Torture by the STATE in the UK

.
.
.
.
It is September 1995, the final year of my LL.B.

As part of the final year, all under-graduate law students have to write a 15,000 word dissertation.

I submit my first proposal about 'females, immigration and gender rights'. My overseeing tutor, Will Flavel states the topic is BORING and predictable, along with its conclusions. My second proposal was a review of  'The Intelligence Services Act' (1994). To which he agreed, and we briefly discussed the parameters of the dissertation and the areas I should cover. It definitely covered Northern Ireland and the extra-judicial killings there, and I vaguely talked about chickens coming home to roost. I used secondary material from the Birmingham Central library(one of the best in Europe) and the more limited resources of the university. The first line went like this: 'Trying to control the security services (with parliamentary oversight) is like trying to grab a slippery eel in a bowl full of slime'. March 1996....58%.(immediate audience of 2, where it is marked by another lecturer at the university.)

From the day of submission strange Twilight Zone occurrences happened. Involving police cars, fire brigades and ambulances in Keystone cops mode, and very animated loud moments, including uniformed men on foot. It appeared strange, but I didn't link this to the dissertation at first. 

After that it progressed to gases, micro-wave machines and much more...which ultimately forced me to leave the UK permanently in 2002. No explanation was provided for this beta male, faggotty behavior from the UK STATE, and I am pretty sure it would have been quite colourful and interesting. The aggressive illegal surveillance of a British citizen should not be open ended, and the individual should be made aware through proper channels why they have been under surveillance. However I am also aware of FBI's COINTELPRO PROGRAM's and British Intelligence had an inter twinning relationship with American Intelligence. Echelon, 5-eyes...British spooks spying in the USA, and vice -versa. 

________________________________

British Parliament Confirms 'Conspiracy Theory' - Torture and Renditions Continue

BY MOON OF ALABAMA

On December 13 2005 the British Secretary of State Jack Straw was questioned by the British Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs about illegal "renditions". Straw responded:

Unless we all start to believe in conspiracy theories and that the officials are lying, that I am lying, that behind this there is some kind of secret state which is in league with some dark forces in the United States, and also let me say, we believe that Secretary Rice is lying, there simply is no truth in the claims that the United Kingdom has been involved in rendition full stop, because we have not been, and so what on earth a judicial inquiry would start to do I have no idea.

Those who believed in that 'conspiracy theory' were right, finds the British Parliament:

Britain’s intelligence services tolerated and abetted “inexcusable” abuse of terrorism suspects by their American counterparts, according to a report released by Parliament on Thursday that offers a wide-ranging official condemnation of British intelligence conduct in the years after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
...
The committee documented dozens of cases in which Britain participated in sending suspects to other countries that were known to use torture or aided others in doing so — a practice known as rendition.

There has still not been a judicial inquiry into the issue. The parliament report notes that the British government blocked access to relevant documents and prohibited the questioning of many witnesses the parliament inquiry wanted to hear.

Ambassador Craig Murray, who blew the whistle on British complicity in torture in Uzbekistan, notes:

Theresa May specifically and deliberately ruled out the Committee from questioning any official who might be placed at risk of criminal proceedings – see para 11 of the report. The determination of the government to protect those who were complicit in torture tells us much more about their future intentions than any fake apology.In fact it is impossible to read paras 9 to 14 without being astonished at the sheer audacity of Theresa May’s attempts to obstruct the inquiry. They were allowed to interview only 4 out of 23 requested witnesses, and those were not allowed “to talk about the specifics of the operations in which they were involved nor fill in any gaps in the timeline”.

There is also evidence that the British Intelligence outsourced illegal operations to other countries or agencies:

Although British policy prohibited rendition, the committee found, British agents repeatedly aided other countries in sending suspects to places where there was a high probability they would be mistreated. In three cases, it reported, the British paid, or offered to pay, for renditions; in 28, they “suggested, planned or agreed to rendition operations” conducted by others; and in 22, they provided intelligence to enable a rendition to take place.

The United Nations considers such extraordinary renditions to be crimes against humanity. 

Neither the U.S. nor the United Kingdom has held anyone but a few grunts accountable for their involvement in these crimes.

Murray concludes:

The British state has since repeatedly acted to ensure impunity for those involved, from Blair and Straw down to individual security service officers, who are not to be held responsible for their criminal complicity. This impunity of agents of the state is a complete guarantee that these evil practices will continue.

It seems that impunity is part of the "western values". 

The CIA and the myriad of "special forces" under this or that name continue to use these illegal practices.

