The coming American Revolution.

.
.
.
.
The USA was founded over two centuries ago.

This did not happen automatically or inevitably. The 13 Colonies, unlike say India enjoyed many of the benefits of being part of the burgeoning British Empire........security protection against Spain, the Red Indians and the French, and access to the huge market of the empire, where raw materials from the 13 colonies had a huge guaranteed market access, at favorable not exploitative prices.

The living standards of the average colonial was better than their counter-part in the United Kingdom, especially those living in the "Celtic Fringe" in Scotland, Wales and Ireland........and the reason why most American immigrants from the United Kingdom to the USA are from those parts originally, and why Scotch-Irish have dominated America for the better part of two centuries in various spheres.

So unlike in India, where the British military plundered, grew opium for export to China, taxed like there was no tomorrow, transported South Indians to work in plantations in Malaysia and elsewhere, and starved to death 30 million 1757--1947........the situation in the 13 Colonies was pretty agreeable for the settlers who were at that time mainly from the UK.

AND yet despite all this they revolted against the Evil British crown.

Perception and what is acceptable depends on many things, though education is significant among them. Many of those who signed the declaration of independence were mainly from Middle Class and Upper Middle class background. They were well read enlightened men who were born and bred within the "age of reason" and influenced by philosophers such as John Locke who, "advocated governmental separation of powers and believed that revolution is not only a right but an obligation in some circumstances. These ideas would come to have profound influence on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States.".... wikipedia.

In the "Two Treaties of Government" published anonymously in 1690.....Locke "outlines a theory of civil society. John Locke begins by describing the state of nature, ........ and argues that all men are created equal in the state of nature by God. From this, he goes on to explain the hypothetical rise of property and civilization, in the process explaining that the only legitimate governments are those that have the consent of the people. Therefore, any government that rules without the consent of the people can, in theory, be overthrown.".....wikipedia.

Over two centuries have passed, and London again through the House of Rothschilds now controls the USA via the Jewish community and secret Jews within American society.

It is true the USA is the richest nation on earth with a $15 trillion economy, and per capita income approaching $50,000, BUT these impressive figures bellies many problems within the USA which burdens a significant section of America.

First and foremost is the endless wars that the USA conducts and further seeks out which have cost the lives of about 6300 servicemen officially in Iraq and Afghanistan. But in reality the cost is far far higher approaching 100,000 deaths....if the deaths recorded later from wounds are counted, and the suicides from the stress of combat. Beyond this unnecessary human tragedy, there is also the cost of modern warfare....into the trillions of $, after 10 years of fighting. This clearly cannot be sustained forever. No nation however well managed and efficient can sustain this.

On the civilian side 50 million Americans are on food stamps living in poverty, with the working class suffering because they must maintain two jobs to survive. The middle class are being squeezed. The government is cutting back on social welfare, and all benefits. Privatizing education is being debated.

The Federal Reserve established since 1913 by the Rothschilds of London through their agents in America is wrecking havoc on the economy, as is Wall Street. The operations of the Federal Reserve and Wall Street is inimical to the general welfare and well being of the average American. The USA is being turned into a feudal economy with a few rich people, owing fealty to the Rothschilds of London, and on the other side a mass of harassed, poor over worked people representing the majority.

Clearly this situation cannot last and Revolution is inevitable? Or can it?

From our experience of the Great Depression where possibly 3-8 million American starved to death, we see that even in the land of the free and brave, people obediently followed the laws of the land and there was no great revolution between 1929--1933.

On the other hand the USA State has anticipated possible revolution and since the 1960's has built a considerable Police State to deal with any potential revolutionary movements. Concentration camps with watch towers have been constructed around the USA, which can house up to 10 million people, and the list of 30 million American subversives have been drawn up by the FBI as and when the need requires. Drills have been undertaken for the mass arrest of large numbers of people........Operation Falcon for the future.

For the Rothschilds of London there is no compromise, no live and let live. They must have their way exercised through the UK state, the USA and other International bodies. They must have their trillions more at the cost of more innocent lives.

Obviously to hedge their bets they have infiltrated possible revolutionary groups such as the "Tea Party" movement which in reality is "controlled opposition" led by Sarah Palin a crypto-Jewess and on the Republican side with strong Jewish tendencies Michele Bachmann. These female figures indicate to us the TRUE SOURCE of the original problem in the USA and the world.

Islam bashing and loving Israel cannot solve the mortgage crisis, the Wall Street banker crisis, the Federal Reserve national financial crisis, the governance crisis, the Capital Hill corruption crisis, the Presidential crisis, the poverty crisis, the unemployment crisis, the healthcare crisis, the education crisis, the crime crisis, the immigration and open border crisis; the constant wars for Israel crisis; American Jews who work for Israel crisis; Rothschilds agents in government crisis.

Nor will countless Hollywood manufacture of comic strip superhero's help the situation either. They may appeal to some adolescent boys, but have no relevance for the majority of the population......who see and face the REALITY of the situation.

Americans must organize for REVOLUTION, and must be wary of crypto-Jewish infiltration of their organizations. They must take inspiration from the Founding Fathers, and read about their true struggles of many hard thankless years against the might of the British empire.























______________________________

Pollster: Americans Are “Pre-Revolutionary”

Infowars.com and Paul Watson.

Amidst riots in central Europe that have now spread to London and a debt downgrade that threatens to plunge the United States into a double-dip recession, Americans’ lack of confidence in their leadership is so crippled that they are now “pre-revolutionary,” according to pollster Pat Caddell.

A new Rasmussen poll shows that just 17 per cent of Americans believe that the U.S. government has the consent of the governed, an all time low. This dovetails with a record low for Congress’ approval rating, which stands at a paltry 6 per cent, while 46 per cent of Americans think most members of Congress are corrupt, with just 29% believing otherwise.

“The number of voters who feel the government has the consent of the governed – a foundational principle, contained in the Declaration of Independence – is down from 23% in early May and has fallen to its lowest level measured yet,” according to Rasmussen.

The poll was conducted before Friday’s U.S. debt downgrade, indicating that the figures could be even more dire in the aftermath of what some analysts believe is a precursor to a new great depression.

The results of this survey indicate that Americans are now “pre-revolutionary” says pollster Pat Caddell, who described the outcome of the poll as “unprecedented”.

This conclusion follows Caddell’s observation last November that “a sea of anger is churning” amongst Americans who “want to take their country back” and that the nation stood on the brink of a “pre-revolutionary moment”.

Caddell’s conclusion that Americans are on the verge of rising up against a system in which they have lost all trust cannot be easily dismissed as partisan rhetoric. Despite working for numerous Democratic presidential candidates, including Jimmy Carter and Joe Biden, Caddell has been a vociferous critic of both Democrats and Republicans on several issues. Back in early 2008, before the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the start of the financial crisis, we warned that inflation and economic uncertainty would cause a massive social dislocation, which would lead to riots globally. Gerald Celente and others repeated the warning in late 2008. Over the last 18 months, we have now witnessed such scenes across the Middle East and in France, Spain, Greece, Italy and most recently London.

