Despite the faggotty concocted weird experiences I have always believed most Americans are simply decent.

.
.
.
.
I suppose I live in a highly concocted faggotty world where a simple visit to a shop or the restaurant or a basic conversation becomes a great matter for the spooky faggot gofers of the International Jew.

But from time to time one is reminded of the base humanity of most real people and of course Americans.

In a sense in the parallel world of Jew empire building through American military might what ordinary God fearing Americans think is irrelevant.

In the Jew world what is important is leverage, deals, threats, money, tricks, false flag ops, and raw power........their new confident heroes are Vin Diesel, and Bruce Willis.....tough macho men who are action hero's and a touch on the shady side of the law.......with very short hair, and even shorter reasoning.

I am assuming most of humanity, despite the best PR efforts of Hollywood conditioning do not accept such men as the standard model, or their belief systems, or where "we" are all going.

In the USA naturally most Americans don't want endless wars against concocted pre-gamed enemies such as "al-CIA-duh" and "rogue states" created by the CIA.

But in reality the views of ordinary Americans do not matter in such areas to the International Jew and their world view, or to Likud Israel.

What matters is what American governments state in support of Israeli geo-strategic objectives (Install "al-Qada" into power in a ME country, and then later wage war against the very same country to save Israel and the world from another concocted peril).

What matters is the covert help the USA gives Israel to enable it to reach its geo-strategic objectives. These things "energize" the "little shitty state" in the Levant more than anything else.

The American public lumbered with consumer related debt, brow beaten by police state powers and surveillance, the gay "Hurray Henry" militarization of American society, poverty, financial crisis, mass illegal immigration which threatens their jobs, soaring crimes rates, endless wars, mortgage debt, and a soaring underclass of traditional white Americans seem not to matter to the sharp witted, sharp practicing Jew who lack fundamental human compassion.

_________________________

Little US Popular Support for Israeli Attack on Iran

by Jim Lobe at antiwar.com

Amid persistent speculation over a possible Israeli military attack against Iranian nuclear facilities in the wake of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Washington, a detailed new public opinion survey released Tuesday suggests that such a move would enjoy little support in the United States.

According to the survey by the University of Maryland’s Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA), only one in four U.S. respondents favors an Israeli strike, while nearly seven in 10 (69%), including a strong majority of Republicans (59%), said they prefer continuing negotiations with Tehran.

Only one in seven (14%) of the survey’s 727 respondents said they thought Washington should encourage an Israeli attack, while 80% said the U.S. should either discourage Israel from taking such a step (34%) or maintain a neutral position (46%).

And, consistent with their preference for diplomacy over military action, nearly three out of four respondents, including 69% of Republicans, said the U.S. should act primarily through the U.N. Security Council, rather than unilaterally, in dealing with Iran’s nuclear program.

Meanwhile, a second public opinion poll released Tuesday by The New York Times and CBS News found a slight majority (51%) of 1,009 respondents who said they would support the U.S. taking military action in order to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

That poll, which did not offer an option for continued diplomacy or negotiations, found that 36% of respondents would oppose such a strike. The remaining 13% said they were unsure.

Asked what the U.S. should do if Israel conducted its own unilateral strike, a 47% plurality said Washington should support the Jewish state, 42% said it should “not get involved,” and only 1% said the U.S. should oppose it.

The two surveys were released just days after last week’s annual policy conference of the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), whose 13,000 activist-attendees were addressed by Netanyahu and President Barack Obama, among other luminaries, before fanning out across Capitol Hill to lobby their elected representatives for a more-confrontational U.S. stance toward Iran and its nuclear program.

Top Israeli leaders, including Netanyahu during his visit to Washington, have been suggesting for several months they were prepared to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities some time this year unless Tehran agreed to abandon its nuclear program.

The Obama administration, on the other hand, has made clear, especially over the past three months, that unprecedented economic sanctions, combined with renewed negotiations with Iran by the so-called P5+1 (U.S., Britain, France, Russia, and China, plus Germany) should be given more time to reach a diplomatic settlement. Britain and France have also come out publicly during the past week against an Israeli strike.

It is not yet clear what was the impact, if any, of the AIPAC conference on popular attitudes.

On the one hand, the results in the Times/CBS poll — which was conducted over four days (March 7-11) immediately after the conference — about U.S. military action against Iran were essentially no different from those of polls conducted over the past three years that also asked respondents whether they would support or oppose a U.S. strike against Iran to prevent it from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

On the question of how the U.S. should react to an Israeli attack on Iran, on the other hand, the latest poll suggested an increase in support for Israel when compared to a Pew Research Center poll just one month ago in which 51% of respondents said Washington should “stay neutral” under such circumstances.

At the same time, 42% of respondents supported Obama’s “handling of the situation in Iran,” while 39% opposed. But the PIPA poll, which was conducted during the conference (March 3- 7), probed far more deeply into attitudes about an Israeli strike against Iran and related issues, noted Peter Ferenbach, an expert on foreign policy attitudes and co-founder of ReThink Media, an organization works with nonprofit groups.

“It’s a welcome exploration of what Americans really think about Iran’s nuclear program, and, not surprisingly, people’s responses are more nuanced when the issue is explored in depth,” he told IPS, adding that the “policy debate has been ill-served by a long string of poorly designed polls on this critical issue.”

