The Jews of Iran

.
.
.
.
Officially 20,000 But unofficially as many as 100,000 as many do not declare their faith.

This is the largest Jewish population in the Middle East, after Israel.

There were officially 200,000 Jews in Iran before the Islamic Revolution of 1979. After the CIA instigated Islamic coup many of the Iranian Jews went to Israel and America. 

Terrorism and destabilization is the pattern by which the Shepherdic Jews have been herded into Israel from the Greater Middle East.

In most cases its a been a total success, except with Iran.

Cyrus the Great freed the Jews from Babylonian captivity, but many chose not to return to Israel in 539 BC.......BUT became essential minority cogs in the wheels of the Persian empire.

There are even Jewish desert campfire stories that a Jewish Yenta married a Persian King........Esther (Ishtar) the Jewish daughter of a Persian court official, and how she saved the Jews from mass genocide and helped them escape to Israel. (Absolutely no historical evidence of this fable ever existed from the Iranian side)

BUT NEVER LET FACTS GET IN THE WAY OF A GOOD JEWISH STORY      

(Purim--Jewish VICTIMHOOD HOLIDAYS to keep the tribal cult together ).........RIGHT Mr. Amano? Mr. Amano are you there? Are you getting a lot of pressure to fulfil the Jewish narrative from Washington and Israel?.......that the CIA Mullah's of Iran are developing nuke bombs against Israel.
. . . .
After the Rothschild organised WWI was over, and JEWISH REVOLUTION FOR SOCIAL CHANGE took place..

Jews ran the former Russian empire, the German empire, the former Ottoman empire through Mustapha Kemal.

In the vast Arabian desert area, the Saudi clan in the 1930's with direct British aid.....thought to be Jews from Basra, originally.

In Iran it was through Colonel Reza Khan, the former Shah of Iran's father, who is alleged to be a Jew........came to power with British help.




and so Jews in Iran also participated in the CIA Islamic Revolution of 1979.

Like the mythical Esthers father, there are Jews serving in the Islamic Republic.

Saeed Emami former deputy director of the Intelligence services appointed at the age of 32, whose greatest activity was not protecting Iran, but busy KILLING IRANIAN intellectuals inside Iran. Left Iran as a Jew in the 1970's to study in the USA mechanical engineering, and came back into Iran with a new MOSSAD identity as a Muslim loving the CIA Islamic revolution. 

 
 He was accused of having independently organized the assassinations of 'dissidents' intellectual (known as the "chain murders"). aka Jewish name Danyal Ghavami. 

Who is better placed than Danyal Ghavami to inform ISRAEL whether Iran truly has a nuclear bomb program or NOT? 1979--1999. 







Mahmoud Ahmedinejad former President of Iran.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad revealed to have Jewish past

A photograph of the Iranian president holding up his identity card during elections in March 2008 clearly shows his family has Jewish roots.

A close-up of the document reveals he was previously known as Sabourjian – a Jewish name meaning cloth weaver. The short note scrawled on the card suggests his family changed its name to Ahmadinejad when they converted to embrace Islam after his birth.

The Sabourjians traditionally hail from Aradan, Mr Ahmadinejad's birthplace, and the name derives from "weaver of the Sabour", the name for the Jewish Tallit shawl in Persia. The name is even on the list of reserved names for Iranian Jews compiled by Iran's Ministry of the Interior.

Daily Telegraph

and finally ...........General Qassem Solimanei (Soloman)
. . .
Head of the elite Quds Brigade (Jerusalem Brigade) an elite part of the Pasdaran and a cross breed Iranian equivalent of the CIA and Navy Seals. His forces were invited into Iraq by the Americans after Saddam was removed, where 1000 are stationed with FULL-American consent, and 2000 in Syria fighting the CIA's ISIS quite effectively......with 4 Pasdaran generals dying there, leading the REAL fight against CIA's ISIS .      (USA and ISRAEL not so happy about this fact.....they want an ISIS government in Damascus)

How dare the Iranians fight CIA Islamic terrorists in Syria/ISIS?

How dare the Iranians sacrifice the lives of four Pasdaran generals and 1000 personnel in the process of fighting the CIA ISIS in Syria?

How dare the Iranians sacrifice the lives of four Pasdaran generals and 1000 personnel in the process of protecting a SECULAR, popular, democratically chosen SOCIALIST government which itself is trying hard to run a multi-ethnic nation including Christians and Druze from the CIA ISIS hordes.




