.
.
.
. The Libyan invasion by the 'West' Civil War, chaos anarchy.....yet again the 'West' did not think of the consequences of their illegal action, or even the simple idea of WHO would manage the Third World country after their dirty deed. 7 years have passed...many innocent civilians dead. Slavery has emerged again in the 21st century. An African in Libya faces racial discrimination and attacks. ISIS and 'al-CIA-duh' are every where. Arms from Libya are funneled to the Middle East Islamist's African refugees mass in Libya illegally in the hope of a better life in Europe. The Gold in the country's reserves have been looted by Hilary 143 tons in 2011. $150 billion of the country's petro-dollars in Western banks and investment STOLEN. The oil in the country (The purest in the world--Libyan light crude) have been looted by Western pirates. One of few successes out of the 54 African countries turned into a failed state. These very SAME EVIL BASTARDS---FORSAKEN BY GOD now 'worry' that the legitimate Syrian government and SAA might reunite its country in the North West, and expel ISIS/'al-CIA-duh' finally.
.
.
.
. Hilary will tour the USA rousing the MASSES WITH PURE INSPIRATION, along with Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Diane Feinstein...'The four Yenta roadshow'
.
.
.
. If you aren't interested in the TRUTH OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION then what you do is create an echo chamber of lies, deceit innuendo and guilt BY association.......based on a CIA/FBI counter intelligence operation against the duly elected President of the USA. Mother Teresa watched a movie about the Holocaust, and therefore she MUST be a certified Nazi. He was seen talking to a man with a beard, and therefore he must be an 'al-CIA-duh' member. I understand.......going back to the 1980's how the mind of a faggot in the spook world works, based on paranoia and fear and extreme prejudice. Mr. Paul Manaforte is a Republican Party King maker along with Roger Stone and a group of others going back to the 1970's. The DNC also has them in the CIA and else where.(Obama, Hilary, Clintons....products of the Soros{Rothschild agent Hungarian native} linked CIA......Obama's mom and dad were CIA field agents). The President of the USA isn't elected just by the popular vote, far from it. There is an elaborate sophisticated party machinery which backs their candidate into power. With JFK it was the greasy mob from Chicago.
"The money, muscle and influence of organized crime helped John F. Kennedy win the closely contested 1960 election, investigative journalist Seymour M. Hersh contends in a new book on the Kennedy presidency.
And once Kennedy was inaugurated, Robert F. Kennedy, his brother and attorney general, refused to pursue FBI evidence into widespread voting fraud, Hersh alleges.
In "The Dark Side of Camelot," Hersh claims that the Mafia was brought into the Kennedy presidential campaign--and helped the Democrat carry the key state of Illinois--mainly at the instigation of Joseph P. Kennedy Sr., founder of the family political dynasty.
Onetime Kennedy pal Frank Sinatra also played a part in enlisting the aid of organized crime chieftain Sam Giancana in the struggle for the White House against Republican Richard Nixon, Tina Sinatra, the entertainer's daughter, told Hersh." The Dark side of Camelot
With LBJ it was the Texas Mob and the CIA, who killed JFK. So as DNC King makers you go after the Republican King maker of 40 years.....and harass the rest of the crowd....and somehow through his conviction prove the Russian collusion and the guilt of Donald Trump in that fake collusion...even though Trump had hired Manaforte only for a few months on the best advice of Roger Stone, and got rid of him when there were mere 'suspicions' that he worked for the Russians at one time as a private International Consultant (PRIVATE BUSINESS CAPACITY). Donald Trump has hired many people, who he has subsequently let go......upon reflection and better judgement. And it would seem to appear that open PROVEN real collusion with Russia by DNC members and their contacts, WHILST SERVING THE TAXPAYER (Mueller) is perfectly OK. Julian Assange free to speak in the USA, under no threats or legal action, can give us the TRUTH of RUSSIAN COLLUSION............Finally. As a pose to the Partisan approach of the Mueller Deep State Counter Intelligence Operation, with their STAR PETER STRZOK. (A certified CIA partisan liar) Counterespionage Section Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
The Strzok family hail from Poland, and the northern part of the Mid-West, USA. Poland though nominally Slavic is infact populated by Northern Iranian tribes. ....from the Great Steppe. .....intermingling with Germanic tribes form NW Russia (Indo-Europeans). As with the Polish aristocrat Brzezinski(a Slav racially)....most of Poland seems to have a violent hatred for Russia that appeared with the introduction of Christianity from the Latin World in both countries a mere 1000 years ago. Catholic Poland verse Orthodox Russia--Medieval Religious schism that is IRRELEVANT in the 21st century (Ought to be, should be in the rational scientific modern world.).....The CIA is dominated by Catholics from Italy and Ireland. The religious HISTORICAL proclivities of Poland should not determine RATIONAL LOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE USA and Russia based on some ill-defined Tomás de Torquemada Inquisition from the Spanish Court.