“The phrasing of the Times/CBS poll — ‘Do you favor using military action against Iran to prevent the country from acquiring nuclear weapons?’ — has a built-in efficacy bias that presumes a military strike would end Iran’s nuclear program, a view held by virtually no one at the Pentagon.”

Indeed, the PIPA poll found that most respondents were pessimistic about the effects of a military strike on Iran’s nuclear program. Only one in five (18%) said they believed that an Israeli military strike will delay Iran’s alleged ambition to acquire nuclear weapons by more than five years.

A 51% majority said they thought a strike would either delay Iran’s ability to produce a weapon by only one to two years (20%), or would have no effect (9%), or would actually result in Iran accelerating its nuclear program (22%).

Interestingly, those percentages were similar to the findings of a survey of Israeli public opinion on the same question conducted late last month by Shibley Telhami, a fellow at the Brookings Institution and the Sadat chair at the University of Maryland, which co-sponsored the PIPA poll.

In a widely noted interview on CBS’s popular 60 Minutes public-affairs program Sunday, former Israeli Mossad chief Meir Dagan also noted that an Israeli strike could at best delay Iran’s program.

A 51% majority in the PIPA poll also said an Israeli attack would either strengthen the regime (30%) or would have no effect on its hold on power (21%), while 42% said the regime would be weakened.

Moreover, only one in five respondents said they believed armed conflict between Iran and Israel would last either days or weeks. Three of four respondents said they believed such a conflict would last months (26%) or years (48%).

“One of the reasons Americans are so cool toward the idea of Israel attacking Iran’s nuclear program is that most believe that it is not likely to produce much benefit,” said Steven Kull, PIPA’s director.

Nearly six in 10 respondents (58%) said they thought Iran has decided to build nuclear weapons and is actively working toward that aim, an assertion that is at odds with the consensus view of the U.S. intelligence community, which most recently concluded that, while Tehran “is developing some of the technical ability necessary to produce nuclear weapons, [it] has not decided whether to produce them.”

Thirty percent of respondents agreed with the latter position, while only 6% accepted Iran’s repeated assertions that it is producing enriched uranium for civilian purposes only.

Asked to assume that Iran actually developed nuclear weapons, 62% of respondents said they believed the regime would likely use them to attack Israel, as opposed to only 32% who thought it would be deterred from doing so for fear of being destroyed in a nuclear retaliatory strike.

(Inter Press Service)

Dark horizon over the USA.......the JEW police state is coming.

.
.
.
.

Exclusive: Government Activating FEMA Camps Across U.S.

Kurt Nimmo and Alex Jones at Infowars.com

Infowars.com has received a document originating from Halliburton subsidiary KBR that provides details on a push to outfit FEMA and U.S. Army camps around the United States. Entitled “Project Overview and Anticipated Project Requirements,” the document describes services KBR is looking to farm out to subcontractors. The document was passed on to us by a state government employee who wishes to remain anonymous for obvious reasons.

Services up for bid include catering, temporary fencing and barricades, laundry and medical services, power generation, refuse collection, and other services required for temporary “emergency environment” camps located in five regions of the United States.

Internment Camp Services Bid Arrives After NDAA

KBR’s call for FEMA camp service bids arrives soon after the Senate overwhelmingly passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which permits the military to detain and interrogate supposed domestic terror suspects in violation of the Fourth Amendment and Posse Comitatus.

Section 1031 of the NDAA bill declares the whole of the United States as a “battlefield” and allows American citizens to be arrested on U.S. soil and incarcerated in Guantanamo Bay.

A number of civil liberties groups have come out in strong opposition to the legislation, most notably the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), the nation’s oldest and largest Asian American civil and human rights organization.

In a letter addressed to Congress, S. Floyd Mori, the national director of JACL, said the NDAA is the first time that Congress has scaled back on the protections provided by the Non-Detention Act of 1971. Mori said the legislation, if enacted and put into use, would be reminiscent of the unconstitutional indefinite detention of Japanese Americans during World War II.

Police State 4: The Rise of FEMA.

KBR Instrumental in Establishing Camps in 2006

In 2006, KBR was awarded a contingency contract from the Department of Homeland Security, allegedly to support its Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities in the event of an emergency, Market Watch reported.

The contract was effective immediately and provided for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to expand existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs, KBR said. The contract may also provide migrant detention support to other government organizations in the event of an immigration emergency, as well as the development of a plan to react to a national emergency, such as a natural disaster, the company explained.

The 45 regions indicated in the KBR document.

Army Releases Civilian Inmate Labor Program Document

Soon after KBR’s announcement, a little-known Army document surfaced. Entitled the “Civilian Inmate Labor Program,” the unclassified document describes in detail Army Regulation 210-35. The regulation, first drafted in 1997, underwent a “rapid act revision” in January 2005 and now provides a policy for the creation of labor programs and prison camps on Army installations.

National Emergency Centers Act

In 2009, the National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645 was introduced in Congress. It mandates the establishment of “national emergency centers” to be located on military installations for the purpose of providing “temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster,” according to the bill.

In addition to emergencies, the legislation is designed to “meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security,” an open ended mandate which many fear could mean the forced detention of American citizens in the event of widespread rioting after a national emergency or total economic collapse, as Paul Joseph Watson noted in January of 2009.

Clergy response teams.