_________________________________

Tucker Carlson

.
.
.
.

Aaron Maté's Questions for Mueller

.
.
.
.

Illegal cargo and smuggling in the Persian Gulf

.
.
.
.
Normally the Iranians would have looked the other way, but since the British Empire decided to mis-INTERPRET international law against Iran......then why not Iran enforce authentic International law in its own territorial waters, against a British vessel?

_______________________________________________________

MT Riah tanker detained by Iran was smuggling oil: So says Panama maritime authority

By Presstv.com

Panama's maritime authority has confirmed that a tanker operating under the country's flag and seized by Iran in the Persian Gulf last week for smuggling fuel, was indeed in violation of international laws.

The Panamanian Maritime Administration (AMP) on Sunday censured the use of ships chartered by Panama for illegal acts, days after Iran's Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) detained the oil tanker MT Riah when it was smuggling one million liters of Iranian fuel in the northern part of the Strait of Hormuz.

“We categorically condemn the use of vessels with a Panamanian flag for illicit acts that threaten the safety of human life,” the AMP underscored in a statement.

The statement further said that “those who clearly violate the laws, conventions and international agreements will be sanctioned and will run the risk that the ship is canceled from the Registry.”

Panamanian Ship Registry on Friday officially started withdrawing the registration of MT Riah after an investigation determined the tanker had "deliberately violated international regulations," the AMP said.

According to specialized international sites, the vessel changed its name four times between 2009 and 2019. The vessel's Dubai-based owner Prime Tankers LLC says it has sold the vessel to Mouj Al-Bahar, another Emirati company.

PressTV-Iran’s IRGC seizes foreign vessel smuggling fuel

Iran's Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) has seized a foreign vessel smuggling fuel in the Persian Gulf.

The latest development follows the British seizure of an Iranian oil tanker claiming that it was carrying crude to Syria in violation of the European Union’s unilateral sanctions against the Arab country.

The Grace 1 supertanker, carrying 2.1 million barrels of oil, was seized on July 4 as it transited through international waters off Gibraltar, which is located on Spain's southern tip.

Later that day, Iran’s Foreign Ministry summoned Britain’s ambassador in Tehran, Rob Macaire, to express its strong protest at the move. The envoy was told that the British Royal Marines’ move was tantamount to “maritime piracy.”

Reports say the seizure took place at the request of the United States, which has been bent on driving Iranian oil exports to “zero” as part of its sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei denounced Britain’s illegal seizure of the oil tanker, warning that the act of “piracy” will not go unanswered.

Read More:

• Iran will not leave UK piracy unanswered: Leader

On July 19, the IRGC Navy captured British oil tanker Stena Impero for violating international maritime laws when crossing the high-traffic Strait of Hormuz.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said Monday that Iran's arguments for its seizure of the UK-flagged oil tanker were more convincing than those of London.

"Iran’s arguments are much more right than those of Gibraltar and London who are indulging in piracy," Ryabkov said.

Iranian officials says the vessel had switched off its GPS locator, in contravention of international regulations, and was sailing into the strategic waterway in a wrong traffic pattern.

The taker was transferred to the port of Iran’s southern city of Bandar Abbas for maritime casualty investigation.

The Britain has sought a diplomatic solution to the incident and UK Prime Minister Theresa May is to hold a meeting of the emergencies committee on Monday to discuss the issue.

Saudi Arabia, which had itself been holding an Iranian oil tanker for almost 11 weeks, called Iran’s measure to seize Stena Impero "completely unacceptable".

PressTV-Iran confirms Saudi release of detained oil tanker

Tehran confirms earlier reports that an Iranian oil tanker that was detained by Saudi Arabia more than two months ago has been released,

Saudi Arabia announced in early May that its coast guard had rescued a distressed Iranian oil tanker with 26 on board off the Red Sea port of Jeddah, after it faced “engine failure and the loss of control.”

According to Iranian officials, the incident had occurred on April 30 while Happiness I was on its way to the Suez Canal, and that water had leaked into the tanker’s engine room.

The Saudis were refusing to let the vessel leave and were, at the same time, demanding that Iran pay $200,000 a day for maintaining the vessel in the port city of Jeddah, some $10 million in total.

The oil tanker, however, was released on Saturday after a series of negotiations.

