Oct 2, 2008

Pakistan again.




So there has been another couple of American attack against Pakistan killing several civilians and no "al-Qaeda' yet again, after Admiral Mullen assured them on a recent visit to Pakistan that there wouldn't be any further attacks against Pakistan, and confirmed by statements that attacks against Pakistan had ceased for now, from the Pentagon.


Whats going on?

Looks like a power struggle between the 'realists' and the 'empire builders' in the Pentagon and security establishment in the USA. Perhaps the signs of a failing, out going administration that is out of control and clueless. Such contradictions make the Amercan's look bad, and reduces the already low level of trust Pakistanis have in America. Maybe the Americans don't care.

Maybe people in American security have figured that the Democrats will win, and Obama has promised to pursue the mythical "al-Qaeda" into Pakistan, including more ground attacks.....so why cease for a couple of months, when the policy of American attacks will be initiated from January 2009 again, under President Obama. The Democrats are perceived as more pro-India, then pro-Pakistan....though the reality is that the Democrats have done zero for India, but only put out glib superficial meaningless, 'we love you' platitudes. Actually it is under the "pro-Pakistan" Republicans that India has moved closer to the USA security wise. So one can speculate where this relationship will go under the "pro-India" Democrats, who should win the next American elections.

America now has India, who needs Pakistan. The 'lesser' country next to India according to one American official. And in blunt truth this the fact. The Indian economy is 10 times bigger than Pakistan's; militarily 5 times more powerful; is a continuous democracy since 1947; has a better international IMAGE, and finally despite the best efforts of RAW, does not start wars, but does finish them successfully.............Now with Pakistan, you've got a failed state number 9 from the bottom; an ex-felon of 8 years who is president; will do any outlandish security ops in Pakistan's neighborhood (Afghanistan, India) if Sahib requests, without reflection.......a security state out of control......not much good things going for it, except problems, problems, problems, problems, problems, problems, problems,.........and "please shahib, can you give us some money."

Most probably given the behavior of Pakistan's elite and security, the Americans don't respect the Pakistanis and don't give a damn..........the loss of 100 American servicemen in the rational world in one year in Afghanistan should not mean you attack the soveriegn territory of your 'ally' several times killing your 'ally's' civilians mostly. Maybe the Jew through America is desperate to realise his dreams, and Pakistan is in the way of this.

Perhaps in the long term interests of Pakistan that is not such a bad thing of the American attacks..................The chamar needs to be told in an obvious way to get it. There are certain benefits to clarity.....it allows us to adjust our security and foreign policy along more realistic lines. The question is can the ruling elite in Pakistan see the real situation and make adjustments accordingly.

So there is a new intelligence chief, and a new foreign minister in Pakistan. Mean while the economic situation gets worse, as do the political situation. A nation of 175 million that can't feed itself, and has to import foods, but pretends it can. Pretense is the key political game in Pakistan. Just pretend the problem does not exist, and the people will accept it.

Pakistan started off in the words of Jinnah the founder, as a 'Moth eaten' failed state, and will end as one. The only question is when, and how.

A few Pakistanis in the intelligentsia have found that the greatest friends of the country are in reality its greatest enemies, in a Kafkaesque inverted world. The USA, with the UK in toe has over the course of 54 years signed many security and economic agreements with Pakistan, only to find that the relationship turned sour, and acrimonious shortly afterward, resulting in great harm to the country................the destabilization of the Ayub Khan regime by America (1965-69) directly resulted in the breakup of the country for example in 1971.

The ISI, the key institution which is supposed to defend the country, turns out to be the greatest enemy of it, perennially interfering in Pakistani politics, and attempting 'Grand schemes' in Afghanistan and Kashmir, way beyond the resources of an unstable poor Third World failed state. Clearly they have never heard of the statement, "What goes round, comes around", "Reap what you sow".

Many writers and analysts misunderstand. They think by appointing a new ISI chief, things can be changed within the organization. Some writers say, the problem is only with a few rogue elements within the organization, or that the ISI is out of control but the rest of the armed forces are basically sound.

Nothing could be further from the truth. The ISI is the Pakistan armed forces, and the Pak armed forces is the ISI. They are one and the same. Everything the ISI does, has to go through the Pak high command.

Once we have this realization, we than have a better understanding of where Pakistan has gone wrong as a nation. The USA, with the UK through the ISI and senior ranks of the armed forces have together conspired to subvert Pakistan, into the present mess it is now. This is the essence of the problem of Pakistan and is in probability understood by a far greater number of Pakistanis then it may appear apparent at first.

What has America lost in Afghanistan this year? 100 servicemen perhaps..... that's a huge number. America loses ten or twenty times that number during peacetime. So whats going on? Certain sections of America and their Jewish masters want those Pak nukes. Simple.

America defeated the Taliban of 40,000 in 2001, in two months, using the Northern Alliance, and 8,000 American commando's, BUT now they say after 7 years they cannot manage the remnants of the 8,000 Taliban with an actual combined Afghan and coalition security force of 300,000 plus. The Americans say the 100 or so casualties of American servicemen THIS YEAR is too much for the country to handle...........the casualty rate is too high.

This does not sound plausible....or logical, and can only be a Jew deception by the Americans. They are after something, and have another agenda............the 30 year Israeli quest for the Pakistan nuclear bombs, seems to be the main target. The Americans have done many negatives things to Pakistan in the last 30 years in the service of this Israeli goal. De-stabilization of Pakistan through the TTP, and ISI attacks against Pakistan seems to be part of this program.

Gilani is right, the attacks by America within sovereign Pakistani territory is terrorism....it is inexcusable..........he is using the correct words, not more political semantics and deception. Now the next thing the PM and media in Pakistan need to say is that the Pakistan army is not fighting for GWOT, as there never was any real al-Qaeda, but the Pak army is fighting American trained and backed terrorists to destabilise Pakistan..................such a statement will have greater meaning and concensus for ordinary Pakistanis, rather than if they are told they are fighting "terrorists" FOR America.

The key role the ISI facilitates for the Americans is to build a narrative which states that Pakistan is an unstable failed state, with large number of Taliban and al-Qaeda operating out of Pakistan, and attacking American forces.............this is a false narrative, which the ISI, and thus Pak armed forces have foolishly aided. They do not understand that by doing this they lose soveriegnty of their country...and that it is not in Pakistan's best interests to support such lies.