Indeed, the only major western country not to experience significant social unrest since the economic collapse is America, although anecdotal evidence of rising crime and thefts suggests a turning point could be just around the corner.

Should violence plague American streets as a result of a deepening economic crisis, U.S. troops have already been prepared to deal with such a crisis.

As we reported three years ago, U.S. troops returning from Iraq were being re-allocated to occupy America, running checkpoints and training to deal with “civil unrest and crowd control” under the auspices of a Northcom program that revolved around deploying 20,000 active duty troops inside America to “help” state and local officials during times of emergency.

The date set for the completion of this program was 2011, just in time to deal with the “pre-revolutionary” fervor that many fear will now manifest itself in Greece-like mayhem as a result of the fallout from the debt downgrade and America’s slide towards economic collapse.

Pentagon Strategic Policy paper----whose listening?

.
.
.
.

The Y Article: The Pentagon's Secret Plan to Slash its Own Budget.

by John Norris at CommonDreams.org

WASHINGTON - On Friday, April 8, as members of the U.S. Congress engaged in a last-minute game of chicken over the federal budget, the Pentagon quietly issued a report that received little initial attention: "A National Strategic Narrative." The report was issued under the pseudonym of "Mr. Y," a takeoff on George Kennan's 1946 "Long Telegram" from Moscow (published under the name "X" the following year in Foreign Affairs) that helped set containment as the cornerstone of U.S. strategy for dealing with the Soviet Union.

The piece was written by two senior members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in a "personal" capacity, but it is clear that it would not have seen the light of day without a measure of official approval. Its findings are revelatory, and they deserve to be read and appreciated not only by every lawmaker in Congress, but by every American citizen.

Article Y is most striking not because of what it says, but who says it. The report was "penned by senior military thinkers, not the Sierra Club. The simple fact is that any clear-eyed analysis pretty quickly comes to the same conclusion: The United States has established an incentive system that just doesn't make any sense." The narrative argues that the United States is fundamentally getting it wrong when it comes to setting its priorities, particularly with regard to the budget and how Americans as a nation use their resources more broadly.

The report says Americans are overreacting to Islamic extremism, under-investing in their youth, and failing to embrace the sense of competition and opportunity that made America a world power. The United States has been increasingly consumed by seeing the world through the lens of threat, while failing to understand that influence, competitiveness, and innovation are the key to advancing American interests in the modern world.

Courageously, the authors make the case that America continues to rely far too heavily on its military as the primary tool for how it engages the world. Instead of simply pumping more and more dollars into defense, the narrative argues:

By investing energy, talent, and dollars now in the education and training of young Americans -- the scientists, statesmen, industrialists, farmers, inventors, educators, clergy, artists, service members, and parents, of tomorrow -- we are truly investing in our ability to successfully compete in, and influence, the strategic environment of the future. Our first investment priority, then, is intellectual capital and a sustainable infrastructure of education, health and social services to provide for the continuing development and growth of America's youth.

Yet, it is investments in America's long-term human resources that have come under the fiercest attack in the current budget environment. As the United States tries to compete with China, India, and the European Union, does it make sense to have almost doubled the Pentagon budget in the last decade while slashing education budgets across the country?

The report places considerable emphasis on the importance of achieving a more sustainable approach to security, energy, agriculture, and the environment. Again, it is important to stress that this narrative was penned by senior military thinkers, not the Sierra Club. The simple fact is that any clear-eyed analysis pretty quickly comes to the same conclusion: The United States has established an incentive system that just doesn't make any sense. It continues to pour tens of billions of dollars into agricultural and oil subsidies every single year even as these subsidies make the gravity of the environmental, health, and land-use problems the country faces in the future ever graver. As the report argues, America cannot truly practice the use of "smart power" until it practices "smart growth" at home. While some may be quick to argue that the Pentagon should not be considering issues like smart growth and investments in America's youth, this goes to another key point from the authors: America won't get its approach to policy right if it leaves foreign policy and domestic policy in tidy little silos that ignore the interconnection between the two.

The paper argues persuasively that the tendency of Americans to broadly label the rest of the world has been hugely counterproductive. The authors point out that the tendency over the last decade by some Americans to view all Muslims as terrorists has made it more difficult to marginalize genuine extremism, while alienating vast swaths of the global Muslim community. In a world where credibility is so central to America's national interest and reach around the globe, the overheated domestic debate about the war on terror has never served it very well.

Lastly, the narrative makes a clarion call for America to look forward, not back, in today's interconnected world:

And yet with globalization, we seem to have developed a strange apprehension about the efficacy of our ability to apply the innovation and hard work necessary to successfully compete in a complex security and economic environment. Further, we have misunderstood interdependence as a weakness rather than recognizing it as a strength. The key to sustaining our competitive edge, at home or on the world stage, is credibility -- and credibility is a difficult capital to foster. It cannot be won through intimidation and threat, it cannot be sustained through protectionism or exclusion. Credibility requires engagement, strength, and reliability -- imaginatively applied through the national tools of development, diplomacy, and defense.

The budget deal over the weekend lopped $8 billion off of funding for the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Defense spending was left untouched. Congress doesn't seem to have gotten the wake-up call.

© 2011 Foreign Policy

Pessimism will get America and the Democrats nowhere.