The United Arab Emirates were just found to torture random Yemenis in its prisons in south Yemen. U.S. special forces and CIA interrogators are present:

Hundreds of men swept up in the hunt for al-Qaida militants have disappeared into a secret network of prisons in southern Yemen where abuse is routine and torture extreme — including the “grill,” in which the victim is tied to a spit like a roast and spun in a circle of fire, an Associated Press investigation has found.
...
Several U.S. defense officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the topic, told AP that American forces do participate in interrogations of detainee.

Prisoners get isolated, threatened with dogs, waterboarded and more:

They raped detainees while other guards filmed the assaults. They electrocuted prisoners' genitals or hung rocks from their testicles. They sexually violated others with wooden and steel poles.

"They strip you naked, then tie your hands to a steel pole from the right and the left so you are spread open in front of them. Then the sodomizing starts," said one father of four.

The U.S. defense establishment claims that none of its soldiers are "present" when actual torture happens. It also put bridges on sale. The CIA declined to comment to AP.

Some of the chaps the Saudi-UAE alliance or its al-Qaeda allies round up are brought onto (U.S.?) ships off the Yemeni coast where U.S. personal - special forces, CIA agents or their contractors - 'interrogate' these prisoners. To say that they directly torture them is - Jack Straw would say - a conspiracy theory.

Unless some court finally takes up the issues and throws some higher ranking officers and politicians into prison for committing these crimes nothing of this will change.

Rod Rosenstein

.
.
.
.

Congressman Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan

.
.
.
.

American Intelligence Media

.
.
.
.

Unfit Mitt resurrected and warmed up from the crypt to challenge Trump for the CIA/GLOBALISTS IN 2020

.
.
.
.

The highly corrupt FBI

.
.
.
.

Triumphant Trump and nuclear super-power Russia

.
.
.
.

Trump Riding High and Set to Roll the Dice for a Summit with Putin

Riding on the Trump-Kim momentum. Good for him. The fake news media is going to hate it and will go hysterical

By M K Bradrakumar in the Asia Times

If the Trump White House had let it be known a couple of months ago that it was working with the Kremlin to schedule a summit meeting between the two presidents, all hell would have broken loose in the Washington Beltway. But that isn’t happening. There is an eerie calm in Washington, as if Trump’s detractors have run out of ammunition.

What explains it? 

First, the fizz seems to have gone out of the Russia collusion theory. 

Robert Mueller could keep uncovering crimes in American public life (of which there is no dearth) forever but he has not been able to say he has actually substantiated the Russia collusion theory. (and link it directly to Trump)

The latest Pew Research Center analysis on June 20 reveals that only 28% Americans remain any longer “very confident” of the fairness of Mueller’s investigation, while four-in-10 say they are not too sure (19%) or are at all confident (21%) in his ability to do this.

Pew admits: “Republicans and Democrats offer starkly different assessments of Mueller’s conduct of the investigation and Trump’s ability to deal with it, and these partisan differences extend to views of the importance of the investigation itself.”

This partly explains why the cascade of criticism that could have been expected over Trump’s plan for a meeting with President Vladimir Putin hasn’t materialized – although a lavish, televised lovefest is sure to make a mockery of the Mueller inquest.

Fundamentally, Trump has had remarkable success in boosting his political standing among members of his own party. As Susan Glasser wrote in the New Yorker recently: “Increasingly, few Republicans are willing to stand in Trump’s way, even when the President’s policies clash with their own deeply held views.”

The recent lamentation by John Boehner, the former Republican speaker of the US House of Representatives – “There is no Republican Party. There is a Trump Party” – may be an exaggeration that he made while sipping a Bloody Mary on stage at a recent conference in Michigan. Nonetheless, as Glasser writes: “The political reality is simply this: President Trump is now too popular with the Republican base to challenge, even when he appears to be upending policies the party of Reagan has embraced for decades.”

Thus, when Trump presses ahead with a meeting with Putin (which he wanted all along), there is now an air of resignation about it. To be sure, Trump’s dramatic, showy one-one-one meeting with the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un recently has rewritten America’s contemporary diplomatic history. And he rewrote it all by himself while no one back home was even sure whether he should do it.
.

Trump-Putin summit: perfect next act?

.

Russia, of course, is different. But the analogy of the Art of the Deal is still relevant and why should Trump give up on his campaign vision of closer ties with the Russian president without ever testing it? The Russophobes are hard-pressed to find an answer. Thus, it is a fait accompli that as a US president who embraces personal diplomacy with America’s adversaries as his trademark in foreign policy, Trump’s forthcoming summit with Putin becomes a perfect next act.

