The gossip says the JEWSA threatened Jordan with the so called 'Arab Spring' if it did not cooperate with the JEWSA/Israel against Syria. (training/arming 'al-CIA-duh' to be sent into Syria)
CIA Muslim Brotherhood members are now quiet in Jordan after a brief recent flurry of political activity.
Jordan is now a major hub, along with Turkey for training 'al-CIA-duh' terrorists and murderers in Syria, with the assistance of the USA, UK, Israel and other Western security experts.
One major problem is never solved by voluntarily associating with another major problem; it will in the long term make matters ONLY worse for Jordan.
ALSO....Morally it is wrong to spread war, destabilization, death, rape, suffering in other countries.
Strategically/politically due to spill over effects, it is wrong to spread war, destabilization, death, rape, suffering in other NEIGHBORING countries.
As a fellow Muslim country it is wrong to spread war, destabilization, death, rape, suffering in another Muslim country.
To be sure Jordan as a Monarchy is unique, created artificially, after the Arab Bedouin betrayal of the Ottoman Empire in the Great War. Sunni Arab troops remained loyal to the Ottoman army to the last. The King of Jordan is half English, and speaks excellent English. But he is STILL the King of an ARAB people, where the majority are Palestinian. It is a fragile concocted state, propped up by the CIA, and occasional foreign mercenaries from Pakistan.
But this much is true. If 'al-CIA-duh' wins in Damascus, it will be Jordan's turn next. The King with his family, and a 1000 suitcases will then have to flee to London, and live a comfortable life in Mayfair, or maybe Nightsbridge along with with all the other British puppets. From London he will see his country destroyed, minorities attacks; ethnic wars deliberately incited by the CIA, between the Bedouin and the Palestinians refugees, and of course EVENTUAL NATO/USA/Israeli invasion to "maintain peace and order"....Iraq style.
YOU CAN NEVER GET NORMAL FUNCTIONING GOVERNMENT FROM 'al-CIA-duh' DOMINATION and rule.....YOU DO NOT BELIEVE ME OH KING!.....look at Afghanistan, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Pakistan, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia....SYRIA.
But puppets are puppets, they must obey their master even though they suspects that what they do is harmful to their country, and EVENTUALLY to themselves. Puppets are often weak debased characters, with psychopathic criminal tendencies.....traits which make them easier to control.
The Shah of Iran was one such character. His father Colonel Reza Khan was brought to power by the UK in 1921 to consolidate the UK's hold over that country, AND because he was a secret illiterate Jew originally from the Caucasus (Most of the Caucasus have been part of Persia for 3000 years, and are inhabited largely by Iranic people). The family settled in Tehran after the Russian advanced into that region in the 18th/19th century in various Russo-Persian wars.
The Shah was a prince regent between 1941--1950, and was officially brought into power by the CIA/MI6 in 1953 for the sake of British Petroleum.
He obeyed his puppet masters 100%.
SAVAK the secret police was created by the CIA/MOSSAD. The Shah never knew how many CIA agents, Mossad agents or British agents were in his country working within the Iranian military, security, bureaucracy and education system.
He launched the White Revolution in 1960 to quickly modernize his country.....The British and Americans advised against it. Iran's first steel mill was built by the Soviet Union in 1965, and its first machine tools factory by Czechoslovakia.........not the USA or the UK.
The Shah wanted everybody in Iran to have Ph.D's......and it became a metaphorical slogan for the country's White Revolution......unrealistic, but a dream of what the future Iran would be, could be like...well educated, well informed modern and prosperous. The emancipation of women. A country with a Western secular legal system........Land distribution to the poor. Good diplomatic relations with Israel. The Shah gave huge parts of his own land to poor people. The UK/USA advised against it DIRECTLY to the puppet Shah, AND in addition also USED/ACTIVATED one of their most prominent agents in Iran, Mullah Ruhollah Khomeini supported by the British/USA, who then on their orders and FINANCE launched a nationwide campaign against the White Revolution.