.
.
.
.
An insightful, some what frustrated, pessimistic, impatient article by Professor Dave Green, outta Noo Yawk.
.
He is of course quite right that Obama is in danger of being the night watchman, during whose reign the Second Great Depression is ushered in, and thus his administration becomes a motionless dud presidency "fixed"policy wise by economic decline, and he leaves office with an unnoticeable legislative whimper; a one term wonder, all smiles or maybe not later, filled with cross-party compromise/surrender; the uniqueness/novelty of being a black presidency, with a Nobel Peace prize; with on-going wars and not much else. Then a rabid mother of all right wing government comes into power in 2012, under Chilling moose Sarah Palin..........and civilization as we know it ends.......Jesus does a second coming ......read the book.........seen the play.......and the movie.
.
But realistically he has only been in power for just over 8 months, so lets give him a few more months to up his game for America and the world, which presumably the Nobel Peace Prize was trying to nudge him to do for the international community.
.
In understanding American politics, or Western politics generally, one must grasp Israeli politics first, which has shifted markedly to the extreme right lead by the Likud Party. Jewish intellectual thinking especially in Western countries lead by this particular tribal urge from Israel, and the Likud Party, with its fronts and Think Tanks in the West, have made an aggressive assault on the fundamental political thinking of Western societies through various ideological vehicles such as Monetarism, Reagan economics, Neocons........and so forth, dominated all by Jewish intellectuals.
.
You can have good governments both from the center-left and the center-right, it does not matter, as long as the leaders of such parties surrounded by good team players have the right mix of policies which are implemented judiciously, through the national legislature, purely with the interests of the country in which they serve in mind.
.
The problem starts when you have pseudo-Fascists junta's installed at Israel's/Likud's behest in sophisticated Western societies; then what you have is the inevitable disconnect.......the peculiar bizzare BS from the figurehead Israeli card board cut out fronts trying to fit the Israeli centric policies into the domestic square pegs..........Bush II America; Silvio Berlesconi Italy; José Maria Aznar/ Spain; Sarkozy/France. In many respects NOT REAL political leaders of sophisticated Western countries, but circus clowns with the ensuing theatrics.
.
But why is Israel Fascist/Nazi orientated, aren't they supposed to be kosher Jews given sanctuary on Palestinian land to appease "Western guilt"?
.
The reason is simple. In many societies it is the extremist/zealot who is more vociferous and assertive, and consequently it is their agenda which dominates the political plain. In the case of Israel perhaps only 30% of Israelis are true Likudniks, but their aggressive political campaigning means that invariably it is their agenda which usually dominates the political discourse in Israel. It is more than likely that the majority of Israelis want PEACE and ENGAGEMENT with the Palestinians (70%). Israelis like all humans are normal people who enjoy going to beaches for a party, or at home enjoying the intimate company of friends and family, over dinner, the simple basic pleasures of life.
.
HOWEVER, the Likud minority do not wish this. They dream of Eretz Israel; an Israel which is ethnically/racially jackboot pure; an Israel which is a superpower, surrounded by dismembered Arab states, which fear Israel and bow to it. Whilst the Israeli military reminds them continually who is master in the region, frequently,viciously with impunity. These Likudnik "FANTASY DREAMS" cannot be achieved through traditional "Kibbutzim Socialism", and so Israel's fundamental ideological base must be redefined, markedly to the right....far xenophobic rabid right....which then absolves you of genocide, mass murder, colonialism, continued illegal wars.......at least to yourself, and your conscience. After that all you do is go to your local Synagogue and the Rabbi blesses you...and its ALL back to normal.
.
This long process started during the 1970's in Israel, and the UK and USA in the 1980's, consequentially linked a little later. Sir Keith Joseph the ideological mentor of Thatcher in Britain in the Conservative party, and in America numerous Jewish intellectuals, such as Milton Friedman, under the Ronald Reagan administration,starting preaching from the early eighties. The Neocons changed their political colors from a Jewish Trotskyite group based in America into a hardline Israeli Likud linked front more recently.
.
In addition Israel is a tiny country of little over 5 million Jews, and there is only so much it can do, surviving on American largess, and significant donations from global Jewry. For it to realize its Likudnik "DREAMS and FANTASY" of empire, it has to exert control over, domination and direction of key Western nations acting as its proxies.........USA/UK being foremost......France, Germany, Spain, Holland and so forth.....this means dominating the political/ideological debate in those countries so that they do the bidding of Likud Israel.
.
This is significantly assisted by the fake narrative of "al-Qaeda" and the open ended GWOT,which is purely a Israeli manufactured fake war.........and a civilisational conflict with Islam......."Israel's enemies are the Wests enemies"........which is of course not the reality; The rulers and elites of the 57 Muslim majority countries are allies and usually always puppets of the West, and not life threatening enemies........Libya and Iran are installed puppet regimes which have been in power unmolested mostly for 40/30 years respectfully...allowed to exist as boogie boogie scarecrow regimes.
.
Finally the Zionist media in the West, with channels such as "FUCK THE NEWS", Washington Post, NY Times, CBS, ABC and CNN setting the debate and agenda of Israel...........Israel would like to buy the British run Al-Jazeera, just to make sure its message is also beamed to the docile Arab people.
.
In such a scenario Professor David Green........evolving over 30 years by Jews with power, patronage, money, criminal intent, greed, the male ego.....militarism..........thoughts of "survival through expansion" ....for Israel to "survive" it must wage perpetual war...........Obama surrounded by Jews from Israel or otherwise (Axelrod/Immanuel)....has his work cut out facing and opposing the extremist right-wing "surge" from Israel which has been on-going for well over 30 years, AND in addition the strength of the Israeli lobby which follows Israel's dictates, AND finally and decisively the Zionist media in America.
.
You need to be a unique individual, and an unique administration to go against such a trend, and thus:

• EITHER, Obama's administration is a card board cut out non-government for 4 years..."Oh look everybody he is black, with a Muslim name as President of America".......Global audience.."Aaaaaawwwwwwww....shucks.....how marvelous............AND, AND , AND", a time filler administration which becomes the fall guy for the next American depression starting in 2010 (a general recession is not inevitable in the USA).........gracefully/obediently ushering in a rabid right-wing government after him in 2012.
• OR, Obama institutes comprehensive policies in both the domestic and foreign policy arena which serves/saves America exclusively, against the dictates of Likud Israel from the background, and which allow's him to serve a second term.

It goes without saying that courage and imagination is required to achieve the second option.

________________________

"Barry In The Bush With Smiles"

By David Michael Green. October 09, 2009 "Information Clearing House"

-- It takes a real artist to render a crushing majority into a hapless political object.

(After being nominated as the Democrat presidential candidate in 2008, presumably the entire party has accepted him as unquestioned dear leader, and that he has attempted to reinforce this with employment for Hilary in key policy posts....amongst others....so he has no worries about his party supporting his policy agenda's as their dear leader. So why this need to reach out to Republicans?.......Is this a style thang?....Is it bearing fruit? )

And Barack Obama is a real artist.

He’s had quite an impressive week. At least for an anvil.

Here’s one New York Times headline, regarding the Olympics debacle: “Chicago Is Rejected in First Round of Voting”. Impressive.

(Not a big deal, unless you are a real Obama hater, out to nitpick.....High time South America was given a chance to stage the Olympics........and the corrupt prone Olympic Committee decided as much. NOT a snub against Obama....just cus an American President makes a presentation/pitch to the IOC that should not automatically entitle America hosting the Olympics)

Here’s another: “Jobless Report Is Worse Than Expected; Rate Rises to 9.8%”. Can you say “Bye-bye, Barack”?

(Cut him some slack dude..........he has been in power for little over 8 months. It would be more accurate to say that the current dismal employment figures are the result of the mismanagement and criminality of Bush II, over 8 years)

Ah, but he was actually just warming up. David Paterson, the governor of New York, bitch-slapped the president for being stupid enough to lean on Paterson to get out of the 2010 race. Paterson is a disaster as governor, and Obama is worried that he’ll drag down the Democratic ticket, lowering the president’s majorities in Congress.

