by General Yahya Khan. Yahya Khan was an interesting "patriotic" man straight out of Kipling's books. He referred to East Pakistanis as Mosquito's, and in one public speech given in Dhaka (get this...for PR value) he said East Pakistan would be a great place, especially for agriculture, without any East Pakistanis existing there. Yahya Khan represented the class of Pakistani British Sandhurst trained officers who mirrored typical British colonial attitudes, which obviously included severely negative perspectives of Bengali's...........The East India company and later the British Raj through Kipling and others propagated extremely negative perspective of the "dreaded Bengali babu" (The historical and psychological reasons are too complicated to go into now.....but it is akin to a rapists perspective of his victim). This leftover of colonial prejudice expressed itself naturally when the Pakistan military using Islamic fundamentalists as a fifth column committed mass genocide and war crimes in East Pakistan over 9 months in 1971, killing 3,000,000 civilians, 500,000 rapes and creating 10,000,000 war refugees into neighboring India........giving India the PERFECT reason to invade East Pakistan, and decisively defeat the Pakistan military. 93,000 Pakistani POW in Indian hands, 10,000 troops dead, and the country destroyed and divided thanks to the Pakistan military......and Civilian politicians from Pakistan going to India begging for mercy in 1972, and the return of the murdering, genocidal worthless POW's. This genocide is the direct responsibility of the Pakistan military, and the British State through its significant WELL ESTABLISHED influence over the senior officers in the Pakistan military. The Pakistan military must answer and face war crimes charges and genocide eventually.

4. Yes it is true ZAB ordered the Baluchistan military campaign of 1973--1977, which claimed the lives of 50,000 to 100,000 civilians, but it is equally true that the actual manner of the campaign was determined by the Pakistan military. Since the 1960's the state has been turned int a virtual garrison state, and has been under a brutal military regime since, with little respect for the lives of ordinary Baluchis. There is much talk of Indian misconduct and covert ops in Baluchistan via their so called Consulates in Afghanistan, but as with East Pakistan ultimately it is the conduct of the Pakistan military SINCE THE 1950'S which is decisively unsettling the state, and not the very recent allegations of wishful imaginary Indian meddling. Most humans are sedentary creatures and if they rebel it is usually for a very good reason. The Pakistan military does not learn from its lessons, but repeats the same same mistakes it made in East Pakistan in alienating fellow Pakistanis either through heavy handedness or Punjabi chauvinism. Schizophrenically, whilst the Pakistanis attempt to build economic ties with Iran, they simultaneously are hosting Jundullah, an anti Iranian separatist movement which wants to liberate Iranian Baluchistan. Surely a free Iranian Baluchistan is a threat to Pakistan's sovereignty as well.

5. Jews such as Bernard Lewis from the British Intelligence/Foreign Office establishment in the 1970's started preaching about creating the "Arc of Crisis" in the Greater Middle East, especially in the USA academic Think Tank circles, and as with the Greek to the Roman's ideas it gained currency, especially in the Neo-liberal Carter administration filled with Jewish globalists. The idea was simple and appealed to those who wanted vengeance against the Soviet Union for their backing of the Vietcong and their successful defeat of the Americans. The idea was to set the Middle East on fire using Islamic Fundamentalists proxies, and especially the Islamic Brotherhood based in Egypt to destabilize the Soviet Unions Southern belt, and draw her into the "Bear Trap" of Afghanistan.

The evil Rothschild British Empire was already well acquainted with various Islamist groups that it helped create in India......Muslim League (1905), against Indian nationalism, and the Islamic Brotherhood in Egypt in the 1920's, against Egyptian nationalism, whose very first Mosque the British helped fund in Cairo.

From the Western Imperialists perspective, Islamic fundamentalists are considered an excellent asset for the greater imperial vision, because given their vague impractical Pan-Islamic objectives, they thwart true NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT in specific emerging Third world countries. Islamic Fundamentalist Movements are also regressive, backward looking and anti-modernization and anti-development.......for the Israelis, later into the 1950's these are equally excellent reasons for backing Islamic Fundamentalists especially within Palestinian society, in addition to both dividing it (Christian vs Moslem Palestinians) and to give the image that Israel in comparison to Palestinians are cool, hip, modern, civilized and thus "deserving'" of Western sympathy and help. Israel created Hamas in the 1970's.....In 1981 the Islamic Brotherhood killed Anwar Sadat President of Egypt....There was an Islamic Brotherhood uprising in Syria in 1982....The Shah of Iran was removed from power by the USA/UK/France/Israel in 1979 and replaced with illiterate mullahs who have since done a lot of colorful things both within and without Iran.......AND finally where Pakistan comes into the picture the USA set the "Bear Trap" in Afghanistan for the Soviet Union, by using Pakistan into backing Islamic Fundamentalists to destabilize the Communist regime in Kabul.....and we have "Operation Cyclone" and "Operation Greenbelt" there on in........billions of $ pouring in from various sources, illicit drugs businesses being established using local criminals, and arms shipments from again various shady sources...and a lot of security people feeling self important and happy with their new programs and wealth, and at the center of the ongoing drama.

In Pakistan General Zia Ul Haq instituted an Islamisation program within Pakistan, based on the above trend in the Greater Middle East and no doubt encouraged by his British/American handlers...500,000 trained Jihadi's within Pakistani society trained by the ever excellent Pakistan military since the late 1970's. From the Pakistan military perspective such people are an asset to be used by the military in various operation within Pakistan against perceived political enemies, regional enemies, Shia and other minorities OR in foreign operations in Afghanistan, and India in particular.......the Pakistan military can thus exert force and project power without being directly involved. To the rest of us, such military proxy creations are a very dangerous destabilization force in any given society, because once you have armed and trained them, how do then control them effectively, especially in a failed State such as Pakistan? Such organizations create a bad image of Pakistan, and allow other nations such as the USA to attack Pakistan, and kill innocent civilians, based on such a reputation. Emboldened by such a move from the late 1970's, the Pakistani military have used such groups against ALL of Pakistan's neighbors....against Afghanistan, China, India and even Iran since.