Also in 2009, the Army National Guard began posting advertisements calling for Internment/Resettlement Specialists, a fact noted by Infowars.com, Prison Planet.com and other alternative media outlets but ignored by the establishment media.

Precursor: Rex 84 Mass Detention Operation

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the Mexican/US border, the same pretense used in the language of the KBR request for services.

During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign military commanders to take over state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens determined by the government to be “national security threats.”

Rex 84 was devised by Col. Oliver North, who was with the NSC and appointed liaison to FEMA. John Brinkerhoff, the deputy director of “national preparedness” programs for FEMA, and North designed the plan on a 1970 report written by FEMA chief Louis Giuffrida, at the Army War College, which proposed the detention of up to 21 million “American Negroes” in the event of a black militant uprising in the United States.

DHS Coordinating Occupy Arrests

Following a crackdown by police on Occupy Wall Street protesters around the nation, Oakland, California, mayor Jean Quan mentioned during an interview with the BBC that she was on a conference call with leaders of 18 US cities shortly before a wave of raids broke up Occupy Wall Street encampments across the country. It was later discovered that the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and other federal police agencies had coordinated the often violent response to the protests.

New York Rep. Peter King, who heads up the House Homeland Security Subcommittee, signaled a sense of urgency when he said the federal government has “to be careful not to allow this movement to get any legitimacy. I’m taking this seriously in that I’m old enough to remember what happened in the 1960′s when the left-wing took to the streets and somehow the media glorified them and it ended up shaping policy. We can’t allow that to happen.”

The federal government responded similarly in the 1960s and 70s when the FBI organized and unleashed its unconstitutional secret police under the covert banner of COINTELPRO.

In addition to the DHS characterizing Americans supporting states’ rights and the Constitution as terrorists, the Defense Department’s Antiterrorism and Force Protection Annual Refresher Training Course in 2009 advised its personnel that political protest amounts to “low-level terrorism.”

Elements of the Police State Coming Together

The KBR document is more evidence that the federal government has established internment camps and plans to fill them with dissidents and anti-government activists that have been demonized consistently by the establishment media.

The NDAA was crafted precisely to provide the legal mechanism for tasking the military to round up activists it conflates with al-Qaeda terrorists. The plan was initially envisioned by Rex 84 and in particular Operation Garden Plot, an operational plan to use the Army, USAF, Navy, and Marine Corp. in direct support of civil disturbance control operations. It has since added numerous elements under the rubric of Continuity of Government, the overall war on terror, civil disturbance and emergency response.

The government has patiently put into place the crucial elements of its police state grid and overarching plan for the internment of political enemies.

We are quite literally one terror event away from the plan going live. As the DHS and the establishment media keep telling us, the next terror event will be on American soil and not the work of al-Qaeda but domestic patriot political groups. The FBI has specialized in creating domestic terrorists – or rather patsies – and shifting the blame over to their political enemies.

Fixed elections.

.
.
.
.
In America, the land of the pretense, greed and NARCISSISM where elections are fixed by the Jews, Obama has already been chosen by Jew Central for a second term.

The Jewish vaudeville known as the American Presidential election process which lasts for 15 months, THEREFORE is in reality a carefully orchestrated Jewish scam and a sham pretense.

In the Iowa Straw poll (homely wholesome gentile name.....anything but) Michele Bachmann the Israel loving whore was given first place over that of Ron Paul, who was the natural winner of the debate. As one notes Bachmann is dumber than Palin, so it defy's logic how she could be a winner in any debate......even granted that she comes from Minnesota.

So the JEWSA electorate are going to be given "two choices": an incumbent President who loves Israel and will commit to any war for the country, and on the Republican side a candidate who wants even more wars for Israel......... even before Israel canvasses for them. The JEW JEW parameters are thus set for the US of A.

Hallelujahs!

____________________________

Bachmann wins Iowa straw polls, takes lead in Republican presidential hopeful

By Times of India and PTI

Minnesota congresswoman Michele Bachmann, took an early lead among the crowded Republican presidential hopefuls when she won the Iowa straw polls.

The day was also marked by Texas governor Rick Perry announcing that he is running for presidency. He was, however, not part of the Iowa Straw poll.

According to the results declared, Bachmann got 4,823 votes out of the nearly 17,000 votes. She was followed closely by Ron Paul of Texas who received 4,671 votes. Tim Pawlenty came in as distant third.

"Tonight, we sent a message together that we intend to make President Obama a one-term president," Bachmann said on her Twitter page soon after she was declared winner of the straw poll, which is the first indication of who is leading the Republican presidential hopefuls which now number nearly 10.

"We just crossed a very important hurdle, but it's the first one," she said. "This is a wonderful result today and we couldn't be more grateful to the people of Iowa," Bachmann said.

The result was a bit surprising for Pawlenty, who so far has spent most time and energy among all the Republican presidential hopefuls. In fact, Pawlenty was involved in heated exchange with Bachmann over the presidential debate.

"We made progress in moving from the back of the pack into a competitive position for the caucuses, but we have a lot more work to do. This is a long process to restore America -- we are just beginning and I'm looking forward to a great campaign," Pawlenty said in a statement.

The results were also a disappointing for Paul. "Dr Paul is surging in this race, and today's results show the strength of his grassroots support and top notch organization. These straw poll results, our growing poll numbers and our strong fundraising shows that our message is resonating with Iowans and Americans everywhere," Paul campaign spokesman Jesse Benton said in a statement.

