Oct 26, 2012

"al-CIA-duh"

.
.
.
.

The bizarre fake war on terror by using "al-CIA-duh" to fight and replace peaceful regimes ........against which later the USA then comes in to directly liberate......benefits nobody EAST/WEST save a few faggots in security, who are aligned to Israel and the arms lobby.

They represent a very small section of civilized society.

"al-Qaeda" exists and it doesn't exist.

"al-CIA-duh" the global terrorist group with an independent leader, organization and a global plan to take over the world, with 5000 Ak-47 armed members in 2001...... Hollywood 007 Ernst Stavro Blofled style OBVIOUSLY never existed.

There are however 1000's upon 1000's of Young Islamists mainly from the Middle East, who have been trained by the CIA to fight "Jihad" in theaters that are deemed suitable for CIA/State Department geostrategy.....

Bosnia

Kosovo

Afghanistan....fighting the Soviets initially

Iraq.....to give the image that Iraq is an unmanageable mess that can't be controlled by the good Americans, and "al-CIA-duh's" presence acts as a convenient cover for American genocide, and war crimes. Wars for Israel.

Somalia.......resources wars

Mali......resource wars

Yemen....strategic geographic war

Libya......resource wars, or wars for Israel

Syria.......war for Israel

Russia......resource wars; geo-strategic wars(Southern Russia.....which spreads to the rest of Russia, via the globalist compliant Puppet Putin regime)

Central Asia.....resource wars.

To say the least "al-CIA-duh" is very active in many countries, directed by the CIA/State Department.

"al-CIA-duh" seems to particular types of Americans in particular positions to be VERY USEFUL.

An article in the Guardian states that this type of game by the USA will continue for many more years in the future, using "al-CIA-duh".........what a bleak desolate future for the rest of the world if this is truly so!

Why do these "sand niggers", and "towel heads" work with the CIA/State Departments peculiar policies that favor others, but not them?

There are idiots every where...there are idiots in modern Canada, even Sweden and also in poor illiterate Arab states....idiot people do idiot things, that would seem irrational to most civilized people.

The Arab idiot is not aware that he is working for the CIA/State Department since the idiots handler/manager is most probably another Arab.

The idiot has been indoctrinated in Wahabism/Salafism...which are heretical spurious branches of Islam (Mormons, Jehovah's witness, Rev Moon)......by committing crime against innocents he will go to heaven, and so he has been promised by a Saudi government mullah.

The idiot is in jail for some petty crime, and has been told he can have a life changing experience if he joins "al-CIA-duh"...see the world for free, and become a hero.

The idiot is on drugs, and has been brainwashed.

The idiot is poor and destitute, and half starved...and the CIA/State Department handlers in the guise of an Arab manager says his life will have meaning and financial means if he joins "al-CIA-duh". The idiot is made to feel he is somebody, who belongs to something finally....an identity, and rational for life's complicated questions, and problems.

There are no shortage of idiots......and the idiot policies must continue.

What is required is the demise of the USA as an empire which wants Full Spectrum Control of the world with its present 1000 military bases, AND THE RISE AND ASSERTION OF THE POWER OF CHINA, in place of the USA.

An Asian power, with a civilization that stretches back 5000 years leading the world will be good for everybody......as long as it does not become too emotional about a few pieces of inconsequential rocks in the sea.

This is where hope for the world lies.

Though we understand that idiots also exist in China who have been "Americanized"

_____________________________________________

2007-2008 US West Point reports reveal Al Qaeda network behind NATO's so-called "freedom fighters." Extremists in Syria were behind Iraq War foreign terrorist influx, not Syrian government.
by Tony Cartalucci

  The discredited and now obscure, defected Syrian ambassador Nawaf Fares, had claimed mid-summer of 2012 that the Syrian government had been behind the influx of foreign terrorists that entered Iraq during the later phases of the US-British occupation of Iraq. 
These terrorists took part in campaigns of sectarian-driven violence that divided and destroyed an already devastated Iraq. 
  
(In fact Tony the sectarian violence was directed by USA/UK to create an "Salvador Option" scenario.......whereby control is maintained by death and destruction of the Occupied Territory.....I believe Genghis Khan also followed this policy in China, and Khorasan.....the locales are so overawed by the fighting, that they eventually submit to the occupier. 
But of course all of this barbarity was entirely unnecessary given that most Iraqis welcomed the invasion initially in 2003. It is ONLY when bad faith of the occupier came into play {Destroying the country because Israel required it}....and dominant Sunni were going to lose their traditional perch, that some resistance by the peoples militia was offered in Sunni areas..........American occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan has been characterised by bad faith, severe corruption by greasy fat Americans....taking Iraqi petro-$ and USA taxpayer money meant for reconstruction into shady foreign banks in the Gulf MAINLY....poor reconstruction efforts.....overt American militarism in civilian areas, and provocation which were designed to illicit negative response......probably the death and destruction was some sort of racist Carthasis for 9/11, and getting even with the Ay-rab rag heads)
Fares spectacularly claimed that he himself was involved in organizing terrorist death squads in a hamhanded attempt to implicate the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

What Fares actually revealed however, was an invisible state within Syria, one composed of Saudi-aligned, sectarian extremism, operating not only independently of the government of President Assad, but in violent opposition to it. This "state-within-a-state" also so happens to be directly affiliated with Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, the leading forces now fighting in Syria with significant Western-backing against the Syrian government.


The documented details of this invisible terror state were exposed in the extensive academic efforts of the US Army's own West Point Combating Terrorism Center (CTC). Two reports were published between 2007 and 2008 revealing a global network of Al Qaeda affiliated terror organizations, and how they mobilized to send a large influx of foreign fighters into Iraq.


Image: Cover of the US Army's West Point Combating Terrorism Center report, "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq." The report definitively exposed a regional network used by Al Qaeda to send fighters into Iraq to sow sectarian violence during the US occupation. This exact network can now be seen demonstrably at work with NATO support, overrunning Libya and now Syria. The terrorists in the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi that US Ambassador Stevens was arming, is described by the 2007 West Point report as one of the most prolific and notorious Al Qaeda subsidiaries in the world. 
....

The first report, "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq," was extensively cited by historian and geopolitical analyst Dr. Webster Tarpley in March of 2011, exposing that NATO-backed "pro-democracy" rebels in Libya were in fact Al Qaeda's Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), listed by the US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf) as an international terrorist organization.

The West Point report exposed Libya as a global epicenter for Al Qaeda training and recruitment, producing more fighters per capita than even Saudi Arabia, and producing more foreign fighters than any other nation that sent militants to Iraq, except Saudi Arabia itself.  


Image: Libya, despite its relatively small population, came in second overall, producing foreign fighters to wage sectarian war in Iraq. Libya exceeded all other nations per capita in producing foreign fighters, including Al Qaeda's primary patrons, Saudi Arabia. These diagrams were produced by West Point's Combating Terrorism Center, on pages 8 and 9 of its "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq" report. 
....

