This is an article written by a Pakistani journalist who also works for the government run PTV. He has good contacts in the ISI, and generally his articles put the blame of Pakistan's problems usually on everybody else except the Pakistanis themselves, and especially avoids criticism of the all powerful military/ISI....and hence the reason why he is a journalist and also a TV presenter in the country. He purports to have Arab ancestry.
_______________________________________________
"America's War, Not Ours"
By Ahmed Quraishi
(The war in Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia, with looming open war against Pakistan under President Barack Obama in 2009, and GWOT in general is not so much an American war, but a Jewish war, to give Israel supremacy in the Greater Middle East...........So Pakistan is an "ally" of America in a Jewish war against Islam. That's why Mr. Quraishi the wars raging currently are in 3 Muslim countries, and why the others threatened with war are Muslim: Pakistan, Iran, Syria and Lebanon, in the Greater Middle East in general, to facilitate Eretz Israel.
The main facilitators/enablers of this policy within Pakistan have been the Pakistan military/ISI. Why? How does this benefit Pakistan? How does siding with this Jewish supremacist policy improve Pakistan's security? Well Mr. Quraishi since you have greater channels to this sorry bunch, you had better ask them.)
02/10/09 "ICH" -- A little noticed but major flaw in the Pakistan-US partnership in the war on terror is leading Pakistani policymakers and public opinion to make a serious error in judgment that could devastate Pakistan's stability and leave us looking like another close U.S. ally: Iraq.
(There is no Pakistan-USA partnership, more of a master servant relationship. Simple recent example is the way the ISI chiefs were reorientated at the behest of the USA. Acha Sahib! What ever you say saar!
And there you go again, like the true Jew propaganda mouthpiece you talk about GWOT, like so many other mainstream government journalists in Pakistan.........you of all people should know that al-Qaeda is a fake front of Western and Israeli intelligence, an open secret amongst people who write about such things.
The Taliban were created in 1994 at the insistence of the USA (Jewish dominated Clinton administration) via the Pakistan military/ISI and Benazir Bhen. You see Mr. Quraishi, once we have the courage to say clearly and loudly, that the whole premise of GWOT is fake without any ambiguity and that it is a vehicle to further Israel's geo-strategy through America, then we can begin to question the overall American led strategy to fight "al-Qaeda" and the Taliban for the next 100 years, and the Jew desire to take the fake GWOT war into Pakistan on false pretenses, and secure the Pak nukes for Israel.
If you continue supporting the fake GWOT argument as a Pakistani journalist then it is harder for you to oppose American policy against Pakistan in general.
As to Iraq being an ally of the USA? When? The 1958 military coup replaced the British puppet monarchy, and the military men were not that well disposed to the USA. Since the 1960's you have the Ba'athists in power.......a secular Socialists party, which looked more to the Soviet Union then the USA. There are rumors that Saddam was an American spy, who was maneuvered into power by them......but officially Iraq was pro-Soviet Union. The vast majority of Iraq's arms until 2003 were from the Soviet Union, very little from the USA....in fact nothing. If you want to find out with which country a Third World country has good relations just look at their arms inventory.
From the mid-1980's America started developing a relationship with Iraq, with the Americans providing satellite images of Iranian troop movements, but still no arms transfers. So from 1980-1990 Iraq was not an ally of the USA, but there was some "cooperation". From 1991-2003 the USA was openly hostile imposing sanctions against Iraq, and starving 1 million Iraqis to death. Since 2003 Iraq has been occupied by the USA, and 1.2 million Iraqis have died and 4 million are now refugees. The Iraqis have no choice but to accept this American occupation of their country, invaded under false pretenses........but Iraq most certainly is not an "ally" of the USA.
Iraq can never be an ally of the USA, because of the problems related to the Jewish psyche based on "historical vengeance"......The enslavement of the Israelite's into Babylon and the perennial narrative of suffering associated with that country into Jewish self image and history.