Even though Bachmann yesterday emerged as the front runner among Republican presidential hopefuls; but two major Republican players were not in the Iowa Straw poll.

The former Alaska Governor, Sarah Palin, is yet to declare her candidacy. Rick Perry declared his candidacy only yesterday and was not on the straw poll ballot.

Murdoch and the Zionist Media empire.

.
.
.
.

From Mike Rivero's comment at www.whatreallyhappened.com:

The Murdoch scandal taints the entire establishment media and leaves us with two questions that must be asked.

1. At a time when most corporate media struggle to meet payroll, what is the source of the vast sums of cash Rupert used to buy up a large chunk of the world's media (and I think the article below answers that question).

2. How does a foreign national come to control so much of America's media?

Murdoch’s Deeply Hidden Jewish Roots — A Biography (2003)

By Christopher Bollyn – American Free Press
Veteran's Today blog
Whatreallyhappened.blog

Christopher Bollyn is an investigative journalist who has written extensively on the events of September 11, 2001 in the Washington-based American Free Press. He has researched different aspects of the 9/11 attacks and uncovered facts and evidence that challenge the official version of events. The ADL tried to smear Bollyn as an “anti-Semite” in order to discredit him and diminish the significance of his work. At the helm of both organizations, the ADL and Fox News, is an Australian-born Zionist named Keith Rupert Murdoch.

Murdoch’s Jewish Roots

Murdoch “became an American citizen for business reasons,” according to Richard H. Curtiss, editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Keith Rupert was born in Melbourne, Australia, on March 11, 1931. “Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox Jew,” Curtiss wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”

Murdoch’s father married Elisabeth Joy Greene, daughter of Rupert Greene in 1928. They had one son, Keith Rupert and three daughters. Later in life, Keith Rupert chose to use Rupert, the first name of his Jewish maternal grandfather.

The young Keith Rupert was educated at Australia’s fashionable Geelong private school, and went on to the elitist and aristocratic Oxford University in England, according to Candour (UK) magazine.

“Rupert’s father Sir Keith Murdoch attained his prominent position in Australian society through a fortuitous marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene. Through his wife’s connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked. There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm, two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a faraway mining town,” Candour wrote in 1984. “For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew.”

While Murdoch may have “tried to hide” his Jewish roots, he has been quite forthright about his support for extreme right-wing Zionists, such as Benjamin Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon.

Netanyahu, who wrote a book entitled The War on Terror: How the West Can Win in 1986, is a frequent commentator on Murdoch’s Fox News.

Murdoch’s support for Zionism extremists is well known and a matter of record. As New York Governor George Pataki said, “There is no newspaper in the U.S. more supportive of Israel than the [Murdoch’s] New York Post.”

It is through a network of Zionist organizations, in which Murdoch plays a central role, that Murdoch is connected to the individuals who arranged the privatization – and obtained control of the World Trade Center – shortly before its destruction.

These key individuals are: Larry Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, the lease holders of dubious repute who gained control of the WTC property six weeks before 9/11, and Port Authority Chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg, who authorized the transfer of the leases.

Murdoch belongs to, and has been honored by, a number of leading Zionist organizations in which Silverstein, Lowy, and Eisenberg all hold senior positions. These organizations include the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), and the New York-based Museum of Jewish Heritage – A Living Memorial to the Holocaust.

Fifty days before 9/11, Silverstein Properties and Lowy’s Westfield America secured 99-year leases on the WTC. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey turned control of the World Trade Center over to the private hands of Silverstein and Lowy on July 24, 2001.

Silverstein and Lowy then took control of the 10.6 million-square-foot complex, which included the twin towers office buildings and two nine-story office buildings. Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Lowy then controlled all access to the World Trade Center.

Lowy leased the shopping concourse called the Mall at the World Trade Center, which comprised about 427,000 square feet of retail space.

“Six weeks before the WTC towers were destroyed, the Port Authority completed the process of leasing them for 99 years to Larry Silverstein, the developer who had built 7 World Trade Center [which mysteriously self-demolished at 5:25 p.m. on 9/11].

“Simultaneously, the retail space underneath the complex was leased to Westfield America, the US division of an Australian company that is one of the world’s largest operators of shopping malls.” Paul Goldberger wrote in New Yorker, May 20, 2002.

“Silverstein and Westfield were given the right to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed, and Westfield has the right to expand the retail space by 30 percent,” Goldberger wrote.

Silverstein is suing for some $7.2 billion in insurance money for the loss of the destroyed World Trade Center – and his expected earnings – for property he had leased with a down payment of $100 million – of borrowed funds.

Murdoch the Zionist

“Murdoch is a close friend of Ariel Sharon,” Sam Kiley, The Times (UK) veteran journalist on the Middle East wrote about the man who took over the once famous British paper. Kiley said Murdoch’s friendship with the Israeli prime minister had caused senior staff at the paper to rewrite important copy.

“Murdoch’s executives were so afraid of irritating him that, when I pulled off a little scoop of tracking down and photographing the unit in the Israeli army which killed Mohammed al-Durrah, the 12-year-old boy whose death was captured on film and became the iconic image of the conflict, I was asked to file the piece ‘without mentioning the dead kid.’” Kiley wrote. “After that conversation, I was left wordless, so I quit.”