Medieval and early modern instruments of torture
Judas cradle.
Chair of Torture.
The Rack.
Brazen Bull.
Chinese Iron Maiden.
Pear of Anguish.
Dunking.
Boiling.
Does the above have anything to do with the modern USA? A small cabal from the deep state/CIA determining American election outcomes and AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY? _________________________________
Paul suggests granting Assange immunity in exchange for congressional testimony: Report
By Andrew Blake - antiwar.com via The Washington Times -
The Australian Angel of Truth Julian Assange.....never proven to have lied.
"Julian Assange should be let off the hook for releasing stolen material through his WikiLeaks website if he agrees to testify in person before lawmakers investigating his publication of Democratic Party documents", Sen. Rand Paul said in an interview published Wednesday.
“I think that he should be given immunity from prosecution in exchange for coming to the United States and testifying,” said Mr. Paul, Kentucky Republican.
“I think he’s been someone who has released a lot of information, and you can debate whether or not any of that has caused harm, but I think really he has information that is probably pertinent to the hacking of the Democratic emails that would be nice to hear,” Mr. Paul told a writer for The Gateway Pundit site.
Representatives for neither Mr. Assange nor WikiLeaks immediately returned messages seeking comment.
A 47-year-old Australian native, Mr. Assange has been under investigation in the U.S. since 2010 when WikiLeaks published classified diplomatic and military material obtained from the U.S. Departments of State and Defense, respectively. Investigators have more recently taken an interest in his publication of leaked Democratic Party material during the 2016 U.S. presidential race, however, and the Senate Intelligence Committee wrote Mr. Assange earlier this month requesting an interview on the matter.
“It’s probably unlikely to happen unless he is given some type of immunity from prosecution,” said Mr. Paul, a member of both the Senate Foreign Relations and Homeland Security Committees.
According to Professor Steven Cohen Ronald Reagan and Gorbachev met alone for 2.5 hours with just their interpreters present in the late 1980's. In the meeting the men decided to get rid of ALL their nuke weapons.....the DEEP STATE on both sides pushed back on the idea. The CIA surely could have bugged the room........using one of their local dogs. The two men probably discussed the price of Russian hookers in Moscow, since they are the best in the world according to President Putin. President Putin like Donald Trump is a an extremely horny man. My understanding and inside intelligence tells me that they also discussed what plots the CIA was undertaking against President Trump, and how to neutralize them. Finally they discussed how to increase economic cooperation between the two nations, with Senator Rand Paul as the go-between intermediary.
.
.
.
. Such reports have been made before from 2015. On the other hand China may wish to test its MILITARY hardware in a live war scenario, along with Russia. According to Jane's strategic studies report in 2015, there may be between 5--10,000 Chinese nationals either fighting with ISIS, or being trained up to fight with ISIS in NATO Turkey.......with the idea that once these Chinese terrorists were battle hardened, and the mission is accomplished in Syria they will be transferred to AFGHANISTAN, by USA logistics, and then from there threaten Russia in Central Asia (Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kirghistan)..............and Western China. 6,000 ISIS terrorists according to Russian Intelligence has already been marshaled in Afghanistan for such a purpose. These 6,000 ISIS terrorists did not go to Afghanistan through mullah Iran or Pakistan (since 1994 Pakistan HAS BEEN A SPONSOR OF THE Taliban). They were airlifted by the USA, evolving ever more new dreamy wholesome prospects for the good people of Afghanistan........who of-course love having their country transformed into one giant Opium PLANTATION.......courtesy of the East India Company, and hosting foreign forces who perpetuate nearly 40 years of foreign infused strife and mayhem. IT IS CHINA'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DEAL WITH MISGUIDED CHINESE NATIONALS WHO WORK FOR THE CIA..........AND CREATE DESTRUCTION IN OTHER NATIONS. The Syrian army after 7 years of war is not small, with many of its heavy equipment destroyed however. China can therefore provide, Like Russia, heavy artillery support to the SAA. Land based artillery or jet fighters.....showcase to the world what Chinese military hardware is capable of. BUT MOST CRITICALLY......WITH CHINA'S PARTICIPATION in Syria...we may see the first tentative steps of an Eurasian/OBOR/SCO integrated security structure. As I have argued many times important economic cooperation and economic blocks have little meaning if it is not backed by a holistic security structure between member states.
