Jan 26, 2022

Netaji Subas Chandra Bhose, would have united India under secular rule with no prancing and dancing with Hindu Symbolism

.

.

.

.

He certainly would not have called for ALL city Indians to go back to the village and weave cotton. Pol Pot without the year zero genocide.

AND he didn't sleep with his underage nieces naked for several years.

He didn't call for Independent India to be disarmed and neutral like Norway. He had a passion for the military and fighting. Due to Gandhi's bizarre philosophy, India had no arms Industry until 2010---when a realisation dawned during the Kargil War that there were severe shortages of ammunition and spares, and the foreign suppliers weren't supplying on time.

FINALLY, and most significantly he was not a British Raj agent, unlike so many 'Independence' politicians.

Gandhi from Gujrat was

Nehru was

Mohammed Ali Jinnah, of Brahmin Hindu stock originally from Gujrat. (Ham sandwiches, alcoholism, English speeches to Muslim crowds who didn't understand a word of English, and spending suspiciously long periods practising law in London, in the critical years of the independence struggle, when he should have been in India battling for the Muslim corner (25% of India) inside the Congress Party. Suddenly from nowhere, he parachutes in from London in 1940? and becomes the leader of the MUSLIM LEAGUE PARTY, a top-down party traditionally run by Bengali nawabs.

Muslim League created by the British in Dhaka, Bengal.

RSS created by the British to divide and rule--spent all its energy fighting Indians

Nothing against Gujrat. The state is named after an Aryan tribe called the Gujjars  --raat  Gujjars state. These Iranians came to India from Central Asia on the coattails of the Parthians, whose significant numbers settled in Western India   Maharastra, Gujrat and Sindh.

In conspiracy theory, we can explore and talk about coincidences.