.
.
.
It was always a mystery why the USA so aggressively led a campaign of destabilization and terrorism, and verbal violence against the mild meek Assad regime. Syria whilst trying to balance its friendship with Russia tried its best to also accommodate the USA and its Israeli led geo-strategy in the region up to a point.
It was retreating in Lebanon, a country otherwise historically part of Syria and "Al-Shams", and it didn't openly support any terrorist groups either.
But led by Israel, the USA decided that what the region and the world really needed was "al-CIA-duh" around which USA geo-strategy in the whole world would be established. This policy would also project little Israel as an Island of civilization, with their Mossad operatives hyperventilating around the world, purportedly on a noble mission to save other nations from the perils of "Islamic Fundamentalism" and Mossad "cooperation".....India.
According to Russian Intelligence the USA, with the help of its NATO dogs have up to 15,000 armed "al-CIA-duh" terrorists in the country, destabilizing the country. For the USA this is normal fare which has been done millions of times before to other mostly Third World countries, since the days of crypto-Jew Teddy Roosevelt.
The plan is to install the Controlled Opposition 'enemy' al-CIA-duh regime in Damascus, and there after smash the country with the full might of the combined coalition of the USA/NATO/Israel neo-Crusader force.....against the Islamic Hordes of Damascus, based on righteous indignation against yet another de-legitimated compromised regime;............. As was the case with Iran from 1978, Hamas Palestine from 1970's, the Taliban Afghanistan from 1994, Somalia since the 1990's and Yemen since the late 1990's.....and soon Libya, Tunisia and Egypt with ascendant Islamic Brotherhood affiliated parties in power.....but the stench of the Arab Spring is too near for them to be demonized just yet, with the later three. These three have to establish their Islamic credentials, then be appropriately heckled and demonized by the neo-Crusader forces, and then attacked at an opportune time of Israel's choosing.
In that holistic sense American geo-strategy in the world is not American, it is rather written in Israel.......who desires crude "al-CIA-duh" affiliated regimes in ALL Arab regimes, followed by USA/NATO actions against these vile installed puppet regimes.
The challenge for patriotic Americans is to de-conflate Israeli LIKUD geo-strategic objectives with American geo-strategic objectives, and then follow it up with appropriate measures.
What that simply means is USA officials unmistakably contradicting Israeli Likud policy, and rebutting the logic of Tel a Viv in a rational clear manner in the USA media, again, again and again.
_______________________
US Officials: Assad Regime May Survive Syria Revolt
US officials are also starting to admit that the protest movement-turned-armed resistance may not represent the popular will
Top U.S. officials are acknowledging that the violent anti-government revolt in Syria may not represent a majority of the Syrian people and that the regime of President Bashar al-Assad may survive the rebellion.
The admission is significant because U.S. officials have for months referred to the unrest as a popular uprising and publicly called for the end of Assad’s rule, which they claimed was imminent anyhow. President Obama said on Tuesday, ”ultimately, this dictator will fall.”
The Obama administration has made it a matter of policy to aid the Syrian opposition in their quest to overthrow Assad. But that policy will be much more difficult to justify if even U.S. policymakers admit that the opposition fighters represent a small minority of Syrians in a violent civil war.
Despite army defections to the so-called Free Syrian Army and some other bureaucratic defections from Assad’s rule, U.S. officials have anonymously admitted, Assad’s rule remains largely intact. Plus, with continuing military and economic aid from allies like Russia and Iran, the regime appears firmly entrenched, contrary to statements from the Obama administration in recent weeks.
The Obama administration thus far has been reluctant to commit to an actual military campaign against the Assad government, but recent changes in policy began to make it seem like such a campaign was fast approaching. Pushing for regime change in Syria – that is, gaining another strategic foothold in the region and knocking out one of Iran’s main allies – is much harder for them to justify if it can’t be branded as being aligned with the popular will or as some humanitarian mission.