Although China has provided political support to Damascus and is widely expected to play an important role in Syria’s post-war reconstruction, Beijing has so far shied away from offering direct military support to the Syrian Army. Chinese Ambassador to Syria Qi Qianjin has suggested Beijing could soon deploy forces to assist the Syrian Army in its upcoming Idlib offensive, in addition to anti-terrorist operations in other parts of the country. Speaking to Syria’s Al-Watan newspaper on Thursday, the Chinese diplomat said they are monitoring the conflict, adding that the Chinese military “is willing to participate in some way alongside the Syrian Armythat is fighting the terrorists in Idlib and in any other part of Syria.” A source at the Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) told Sputnik reporter Suliman Mulhem he wasn’t aware of plans for China to militarily enter the war, but said the Syrian government “welcomed any support” in its ongoing drive to dislodge terrorists from Syria.
When questioned about the prospect of Chinese forces aiding the Syrian Army in its operation to liberate the Idlib Governorate, Chang said such an initiative “requires a political decision,” without elaborating.
Thousands of hardline Islamist Uyghur militants smuggled themselves and their families into Syria over the course of the multi-year conflict, with the bulk of them ultimately settling in Idlib province, alongside other foreign and domestic jihadists.
The Chinese government is undoubtedly concerned about the fate of these militants, as they pose a threat to China’s national security, but the deployment of a large contingent of forces to Syria would be surprising, especially as the war is nearing its end.
__________________________________- This article was originally published by "Sputnik" -
In a major blow to the Trump Administration’s “cut to zero” effort, demanding the international community stop buying Iranian oil, China has announced that they have no intention of accepting the US demand. They added that they consider US sanctions “counterproductive.”
Presidents Rouhani and Xi
China and India are major purchasers of Iranian oil, and major focuses of the US demands. Iran’s Foreign Minister says that China is particularly “pivotal” to saving the P5+1 nuclear deal.
The US withdrew from the nuclear deal months ago, but the US wasn’t trading with Iran in the first place. This has meant the administration’s focus is on keeping everyone else from trading with Iran, in hopes that it will collapse the deal.
China is a big part of this, with estimates that they buy about 35% of all the oil exported by Iran. Though China is apparently not envisioning raising the amount of oil they’re buying, even not lowering the amount goes a long way toward ensuring Iran stays on the market.
Iran isn’t necessarily losing all other customers either. Sri Lanka has been discussing keeping oil flowing to them, and sending tea as payment. Iran is also courting multiple African countries, notably Ghana, to buy oil and pay with gold.
.
.
.
. Why can't rational educated Americans face up to the FACT that Hilary was/is a horrible candidate. The gravy train can continue running, but without Hilary. In a 'Democracy' the DNC don't need to win 3 elections in a row.
.
.
.
. Equating President Trump with Hippies, flower power, PEACE and Free Love? Whats next? President Trump after over coming some administrative issues in his first year, and more sure of himself embarks on GLOBAL PEACE and COOPERATION. But the 'Liberals' the so called 'Left' and the so called 'Peaceniks' inside the USA become more vitriolic, along with their CIA MOCKINGBIRD MEDIA. What a strange upside down world. ___________________________________
Trump’s Peace Train: Next Stop, Afghanistan
The Christmas truce of 1914 was something truly miraculous. There, in the midst of a vicious war – really the first modern war, in which air power and advanced gunnery both played a part for the first time – the two sides not only laid down their arms, but they also consorted and celebrated the pause in the senseless interminable slaughter. When it was over, they went back to destroying European civilization, but for a moment there a vision of what peace would be like if people took their fate into their own hands was readily apparent. Yes, we always drag out this example, every Christmas, as a lesson in what might be and should be – but could anything like that legendary truce happen today?
Well, it has happened, and in the most unlikely place imaginable – the wilds of Afghanistan, whose stony landscape has absorbed so much blood that I’m surprised the earth itself hasn’t liquefied. As the Washington Postreports:
“A first possible breakthrough in the 17-year Afghan conflict came in June, when a brief cease-fire during a Muslim holiday produced a spontaneous celebration by Afghan troops, civilians and Taliban fighters. The nationwide yearning for peace became palpable.”