Nobody else......nobody else save the British Empire decides to bait Iran in its own territorial waters......hoping the Iranians go trigger happy and shoot up a oil tanker in the Persian Gulf.

.
.
.
.

Iran's Seizing the Stena Impero Was NOT Retaliation

By Scott Creighton at American everyman or as now nomandiceveryman

The Stena Impero was traveling through Iranian side of the Strait when it struck an Iranian fishing vessel. The fishing vessel requested assistance from the Impero which ignored them, turned off their tracking system and tried to exit the scene. So yes, the Iranians detained the tanker for violating any number of maritime laws not the least of which being they left another vessel crippled and in danger of sinking in the water. Ergo... no... this is not a 'tit for tat" retaliation for the illegal seizure of that Iranian tanker last week by the British.

More False Flag claims by the USA

.
.
.
.

You can buy a first class STEALTH fifth generation fighter for a fraction of the cost to the F-35, and local licensed production rights if you order enough of them +100.

.
.
.
.


Why waste money buying the SU-35 AND SU-37, when Turkey can buy and license manufacture the SU-57?

__________________________________________________

Russia Prepared to Sell Turkey Advanced Fighter Jets

F-35 not the only option for Turkey

Jason Ditz Posted onat antiwar.com

The Pentagon has made a big deal about punishing Turkey by expelling them from the F-35 program, and costing them the opportunity to buy very, very expensive US-made warplanes.

Officials from Russia’s Rostec say they’d be keen to remind Turkey that they also make some really advanced fighter jets of their own, and that Turkey is free to buy Su-35 jets if they can’t buy the F-35. 

The Su-35 isn’t a stealth fighter, like the F-35, but it also costs less than half as much and is still a very advanced multi-role jet in its own right.  It isn’t really competing with the F-35 either since the US is refusing to sell those to them anymore.

The Su-35 has been used as an escort by Russia in Syria, and has become an increasingly popular export for Russia. Egypt announced back in March that they intend to buy over two dozen such planes, a move that similarly led the US to threaten sanctions. (Pakistan maybe will buy some also, as will IRAN)

NATO Turkey

.
.
.
.
.
Neutral Turkey joined NATO enthusiastically.

It joined a military alliance which was against the Communist bloc of the Soviet Union and China.

It sent 5000 of its elite crack troops to fight in the Korean war of 1950-53. To show its true commitment.

It at one time hosted 36,000 American servicemen as part of NATO.

It at one time hosted American Nuclear missiles pointed against the Soviet Union. For this very reason the Soviets decided to position SOVIET NUCLEAR missiles in Cuba. To de-escalate the Cuban missile crisis, President John F Kennedy agreed with Khrushchev to withdraw all American missiles from Turkey in exchange for the Soviets agreeing not to station nuclear missiles on Cuba. 

Israel referred to Turkey as its best MILITIA in the Middle East (Deonme Jews since the time of the Young Turks 1908 have played a critical role in the Turkish state and its security) 


BUT the winds of history changes....

The Soviet UNION DISAPPEARED.

The Warsaw Pact disappeared as did Comecon.

Turkey reinvented itself for NATO.

The vital Bridge to Eurasia and the Middle East

Pan-Turanism was promoted by the state

BUT most critically after 1991 was the promotion of Islamic fundamentalism by the Turkish state through its state agencies and the Deep State, and MIT.....WITH THE COOPERATION and approval of the USA State Department and CIA. Islamic terrorism in the Caucasus, Russia, China, Central Asia, Libya, Egypt, Syria and other such places in the Greater Middle East for their Israeli and American masters.

NATURALLY in such an environment in the 1990's a new more 'purist' Islamic party would emerge under Erdogan ( just another Islamist CIA agent?)

There were 2 main problems in the new environment for NATO Turkey:

1. The Greater Kurdistan project Sponsored by the USA very very very officially to the point where the USA threatened anybody attempting to attack the illegal entity, in alliance with Israel.



2. The Greater Israel project--or Eretz Israel, which appears to being made a reality via American military grunting and sacrifice solely, with a little bit of NATO help.