6. In 1994 the Jewish Sandy Berger Deputy Head to the NSA in the NSC in the neo-liberal Clinton administration came to Pakistan and told the Coolies that they should establish the Taliban, religious Islamic fundamentalists students from the Afghan refugee camps of Pakistan. The Taliban guided, armed, trained and embedded by Pakistani security personnel would take over Afghanistan, and vola! Pakistan would have a federated arrangement with neighbor Afghanistan, and "Strategic Depth" viz India. The previous Afghan Mujaheddin backed by Pakistan (1978---1994), and especially hardline groups such as Hekmatyar and Haqqani especially favored by Pakistan failed to make headway in terms of establishing a reasonably effectively united government which would be very pro-Pakistani, far from it when the nascent governments in Kabul under a broad coalition fell out and descended into civil war......this was obviously unsatisfactory for Pakistan.

Pakistan and Afghanistan had previously entered into greater cooperation and negotiations for a federated arrangement in the 1950''s and this seemed logical for both states given the close multi-level ties between the two states. This process was however scuppered when the Pakistan military led by the Pashtun Ayub Khan declared martial law in 1958, and adopted a slightly more hostile view of Independent non-aligned Afghanistan.

By backing the Taliban the Pakistan military hoped to achieve this dream from the 1950's. However they failed to realize the threats and dangers of backing fundamentalists into power in a neighboring state such as Afghanistan for Pakistan. In addition, with covert American encouragement Afghanistan became a giant pool of fundamentalists of varying shades concentrated in the country, including one OBL invited into the country by Pakistan in 1996 from Sudan. Steadily with covert American backing and blessing the Taliban eventually managed to take over 90% of Afghanistan IN ADDITION TO hosting about 5000 foreign Islamists fighters, subcontracted out by the USA in ops in Bosnia from 1994, and Kosovo from 1998.

There after the myth of "al-Qaeda" was created by the USA, and sustained and supported by the Pakistani military to this day. .....who purportedly carried out many terrorist ops in the Greater Middle East, Europe and the USA and 9/11. No doubt the Pakistani military annexed to the USA feel confident, and smart participating in this elaborate charade that harms millions, not least fellow Pakistanis. BUT any individual with basic common sense can see the dangers of such American manufactured fairy tales for PAKISTAN. First being called the most dangerous unstable nation on earth can't in any conceivable sense be beneficial for Pakistan. The dangerously failed nuke armed state with multiple strategic, and structural state problems. In the name of pursuing phantom enemies created by the USA, namely "al-Qaeda" and the Taliban which is still run this day by the Pakistan military for the Americans as "Controlled Opposition"......the Pakistani military are committing treason against their own country, and helping the USA kill countless civilians in sovereign Pakistan territory. Finally the Pakistan military are helping the Americans slowly occupy Pakistan.

7. Nawaz Sharif of the PML was in power as head of a civilian government between 1996---1999. Naturally as head of the civilian government he attempted to consolidate his power within the country through a variety of actions, mostly legal. This obviously irked the Pakistan Military never too happy about a strong civilian government residing in Islamabad......becoming independent and self assured, and therefore winning a second term. NO PAKISTANI CIVILIAN GOVERNMENT HAS/HAD EVER SERVED A SECOND SUCCESSFUL TERM THANKS TO THE PAKISTANI MILITARY AND THEIR WESTERN BACKERS. What alarmed the military the most was the peace overtures towards India over all matters and especially settlement of the Kashmir dispute. The Pakistani military wasn't about to give the enormous prestige that would obviously come, and thus legitimacy to any civilian government which would make peace with India.

The Pakistan military WORTHLESS IN ALL RESPECTS accept in the business of killing unarmed Pakistani civilians used the Azad Kashmir rally call to justify its worthless bloated size, and project itself as the true defender of Pakistan's sovereignty and UNITY (sick joke).........so in this noble rally call four Pakistani generals and one Mossad agent, Pervez Toupee Musharaf conspired to instigate a short border clash with India, with the objective of scuppering DEVELOPING on-going peace talks between India and Pakistan. Musharaf in between playing golf used the NLI paramilitary, some Jihadis and a few SSG'S from Musharaf's units, poorly equipped for the operation but enough to create a stink between the two nations. The result obviously was 4,000 Pakistani combatants killed 550 on the Indian side, and a weakening of Sharif's position in power in Pakistan. The callousness of a SECTION of the Pakistan military carrying out such operations with utter disregard for lives lost, and not withstanding the fact that here was yet another occasion the excellent Indian military had soundly beaten the Pakistanis, after a few days of initial success. For Musharaf, ends must have justified means because he came into power a few months later (and one guesses that this was ALL done with covert American backing).......justice is calling in Pakistan, which means giving Sharif the chance to finish his second term finally soon, very soon.

8. Surrendering sovereignty to the USA, aiding attacks against fellow Pakistanis. This is now well documented thanks to publications globally by reliable Western and Pakistani sources. The Pakistani military, after spending the better part of 60 years killing unarmed Pakistani civilians has now gone one better by aiding the USA in killing unarmed Pakistani civilians on sovereign Pakistani soil, in the pursuit of wholly bogus causes that it fully knows about, namely that "al-Qaeda" elements still exists on Pakistani soil, which constitute a viable threat to Occupation forces, and that the Taliban is a true Afghan resistance group which again is a threat to Occupation forces in neighboring Afghanistan. In the process of aiding the Americans in this bogus war known as GWOT, the Pakistani military has allowed up to 5000 American servicemen into Pakistani soil, and more on the way, occupying whole Pakistani military bases in Sindh, Baluchistan, NWFP and even the Punjab........It is well known that a good deal of the terrorism in Pakistan is the result of the Pakistani military through their Jihadi proxies.......as much as a lot of the so called Real IRA/IRA were the actual handiwork of British security forces.....but imagine that a lot of the terrorism in Pakistan IN ADDITION COULD also be the work of the private security contractors such as XE (Blackwater renamed) and other such security organizations such as Dyncorps. The strategic logic of the Pakistani military defies logic allowing America to kill Pakistani civilians with impunity in the name of fighting a bogus terror war...WHAT SELF RESPECTING NATION WITH A MODICUM OF DIGNITY WOULD ALLOW THIS???? Yes Turkish security forces committed atrocities against Turkish civilians in the 1970's, and then blamed such work on the Kurds or left wing groups.......BUT never with the aid of outside forces......SO OVERTLY. Then as stated before what is the point of having a 800,000 unofficial standing regular military with 30 odd divisions, and a 300,000 paramilitary force if you require a regressive state such as the USA to carry out basic security ops against YOUR OWN OWNED PROXIES WHICH WERE ORIGINALLY BLESSED BY THE USA, and one Sandy Berger....where is the logic in all this destabilization of Pakistan, and fighting ceaseless wars in Pakistan based on bogus causes?

