Jul 18, 2008

Uniting against Zionism.






Il Presidente al libre from Zionism? Naa!


Conceptually a great idea Bob, identifying the primary problem, and then uniting around it. The left and the right of America should unite against Zionist imperialism, but I am not sure Ralf Nader the mild mannered Arab American is the right guy to fight the good fight for Americans.

Certainly not Kucinich with his one inch shoulders and young nubile love interest half his age, nor Cynthia McKinney-----not what I would describe as outstanding strong characters who have identified the problem of America, and have a clear strategy to tackle it. Most of these people along with Ron Paul have strong Zionist linkages; certainly Ron Paul does......his advisor's, and a lot of his Gold yakitiyak looks like talking points from the Rothschild Jew bible.

You need someone more hardball, committed to the cause, is a little bit more charismatic than Ron Paul who is so dour (you need a leader who shows he empathies with the suffering of the ordinary folks sense of rage and anger)..........without coming across as comical, hysterical and extremist.
Oh yes,......... along with the organizational issue which Ron Paul's campaign has displayed, you also need huge quantities of money to bank roll the message to the average American most of whom live in the Zionist bubble lala fantasy land of cheap porn, cheap entertainment ......cheap food....cheap credit....cheap sex......low education......things designed to destroy Americans and their sense of the true self, that the original founders had imbibed in the young nation.

Maybe Jesse Ventura (get a hair cut otherwise you look like the Jew comic Max Wall, speak more slowly and deliberately, and stop shifting back and forth when you talk ) or Bob Barr (more media limelight needed then there is at present, and co-ordinate with others, alliance)...........and a few million others out there, who have a true understanding of the evil of Zionism, have extensive security backgrounds, and are willing to fight against it constructively, within the parameters set by the Zionists before it goes all Soviet Russia, after a collapsed economy.

Why do you think they are creating lists of suspects of over one million, and the files of 20 million Americans? The Concentration camps around America. The aggressive hairwire triggered police and security........perhaps to deal with Phantom Arabs terrorists? Why was Israel involved in ALL the false flag ops some of which some were deemed anti-Arab but not not all of them-----1993 WTC, 1995 Oklahoma City, 2001 WTC II.

You Americans need to lose the shame of pointing at the Jew and their crimes.........then you have overcome an important psychological hurdle, and makes everything so much clearer thereafter.

_______________________________


A united front to oppose militarism.
By Bob Finch.


Introduction

The ziocons have been behind most of the critical political changes in American foreign policy since the early 1970s and yet, politically, they remained completely invisible for almost thirty years. For instance, the Jewish lobby in America and Israel, were responsible for pushing America and Britain into the first Gulf war. With the exception of Patrick Buchanan’s remarks about the zionist amen corner, no commentator discussed the ziocons’ role in triggering this war or the subsequent sanctions against Iraq. However, America’s invasion of Iraq in 2003 has brought about a significant political change. There has been a dramatic increase in the number of commentators criticizing the Likudnik traitors at the heart of the Bush administration who initiated America’s invasion of Iraq.

The invasion of Iraq has also contributed to the disintegration of the left in both America and Britain. The left has preferred to vote for right wing, pro-war, parties such as the Democratic party in America and the Labour party in Britain, rather than for anti-war alternatives. Radicals ought now to give serious consideration to abandoning these allegedly "progressive" political parties to form an alliance with those on the right of the political spectrum not merely to oppose the Iraq war, and a possible war against Iran, but to combat the zionist elite which is pushing America, and Britain, into more proxy zionist wars.