One does not have to be a professor of strategic studies at Bilkent university to rationalize the very REAL and Imminent threat such projects sponsored by the USA and Israel have against NATO Turkey.
_______________________________________________

Turkey Announces The Targets Of Its New Air Defense System

MOON OF ALABAMA

Today first parts of the Russian S-400 air defense systems arrived in Turkey. The Russian Ministry of Defense posted a video of the arrival on Facebook. The Turkish Ministry of Defense video showed the unloading of six support vehicles belong to a S-400 set. A complete S-400 set consists of two radars, a command post, eight launch vehicles with four missiles each, and various loader and other support vehicles. Turkey has ordered two complete sets for which it will pay about $2.5 billion.

The U.S. is threatening economic sanctions against Turkey for ordering and receiving the system. It will also kick Turkey out of the F-35 fighter jet program. Turkey was one of the main partners for the F-35 program. It was supposed to receive 100 of the planes and it manufactures parts of the system. Turkey will not receive the ordered planes and those parts will now be made by a U.S. company.

The S-400 system Turkey receives is an export version. It will at first use the 48N6E missiles which have a reach of 250 kilometer. The systems Russia uses include the 40N6E missiles with a reach of 400 kilometers. It will take several months until the first system set in Turkey is complete and operational. So far only 20 Turkish soldiers have been trained on it. 80 more soldiers will arrive in Russia around the end of July to receive their training.

NATO is not amused about the Turkish acquisition:

A NATO official told CNN on Friday that: "It is up to allies to decide what military equipment they buy. However, we are concerned about the potential consequences of Turkey's decision to acquire the S-400 system."The official added that, "interoperability of our armed forces is fundamental to NATO for the conduct of our operations and missions."

The S-400 in Turkey is not supposed to be interoperable with NATO. The most likely initial deployment area for the new system will be around Ankara to protect the wannabe-Sultan Erdogan from potential U.S. or Israeli attacks.

The government controlled Turkish news agency Anadolu made it abundantly clear what the system is supposed to target. 

When it announced the news of the arrival it attached the picture below to its tweet:

ANADOLU AGENCY (ENG) @anadoluagency - 12:05 UTC - 12 Jul 2019#Turkey: Russian #S400 hardware deployment starts http://v.aa.com.tr/1529747

bigger The upper part of the graphic explains the S-400 system. The lower part says: "The system can eliminate" and then shows the silhouettes and names of U.S. military bomber, fighter and radar planes as well as Tomahawk cruise missiles. The only one missing is the 'invisible' F-35 which the S-400 can of course also detect and eliminate.

The second S-400 set will likely be stationed on Turkey's southern coast from where it can cover Cyprus and protect Turkish oil interests in the eastern Mediterranean sea. Turkey recently started drilling around Cyprus. North Cyprus is occupied by Turkey since 1974. But its claims for exploration rights extend even to the south of the island and recently started drilling there.

bigger

The European Union, which does not recognize Turkey's occupation of north Cyprus, signaled that it will sanction Turkey over it.

Turkey's relation with the U.S., NATO and the EU are likely to get worse. Russia's slow but steady strategy to draw Turkey to its side is progressing very well. With the F-35 purchase canceled Turkey will have to look to Russia for acquiring modern fighter planes. An order will depend on the manufacturing share Russia is willing to hand over to Turkey.

The Turkish economy is not well. Its aggression in Syria and Libya proved to be costly. President Erdogan recently fired the chief of the Turkish central bank who was not willing to lower the interest rate. Erdogan believes that high interest rates cause high inflation while 99% of all economists believe that higher interest rates are the best way to fight inflation.

Many Turkish companies and private households took out loans that are denominated in Euro or U.S. Dollar. If the central bank lowers the interest rate the Turkish Lira will sink and repaying the loans will become more expensive. New U.S. and EU sanctions will make these problems worse.

Erdogan may soon have an air defense system that can protect Turkey's capital. But the move will cost the country, and Erdogan, in many other fields. Russia is the country that wins from Turkey's problems. One hopes that it will use the leverage it gains over Turkey to remove the Turkish invasions from Syria.

Coming thick and fast (DESPERATION) False Flag number 5

.
.
.
.
The British Ministry of defense along with the Foreign Office were involved in the latest False Flag----which appears to have been carefully planned. British Imperialism at its best.

Massive EMPTY SUPER TANKER leaving Iraqi port of Basra (Iraq is a key ally of Iran carefully cultivated since 2003 when the country was unintentionally gifted to Iran by the USA...When Iraq's  65% Shia majority were allowed to rule the country for the first time in 1200 years) Iran which carefully monitors ALL Persian Gulf traffic (Habit developed by the USA in the 1970's when the Shah of Iran was designated the 'Policeman of the Persian Gulf'...and supplied with the latest technology from America) knows the origin of all ships coming and going through the Persian GULF.......and most of it annually is routine traffic by the same ships.