The great propaganda paradox of claiming to be Pakistan's greatest defenders, but in reality its WORST ENEMY. Simple below average educated Pakistanis will not be able to grasp this fact too easily, and the Pakistani military will continue playing them for suckers.

What Pakistan needs is a "struggle" by the civilian population to usurp the power of the military. In doing so they will also have to confront the regressive and negative influence of the USA in Pakistan. In that sense Nawaz Sharif is incorrect in courting the Americans now......Zionist run JEWSA is simply no good for Pakistan....it NEVER will be good for Pakistan, and the sooner this simple fact is accepted the better it will be psychologically for Pakistan's true national leaders. Zardari and his eventual removal is the main objective now politically, but in doing so it must be remembered he is not the main problem. He is merely a powerless puppet brought into power by the USA via the services of the ISI in 2008 to give a democratic veneer to American power in Pakistan and its policies....his removal will not solve Pakistan's problems wholly. But yet he must be removed.

The objective is to get Nawaz Sharif into power as soon as possible.......Pakistanis must not put up with 3 more years of this utter mess, and national humiliation. They must press for fresh elections SOON. 3 more years of the puppet Zardari's rule will mean 3 ever more worse years to come (there's no silver lining in ALL this) where the Americans with their Zionist agenda will be further entrenched into Pakistan for the worse.......then the mess will become so bad, nobody will care if the military or some other Chaudi takes the reins of power.

Sitting passively and hoping for the best is no good.....the Pakistani civilian population must agitate for a better future NOW, from today. The Pakistan military have clearly shown through open deception and double speak that they will not defend Pakistan, but merely engage in amassing more American arms for some dubious future strategies of unknown credibility. The Pakistan military have chosen their side and it is the side of Zionist America.

Yes its the elite and the Pakistani military

Pakistan military waging war against Pakistan

Speaking the truth in failed state das Pakistan

Pakistan's slow occupation and eventual collapse

Seeing the light a bit late

Dangerous double game by the Pakistan military

___________________________________

ISI on the run, refuses to explain its role in drone attacks!

Related article:

General Kayani allowed US special forces to secretly operate in Pakistan

In a visible expression of disrespect and distrust of politicians, the ISI has refused to brief the Pakistan Parliament’s standing committee on defense about their role and cooperation with the US drone attacks on Pakistani territory.

According to recent revelations by Wikileaks the current drone operations in Pakistan are being conducted by the USA with due permission and help from Pakistan Army / ISI.

A few days ago, the National Assembly Standing Committee on Defense had taken serious view of the media reports that US was seeking to expand drone attacks in Quetta. The committee is chaired by the PPP MNA from Sindh, Azra Afzal.

The NA committee, which met at the Parliament House on 25 November, sought a clarification from the Interior, Foreign and Defence Ministries by December 7. The committee also directed for a special briefing on ISI role in the war on terror.

The ISI has however refused to welcome parliamentarians in their headquarters because of ‘security concerns’.

The ISI, which is largely conceived as a state within the state of Pakistan, is notorious for its disrespect for elected representatives of the people, and also for its illegal interference in the country’s political system.

According to the ISI’s criteria, almost all politicians and activists (except Imran Khan, Munawar Hassan, General Hameed Gul, Hafiz Saeed, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, Pir Pagara etc) are a risk to the national security of Pakistan.

In the past, the ISI and its paid agents in Pakistani media have categorized elected Prime Ministers Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif as a threat to the national security.

Same allegations are currently being leveled against the elected President Asif Zardari, Prime Mnister Yusuf Raza Gilani and their aides including Interior Minister Rehman Malik and Law Minister Babar Awan etc.

___________________________

Inter-Services Intelligence
Faith, Unity, Discipline

The Evil Zionist agenda

.
.
.
.
I suppose when you are focused on how to make a fast buck from the Afghan opium, and then you go on to flood the stuff in your own country, in Europe and Russia using the facilities of your MILITARY, then the last thing on your mind is the Afghan people........30 years of Zionist globalist mischief in Afghanistan using the services of the Chamar Chamacha Chaudi Coolie ISI/Pakistan military, has brought the good honest Afghan people nothing but utter misery, where upon "bad" Afghans of criminal disposition have been elevated, and good Afghans marginalized or killed, either by the USA, or by the Taliban...or by the ISI in Abdul Haq's case.

Its not that these Jews can't do better in terms of serving the Afghan people, a nation once existing in medieval isolated bliss bothering nobody, but they won't........for their "INTELLECTUAL ELITE" in the words of Rockefeller means the Afghan people must continue to suffer under continued American occupation and intrusion under the guiding light of the Jewish Globalist agenda.

“It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a
world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite
and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” Rockefeller, 1991

If this is what International Jewish/Zionist Banker globalist Utopia looks like (In Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan in reality...run by Jewish banker puppet governments, as with the former Soviet Union)............. then give me petty alert guarded fervent regional nationalism every and any day.

_________________________

Hunger and Anger in Afghanistan

by Kathy Kelly at antiwar.com

The Obama administration has announced the imminent release of a December Review which will evaluate the U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan. The military has yet to disclose what the specific categories for evaluation will be. Yet many people in Afghanistan might wish that hunger along with their anger over attacks against civilians could top the list.

In Afghanistan, a nation where 850 children die every day, about a quarter of the population goes hungry. The UN says that 7.4 million Afghans live with hunger and fear of starvation, while millions more rely on food help, and one in five children die before the age of five.

"Do you think we like to live this way?" an Afghan man asked me, last October, as he led us toward a primitive tent encampment on the outskirts of Kabul. "Do you see how we live? The cold and the rain are coming. How will we protect our children?" He flicked his forefinger on a weather-beaten blanket covering a tent. The blanket immediately ripped.