Did Trump work towards this? The point is, he’s an inscrutable politician. It wasn’t mere coincidence that just before leaving for the recent G-7 summit in Canada, he would think up the unthinkable – Russia’s return to the grouping. The seemingly stray thought actually gets bracketed with his move to abandon the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the vital underpinning of President Barack Obama’s ‘pivot-to-Asia’ strategy.
.

The common thread is that Trump’s Art of the Deal means putting the focus on America’s interests rather than on the negating of adversaries’ legitimate interests or concerns – be it North Korea or Russia. Of course, if there is an uncomfortable overlap, a deal becomes necessary and Trump believes in his ability to negotiate it.

So, Trump essentially took at a pot shot at the West’s containment strategy against Russia by raising the G7 petard. Meanwhile, on a parallel track, the spadework began for a successful summit between Trump and Putin. Of course, there are so many fault lines in the overall relationship and anything can go wrong between now and the summit. The Kremlin can ensure that there is no “sabotage” from the Russian side, but that cannot be said for the Trump White House.
.

An announcement on the Trump-Putin summit in the second week of July is due any moment. From available indications, the meet will come after Trump’s participation in the NATO summit in Brussels on July 11-12. Trump is also facing resistance from the US’ European allies who fear “exclusion” from a potential US-Russia rapprochement. And the resistance to detente in the US and in Europe coalesces. Yet, Trump’s strategic asset is that with a high popularity rating of 50% he is at his strongest position today politically and could do things pretty much as he always wanted.

The best sign so far is that a three-member group of Republican senators comprising Richard Shelby (Alabama), John Neely Kennedy (Louisiana) and John Hoeven (North Dakota) is visiting Russia in early July on a “reconnaissance mission.” Historically, Moscow preferred to talk with America’s “hawks”. And the good part is that the Trump administration is sponsoring the lawmakers’ visit.

Moderate, Socialist, Secular Syria is fighting 'al-CIA-duh'/ISIS terrorists which are backed by the USA

.
.
.
.
Baghdad is aware of this fact but there are USA forces in Iraq and the current government is a puppet of the USA......even as the USA kill Iraqi forces near/in Syria (who are there to support the Syria government)

Iran is aware of this fact, also, but its focus is on saving the 2015 civilian nuclear deal. The long waited evidence of USA special forces serving with ISIS.....  from Iran has yet to materialize. The puppet mullahs were brought into power by the CIA 1977-1979.

Russia is aware of this fact, but is focused on improving good relations with the USA, and keeping Israel happy (There is a powerful Jewish Deep State in Russia since the time of the Bolshevik Revolution and centered around the old guard of the former KGB)


One time head of the KGB and a Jew, Yuri Andropov

The USA military is doing this as a favor to Israel and the right-wing Likud government of Benjamin Netanyahu.

_____________________________________________

Syria - Damascus And Its Allies Prepare To Remove U.S. Forces From Al-Tanf

By Moon of Alabama

On June 8 we asked if the then ongoing ISIS attack on Albu Kamal was part of a U.S. plan:

There is sneaking suspicion that the U.S. directed the ongoing ISIS attack on Abu Kamal to gain control over the crossing and to disable road supplies from Iran through Iraq into Syria.
...
The U.S. must be given no chance to use the ISIS pretext to take Abu Kamal. The Syrian government must rush to support its forces in the border city. It must immediately request that Iraqi forces cross the border from Al-Qaim and support the endangered Syrian troops.

Some reinforcement came in and Albu Kamal was soon back in Syrian government hands. The Syrian army also launched an operation to destroy ISIS positions in southeastern desert.

Southeast Syria (red: Syrian Army, green: U.S. zone around al-Tanf crossing to Iraq, grey: ISIS, yellow: U.S./Kurdish SDF) bigger

But U.S. interference in the east continued:

The Russian military is warning of a false-flag "chemical incident" in Deir Ezzor governorate. The Syrian Observatory reports that Islamic State remnants in the southeastern desert and in the Rukban camp, both under cover of the U.S. occupied zone around al-Tanf, prepare for a large attack on Syrian government forces. It claims that such an attack is an attempt to occupy the zone between al-Tanf and Albu Kamal at the Euphrates. Both operation would be planned diversions intended to draw Syrian forces away from Deraa and could provide excuses for U.S. intervention on the opposition side.

Late Sunday an airstrike destroyed a building in the Harri area near Albu Kamal directly on the Syrian-Iraqi border. The building was used as a headquarter for the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces (PMU) who are securing the border in coordination with the Syrian army in the fight against the Islamic State. More than 20 fighters were killed and more than 10 were wounded. This may have been in preparation for the reportedly planned large ISIS attack.