But Libya's foreign fighters weren't drawn equally from across the nation. They predominately emanated from the east (Cyrenaica), precisely where the so-called 2011 "pro-democracy revolution" also began, and where most of Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi's attention had been focused over the course of at least three decades, fighting militant extremists. The cities of Darnah, Tobruk, and Benghazi in particular fielded the vast majority of foreign fighters sent to Iraq and also served as the very epicenter for the 2011 violent, NATO-backed uprising.

Image: (Left) West Point's Combating Terrorism Center's 2007 report, "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq" indicates that the vast majority of Al Qaeda terrorists arriving in Iraq from Libya, originated from the country's eastern region, and from the cities of Darnah and Benghazi in particular. (Right) A map indicating rebel held territory (red) during Libya's 2011 conflict. The entire region near Benghazi, Darnah, and Tobruk served as the cradle for the so-called revolution. The US government is just now revealing the heavy Al Qaeda presence in the region, but clearly knew about it since at least as early as 2007, and as other reports indicate, decades before even that. 
....

Clearly, the US military and the US government were both well aware of the heavy Al Qaeda presence in Cyrenaica since as early as 2007. When violence flared up in 2011, it was clear to many geopolitical analysts that it was the result of Al Qaeda, not "pro-democracy protesters." The US government, its allies, and a complicit Western press, willfully lied to the public, misrepresented its case to the United Nations and intervened in Libya on behalf of international terrorists, overthrowing a sovereign government, and granting an entire nation as a base of operations for the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).

A similar scenario is now playing out in Syria, where the West, despite acknowledging the existence of Al Qaeda in Benghazi, Libya, is using these militants, and the exact same networks used to send fighters to Iraq, to flood into and overrun Syria. This, after these very same Libyan militants were implicated in an attack that left a US ambassador dead on September 11, 2012.


Image: Libyan Mahdi al-Harati of the US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terrorist organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), addressing fellow terrorists in Syria. Harati is now commanding a Libyan brigade operating inside of Syria attempting to destroy the Syrian government and subjugate the Syrian population. Traditionally, this is known as "foreign invasion." 
....

LIFG terrorists are veritably flooding into Syria from Libya. In November 2011, the Telegraph in their article, "Leading Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group," would report:

Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, "met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey," said a military official working with Mr Belhadj. "Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan president) sent him there." 
Another Telegraph article, "Libya’s new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels," would admit
Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya's new authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and money for their insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad's regime, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included Turkish officials, the Syrians requested "assistance" from the Libyan representatives and were offered arms, and potentially volunteers.
"There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria," said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of anonymity. "There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you will see."
Later that month, some 600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to begin combat operations and have been flooding into the country ever since.

Image: (Left) West Point's Combating Terrorism Center's 2007 report, "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq" also indicated which areas in Syria Al Qaeda fighters filtering into Iraq came from. The overwhelming majority of them came from Dayr Al-Zawr in Syria's southeast, Idlib in the north near the Turkish-Syrian border, and Dar'a in the south near the Jordanian-Syrian border. (Right) A map indicating the epicenters of violence in Syria indicate that the exact same hotbeds for Al Qaeda in 2007, now serve as the epicenters of so-called "pro-democracy fighters."
....

In Syria, the southeastern region near Dayr Al-Zawr on the Iraqi-Syrian border, the northwestern region of Idlib near the Turkish-Syrian border, and Dar'a in the south near the Jordanian-Syrian border, produced the majority of fighters found crossing over into Iraq, according to the 2007 West Point study.

These regions now serve as the epicenter for a similar Libyan-style uprising, with fighters disingenuously portrayed as "pro-democracy" "freedom fighters." These are also the locations receiving the majority of foreign fighters flowing in from other areas described in the 2007 report, mainly from Saudi Arabia via Jordan, and from Libya, either directly, through Turkey, or through Egypt and/or Jordan.


Image: The most prominent routes into Syria for foreign fighters is depicted, with the inset graph describing the most widely used routes by foreign fighters on their way to Iraq, as determined by West Point's 2007 Combating Terrorism Center report "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq" (page 20).  These same networks are now being used, with the addition of a more prominent role for Turkey, to target Syria directly. (Click to enlarge)
....

The 2007 West Point report also describes the routes taken by the fighters entering Iraq. The most prominent routes by far were from Syria itself, the Libya-Egypt-Syria route, the Saudi Arabia-Syria route, and the Saudi Arabia-Jordan-Syria route. These routes are clearly being used yet again, only this time, instead of sowing sectarian violence and destabilization in Iraq, these foreign fighters, with NATO backing, are targeting Syria directly.
Subversion of Syria was Planned by the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia in 2007.

While many Western  think-tank documents, including the joint US-Israeli "
Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," recognized Syria as a threat to corporate-financier hegemony throughout the Middle East and beyond, it wasn't until at least 2007 that a fully articulated plan was developed for actually rolling back or eliminating Syria as a viable, independent nation-state.

The specific use of Al Qaeda-affiliated militant organizations, not just inside Syria, but from across the region was a key component of the plan,  revealed by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh in his 2007 New Yorker report titled, ""
The Redirection: Is the Administration's new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?"

In the report it specifically stated:


"To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coƶperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda." -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007) 
Hersh's report would continue by stating: 
"the Saudi government, with Washington’s approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir Assad, of Syria. The Israelis believe that putting such pressure on the Assad government will make it more conciliatory and open to negotiations." -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
The link between extremist groups and Saudi funding was also mentioned in the report, and reflects evidence presented by the West Point CTC indicating that the majority of fighters and funding behind the sectarian violence in Iraq, came from Saudi Arabia. Hersh's report specifically states:
"...[Saudi Arabia's] Bandar and other Saudis have assured the White House that “they will keep a very close eye on the religious fundamentalists. Their message to us was ‘We’ve created this movement, and we can control it.’ It’s not that we don’t want the Salafis to throw bombs; it’s who they throw them at—Hezbollah, Moqtada al-Sadr, Iran, and at the Syrians, if they continue to work with Hezbollah and Iran.” -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
Despite the narrative repeated by the Western press, it would appear that the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia above all others, constitute the greatest purveyors of state-sponsored terrorism. Furthermore, it would appear that the most feared and notorious international terrorist organization, Al Qaeda, and its various affiliates including the Muslim Brotherhood political front, was in fact not only created by the US and Saudi Arabia in the mountains of Afghanistan in the 1980's, but has since then been perpetuated by the US and Saudi Arabia.

Nations accused of coddling Al Qaeda and sponsoring terrorism, including Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Qaddafi's Libya, have in fact fought the hardest against these extremist forces but have been consistently sabotaged by Western efforts portraying targeted militants as "pro-democracy protesters" as was done in Libya
when Qaddafi's forces were at the gates of Benghazi. Similarly, this is being done in Syria today as the government of President Bashar al-Assad fights fiercely against these verified, documented terrorist networks, habitually referred to by the Western press as "freedom fighters" and "pro-democracy rebels."     The Syrian Government's Role in Supporting Al Qaeda in Iraq. 

The Western press insists that the Syrian government constitutes a threat to international security. It has been implied on many occasions that the Syrian government has been, or still is supporting Al Qaeda. However, what does the West Point Combating Terrorism Center say about the Syrian government's role regarding the influx of foreign fighters into neighboring Iraq during the West's occupation?  Or the history of the Syrian government in relation to militant extremist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, the precursor of Al Qaeda itself?