Iraq Not an Imperialist War

In the run up to the invasion of Iraq, few of America’s military leaders supported the ziocon propositions that american troops would be welcomed in Iraq as liberators and that the country could be occupied with only a minimal military force. American military leaders may have wanted the war to flex their military muscles and to boost American imperial power but they didn’t want it on the terms imposed on them by the ziocons because they believed, correctly as it turns out, they wouldn’t have enough troops to control the country. "This is no doubt a sore spot for the White House: opposition from American's military leaders to the Iraq adventure made headlines in the run-up to war, and their continuing objection to this administration's policy of unconstrained aggression was summed up in the remark of a retired general to the Washington Times: "The Army is just too small for what they want it to do."" (Justin Raimondo ‘Bush Against the Generals’).

The American military was pushed, against its better judgement, into this war by ziocons and is now suffering grievously in terms of military losses and military prestige. There are huge political differences between the Vietnam war and the Iraq war - there were massive anti-war protests throughout the Vietnam war whereas as regards Iraq anti-war protests virtually stopped after the invasion. Militarily, however, the wars themselves are almost identical. In both cases the American military invaded a foreign country and found itself being humiliated by a rag-tag army of volunteers. And everything it does to combat the enemy makes it look even more barbaric. The consequence is that the American military faces the same humiliation in Iraq that it suffered in Vietnam. "The fact that America faces as big a national humiliation as it endured in Vietnam is not one much discussed." (Alexander Cockburn). The war crimes being committed by the American military in Iraq are just as morally disgusting as those it perpetrated in Vietnam. Perhaps it is too much to expect patriotic Americans to be ashamed of the war crimes being committed on their behalf but the world is appalled and revolted by what the American military is doing.

Not a War for Democracy

The idea of exporting democracy to Iraq was put forward by ziocons prior to the invasion of Iraq but it played little role in persuading Americans to support the invasion. The idea became popular only after Al Sistani forced the Americans into accepting the need for national elections in Iraq. The Bush regime started promoting such an idea primarily to rationalize the change in policy that resulted from Sistani’s ultimatum.

The Iraq war is a Zionist Proxy War

There were a lot of arguments against the invasion of Iraq. It is almost impossible for opponents to a war to rally around a truthful, and popular, objection when such a war is being promoted by a flood of state-sponsored lies. National security and intelligence analyst John Prados in his book ‘Hoodwinked’ describes the Bush "scheme to convince America and the world that war with Iraq was necessary and urgent" as "a case study in government dishonesty ... that required patently untrue public statements and egregious manipulation of intelligence." The ziocons knew they could build up an unstoppable momentum for war simply by getting the President and his cabinet to utter a succession of lies to win public approval for their plan to invade Iraq. The reason the American public has turned against the Iraq war is because of these lies e.g. about wmd, have been exposed. It was the ziocons who were primarily responsible for manipulating America into what is a re-run of the disastrous Vietnam war. Most Americans completely failed to spot the blatant deceptions being perpetrated on them by the ziocons in the media and congress. Ziocons, traitors to America, are driving America into political, moral, and financial, bankruptcy. The blame for America’s proxy zionist war against Iraq has got to be laid fairly and squarely on the ziocons and their shabbat goy allies. "The neocons are parasites. They build nothing. They bring nothing. They don't have a foundation. They don't stand for business. They don't stand for ideology. They use a host to facilitate and grow their own power. They are parasites that latch onto oil until it is no longer convenient. They latch on to democracy until it is no longer convenient." (Scott Ritter quoted in Larisa Alexandrovna’s ‘Scott Ritter: Neocons as Parasites’).

The Disintegration of the Left

The disintegration of the left can be appreciated through a number of developments. Firstly, in both America and Britain, the collapse of the anti-war movement. Secondly, in the 2004 presidential campaign in america, many of those on the left refused to support Nader’s anti-war campaign because they believed it was imperative to elect Kerry, a pro-war Democratic candidate, rather than face another four years of Bush. Six months later their British counterparts ended up doing exactly the same thing - voting for the pro-war Labour party. Thirdly, the left’s refusal to organize sanctions against the Jews-only state. Fourthly, the left’s support for the Gaza disengagement charade initiated by the war criminal and terrorist Ariel Sharon. And, finally, the left’s refusal to expose the Israel-first traitors running the American political system.