The Shah naturally wanted to put the rogue mullah into prison, as he was inciting Iranians into violent street protests, involving himself. General Hassan Pakravan, head of SAVAK who worked for the CIA/MI6 conspired with the mullah elite and promoted unqualified Ruhollah Khomeini into a Grand Ayatollah. This ecumenical procedure basically meant Ruhollah Khomeini was now untouchable by the law (By the way the puppet mullahs do put Grand Ayatollahs into prison).
Then General Pakravan suggested exile where Khomeini was first sent to NATO/Doenme Turkey, and from there to CIA Saddam's Socialist Paradise Iraq.....then to Paris finally, whilst the CIA/MI6 conducted the Islamic Arab Spring in Iran between 1978/79.
The puppet Shah brought huge quantities of USA/UK arms......whereas this money could have been used more wisely developing Iran's own arms industry with the help of the Soviet Union, Comintern East European countries including Tito's Yugoslavia, and some West European countries (West Germany especially). It is to be noted that huge amounts of corruption was generated by the military contracts with the USA/UK..............they ALWAYS DO!...AND WASTE OF MONEY.....a rich country can waste money, but a poor country cannot. EXAMPLE: buying the over sophisticated 80 F-14 Tomcat at $4--6 billion at 1973 prices, whereas for the same price with proper negotiations, 400 F-15' could have been brought for the same price.
The puppet Shah refused to clamp down on Islamic Fundamentalists in his country, but instead concentrated on Communists. This was the advice given by the CIA, who ran SAVAK.
The Shah under American pressure released nearly ALL political dissidents in 1977, who then went on to organized the revolution of 1979.
The Shah under American pressure imprisoned his best allies within the government, and put them in jail to please the Americans/and the CIA mobs.....towards the end of his rule (1977--1978).
The Shah refused to mobilize the Iranian military to stop the insurrection/revolution, as advised by the Americans to be careful about human rights....THE CIA TERRORISTS COULD DESTROY PROPERTY AND DESTABILIZE THE COUNTRY, BUT THE SHAH ACCORDING TO AMERICAN ADVISE COULD NOT RETALIATE AND PREVENT THIS DISORDER! To reinforce this the USA sent in GENERAL Huyser......."You guys just sit on your hands whilst the CIA rent a mobs and terrorists take over and destroy your country"
One of the first things the CIA puppet mullahs did upon coming to power was execute most of the Iranian generals in Kangaroo courts, run by mullahs...no due process of course......a mad litany of lies and accusations were shouted at them, and then the rope.
The Shah found refuge in Egypt....an Arab country run by a CIA agent, Anwar Sadat, who had made peace with Israel.
This is the little anecdote for the King of Jordan, Abdullah. ....enjoy the cooperation with the USA. You may even feel self important now, "in the in crowd" "in the in club" cooperating with the Neanderthal Criminal bastards, but beware of what could happen to YOUR country.....soon after.
Then, after that cryptic Jewish signs won't help you.
As the objectives are far greater then your little desert country:
Jordan: Rebels Training Here Are Secular, Will Counter al-Qaeda
by Jason Ditz, at antiwar.com
Syrian rebel sources say “dozens” of people were killed in the capture of the Um al-Mayathen garrison, the center of Syrian Army defenses in the Daraa Province charged with controlling the border area.
Jordan’s Information Minister commented earlier on the matter, saying that they are making sure the US is only training “secular” rebels in their country, adding “Jordan can’t sit idle and watch al-Qaeda and other militants seizing control of its common border.”
Backing the secular portion of the rebellion as a counter to al-Qaeda is a strategy a lot of regional officials have backed, but with the al-Qaeda-backed portions doing much of the heavy lifting across Syria, they seem to be either propping up secular auxiliaries for them or setting the stage for yet another religious civil war if and when the current one ends.