Image: West Point's second report on Al Qaeda's networks used to funnel foreign fighters into Iraq titled, "Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qa'ida's Road In and Out of Iraq," goes deeper in depth into who was really behind the influx of terrorists, how it was accomplished, and a range of options that might be applied to prevent it from happening. The report gives great insight into just how NATO and the Persian Gulf states are using Al Qaeda to now destabilize Syria.
....

In a second report, published in 2008 titled, "Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qa'ida's Road In and Out of Iraq," a rare and candid history is given regarding the genesis of Al Qaeda and the history it has had in Syria. It includes a revelation that contradicts the talking-points often repeated across Western media in regards to Syrian President Hafez Assad and his crackdown in the 1980's. The media attempts to imply that President Hafez Assad was merely an autocrat and had brutalized civilians for simply rising up against him. The 2008 CTC report however, states (emphasis added):

During the first half of the 1980s the role of foreign fighters in Afghanistan was negligible and was largely  un‐noticed by outside observers. The flow of volunteers from the Arab heartland countries was just a trickle in the early 1980s, though there were more significant links between the mujahidin and Central Asian Muslims—especially Tajiks, Uzbeks, and Kazakhs. Individuals like the above‐mentioned Abu’l‐Walid were recruited in the early years via ad hoc outreach campaigns initiated from within Afghanistan, but by 1984, the resources being poured into the conflict by other countries—especially Saudi Arabia and the United States—had become much greater, as had the effectiveness and sophistication of the recruitment efforts. Only then did foreign observers begin to remark on the presence of outside volunteers.

The repression of Islamist movements in the Middle East contributed to the acceleration of Arab fighters leaving for Afghanistan.
One important process was the Syrian regime of Hafez Assad’s brutal campaign against the Jihadi movement in Syria, led by the “Fighting Vanguard” (al‐Tali’a al‐Muqatila) of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood. The crackdown initiated an exodus of Vanguard militants to neighboring Arab states. By 1984, large numbers of these men began making their way from exile in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Jordan toward southeastern Afghanistan to fight the Soviets. (page 24, "Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qa'ida's Road In and Out of Iraq," (2008)
It appears then that Hafez Assad's "brutality" was aimed at sectarian extremists - fanatics that would later form the foundation of Al Qaeda and serve as a force of violence and destabilization throughout the world, with, as mentioned by the West Point CTC itself, resources poured into them, especially from "Saudi Arabia and the United States."

The 2008 report reiterates the importance of Libya's LIFG in regards to the large numbers of fighters it sent to Iraq and its official merging with Al Qaeda, stating:


Today, the LIFG is an important partner in al‐Qa`ida’s global coalition of Jihadi groups. The late Abu Layth al‐Libi, LIFG’s Emir, reinforced Benghazi and Darnah’s importance to Libyan Jihadis in his November 2007 announcement that LIFG had joined al‐Qa`ida, saying:
"It is with the grace of God that we were hoisting the banner of Jihad against this apostate regime under the leadership of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which sacrificed the elite of its sons and commanders in combating this regime whose blood was spilled on the mountains of Darnah, the streets of Benghazi, the outskirts of Tripoli, the desert of Sabha, and the sands of the beach." (page 38-39, "Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qa'ida's Road In and Out of Iraq," (2008)
The report goes on to describe the manner in which these fighters eventually made it into Iraq, all traveling through Syria. The report reveals that it was "coordinators" working with extremist groups in Syria, opposed to the government, not the government itself that was recruiting and arranging transportation for fighters into Iraq. Throughout the report, measures put in place by the Syrian government in fact attempted to stop the flow of fighters through Syrian territory, but were simply ineffective due to the complicated demographics and economic conditions along border regions. The report states:
Syria can almost certainly do more to disrupt the traffic across the border. However, it is unrealistic to expect the regime to expend more energy, given the economic and internal political importance of the underground cross border trade to Syrian social and political leaders, and the inherent limits of the regime’s ability to enforce a crackdown indefinitely. (page 98, "Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qa'ida's Road In and Out of Iraq," (2008)
Nowhere in the document is any evidence provided that the Syrian government actively facilitated Al Qaeda and the movement of extremist fighters through Syrian territory. Any help that might have been lent from the government would have come from characters like Nawaf Fares acting independently, whose loyalty was always questionable at best, and who eventually defected to these very extremist groups when fighters finally shifted their attention from Iraq to Syria in 2011.

It is clear that the Syrian government, for decades, has been fighting against sectarian extremism, militant terrorism, and more specifically the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda itself. What the Western press has attempted to portray as an autocratic regime brutalizing a civilian population simply aspiring for "democracy" and "freedom," is in reality a government desperately trying to protect its sovereignty and the vast majority of its population from the ravaging effects of sectarian extremism, previewed during the Iraq "civil war," and now fully realized within the borders of Syria itself.


It was perhaps the compromises made by Syria to placate a perceived "international consensus" in regards to "freedom" and "democracy" that gave militants the foothold they needed to trigger the violence now unfolding across Syria and beyond its borders. It is hoped that by documenting the evidence provided by West Point's Combating Terrorism Center, that this wave of terrorism can be better understood and therefore defeated. It is hoped that people both in the United States and in Syria can see what forces among themselves have contributed to the perpetuation of Al Qaeda and its use as a militant proxy,
and purge these organizations and their ideology permanently from the body politic.
Image: From West Point's CTC report, "Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qa'ida's Road In and Out of Iraq," a map indicates the number of total fighters that served as the statistical basis for the center's analysis. It would appear that there are many other potential nations that may yet suffer the fate of Libya and Syria within this network alone. A success in Syria for the West would validate this model for regime change, and surely be tried elsewhere.
....

By reading the tremendous body of work provided by the US Army's West Point Combating Terrorism Center's reports, "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq" and "Bombers, Bank Accounts and Bleedout: al-Qa'ida's Road In and Out of Iraq," other nations at risk of potentially falling prey to a similar use of Al Qaeda as a proxy serving Western foreign policy, can begin making preparations and raising awareness regarding the truth behind this geopolitical tool.

Little beacons of hope, where are they in upbeat USA?

.
.
.
.
Dennis Kucinich was suppose to be the nice guy who represented the moral high ground within American sewer politics.

He has been ousted by the sewer system of politics........and will retire to write his memoirs.

Many Americans such as the writer below feel disappointed with his performance and his alleged deference to Obama. But I think he did as much as was possible within the sewer ...and as much as Ron Paul, Mike Gravel or Ralph Nader or any other "Maverick" or "Independent" politician have done, or could have done.

A George Washington or a Andrew Jackson aren't suddenly going to appear from nowhere, and overwhelm the sewer.......the whole trillion $, millions upon million employee sewer.

The struggle against the sewer has to be an individual one, since time and again it has been shown that any organization which allegedly set themselves up against the sewer, invariably end up being infiltrated, used and doing the sewer's bidding finally.

The Tea Party....for example, has been hijacked by the Sewer, and has in fact weakened the so called Republican Party......or the private militia movements of the USA.

