.
.
.
.
"al-CIA-duh" deliberately killed over 100 civilians in Syria, to heat up the destabilization of the otherwise peaceful, legitimate, secular, Socialist regime of Bashar al-Assad.
"al-CIA-duh" did the same in Damascus recently to stall UN peace initiatives.
"al-CIA-duh" did the same in Damascus recently to stall UN peace initiatives.
A section of the Western and Jewish security establishment believe that destabilizing moderate Arab regimes, and installing "al-CIA-duh" linked regimes instead in their place gives Israel leverage vis a vi Islamist regimes in Tripoli, Tunis, Cairo, Damascus, Amman, Riyadh.
More Casus Belli to expand the role of NATO/Pentagon as a neo-Crusader force nobly defending little illegal British Empire created geographical strip Israel, with its very unusual borders.
In the realms of security it also cynically brings Israel closer to the West, fighting against mostly Arab regimes in perpetual wars.........which will destroy and weaken Arab countries, theoretically, and create Eretz Israel.....a Jew empire for the first time, and BiBi the first Jew emperor.
The International Jewish media, including the BBC then fabricated the Houla story stating that it was carried out by the Syrian army using artillery, callously massacring its own children.
Then ZOG's in the West expelled their Syrian ambassadors in unison.
The timing of the attack, the concerted propaganda and the expulsion of diplomats over a plain premeditated lie was ominous, and significant.
What Syria needs is Spetnaz's, and other Russian security personnel, and a contingent of 30,000 Revolutionary Guards.....stationed near the Turkish border.
Russia needs to lease military equipment to Syria.
Clearly rationale argument and international law is failing on the deaf ears of the vile International Jew and their WASP lieutenants.
Clearly rationale argument and international law is failing on the deaf ears of the vile International Jew and their WASP lieutenants.
_________________________
West's
Houla Syria Narrative Crumbles, Expels Syrian Diplomats Anyway
UN admits almost all
of the 108 killed in Houla were killed at close range by
militants, not Syrian soldiers firing artillery.
By Tony Cartalucci at Information Clearing House.
The UN according to Associated Press, has stated that, "most of the 108 victims of a massacre in [Houla] Syria last week were shot at close range, some of them women, children and entire families gunned down in their own homes." The UN has also stated that militants, not Syrian soldiers, were responsible for the massacre. The report cites "witness accounts" claiming the militants were "pro-government thugs known as shabiha," while the Syrian government has claimed the militants were foreign-backed armed terrorists.
This stands in stark contrast to the original narrative the US, UK, France and other NATO members have used to accuse the Syrian government for the atrocities, and even as the basis to expel Syrian diplomats. As stated by UK Foreign Office minister Alistair Burt, (emphasis added) "We are appalled at what appears to be credible reports that the Syrian regime has been responsible for the deaths of 92 civilians in Houla, including 32 children. The UN Head of Mission has been able to confirm the numbers and also that artillery tank shells have been used. If this is the case then it's an act of pure, naked savagery and we condemn it in the most strongest possible terms."
Video: UK Foreign Office Minister Alistair Burt peddling what is now a confirmed fabrication, told for days to the public as the West maneuvered to leverage it against the Syrian government. The UN has now confirmed that artillery fired by government troops were not responsible for the massacre, and instead carried out by unidentified militants. Despite this, the UK has failed to retract earlier accusations and has instead expelled Syrian diplomats in an increasingly dangerous, irrational, aggressive posture.
....
Clearly Burt was not reading credible reports, nor has he or his government made any credible attempts to retract their earlier accusations now confirmed to be fabrications. Instead, what the West has done, is distort each new piece of actual evidence that emerges, as the Syrian government and their Russian counterparts struggle to objectively ascertain what happened in Houla, Syria. An example of this comes from the Guardian, who contradicting its own earlier reports, began citing "witness" accounts admittedly provided by Syrian opposition leaders and seemingly custom-tailored to refute the latest evidence presented by Russia before the UN Security Council.
At the moment, only Russia has observed that not enough evidence exists to blame either side, and insists that "the blame must be determined objectively." Paradoxically, the West, who justifies its global interventions and institutions via "international rule of law," seems intent on trying, convicting, and executing the Syrian government as quickly as possible, seemingly desperate to do so exactly before "blame can be determined objectively ."