(Exercising his power and authority within his party....and signaling to others in the party that such behavior/standards will not be tolerated)

The first problem with that calculus is that there are fifty states in the union, notwithstanding the natural arrogance of New Yorkers who tend to think they own the planet. The Democratic Party’s problems are far bigger than New York. They begin on one end of Pennsylvania Avenue, and end on the other. As usual, most voters will be using the mid-term elections as a gut-check on their feelings about the current government. If the inept, cowardly and inert Mr. Obama needs someone to resign in order to save the party, that dude in the mirror with the big ol’ grin would be the most efficacious choice. Charlie Cook is now giving the Democrats only a fifty-fifty chance of retaining their majority in the House, which is now a whopping 79 seats. Man, you have to really work at it to blow something that badly in nine months time.

(Rather harsh......lets see what Obama does in the key domestic and foreign policy issues over the next few months, BEFORE the mid-term elections in 2010.......ONLY by then if he loses badly, and he hasn't made any fundamental policy changes which are clearly distinct from the BUSH II junta (where we know he could have made a difference, and had the capacity to do so, but deliberately stalled) can we begin to call him a dud presidency.......just another Jew front........blah blah blah.......a night watchman......before the Jew institutes a real fascist state in America in 2012 for Israel, under a loony right wing fruit cake.)

The second problem with asking Paterson to step out of the race to save Democratic majorities in Congress is that Obama has them already, in lopsided amounts, and he’s not doing a damn thing with them. Instead of kicking some butt to line his own caucuses up and forcing them to pass some real serious legislation that the president demands (see Bush, George W, for illustration. Also, Reagan, Ronald W.; Johnson, Lyndon B.; and Roosevelt, Franklin R.), this fool is doing deals with Republicans who are trying to destroy him, and the very predatory industries that are precisely the problem with American healthcare. I guess he must think that the GOP is just kidding. You know, like they were with Clinton. In any case, why worry about maintaining your majority if you have no intention of ever actually using it?

(In total agreement prof............could be to do with his age, inexperience...his feeling his way around in his new job, his racial background, dare I say it too dazed and grateful for being in the Whitehouse as a black guy. He really needs to implement his programs quickly, soon is not soon enough.......reverse the tax cuts to the rich; health care reform; Education reform and investment; Reform of the financial market; reform of the Byzantine American local and federal tax system; Immigration reform; pull troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan; get a grip on the REAL security budget of America, and cut it; Reform fundamentally the open free trade system of America....do you have something crap and third rate to sell? Then why not sell it to America?; Provides incentives for industry; reform the American media which is now effectively controlled by a few highly biased oligarchies linked to Jews; roll back the security police state instituted under Bush II....)

And the last reason that Obama is idiotic for meddling in state and local politics is because he was sent to Washington to save the country from the sixteen or so serious crises his predecessor bequeathed him, and about all he has going for him is the good will of the public who gave him the job. Spending your time dicking around with who should be the Democratic Party’s nominee for municipal dog-catcher is not exactly what people had in mind when they gave him this mandate. By going to Europe to beg for the Olympics, or by immersing himself in local politics, this chump is spending his political capital at a furious pace. It wouldn’t even be worth the effort if he was getting what he was asking for. But of course it’s far worse that both Paterson and the IOC slammed the door in his face, as publicly and as emphatically as imaginable. If Obama taped a “kick me” sign to his back, he could hardly signal any better his ineptitude and his willingness to get rolled at every conceivable opportunity.

(inexperience and his team?)

There’s more, of course. Another headline reports that “Panel Finishes Work on Health Bill Amendments”. The public option, already a weak sister to any real reform of the predatory wealth extraction system masquerading as national healthcare, was of course voted down by the Senate Finance Committee referred to in the title. Obama has yet to seriously weigh in on any preferences he might have. Apparently he is going to wait until the end of the legislation process. Assuming that he actually has any preferences – and I don’t, unless you count carrying water for corporate power and Wall Street – how astonishingly stupid is that as a strategy? After all the grief and months of effort Congress has gone through to maybe produce a bill, is it conceivable that they’d want to entertain some major new change at the last minute?

Then there’s Afghanistan, where the president has his own general running around painting him into a policy corner with only one option. Any military guy who tried that under Bush got summarily cashiered, even though they were actually telling the truth. You know, like maybe 160,000 GIs weren’t gonna be sufficient to occupy a country of 25 million pissed-off Iraqis. Say that and your career was over, Shinseki-style.

(Yes he needs to be more assertive with the military, and not be overawed by them. Either he cuts the military ops in Afghanistan and Iraq, which gives him loose change to finance his domestic programs....which avoids a recession.....which gives him a chance to be reelected in 2012, and not do badly in 2010......OR.....he substantively or wholly continues with BUSH II policies with marginal teflon tinkering on the periphery...with outlandish public debates dominated by "FUCK THE NEWS".....to give the impression he is actually doing something, when he actually is NOT)

Is anyone else sensing a pattern here?

(The "pattern' will be more patently obvious after the mid-term election results in 2010, and legislatively what he has actually achieved by then)

Obama would make a great nineteenth century president. You know, all those guys with names you can never remember, because they pretty much didn’t really do anything? Back in those days, Congress was king, and presidents – except during wartime – were essentially glorified clerks, executing the Congressional will, as per their Constitutional duty. That’s certainly one way to do it. It’s just that it pretty much isn’t what people have come to want and expect for the last century or so. And it sure as hell isn’t what Obama promised in the election.

(he would look out of place as a "nigger".........Seriously prof. the "decline" in the American constitutional set-up...over 100 years...distinctly beginning with Crypto-Jew Teddy Roosevelt embarking on the American quest for empire from 1898, and the subsequent inevitable road to imperial presidencies can't be blamed on Obama surely. Obama can chip away against that in his little way by disengaging from Afghanistan and Iraq, which he has the authority and choice to do)

But he has really specialized in being an acted-upon object, rather than a political protagonist, despite possessing the most powerful position in the world, commanding majorities in Congress, an initially adoring public wishing him tons of good will, and all manner of crises to warrant if not demand bold action. In his reticence he is not only carrying forward a fine Democratic Party tradition of recent decades, but in fact refining it into an art form. The pattern works like this: Republicans charge like bulls through china shops and grab the mantle of power, proceeding then to ram their program through, no matter the casualties. When they reach levels of greed, corruption and failure so excessive that even comatose Americans can no longer stand it, some effete Democratic stooge named Carter or Clinton or Obama is called in to hold down the fort long enough for the regressives to regroup and start the cycle again. But Obama in action – better rendered as ‘Obama’s inaction’ – makes Clinton look like a litter full of Mike Tysons crammed into an overheated pressure chamber by comparison.