The 3,000 year old Talmudic North African Jewish "religion" is a strange and evil "religion" that has vengeance at the center of it; historical vengeance that is reflective............think of the great Jewish holidays like Purim, a holiday that celebrates the mass genocide of other non-Jewish people, including women and children, through Jewish schemes. Judaism is the only "religion" in the world which has vengeance, and genocide at the center of it's teachings; think about that. When you understand this "religion" then you will understand real Israeli policy, and which in turn will help you explain the intricacies of American foreign policy and why Mesopotamia, Assyria, Babylon Iraq can never be an ally of Jewish controlled USA.
The Likes of you, and Ahmed Rashid and all the rest are purveyors of Jewish propaganda, and it is not that difficult to see why)
This error in judgment is simple but easily overlooked: Pakistan did not take part in occupying Afghanistan (in November 2001, good to see that you are referring to the situation as it really is, an occupation which is proving to be very harmful for the Afghan people; a failed narco state tacitly run with glee by the USA).
( Pakistan did not participate in the occupation of Afghanistan, but was never the less a role player in providing sanctuary to the remnants of the Taliban, and its leaders since 2001...Mulla Omar et al. Pakistan has been a "role player" in Afghanistan since the 1970's at the behest of the Americans, arming the Mujaheddin and then later the Taliban. Whilst Pakistan's role has been considerably reduced since 2001, Pakistan being a neighbor of Afghanistan, and the enabler of the Taliban and al-Qaeda myth can't "opt-out" just like that, as an intricate narrative which has been created by the Jew to ensnare Pakistan in the Afghanistan quagmire......or did the Pakistan generals think the Americans Jews were supporting Pakistan's adventurous policies into Afghanistan to make Pakistan bigger and stronger and give the country strategic depth?
For Pakistan to opt-out of the Afghanistan quagmire and create a clear demarcation line between the two states, the Pakistan military and political elite have to create an alternative narrative to GWOT, and start seriously debunking the mythical al-Qaeda organization.......otherwise you can't separate yourself off from the false GWOT narrative which says Pakistan is some how intricately involved:
Tell the world OBL died a long time ago....then it exposes the fake OBL videos since 2002.
Tell the world that al-Qaeda does not exist, its a fake front organisation and the justification of Western and Israeli intelligence ops.
Lets call the terrorists in FATA and the NWFP in general by what they really are; American backed terrorists out to destabilize Pakistan.
Close the American military bases.
Send the foreign security people in Pakistan back to their countries.
Stop taking American military aid, up to $1.2 billion a year fighting the terrorists. Deal with them using Pakistan's own resources.)
The war to sustain that occupation and prolong it is not Pakistan's war. It never was.
( But it has become Pakistan's war because of Pakistan's association with America........why take $1.2 billion each year............what for? It certainly is not in Pakistan's interest to see the Coalition forces stay in that sorry country too long.....because then Afghanistan becomes a launching pad for attacking Pakistan in the future, and we are now seeing initial engagements through the:
1) TTP and others.
2) Drone attacks/over flight over Pakistani territory.
3.) Predator attacks.
4) Ground attacks.
5) False flag terrorist incidents inside Pakistan.
6) Destabilisation of Pakistani regime( Musharaf)
7) Destabilisation of the Pakistan economy.
8) Creating of a false narrative through the Jewish media which says that Pakistan is unstable, and harbors the mythical al-Qaeda, and arms the Taliban, and cannot be trusted to safeguard the Nuke bombs.
9) Creating a false narrative through the Jewish media that the Americans are seriously challenged in Afghanistan, and the loss of 100 servicemen this year is the end of the world for America and requires America to attack a sovereign neighboring country and "ally", and kill their civilians. That ALL the attacks inside Afghanistan originates from FATA alone.........American commanders in Afghanistan have stated to Congress that about 30-40% of attacks in Afghanistan come from the outside........so in reality poor FATA maybe responsible for only about 20% of the attacks against Coalition and Afghan government forces in Afghanistan.
10) The USA has been at war with Pakistan since 2007 at least, and the Jew is waiting for Obama, he with the Muslim middle name, to be elected as President. Then the Jew can say "our Shiddi president with the Muslim name, is not anti-Muslim, or anti-Brown people...we are doing this for the sake of the world"
After such incidents, if you still call the USA an 'ally' Mr. Quraishi as an 'informed journalist' who has a close ear to the government, then what you need is a good kick up the backside.