Unlike the World War I version, however, it looks like something may come of this spontaneous rebellion against a long and futile war:
“Now, in a development that could build on that extraordinary moment, a senior American diplomat and Taliban insurgent officials have reportedly held talks for the first time, meeting in the Persian Gulf state of Qatar and agreeing to hold further sessions. According to Taliban officials, they discussed reprising the truce in August.”
The US, bypassing the barely functional Afghan “government” — which controls only the territory around Kabul – is negotiating directly with the Taliban, whose leaders are enthusiastic about the talks. While the White House is laconic about the negotiations, the insurgents are more forthcoming: one described the talks as “very positive,” and averred that “We agreed to meet again soon and resolve the Afghan conflict through dialogue.”
The President, you’ll recall, decided to send a few thousand more US troops to Afghanistan with great reluctance, declaring that he’d much rather see them come home: somehow, however, it was supposedly necessary for him to restrain his instincts and surrender to the advice of the military and their attendant pundits. However, it looks like he didn’t give up on the possibility of getting out of America’s longest war – and, in the end, the people on the ground concurred, providing the impetus for serious negotiations.
In this the Afghan peace initiative is much like what’s happening on the Korean peninsula: there, too, the people on the ground who’ve had to live in the long shadow of an outlived conflict spontaneously decided that they’d had enough. Driven in large part by South Korean President Moon Jae-in and North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un, the Singapore summit was the end result of the two native leaders in effect forcing the US to the negotiating table.
Not that the President didn’t play a key role: after all, the US had previously succeeded in quashing the prospects for peace during the Bush II administration, when George W. infamously declared North Korea to be a spoke in the “axis of evil.” That put a quick end to the “Sunshine policy” that the South Koreans had so hopefully initiated.
This time, however, the White House responded positively: Trump, confronted by an invitation to meet Kim Jong-un and kickstart the peace talks, immediately agreed, much to the consternation of his slow-thinking advisors – and the horror of the alleged “experts.” “Oh,” they cried, “you can’t do it like that! You must have endless preliminary meetings and thousands of documents must be passed back and forth and the whole process must be mapped out in advance, down to the last detail.” In other words, the same process that had repeatedly failed over many years must be replicated – and isn’t insanity the expectation that success will be gained by repeating a process that has failed every time?
The Trumpian method inverts this procedure, much to the horror of the “experts”: instead of beginning with niggling little details, the negotiations start when the two leaders meet and establish general guidelines, which underlings are then tasked with implementing. It’s called thinking – and acting – in terms of principles, rather than focusing immediately on supposedly “pragmatic” range-of-the-moment minutiae.
No, Trump doesn’t do things the way everyone else in Washington does, and that’s to his credit in this case. His methods suit the situation, in which he finds himself negotiating with strongmen, rather than, say, the leadership of the European Union. Underlings can talk and draw up all the plans they want, but who can say that the North Korean side speaks for Kim Jong-un? Everything is tentative without the Supreme Leader’s personal imprimatur. Trump’s inverted method gets around this problem rather neatly, and this is also true in the case of the Russians, and, to a certain extent, the Iranians.
Speaking of the Iranians, they are refusing President Trump’s invitation to meet him “without preconditions,” and the media, it seems, is siding with Tehran. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s subsequent comments are being widely reported as supposedly contradicting the President. The Beltway newsletter The Hillreported Pompeo’s remarks:
“If the Iranians demonstrate a commitment to make fundamental changes in how they treat their own people, reduce their malign behavior, can agree that it’s worthwhile to enter into a nuclear agreement that actually prevents proliferation, then the president said he’s prepared to sit down and have the conversation with them.”
What kind of “preconditions” are these? “Reducing their malign behavior”: what does that even mean? There are no specifics, and that’s what real preconditions consist of. On the other hand, the public statements of the Iranian leadership are very precise. The Hill doesn’t report them, but the Israeli media, eager to document Tehran’s intransigence, is more forthcoming. Ha’aretzreports:
“Iran responded to Trump Tuesday, setting two preconditions to a possible meeting. Trump would have to agree to return to the internationally-backed nuclear deal with Iran and also would have to suspend new sanctions against Tehran before any talks, Hamid Abutalebi, an aide to Iranian President Hassan Rohani, said on Twitter.”