Whilst Iran may verbally threaten from time to time to close the Straights of Hormuz, or take further action in tat for tat pronouncements by certain individuals in Iran......it is extremely unlikely to target tankers/ships that do business with friendly neighbor Iraq. The Iranians do track ALL the ships.

Also as the writer below points out ........empty tankers come into the Persian Gulf, and leave with the cargo of oil. NOT IN THIS SUSPICIOUS CASE.

As the writer points out below again, the British tanker switched off its transponder for 24 hours during its time in the straights of Hormuz.......a ship or plane would only do that if it wanted to disappear from international tracking, and invite hostile investigation....or even an attack.

As reported before SAS members and Royal Marines are already on board certain ships in the Persian Gulf ready to repulse Pasdaran speed boat attacks. You don't want oil on the tanker if a fire fight breaks outs, even with a British naval ship shadowing the tanker. 

The empty British super tanker filled with Somali pirates, people who otherwise would normally be busy transporting Helmand heroin into the streets of Perfidious Albion, appears to be hugging the UAE coast, far as possible from Iran....and therefore EXTREMELY UNLIKELY that the Pasdaran provocatively would come out into CLEAR INTERNATIONAL WATERS....or even UAE waters to attack a British tanker.

30 million Somali 'refugees' have been allowed to enter the wonderful UK by Tony Blair's New labour Rothschilds puppet show, to help accelerate the cooperation of Somali pirates and the wonderful British state.

So the British tanker was BAIT........and the Iranians did not fall for it. 





_________________________________________________

Iran Keeps Calm While U.S. And Britain Continue Their Provocations

Moon of Alabama

Great Britain has joined the U.S. pressure and provocation campaign against Iran. It is creating incidents to put Iran into a defensive position and to provoke it into a violent reaction.

Early today 'two U.S. officials' spread a scare story about Iran which lead to this CNN headline: Iranian boats attempted to seize a British tanker in the Strait of Hormuz

Armed Iranian boats unsuccessfully tried to seize a British oil tanker in the Persian Gulf Wednesday, according to two US officials with direct knowledge of the incident.The British Heritage tanker was sailing out of the Persian Gulf and was crossing into the Strait of Hormuz area when it was approached by boats from the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The Iranians ordered the tanker to change course and stop in nearby Iranian territorial waters, according to the officials.

The same 'two U.S. officials' briefed ABCNews:

A British warship prevented an apparent attempt by five Iranian small boats to direct a British oil tanker towards Iranian waters on Wednesday, according to two U.S. officials.

Remarkably the official British report came later than the U.S. officials briefing. It showed significant differences:

The UK defence ministry said that "three Iranian vessels attempted to impede the passage of a commercial vessel, British Heritage, through the Strait of Hormuz.""HMS Montrose was forced to position herself between the Iranian vessels and British Heritage and issue verbal warnings to the Iranian vessels, which then turned away," the ministry statement said.
...
"There has been no confrontation in the last 24 hours with any foreign vessels, including British ones," the Revolutionary Guards said in a statement.

The U.S. officials claimed 5, not 3 boats. They claimed the boats tried to seize the ship, while the Brits just say they probably were getting in the way of the ship. The U.S. officials 'direct knowledge of the incident' seems to be lacking. Iran says that nothing happened at all.

There are reasons to believe that the Iranian statement is the most truthful one.

The BRITISH HERITAGE is a crude oil carrier with an overall length of 274 m, a beam of 49 m and a maximum draft of 17.8 m. How three of the typical 20 feet long fiberglass speedboats of the IRGC could try to 'seize' or even 'impede' such a huge ships is inconceivable.

According to CNN the ship came from Basra, Iraq, had stopped at the Saudi coast and then left the Persian Gulf. It was not carrying any cargo at the time of the incident. That is quite curious as a crude oil carrier is typically loaded with oil when it leaves the Persian Gulf countries, and does not therefore enter the Gulf laden with oil.

Here is a Marine Traffic chart of the last course of the British Heritage.

bigger

Of interest is also that the ship turned off its AIS signal, see the dotted line, during its passage through the Hormuz Strait.