All these things are to test the Pakistan military, and the level of outrage and reaction of the military men in Pakistan............these are the classic signs and a precursors to a major future attack (In military parlance: probing attacks)..............Psychologically and practically are the Pakistan military ready for war against the USA?)
For President Zardari's government to 'own' this war at US behest is not only illogical but it also shifts the responsibility of stabilizing Afghanistan onto Pakistan's shoulders. In a worst case scenario, if anything goes wrong, this 'Pakistani ownership' can and will be used later to force a variety of foreign military interventions in Pakistan, as part of the war on terror or to protect our allegedly endangered nukes. This is why Islamabad needs to officially leave the coalition that occupies Afghanistan and squarely pin the responsibility for Afghanistan on the US.
(Yes, yes, exactly..........but do the military men have this foresight?)
This delineation is important because the Pakistani war is limited to our border regions and against criminal groups masquerading as the 'Pakistani Taliban'. It is not Pakistan's war or responsibility to stamp out the Afghan opposition and resistance groups that thrive inside Afghanistan and may sometimes enter Pakistani territory to seek support from tribes with whom they share ethnicity. It is not our responsibility that Washington and its puppet Karzai regime have failed or are unwilling to bring the disgruntled Afghans on board and end the civil war.
( Quite right, it is not Pakistan's responsibility. The fact that Afghanistan is a failed narco-state, where the vast majority of Afghans are unhappy with the foreign occupiers is not Pakistan's responsibility........the fact that perhaps 100 American servicemen have died in Afghanistan this year is not Pakistan's responsibility)
The question of alleged support from Pakistan to the Afghan Taliban, the 'sanctuaries', and the 'rogue intelligence' theory is all secondary if Washington decides today to talk to Afghan opposition groups, including the Afghan Taliban, and offers them a share in ruling their country. If this happens, the question of Pakistani support for Afghan insurgency will become obsolete since there will be no insurgency to support. This is the crux: reconciliation in Afghanistan will end the Afghan opposition's need for sanctuaries anywhere. What is happening right now is that Mr Karzai and the former Northern Alliance are refusing to bring Afghan opposition on board and instead are pushing US to a war with Pakistan to settle old scores.
( No my friend, you misinform your readers, by giving Karzai too much credit. Karzai, the "mayor of Kabul" is a weak, corrupt ineffectual leader...read Bahlol Lodhi's articles posted on this blog..........Karzai actually cried when British officials talked to him about the situation in Afghanistan. That is why the Americans and British love him, and sustain him in power for so many years despite the appalling situation in Afghanistan............he is the last person on earth who could manipulate the Americans..........its the other way round. He is an ex-Unicol executive brought into power by the Americans, and guarded by the Americans as local Afghans can't be trusted.
From the American perspective there are no problems in Afghanistan; they are making huge profits from the narcotics trade a lot of which incidentally runs through Pakistan. What certain sections of the Coalition in Afghanistan want is greater incursions into Pakistan, to destabilize Pakistan and get at the Pak nukes...........and you can ask who is manipulating the Americans in Afghanistan on this policy. Note the difference between what the Pentagon and Mullen said on his visit to Pakistan, and the actions of the Coalition in Afghanistan against Pakistan....clearly there isn't a consensus. There is a major debate going on, and that is good, within the Pentagon and security establishment.
What Pakistan has to do is identify the Jews in the Coalition forces in Afghanistan, amongst many other things. The blurry confusing contradictory 'Alliance' between Pakistan and America cannot last and Pakistan would do well to end it quickly.)
Eliminating Afghan resistance could have become "Pakistan's war" if our American friends, after taking over Kabul, accommodated their Pakistani ally's legitimate interests in Afghanistan, understood Islamabad's valid strategic concerns, and rewarded it for taking a difficult decision: ditching an ally in Kabul in a country that remained hostile throughout the Cold War.