Now those are some real preconditions, and they are accompanied by plenty of macho posturing: the Speaker of the Iranian parliament declared that “negotiating with the Americans would be a humiliation now.” The Iranian Foreign Minister likewise deplored the end of the Iran deal negotiated by the Obama administration – which the regime is still adhering to – and signaled that it’s too late (or, perhaps, too early) for talks. Trump, for his part, struck a conciliatory note that contrasted sharply with Iranian bombast: “It’s good for the country, good for them, good for us and good for the world. No preconditions. If they want to meet, I’ll meet.”
Trump also said he thinks the Iranians will come around, and that view is buttressed by the news of an Iranian government shakeup caused not only by the prospect of fresh American sanctions but also by the regime’s crazy economic policies. Inflation is rampant, and the value of country’s currency, the rial, is rapidly falling. The appointment of a new chief of the central bank is in the wings, but that’s not likely to fix anything. As Reuters informs us:
“The rial plumbed new depths on Monday, dropping past 120,000 per U.S. dollar, but Trump’s expressed willingness to negotiate with Tehran sparked a minor recovery on Tuesday, to 110,000 rials on the unofficial market.
“Iranian Vice-President Eshagh Jahangiri said the government and the central bank would unveil a new economic plan by the end of this week to tackle the US sanctions and the rial’s fall.
“Videos on social media showed hundreds of people rallying in Isfahan in central Iran, and Karaj near Tehran, in protest at high prices caused in part by the weak rial.”
In order to placate a restive populace with plenty of free stuff, the authorities have been printing money like there’s no tomorrow. However, tomorrow has apparently arrived. Forbes calculates Iran’s real inflation rate at 203% . As the economy approaches Venezuela-like conditions, the mullahs will no doubt lose the macho and come to the table for the simple reason that it’s in their interests to do so, despite advice from the Western NeverTrumpers. (Does “The Resistance” really think the addition of Iran’s mullahs to their ranks helps their cause?)
Against the Washington wonk-ocracy and the leadership of both parties, this President has launched the most ambitious series of peace initiatives ever undertaken by an American chief executive. That he’s getting little or no credit from our official peaceniks, and furious opposition from the “experts,” is evidence of the very “tribalism” Trump is said to represent. They simply can’t acknowledge actions they would hail as bold and innovative coming from any other occupant of the Oval Office: that’s how narrow-minded and frankly amoral the NeverTrumpers are. And nothing highlights this more than the hysteria that greeted the Helsinki summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
They screeched that it was the “Treason Summit,” and stupidly claimed . Over at CNN and MSNBC, they speculated as to what Trump and Putin discussed: did the President give away “secrets”? Did he give away the ranch? A recent exchange between neocon chickenhawk Max Boot and NYU professor of Russian studies Stephen F. Cohen – in which the former has his head handed to him – illustrates the craziness:
Confronted with someone who actually knows something about Russia, diplomacy, and the history of Russo-American relations, Boot is shown up to be a fool: all he can do is hurl smears at a distinguished academic. Cohen, on the other hand, clearly understands the historic importance of Helsinki and Putin’s upcoming visit to the White House. The leaders of two countries which have thousands of nuclear missiles aimed at each other have the power to end the arms race and eliminate the threat of nuclear annihilation. Nothing is more important than that – and yet the NeverTrumpers are implacably opposed to any such development.
The naysayers will not prevail: that I firmly believe. Trump will triumph in the end for two reasons: (win 2020, and maybe allowed further terms in 2024) 1) Because the American people are sick of perpetual war. Trump, for his part, is no Gandhi: he just wants to get to work on solving our problems right here at home without the expensive distraction of policing the world, and 2) All four of these peace initiatives – involving Afghanistan, Korea, Iran, and Russia – are the result of outlived conflicts, the detritus of a global struggle against an enemy that has vanished.(Yes) All four are the legacy of the cold war, including the conflict with Iran: remember that our 1953 covert intervention that succeeded in overthrowing suspected “communist” Prime Minister Muhammed Mossadegh occurred in a cold war context.
This is why Trump will win, and the carping of the NeverTrumpers will amount to little more than the embittered cries of the defeated. All the structures of the old era are being swept away by the Trumpian tsunami – as they would be in any event, no matter who occupies the White House.
In short: A new era of peace is dawning. Shall I now sing the first verses of “The Age of Aquarius”? Well, why not?
You can check out my Twitter feed by going here. But please note that my tweets are sometimes deliberately provocative, often made in jest, and largely consist of me thinking out loud.
I’ve written a couple of books, which you might want to peruse. Here is the link for buying the second edition of my 1993 book,
+artillery+troops+conduct+live+heavy+weapon+firing+drill.++(6).jpg)
