Wikileaks and Spycatcher.....same old story.


I have read "Spy Catcher".....and unless you are into that sort of thing its mundane, filled with nothing startling. It gave us "inside" information that any good journalist could produce using secondary sources. The search for the "Fifth man" had been going on for decades, and obviously besides Cairncross, Victor Rothschilds eventually was fingered as the "Fifth Man". Which of course is incorrect objectively, even as a senior spy within British Intelligence.

Communism/Bolshevism/Socialism is a Jewish fiction, an annex or psuedo-Jewish creation. It emerged in the 19th century through Marx, Engels and other Jews with beneficial patronage of the Rothschilds of London. The Rothschilds were at the center of the global Marxist/Communist movement, using their assets and tools in Jew York to fund the Bolshevik Revolution in the Former Czarist Empire from 1917, and then a few other countries we don't need to mention at this stage.

In that light Victor Rothschilds was not a mere "Fifth Man" equal and equivalent to Kim Philby, Guy Burgess, Blunt and ALL the others BUT central to the Communist movement, globally.....and London and the Rothschilds at the center of it. The very same Rothschilds which created the state of Israel using the resources of the British Empire. So than in that historical sense it is very plausible that the same tactics used to shield the Rothschilds in London, are being used to shield Israel and its reprehensible behavior in the International plain, save that it does one better......Wikileaks unlike Spycatcher does not merely attempt to deflect negativity from Israel, and "attack" the UK state, but goes out of its way to promote CENTRAL ISRAELI STATE POLICY.........attack on Iran, Invasion of Pakistan, and the sustaining of all the GWOT myths including the falsehoods of 9/11, and the fake antics of OBL.

It is thus not surprising that Israeli/Likud friendly Assange should be openly propagated, fetted and promoted in the midst of Rothschilds Jew London through a variety of staged ops.



By aangirfan.

Early in 2010, "Assange met with Israeli officials in Geneva" and struck a "secret deal."

Documents about the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza "were removed and possibly destroyed by Assange."

The sources of the report are said to be former WikiLeaks volunteers. (WIKILEAKS STRUCK A DEAL WITH ISRAEL OVER CABLE LEAKS)

According to an Arabic investigative journalism website, Assange received money from semi-official Israeli sources (http://www.syriatruth.info/content/view/977/36/)

In 1987, a British spook called Peter Wright wrote a book called Spycatcher.

This book appeared to give away a number of secrets. But most of the information was old and already known.

The brains behind this book was said to be Lord Victor (Ted) Rothschild. (aangirfan: MI5 and MI6)

Spycatcher diverted attention away from 'evidence that Rothschild had given away secrets to Israel, and Russia'.

Half-hearted attempts to prosecute Peter Wright turned the book into an international bestseller.

There may be similarities here with Julian Assange. (Political risk in making a martyr of Assange The Age - Malcolm Turnbull)

"Lawyers say there are big obstacles to a successful prosecution of WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange.

"His extradition to the US could be more difficult still." (Case against Assange beset with problems‎ - Financial Times)

Victor Rothschild 'stole all major UK/US weapons developments in the Second World War, including the atomic bomb'. Rothschild, 'was involved in so many aspects of spying that he seemed like a super-agent, sabotaging every Western intelligence initiative for 20 years after the war'. (Rothschild 'spied as the Fifth Man' - The Independent)

We are not the only people to be suspicious of Wikileaks.

On 7 December 2010, at oilprice.com, political analyst Claude Salhani asks about WikiLeaks - State Secrets or Clever Tactics?

"Is the US Government Machiavellian enough to orchestrate the recent brouhaha over the so-called website WikiLeaks...?

"I am not one to support conspiracy theories but when you stop to analyze the content of the information that was leaked it seem that two things emerge: first, the content of the cables were not so earth shattering as to damage national security, or harm Washington’s relations with other countries.

"Second, upon further analysis, it would appear that the information revealed instead sends a strong message to America’s foes...

"The question here is who leaked the information and what do they stand to gain from it? If the cables were leaked by the U.S. government, was it to prove that the United States is not the only one to adopt double standard when it comes to Middle East politics?"

Peter Wright's Spycatcher diverted attention away from Lord Victor Rothschild.