(Beautiful......Democrats Presidents are angels hey? Carter.......Toppled the Shah of Iran 1979, and what the human cost for Iran has been since; began funding Islamic fundies in Afghanistan via Pakistan from July 1979; Toppled the democratically elected Bhutto regime in Pakistan 1977; sanctioned mass slaughter in South Korea in 1980, under/through military rule; South America I'm sure he did some nasty unsavory things there too..........Clinton.....Iraq/sanctions 500,000 children dead; Kosovo.......)

It’s astonishing how Democrats can never seem to block anything the hard-right wants to do, even when they have majorities, while the GOP kills everything the Democrats supposedly want, even with minuscule minorities in Congress. Gee, one could almost get the impression that Democrats don’t really want anything much different from Republicans, but just have to adopt a different alt-persona to hide their intentions from the public. Republicans use guns, god, gays and Gaddafi as distractions from corporate looting. Democrats strap on their cardigan sweaters and try really, really hard to do something, but gosh-darned it, just never seem to get anywhere.

(Reduced to its basic terms the two American parties are run by Jews which are used to ridicule and fool gentile Americans into thinking that they have a real choice, and a measure of say in the running of their country........which is not the case. In that sense the right/left political paradigm over which the professor is fuming about is non existent/fake/pied piper bullshit......is illusion....the only political paradigm which matters in America is the Jewish one, and the needs of Israel....when that reality hits gentile Americans, there will be revolution, and hence the instituting of the American security police state under Bush.......which Obama has not touched, or talked about rolling back/addressing....not one Congress sub-committee has touched that very important area....simple question you know, do Americans want to live in a Jew run security police state or not?)

As for our friend Mr. Obama, he seems busy unlearning every lesson of the last three decades. He doesn’t appear worried that the right will challenge his legitimacy as president ‘cause, of course, they never did that to Carter or Clinton. He doesn’t seem worried that they’ll happily destroy the country if necessary in order to wreck his presidency because, of course, there’s little precedent for that. He doesn’t much care to use the bully pulpit and strong-arm Congress to get what he wants because, of course, that never got Reagan or Bush anywhere.

(Jews operating in the Republican and Democratic party, in Wall Street, in the media could wreck the USA if they are allowed to..........They almost destroyed the $ in August/September 2008 before the emergency team in the BUSH II administration stepped in..........not many Americans are aware of this episode.The Democrats also play a vital enabler role to so called Republican bad guys.....its a elaborate Jew run double act/vaudeville )

I can’t believe I’d ever say this, but the question Obama should be asking right about now, is “What would Bush do?”

I’ll tell ya what. He’d jam his legislation down the throats of the other party, putting the fear of god in them if they dared to oppose the emperor. He’s rip people’s lungs out and stuff them back through their eye sockets if they looked at him cross-eyed. He’d lie to members of his own party and carpet bomb their entire home neighborhoods if they dared vote against him. If any media talking head didn’t tell the lies they were programmed to speak, he’d kidnap their kids and send them to Gitmo, treating them a good waterboarding for every one of their birthdays. And, he’d call in Rove to stomp some people good, the nice Republican way.

(Surely professor you are not seriously suggesting that the Barack Obama administration adopt the style and fashion of the criminally inept administration of Bush II;Katrina and all that; one of the worst in American history...........Having pure political convictions which have evolved over years of meditation and self learning, AND the requisite personal zeal to implement them onto the nation is one thing; working through the correct legal channels, and constitutional channels....HOWEVER using FALSE FLAG OPS IN AMERICA, and Mafia style MO in all areas to institute ones fundamental political objectives in the service of Likud Israel must be deemed ultimately as political "failure" and a moral "failure")

What would that look like? Here’s journalist Ron Suskind relating an inside taste of what he observed while waiting outside the Ol’ Karl’s office for an interview, back when he was running the White House political operation: “Rove was talking to an aide about some political stratagem in some state that had gone awry and a political operative who had displeased him. I paid it no mind and reviewed a jotted list of questions I hoped to ask. But after a moment, it was like ignoring a tornado flinging parked cars. ‘We will fuck him. Do you hear me? We will fuck him. We will ruin him. Like no one has ever fucked him!’ As a reporter, you get around—curse words, anger, passionate intensity are not notable events—but the ferocity, the bellicosity, the violent imputations were, well, shocking. This went on without a break for a minute or two. Then the aide slipped out looking a bit ashen, and Rove, his face ruddy from the exertions of the past few moments, looked at me and smiled a gentle, Clarence-the-Angel smile. ‘Come on in.’ And I did. And we had the most amiable chat for a half hour.”

(Yes I think American popular culture has glorified the MAFIA somewhat. When you are running a vast sophisticated 21st century modern country, working through the accepted channels is the best and only option...........if the actions of the Bush administration is exposed as criminal, then Rove would be termed a failure, and not an object lesson on how to get things done.)

Why won’t Obama do this? Why won’t he unleash all the powers at his disposal, knock heads together, and smash political opponents to smithereens in order to get his way? Two reasons. First, he wasn’t a complete personal screw-up for the last half century, acknowledged even by his own parents to be a total embarrassment. He therefore doesn’t have the burning need to show the world they’ve been wrong about him his whole life, like a certain other fellow recently seen roaming the halls of the West Wing.

The other reason is that Obama doesn’t actually appear to be doing anything that requires any particular toughness. He’s not trying to sell a bullshit war or dismantle Social Security, like Bush. He’s not trying to end legal and institutional racism in a country where it was as pervasive as bibles in ‘Bama, like Lyndon Johnson did. He’s not attempting to bring the country kicking and screaming into the twentieth century, even after it was already one-third over, like FDR was.

In fact, he doesn’t really appear to be doing much of anything, including producing the much-vaunted ‘change’ we heard endlessly about during last year’s campaign. Unless, of course, you count the nice demeanor with which he continues the predatory policies of Reagan, Clinton, and the Bushes. This is essentially George W. Bush’s third term. It’s Barry in the Bush with Smiles.

Obama more or less just seems to want to hang for a while, passively swaying in whatever winds happen to be blowing through at the moment. That might have worked in the 1950s, or even the 1970s, but not today. The brownshirts of the American right have been playing for keeps for some time now. And, while it’s true that they can be their own worst enemy in normal times, these are hardly normal times. Failing to address the real economic pain people are feeling, failing to provide remotely meaningful healthcare reform, failing to clean-up the corporate predators slamming the public with bad mortgages, sky-high credit card interest rates and bailouts of the already rich – all of these are an invitation for some change Obama can believe in, especially in 2012. If he insists on being a political object, the right will gladly turn him into one. It will be a freakin’ anvil too, not the fifth face on Mount Rushmore.