Standing next to him was a man who quietly handed me three crumpled photos, never lifting his eyes from the ground. The spokesperson identified the man as his cousin. The first picture showed his cousin’s ruined home. A U.S. aerial bombardment had destroyed the dwelling. The next pictures were of two bloodied children. "All of his children were killed," the spokesperson said. "All his family, his wife, his five children, by an attack from the air." He went on to explain that they had been goat herders in the San Gin province of Afghanistan. They were happy with their lives, selling yoghurt and fattening their animals. A Taliban fighter had come to their village at night. The U.S. apparently wanted to kill this fighter, but instead they destroyed his cousin’s family. "We couldn’t stay there," the spokesperson said, pointing to a picture of the debris that was once his cousin’s home. "We were afraid we might be hit again, so all of us left. We are four families."

Inside one of the tents, a young mother welcomed me to sit down on the only available cushion. It appeared that they slept on the ground. The families share one pot over a fire pit, and a few utensils. They also have access to a water pump. Near their area is a tent where they join for prayers, and also one that is used for classes. One man begged us to tell the authorities that they have no medicines in the camp and that many of the children are ill.

Days earlier, in a far more comfortable setting, students at the Bamiyan University, located in the central, mountainous province of Bamiyan, had prodded us to comprehend their anger. In a straw poll, several dozen were unanimous in stating that they want the U.S. to leave their country. Several insisted that most U.S. people don’t understand or care about the impact of U.S. warfare in Afghanistan. An engineering student held up a copy of the Time magazine cover which showed a young Afghan woman whose nose was horribly mutilated, allegedly as punishment for defying men in her family. Time‘s accompanying headline announced that the story would explain why U.S. troops must remain in Afghanistan. "Do Americans care more about noses than fingers?" the student asked. "Who will cover the stories about fingers that are cut off?!" I felt embarrassed not to know what he was talking about. Several weeks later, I read a New York Times article about a trial taking place at an army base in Washington State. The article shed light on the student’s question. A U.S. Staff Sergeant from the 5th Stryker Combat Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division was charged with leading a conspiracy to randomly target and kill unarmed Afghan civilians. He and four other soldiers faced murder charges. The staff sergeant is alleged to have planted evidence to cover up the murders and to have carved fingers off corpses which he kept as war souvenirs.

Although the U.S. military forbids soldiers to mutilate corpses and go on killing sprees that target civilians, the U.S. occupying forces in Afghanistan have bragged, in recent weeks, about increased capacities to kill with ever more invulnerable weapons. A company of 16 Abrams tanks was recently delivered to Afghanistan. "We’ve taken the gloves off," said an unnamed U.S. military official, "and it has had huge impact." (Washington Post, November 19, 2010) The 68-ton tanks fire high explosive, white phosphorus and anti-personnel shells that can destroy a house a mile away. Each tank costs 4.3 million dollars and uses 3 gallons of jet fuel per mile.

The Pentagon is also sending 12,500 XM25 Individual Air Burst Weapons to Afghanistan, one to each infantry squad and Special Forces team in Afghanistan. The XM25 gun can fire a projectile that will travel the length of eight football fields. "When fired, the projectile is designed to explode directly above a target," says the Army Times, "raining shrapnel down on an enemy crouched behind cover."

In a report to the November 2010 NATO conference held in Lisbon, 29 aid groups working in Afghanistan warned that the increases in air attacks, the use of night raids, and the destruction of civilian property contributes to "rapidly deteriorating" security for most Afghans and a rise in civilian casualties. People who flee from U.S. attacks face food insecurity, loss of income, lack of health care, and homelessness. The aid groups’ report is entitled "Nowhere to Turn." Increasingly, Afghans living in war zones have nowhere to hide.

Commenting on impoverishment and displacement caused by military offensives, a Pakistani op-ed recently compared hunger and anger to two live wires. When the wires touch, they create an incandescent and uncontrollable flash.

It’s hard to imagine the extent of explosive popular rage that would result if the shoe were on the other foot, if U.S. people were subject to aerial bombing, night raids, destruction of civilian homes, displacement and starvation. In reality, the live wires of hunger and anger could exist in our lives too; we could be angry, very angry, about this war, angry enough to make it a political issue. But if our hunger were for an end to the war, if our hunger even signaled a desire to rethink and repent our murderous policies, if we honestly sought forgiveness from Afghan civilians who’ve borne the brunt of our war of choice, then perhaps an uncontrollable and incandescent flash of fairness and peace could govern our future.

Its official, Wikileaks is a Zionist Globalist psy-ops.

.
.
.
.

“Trying to Explain the World” – How the Globalist’s PR Agents Use the Wikileaks Psyops Program

Originally posted by willyloman

UPDATED: Assange partying at STATE DEPARTMENTS’s embassy in Iceland with Sam Watson, the embassy’s deputy chief of mission

by Scott Creighton

There’s a Little Parsons in All of Us

Michel Chossudovsky over at Global Research has put up an interesting NPR transcript with some rather revealing statements about Wikileaks that were made by the New York Times chief Washington correspondent, David Sanger. Sanger is one of the New York Times reporters who have been reading and writing about the different state department memos “leaked” by Wikileaks. He was also involved in meetings with the Obama administration and others which selected and redacted the cables that would be published.

Go here to listen to the audio file of the Dec. 8th 2010 “Fresh Air” interview. Go here to read the entire transcript at Global Research.

It’s important at first to understand briefly who David Sanger is. Sanger is a Washington insider with a great deal of access to the White House under both the Bush and Obama regimes. He even speaks in his book about being in the White House Situation Room. He wrote a book called “The Inheritance: The World Obama Confronts and the Challenges to American Power” in which basically he supports the need to attack Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and even Iran. Pretty much the entire Global War on Terror is just fine with David Sanger and he spends most of his life doing his best to drum-up support for it on the left.

The following is a part of the Amazon Product Description of Sanger’s book:

“Sanger takes readers into the White House Situation Room to reveal how Washington penetrated Tehran’s nuclear secrets, leading President Bush, in his last year, to secretly step up covert actions in a desperate effort to delay an Iranian bomb. Meanwhile, his intelligence chiefs made repeated secret missions to Pakistan as they tried to stem a growing insurgency and cope with an ally who was also aiding the enemy–while receiving billions in American military aid. Now the new president faces critical choices: Is it better to learn to live with a nuclear Iran or risk overt or covert confrontation? Is it worth sending U.S. forces deep into Pakistani territory at the risk of undermining an unstable Pakistani government sitting on a nuclear arsenal? It is a race against time and against a new effort by Islamic extremists–never before disclosed–to quietly infiltrate Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program….