Is it a coincidence that the left has disintegrated in America, Britain, and Israel? Of course not. Jews dominate the left in all three countries. It is their traitorous commitment to the racist Jews-only state and the so-called peace process, that has brought about this collapse. Basically the Jewish left in America and Britain have been taking their cue from the Jewish left in Israel. Many left wing Jews in America and Britain opposed the invasion of Iraq, but once it had happened they were happy to see the end of Saddam Hussein’s threat to the Jews-only state and the disintegration of Iraq. There is no anti-war protest movement in America and Britain because Jewish left wingers stymie them given that the Jews-only state in Palestine is politically benefitting from the war so much.

The Need to put Anti-Zionism at the top of the Political Agenda

Since the start of America’s zionist proxy war against Iraq, the main political battle has not been between Republicans and Democrats (or, in Britain, between labour and Tories) but between pro-zionists, who want more wars around the Middle East (as well as the expulsion of Palestinians from their homeland) and increasing numbers of anti-zionists.

There are those who believe that only paleo-conservatives such as Patrick Buchanan or Libertarians like Justin Raimondo can counter the political power of the neocons. While there is much to admire in their anti-war polemics they have a marginal political impact on the power of the ziocons. The only way of exposing, and deposing, the ziocons is if the right and left form a mutual alliance. The basis of such a collaboration is to keep the focus on the ziocon establishment which rules America in the interests of the Jews-only state in Palestine.

It is not possible to fight zionism within the Democratic party in America, or the labour party in Britain, because zionist domination is so overwhelming. "The antiwar movement is limping along, and the Democratic Party is desperate to be seen as a "loyal" opposition. Many of its leaders call not for an end to the war, but a war fought with more troops, with greater efficiency." (Alexander Cockburn). If the non-ziocon left want America and Britain out of Iraq (and to stay out of Syria, Pakistan and Iran) then the best way to bring this about is to leave the Democratic and Labour parties.

It has been stated that, "Bush administration neocons such as Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Libby, along with their cheerleaders at Fox "News", the Weekly Standard, Wall Street Journal editorial page, National Review, and the New York Times' Judith Miller will go down in history as the architects and enablers of the greatest strategic blunder in American history. The neocon dream of conquering the Middle East for Israel and destroying Islam as a force is now in history's trash heap of failed adventures along with such miscalculations as Hitler's march into Russia" (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Leave Now’). But until left and right unite to sideline the zionist establishment controlling America, the ziocons will continue to push the world towards world war three.

In the 1980s, the ziocons infiltrated the Republican party until now they control it. Since the 9/11 false flag attacks and the invasion of Iraq, left wing Jews have surrendered to their ziocon Likudnik allies. What this means is that the political priority of both the left and the right should be to challenge the zionist occupied governments of America, Britain, and Palestine, and the zionist occupied parties which sustain these governments. "Regardless of the particular causes or principles that most move us, that are closest to our hearts, no issue is of greater urgency than breaking the Jewish-Zionist grip on American political, social and cultural life. As long as this power remains entrenched, there will be no end to the systematic Jewish distortion of history and current affairs, the Jewish-Zionist domination of the US political system, Zionist oppression of Palestinians, the bloody conflict between Jews and non-Jews in the Middle East, and the Israeli threat to peace." (Mark Weber ‘The Challenge of Jewish-Zionist Power in an Era of Global Struggle’). Unfortunately this sort of alliance seems unlikely given that the traditional left and right seem to prefer to attack each other rather than their zionist masters. The traditional left-right political spectrum has been dead for ages and yet such irrelevance doesn’t seem to stop those on the left and the right from indulging in their politically conventional, slapstick routine. They should abandon the phony liberal-conservative paradigm and unite behind Ralph Nader's independent pro-peace campaign.

The original article is posted at "Wake Up From Your Slumber" and Atheo's blog.