CNN also noted that:

On July 10, the ship turned off its transponders for almost 24 hours, making it undetectable by radars. When it switched on its transponders at around 1pm Eastern Time, it appeared to have sailed through the Persian Gulf escorted by the HMS Montrose.

Turning of the AIS in a high traffic area and especially at night is quite dangerous. 

The AIS signals a ships type, speed and course and other ships use that data to plan their own course. But even without AIS the ship will still be visible on the Iranian surveillance radars that control the Hormuz Strait. A ship on the radar screen without AIS information would be suspicious.

So why would the British ship do that? Was that an attempt to draw special attention to it from the Iranian coast guard or military?

To me it seems that the empty British crude carrier, which was shadowed by a British frigate, was used as bait. There were probably Royal Marines on board waiting for an Iranian attempt to seize the ship. Iran did not fall for it.

On July 4 the British military in Gibraltar hijacked the tanker GRACE 1 which was carrying Iranian crude oil allegedly to Syria. The ship had planned to receive provisions in Gibraltar. The British controlled enclave changed its local regulations only a day before the ship arrived:

The new regulation, introduced on July 3, allows Gibraltar to designate and detain ‘specified ships’ for up to 72 hours if the chief minister has reasonable grounds to suspect a breach of EU regulations.Crucially, Grace 1 can be held until any other legal proceedings in other jurisdictions against the owners of the cargo or tanker are settled. The seizure has triggered a diplomatic row between the UK and Iran, amid claims the detention was done at the behest of the US.

Tomasz Wlostowski, a lawyer specialized in EU regulatory affairs, found that there is no legal base in EU sanctions law and regulations to nab the tanker.

Today the police of Gibraltar arrested the captain of the ship:

Gibraltar Chronicle @GibChronicle - 14:45 UTC - 11 Jul 2019Police in #Gibraltar have arrested the captain and chief officer of the supertanker Grace 1 on suspicion of breaching EU sanctions on Syria, a spokesman for the Royal Gibraltar Police has confirmed.
The spokesman confirmed too that documents and electronic devices have been seized from the ship.

Both men were arrested on Thursday afternoon interviewed under caution. Neither has been charged at this stage and investigations continue.

On July 3 a U.S. military spy plane crossed into Iranian airspace, twice, likely to provoke an reaction. 

The pirating of the GRACE 1 on July 4 was a U.S. planned provocation of Iran but carried out by the Brits. 

The passage of the empty BRITISH HERITAGE without AIS but with a military shadow seems to have been an attempt to lure Iran into a revenge action. When that did not work John Bolton strew the scare story about a failed attempt to 'seize' the ship. The Brits say the incident was less serious, and Iran says it never happened. The arrest of the captain of the GRACE 1 is another step on the provocation ladder.

The people who planned these provocation do not understand how Iran acts and reacts. Its military forces are obviously under orders not to react to provocations as such could allow the John Bolton's of this world to escalate towards a war.

Iran will react to these provocations and especially the British seizure of its tanker. But, as we noted in an earlier piece, its responses to such incidents are nearly always asymmetrical and come at an unexpected place and time.

Straight shooter with integrity, The honorable Robert Mueller esquire

.
.
.
.
Massive PROPAGANDA from the 1930's HAS BRAINWASHED Americans into thinking that FBI figures are clean public figures who work for the public good. This couldn't be further from the truth, but when you have Hollywood movie idols like Tommy Lee JONES, Leonardo DiCaprio and Clint Eastwood fronting FBI hero's then the brainwashing is complete.


This is further reinforced by FBI false flags (hero's to the rescue), and the MOCKINGBIRD FAKE GLOBALIST MEDIA who  further deify the FBI.



Imagine that here you have a man who working under GLOBALIST Hilary was the bagman taking Uranium samples to show to Russian government operatives at secret locations, prior to their illegal sale to Russia.....and no doubt profiting from such clandestine work, whilst still the head of the FBI?




From WND.COM  the-8-dirtiest-scandals-of-robert-mueller-no-one-is-talking-about

It was attorney Jeffrey Marty, who at American Lookout.com, compiled a long list of scandals casting shadows over Mueller. The following are a few of the better-known:

• Some $12 billion in $100 bills was dispatched to the Iraq war theater, and vanished.
• The IRS deliberately targeted Christian and conservative organizations to cause them trouble.
• Fast and Furious saw the government traffic guns into the hands of Mexican cartel criminals.
• The Department of Justice spied on AP reporters.
• Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation got millions for speeches while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state.
• Hillary Clinton dealt to Russia control of 20 percent of the uranium capacity inside the U.S.
• Of course, there was Hillary Clinton’s private email server, and all the government records, including classified, that ended up there.
• The HSBC money-laundering scandal.

