.
.
.
.
American Hegemony and unipolar hyperpower, especially under Rehab for alcohol, cocaine-snorting at Yale retard President Bush II, I would strongly suggest are not good for the USA.
FDR in 1945 is another matter.
Political pygmies always clutch defeat from the jaws of victory. Because they are complete idiots.
Since 1991 and the collapse of the Soviet Union, I earnestly have not seen any FDR calibre Presidents.
The problem is unlike 1945, the USA has been held HOSTAGE by GLOBALISTS or Jacob Rothschilds of London.
This process began when 'Ayatollah/CIA ISLAM' 'Arc of Crisis' St. Jimmy one-term Carter became President, the witless Christian evangelical peanut farmer, and ex-Naval Intelligence.
St. Jimmy became President because American Presidential power and traditional American government were delegitimated during the 1970s.
Once you delegitimate something, it is easier to attack and control.(from the point of view of the predatory Globalists)
The NEXT LOGICAL STEP would be a SECURITY PACT or a military dimension to the Eurasian alliance--Formal under International law.
This is what I have argued for since 2016?
Steady NATO expansion East, despite the superficial denials, SHOULD mean a Eurasian security pact.
An incident happens in Ukraine, and Putin rushes to China-meah!?
_________________________________________________________
In 2020, NATO identified China as a 'threat' to the alliance
Russian President Vladimir Putin met with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the Beijing Olympics on Friday. In a show of unity against the West, the two leaders issued a call for a halt to NATO expansion, a key demand in security proposals Putin recently presented to the US.
“The sides oppose further enlargement of NATO and call on the North Atlantic Alliance to abandon its ideologized cold war approaches, to respect the sovereignty, security and interests of other countries, the diversity of their civilizational, cultural and historical backgrounds, and to exercise a fair and objective attitude towards the peaceful development of other States,” the two leaders said in a joint statement.
The fact that Xi is joining Putin in the call is not a surprise. In 2020, NATO issued a report that identified China as one of the top “threats” facing the North Atlantic military alliance. The report called for NATO to boost ties with countries in the Asia Pacific, including Australia, Japan, and South Korea.
Putin and Xi said they were both “seriously concerned” about the new AUKUS military pact between the US, Australia, and Britain that will give Canberra access to nuclear submarine technology. “Russia and China believe that such actions are contrary to the objectives of security and sustainable development of the Asia-Pacific region, increase the danger of an arms race in the region, and pose serious risks of nuclear proliferation,” the two leaders said.
The Western focus on encircling both Russia and China has naturally led to the two countries increasing cooperation, both militarily and economically. US sanctions against both countries have also boosted trade between Moscow and Beijing. Putin announced Friday new gas and oil deals with China, worth an estimated $120 billion.
