.
.
.
And so the American Mafia narco occupation of Afghanistan continues with daily tragedies into the 9th year of occupation. Military operations take place; civilians die, and the occupiers say these are mistakes......sorry have a few $ for the loss of your loved ones.
The Jew in America is confident of their power articulated eloquently through their document, "Project For A New American Century" 2000 which stated that hence forth with the decline of the Soviet Union American foreign policy would be dominated by military action against any and every nation on earth, denying rival powers to even come close as a super power.
In that overall mindset in Washington under Bush II since 2001, and continued under Obama with a smile and nicer words, Afghanistan thus becomes just another military base for the American empire out of the already 800 around the world. A vast base that will soon have 100,000 American troops and 180,000 private contractors, backed by NATO troops carrying out ops in Pakistan, Iran, and eventually Central Asia, Russia and China in the future in this long war.
America is not interested in Peace.
America is not interested in Democracy.
America is not interested in nation building and reconstruction in Afghanistan or Iraq; there hasn't been any despite spending $200 billion in Iraq, or $40 billion in Afghanistan.
America Jews want a global empire, conducting on going preferably low level insurgency wars against weak opponents............not full blown conventional wars against relative rival powers with real military punch.
In Germany and Japan after WWII the Americans instituted COMPETENT CIVILIAN GOVERNMENTS. Conrad Adenauer in Germany from 1949 under the CDU, and in Japan under the LDP, and the San Francisco Treaty of 1952. Both countries continued/continue to be colonies of America, with their troops stationed in Germany and Japan; American nuclear weapons stationed there over which the local government have no say or control..............and most significantly, the Americans fixing the political outcomes in BOTH countries for 60 years, in BOTH countries which do not adversely challenge American hegemony in their two new colonies. The military/security in these two American colonies are also for obvious reasons tightly controlled by the USA, either through NATO in Germany's case or through other bi-lateral means agreed upon soon after the end of WWII.
But we can say, that all things considered, even though Germans and the Japanese are not "free" in the pure sense, they are never the less happy and content.....Japan is a very rich successful country, the 2nd richest, where crime is very low, and overall social human satisfaction very high....and ditto Germany as officially the fourth largest economy on earth.
These were already successful countries prior to the American occupation in 1945.
But sadly this seems not to be the case in Afghanistan after nine years of American occupation. After spending $40 billion on development there seems to be very little to show for such extensive expenditure. $40 billion is a lot of money, so where has all the money gone?
Also America is not looking for "PEACE" in Afghanistan, whether its now or in the future......be it near future, medium future or the long term future. Instead America intends to use Afghanistan as a spring board for military operations against Pakistan, Iran, Central Asia, Russia and China. Within Afghanistan Americans keep talking about the rising threat of the Taliban, and more military operations against them in Marjah, Kandahar, and so forth.
With this American mindset, where 95% American expenditure in the country is for military security purposes, and where the Americans are seeking out more enemies in Afghanistan and outside Afghanistan in endless hopeless wars, AND finally where the Americans rely on well known local Afghan mafia to run the country..........then can Afghans, ......all Afghans.....Pashtuns, Tajik, Hazara, Persian, Uzbek can they achieve peace and development for their country in such a situation?
NO----NEVER, UNTIL AND UNLESS THE AMERICANS LEAVE AFGHANISTAN.
The American objectives have been, and are very different from their occupation of Germany and Japan, after WWII........and their occupation of Afghanistan now. In the case of Germany and Japan it was about consolidation of control through back channels.....puppet parties of America such as the CDU, LDP; extensive military bases; cultural domination......baseball in the case of Japan; the covert control of the security apparatus in these two countries.
In the case of Afghanistan, and to a lessor extent Iraq American occupation is overt, aggressive STILL INTO THE 9TH YEAR, indiscriminate, corrupt, and underlined by sheer American two faced duplicity......American politicians and military commanders say very rational reasonable things about how they should conduct themselves in these countries (presumably you are trying to win over the locals---a very logical objective in any military/post war scenario), but the actions on the ground by American forces starkly contradict these statements.
Why so?
Well a partial explanation has already been provided above, but this is not the full explanation. There are other obvious factors.
RELIGION: Christian fundamentalism is very strong in America; a unique phenomenon in a "modern" country. A good deal of the 36,000 professional officers in the USA military are influenced by Christian fundamentalism........where some even try to convert desperate Iraqis and Afghans, and other such actions which gives away their fundamentalist leanings. Then you have 9/11 conducted by Israel and thus naturally the animosity must have heightened to "get even" with the "Sand niggers", "Dune Coons" and "Towel Heads". We must thus assume that the very negative occupation by America of two Muslim countries, where in Iraq's case alone 1.3 million civilians have died, and 4-5 million turned into refugees.....and not a lot better in Afghanistan, that Christian fundamentalism within the American armed forces is blocking post war reconstruction and development in these two countries, after 9 years of occupation.
The only solution for Afghanistan and Iraq is for this Christian fundamentalist force of America to leave completely, and not even remain as back seat occupiers as in the case of Germany and Japan.
Racism in America has been very very strong historically to this day. This racism must affect the performance of the American armed forces. Racism affects your relationship and treatment of "others" naturally.....we may find various explanations to cover this act, but in the end it is about American racism. American racism is the reason why America dropped the nuclear bombs on Japan when the country was already in the process of considering surrender terms, and widely acknowledged as being close to near defeat, but not used against Germany----the so called killer of 6 million Jews.