Marty pointed out that, despite his history, Mueller was sold, when handed the job, as “ramrod straight” and “utterly incorruptible.”

“It’s always suspicious when anyone’s credibility is oversold like this, but that goes double when the same person was FBI director for 12 years – spanning across both the Bush and Obama administrations from 2001 to 2013 – yet most people can’t remember anything about him,” Marty writes. “We should remember actions he took to impartially uphold the law. Sadly, that is not the case.

Strong indication of progress in a FINAL Peace deal in Afghanistan

.
.
.
.

Officials Upbeat After Most Productive US-Taliban Talks So Far

Taliban interested in talking power-sharing deal with Afghan govt

Jason Ditz Posted onat antiwar.com

Those familiar with this weekend’s peace talks between the US and the Taliban in Doha are praising the situation, calling the end of the war “more likely than ever,” after the most productive talks yet.

These sides have made productive talks several times this year, and these are said to be the most substantive yet, with a deal approaching agreement on two key points, the withdrawal of foreign troops and the Taliban’s commitment to keep ISIS and al-Qaeda out of Afghanistan.

(Afghan's are war weary after 40 years of fighting inside the country---the card board cutout NOBLE SAVAGE is ultimately human after all including the Taliban, and there is a basic national consensus among Afghans that the country does not need any more foreign fighters in the country. How do we know this?

In the height of 2001, there may have been 5000 foreign fighters in the country from Central Asia and Arab countries mainly.....most of them have moved back to their native countries and one rarely hears about them anymore....'American special forces kill Uzbek warlord' so on...

However the Pentagon according to credible sources have moved several thousand ISIS fighters into Afghanistan for further ops against Central Asia. These ISIS fighters are a challenge to the Taliban and its legitimacy and power in the resistance movement in Afghanistan, THUS the Taliban will fight them where ever they exist post USA withdrawal.....they are foreign, and they seem to replace the Taliban and their legitimacy in Afghanistan.....that is a fact, with several clashes already recorded.

Is it really possible for American air-power, and communications networks and satellite imagery helping the TALIBAN IDENTIFY, attack and destroy Pentagon ISIS imports..??????Is this level of cooperation possible??? That would be a really great confidence building platform.....not just talking and signing declarations.

CO-OPERATION can be tested immediately between the Taliban and the USA in the above scenario. An affirmation of good faith through cooperation)

Those two aspects of the deal have been a foregone conclusion for awhile. The Taliban is also inspiring confidence as they talk about power-sharing with the existing US-backed Afghan government, saying they don’t insist on a monopoly on power, but they want to have some of the power. 

The Afghan government has long been reluctant to talk power-sharing with the Taliban, fearing that without US military support they’re going to have to give up substantial control over the country, in that they can’t enforce their own rule without US and NATO forces having their back.

Decades of failing to build a functioning Afghan government have a lot of NATO nations ambivalent about exactly where the power-sharing deal ends up. The Taliban’s pledge to support anti-terror operations is seen as particularly vital, since 19 years in, Afghan government forces show no ability to defeat any of those groups. 

CIA fighting CIA in Libya

.
.
.
.
. . . .


General Khalifa Hafter is a CIA trained asset who is attempting to unite Libya (As yet another Arab strong man). 

He lived extensively in the USA prior to the "Arab Spring" destabilization by the CIA in 2011 of Colonel Gaddafi, who himself was a former CIA asset from the 1960's. With the downfall of  Colonel Gaddafi General Hafter appeared in the scene attempting to seize ultimate power and unite the failed state.

To this end General Hafter has had to increase his legitimacy in the eyes of his people, and do the right thing by his country and people in order to come to power. It is not only a simple matter of fighting and taking power in this complex divided society and consolidate the country for his CIA masters.

But as with ALL CIA assets there has been a falling out ....between the master and servant...because of the clash of the inevitable interests between what the CIA wants from Libya through him, and what he sees his country needs for it to be effectively consolidated under his leadership.