… It examines the chilling calculus of North Korea’s Kim Jong-Il, who built actual weapons of mass destruction in the same months that the Bush administration pursued phantoms in Iraq, then sold his nuclear technology in the Middle East in an operation the American intelligence apparatus missed.” Amazon product description of “The Inheritance”

Each and every globalist agenda is parroted and supported by Sanger in his book. It’s all given a “liberal” veneer and a “bipartisan” seal of approval. That’s the role that Sanger fills. And he gets paid well for it. This should not shock any readers here. What Sanger is, is clear to anyone who cares to look.

“Sanger is member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Aspen Strategy Group together with Madeleine K. Albright, Richard Hass, R Talbott, Robert.B. Zoellick (president of the World Bank), and Philip Zelikow (formerly executive director of the 9/11 Commission) Chossudovsky

The globalist agenda pushed by institutions like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Aspen Strategy Group is clear at this point, or it should be as that it is nearly complete. For those of you who don’t understand it yet, let me offer this little tidbit from David Rockefeller…

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years.”

“It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a
world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite
and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” Rockefeller, 1991

David Sanger’s agenda is pretty obvious and has been well established over the years. Certainly this is why he was hand selected to head up the New York Times part of this PR program.

Now let’s take a look at some of the important revelations that were made in the NPR interview.

David Sanger likes Joe Lieberman and respects his work on “national security”

“I’ve covered Senator Lieberman for a long time, and learned a lot from him about national security.” Sanger

That statement pretty much stands for itself. I don’t think there is a more fascist authoritarian in congress than Joe Lieberman now that Hillary Clinton has a new business address.

Another statement is interesting because it shows that the New York Times didn’t get their “leaks” from Wikileaks, but instead they got them from The Guardian, another globalist controlled publication. You would think that something as big as the Wikileaks, the Guardian might want to keep the exclusive for themselves. Imagine all that money they gave up handing over these “leaks” to the New York Times. Makes one think that there was a larger agenda at work. Now remember, Wikileaks didn’t just publish these things themselves, instead, for some reason, they handed them over (supposedly) to the Guardian and let them edit them and select them as they saw fit. If Assange didn’t see that coming, if he didn’t KNOW that the globalist institutions would use these documents in this way prior to his handing them over, he’s an idiot.

“We didn’t get the initial leak. It came to us through whoever gave it to WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks gave it to The Guardian in London. The Guardian gave it to us. It was out there, and the question was not whether the world would learn about it.” Sanger

The following set of quotes tells you everything you need to know about how institutionalized the globalist mindset is in David Sanger…

“The question was whether it would be released in a responsible manner and whether it would be interpreted in a way that readers around the world have expected the New York Times to deal with major news events, that is put it in perspective and explain it and explain what it means to the United States and to citizens around the world.” Sanger

If you think he is hinting at the fact that he actually thinks reporting at the Times is nothing more than serving a larger agenda, you ain’t heard nothing yet. He was asked if he thought Assange was a journalist… here is his reply…

“I don’t, and the reason is that I believe what journalists do is not only dig out information but filter it, explain it, put it in context, do those things that you’ve come to expect of the New York Times and other great American newspapers and other media organizations for many decades.” Sanger

I refer you back to the quote from David Rockefeller… “It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.” As Sanger says ”filter it… put it in context…”?

Sanger goes on with his explanation (which gives us a glimpse not only into the twisted Orwellian mind of a leading Washington globalist correspondent, but it also gives us a better understanding of the entire Wikileaks project as a whole…)…

“He’s (Assange) coming to this with a political motivation. As journalists at the Times and elsewhere, we are not. We are coming at this to explain the world. He was trying, as – just to use his own words, to embarrass the United States and make clear that America’s actions are different than its rhetoric.

Well, in fact when you look through these documents, America’s actions are pretty consistent with its rhetoric.” Sanger

The globalist agenda does not exist in polite, public conversations. Certainly not for leading Washington correspondents like David Sanger. But if you look at his track record, if you look at his book, there isn’t a single globalist lie this man won’t parrot right up until the very moment they are exposed as lies. Then he will simply wait a year or two and quietly try to build up fraudulent support for those lies all over again… letting “history decide” the rightness of our cause. If that sounds like the Ministry of Truth rewriting history to serve their non-existent agenda, you’re not alone. Lies to go to war, lies to impose cruel sanctions that kill half a million kids, lies to justify CIA death squads in nations that we have no business in, all for the Global War on Terror, and all for what Rockefeller called…

The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite
and world bankers …

Decades ago Daniel Ellsberg chose Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky to edit his leaks, the Pentagon Papers, and now Jullian Assange, by forfeit, selects the likes of David Sanger? But did he really select anyone or has this been such an important project that Jullian Assange has had little to nothing to do with it?

Have a look at this obvious contradiction of Sanger’s…

“If we had done nothing, if we had ignored it, I think it would have looked strange. I think that also would have been irresponsible. It is the responsibility of American journalism, back to the founding of this country, to get out and try to grapple with the hardest issues of the day and to do it independently of the government.” Sanger

And then just a few minutes later…

“… We’re explaining what’s important here and what’s not. And we’re filtering it out to try to avoid the greatest harm to individuals (like Israel, India?), ongoing operations and so forth.

… you know, had we waited until this all just appeared on the Internet and then tried to catch up with it… but we would not have had any real time to digest it or certainly to think as hard as we did about what should and shouldn’t be redacted.

… But we were concerned at the Times, and it’s one of the reasons that we went through so carefully to try to redact material that we thought could be damaging to individuals or undercut ongoing operations. And we even took the very unusual step of showing the 100 cables or so that we were writing from to the U.S. government and asking them if they had additional redactions to suggest.” Sanger

Now how is that “independent of the government” as Sanger has already claimed is the responsibility and tradition of American journalism?

He goes on…

As I stated before, there isn’t a single American/British/Israeli globalist agenda that isn’t strongly supported by the Wikileaks ”leaks”. Sanger goes on to talk about the alleged 19 missiles that were supposed to have been sent by North Korea (Axis of Evil) to Iran (Axis of Evil). Since it’s appearance, to my knowledge, the cable is still not published and it will continue to get press and be referenced over and over again til the facts about this claim are lost in a myriad of cross references from one globalist publication to the next. An example of this process goes back to the lead-up to the Iraq war when Cheney fed lies about WMDs to New York Times reporters who then wrote about them so that Cheney could go on Meet The Press and validate his lies by claiming the New York Times wrote about them. That’s how this works. That is part of the point of Wikileaks…

The New York Times chose to write about these 19 missiles (that have never been tested in either North Korea or Iran) in such a way as to be seriously condemning to both countries, yet they provided absolutely no proof, as if some state department internal memo would serve as proof anyway. But clearly the agenda here is being created by the state department.