American racism is the reason why America under Nixon bombed Cambodia, a neutral country in the Vietnam war, and which was already controlled by a military junta via an American backed coup. America's actions killed many Cambodian civilians, and was against International law. Many nations around the world have faced American institutional racism. Afghanistan is a brown country people----therefore naturally Afghans must be treated badly under American racism.
American materialism is also one of the main religions of the USA. In fact one could argue that it is the MAIN RELIGION. Per capita income in the USA is approaching $50,000 and Americans, average Americans aren't yet satisfied. How stupid inferior and worthless the average Afghans must seem to the Americans living in their mud huts, driving donkey carts as a dirt poor fourth world nation......How can rich Americans treat such a nation with respect? They must naturally have utter contempt and disdain for such a people.
Thus given this reality the only solution for ALL Afghans, if they desire peace and some reasonable development for the future in Afghanistan, is to drive out the American Christian fundamentalist, racist, materialistic armed oppressors from their country-------there is no other way. Afghans must live in dignity eventually. Tajiks who might see some advantage now under American occupation, must not believe falsely that they will forever enjoy their new position, once the Americans leave whenever in the future.
________________________________
Karzai's Defiant Stance Concerns U.S, Other Afghans
By Joshua Partlow
April 5, 2010 "Washington Post -- President Obama's visit to Kabul last week, intended in part to forge a closer working relationship with President Hamid Karzai, has helped produce the opposite: an angry Afghan leader now attacking the West for what he perceives as an effort to manipulate him and weaken his rule.
Karzai's relationship with his U.S. backers in the past week has taken a sharp turn for the worse after his two anti-Western speeches in three days, remarks that some officials see as a rehearsed, intentional move away from the United States.
In remarks to parliament members Saturday, Karzai said that if foreign interference in his government continues, the Taliban would become a legitimate resistance -- one that he might even join, according to lawmakers present.
"When I heard Karzai's remarks, it really shocked me. It scared me," a senior Afghan official who works closely with Karzai said. "We should not take this lightly. This is a golden opportunity to have the West here; we can't squander it."
Karzai's comments have angered U.S. officials and some of his prominent Afghan colleagues in the government, who fear he is jeopardizing international funding and military support because his pride has been injured.
"That guy's erratic, he's unpredictable. I don't get him," said a senior U.S. military official in Kabul.
Obama's visit was far from the only aggravation for Karzai in a partnership that has simmered with mistrust since the Afghan leader narrowly won reelection last year. But it helped propel him to his new antagonistic stance, according to Afghan and U.S. officials.
Karzai wanted Obama to publicly praise his plans for a "peace jirga," the planned meeting of tribal elders and political leaders to discuss reconciliation with insurgents, said the senior Afghan official, who requested anonymity in order to speak candidly. Karzai also wanted support for his views on how to reform the electoral law ahead of parliamentary elections in September.
What he got was Obama prodding him to perform. He pushed Karzai to keep two foreigners on an elections commission that investigates fraud; to appoint cabinet ministers based on merit rather than personal ties; and to fight corruption by giving more authority and independence to the corruption oversight agency, among other things. Karzai saw the visit less as a public show of partnership than the United States coming to scold an ineffectual leader, according to his supporters.
"Our most important ally is constantly criticizing us: 'You're corrupt. You need to do this and that,' " said Hekmat Karzai, director of the Center for Conflict and Peace Studies in Kabul, and a cousin of the president. "You cannot talk down to the Afghans like they're children or they don't understand."
This perceived slight of Obama's visit was compounded by the lower house of parliament's rejection of Karzai's decree that would reform the nation's elections law and give him more power over the commission that investigates voting fraud. The latter is a sore subject for him, since the panel ruled last year that widespread fraud of the presidential vote erased his first-round majority.
Karzai's first speech on Thursday harshly criticized foreigners and the United Nations for conspiring to weaken his government and accused foreign embassies of orchestrating the voting fraud. This caused a diplomatic uproar that was quelled only during Karzai's phone call to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton the next day, in which he expressed his commitment to their partnership.
But the next day, Karzai told a gathering of lawmakers that foreign interference fuels the insurgency. One lawmaker said Karzai made the point that if he is compelled to obey foreigners, "I'll join the Taliban."
"I know he's cooperating with the U.S., but he just wants to give us a wrong perception. He's trying to prove himself as a hero, a nationalist," the lawmaker said.
Some of the presidents' supporters said that people overreacted to the statements, and that Karzai is well aware of how reliant he is on the United States and other countries fighting in Afghanistan. The United States pours billions of dollars monthly into Afghanistan, and 30,000 new troops are arriving to fight the Taliban.
Speaking at a meeting of about 1,200 tribal leaders and local officials in the southern city of Kandahar on Sunday, Karzai again suggested that U.S. pressure is counterproductive.
"Afghanistan will be fixed when its people trust that their president is independent and not a puppet," he said. "We have to demonstrate our sovereignty. We have to demonstrate that we are standing up for our values."
Despite his displeasure with the U.S. government, Karzai made the trip to Kandahar to build public support for a top U.S. and NATO goal of combating the insurgency with a major military push this summer into the districts around Kandahar.
He asked attendees whether they are happy about the upcoming operation. A loud murmur echoed across the vast meeting room.
"Listen to me carefully: Until you're happy and satisfied, we will not conduct this operation," he said to loud applause.
Staff writer Rajiv Chandrasekaran in Kandahar contributed to this report.