This is not kid’s stuff. These mobsters are possessed of insatiable greed, and they are clever beyond belief at mobilizing the anxieties and inadequacies of a public already dumbed-down to a level of political immaturity that can barely keep pace with the amped-up fires of their personal rage to which it’s dangerously coupled. How many re-run episodes of this mini-series do we need to see before we get clear on how it turns out?

The right is wrong on nearly everything, of course – the elites because they lie, and the shock troops because they’re frightened of their own shadows and therefore find blessed relief in every possible palliative from the pope to Palin. But they are correct about Obama being a complete patsy. They like to bring that up in the foreign policy context, because it’s good for scaring voters, and because it doesn’t remind moderates of just who is actually rolling this punk here at home (a very fine example of which was provided by the cheers that went up from our nice super-patriots when America lost the Olympics bid). But the truth is that a movement that should have been discredited to the point of annihilation by its very own actions is now instead setting the agenda in Washington, and the guy who won the landslide seems busy trying to push the mud back up the hill so that he can be buried by it himself, instead of the people who pretty much literally want to kill him.

(Yes, agreed Obama will need to make his choices soon, and quickly..........being a passive night watchman, who achieved very little, where he could have otherwise with executive ease, will be an inglorious legacy for him which will haunt him for the rest of his life. He simply cannot run America with defacto 4 more years of BUSH II policies. Either he challenges these policies FUNDAMENTALLY, as a Democrat with radical political roots, or he faces the consequences from 2010....and then into 2012 .)

I really don’t know what to say or think about this dude anymore. The way democracy is supposed to work is that his desire to hold office and the public’s preference for certain policies should reinforce each other and impel us toward a mutually satisfying presidency. Instead, though, he trucks along seemingly oblivious to the fact that the exact opposite is occurring.

This country is sinking in every way imaginable, and he will be held to blame in 2010 and 2012.

And so he should be.

It’s just that that will also mean the return of the monster set, absolutely foaming at the mouth after four years in the wilderness not holding the presidency to which they believe they’re fully entitled to own.

And then Obama will join Clinton, running around the world making speeches and writing books. Maybe they’ll even do joint appearances.

Errrum no! Clinton despite the Jewish organized blowjob, ran a two term presidency, where the economy did very well, with good employment rates........Barack Hussain Obama on the other hand, if the economy tanks during his watch, serving just one term will not be forgiven by the majority of American public, with large numbers unemployed................then he will be reminded of his Muslim name, birth certificate, and racial background in very nasty unkind terms......he will disappear from the limelight naturally, into Chicago maybe if they have him back, or Hawaii, or Indonesia, or Kenya.............exceptionally high hopes have been raised in the American public, and he must deliver....or else......The security acts passed under Bush weren't instituted to fight "al-Qaeda" prof. if you know what I mean......The security legislation instituted in America by Bush II aren't being used against "al-Qaeda" on a adaily basis)

Thanks for that, Barack. You’re a real patriot.

Oh well. At least you got the important stuff right.

You won’t have ruffled any feathers while being president.

_________________________

David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University in New York. He is delighted to receive readers' reactions to his articles (dmg@regressiveantidote.net), but regrets that time constraints do not always allow him to respond. More of his work can be found at his website, www.regressiveantidote.net.

The 21st Century and us.

A discussion with Eustace Mullins.

Some scientists have given humans a 50/50 chance of surviving this century leaving out the environmental holocaust factor and/or a stray asteroid hitting us (We had a near miss in December 2001)-------There are about half a dozen 'end of the world is neigh' theories circulating. They have always existed, and they are not new. But as we live in a more 'intense' period of time with instant news and the benefit of the Internet, then such things become/seem much more prevalent than ever before. If we are not optimistic beings then what else can we be? What then is the purpose of existence? Is this not the essence embodied in the youthful as a pose to the old?

Speaking of optimism Americans on the whole are optimistic people as you Mr. Mullins are in relation to a new America arising from the ashes of the old, which is one of the reasons it is such a successful nation. Optimistic people face challenges better than pessimists, but you of course knew that.

There are various 'happy' surveys done by many groups, and on the whole Americans do well, and come out as a generally happy and contented lot compared to a lot of other countries. That is good in certain instances, but bad if it is based on misguided self induced false illusions, and detached from what is really happening in the world. Of course the reality is that America will see some slightly unstable times ahead as a result of the recent poor management the country which America has been experiencing over the last couple of years.

My advice to Americans is avoid the mainstream media---------Doom and gloom merchants par excellence. Their job is to keep you preoccupied with the wrong issue; they of course have an agenda of their own; increase stress and fear over worthless issues, and not feel good about issues that perhaps all Americans should be really concerned about. They have been at it since the start of the Cold War. Mission----- To induce fear and feelings of helplessness in order to control. Switch them off from your life right now ! I am not suggesting cutting our selves off from 'civilisation' and setting ourselves up in a shack in the wilds, that is not productive. As humans we have things to offer to others-----we must live and interact with others.

"Naive hope takes myriad forms and from my perspective one example is the hope that impeachment of Cheney and Bush is even possible."

I am not sure this is practical or possible----the problem is the system that produces leaders like this, or it may simply be the 'natural' products of the wider society. As the saying goes, 'people get the leaders they deserve'. The greater challenge, and therefore far more difficult is to look at the system that produces leaders of this type, and that is not easy.

Pushing these seriously misguided, worthless individuals into a corner so that they do something silly is not productive. We really don't want the rehab clown, and his side kick being at the helm, if World War III starts. Let them pass quietly and quickly. It's only a few more months. Then making sure his clones like Hilary, Obama, Giuliani, McCain and Romney don't get into office with business as usual. Remember the country voted for change in November 2006, but didn't get it.

"Bush quietly advising Hillary Clinton, top Democrats how to keep Iraq war going" by Bill Sammon.

http://www.ziopedia.org/en/articles/neocons%10neolibs/bush_quietly_advising_hillary_clinton,_top_democrats_how_to_keep_iraq_war_going/

The thing to do is fix the system that produces leaders like this, and ask questions like whether all nations go through periods where they elect duds. The instant temporary feel good effect of going after these two, does not guarantee that couple of years later you might still end up with similar characters elected to those positions again.

If impeachment is likely to happen Bush will run to his sanctuary ranch in Paraguay, and Cheney to Israel.These two gentlemen are 'fronts' for bigger forces operating behind them, and by merely pointing at these two, you are being superficial in your political outlook.

You significantly omit the Democrats, thinking all the woes of the nation are the result of the present regime and I would describe that as false analysis. Just because Democrat leaders play saxophones and wear beads on their wrist does not make them 'better', it is just sly PR. The Democrats are no better, or should I say worse------they are complicit in the crimes, but with a smile as a pose to the grimace and macho hard talk of the present regime.

