.
.
.
It WILL look reflect poorly on the USA if the Israeli PM, belonging to a minority fascist Apartheid party comes to the USA with trumpets hailing, and tells the USA to attack Iran, or even worse follow Israel's lead, and the USA subsequently by deed or words says "Yes sir, when?".
The USA's reputation is on the down, but why accelerate it?
There is no point in punishing and attacking Iran( a former staunch ally) for a nonexistent nuclear bomb program, which has been verified by some very intrusive inspection by the IAEA over the last 9 years.
The Carter administration for all its trans-Atlantic wisdom installed the mullahs into power with certain European help, who subsequently through British guidance expelled ALL American influence in the country (52 hostages held for 444 days).......from 1979. It is just dumb and dumber to then go to war against this original American conspired mess in Iran for no particular good reason, and Likud angst. (5,000,000 educated talented Iranians have left Iran since 1979).
No doubt the Jews and their dumb fuck WASP lackeys in the USA struggling to reach the Jew trough of power and shekels, will give Netanyahu a platform to perform, hyperventilate and show his angst.......but so what?
The USA must control Israel, not the other way round.
DefSec Panetta has clearly stated that the red line for the USA visa vi Iran is if there are clear signs that the country is embarking on nuke bomb programs. And this FACT is subsequently verified by the American intelligence community, thereafter. Not Israel.
Clearly there are issues of national sovereignty here. Who runs American state policy?
The Israelis should thank the USA for bringing into power "al-CIA-duh" in Somalia, Yemen, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and maybe Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Just as Israel has brought Hamas to power in Palestine.
The Jew must be grateful to the USA for services rendered, for the Afghan Heroin trade profits for its banks.
The Jew must be grateful to the USA for killing 2-3 million Iraqis since 1991, and the destruction of the country into 3 sectarian pieces.
The Jew must be grateful to the USA in looking the other way, and not investigating obvious flaws in the official government cover story conspiracy, whilst Israel conducted 9/11 using its fifth column in the USA
To be sure slithery, racist, Apartheid scum are never satisfied, but America for its own survival must draw red lines against Israel.
The USA, to save a lot of trouble must learn to control Israel.....so that it does not blackmail the USA, again, again and again.
___________________________
Will Bibi Break Obama?
by Patrick J. Buchanan at antiwar.comThe prime minister of Israel is angry with Barack Obama and is coming here to force a hardening of U.S. policy toward Iran.
"Bibi" Netanyahu had his anger on display at a meeting in Israel with Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham.
McCain emerged saying he had never seen an Israeli prime minister "that unhappy." "He was angry," said McCain. "I’ve never seen U.S.-Israel relations at this point."
"The Israelis are unnerved," said Graham. "They think the administration is sending the wrong signal, and so do I."
What has so enraged Netanyahu? The Obama policy of tightening sanctions on Iran while holding out the opportunity for Tehran to negotiate and provide guarantees that its nuclear program is not aimed at an atomic bomb.
The U.S. intelligence community unanimously believes that Iran is some time away, perhaps years, from being able to produce a nuclear weapon and has not made the command decision to build one.
Israel retorts that Iran is entering a "zone of immunity," when Israel will lack the ability to attack and abort Iran’s nuclear program, as new nuclear sites are being moved underground. Netanyahu’s government is also angry at what it sees as U.S. leaders’ distancing themselves from Israel.
When that fifth Iranian nuclear scientist was assassinated and Tehran accused America and Israel of complicity, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton denounced the murder, leaving Israel as prime suspect.
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta leaked to columnist David Ignatius that Israel might strike Iran in April, May, or June, leaving no doubt as to who wants a war, while ex-CIA Director Michael Hayden openly disparages Israel’s capacity to cripple Iran’s nuclear sites: "They only have the ability to make this worse."
Adm. William Fallon, who headed U.S. Central Command, has been categorical: "No one I am aware of thinks that there is a positive outcome from a military strike" on Iran.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Martin Dempsey has called Iran a "rational actor" and told the Israelis that for them to attack Iran now would be "premature," "destabilizing," and imprudent.
Netanyahu said that Dempsey’s remarks "served Iran" and the general was "unwilling to aid Israel."
Like Panetta, U.S. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has said he does not believe that Iran has decided to build a bomb, while National Security Adviser Tom Donilon spent three days in Israel, reportedly arguing against an Israeli attack.
"The Israelis are fuming over what they perceive as deliberate attempts by the Obama administration to undermine the deterrent effect of the Jewish state’s threat to use force against Iran by publicly questioning the timing and utility of such strikes." So write Jay Solomon and Carol Lee of The Wall Street Journal.
Netanyahu is coming to Washington, the Journal writers add, to demand that Obama spell out the "red lines" Iran will not be allowed to cross without triggering a U.S. attack.
What Netanyahu wants is a U.S. ultimatum to Iran.
White House sources say that when Obama meets Netanyahu Tuesday, he will reject the prime minister’s demands.
But the pressure to shorten the timetable for war is intense and growing.
Obama will speak Sunday to the annual assembly of the Israeli lobby AIPAC. Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, and Mitt Romney, all more hawkish than the president, have also been invited to address the conclave.
Three dozen senators have signed on to a resolution declaring it a U.S. "vital national interest" that Iran not possess even a "nuclear weapons capability."
S.R. 380 reads like a resolution crafted as a casus belli, a cause for war. For South Korea, Brazil, and Japan all have a "nuclear weapons capability," as all have the industrial proficiency and technical know-how to build an atomic bomb, should they chose to do so.
The resolution demands that Iran halt all uranium production and end its ballistic missile program, and declares "unacceptable" any U.S. policy of containment of an Iran that is capable of building a bomb, even if Iran has decided not to build a bomb.
Containment succeeded with a Soviet Empire with 10,000 nuclear weapons, but is apparently inadequate for dealing with an Iran that has no atom bombs, only the potential to build one.
S.R. 380 points directly toward a U.S. war on Iran.
Who wants that war? Netanyahu, his government, and his allies in U.S. politics and the press, and in a Congress that gave him 29 standing ovations the last time he spoke there.
Who does not want a war?
The White House, the Pentagon, the Joint Chiefs, the intelligence community, the antiwar left and Old Right, ( China, Russia, India and the rest of the world) and millions of Americans who believe a U.S. war on Iran could ignite a sectarian and regional war that could prove catastrophic for the Middle East, the world economy, and the United States of America.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