Another serious incident followed last night when U.S. supported Maghawhir al-Thawra "rebels" (which include 'former' ISIS fighters) attacked Syrian government forces:

A Syrian army officer was killed in a U.S strike on a Syrian army outpost near a U.S. base close to the Iraqi-Syrian border, a commander in the regional alliance supporting President Bashar al-Assad told Reuters.

The Pentagon, said, however, that a U.S.-backed Syrian rebel group stationed in the Tanf garrison had engaged on Thursday evening an “unidentified hostile force” outside a “deconfliction zone” around the garrison, forcing it to retreat. It said there were no casualties on either side.

The Syrian Observatory claims that eight Syrian soldiers were killed in the attack. There is some footage of a desert chase with "technicals" that is supposed to be from these clashes. They took place in al-Halba, 70 kilometers northwest of al-Tanf and only 50 kilometers from Palmyra.

The U.S. sent "rebels" it trains at al-Tanf outside its self declared 55 kilometers deconfliction zone around Tanf to attack Syrian government forces. It supported them by air strikes. U.S. special forces are said to have taken part. This is likely the case as only U.S. special forces can call in such airstrikes.

It seems obvious that the U.S. is using ISIS, U.S. trained "Maghawhir al-Thawra" rebels, and its air power in another attempt to cut the land route between Syria and Iraq. It wants to use the upcoming Syrian campaign against al-Qaeda and ISIS in the southwest around Daraa to make a new move in the east.

But Syria and its allies will not allow that. They are building up their own forces in the east. As Elijah Magnier reported yesterday:

[D]uring my visit to the city of Palmyra and its surroundings, the presence of thousands of Russian troops is striking, indicating that Moscow is sending new infantry and special forces in very large numbers. This large presence has not been announced.

The Syrian army is also sending additional forces into the area and more Iraqi Popular Mobilization Units have arrived in the Al-Qaim/Albu-Kamal area.

Syria and its allies obviously decided to counter the U.S. move. Their operations at the Syrian-Iraqi border are coordinated by the common operation room in Baghdad.

bigger

Last night Syria, Iraq, Iran and Russia again discussed the situation in the east and made their decision:

SURA @AlSuraEnglish - 23:47 UTC - 21 Jun 2018#BREAKING - #Iraq, #Syria, #Russia and #Iran confirm new mission to secure the #Iraqi-#Syrian border from all terrorist groups. The mission was devised in the operations room in Iraq's capital, #Baghdad.

 via Sura - Iraqi, Syrian, Iranian and Russian officers in the operations room Baghdad - bigger

"All terrorist groups" include the Maghawhir al-Thawra "rebels" and their U.S. protectors at al-Tanf.

Meanwhile the Syrian army continues its preparations for the large attack around Daraa which might bring it in conflict with Israel.

bigger

The U.S. again issued a nonsensical warning against such an attack but with a significant change in its wording:

The statement, however, omitted a line in a past statement on the subject that said the U.S. would take “firm and appropriate measures” if Syria violated the de-escalation measure.

It has been confirmed that Iran will not be involved in the fight in Daraa (We had noted thatthree weeks ago.) Hizbullah special forces might take part in the areas near the Lebanese border. Jordan reinforced its position on its side of the border. It is unlikely to join any fight but it will want to keep fleeing "rebels" from entering the country.

The operation in the southwest around Daraa will proceed. The U.S. attempts to use the occasion to cut Syria from Iraq in the east will be prevented by the new Baghdad operations room mission. Its high time for the U.S. to give up on its nonsense schemes in the southeast. The humanitarian situation in the Rukban camp near the U.S. positions in al-Tanf is catastrophic and the civilians there want to come back under Syrian government control. The al-Tanf position is indefensible against any larger force. The U.S. forces there can still move out without a fight. If they do not leave voluntarily, force will be used to remove them.

The FBI COUP against President Trump

.
.
.
.
.


'Outcome determinative bias'....no such phrase cooked up by Trey Gowdy.

However such bland bureaucratic phrases do desensitize and anesthetize REAL CRIMES and would be better phrased by direct legal terminology as High Treason or Sedition, which are punishable by the death penalty.

AND these TREASONOUS and SEDITIOUS criminals still working in the FBI and DOJ, supported and paid for by the taxpayer?..........along with their Q security clearances and access to the highest state secrets of the state through their current positions. 

Lets talk about something more mundane, and significant ...the 25 assassination attempts against President elect Trump with 63 million votes (or a landslide if the Globalist media was more balanced)....most of these assassination attempts were by the FBI.....WORKING for the Globalist. The FBI itself dose not decide who to hate.