__________________________________

Dennis “Obama’s reset button” Kucinich on the “Disposition Matrix” – Soulless and Ashamed as he should be

by Scott Creighton at American Everyman

Yeah Dennis… the president did hit the reset button, didn’t he? And to think, without your support, it could never have happened. Great job Dennis. And all it cost is an unconstitutional individual mandate, (The continuation of the Patriot Act) the NDAA, Libya, Syria, QE∞, the vast expansion of the secret security state, and now the “disposition matrix” an institutionalized process of death squads from above …

There’s no fire left in little Dennis  K. 

He walks around and gives speeches like he’s at a Shriner’s club meeting or something. 

His delivery has become the definition of “phoning it in”

Perhaps that’s because he knows everything he says these days in opposition to the system, the Obama/Bush/Clinton neoliberal system, is tarred with the sticky film of his previous betrayal on the single payer universal healthcare fight, which he sold out after taking a little ride on Air Force One.

You see, Dennis was the moral leader of the Democratic opposition in the House of Representatives when the Obamacare bill (read as “insurance company bailout plan”)  was in hot debate… so they took him for a little ride on the president’s plane and he changed his tune two days later. When he folded, so did the rest of the single payer dems in congress. 

Now we got a Supreme Court ruling claiming the individual mandate to force citizens to purchase something from the private market is constitutional.

Thanks Dennis.

When asked to explain how and why he went from claiming the bill was “worse than doing nothing” just 2 days prior to his catastrophic flip-flop, little Dennis K offered up the most disgusting and sycophantic excuse possible; he claimed there was no deal with the president, no give and take to include better options for the people… he simply said he wanted to make sure the president didn’t suffer a loss of this magnitude so early in his term in office so in the future somewhere, Obama “gets a chance to hit the reset button
The president will have a stronger hand in domestic and international affairs…“
“We’re at a pivotal moment in American history, and in contrast to a crippled presidency, I have to believe that this effort, however imperfect, will now have a broad positive effect on American society, and make possible many things that might not have otherwise been possible.
“And so I think that the pivot here could be toward a very exciting time where the Obama presidency gets a chance to hit the reset button.” Dennis Kucinich
Well he certainly is doing that isn’t he Dennis?

Yes Dennis, you can be proud of the fact that you helped save President Obama’s mighty clout and from that noble act of yours, you helped empower him to be the “Greatest Man of Our Generation” that he was billed as.

Little Dennis K is leaving office this year. After a career of good public service, this is how he is going to be remembered and I for one have no problem reminding people of his personal betrayal when he tries to redeem his legacy by standing around waxing moral on the actions of President Reset Button.

So take your trophy wife, take you wig, and take off. 

We don’t need your platitudes and your empty promises anymore. We don’t need to listen to your speeches from the high moral ground about things that are happening right here right now to US by the way, not to YOU who will live out the rest of your days in the pleasant gated Green Zones of America.

Bye bye Dennis. And on your way out, shut the fuck up would you? You have no credibility currency left and you ain’t buying any as you leave with little passionless milk toast speeches like this one.

Like Anonymous, I don’t forgive and I don’t forget.

Here’s Dennis’ little soulless tirade on the president’s “disposition matrix”. I think the phrase “shell of his former self” is apt.


Oct 24, 2012

Revisionist Reflection

.
.
.
.

Rebel Politics In Russia

Isabel Magkoeva
Isabel Magkoeva

Marc Bennetts

MOSCOW (RIA Novosti) and therearenosunglasses.com

The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 appeared to have sounded the death knell for the ideas of Marx and Lenin in Russia, but just over two decades on, a new wave of young and increasingly visible socialist activists are eager to hoist the red flag over the Kremlin once more.

“I became interested in socialism when I was in my late teens,” said Isabel Magkoeva, 21, a rising star of Russia’s left and an activist with the Revolutionary Socialist Movement.

“I was always concerned by economic inequality and started to ask questions about why this should be. Then I got interested in left-wing literature,” added Magkoeva, a former teenage model who bears a striking resemblance to high-profile Chilean student protest leader Camila Vallejo. “That was when I realized I wanted to get involved.”

But although Magkoeva praises Lenin as a “great revolutionary,” she has few illusions about the Soviet Union, which ceased to exist the same year she was born.

“There was no genuine socialism in the Soviet Union,” she said. “And it is inaccurate to portray us all as seeking a return to the past. That simply isn’t true. We are for a new modernized form of socialism.”

This increase in the popularity of socialist ideas has been bolstered, in part, by Russia’s appalling record on wealth inequality, highlighted earlier this month by a report by the Swiss financial services company Credit Suisse.

“Excluding small Caribbean nations with resident billionaires, wealth inequality in Russia is the highest in the world,” the report said. “Worldwide, billionaires collectively account for less than 2% of total household wealth; in Russia today, around 100 billionaires own 30% of all personal assets.”

It is figures like this that, activists say, have attracted young Russians to socialist groups. Young left-wingers have been among the main movers in the unprecedented protests against the almost 13-year-rule of President Vladimir Putin, bucking an over-two-decade long trend that had seen unreformed, elderly Soviet-era communists as almost the sole champions of socialist causes.

“Young people have almost no chance to buy affordable housing and bring up a family normally. There is almost no opportunity for people to climb the social ladder, especially for those who are not from Moscow,” said activist Sergei Fomchenkov, 38, a leading member of the Other Russia movement.

“And so when people see all this, and then see a small group of incredibly wealthy billionaires building themselves luxury villas and so on, of course they start to see leftist ideas as a real alternative,” he added.

But, like Magkoeva, Fomchenkov has no desire to see Russia return to its Soviet past.
“We want a modernized form of socialism in which the state controls national industry, but not small businesses,” he stressed. “It would be lunacy to attempt to control the activities of every small cafĆ©, for example.”

Analysts tie this rise in socialist ideas in Russia into a similar trend in a crisis-hit Europe, where leftist parties have made dramatic gains in an increasingly polarized political atmosphere.

“Like everywhere in Europe, vulnerable young people hit by the global economic crisis are rediscovering the ideas of socialism,” said Lilia Shevtsova, an analyst at the Moscow-based Carnegie Center think tank. “These ideas were discredited in Russia in the period after the collapse of the Soviet Union, but young people are today moving toward the new left.”

Left Front

The most high-profile of this new generation of leftists, Sergei Udaltsov, made international headlines last week when he was charged with planning mass disorder across Russia on the basis of grainy footage broadcast by a pro-Kremlin channel.

Left Front leader Udaltsov, 36, a fiery, shaven-head activist who has been one of the main players in ongoing anti-Kremlin street protests, could face up to ten years behind bars if convicted on the charges, which he denies. Udaltsov was released by investigators on a pledge not to leave Moscow, but two other Left Front activists remain in custody waiting trial.

“It’s no coincidence that the Left Front movement was targeted,” activist Alexei Sakhnin told journalists after Udaltsov had been freed on a pledge not to leave Moscow. “The Left Front is the only group to have addressed social issues such as rising utility costs, which is something that millions of Russians suffer from every day.”

And the movement’s rhetoric seems to have struck a chord with many Russians. A public opinion survey by state-pollster VTsIOM indicated that Udaltsov was the only high-profile protest leader to have seen his popularity ratings increase since Putin’s election to a third term in March.