A lot of the problems America faces now internationally were laid by the Clinton regime (1993-2001)-------as I have said before, the present regime is the bit part player in a bigger play. The Democrats are the Israeli party of America---with the 'ah shucks gee smile, lets all hug and why can't we all get along'. In this light the Democrats don't benefit from impeachment, and aren't going to get involved.

That is why people like Kucinich talk, talk and talk about impeachment, until the actual timeline for it is run out. Its a facade and a sham to fool the crowd. Controlled opposition and so on.

" And I must add that Bush has not lost his "brain" with the departure of Rove. Who needs a brain when Darth Vader is the real man behind the curtain and has more political and economic power in the United States government than the average American can even imagine?"

Yes----but the man is human, and he hasn't got everything he wanted------there is some dynamic in the American government; 'ray of hope and light'. His power has steadily declined with the passage of 7 years in office, as more 'within' have become aware of the significant flaws in his ideas. They've had seven years to think about it! And have seen the results since----the real man at the helm lost his marbles quite a few years ago, even before he became Vice -President. One also hopes that there is courage among some of the serving senior commanders of the USA armed/security forces to see the folly of following orders which have no strategic military value for America, and will only lead to the deaths of many more Americans and others needlessly. Not to mention strategic disaster.

http://www.ziopedia.org/en/articles/israel%10palestine/israel_%22in_charge_of_security%22_for_nuclear_power_and_weapons_in_the_us/

That the appropriate security/military/bureaucracy are well versed in the activities of the 'secret government' a.k.a emanating from Cheney's office, after 7 years in power to neutralise his silly acts which will prove a disaster for all in the long run. That such professional men, well versed in their field, are not out maneuvered into following orders which are patently illogical-----helped or otherwise by the American Zionist media, and OBL---always on cue at the right time media wise to 'help' matters in the USA.

" Another example of false hope is faith in the U.S. political system and the possibility that clean elections exist, not to mention the hope that one will even happen in 2008."

It is corrupt and most definitely not a model for the rest of the world, though we have the irony of American statesmen going to other countries to monitor elections, whereas I would like election monitors from outside countries to come to the country with clear access to the entire election system and monitor it well in advance, including the curious American electronic voting machines-----from Norway, Sweden, New Zealand.

Is America a Democracy? I'm not so sure. Only 37% of Americans vote generally in Presidential elections; Another 36% don't give a damn because it makes no difference to them. 22% aren't registered to vote because the system is too complex. 5% of potential voters are illegal aliens living, working and paying taxes in the country---------So the President is elected with slightly over 19% of the vote, from the full potential of voters 100%----------- this is a sham Democracy!

In relation to the two parties, what's the difference between them? It's musical chairs with the same person. The Presidential nominations of each party is usually fixed--------Hilary Clinton because she sucked up to Israel the most, and I think Mit Romney for the Republicans--------carefully monitor the GOP delegate numbers who turn up for debates and the actual votes cast.

"Other "hopes" include: the hope that the Democrats will finally find the courage to stand up to the Republicans. "

That will not happen as the Democrats sold themselves to the devil long time a ago-----it's not their spirit that is misplaced but their bed fellows, and where they get their funding.

Democratic election debates are reasonably representative with 'real' people being allowed to speak and hearing themselves out. Everybody feels good and reassured. Glib smiles and glad hand all around. I watched two summaries of their debates--- actually I liked it, as it talked about real issues that mattered. But! but! but! Once elected Bilderberg Hilary will be transformed into a glazed eyed Stepfordized zombie surrounded by a horde of mysterious Jewish adviser's sounding out the same old phrases as the previous regime-----Bush lite not. The Neocons are already quietly applauding her. A vote for Hilary Clinton, the 'Bilderberger Queen' is a vote for Bush and the continuation of the same policies. The Democratic party needs a revolution, a real revolution from the grass roots if they can organise it.

Eustace have you noticed the sheer volume of candidate debates on the MSM, all sound biting about the same old issues, giving the illusion of democracy, two parties with distinct set of policies, and real choice for the masses.

http://www.ziopedia.org/articles/jewry%10lobby/who_runs_american_politics?/

" that the economy will improve without the working and middle classes being eviscerated by a financial meltdown as catastrophic or worse than the Great Depression."

America is a first world country, and no first world country slides back into the Third World. It never happened, it never will. All first world nations only survive with a significant Middle Class------Your real fear subconsciously Mr. Mullins is that the Jew does to your country what the Jew did to the Soviet Union 1918-91, and Russia under Yeltsin 1991-1997. For that I have no answer, except that you should become more independent of society and alert as to what is going on. Read and be informed of the real issues. Organise peaceful groups to discuss the 'real' issues. Educate others.

But wait a moment. Isn't there a Comrade Commissar Mikhail Chertoff heading the NKVDU, with psychic feelings! He's a Jew? Of Russian origin! Looks vaguely like Lenin doesn't he?-----conscious of this he has shaved the goatee since; too close to reality. Is that supreme irony or dark Jew sarcasm? And what's that you said, that the Neocons origins are Trotskite; Permanent revolution and all that yakytiyak, or is it permanent 100 year wars against Islamo-Fascism! Just hold on there. Isn't that faintly Commie talk from Russia 100 years ago? All Jews, and a few gullible goy stringing along. And the new Attorney -General Muskausky. Enough Jews to start a New revolution.

http://www.ziopedia.org/en/articles/neocons%10neolibs/michael_chertoff%3a_the_man_%26_his_star-crossed_past/

So where are the gulags? Comrades rest assured they are under construction at various locations in the USA. Our first target will be the goy intelligentsia, and then the rest slumped in front of their TV's watching our trash entertainment. We have built up the biggest gulag system in the world here in the USA! We are building emergency units loyal to us which will be trained to round up all the useless goy. Once the emergency war is declared against yet another improbable Islamic foe (Afghanistan 2001, Iraq 2003, Somalia 2006, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt........ I guess it could take a hundred years). The real purpose of all this is the creation of Eretz Israel :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Israel

The fact that America will be bankrupted and destroyed along the way involved in such a long process is neither here or there for them. The fact that many good Americans must die in such a futile endeavour fighting for their mad dream is neither here or there for them. The final cruel irony is that this fantasy of creating an Israeli empire surrounded by little chopped up Muslim statelets, won't be realised, EVER. Why? Hezbollah Lebanon summer 2006, that's why, and the Iraqi resistance, and the Afghan resistance, and so on.

But the question is when will ordinary Americans and their political representatives realise that fighting Israel's wars are futile and worthless. How many more lives must be lost and how many more billions spent before that point is reached? The political leadership in America sadly will not accept the real truth, and the Senate and Congress will continue be filled by men and women of low quality and stature (All societies have such men and women). There will be NO hope from this section, and to continue to hope for real leadership from these people is a waste of time and is an insult to ones self dignity.