So, who will face consequences for this Treason and Crime?

I think it is not correct for Trey Gowdy to qualify EVERY INVESTIGATION of FBI crimes with the unfounded prayer that the rank and file of the FBI is staffed by 'Fine upstanding Americans'. (3)

When the FBI convicts an Italian mafia boss in Noo Yawk we do not say for the sake of courtesy, balance and apology...'BUT, the rank and file of the Olivetti pizza mafia syndicate are fine upstanding pillars of the community....and GREAT patriotic Americans working hard and batting for America.'

We do not say that the Stazi but for Markus Wulf were staffed by fine up standing pillars of the community---turning every 5th East Germans into state spies, including agent Dorothea Merkel/Krasner.


Untermensch!

We do not say that the GESTAPO, but for Heinrich MUELLER (related to Robert Mueller) was staffed by fine up standing pillars of the community ---as they organised the death and murder of 6 million Jews (1937--45)....who would later join the ranks of the CIA.(The CIA which transported the original Hitler to Argentina in 1944)

Finally buried in a Jewish grave site in Old Berlin: 

'Born in 1900 and decorated in the First World War, Mueller became a policeman before Heydrich recruited him to the SS and Gestapo. He attended the 1942 Wannsee Conference which laid out the “final solution” - the plan to exterminate the Jews. Professor Johannes Tuchel described Mueller as a “bureaucrat” who, from behind his desk, “was responsible, with Himmler, Hitler and Heydrich for a lot of mass crimes, was deeply involved in the Holocaust, attended the Wannsee conference and was also responsible for the mass killings of Soviet prisoners of war”.

Mueller, who ran the Gestapo secret police before and during World War Two, was last spotted in Adolf Hitler’s bunker in Berlin the day after the Nazi leader committed suicide in 1945.

We do not say that the SS, but for Heinrich Himmler (not related to Robert Mueller) was staffed by fine up standing pillars of the community ---as they organised the death and murder of 6 million Jews (1937--45)....who would later join the ranks of the CIA.(The CIA which transported the original Hitler to Argentina in 1944)

Roger Stone at Infowars

.
.
.
.

American Intelligence Media

.
.
.
.


Ying-Yang balance

The Genius of Trump--Honesty and Truth

.
.
.
.


YES--President Trump 'bringing in the sheep' is an important MISSION, but it would be a lot easier if you didn't surround yourself with billionaires, deep state swampers, Bush Nazi-era Warmongers, Christian Zionists, Deep State Generals and Republican Rhinos, aging octogenarians.....people with deeply held ideological puritanical beliefs and deep pocket interests paid for by others.

Then we can believe that Henry Kissinger didn't pay you a visit in November 2016 at the Whitehouse with a list of people that had to be hired courtesy of the Rockefellers.

Finally, that Jared Kushner is removed from the Whitehouse and is no longer fetted as the next President in waiting ......with his Orthodox Jewish beliefs, his beta male ways and his highly corrupt practices with the Jewish mafia in NY, and Israel.

The people you can rely on are the old friends of 30--40 years like Roger Stone et al...and the Trump loyal stormtroopers who are not billionaires, deep state swampers, Bush Nazi-era Warmongers, Christian Zionists, Deep State Generals and Republican Rhinos and aging octogenarians.....people with deeply held ideological puritanical beliefs and deep pocket interests paid for by others.

The appointment of such people like billionaires, deep state swampers, Bush Nazi-era Warmongers, Christian Zionists, Deep State Generals and Republican Rhinos, aging octogenarians.....people with deeply held ideological puritanical beliefs and deep pocket interests paid for by others.....when they disappoint the Presidency again, again and again...makes everything suspect and suspicions as to Trumps real intentions.

So you say you are fighting a lone battle........OK so get your loyal troopers in......FREE JULIAN ASSANGE who was central and critical to your success.



ITS SUNDAY

Trumps Triumph

.
.
.
.

Singapore Summit: A Victory for Peace

A stinging defeat for the War Party

by Justin Raimondo at antiwar.comPosted onune 14, 2018

You could hear the cries of anguish and the gnashing of teeth emanating from Washington, D.C., and the isle of Manhattan, as the media and the political class mourned the coming of peace to the Korean peninsula. Max Boot, one of the primary leaders of the anti-Trump “Resistance,” declared that “For Kim Jong-un this is already a victory because he wants legitimacy, he wants a place on the international stage, he wants to be recognized as an equal by the president of the United States, he wants to seen as nuclear power, and he’s achieving all of that. This is a tremendous propaganda victory for him.”