“Left wing groups in Russia openly sought a return to a socialism system in the 1990s, but they were entirely discredited,” said Left Front co-founder Ilya Ponomaryov. “But people have now again begun to see leftist ideas as a real alternative and it’s a very positive sign that more and more young people are getting involved.”

But he dismissed suggestions that history has proven it is impossible to build a viable society on the principles of socialism and communism.

“They all got Marx and Engels wrong,” he said, referring to previous failed attempts to construct socialist states. “You have to get the economic approach right first, before you can build a socialist country.”

Communist Nostalgia

Putin once famously called the Soviet Union’s collapse “the greatest geo-political catastrophe” of the 20th century, tapping into a pervasive nostalgia for the Soviet era among the older generation.

And avowed Putin foe Gennady Gudkov, a former KGB officer turned Kremlin critic,told RIA Novosti earlier this year that he shared the president’s views. 

“We could have kept the country together,” he said.

Left Front co-founder Ponomaryov, 37, also admitted to “mixed feelings” about the Soviet Union.

“It was strong state with many social guarantees, but there was far too much bureaucracy,” he said. “But it’s clear things were better in the Soviet Union than they are now.”

“There was no freedom of speech or human rights back then, but there isn’t any now, either,” he said.

This widespread respect for the Soviet past has translated into voter support for the Communist Party, the second largest political party in parliament.

But activists like Magkoeva, who spent the weekend collecting money for “political prisoners” at a two-day opposition rally in central Moscow, have little time for the party, whose veteran leader, Gennady Zyuganov, has lost four presidential elections since the break-up of the Soviet Union.

“Today’s Communist Party may praise the Soviet Union, but it has little in common with left-wing ideas,” she said. “It is an opposition for show only, which does not shy away from using the most populist ideas, from small business to Orthodox Christianity, to attract supporters.”

And it is the socialist fervor of Magkoeva and her comrades that many analysts see as the biggest threat to Putin’s grip on power.

“A few years ago, it seemed that nationalist groups posed the greatest danger to the authorities,” said Shevtsova, the Carnegie Center analyst. “But now it is clear that it is the new left.”

 

Oct 21, 2012

Turkey at a cross road

.
.
.
.
The situation in Turkey is critical. The AKP party which had previously followed a very pragmatic 'zero problem' with neighbors foreign policy has since 2011, in its own judgment decided to reward and publicly back "al-CIA-duh" regimes in Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and most critically, which has consequences for itself as a country and neighbor, "al-CIA-duh" in Syria. 

The reason for this improbability is not clear, but various reasons have been offered in the alternative media:

1. That the AKP is a CIA/State Department controlled party, and the AKP under Erdogan is merely following the masters wishes in regime change in Damascus which will usher in "al-CIA-duh" through violent insurrection, and use of foreign (95%) non-Syrian Islamists....in that theater illegally, with further colorful consequences for the country and region.

2. Modern Turkey is still controlled by the Domestic and International Jews, with its population of 30,000 officially registered Jews, and 500,000--1,000,000 "Doenme" Secret Jews. The possibility that Erdogan himself might be a Deonme Jew. That the most richest men in Turkey maybe are Deonme Jews....Koc and Sabanci family...with their traditional JEW businesses of Finance, Insurance and Real Estate (FIRE)...with a backdrop of a highly unstable economy, through speculation. These people attend Globalist/Eurocentric/Occidental (Oxymoron) organizations such as the Bilderberg group where they receive their ORDERS for Turkey. The AKP have built up the Turkish economy through such Jew "Industries"...which will have severe consequences for the country shortly.

3. Turkey is a close ally of Israel. Israeli extreme right-wingers published (From wikipedia) A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm (commonly known as the "Clean Break" report) is a policy document that was prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel.Israel's security problems in the Middle EastAccording to the report's preamble, it was written by the Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000, which was a part of the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Former United States Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle was the "Study Group Leader", but the final report included ideas from James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Robert Loewenberg, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser. The report explained a new approach to solving with an emphasis on "Western values". It has since been criticized for advocating an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.

The introduction states: 

(i). Rather than pursuing a "comprehensive peace" with the entire Arab world, Israel should work jointly with Jordan and Turkey to "contain, destabilize, and roll-back" those entities that are threats to all three.

"Securing the Northern Border"
"Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by: ---striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan. ---paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces.... "
"Israel also can take this opportunity to remind the world of the nature of the Syrian regime. Syria repeatedly breaks its word. It violated numerous agreements with the Turks, and has betrayed the United States by continuing to occupy Lebanon in violation of the Taef agreement in 1989. Instead, Syria staged a sham election, installed a quisling regime, and forced Lebanon to sign a "Brotherhood Agreement" in 1991, that terminated Lebanese sovereignty. And Syria has begun colonizing Lebanon with hundreds of thousands of Syrians, while killing tens of thousands of its own citizens at a time, as it did in only three days in 1983 in Hama....Given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan comprehensive peace and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction programs, and rejecting land for peace deals on the Golan Heights."
"Moving to a Traditional Balance of Power Strategy"
"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions."
"Since Iraq's future could affect the strategic balance in the Middle East profoundly, it would be understandable that Israel has an interest in supporting the Hashemites in their efforts to redefine Iraq,including such measures as: visiting Jordan as the first official state visit, even before a visit to the United States, of the new Netanyahu government; supporting King Hussein by providing him with some tangible security measures to protect his regime against Syrian subversion; encouraging — through influence in the U.S. business community — investment in Jordan to structurally shift Jordan’s economy away from dependence on Iraq; and diverting Syria’s attention by using Lebanese opposition elements to destabilize Syrian control of Lebanon. .. Were the Hashemites to control Iraq, they could use their influence over Najf to help Israel wean the south Lebanese Shia away from Hizballah, Iran, and Syria. Shia retain strong ties to the Hashemites: the Shia venerate foremost the Prophet’s family, the direct descendants of which — and in whose veins the blood of the Prophet flows — is King Hussein

To summarize point 3 ......Turkey is merely being a good Ibne dog of Israel, against Syria....without due regard for its own interests, because of the over-arching influence of the Jews within Turkey. 

4. Finally that the AKP party is in reality a true Islamist party with suits and tie. Its recent purging of the secularist Kemalist military and secular critical journalists alludes to this secret fact. Its support for "al-CIA-duh" in the Middle East, and especially in Syria, is merely a prelude to the AKP's own unmasking of itself as a fully fledged Islamist Party...which is guided by the CIA/State Department and Israel.

But for the rest of us TURKEY is a great country with GREAT people who deserve better. 

We understand cunning guile and plots within International/national entities can subvert the best of countries....as it did Germany between 1933--1945, which resulted in the death of 10 million German people, the division of the country, the humiliation of the country, the destruction of the country, and the added future costs with guilt to the country for the crimes committed by a few well organized International Jewish entities within Germany, the USA and London......with the added burden and costs to the rest of the world.

We want Turkey to do well, NOT destroy itself in the noble service of International Jews.

Here are a few points made by a Jewish American writer which highlight the weakness of Turkish society....which require urgent attention and redressing, soon.