“GROSS: So were you at those meetings with members of the Obama administration, going over documents, deciding what to publish and what not to?

Mr. SANGER: I was at…

GROSS: Hearing the Obama administration arguments about what not to publish?

Mr. SANGER: I was at some of the meetings at which the Obama administration made some requests. There were no decisions made there. The Times took the requests back and considered them and Bill Keller, our executive editor, and a number of other editors, made the decisions in the end about where they would draw the line. I did hear some of the administration’s concerns along with several of my colleagues and with Dean Baquet, who is our bureau chief here in Washington, and we asked a number of questions so that we understood the nature of the State Department’s concerns, but the decisions were not ours.”

And then…

Mr. SANGER:…But we’ve known for years that Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, many other countries deeply fear that an Iran with a nuclear weapon – even if Iran didn’t use that weapon – would become the most powerful state within the region. And what became clear from the WikiLeaks documents and what really jumped out at us was how explicit they were about those concerns when speaking in confidence to American officials. And in some cases, how explicit they were that the United States should step in with military action if Israel did not, and that was implicit in many of those quotations that you read.”

GROSS: Oh, that’s interesting. And so that’s an example of what you mean by about how it might actually be helpful in some ways to American interests to have disclosed these documents?

Mr. SANGER: It could turn out that way…

So here we have a globalist PR agent working for the New York Times who admits that the Times’ agenda is clearly to help foster our leader’s globalist agenda around the world and he states without reservation that the Obama administration is using Wikileaks to further that agenda through them.

He’s so brainwashed that this doesn’t even strike him as propaganda but instead he simply sees this as his job, his mission, to “explain the world” to Americans and others. Of at least, that is how brainwashed he expects the American people to be at this point.

Wikileaks was always a psyop program from day one. John Young knew that as they were creating it, that’s why he got out and published the emails, so that people would not be suckered in by it.

Wikileaks is serving the greater good of the globalist’s empire interests. Do yourself a favor… don’t download this crap, don’t mirror it. You want real leaks? Go to Cryptome go to What Really Happened go to Information Clearinghouse go to Global Research or go to any other legitimate dissent news sites and leave this Rockefeller/NSA creation alone.

This is their effort to try to legitimize their criminal behavior through a source that the liberal dissenters will trust. This is their effort to explain the world through their perverted perspective in such a way that those of us who reject their complicit mouthpieces will believe and accept the core precepts of their Global War on Terror and all the suffering they are creating in our names. Its obvious and its flawed. You have to be smarter than this, people. You are smarter than this ham-handed sophomoric propaganda.

I am reminded of a section of Orwell’s 1984 (which is not taught in public schools down here in Florida, by the way) in which Winston Smith meets his neighbor, Parsons, while waiting for the broken elevator in their apartment building. Parsons tells Winston how happy he is that the chocolate rations just went up and of course Winston remembers that he just re-wrote the history of chocolate rations setting them lower than they were so that the “news” of an increase in rations would actually mask a decline.

“Chocolate ration. The chocolate ration in 1983 was 30 grams per week. (For comparison, a standard Hershey’s Chocolate Bar is 43 grams) In the year 1984, the chocolate ration went up to 25 grams per week. Winston himself is charged with the task of re-writing history to make this little feat possible.” Newspeak Dictionary

That moment is interesting because even though Smith’s neighbor is seemingly excited about this new ration upgrade, behind his eyes you could see a sadness. It was as if Parsons was in mourning for his own fading reason. His eyes betrayed the lies he wanted so desperately to believe.

Assange is not a hero, Wikileaks is not dissent. And in your mind, you know it, you just don’t want to. If you don’t believe me, just look in the mirror. There is a little Parsons in all of us.

Parsons — Winston’s naïve neighbour and an ideal member of the Outer Party: an un-educated, suggestible man. He is utterly loyal to the Party and believes fully in its image of perfection. He is in a way like the proles, unable to see the bigger aspects of the world. He is active and participates in hikes and leads community group and fundraisers. Despite being a fool, Parsons does possess some good traits. He is a very friendly man and seems to believe in a basic form of decency despite his political views. He punishes his son for firing a catapult at Winston and shows fondness for his children despite his belief that the end of family life is a good idea. He is captured when his children claim that he repeatedly and unknowingly spoke against the Party in his sleep and he is last seen in the Ministry of Love, proud of having been betrayed by his orthodox children.

UPDATE:

“But less than a year ago, the founder of WikiLeaks was officially entertained at a US Embassy cocktail party by one of the very diplomats whose secrets he would soon spill to the world.”

“At the reception, held at the US ambassador’s residence in Reykjavik, Iceland, Mr Assange chatted with Sam Watson, the embassy’s deputy chief of mission.”

“By the time of the party WikiLeaks had also already taken delivery of around 600,000 classified US Army logs from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, released earlier this year, plus the 250,000 secret US embassy cables which it is releasing now.

“I thought it would be a bit boring to go on my own,” said Ms Jonsdottir. “But the irony was that I went to collect him from his guesthouse and couldn’t find him, so just went back to work and didn’t even go myself. I found out later he’d just decided to go on his own and got in by saying he was my guest. He said he’d spent a long time talking to Mr Watson.” The Telegraph

The wrong theater.

.
.
.
.
As per "Cold Start" and actual experience in 1948, 1962, 1965, 1971, 1999 .......and zillions of border skirmishes suggest the real action is on LAND, and more specifically up the mountains.

Submarines and the navy generally since 1947 have seen little or no action, and a quick gaze at the Crystal Ball seems to confirm that they are not likely to see any action in the future either, save as serving as some kind of dubious mascot of India's arrival in the Super Power League status scene. Rather like the last Czar of Imperial Russia spending well over 50% of his military budget on the strategically unimportant navy with its 91,000 personnel, and wholly neglecting the far more important army of 1,200,000.