(America was never a friend of Pakistan. Pakistan is a brown people country, founded on the basis of Islam. Pakistan's military/ISI was used by America to create the al-Qaeda myth, Pakistan's military/ISI's role being indispensable in this, and the Taliban...the regional bogeyman whom the Americans must forever pursue into other countries....again created with the indispensable Pakistani military/ISI help. In that sense the Americans don't give a fuck what Pakistan needs or wants, at the present juncture. Pakistan served a purpose.....and in American parlance has been suckered.
Having said this the Americans I believe have written off $8 billion?????? of the Pakistani national debt, and have given Pakistan perhaps $12 billion since 2001.................that's a lot of compensation for 'losing' Afghanistan. Assuming Afghanistan was Pakistan's to own in the first place, using what, extremist medieval Taliban which even the Islamic Iranian regime called a bunch of dinosaurs.Did Pakistan actually think putting the Taliban into power in Afghanistan would be safe for Pakistan? That there might not be some blow back?
Pakistan and Afghanistan should have been one nation in the 1950's, and such moves were made by both Pakistanis and Afghans, in a federated arrangement with the Afghan king being king of all the parts. Negotiations broke down in the late 1950's and the two Pathans Ayub Khan and Ayhya Khan never pursued the matter...until it was re-ignited by the Americans of all people through the Mujaheddin in the late seventies, Islamic extremists, and a possible KGB agent Gulbuddin Hekmatyar...and later the Taliban.
Now federation between the two states will be difficult as the Jew with his grand designs has arrived in the locality, and Iran, India and Russia also have a say in what is going on here.
Afghanistan through Pakistan/USA/Israel has become "internationalised", which restricts obviously what Pakistan can do with Afghanistan in the future.
In my honest opinion the Pakistani state does not seem to have a cohesive long term strategic policy for the country.......it seems to be ad hoc)
What ultimately happened is that everyone in the region was allowed a bite of the Afghan pie except Pakistan. Almost all major players – US, NATO, Iran, India, and others – were allowed to secure their interests except Islamabad.
( Natural and logical outcome of 9/11 which the Jews carried out........now in Afghanistan they have a base with which to attack Pakistan, and secure the Pak nukes for Israel)
Pakistan could have swallowed this insult if Washington kept Afghanistan to itself, but the reality is that the Bush White House ceded crucial space in Afghanistan to India, while keeping Pakistan out.
( There we go again, into India bashing, typical ISI stale talking point narrative. India despite requests has not sent any troops into Afghanistan, and has been very constructive in rebuilding Afghanistan. India is still a bit player in Afghanistan compared to the actual role of the USA and UK..........but the effort to keep Pakistan out of Afghanistan is a calculated one of course by the Jews........The Pakistan military/ISI helped them get into Afghanistan, and now Pakistan is no longer needed.
The Jew game plan is to get the Pakistanis and Indians fighting each other, through the ISI and RAW, and false flag ops. Mr. Quraishi when you repeat these anti-India rants, when everybody in Pakistan should know that the biggest and only power acting aggressively against Pakistan is the USA, for Israel, then you too are contributing to the false Jewish narrative.)
Even mildly Pakistan-friendly Afghanistan elements were not accepted in the power structure in Kabul. And now Afghan soil is being used by third parties to export terrorism into Pakistan and destabilize the country. If this American lapse was unintentional, then it shows US ineptitude. But circumstantial evidence indicates that Pakistan was probably part of the expanded US agenda following 9/11, which included invading Iraq, toppling the regimes of Syria and Iran and redrawing the map of the wider Middle East, including Pakistan.
( That is the ultimate goal: Bush informed Blair about this in a secret discussion in January 2003, leaked memo by two brave conscientious British government officers, but the plan has been stalled due to the Iraqi resistence, and Hezbollah's performance in 2006.......the plan CLEARLY is still there, but with a delayed trajectory, and the Jews have not given up it seems, and the contradictory statements of what the American senior officials say and what the Americans do in Afghanistan against Pakistan is part of this broad narrative and struggle within America.
