Jul 24, 2008

Air-defense as good diplomacy.



By 1991 the Soviet Union had stockpiled 30,000 plus Anti-aircraft systems, and 17,000 SAMS. A lot of these must be rusting in Siberia in their storage facilities, and those remaining which have not been illegally shipped to Third Countries (The Ukraine run by the Jewish mafia lost its entire Soviet military stock in the 1990's through illegal sales in the black market). Also a good deal of Soviet military hardware has been destroyed under agreements with the USA.





I am looking at Iran's meager air defense systems with 1700 light AA (Where Saddam had 4,000 in 1991) and a handful of SAMs dating back to the purchases under the Shah, and what I can see is a grossly inadequate Iranian air defense system which should be screaming 'don't you dare' to the Israelis but instead looks like a rather weak affair which must be inviting the Israelis in a horny way, 'Come on baby, one more time, Lebanon was a good practice'.

Of course nothing makes sense with the mullah's military strategy conventionally ......they intend to mobilize 20 million children in the event of war..........that should be logistically interesting for a nation of swarthy hotheads, running a failed unindustrialized Third World economy of $650 billion PPP, of which approximately $450 billion is part of the official registered economy........and what are they spending on defense against daily threats, and neighborhood exercises from two of the most powerful ROGUE nations on earth?

................3% on defense, thats right........or at the official currency exchange, just over $6 billion. This is to be expected from the Iranian mullahs installed by the British in 1979.















SA-15 Tor


The Iranians have purchased 30 SAMS from Russia, at a inflated cost of $700 million, with 400 missiles. Whilst such a purchase maybe enough to protect one single target in Iran, given that there are 1500 potential military targets, those 30 systems from Russia don't amount to a hill of beans and seem more symbolic rather than a real boost to Iranian air defense. They will be even more worthless if the 30 SAM systems are spread out throughout the country rather then concentrated in one specific area.


S-300 SAMs.

The Russians are toying with the idea of placing nuclear bomber aircraft in Cuba in response to the very aggressive placement of American missiles around Russia, and especially in Russia's traditional and historical backyard of Eastern Europe, and the Baltic states..........it is a gross provocation of an extreme nature to which Russia must respond meaningfully. If Russia doesn't respond to such direct and naked displays of aggression, then this will be read as weakness by the American Zionist administration, and they will push further and further, and further.........until the day comes where Russia itself is occupied by NATO troops....................I am not a good fiction writer and even if I attempted to write a fiction novel I doubt it would sell more than two copies............but it seems that this is the ultimate strategy of the Zionist American administration......to dismember the whole of Russia for its vast trillion $'s worth of resources.


The Russian strategy of countering this aggressive stance by Zionist America by harking back to old Soviet doctrines is not practical and logical. First and foremost, the Russia of today is not in the same league as the old Soviet Union which was a superpower which unsustainably spent 17-20% of its GDP on defense....hence its eventual collapse under its own weight. The Russia of today has an economy which is less than half of the old Soviet Union, and a rapidly declining population which again is less than half of the old Soviet Union. Placing nuclear bomber planes in Cuba; aggressive military flights against the UK and others; polar military bases; naval maneuvers in the Pacific.......might feel great for a nation feeling increasingly surrounded..........but they have limited utility...........because you are reacting in the manner that the Zionists expect you to react........this is not logical and has limited long term utility for Russia.

What Russia needs is a passive aggressive strategy, and in many ways this is the doctrine Putin has been following, and one hopes the successor to Putin also follows. Russia needs to be passive in the sense that it needs to keep its cool and built alliances with various nations, to secure its position in the world, and focus on Western and Eastern Europe to drive a wedge between the Europeans and Zionist America (It will be impossible to do that with the UK).............Russia must be seen by the rest of the world as a very reasonable power compared to America.

So what about the aggressive strategy which is as vital against rogue America/Israel (We hope Russian strategists understand the nature of American Israeli relationships, and who exactly is running who---the two are not separate) ........putting nuclear bombers in Cuba, aggressive flights against the Rothschild's UK, arctic bases and Pacific naval maneuvers whilst emotionally satisfying in reminding Russians and Americans of Russia's resurgence, they have however very little immediate military value in terms of meeting the actual aggressive postures of America against Russia.

In that sense I think Iran is a theater that requires greater Russian aggressive posturing, which meaningfully meets the aggression and encirclement of Russia by the USA, and their Zionist masters................Iran could at any time become a live battle field, as a pose to theoretical one far way, and right on Russia's Southern backyard. An attack on Iran by the Zionists has real consequences for Russia, and thus Russia should be more focused in this theater; more than any other.

In that sense Russia needs to boost Iran's Air defense system dramatically, and immediately................Iran requires and should get 10,000 AA systems and at least 1,000 SAMS, and perhaps 15,000 SAM.........these should be given on a lease basis, rather than rusting away in remote depots in Siberia. Russian military personnel must follow the systems, training the Iranians on how to use them.......it is virtually useless sending sophisticated equipment to Iran once hostilities begin; training takes time. Iran has plenty of foreign currency reserves, in the order of $170 billion or more overseas assets to pay for these old systems, should they be destroyed in an actual war........however to see such an agreement with Iran merely in terms of business and money would be extremely short slighted. This would be a strategic investment in Russia's long term defense, where Iran is a first line of defense.........before hostilities move into actual Russian territory.

It is the duty and interest of Russia to make the Iranian's understand why they need to lease large quantities of Russian air defense systems and arms now.........and this may not be an easy task given the origin of the mullahs and their often erratic behavior. In this arena the Russian's must exert sufficient influence over and above the influence that the British/French exert over the mullah regime (the historical power brokers of mullah Iran)

Russia must also establish a high command military liaison team with Iran to coordinate the arms forces of the two countries and military logistics in the event of actual war.



Brzezinski and an officer from the 'Raj Punjab acha saab police force' talking about captured arms and training for the Afghan Mujaheddin and later the Taliban.


Looking at the crystal ball it would seem that with the Presidency of Barack Obama, the pressure on Russia will not decrease but increase. His chief foreign and security adviser is Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carters former national security adviser, and the man who together with the British were responsible for toppling the Shah of Iran and installing the mullahs, and arming the extremist fundamentalist Islamic Mujaheddin of Afghanistan, both events from 1979. He is a petty Polish nationalist who has a pathological hatred for Russia, and for these qualities he has been recruited by the Zionist Rothschild network(who also funded the Russian Bolshevik Revolution 1917, and Nazi Party of Germany), and its war against the Russian people and nation, and now he is their tool via the CFR and the Trilateral Commission.













CFR Barack Hussein Obama