It is only when the Russian imperial army ill-equipped with poor logistics and supplies suffered devastating losses in 1916, that the Czarist regime collapsed a year later.......THE DEFEAT OF THE ARMY WAS A CATALYST FOR THE HORRIFIC JEWISH BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION SUBSEQUENTLY WHICH EVENTUALLY CLAIMED THE LIVES OF 60 MILLION SOVIETS FROM 1918--1991.

India has been tested by Pakistan, which has one of the worst military's in the world, and India has done reasonably well against them in easy two week spats. But it is ironical that India should now buy over priced hardware from Russia and many other countries instead of investing in domestic production, and focusing greater resources in the army. A C-130 should normally cost about $60 million per plane not $350 million each. Its a very old plane based on a German WWII design, produced since the 1950's. A very simple old plane which should have a simple low price.

However obviously in corrupt Macaulay Brown Sahib India as per the previous copy paste, defense procurement is not PRIMARILY about strategic national requirements but about which babus and netas can make the most money from kick-backs from foreign countries, hence the decades long periods of "tendering" "haggling" from foreign buyers for every major items of purchase. Its a Mela and a ritualized event........the result means:

1) India's arms inventory is 70-80% foreign imported. The USA, China's and Russia's arms inventories are 100% domestic manufactured and designed. To be a reasonably serious POWER India must COPY the USA, China and Russia's policy and investment on domestic production and design only. The remaining arms inventory of India, where domestic production is concerned many of the spares have foreign components........Arjun tank, Tejas planes; so not really domestic in the 100% sense. You cannot fight mass warfare for long periods by relying on a MERE 39 ordnance factories, and foreign suppliers for spares. You cannot do a Nehru in the 1960's begging foreign countries to provide arms and help of whatever shape, and they subsequently don't.....you logically manufacture your own arms....standard or substandard. The T-34 tank was not standard, it had many faults when introduced by the Soviets in 1940, but eventually the problems were ironed out. But the Indian military/babus corrupt complex want PERFECT....WORLD CLASS weapons systems from the get go from DORDO....which of course they can't, deliver.

2) This foreign tendering and purchase means India has a complex mishmash of wholly irrelevant arms from various sources. India has too many different combat planes, tanks and artillery. Useless......unless you want to open a museum.

3) India needs to bolster her ordnance capacity from the current mere 39 factories to about 300--500 actual ordnance factories, and about 10,000 defense related factories employing a few million people....3-5 million. A complete ban on foreign purchases, and greater defense expenditure should meet such targets.

4) India needs to permanently maintain about 700---800,000 men in Kashmir; 200,000 Himachal Pradesh/Uttarakhand; 300,000 men in Arunchal Pradesh; 500,000 Assam; 600,000 near Pakistan in the Punjab, Rajasthan and Gujarat and about 200,000 in other parts of India.......with 2,400,000 regular reserves. Since the Indian military lacks proper logistics, and good infrastructure it makes sense to follow the Rommel doctrine of keeping men in the "VICINITY" of likely future flash points of war. Rommel realized with the experience of fighting 4 years that his sector B lacked proper air-cover with just 550 planes of which 400 were serviceable in the entire Western sector in June 1944(France and the Low countries), and of course poor logistics......3/4 pounds of ration for each German soldier in comparison to 30 pounds daily ration for British troops and 40 pounds daily ration for American troops....limited ammunition, and very limited transports. So instead of wasting time moving men around the battle theater in such a hostile situation he preferred to station his best units, and about 4/5 panzer divisions of the 10 in France near the beaches of Normandy, where he speculated the action could be under his command, besides building formidable, if incomplete defensive systems (In light and and in anticipation of the weaknesses of his forces)........Hitler refused.

5) India THUS REQUIRES substantial new basic field army equipment such as 155mm artillery (5,000---10,000), 120mm mortars which are a must for mountain warfare (10,000---20,000), 23mm, 40mm and 106mm heavy AA guns (15,000--20,000) which are quite easy to manufacture in India, and you don't need to import that many foreign components.....and shells for these equipment. Of course there will be a few sad netas and babus but what can you do when you have to pursue pure national security policy?

6) India needs to secure her borders ON LAND first and foremost, and have a credible ability to defend her sovereignty ON LAND (a modest basic ambition) BEFORE she invests in a blue water navy that projects India's Superpower status further and further away (immodest silly aspiration pushed by Washington and their agents in India).......if in the highly unlikely scenario India is blocked by sea by losing in a few naval engagements, nothing serious will happen if India uses Myanmar, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka as alternative default ports for importing and exporting during war. If India HOWEVER loses a battle or two or the war on LAND then it is the end of the story. Poor Third World nations must make strategic scarce resource choices of where to invest in their defense procurement and strategy. It should be simple and modest and on LAND.......though obviously admitted 120mm mortars, 40mm LAA and 155mm artillery are not that sexy(5) to look at in comparison to say a spanking brand new stealth submarine, or over priced ex-Soviet aircraft carriers.

The Times of India article posted below does a bit of PR for the Neta/babus corruption complex. Hopefully not doing any story plants for the corrupt military Neta complex in India.

I am detached from India, not EVER intending to visit the country and I have no vested interests there or in Switzerland....its purely an intellectual exercise for me (PAST-TIME).

________________________________

Navy retires INS Vagli, India down to 14 subs

Rajat Pandit of the Times of India.

The last of India's Foxtrot-class submarines, INS Vagli, will retire after 36 years of operational service on Thursday. But the well-deserved nostalgia over INS Vagli's yeoman service should come with a harsh reality check.

India is now down to just 14 ageing submarines, with only eight to nine operational at any given time. It will get progressively worse. By the time Navy gets the first of the six Scorpene submarines being built at Mazagon Docks in 2015 — the Rs 23,562-crore project is already running three years behind schedule — only 10 submarines will be operational.

Latest projections, in fact, show India will have only five of the existing 10 Russian Kilo-class and four German HDW submarines by 2020. And only two by 2022.

Even if the six Scorpenes manage to roll out between 2015 and 2020, as is now expected, India will have a grand total of just eight to nine diesel-electric submarines by 2022.

This when the requirement is for at least 18 conventional submarines, with both China and Pakistan rapidly bolstering their underwater combat capabilities.

It, once again, underlines India's sheer lack of long-term strategic planning to systematically build military capabilities in tune with geo-political objectives, despite big bucks being spent on defence acquisitions in recent years.

Corruption

.
.
.
.