This clearly is not rocket science mixed with astro-meta physics. The structural problems of Turkey are well known within Turkey, BUT merely require a nationalist government which will seriously address the problems using  judiciously the full resources of the state.......without the need to rely on International globalist Jewish organizations. 

_______________________

by David P. Goldman
Middle East Quarterly........

Turkey’s high-flying economy, which expanded at a 10 percent annual rate of gross domestic product growth during the first half of 2011, will collapse SOON. 

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s “economic miracle,” to use the Daily Telegraph‘s admiring words, depended on a 40 percent annual rate of bank credit expansion, which in turn produced a balance of payments deficit as wide as that of southern Europe’s crisis countries. 

2012 approximate projections

Exports: $140 billion

Imports: $250 billion

Turkeys external debt: $330 billion


Markets have already anticipated a sudden turnaround in the Turkish economy. 

The Turkish lira (TRY) fell by a quarter between November 2010 and September 2011, making it the world’s worst performing emerging market currency. 

The stock market has fallen in dollar terms by 40 percent, making Turkey the worst performer after Egypt among all the markets in the MSCI Tradable Index during 2011. (See Graph 1 for Turkey vs. emerging markets.) 

And most analysts now expect that the cyclical slowdown will uncover deep deficiencies in Turkey’s labor force and infrastructure, leading to a prolonged structural slump rather than a passing recession.

The writer speculates the political consequences .......

The suddenness and size of this economic setback will in most likelihood erode the ruling Justice and Development Party’s (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) capacity to govern on the strength of pragmatic success rather than Islamist ideology; will undercut its ability to use economic incentives to defuse Kurdish separatism and contain domestic opposition; and will weaken Ankara’s claim to a leading regional role.

Graph 1: Turkish Stock Market vs. Emerging Market Index, Dec. 2010-Sept. 2011




Source: MSCI
 

Turkey’s predicament follows a well-known pattern of Third World economic crises driven by external imbalances. 

The impetus behind the country’s recent economic growth has been a stunning rate of credit expansion, which reached 30 percent for households and 40 percent for business in 2011. By contrast, inflation-adjusted consumer credit growth in the United States from 1984 to 2008 peaked at just 12 percent in 1995.

The banks aligned with the AKP, that is, the four Shari’a-compliant banks (or participation banks), have increased their consumer loans at a much faster rate than the conventional banks. In the year through September 16, 2011, consumer loans by the Islamic banks rose by 53 percent, according to the Central Bank’s data base, compared to 36 percent for commercial banks. The Islamic banks have lent TRY 5 billion to consumers, about a quarter as much as the commercial banks.

In the past two years, the ratio of debt to disposable income in Turkish households rose from 35 percent to 45 percent. This growing demand was far in excess of what domestic output could satisfy. Graph 2 shows that the current account deficit widened accordingly as credit demand rose and the marginal dollar of consumer demand went to imports rather than domestic purchases.

Graph 2: Total Credit Growth vs. Current Account Deficit, 2006 to Present




A Deeper Malaise

Turkey faces not only a sharp reversal of economic fortunes in the short term but also formidable obstacles to recovery in the medium term. 

The country has no natural resources with which to emulate Brazil or Russia and lacks the human capital to compete with emerging Asia. 

(Negative/too pessimistic......Turkey has resources within its landmass which have not been exploited fully yet, such as chromium, iron ore, lignite and Thorium...and in the sea oil and gas. Turkey can also be a successful resource-less country like Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan. Many LEDC countries are resources rich, but they also have corrupt USA backed governments..IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN with trillions worth of minerals, but also FAILED STATES, with extreme levels of corruption)

Although its universities train some excellent engineers and managers, the population as a whole is poorly educated in comparison with other middle-upper income countries. Only 26 percent of Turkish children graduate secondary school, compared to 44 percent in Mexico, 64 percent in Portugal, and 83 percent in Poland.

Low-value added products (textiles, apparel, furniture, appliances, autos) dominate its export profile. Turkish industry has never succeeded in any field of high technology.

Despite Anatolian success in medium-tech industries such as textiles and food processing, the deep backwardness of the Turkish hinterland remains a difficult hurdle. 

Traditional prejudice still prevents most Turkish women from working outside the home despite advancements in female education and a decline in fertility. Turkish women have lost ground in economic life: Only 22 percent sought employment in 2009, down from more than 34 percent in 1988. In contrast, 54 percent of South Korean women work. As smallholding agriculture shrinks, women who no longer can work on the family farm simply sit at home. The collapse in the female labor force participation rate is a striking gauge of the country’s failure to modernize. 

Turkey’s official unemployment rate stands at around 10 percent; adjusted for the underemployment of Turkish women, the unemployment rate would be above 25 percent. Roughly 43 percent of Turkish employment is off the books, compared to a developed-country average of 18 percent.

Turkey’s longer-term risks are even more daunting. 

A developing country cannot sustain a fertility rate that leads to a rapid increase in elderly dependents, yet the fertility rate of Turks for whom Turkish is a first language has been in steady decline over the past fifteen years, falling to only 1.5—equal to that of Europe—while its population is aging almost as fast as Iran’s, leaving the country’s social security system with a deficit of close to 5 percent of GDP. “If we continue the existing [fertility] trend, 2038 will mark disaster for us,” Erdoğan warned in a May 2010 speech.

Erdoğan is right: Should the trend continue, the Turkish economy will collapse under the strain of caring for its dependent elderly while the country’s young people will be concentrated in the Kurdish minority, fueling demands for independence from the hard hand of the Turkish state. 

But Erdoğan’s predicament is, of course, far more immediate. His government’s reluctance to encourage greater savings at home does not bode well for Turkey’s future. “This heavy reliance on external savings exposes Turkey to shocks,” notes Standard and Poor’s, “either domestic (for example if Turkey’s recent high domestic credit growth resulted in future bad loans) or external (say, if rising risk aversion were to prompt foreign investors and bank credit officers to reduce exposure to Turkish entities).”

According to Murat Üçer, the question is whether “Turkey can manage a soft landing or whether there’ll be a correction because of external factors, which could be very ugly indeed.”

If the prime minister and the AKP respond to the coming economic crisis by pushing Turkey further in the direction of Islamism, the consequences for the country’s economy could be grave in the extreme. According to Bilgi University professor Asaf Savas Akat, a Turkish television commentator and long-time official of the secular Social Democratic Party,
It’s important to keep in mind that Turkey is a resource-poor country … We rely on the confidence of financial markets. … If Turkey goes in the Iranian direction, the financial markets will shut us out. The middle class will ship their money overseas, and many of them will move overseas, like Iran’s middle class did after Khomeini’s revolution. The country will collapse.
YES, the Jew makes a good point.....In Iran 5 million educated Iranians left the country taking with them $1.5 trillion worth of assets, encouraged it seems by the mullahs to foster a largely illiterate population which for them would be easier to manage......and control.

Implications

As Erdoğan’s economic miracle evaporates, his ability to govern will diminish. 

On the eve of the June 2011 national elections, Turks were “almost evenly divided about the current direction of their country” according to a Pew Research Center survey. 