Sharon and Murdoch are old friends. On Oct. 15, 1982, a month after the massacres of thousands of Palestinian refugees in the Sabra and Shatila camps of Beirut, war crimes which occurred under Sharon’s direct command, the Israeli defense minister held meetings with Rupert Murdoch and others, reportedly in order to advance his “West Bank real estate grab.”

The visit with Sharon included a trip for Murdoch and his editors from New York and London that “took them on a bird’s-eye tour of Israel aboard a helicopter gunship, flying over the Golan Heights, West Bank and settlements.”

“I have always believed in the future of Israel and the goals of the international Jewish community,” Murdoch said at a spring fund-raiser for the Museum of Jewish Heritage – A Living Memorial to the Holocaust on April 29, 2001.

From the beginning, News Corp., his global media company, “has been supportive of the Jewish national cause,” Murdoch said.

Larry Silverstein, who had not yet acquired the lease on the World Trade Center, attended the fund-raiser with Murdoch and reportedly said about museum chairman Robert Morgenthau’s plans to expand the museum: “I’ll support you…as long as you keep it under 110 stories.”

Murdoch and the ADL

“Henry Kissinger, Rupert Murdoch and Mortimer Zuckerman are on the [ADL] dinner committee,” according to a recent New York Times report on the ADL’s recent fund-raiser in which the controversial Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi received the ADL’s Distinguished Statesman Award.

Silverstein and Eisenberg have both held senior leadership positions with the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a billion dollar Zionist “charity” organization, to which Murdoch and Lowy generously contribute. In 1997, Henry Kissinger presented Murdoch with the UJA’s award for “Humanitarian of the Year.”

Silverstein is a former chairman of UJA. This organization raises hundreds of millions of dollars every year for a network of Zionist agencies in the United States and Israel. Eisenberg, who was instrumental in obtaining the lease for Silverstein, is on the Planning Board of UJA.

Eisenberg in his role with the Port Authority was the key person who negotiated the 99-year leases for Silverstein and Frank Lowy’s Westfield America, who were in fact the low-bidders for the lease on the 110-story towers and the retail mall.

Murdoch and the Czechoslovakian-born Israeli commando Frank Lowy, a former fighter in Israel’s Golani Brigade, who emigrated to Australia in the 1950s, have had a long friendship, which Murdoch recounted during an American Australian Association fund-raising dinner in honor of Frank’s son, Peter S. Lowy, in New York on November 20, 2002. Larry Silverstein and his wife also attended the American Australian event.

Some reporters refer to the American Australian Association, whose membership includes James Wolfensohn, the president of the World Bank, who raised cash for Rupert Murdoch when he first expanded into the United States, as “the kangaroo mafia.”

“Frank was a brave and determined fighter,” Rafi Kocer, Lowy’s former commander, said. Lowy has donated some $350,000 to build a memorial museum in Israel for his former brigade.

Today, Lowy and his three sons control Westfield Corporation, one of the largest operators of shopping centers in the United States – and the world.

Insured Against Terrorist Attacks

On September 12, 2001, The Jerusalem Post reported: “Frank Lowy, who emigrated to Australia from Israel in 1952, owns the 99-year lease for the 425,000 square foot retail portion of the destroyed World Trade Center…Westfield said today that it has insurance cover against terrorist attacks and its earnings will not be materially affected.”

Lowy, is described by the Sydney Morning Herald as “a self-made man with a strong interest in the Holocaust and Israeli politics.”

________________________

“Did Rupert Murdoch Have Prior Knowledge of 9-11?”

http://www.bollyn.com/9-11-archive-2003#article_11938

Latino USA, multi-ethnic JEWSA.

.
.
.
.
In 30 years time European Americans will be a minority in the USA, constituting about 38 percent of the population, by 2042.

























A beautiful Hispanic baby from Arizona, Texas, California and New Mexico.

With "ethnic minorities" dominating the USA, and thus translated into the political system of the country, the JEWSA state policies must necessarily change to reflect the changing demographic reality, domestically and in the foreign policy field.

Perhaps less enthusiasm for Israel and its Likud led strategic policies.

A more overtly sincere South American policy, with their cousins south of the border.

Support for the creation of a Palestinian state, and the right of return for ALL Palestinians to Palestine.

No more wars against nations of color for oil, heroin, or for Israel's strategic interests.

Think, think, think South Africa as a regime during Apartheid, and into 1991.......with extremely close relations with Israel trying to sell them the bomb, carrying out joint destabilization ops in Angola, Mozambique......and every where else in Africa...AND South Africa now, the rainbow nation at peace with the whole world, making good contributions to the world.

Yes I think this multiculturalism will be good for the world as the USA relates to the rest of the world. We may still have the problems of the UK and France running
amuck in the world, but perhaps in the future the "Dutch courage" that these two European JEW run states receive from the current JEWSA in the international field will be less forth coming from an "ethnically dominated" USA.

China as the New hyper Superpower will perhaps be moderate, gentle and considerate when dealing with the rest of the world. Save for wars against Korea, Japan and Vietnam over the 2 millennium, China doesn't have racist based colonial history which is embedded in exploitation of other nations. The greatness of China has been achieved through the hard work and genius of her people. There are no Jews in China, and maybe in the future China will adopt a state philosophy centered around Confucius, and finally ditch Jew Communism. China is not a Communist state any way, not in the pure Marxist sense.