Corruption on the rise: 54% Indians paid bribe last year

By TOI

One person in four worldwide paid bribe during the past year while 54 per cent Indians say they greased the palms of authorities to get things done, says a study released today to mark International Anti-Corruption Day.

India is among the countries topping the list for reported bribe payments over the year along with Afghanistan, Cambodia, Cameroon, Iraq, Liberia, Nigeria, the Palestinian territories, Senegal, Sierre Leone and Uganda. More than one person out of two in these countries said they had handed out financial sweeteners to officials.

The 2010 Global Corruption Barometer, by the Berlin-based non-governmental agency Transparency International, focuses on small-scale bribery and was put together from polls conducted among more than 91,000 people in 86 countries and territories.

The study reveals one person in four worldwide paid a bribe during the past year.

In the past 12 months, one in four paid a bribe to one of nine institutions, such as health, education or tax authorities, according to the 2010 Global Corruption Barometer.

But it was the police who proved most corrupt, according to the study which reported that 29 per cent of those having dealings with police said they had paid a bribe.

Worldwide, sub-Saharan Africa was the region reporting the greatest incidence of bribery with more than one person in two saying they had made such payments to officials in the past 12 months.

(strong correlation between bribery and poverty----simply put the poorest nations tend to practice this form corruption the most)

The Middle East and North Africa was the next most corrupt region with 36 per cent of people there reporting having paid a bribe.

This compared to 32 per cent in the former Soviet republics, 23 per cent in South America, 19 per cent in the Balkans and Turkey, 11 per cent in the Asia-Pacific region, and five per cent in the European Union and North America.

Nearly half of the respondents said they paid to avoid problems, while a quarter said it was meant to speed up procedures.

Lower income earners reported paying more bribes than the better paid.

The study, the seventh on the matter by Transparency International since 2003, this time involved a greater number of countries, including for the first time China, Bangladesh and the Palestinian territories.

Polling, mostly by the Gallup Institute, was conducted between June 1 and September 30.

The United Nations established International Anti-Corruption Day in 2003 to raise awareness of graft and promote the global fight against it.

Wikileaks and Spycatcher.....same old story.

.
.
.
.

I have read "Spy Catcher".....and unless you are into that sort of thing its mundane, filled with nothing startling. It gave us "inside" information that any good journalist could produce using secondary sources. The search for the "Fifth man" had been going on for decades, and obviously besides Cairncross, Victor Rothschilds eventually was fingered as the "Fifth Man". Which of course is incorrect objectively, even as a senior spy within British Intelligence.

Communism/Bolshevism/Socialism is a Jewish fiction, an annex or psuedo-Jewish creation. It emerged in the 19th century through Marx, Engels and other Jews with beneficial patronage of the Rothschilds of London. The Rothschilds were at the center of the global Marxist/Communist movement, using their assets and tools in Jew York to fund the Bolshevik Revolution in the Former Czarist Empire from 1917, and then a few other countries we don't need to mention at this stage.

In that light Victor Rothschilds was not a mere "Fifth Man" equal and equivalent to Kim Philby, Guy Burgess, Blunt and ALL the others BUT central to the Communist movement, globally.....and London and the Rothschilds at the center of it. The very same Rothschilds which created the state of Israel using the resources of the British Empire. So than in that historical sense it is very plausible that the same tactics used to shield the Rothschilds in London, are being used to shield Israel and its reprehensible behavior in the International plain, save that it does one better......Wikileaks unlike Spycatcher does not merely attempt to deflect negativity from Israel, and "attack" the UK state, but goes out of its way to promote CENTRAL ISRAELI STATE POLICY.........attack on Iran, Invasion of Pakistan, and the sustaining of all the GWOT myths including the falsehoods of 9/11, and the fake antics of OBL.

It is thus not surprising that Israeli/Likud friendly Assange should be openly propagated, fetted and promoted in the midst of Rothschilds Jew London through a variety of staged ops.

_______________________

ASSANGE'S WIKILEAKS - PETER WRIGHT'S SPYCATCHER

By aangirfan.

Early in 2010, "Assange met with Israeli officials in Geneva" and struck a "secret deal."

Documents about the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza "were removed and possibly destroyed by Assange."

The sources of the report are said to be former WikiLeaks volunteers. (WIKILEAKS STRUCK A DEAL WITH ISRAEL OVER CABLE LEAKS)

According to an Arabic investigative journalism website, Assange received money from semi-official Israeli sources (http://www.syriatruth.info/content/view/977/36/)

In 1987, a British spook called Peter Wright wrote a book called Spycatcher.

This book appeared to give away a number of secrets. But most of the information was old and already known.

The brains behind this book was said to be Lord Victor (Ted) Rothschild. (aangirfan: MI5 and MI6)

Spycatcher diverted attention away from 'evidence that Rothschild had given away secrets to Israel, and Russia'.

Half-hearted attempts to prosecute Peter Wright turned the book into an international bestseller.

There may be similarities here with Julian Assange. (Political risk in making a martyr of Assange The Age - Malcolm Turnbull)

"Lawyers say there are big obstacles to a successful prosecution of WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange.

"His extradition to the US could be more difficult still." (Case against Assange beset with problems‎ - Financial Times)


Victor Rothschild 'stole all major UK/US weapons developments in the Second World War, including the atomic bomb'. Rothschild, 'was involved in so many aspects of spying that he seemed like a super-agent, sabotaging every Western intelligence initiative for 20 years after the war'. (Rothschild 'spied as the Fifth Man' - The Independent)

We are not the only people to be suspicious of Wikileaks.

On 7 December 2010, at oilprice.com, political analyst Claude Salhani asks about WikiLeaks - State Secrets or Clever Tactics?

"Is the US Government Machiavellian enough to orchestrate the recent brouhaha over the so-called website WikiLeaks...?

"I am not one to support conspiracy theories but when you stop to analyze the content of the information that was leaked it seem that two things emerge: first, the content of the cables were not so earth shattering as to damage national security, or harm Washington’s relations with other countries.

"Second, upon further analysis, it would appear that the information revealed instead sends a strong message to America’s foes...

"The question here is who leaked the information and what do they stand to gain from it? If the cables were leaked by the U.S. government, was it to prove that the United States is not the only one to adopt double standard when it comes to Middle East politics?"

Peter Wright's Spycatcher diverted attention away from Lord Victor Rothschild.