Views about the economy were split down the middle with 49 percent saying that the economic situation was good, and 48 percent saying that it was bad, a meager result after two quarters of blistering GDP growth. 

A sharp religious divide characterizes sentiment about the overall direction of the country: 67 percent of those who “pray rarely” are “dissatisfied” while 64 percent of those who pray five times a day are “satisfied.”

The country’s economic performance evidently tips the balance in favor of the AKP.

AKP Islamists face entrenched and embittered opposition after three years of mass arrests of political opponents, journalists, and military officers on flimsy charges of coup plotting. 

While the silent majority of Turks acquiesced in this abuse so long as the economy was booming, this is likely to change in the wake of a major economic reverse, which will in turn undercut Erdoğan’s efforts to project Turkish power abroad. 

 “Turkey looks to punch above its weight,” the London Financial Times recently commented.

The trouble is that it is also punching above its strength.

______________________________

The Jew writer gloats at Turkeys Jew imposed problems, the so called second best friend of ISRAEL.

The copy paste of the Jew article by me does not have that intention.

We want Turkey to succeed just like all states in the world.

Turkey should detach itself from the International Jew network.

Turkey should have governments that work solely for itself.

Turkey should not facilitate "al-CIA-duh" in the Greater Middle East, and do harm to its peaceful neighbors.....this would have been the wish of Deonme secular Attaturk.

Oct 15, 2012

Malala the Swat Pathan girl activist

.
.
.
.
I myself have no clear perspective on this issue. 

Western military security ops whether independently, or in conjunctions with the Gunga Dins certainly kill an awful lot of peaceful civilians in Pakistan, whether tribal leaders, women or children, around Pakistan.......is it 4000 or 40,000 since 2001. 

The harm against 40,000 is as bad as the harm against one person. 

The Western writer below, whose articles I sometimes copy paste, says the Malala tragedy is an Western Intelligence psy-ops rather like the fake crying Kuwaiti girl, and incubator story which gave Oomp to the war against CIA Saddam in 1991. 

Righteous instantaneous mass indignation that is channeled and mobilized by the forces of Western Intelligence to effect certain pre-ordained OUTCOMES. 

Intelligence agencies use children, often after brainwashing for specific agenda's especially in the West......groomed either as sex slaves, future actors, future pop stars(adored and worshiped by the masses).....future leaders of the country (Barack Hussein Obama......and his CIA parents, being the best example) 

In the cloak and dagger world of Espionage persuasion certainly plays a major role, along with propaganda, symbolism of objects, numbers, colors....  

WHY?

Why now?

The American drones that kill innocent civilians are widely unpopular in Pakistan, naturally. Some politicians trying to gain mileage from this widely held sentiment organized a march to the homes of the victims recently, but were blocked by the Pakistan military from completing the march. Further protests are planned against this International and national crime, against innocent civilians. This puts the culprits, the USA on the defensive as does the Gunga Dins who help them commit the crime, the Pakistan military/ISI. 

Drone strikes cannot take place in Pakistan without the assistance of the Pakistan military.

So what do you do to divert attention?........and take the wind out of the sail of the anti-drone movement in Pakistan. You fake a shooting of a 14 year old girl, and you mobilize your intelligence assets in the country into a righteous indignation frenzy. Remember 4,000--40,000 innocent civilians have died in Pakistan because of the American backed GWot, since 2001. 

The TTP is an American Intelligence terrorist organization made up of leadership released from Guantanamo, on the basis that they would cooperate with the USA in destabilizing Pakistan through terrorism. So if they claimed credit for this fake event, it would be no surprise, or the ISI controlled Afghan Taliban for that matter.

The above is the view of the writer below broadly speaking, and outlined by me in my own words.

The other reason for the Malala fake episode according to the writer below is that the TAPI pipeline has been re-routed through Central Afghanistan, and Swat, instead of going South through troublesome Baluchistan..........and so the Taliban in that new area need to be neutralized "softened up" through drones on the one hand, and Pakistan military action on the other.

This argument has one weakness in that it is widely acknowledged that the TTP, and the Afghan Taliban are controlled by the CIA/ISI.....as "Controlled Opposition". Why would the CIA/ISI need to demonize their own assets, which gives them so much "Business" and self importance in saving the world, to the point of destroying them through serious military action, finally? One is certain the CIA-ISI have enough influence in the Taliban for them to accept the TAPI pipeline through their territory.

The writer below argues the Taliban accept the TAPI pipeline, but not the presence of foreign troops protecting it.

The article below is comprehensive however, and interesting:

___________________________________

The Staged Malala Yousafzai Story: The End Game of the “New Great Game” Unfolds


by Scott Creighton at American everyman

Abductions (by the ISI and Pakistani military Frontier Corps) were carried out in broad daylight, often in busy public areas, and in the presence of multiple witnesses. Victims were taken away from shops and hotels, public buses, university campuses, homes, and places of work.
The victims of enforced disappearances in the cases documented were predominantly men in their mid-20s to mid-40s. Three of the disappeared were children, the youngest of whom was 12 years old (two years younger than Malala) at the time of the abduction.” Human Rights Watch report page 2

The ongoing Malala Yousafzai psyop has been largely ignored by most of the “alternative” news sites here in the states.

You have to ask yourself why that is when the story itself is so obviously custom tailored to promote more war, ISI death squads and drone strikes in key regions in Pakistan (Swat Valley for one) and Balochistan. 

The official story is changing so rapidly that even the MSM with their talking points memos can’t keep up with the new spin. It seems like every article and every interview ends up focusing on this “Malala’s way” forward for the nation of Pakistan which translates to the “CIA’s way”or “NATO’s way”. In press reports, interviewees are constantly required to declare Pakistan’s new commitment to rid the country of the “evil doers” who stand in the way of our neo-liberal agenda.

Unfortunately for Pakistan, they find themselves in the middle of the most important geopolitical hot spot in the ongoing “great game”. The trick for Pakistan is to avoid becoming road kill in Washington and London’s new “silk road” project. The trick for the alternative news sources here in the states like this one, is to not allow them to be run over without notice by the American people who in the end are financing the game and thus may be the only people on the planet in a position to stop it.
A little background

“However, the overriding American objective to promote TAPI is to ensure that the IPI project is effectively killed. America has a history of bulldozing economically unpopular projects in exchange for politico-strategic gains.” The Nation May 2012

Captain Arthur Connolly of the East India Company coined the term “the great game” before someone loped off his head for being a spy back in 1842. Russia and England were involved in a deadly cold war, covert and dangerous, to secure control of the spoils of the Middle East from the Caspian down to southern India. The Great Game is still well underway.