This was the case with CIA Nasser who was recruited in the 1940's (His Arab Socialist leadership was too focused on Israel, the very country with whom the CIA was forging through Mossad very close working relationship in the 1950's under the direction of James JESUS Angleton)

CIA Saddam HUSSEIN recruited in the 1950's (invasion of Kuwait 1990, and firing 57 Scud missiles at Israel in 1991)

CIA Gaddafi recruited in the 1960's (Was on the good side of the CIA for a long time 1969--2011, but sadly he started talking about African nationalism, an African Central Reserve Bank set up with Libyan petrol money, and finally plans to repatriate his $200 billion of his country's petrol money from Western banks into an African Central Bank bank set up by Libya......and ofcourse there was 143 tons of gold to loot sitting pretty in Tripoli, and the best super light high quality oil in the world again ready to be looted....Western pangs of PREDATORY CAPITALISM and colonialism...were tooooo irresistible for a little thing like worn out CIA ASSET to get in the way of geo-politics)

CIA Mullahs recruited in the 1950's during the conservative/REACTIONARY ANTI-communist over throw of the Mosaddeg government ...and THEN in turn used to over throw the CIA ASSET the Shah of Iran in 1979. (Tooo many speeches about Israel by the mullahs most of them mistranslated by the GLOBALIST MEDIA, and more significantly IN THE PROCESS OF PROTECTING SHIA MINORITIES in other countries {WHAT ELSE WOULD the only big Shia theocratic power in the Middle East  STATEs DO?} ........UNINTENTIONALLY blocking the Israeli plans for ERETZ Israel...'greater Israel' in Lebanon via Shia Hezbollah, Syria via the Alawite Shia government of Assad, and Iraq by supporting the 65% majority Shia of the country in tandem with the USA who deliberately brought the Shia into power.........in the first place)

CIA Taliban in Afghanistan established in 1994 to help the CIA consolidate the country (Upon coming to power the stupid Taliban not reading their cue cards...attempted successfully to eradicate all Opium production in the country, as it was deemed unIslamic along with ALL music, and female education. Not a difficult thing to do given that almost ALL opium production were in the Pashtun areas and was a legacy of the British empire.......BUT sadly one has to say that one of the biggest 'business' in the USA PAPER ECONOMY is illegal narcotics importation by the likes of the CIA and other such state entities like the DEA WORTH about $1,000,000,000,000 or 1 trillion. It is a business that the CIA cultivates very very seriously, to the point where Capital HILL pretends it does not exist........yep $1 trillion narcotics business is hard to miss.

The CIA Taliban refused to provide guarantees for a gas pipeline running from Turkmenistan via Afghanistan to the markets in SOUTH Asia, to be built by an American company, Unicol. Despite numerous expensive paid for corporate visits by the Taliban to Unicols HQ in Texas.....these savages simply don't understand multi-national business! )

One wonders if the last remaining negotiating point in Qatar between the Taliban and the USA is what percentage of the Opium will be allowed to be grown in Afghanistan after the USA MILITARY leaves? It is a known fact that the Taliban themselves have profited from the business post-invasion/occupation to pay for their war machine.




Now what has poor General Hafter done to incur the wrath of the CIA? The CIA website does not tell us why, and therefore we must look at the proverbial crystal ball and guess:

• General Hafter approached for friendship, cooperation and security help from Russia. Russia has a solid record of fighting Islamist Wahhabi terrorism, because Russia has been a victim of them and that Russia also doesn't covertly sponsor them, like ISIS and 'al-CIA-duh'.
• General Hafter maybe doesn't like CIA backed ISIS AND 'al-CIA-duh' fractions in his country and sees them as challenge to the unification of his country....and is expending real energy and resources fighting them?
• General Hafter maybe does not like his country to be a base for CIA terrorism in Syria and the general middle East...funneling arms and men from where ever the CIA recruits.
• General Hafter just maybe is infused with genuine Libyan nationalism and does not wish his country to be another failed African state, which is a base of illegal African refugees massing in the country to go to Europe. Or improbably the abhorrent site of African desperate hapless refugees slaves caged in inhuman conditions waiting to be sold to the highest bidder. Bush II and Obummers legacy of creating 78 million refugees around the world, which then become business and political products of the globalists.
• General Hafter wants to unite his country, the CIA on the other hand wants it left DIVIDED, FAILED AND THOROUGHLY LOOTED BY PREDATORY CAPITALISM.