This summarizes the reaction from the anti-Trumpers, who apparently really do believe that Kim derives his legitimacy from factors outside North Korea, and specifically from recognition by Americans, i.e. themselves. The narcissism of these people would be comical if it weren’t so dangerous.

This folderol about being “recognized as an equal” is similarly humor of the unintentional variety: does anyone, including Kim, really believe that a poor, isolated, and desperately poor regime is really the equal of the world’s sole “super-power,” no matter how many photo ops are taken with POTUS? Of course, they don’t.

Does Kim want to “be seen as a nuclear power”? But of course North Korea is indeed a nuclear power – are we supposed to ignore this? And what about this “tremendous propaganda victory” – just how tremendous is it? Is it convincing the world’s peoples that the North Korean system is superior to liberal democracy? Nope. Quite the opposite: Kim has been driven to negotiate because his own system is failing.

Well, enough of refuting the easily refutable Señor Boot: what’s scary is that the “progressives” in the mass media and the thinktanks are repeating the same party line. Nancy Pelosi recovered long enough from her impending Alzheimer’s to denounce the summit as a bunch of “vague promises” with no “clear and comprehensive pathway to denuclearization and non-proliferation.” She continued:

“In his haste to reach an agreement, President Trump elevated North Korea to the level of the United States while preserving the regime’s status quo.”

Take a gander at this photo of Nancy greeting Saudi despot Mohammed bin Salman, whose regime beheads gays and doesn’t allow women to drive: she’s practically genuflecting at his feet! How’s that for elevating the undeserving?  Chuck Schumer said the summit “legitimized a brutal dictator” – and, no, he wasn’t talking about Salman, whom he met with. While a very few left-wing Democrats are supporting the President’s peace initiative, the party in general – and I mean the base – is viscerally hostile. And that comports with their rapidly evolving foreign policy stance, starting with their unhinged Russophobia: such are the consequences of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

So what did the summit accomplish?

First and foremost: it took place. For the first time, an American president and a North Korean leader sat at the same table and talked. The precedent – loathed and denounced by our War Party – means that this frozen conflict is slated to rapidly thaw.

Secondly, contra the nattering nabobs of negativity, the North Koreans are clearly committed to denuclearization: it is bluntly stated in the joint communiqué signed by both Trump and Kim. Critics are noting the lack of specifics, but that is for the diplomats to iron out: agreement on fundamentals is the natural prerequisite to a binding agreement.

Thirdly, the North Koreans made a number of concessions before the summit even began: they stopped testing nukes, they stopped testing ballistic missiles, they withdrew their opposition to the presence of US troops in South Korea, and they released three American citizens who had been held in captivity. Trump, for his part, ended the military “exercises” that take place annually on the peninsula and said he’d like to withdraw US troops from the South.

The War Party is horrified: one of their most stable and longstanding scams is in danger of being brought to a well-deserved end: just think of all the economic and political interests that have a stake in maintaining this relic of the cold war. They’re all being threatened now, and that accounts for the chorus of outrage that has greeted the Korean summit.

Most outraged of all is the Washington Post, which, in league with the “intelligence community,” has embarked on a crusade to oust this President. In an editorial, the Voice of Bezos avers:

“A joint statement said Mr. Kim ‘reaffirmed his firm and unwavering commitment to complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.’ That language is actually weaker and less specific than what Pyongyang offered in several previous agreements – which it then flouted. North Korea’s definition of denuclearization, as laid out in numerous previous talks with U.S. officials, envisions a far-reaching US strategic retreat, including the removal of the American defense umbrella from both South Korea and Japan.”

Those previous agreements were all reached with Kim Jong-un’s predecessors, his father, Kim Jong-il , and his grandfather, Kim Il-sung: is it conceivable that the third Kim may be a different kettle of fish?

Surely this is so: Kim Jong-un has recently declared an end to the “military first” policy of his government, and redirected resources to the economic well-being of his people. He purged the military of hard-liners in preparation for the summit, and internal North Korean propaganda augurs an opening to the West that is unprecedented in the history of the “Hermit Kingdom.”

The hatred directed at the President for pioneering this peace initiative is truly amazing to behold: and it transcends all political categories. Even the supposedly anti-interventionist Cato Institute got in the act, although they’ve been degenerating under the War Party’s pressure for quite some time now. In Washington, D.C., war is the preferred alternative: peace is always an outlier.

