.
.
.
.
OOPS! NO GAS ATTACK BY ASSAD by aangirfan
The UN and the UK Labour party want to delay any possible action.
A growing number of 'honest' commentators have turned against Obama and Cameron.
Dr Tim Stanley, a historian of the United States, writes in the UK Telegraph:
Dr Tim Stanley writes:
First, we've yet to
ascertain that chemical weapons really were used by Assad – specifically
we've not determined a) what kind of WMDs they were or b) who actually
did it...
Second, why would the Assad regime do something so stupid?
It must know that by using chemical weapons it would isolate itself from
any international support and invite a Western military response.
More importantly, Assad was already winning the war – so why bother to use WMDs during the last lap to victory?
Indeed, the only people who have anything to gain by Assad using
chemicals are the rebels, because that would internationalise the
conflict in a way that they have long lobbied for.
Third, why is the West obliged to act even if Assad did use chemical weapons?
Girl raped and murdered by John Kerry's rebels.
Third, why is the West obliged to act even if Assad did use chemical weapons?
We are not under any such treaty obligations and the subject sure
doesn't feature as a trigger for war in the US constitution...
John Kerry ... We've got one very good reason to doubt his accuracy: Iraq.
Remember that back in 2003, the then US secretary of state, Colin
Powell, told the UN in no uncertain terms that Iraq definitely had
WMDs.
Definitely, definitely, definitely.
~~
brian refers us to the article entitled: Sarin Gas : a new propaganda campaign against Syria
According to VOLTAIRE NETWORK:
According to VOLTAIRE NETWORK:
The YouTube the video evidence of the massacre of August 21st was posted
by the "Majles Rif" account ... the day before, on August 20th .
On these videos, one quickly detects a setup:
1. The wounded children appear haggard or drugged, and do not have parents who accompany them.
2. Boys are often naked, while the girls are all dressed.
3. We see no hospital structure, not even a clandestine one, except screens and pockets of serum.
Some or all of these children may be children kidnapped by the rebels and then killed.
On these videos, one quickly detects a setup:
1. The wounded children appear haggard or drugged, and do not have parents who accompany them.
2. Boys are often naked, while the girls are all dressed.
3. We see no hospital structure, not even a clandestine one, except screens and pockets of serum.
Some or all of these children may be children kidnapped by the rebels and then killed.