In the forefront of this global economic/energy conflict, are two main pipeline concepts designed to bring enormous amounts of LNG to the energy starved regions of Pakistan, India and South China: the TAPI (trans-Afghan) pipeline, supported by the U.S., Britain, and NATO countries and you have the IPI (Peace Pipeline) supported by the Iranians, the Russians, the Chinese and certain politicians in Pakistan.
"
The tussle over the IPI and the TAPI is not a mere economic battle; it has far-reaching geopolitical dimensions. The IPI and TAPI are symbols of the ‘new great game’ – the main goal of which is gaining control of oil and gas reserves in this region. The US and its allies want Pakistan to abdicate the IPI and pursue the TAPI only; India has already done so. Now, China and Russia are supporting Pakistan to withstand the US pressure for giving up the IP project.” The Nation May 2012

As I have written before on this subject, the trans-Afghan pipeline is underway but meeting heavy resistance from various nationalist groups in both Pakistan and Afghanistan who seem to resent this pipeline being secured through their country by a foreign occupying force at the barrel of a drone missile strike while the Peace Pipeline is now moving forward in the Balochistan area of Pakistan since they finally secured a contract with Russia to build the final Pakistani leg of the pipeline. 

India is still waiting in the wings and no one actually believes they will reject the LNG once the Peace Pipeline is complete.

In order to understand the Malala psyop, one must understand the players involved and the nature of the micro-political tensions inside Pakistan, which I am certainly no expert on, but I will attempt to map out the broad strokes as best I can.

As you can see from the map below, the two areas which are most referenced by the talking heads in the military (namely the ISPR propaganda branch of the Pakistani military) when it comes to talking about the rising Taliban influence in Pakistan that must now be crushed because of little innocent Malala, are the Swat Valley and Balochistan and they are key regions in both the IPI (Peace Pipeline) and the TAPI (trans-Afghan pipeline)
click on image for larger view
The New Great Game

The people of Balochistan have been fiercely independent of Pakistan for quite sometime. They are secular by nature, mainly consisting of Sunni Muslims. It’s a harsh landscape which creates tough people. The part of Balochistan which is in what is considered modern Pakistan (Balochistan is partly in Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan) have often risen up against the Punjab dominated Pakistan state.

The ISI and the CIA have been staging “extremist’ terror attacks inside Balochistan for decades looking to destabilize the key region in order to exert more of their influence in the area.

(Strategy of tension)

“Although Baloch people are mostly secular in nature, the invasive influence of Pakistani intelligence agencies in Balochistan and extremist religious parties in the region are propagating extremism in Baloch societies. The spread of Talibanism is also a constant threat to Baloch and its cultural values. In the past sixty years, Balochis have persistently rejected extremism and Talibanism in the region.” Wiki

In 2011, Human Rights Watch published a report titled “We Can Torture, Kill, or Keep You for Years” Enforced Disappearances by Pakistan Security Forces in Balochistan (pdf). It’s about how the ISI (in conjunction with their sister agency, the CIA) has been killing and disappearing Baloch nationalist activists in Balochistan in support of their ultimate goal, taking complete control of the region. In short, in support of their efforts to stop the Peace Pipeline by taking control of the land on which it will be built, the ISI is operating death squads in the region with the complicit support of the United States.

On December 11, 2009, a 39-year-old Baloch nationalist activist, Abdul Ghaffar Lango, and his wife were leaving a hospital in Pakistan’s southern city of Karachi after her discharge from surgery when two white Toyota pickup trucks suddenly stopped at the main gate. Lango’s wife said that about 10 men in plain clothes approached the couple and one started beating Lango with the butt of an AK-47 assault rifle until he lost consciousness.
The men then dragged him into one of the pickups and drove away. When the family went to register the abduction with the police, the police informed them that Lango had been detained because of his political activities, yet refused to provide further information on his whereabouts or specific charges against him.
On July 1, 2011, Lango’s corpse was found in an abandoned hotel near Lakbado area of Gadani town in the Lasbela district of Balochistan. The local police represented by the Station House Officer (SHO) of Gadani Police Station told the local media that “the body bore multiple marks of brutal torture.” Human Rights Watch report page 1

The report goes on:

Abductions (by the ISI and Pakistani military Frontier Corps) were carried out in broad daylight, often in busy public areas, and in the presence of multiple witnesses. Victims were taken away from shops and hotels, public buses, university campuses, homes, and places of work.
The victims of enforced disappearances in the cases documented were predominantly men in their mid-20s to mid-40s. Three of the disappeared were children, the youngest of whom was 12 years old (two years younger than Malala) at the time of the abduction.”
…. Witnesses frequently described the perpetrators as armed men in civilian clothes, usually arriving in one or more four-door pickup trucks. The witnesses typically referred to these assailants as representatives of the “agencies,” a term commonly used to describe the intelligence agencies, including the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Military Intelligence (MI), and the Intelligence Bureau (IB). Other information obtained by Human Rights Watch in many cases corroborates these claims.
In cases documented by Human Rights Watch, the abductions were carried out by, in the presence of, or with the assistance of uniformed personnel of the Frontier Corps (FC), an Interior Ministry paramilitary force. In a number of cases, police assisted by being present at the scene or securing an area while plainclothes intelligence officers abducted individuals who later “disappeared.”  Human Rights Watch report page 2

In such an environment is it so difficult to believe that this Malala incident was created by those interested in generating a new narrative which would justify greater violence and military action to secure that key area in Pakistan where the Peace Pipeline is about to be built?

The story has all the noted hallmarks of an ISI/ISPR operation. In fact, there are many people inside Pakistan, in Balochistan and across the country who are calling this a staged event, just like I have.

One such person’s writing was made available to me and the readers here via a commenter, MOMIN, who left his (her?) article in the comment section of one of my articles. It reads in part as follows:

“The attack on Mulala Yousufzai is a brutal attempt by traitors within political and military leadership to win back the peoples support so that they could spread this American backed war against terrorism to other parts of the country. Previously a fabricated video and an attack on GHQ were used as an excuse to launch military operations in Swat and tribal areas. But then the people awoke to the reality of the game plan of the traitors within political and military leadership. That is why even after the attacks on Mehran Naval base in Karachi and Kamra air base, traitors within the political and military leadership failed to gain the people’s support to extend this American war to other parts of the country. People now know that it is this traitor leadership that has allowed terrorist organizations like Blackwater and terrorists like Raymond Davis to freely move around the country.” Shahzad Shaikh

It is Shahzad’s position that Malala was actually shot. It is my contention that this entire episode has been staged. It’s a form of Global War on Terror street theater in which the goals are achieved without actually having to kill Malala. There are many good reasons which I have already laid out to support that hypothesis. Perhaps the best way we have to see that this was a staged event is to understand that little Malala would serve their interests better as a spokesman rather than a martyr for the cause. Thus, in my opinion, they didn’t actually shoot her.

Regardless who’s right on that count, the point I and Shahzad are making is the same: this is the result of a psychological operation with the end game being the approval of both Pakistani and U.S. citizens of more military action in the Swat Valley where the TAPI pipeline is heading and the Balochistan region where the IPI pipeline is about to be built.

The history of the ISI conforms to this conclusion as does the facts on the ground surrounding the supposed attack on Malala.

We are witnessing history: the end game of the New Great Game is unfolding right before our eyes.

Two pipeline routes are being designed by the UK company Penspen. According to Penspen, the project will cost $2.5 billion and will carry 30 billion cubic metres of gas per year from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan on to Pakistan and India, in association with Nippon Koei UK.24 Consequently, a path must be cleared in the relevant regions. The upper route of the proposed pipeline corresponds to the increase in Anglo-American drone attacks in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region. Axis of Logic, Oct. 2011