Our President, however, represents the American people, not the Beltway, which is why he’s despised by the political class. It is precisely because he is the kind of President who will meet with the North Koreans, and call for withdrawing US troops from the Korean peninsula, that the “intelligence community” (i.e. the vanguard of the War Party) is determined to overthrow him. This is why James Clapper, John Brennan, and all the rest of the Deep State – and their foreign allies – are out to destroy this presidency. Trump is challenging the Empire – and that means he’s going after the bread-and-butter of a privileged class, the vast bureaucracy that manages and is always seeking to expand American hegemony across the globe. It’s an empire that doesn’t benefit the American people – only that thin sliver of it that owns “defense” industry stocks and benefits in some way from our foreign policy of global intervention.

The Great Horny sage from India.

Trump’s pronouncements at this summit sounded like a mix of Mahatma Gandhi and Mother Theresa: “Anyone can make war,” he told the assembled media, “but it takes courage to make peace.”

We couldn’t have said it better ourselves.

Finally, the significance of this historic summit is more than even Trump is claiming. The key to understanding this is in a video that was made by the Trump administration especially for Kim Jong-un. The brief but dramatic footage shows the history of US-Korean relations through the prism of war, subsequent confrontations, and the tragedy of a country divided. It also shows what could be: a modernized prosperous North Korea at peace with its neighbours, with gleaming skyscrapers and happy well-fed people – in short, a vision of what North Korean socialism promised but was never able to deliver.

All of which leads us to ask: what is being negotiated here? It’s not just about the North’s nukes: there’s no reason to hold out a utopian vision unless you’re trying to sell something much bigger and broader.

I believe – and I think our intelligence services recognize this – that Kim Jong-un is going beyond even what Gorbachev did, which was to make peace with the US without integrating into the West. My view is that the North Koreans, under Kim’s leadership, are taking a radical new turn: they want to abandon the old “Juche” system and join not only the international community but the Western world. In short, they want what South Korea has: an alliance with the United States.

This is completely consonant with the history of North Korea, which has always sought to balance competing foreign interests against one another in order to maintain their independence. During the heyday of communism, they deftly manoeuvred between the Soviets and the Chinese, favouring one and then the other, and avoiding domination by either.

Today they face the same conundrum, only with slightly different players: this time it’s China and the US. They are approaching the latter because the far enemy is less dangerous than the near frenemy. Just look at the logistics: an American attack on North Korea, while possible, is improbable given the projected casualties and the objections of the South Koreans, who would suffer incalculable losses. A Chinese “intervention,” however, is quite possible, and the recent history of Pyongyang’s relations with Beijing underscores the relative likelihood of this scenario, given the right circumstances.

Remember: Kim Jong-un executed his own uncle because he was accused of canoodling with China (to his own profit), and then had his half-brother – who was under Chinese protection in Macao – assassinated using a virulent poison. In both cases, the Chinese factor was dispositive. Despite all the uninformed noise – including from Trump – about how China and North Korea are allies and bosom buddies, the opposite is the case: they hate each other. Kim’s grandfather, Kim Il-sung, the founder of the dynasty, regularly denounced the Chinese “Cultural Revolution,” and the Chinese under Mao were equally dismissive of their Korean “comrades.” And whatever resemblance to classical Marxism-Leninism the “Juche” (self-reliance) doctrine of the North retains is purely accidental: there are no statues of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin in North Korea. And don’t forget: the Chinese not only joined with the West in imposing sanctions on Pyongyang, they went the extra mile and sanctioned the North even more strictly than the US and its allies.

It’s easy to see how China could absorb North Korea: the US, on the other hand, is not about to conquer and colonize that country. Yes, the North fears American might, but they have good reason to loathe the Chinese more.

So what does all this mean?

For two full years I’ve been advancing my thesis of the Great Change: that we have entered an era of transition, not only domestically but also in the international arena. The last remnants of the cold war order are disintegrating before our eyes, and new arrangements are taking their place. Those who presided over and profited from the old order are angry that the seismic shift is endangering their pelf and privileges, and they are screaming bloody murder at the “craziness” of a President who doesn’t play by their rules. What they don’t realize is that their day is over – or, perhaps they do realize it, and this accounts for the virulence of their attacks on this President.

“Oh, how can you say Trump is the peace President – look at John Bolton!” My critics were certain that the Bolton appointment meant the beginning of World War III – hysteria being their natural state. These whining ninnies have now been shown up, and the paucity of their “analysis” is plain for all to see. Certainly the Korean people see it: they support the summit and the negotiations by a whopping 80 percent. Americans, too, support the summit, despite the 24/7 anti-Trump anti-summit propaganda being broadcast by our sick media. Yes, they are very sick with the disease of war mania, brought on by a near terminal case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

This summit is a victory for peace, a smashing triumph for the Trump administration, and a beacon of hope for us here at Antiwar.com. The War Party, angry and grumbling at this huge setback, is in retreat: peace is breaking out on the Korean peninsula, and there isn’t a damned thing they can do about it.