Along this painful process of self realisation in America there must be much pain and self reflection. The Jew in order to 'use' America for it's ends will attempt a directorship there, and ordinary Americans should be alerted to this.

They have plenty of experience from the Soviet Union, and guess what to fine tune the system, they have hired the services of Comrade Commissar Markus Wolfe of the former East German Stasi to advise them, and Comrade Commissar Valery Primakov (Jew) of the former KGB----I kid you not !

http://www.ziopedia.org/en/articles/jewry%10lobby/jewish_involvement_in_communism/

"that technology will solve the energy dilemma."

There is no energy dilemma, only that created by the Necon's to increase anxiety to get otherwise rational people to do what they normally would not do-----there is enough resources on the earth to last us well into the next century. On the global landmass, and the ocean seabed. 'Peak oil' is a Neocon theory dressed up as left-wing radical theory to push gullible statesmen (in the USA/UK) to grab the natural resources of the world, when in fact there is abundant evidence that the resources of the world are renewable and bountiful. I even haven't mentioned human ingenuity and what that will do for humanity in the future, and what it has already done. There is no need to bite our nails and grab everything in sight. There is enough, I guarantee you.

http://www.the7thfire.com/peak_oil/peak_oil_introduction.htm


"That there will be a financial crisis soon":

The Jews running up to the last century engineered several financial crisis's in the USA, culminating in the 'Wall street crash' which was carried out by Jewish financiers. Think of it as bowling. You knock down all the pieces with one go, and then you pick up all the pins and place them where and how you want to by your own terms and rules. Such artificial financial crisis's each time reinforces Jewish power in America. Thus FDR was the first elected true Jewish backed President of America and Jewish, surrounded by Jews in key positions, just after the 'Great Depression'. Bill Clinton and Bush are further 'down the road' developments of this long process, because of their utter submissive behaviour towards Israel. Thus cycles of boom and busts are not inevitable but in fact are carefully orchestrated to enhance Jewish power in America.(China has experienced continued economic growth since 1949-----not one financial crisis, since I suppose not many Jewish speculators living there)

http://judicial-inc.biz/Bush_Mossad11.htm

"Why does America, a superpower keep loosing wars, especially since 1945":

By 1945 America had 50% of the worlds GDP. Yet just a couple of years later it struggled to contain a rag tag poorly equipped Third World army of the Communist Chinese, as America didn't properly mobilise and invest enough men and resources to the war. The war lasted 3 years and ended inconclusively in 1953. Then the Vietnam war which lasted 10 years, costing 58,000 lives officially at least, and at a cost of $ 100 of billions of dollars. The American armed forces won every single military engagement with the Vietcong; Tet was a disaster for the VC, but of course you know that America lost the war. That means the military served America, but the government failed with the big picture, and people who runs the government in the USA? Now the Jew wants--------wait for it a 100 years war with you know who. This isn't rational state policy, this is Jew policy designed to weaken America.

"Why are we investing so heavily in Communist China?"

The Jew has weird theories and ideas-----Its a North African religion after all. Sacred brown calf's, sacred wells, Messiah's that never show up, but will one day, just keep your fingers crossed and continue with the donations; ancient (Jew Rabbi's and others) sooth Sayer's who prophesies strange events; any wonder why they are in the fiction business so heavily!................the most vile form of religious obscurantism you can imagine.

Now China is a Communist country, so simple logic would say Americans should not invest too heavily in that country, right? Communism is abhorrent, and it goes against the basic nature of humanity........ Even if China wasn't a Communist dictatorship, it is still a potential real rival to American power. But the Jew has other ideas. You see Communism was a Jewish religion invented by Rabbi Karl Marx, and so like a dead relative which is still deeply cherished as their own in countries where Communism is still practised. The Red Dragon also has strong symbolic meaning for some Jews.--------that's it---that's their logic. Destroy America militarily and economically to help China, but don't hold your breath for their mass immigration to that country, as the Jew loves Occidental society too much. But there is nothing wrong in destroying it, from within. A trully clever master race.

"Why since 1965 is America being flooded with immigrants?"

Others have written better about this issue than I, but in a nut shell it goes like this. Create racial chaos by flooding the country with immigrants. Then get the different groups to fight each other. Whilst they fight each other, and focus on each other, the Jew just tip toes into more power, whilst Jew divides and conquers, using the newly arrivals as tools against the older groups. Now America is a land of opportunity that is made up of immigrants, OK no problem, but not if immigrats are used as a tool to subvert America socially, economically, culturally for the perceived benefit of one group.

Also the repeat of the same piece in pictures----"What world famous men said about the Jews"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhDUfzEOX-w Part I.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoeOVpC0O0w&mode=related&search= Part II

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGWumOKHr6Q&mode=related&search= Part III

It seems the source of the problem is the Jews up bringing and their Talmudic 'religion' originating from North Africa, which states that they are the "Chosen people" and that they can do no wrong. Their religion elevates their earthly self to above everything else; it makes them think they are little Gods worshipping materialism and money. It is not a religion, but merely a DIY manual of 10 easy and greasy ways to take you and the tribe to the very top of society. There is no genius here.

Dismiss the 'liberal' Jew who states that he was not bought up on the teachings of the Torah and the Talmud---4,000 of tribal habit and indoctrination does not disappear over night. Their upbringing in turn creates a megalomaniac view of the self, and then the problems ensue, and over 79 countries covering 3000 years have expelled this North African tribe ------WHY?---Because they are all anti-Semitic right?-heaven forbid that anyone dare to question them except from the fringes, to the fringes. One does not dare to question God's people.

Whilst these Jew games were localised in the past and were a problems for the locals to deal with ----ie. Egyptians BC 1500, to the Russians AD 1900. The present Jewish problem is a global one where the earth and it's multiple other problems all converge. Humanity is challenged enough dealing with conventional global problems without the need to deal with the Jew "Ego".

• Organise yourself in groups and discuss these issues.
  Inform others about these issues casually and carefully. These facts will be difficult for 'first timers' engrossed with Britney spears, TV, friends, cars and fashion----normal human behavior, but we live in certain times and as a First World nation with a high education level our reaction has to be better than third World farmers who have just found out, after, that they have been cheated by MNE's.
  
• GWOT, permanent war empowers the Jews, and harms America obviously because it distracts the non-Jew continuously focused on external threats that are artificially created by them, whilst they are busy consolidating their power in America-----The Jew does not believe in live and let live, or co-existence, though such things may be used by them for political purposes.
  
• That Americans should not become slaves to Jews.
  
• Register with your political party as a member, the Republicans and Democrats, and make your voice heard, and make your vote count in the coming primaries . Be polite but assertive like most good Americans.
  Don't suffer from apathy, 'You have the power' so make it count.