The USA is an Occidental Jew run power, that is presently engaged in several wars against mainly Greater Middle East countries. The Jews want to use the USA to expand their global power, and further their perception of what is in Israel's best interests. There are between 8--9 million JEWS in the USA, and they have absolute control of the JEWSA Media, Politics.....finance, academia, industry....and the psychology of the country (The JEWSA thinks like JEWS).

A major technique of the JEW power in the USA has been to use crypto-Jews in American public life to subversively further Jewish causes, WITHOUT OVERTLY appearing to push for Jewish interests which might otherwise create a backlash. But given their dominance of the USA, Jews these days tend to be more overt in pushing for their particular interests. However over the years they have used politicians such as Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Truman, Eisenhower, LB Johnson, GW Bush senior, Clinton, GW Bush junior and Barack Obama-------ALL crypto-Jews into power to further their agenda within both the Republican Party and the overtly run Jewish Party of the Democrats.

The Jews funded WWI, and directed and funded WWII. An USA run by "ethnic minorities" in the future MIGHT SEE LESS need to wage constant wars in foreign countries which fit the mystical designs of the Jewish New World Order and the Talmud Torah complex imbibed by the rabbi in every JEW from an early age...."THE EARTH BELONGS TO JEWS SO SAYS YESHIVA, AND ALL HUMANS ARE GOYIM SUB-HUMANS TO BE EXPLOITED".

There of course are many Latino's who are crypto-Jews, but a truly multi-ethnic state of the USA, will be less strategically controlled by the JEWS.

The future is good for ALL, and humans around the world will be able to visit Disneyland and other attractions in the USA without coming across anally retentive Americans in security.

The JEWSA will not become a JEW run gulag security state. 10 million Americans will not be interned in FEMA concentration camps, where they will be starved, tortured and killed by JEW camp masters. ........as happened in the JEW run SOVIET UNION, and 60 million Soviets perished.

The JEW is a paranoid paradox. The JEW loves Occidental society of the West, because that is where the JEW chooses to live, exclusively. The JEW loves Occidental culture and civilization. On the other hand the JEW also loathes Occidentals as they know the JEW better than anybody else. The JEW fears Occidentals because the JEW thinks Occidentals are capable people, above that of the average goyim. Thus better placed to challenge the JEW, and his clever conspiracies.

The JEW especially since 1965, have thus flooded the USA with "lesser goyim" according to their perceptions, to weaken the power of the Dominant Occidental. In the process of doing so they may have sown their own downfall in the USA. The JEW is too clever.

_________________________________

'Non-whites will be new majority in US'

By Presstv.com

An American research institute says the face of the country will be changed over the next 30 years and Caucasians will no longer be the majority.

In a report titled Prosperity 2050, the PolicyLink institute presented The Map of America's Tomorrow, which depicts the changing face of the American population decade by decade.

PolicyLink focuses on programs that promote social and economic equity within the United Sates.

Featured in the report, African Americans, Hispanics, Latinos and Asians will account for more than 50 percent of the population by 2042 and Caucasians will no longer be the majority.

PolicyLink's chief executive officer and founder, Angela Glover Blackwell, said the study and the map show that the success and the future of the United States will depend on the success of people from other ethnic backgrounds.

She also believes that the new information could shed light on and modify equitable policies. The current social status and wealth discrepancies between different demographics could be detrimental to the future of the United States.

The faces of American children are changing and many believe that the still white majority population and the political leaders do not see themselves in these new faces.

Researchers hope the study can promote the idea of just and fair inclusion, as the next generation of Americans needs to be supported and encouraged, regardless of their skin color.

_______________________________

The Moron Masses

.
.
.
.

In India Goondawood, funded by the Indian underworld with Ibrahim Dawood, and cricket fills the empty void of the poverty stricken masses. This is their escapism, and their short lived moments away from the reality of the daily grind of the one meal a day, the smell, dust, noise, crowd..........where they for a while at least put all their hopes, aspirations, angst and fear into non-existent OTT pantomime characters from Goondawood (unlike Western audiences, Indian cinema audiences are very animated, because they live in their films).

And a few young men who have become skilled at hitting, catching, bowling a wooden ball wrapped by leather.

To be part of the moron masses in the richest country on earth is still to be envied to a certain degree. To be part of the poverty stricken masses in India, and in addition to be exploited by the elite of that country who loot its wealth and deposit the nations wealth in off shore accounts......because they fundamentally have no faith in their own country, that is to be truly pitied by non-Indians, and loathed by Indians themselves.

A nations destiny rests not on the masses, but essentially on the elite, and especially the intellectual elite.

Its is their efforts and designs which determine the future of a nation and the well being of the masses. In India's case now it is led by an Italian lady with no education, and a weak imperial ICS, left behind by the British. Thus India stumbles along into the future with the largest population on earth in the near future, with no infrastructure...........and many more poverty stricken individuals.

______________________________________


American Idolatry Intensifies as Nation Sinks into Depression

Programmed zombies get hysterical about basketball while their future is being destroyed. Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com

The sight of American citizens gathering to protest basketball player LeBron James’ decision to join Miami Heat last week, after Ohio Governor Ted Strickland joined celebrities to serenade James in a bizarre appeal video entitled “We are LeBron,” was a shocking reminder of how millions of Americans are more concerned about sports teams than the fact that their country is collapsing around them, and how potent a threat such wanton delusion is to the survival of freedom and prosperity in the United States.

