.
.
.
Surreal: Clinton Pledges $45 Million in Aid to Al Qaeda in Syria
By Tony Cartalucci at Infowars.com
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that the US would be
providing an additional $45 million in “non-lethal aid” to the
“opposition” in Syria, reported
the Associated Press.
The Western press chose their words
carefully, ensuring that the term “civilian opposition” was repeatedly
used to describe the armed terrorist forces attempting to violently
overthrow the Syrian government.
Image: Libyan Mahdi al-Harati of the US State
Department, United
Nations, and the UK
Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terrorist organization, the
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), addressing fellow terrorists in
Syria. Harati is now commanding a Libyan brigade operating inside of
Syria attempting to destroy the Syrian government and subjugate the
Syrian population. Traditionally, this is known as “foreign invasion.”
US aid is going to foreign terrorists, not a “civilian opposition.”
….
In reality, the “opposition” in Syria constitutes foreign terrorist
legions flowing across Syria’s borders, and in particular, staging and
crossing over from NATO-member Turkey.
In fact, it was recently admitted
by the terrorist legions themselves that their headquarters has been
located within Turkish territory for the duration of the conflict. In a
recent France 24 article titled, “Free
Syrian Army move HQ from Turkey to Syria,” armed militants claimed
they had only just recently “moved from Turkey to within Syria.”
Clinton’s Aid is Going to Al Qaeda, Not a “Civilian
Opposition.”
While the Western media attempts to portray heavily armed foreign
terrorists as “Syria’s civilian opposition,” it has been revealed that
entire brigades are led by Libyan terrorists drawn from the ranks of
the US
State Department (#29), UK
Home Office (page 5, .pdf), and UN-listed
terror organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).
The presence of LIFG in Syria was first announced by the Western
press in November of 2011 when the Telegraph in their article, “Leading
Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group,” would
report:
Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, “met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey,” said a military official working with Mr Belhadj. “Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan president) sent him there.”
Photo: The face of Libya’s “revolution” was literally Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda’s LIFG commander, Abdul Hakim Belhadj, was NATO’s point man in Libya and has now redirected his terrorist forces against Syria. LIFG commanders are now literally running entire brigades in Syria with Western diplomatic, logistic, and military support.
….
Another Telegraph article, “Libya’s
new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels,” would admit
Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya’s new authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and money for their insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included Turkish officials, the Syrians requested “assistance” from the Libyan representatives and were offered arms, and potentially volunteers.
“There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria,” said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of anonymity. “There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you will see.”
Later that month, some
600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to
begin combat operations and more recently, CNN, whose Ivan Watson
accompanied terrorists over the Turkish-Syrian border and into Aleppo,
revealed that indeed foreign fighters were amongst the militants,
particularly Libyans. It
was admitted that:
Meanwhile, residents of the village where the Syrian Falcons were headquartered said there were fighters of several North African nationalities also serving with the brigade’s ranks.
A volunteer Libyan fighter has also told CNN he intends to travel from Turkey to Syria within days to add a “platoon” of Libyan fighters to armed movement.
On Wednesday, CNN’s crew met a Libyan fighter who had crossed into Syria from Turkey with four other Libyans. The fighter wore full camouflage and was carrying a Kalashnikov rifle. He said more Libyan fighters were on the way.
The foreign fighters, some of them are clearly drawn because they see this as … a jihad. So this is a magnet for jihadists who see this as a fight for Sunni Muslims.
CNN’s reports provide bookends to 2011′s admissions that
large numbers of Libyan terrorists flush with NATO
cash and weapons had headed to Syria, with notorious
terrorist LIFG commandersmaking the arrangements.
LIFG officially merged with Al Qaeda in 2007, but has fought along Al
Qaeda since its inception by the US and Saudis in the mountains of
Afghanistan in the 1980′s. This includes fighting alongside Al Qaeda
most recently in Afghanistan and Iraq against US troops while sowing
sectarian violence, as covered by the US Army’s West Point Combating
Terrorism Center in a 2007 report.
The report titled, “Al-Qa’ida’s
Foreign Fighters in Iraq” stated specifically:
The apparent surge in Libyan recruits traveling to Iraq may be linked the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group’s (LIFG) increasingly cooperative relationship with al‐Qa’ida, which culminated in the LIFG officially joining al‐Qa’ida on November 3, 2007.
The vast majority (84.2%) of Libyans that recorded their route to Iraq arrived via the same pathway running through Egypt and then by air to Syria. This recruiting and logistics network is likely tied to LIFG, which has long ties (not all positive) with Egyptian and Algerian Islamist groups.