Yes, the Koreans drove this process: President Moon Jae-in deserves much of the credit. But if not for Donald J. Trump none of this would be happening – and it’s driving the NeverTrumpers crazy. That’s because the anti-Trump movement in this country is increasingly tied to the War Party: they are in fact the same.

All of which goes to show that I was right about Trump, the naysayers were wrong – and the success of the Singapore summit proves it.

Rosanne Barr

.
.
.
.

The Jewish Neocon London Rothschilds Jihad against Russia needs to end.

.
.
.
.
President Trump is very LOGICAL, but he faces the enormous obstacle of the London Rothschilds, and especially Lord Goofy Jacob Rothschilds who has a thing about Aryan nations.


If Trump does not put any CONDITIONALITIES on any such meeting this summer in the Whitehouse with Putin...then why not?

A meeting without preconditions this summer with Russia, and 2 great diplomatic master strokes by Trump before the November elections.

It does not bear mentioning that Russia is a faaaaar more important country than North Korea-----WITH REAL CONSEQUENCES, and President Trump will be able to give a forefinger to his opponents in America who use vicious lies to soil his good reputation with spurious allegations of collusion to explain Hilary's predictable defeat.

Then only then should he get his Noble prize along with Kim Jong-Un and President Putin.

AMERICA WILL BE great again, AS WILL THE WHOLE WORLD.




___________________________________________________

Russia Is 'Isolated', 'Doesn't Make Anything', 'Nigeria With Nukes'. But Trump Says G7 Spends 25% of Time Talking About Her

John McCain once described Russia as a "gas station masquerading as a country". How strange that G7 should spend so much time talking about a gas station

By Russia Insider.

The leaders of the G7 group spent a lot of their time during last week’s summit discussing Moscow, and so having Russia itself at the negotiation table would have been an extremely logical move, US President Donald Trump has said.(agreed)

“You know, we spend probably 25 percent of our time talking about Russia, and I said wouldn’t it be better if they were here,” Trump said, in an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier, adding that “I'm not for Russia. I’m for the United States.”

Spend so much time talking about her they might as well invite her to join says Trump

President Trump made headlines last week after stating that Russia should be invited back to the gatherings of the Group of Seven industrialized nations. “They should let Russia come back in because we should have Russia at the negotiating table,” he suggested, ahead of the 2018 G7 summit, held in La Malbaie, Quebec, Canada.

 

Speaking to Fox, Trump explained his position, noting that Russia's presence in a group consisting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States, would allow these countries, and especially the world’s two biggest nuclear powers, to not just discuss but actually to address the pressing issues of the day.

“Now I think I would probably have a good relationship with him or I will be able to talk to him better than if you call somebody on the telephone to talk,” Trump said, referring to Vladimir Putin, in an interview on board Air Force One. “I will tell you, as an example, if he were at that meeting I could ask him to do things that are good for the world, that are good for the country, that are good for him.”

The US is not alone in seeing Russia as a partner that should be talked with, Trump pointed out, noting that Italy’s new anti-elite Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte also wants Moscow back at the table. Besides Conte, German Chancellor Angela Merkel also voiced her support for Russia's return, but only if the roadmap to a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine is fulfilled. “I can imagine Russia’s return. But first of all we need to make progress in implementing the Minsk agreements,” Merkel told ARD in an interview on Sunday, omitting the fact that Kiev itself is largely to blame for prolonging the crisis.

Back in 2014, the G8 members boycotted the summit in Sochi scheduled for June and ‘suspended’ Russia′s membership. The group, however, stopped short of a permanent expulsion of Russia from the club. Following Trump's statement on Friday, Vladimir Putin reiterated that G7 members are always welcome to reconsider their boycott and come to Russia.

“As for Russia’s return to the G7, or G8: we did not leave it. Our counterparts refused to go to Russia for well-known reasons. However, we will be glad to see everyone in Moscow,” Putin said, during a state visit to China.

Russia “never asked to be allowed back” to the Group of Eight, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov had earlier noted. “When our western partners decided to return to the G7 format, we accepted their decision and have been working on other platforms since then,” including the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), BRICS and the G20, Lavrov explained.

The Scythian's--from the Danube to Vladivostok 800--200 BC

.
.
.
.