In a You Tube clip that went viral after appearing on the Drudge Report website, Alex Jones explained how ominous it was to see Americans transfixed by bread and circuses while at the same time the New York Times reports on how the country is sinking into another depression.

But how did we reach the stage where scenes from Idiocracy, a satirical movie set 500 years in the future where humanity has “degenerated into into a dystopia where advertising, commercialism, and cultural anti-intellectualism run rampant and dysgenic pressure has resulted in a uniformly stupid human society devoid of individual responsibility or consequences,” seem eerily contemporary in 2010?

Americans are watching more television than ever before, both through conventional TV sets and on the web, as the range of channels continues to expand, the screens get bigger and the quality of the picture increases as new hi-definition and 3D technologies arrest and shorten attention spans to a greater and greater degree.

Americans are now a nation of spectators, watching a shocking average of nearly 5 hours of TV a day, up 20% from just 10 years ago.

Hooked in to this matrix medium that tells them how to behave, what to care about, and how to treat people who deviate from this spoon-fed consensus, people are literally being programmed into accepting a contrived false reality that bears little or no resemblance to what is actually taking place in the real world. This is why the assembly line of zombies being manufactured by this process will roll their eyes when warned about real issues that affect them – the crumbling economy, unemployment, the BP oil spill – yet will become visibly upset when an event that has no bearing on their existence whatsoever, like where LeBron James throws a basketball around, takes place.

We are literally being trained like dogs to react to meaningless stimuli while burying our heads in the sand in reaction to issues of real significance. This behavior training encompasses an entire outlook, an entire lifestyle that people have adopted to the point where their moral compass, they way they dress, the way they speak, what they eat, what drugs they take, the way they respond to events and how they treat other people is solely a construct of the babylon system to which they are addicted.

The fact that this matrix system constantly promotes damaging and destructive messages is why people are fat, unhealthy, unhappy, addicted to drugs, and unsuccessful in maintaining relationships. They are a product of their brainwashing. Downloading viruses from an infected culture on a daily basis, people’s hard drives – their brains – are corrupted, lethargic, and barely able to function. This is why people seek out destructive pursuits that do nothing to benefit their long-term personal interests. This is why people no longer talk to their neighbors or get involved in their communities. This is why people care more about LeBron James than their own country collapsing around them – because that’s the content of the programming they have downloaded.

The controllers of this babylon system have superimposed a fantasy world over reality, they have slapped blinkers over the eyes of millions of Americans who continue to lead deluded, stunted and oblivious lives while the criminals behind the curtain scheme to wreck the country. A perfect example of this is how the government keeps insisting that the economy is getting better while in reality unemployment grows, tent cities pop up in major areas and the housing market gets worse.

When Americans know more about baseball and basketball than they do about their own history – to the point now where as a recent Jay Leno clip exemplified, college professors can’t even relate basic facts about the founding of the country – America is in danger.

America used to be the source of the best and the brightest, but the ravages of a 21st century entertainment monster has contributed to plunging test scores allied to weaker curriculums as American school children continue to be outperformed by their counterparts even in third world countries like Costa Rica.

Freedom and prosperity can only continue to exist in a country where informed and active citizens act as watchmen and women to protect those virtues. History has taught us that decadence, moral and intellectual decay are always followed by a collapse in society as darkness fills in the void that good has vacated.

Americans have to look themselves in the mirror and decide whether or not worshipping LeBron James is worth the price of a destitute and demoralized country in which living standards are eviscerated and freedoms are easily revoked.

Imagine if Americans got as angry and upset about the fact that their country is being seized by criminal globalist interests who want to destroy the United States in pursuit of a global government as they do when their sports team loses or their star player is transferred?

Our job is to issue a jolt of shock therapy to millions of hypnotized Americans who have the establishment-imposed mantra running through their heads that everything will be OK as long as they just continue to ignore reality and keep their head buried in American Idol or the NBA season.

Only through a massive media backlash can we reach people and make them understand that they have been conditioned into accepting a false sense of reality and that real happiness and fulfillment can only be achieved, and that America can only be rescued, once they fully embrace the truth of what is really happening around them.

The Empire's decline: America's corrupted coopted Supreme Court

.
.
.
.

Elena Kagan and the Supreme Court: A Barnyard Smell in Chicago, Harvard and Washington

"President Obama has nominated Elena Kagan for Justice of the United States Supreme Court on the basis of an academic publication record, which might give her a fighting chance for tenure at a first rate correspondence law school in the Texas Panhandle." By Professor James Petras.