World Must Unite Against US-Saudi-Israeli Proxy War in Syria
By Tony Cartalucci
- US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel have conspired to destroy Syria by way of arming sectarian extremists since 2007.
- The West now admits it, along with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, have provided thousands of tons of weapons to militants in Syria - while also conceding that Al Qaeda's Syrian franchise, Jabhat al-Nusra is the best armed, most well equipped militant front in the conflict.
- US, Saudi, Israeli-backed terrorists are now committing a myriad of horrific atrocities against all of Syria's population, including Sunni Muslims - meaning neither "democracy" nor even "sectarianism" drives the conflict, but rather the destruction of Syria in its entirety.
- US State Department acknowledges Syria faces threat from Al Qaeda, demands blockade of arms/aid from reaching government to fight terrorists the US State Department admits are present in every major Syrian city.
Such attacks included a mortar bombardment of Damascus University, killing 15 and injuring dozens more, as well as the brutal slaying of two prominent Sunni Muslim clerics - the latest of which was beheaded, his body paraded through the streets of Aleppo, and his head hung from the mosque he preached in. While the West attempts to mitigate these events by labeling the victims as "pro-government," the reality is that the forces fighting inside Syria are funded, armed, directed, and politically supported from abroad - and therefore do not represent any of the Syrian people's interests, including those Syrians who do not support the government.
It is abundantly clear that the West's goal is neither to institute "democracy," nor even take sides in a "sectarian conflict," but rather carry out the complete and permanent destruction of Syria as a nation-state, sparing no one, not even Sunnis.
Such a proxy war exists contra to any conceivable interpretation of "international law." The world is left with a moral imperative to not only denounce this insidious conflict brought upon the Syrian people, compounded and perpetuated entirely by external interests, but demands that concrete action is taken to ensure that this act of aggression is brought to an end.
The US, UK, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have admitted to colluding together, flooding Syria with thousands of tons of weapons via Jordan to Syria's south, and NATO-member Turkey to Syria's north. And in an otherwise inexplicable conundrum, while the likes of US Secretary of State John Kerry insist this torrent of weapons is being directed to "moderates," neither the US nor its allies are able to explain why Al Qaeda terror front Jabhat al-Nusra has emerged as the most heavily armed, best equipped militant organization in the conflict.
AP reported specifically in their article, "Officials: Arms shipments rise to Syrian rebels," that:
US Secretary of State John Kerry said on the sidelines of a Syrian opposition meeting in Italy last month that the weapons are ending up in the hands of secular groups. "I will tell you this: There is a very clear ability now in the Syrian opposition to make certain that what goes to the moderate, legitimate opposition is in fact getting to them, and the indication is that they are increasing their pressure as a result of that," he said, without elaborating.But even AP admits that:
Syrian opposition activists estimate there are 15-20 different brigades fighting in and around Damascus now, each with up to 150 fighters. Many of them have Islamic tendencies and bear black-and-white Islamic flags or al-Qaeda-style flags on their Facebook pages. There is also a presence of Jabhat al-Nusra, one of the strongest Islamic terrorist groups fighting alongside the rebels.The US State Department's own statement regarding the designation of al-Nusra as a listed Al Qaeda terror organization states:
Since November 2011, al-Nusrah Front has claimed nearly 600 attacks – ranging from more than 40 suicide attacks to small arms and improvised explosive device operations – in major city centers including Damascus, Aleppo, Hamah, Dara, Homs, Idlib, and Dayr al-Zawr.According to the US State Department, al-Nusra is carrying out hundreds of attacks with a wide array of weaponry, across the entire nation of Syria, indicating a massive front and implying an equally massive network of logistical support, including foreign sponsorship. What's more, is that the US State Department acknowledges al-Nusra's presence even in cities close to Syria's borders where the CIA is admittedly overseeing the distribution of weapons and cash. The New York Times, in their June 2012 article, "C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition," reported that:
A small number of C.I.A. officers are operating secretly in southern Turkey, helping allies decide which Syrian opposition fighters across the border will receive arms to fight the Syrian government, according to American officials and Arab intelligence officers.And in New York Times' more recent March 2013 article, "Arms Airlift to Syria Rebels Expands, With Aid From C.I.A.," it is admitted that weapons are being funneled into Syria across both its borders with Turkey and Jordan:
With help from the C.I.A., Arab governments and Turkey have sharply increased their military aid to Syria’s opposition fighters in recent months, expanding a secret airlift of arms and equipment for the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad, according to air traffic data, interviews with officials in several countries and the accounts of rebel commanders.The article would also state:
The US State Department acknowledges that the well armed, prominent terror front al-Nusra is operating in the very areas the CIA is feeding weapons and cash into.Although rebel commanders and the data indicate that Qatar and Saudi Arabia had been shipping military materials via Turkey to the opposition since early and late 2012, respectively, a major hurdle was removed late last fall after the Turkish government agreed to allow the pace of air shipments to accelerate, officials said.Simultaneously, arms and equipment were being purchased by Saudi Arabia in Croatia and flown to Jordan on Jordanian cargo planes for rebels working in southern Syria and for retransfer to Turkey for rebels groups operating from there, several officials said.
Image: (Left) West Point's Combating Terrorism Center's 2007 report, "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq" indicated which areas in Syria Al Qaeda fighters filtering into Iraq came from. The overwhelming majority of them came from Dayr Al-Zawr in Syria's southeast, Idlib in the north near the Turkish-Syrian border, and Dar'a in the south near the Jordanian-Syrian border. (Right) A map indicating the epicenters of violence in Syria indicate that the exact same hotbeds for Al Qaeda in 2007, now serve as the epicenters of so-called "pro-democracy fighters" and also happen to be areas the US CIA is admittedly distributing weapons and other aid in.
Such a reality directly contradicts the US State Department's official position, and no explanation is given as to how "moderates" can be provided with such extensive support, and still be eclipsed militarily and logistically by terror-front al-Nusra. That is, unless of course, the US, British, Saudi, and Qatari weapons aren't simply just handing the weapons directly to terrorists, precisely as planned as early as 2007.
The Destruction of Syria Began in 2007, Not 2011
While the West has attempted to reclaim Syria as part of its sphere of influence for decades, concrete plans for the latest proxy war were laid at least as early as 2007. It was admitted in 2007 that the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel conspired together to fund, arm, and direct sectarian extremists including militants "sympathetic" to Al Qaeda, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood, against the governments of Iran and Syria. In Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh's 2007 New Yorker article, "The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?" the conspiracy was described as follows:
To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.Hersh also cited US, Saudi, and Lebanese officials who indicated that, "in the past year, the Saudis, the Israelis, and the Bush Administration have developed a series of informal understandings about their new strategic direction," and that, "the Saudi government, with Washington’s approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir Assad, of Syria. The report would also state:
Some of the core tactics of the redirection are not public, however. The clandestine operations have been kept secret, in some cases, by leaving the execution or the funding to the Saudis, or by finding other ways to work around the normal congressional appropriations process, current and former officials close to the Administration said.Mention of the Muslim Brotherhood already receiving aid even in 2007 was also made:
The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, a branch of a radical Sunni movement founded in Egypt in 1928, engaged in more than a decade of violent opposition to the regime of Hafez Assad, Bashir’s father. In 1982, the Brotherhood took control of the city of Hama; Assad bombarded the city for a week, killing between six thousand and twenty thousand people. Membership in the Brotherhood is punishable by death in Syria. The Brotherhood is also an avowed enemy of the U.S. and of Israel. Nevertheless, Jumblatt said, “We told Cheney that the basic link between Iran and Lebanon is Syria—and to weaken Iran you need to open the door to effective Syrian opposition.”The Wall Street Journal in 2007 would also implicate the Muslim Brotherhood and more specifically, the so-called "National Salvation Front," in its article, "To Check Syria, U.S. Explores Bond With Muslim Brothers."