The announcement that LIFG had officially sworn allegiance to al‐Qa’ida was long‐expected by observers of the group. Both the ideologue Abu Yahya al‐Libi and the military leader Abu Layth al‐Libi have long histories with the LIFG, and are increasingly prominent figures along the Afghanistan‐Pakistan border and in al‐Qa’ida’s propaganda. Abu Layth is now an operational commander in Afghanistan; and in 2007, Abu Yahya is second only to Ayman al‐Zawahiri as the most visible figure in al‐Qa’ida’s propaganda. The increasing prominence of LIFG figures in al‐Qa’ida’s high command may be a function of the group’s logistics capacity, including its now demonstrated ability to move people effectively around the Middle East, including to Iraq. (begins on page 9, .pdf)
It would now appear that LIFG’s logistics capacity aimed at Iraq
which was previously routed through Syria and Egypt in cooperation with
sectarian extremists, most notably the Muslim Brotherhood based in both
nations, is now being directed exclusively at Syria. LIFG is doing this
with Qatari, Saudi, US, French, British, and NATO support (predominantly
Turkey) after receiving similar support in overthrowing the Libyan
government in 2011.
US Support of Al Qaeda Announced on Heels of US Ambassador’s
Death.
Ironically, the recent infusion of cash and support for Al Qaeda
terrorists by the US comes on the heels of assaults staged by the group
against US diplomatic missions across the region. One in particular,
emanating within LIFG’s
own terror emirate in Benghazi, Libya, would claim the life of US
Ambassador Christopher Stevens. While Stevens’ death was most likely
accidental, (he succumbed to smoke inhalation, and was not killed
directly by militants), it was most certainly the LIFG militias who
dominate Benghazi that staged the attacks.
The purpose of the attacks was to reestablish an adversarial
narrative between the US and regional sectarian extremists after a surge
in public awareness that the two have been working in tandem against
the enemies of the West for years. The US itself would implicate “Al
Qaeda” as being behind the regional attacks for this very purpose,
before continuing their support of the terror organization in its
efforts to overrun Syria.
Image: Bi-partisan treason. Senator John McCain
pictured alongside the now deceased Ambassador Stevens (right, wearing a
blue tie--Democratic Party of the USA; In the UK blue means conservative) had been in Benghazi, Libya supporting Al Qaeda militants
since 2011 and highlight that the US’ current support of global
terrorism is bi-partisan in nature. It does not stem from a “secret
plot” hatched by current US President Barack Obama, but
is merely the latest leg of a singular agenda dictated by
corporate-financier interests that transcend presidencies. The violent
destabilization of Syria in fact began
in 2007 under US President George Bush.
(Well Tony shall we start with the UK, and the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in the1920's....or the UK 's support for the House of Saud, and Wahabism......from the 18th century to weaken the Ottoman empire, or Rothschild minion and super agent Bernard Lewis sent to the USA to indoctrinate the USA, about political Islam, and its usefulness in destabilizing whole societies)
….
West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center 2007 report specifically
mentions the city of Benghazi and nearby Darnah as the LIFG terror
epicenter, stating specifically:
Both Darnah and Benghazi have long been associated with Islamic militancy in Libya, in particular for an uprising by Islamist organizations in the mid‐1990s. The Libyan government blamed the uprising on “infiltrators from the Sudan and Egypt” and one group—the Libyan Fighting Group (jamaŹ¹ah al‐libiyah al‐ muqatilah)—claimed to have Afghan veterans in its ranks. The Libyan uprisings became extraordinarily violent. Qadhafi used helicopter gunships in Benghazi, cut telephone, electricity, and water supplies to Darnah and famously claimed that the militants “deserve to die without trial, like dogs.”
Abu Layth al‐Libi, LIFG’s Emir, reinforced Benghazi and Darnah’s importance to Libyan jihadis in his announcement that LIFG had joined al‐Qa’ida, saying:
“It is with the grace of God that we were hoisting the banner of jihad against this apostate regime under the leadership of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which sacrificed the elite of its sons and commanders in combating this regime whose blood was spilled on the mountains of Darnah, the streets of Benghazi, the outskirts of Tripoli, the desert of Sabha, and the sands of the beach.” (begins on page 12, .pdf)
It is quite clear then, that the NATO-backed 2011 “revolution” in
Libya was merely the continuation of Al Qaeda’s campaign against
Qaddafi, this time assisted by US, French, and British jets and special
forces, with an infusion of Western, Qatari and Saudi cash, “non-lethal”
aid, and weapons.
The West, with a sound understanding of LIFG long
predating their support for Al Qaeda in Libya in 2011, knowingly aided
and abetted terrorists with Western blood on their hands who were
long-listed on various Western foreign terrorist organization lists.
Deceitfully, European foreign ministries and the US State Department
had portrayed these terrorists as “Libya’s civilian opposition,” in
order to justify military intervention and regime change just as they
are portraying these very same terrorists as “Syria’s civilian
opposition.”
Hillary Clinton is handing millions in cash to known Al Qaeda
terrorists, on the heels of these terrorists claiming one of her own
ambassadors in the middle of LIFG’s terror emirate – this while the West
berates Iran for supporting the government of Syria as it attempts to
defend itself against what is clearly a foreign invasion, not a popular
uprising.
While it may seem an act of unhinged insanity – it is not. It only
seems “insane” if one believes the narratives spun by Western
politicians who are attempting to sell their agenda from various, not
always mutually conducive angles.
If one however understands that the
corporate-financier interests of Wall Street and London are
pursuing global hegemony at any cost, the use of Al Qaeda terrorists who
have just led mobs attacking Western consulates across the region that
claimed the life of one of America’s own ambassadors makes perfect
sense.