A review of her published scholarship after almost two decades in and out of academia turns up four law review articles, two brief pieces and several book reviews and in memoriam. There is nothing even remotely resembling a major legal text or research publication.
.
Her lack-luster academic publication record is only surpassed by her total lack of any practical experience as a judge: zero years in adjudication, unless one accepts the line of her exuberant advocates, who point to Kagan’s superb ability in adjudicating among the squabbling faculty at Harvard Law School when she served as Dean. No doubt Kagan had been very busy as the greatest fundraising Law School Dean in Harvard’s history ($400 million), which may account for the fact that she never found time to write a single academic article during her nine year tenure (2001-2009).
.
The criteria for her appointment to the Supreme Court have little to do with academic performance as it is understood today in all major universities. Nor does her total inexperience as a judicial advocate compensate for academic mediocrity.
.
The evidence points to a purely political appointment based, in part, on social networks and certainly not on her lack of affinity for the agenda of the liberal wing of the Democratic Party. Kagan’s approval of indefinite detention of suspects squares with the extremist restrictions on constitutional freedoms first articulated during the Bush Administration and subsequently upheld by President Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder. It is no coincidence that Kagan appointed a notorious Bush torture advocate, the genial Jack Goldsmith, to the Harvard Law faculty.
.
Elena Kagan’s appointment certainly was not based on “diversity”. She will be the third Jew on the Supreme Court and, together with the six Roman Catholics, will decide the most critical cases with far-reaching and profound impact on citizens’ rights and protections. For the first time in US history the nation’s largest demographic group, the Protestants (of any hue or gender), will have no representative on the Court, thereby excluding the descendents, like retiring Justice Stevens, of the brilliant, strongly secular judicial heritage that formulated the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and its amendments.
.
Kagan’s nomination to the US Supreme Court is not exceptional if we consider many of Bush and now Obama’s choices of advisers and officials in top policymaking posts. Many of these officials combined their diplomas from Ivy League universities with their absolutely disastrous performances in public office, which no amount of mass media puff pieces could obscure.

(Well prof. disastrous for the USA obviously, but not for Israel it seems)

These Ivy League mediocrities include the foreign policy advocates for the destructive and unending wars in the Middle East and Afghanistan and the leading economic advisers and officials responsible for the current financial debacles. The names are familiar enough: Wolfowitz, Feith, Abrams, Levey, Greenspan, Axelrod, Emmanuel, Indyk, Ross, Summers, Rubin, et al: Prestigious credentials with mediocre, or worse, performances. What is the basis of their rise? What explains their ascent to the most influential positions in the US power structure?

(As with the UK and its Public school system which grooms the future elite of the country, and so with the USA, the "Tribal network" which professor Kevin MacDonald so eloquently talks and write about plays a major role in the unofficial backhand promotion of such God's Gift to Mankind geniuses and also into USA Public Office.......nothing to do with wholesome deserving merit; its who you know, and not what you know or your true ability....is this not the reality)
.
One hypothesis is nepotism... of a certain kind. Elena Kagan got tenure at the august halls of the University of Chicago in 1995 on the basis of one substantive article and one brief piece, neither outstanding. With this underwhelming record of legal scholarship, she became visiting professorship at the Harvard Law School, published only two more articles (one in Harvard Law Review) and received tenure. Prima facie evidence strongly suggests that Kagan’s ties to the staunchly Zionist faculty at both Chicago and Harvard Law Schools (and not her intellectual prowess) account for her meteoric promotions to tenure, deanship and now the US Supreme Court, over the heads of hundreds of other highly qualified candidates with far superior academic publication records and broader practical judicial experience.
.
The public utterances and political writings of innumerable Harvard, Princeton, Chicago, Yale, John Hopkins professors, whether it be on the speculative economy, Israel’s Middle East wars, preventative detention, broad presidential powers and constitutional freedoms are marked by a singular mediocrity, mendacity and an excess of hot air reeking of the barnyard.
.
If you do not qualify on the basis of excellent scholarship or broad-based practical experience, your ethnic tribesman will wax ecstatic over you as a “wonder colleague”, a “superb teacher”, a “brilliant consensus builder” and a “world champion fund raiser”. In other words, if you have the right ethnic connections and political ambitions, they can adjust the criteria for tenure at the University of Chicago, the deanship at Harvard Law School and a lifetime appointment to the US Supreme Court.
.
Elena Kagan joins a long list of key Obama appointees who have long-standing ties to the pro-Israel power configuration. Like Barack Obama, Elena Kagan started her legal apprenticeship with the Chicago Judge Abner Mitva, an ardent Zionist, who hailed the newly elected President Obama as “America’s first Jewish President”, probably his soundest judgment.
.
The issue of the composition of the US Supreme Court is increasingly crucial for all Americans, who are horrified by Israel’s devastation of Gaza, its threats to launch a nuclear attack on Iran and its Fifth Column’s efforts to drag us into a third war in ten years. With the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations pressing the compliant US Congress to declare “anti-Zionism” as a form of “anti-Semitism” and “opposition to Israel’s policies” as amounting to “support for terrorism”, thus criminalizing Americans critical of Israel, another active pro-Zionist advocate on the Court will provide a legal cover for the advance of Zionist-dictated authoritarianism over the American people.
.
Yes, Kagan would be another woman on the Supreme Court. Yes, she would probably adjudicate conflicts among the judges and strengthen Obama’s police powers. And yes, she would likely favor your indefinite detention if you support the right of Palestinians to struggle (“terrorism”) against the Israeli occupation... especially if you defend America against Israel’s Fifth Column.
.
But remember when you apply for Ivy League law school appointment or a top judicial post and your CV lacks the requisite publications or work experience, just ask Judge Abner Mikva or Larry Summers or Rahm Emmanuel for a recommendation. With such support you will shoot ahead of the competition... because you have the right ethnic connections.

______________________________________


Elena Kagan: Wall Streets SCOTUS pick.

Additional article