There is evidence that the Administration’s redirection strategy has already benefitted the Brotherhood. The Syrian National Salvation Front is a coalition of opposition groups whose principal members are a faction led by Abdul Halim Khaddam, a former Syrian Vice-President who defected in 2005, and the Brotherhood. A former high-ranking C.I.A. officer told me, “The Americans have provided both political and financial support. The Saudis are taking the lead with financial support, but there is American involvement.” He said that Khaddam, who now lives in Paris, was getting money from Saudi Arabia, with the knowledge of the White House. (In 2005, a delegation of the Front’s members met with officials from the National Security Council, according to press reports.) A former White House official told me that the Saudis had provided members of the Front with travel documents.
It is clear that the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel planned to use sectarian extremists against the nation of Syria starting at least as early as 2007, and it is clear that now these sectarian extremists are carrying out the destruction of Syria with a massive torrent of weapons and cash provided by the US and its regional allies, just as was described by Hersh's report.
A Moral Imperative to Save Syria
Syria is under attack by an insidious, premeditated foreign assault, intentionally using terrorist proxies in direct and complete violation of any conceivable interpretation of both national and international law. The world has a moral imperative to support the Syrian people and their government as they fight this assault - both politically and logistically. While US Secretary John Kerry is unable to account for how his nation's support for moderates has left Al Qaeda's al-Nusra front the premier militant faction in Syria, he has demanded that Iraq help stem the flow of alleged aid Iran is providing the Syrian government as it fights these terrorists.
Does US Secretary of State John Kerry deny that Syria is fighting a significant (and continuously growing) Al Qaeda presence within their borders, which according to the US State Department's own statement, is operating in every major city in the country? What conceivable explanation or excuse could be made to justify the blockading of aid sent to Syria to fight Al Qaeda terrorists? In fact, why isn't the US aiding the Syrian government itself in its fight against Al Qaeda - a terrorist organization the US has used as an excuse to wage unending global war since 2001 when Al Qaeda allegedly killed some 3,000 American civilians?
Does Secretary Kerry believe that further arming "moderates" is a legitimate strategy to counter Al Qaeda's growing presence in Syria when these "moderates" openly defend Al Qaeda's al-Nusra? The US' own hand-picked "Syrian opposition leader," Mouaz al Khatib, demanded the US reconsider its designation of al Nusra as a terrorist organization. Retuers reported in their article, "Syrian opposition urges U.S. review of al-Nusra blacklisting," that:
The leader of Syria's opposition coalition urged the United States on Wednesday to review its decision to designate the militant Islamist Jabhat al-Nusra as a terrorist group, saying religion was a legitimate motive for Syrian rebels.
"The decision to consider a party that is fighting the regime as a terrorist party needs to be reviewed," Mouaz Alkhatib told a "Friends of Syria" meeting in Morocco, where Western and Arab states granted full recognition to the coalition seeking to oust President Bashar al-Assad.The US is directly responsible for the emergence and perpetuation of Al Qaeda and other extremist groups in Syria. The statements of Secretary John Kerry are made merely to maintain an increasingly tenuous "plausible deniability." The precedent being set by the US and its allies is one of using full-scale proxy invasions, that if successful in Syria, will be directed into Iran, up through the Caucasus Mountains in Russia, and even onto China's doorstep via extremists the West is cultivating amongst the Uighurs. It is also clear that the West is directly responsible for the extremists within their own borders, and that these extremists are being used as a political tool against the people of the West, just as they are being used as a mercenary force abroad.
A united front between nations against this wanton state sponsorship of terrorism is needed - with nations pledging political and logistical support to the Syrian people to defeat this open conspiracy. Individually, we can identify, boycott, and permanently replace the corporate-financier interests who conceived of and are driving this agenda. Failure to stop such wide scale criminality against the Syrian people now, will only invite greater criminality against us all in the near future.