Incidentally do watch the Hollywood propaganda war movie, "Black Hawk Down" (2001)....see how the movie mentally and subliminally conditions Americans into fighting more wars for the vile filthy Jew in other peoples countries......and the Pakistanis are portrayed as unreliable "allies" in a coalition which incidently contained many many foreign forces. The Pakistanis who shed their blood for America in Somalia as peace keepers.
In the Jewish cryptic message scene which the ISI is involved and familiar with(Marriot Hotel), Somalia is Pakistan (ha! ha! ha!-------Indic 70%, Aryan 30%), destabilized and infiltrated by American backed Islamic fundamentalists like the TTP, a failed state............and Ethiopia is India, helping American geo-strategy, and if persuaded enough invading Pakistan (The nuclear Deal).....ha! ha! ha!(Indic 70%, Aryan 15%, other 15%)
2009......If Obama becomes President in America, and the BJP comes to power in India. Then a joint attack against Pakistan is forseeable. Occupation of Pakistan.......the 50 Pakistan nuke bombs cannot do anything against the Americans, as much as Saddam's WMD's in 1991 proved worthless against the American's. End of Pakistan. Foreign occupation.............The Jews want to use India against Pakistan also.
And if Pakistan is occupied you can be sure that there will be Iraqi style civil war to control, manage and divide the country by the occupiers, using the "El Salvador option".....in addition to securing the Pak nukes......and on the scale of Iraq, 15---20 million Pakistani refugees in India, with the women selling their "Pudee" for 1 rupees to local Indians. Iran, China and Afghanistan cannot manage significant influx's of Pakistani refugees after a civil war, so it will be India's privilege and duty.
That is why I have stated many many times Pakistan needs to sign an FTA with India asap, and legalize the LOC. Reorientate the Pakistan military away from India into defending the Western part of the country. It will look silly if American forces pour into Pakistan, whilst the Pakistan armed forces still have their bayonnets fixed against India.
After all it is about preserving and defending what Pakistan already has.
I have said these things for several years and it is for the Pakistanis to make their own judgments based on the what is going on in reality.
But dear brothers and sisters do consult and see what American occupation, with Israeli advisors, really means for most Iraqis....educate yourself.
And on the other hand one hopes the Aryans of India do not behave like Ethiopians.....and although the breakup of Pakistan may look good for India theoretically on paper and in meetings......its the consequences and the fine detail one has to think about after.
I am confident that wisdom will previal, and that South Asia will decisively and quickly unite economically and militarily to thwart outside schemes in the region, and avoid the situation of Iraq.......it has never been been tried before, and we should give it a chance NOW.......but not by 2020 friends, but now.
A fire in Pakistan is a uncontrollable fire in the "house of South Asia". South Asia is one entity)
Instead of taking on a nuclear Pakistan head on, we were effectively used to occupy Afghanistan and then gradually, starting 2004, the noose was tightened around us. It began with the nuclear proliferation issue and then moved on to a new threat, the safety of our nukes. Interestingly, the 'Pakistan-is-another-Iraq' theory and the nuclear scare were both exclusively started and hyped by the US media, with dramatic pressure-building tactics similar to what was done in the run up to Iraq invasion.
( The problems America faces in Afghanistan because of FATA is just that hype, Jewish media propaganda........the Americans have lost about 100 servicemen this year in Afghanistan.............not something to get over excited about, or as a justification to attack the soveriegn territory of an "ally' repeatedly and willfully killing their citizens......this is a great crime and terrorism against Pakistan by America for the Jews.)
For the growing chorus in the liberal sections of the Pakistani media that wants to 'own' this war, we must understand this: the occupation of Afghanistan and the elimination of Afghan resistance groups is not Pakistan's war. Our war is limited to the insurgencies raging from Gwadar to the Chinese border with partial malicious support from the Afghan soil. This war can be won. Making Pakistan 'own' America's war in Afghanistan and shifting to it to our tribal belt will exacerbate the insurgencies and could destabilize Pakistan beyond the point of return.
(Yes........a lot of the media in Pakistan is foreign controlled and they parrot the lines of their foreign masters without questioning the official American narrative about what is really going on in Afghanistan and Pakistan)
