Jan 12, 2013

Punjab Pakistan military/ISI failing Failed State Pakistan for gora sahib policy.

.
.
.
.

Massacre In Quetta More Proof That There Is No Justice for Minorities In Pakistan

 
Comment by Peter Chamberlain at Information Clearing House.

[Over the years, Pakistan has dealt with Sunni terrorist outfits massacring Shia and other Pakistani minorities by "outlawing" the groups under their original names, only to allow the same individuals to adopt new names and then carry-on with the business of Sectarian slaughter as usual.  Pakistan only bans names of outfits, without taking any police actions against the criminal members of  the terrorist organizations.  The Pak govt., the Frontier Corps. and the Army all know exactly who is behind the many Hazara murders, Lashkar e-Jhangvi, the latest incarnation of the banned Sipah-e-Sahaba, yet, LeJ criminals remain free to kill at the next opportunity.  This single fact implicates the Pak Army and FC authorities as co-conspirators in every unprosecuted slaughter of Hazara.  Previous and ongoing ties between the Army/ISI and the Sunni militants who have been waging this sectarian war, mostly against Shia "KAFIR" (infidels), helps to prove the case of Pakistan's guilt in acts of genocide against  its own citizens.  If the authorities really wanted to end the terrorist bombings in Shia enclaves, then they would arrest every Sipah or Lashkar member (current or former member), as well as every militant leader such as Hafiz Saeed or Syed Salauddin, and begin filling prisons and "death rows" with the evil men who masquerade as religious "authorities," who are behind this slaughter.  The next step would be to put an end to the Saudi-financed war upon Shiites by closing all Saudi/Arab-funded madrassas and religious institutions.  Without these steps, the unchecked stream of Wahhabi terrorism will help Pakistan to destroy itself with its own self-hatred within a couple of years, at most.]

Massacre in Quetta provides damning indictment of authorities: HRW

dawn


Pakistani police officers and local residents gather on January 10, 2013at the site of a bomb blast that targeted paramilitary soldiers in a commercial area in Quetta, Pakistan. A series of bombings in different parts of Pakistan killed 115 people on Thursday in one of the deadliest days in the country in recent years. — Photo by AP

The Pakistani government’s persistent failure to protect the minority Shia Muslim community in Pakistan from sectarian attacks by Sunni militant groups, is reprehensible and amounts to complicity in the barbaric slaughter of Pakistani citizens, Human Rights Watch said on Thursday. The government should immediately hold accountable those responsible for ordering and participating in deadly attacks targeting the Shia across Pakistan and particularly the Hazara Shia in Quetta, the capital of Balochistan province.

On January 10, at least 4 bomb attacks took place in Quetta killing over 93 and injuring well over 150 people. Those killed included at least 8 police personnel and one journalist.

“2012 was the bloodiest year for Pakistan’s Shia community in living memory and if this latest attack is any indication, 2013 has started on an even more dismal note,” said Ali Dayan Hasan, Pakistan director at Human Rights Watch. “As Shia community members continue to be slaughtered in cold blood, the callousness and indifference of authorities offers a damning indictment of the state, its military and security agencies.

While sectarian violence is a longstanding problem in Pakistan, attacks against ordinary Shia have increased dramatically in recent years, Human Rights Watch said. In 2012, well over 400 members of the Shia population were killed in targeted attacks. Over 120 of these were killed in Balochistan province, the vast majority from the Hazara Shia community.

Similar attacks targeting the Shia population have taken place repeatedly over the last year in Balochistan, the port city of Karachi, predominantly Shia populated areas of Gilgit Baltistan in the northern areas, and in Pakistan’s tribal areas, Human Rights Watch said.

Sunni militant groups such as the ostensibly banned Lashkar-e Jhangvi have operated with widespread impunity across Pakistan while law enforcement officials have effectively turned a blind eye on attacks against Shia communities. Some Sunni extremist groups are known to be allies of the Pakistani military, its intelligence agencies, and affiliated paramilitaries, such as the Frontier Corps, Human Rights Watch said.

While authorities claim to have arrested dozens of suspects in attacks against Shia since 2008, only a handful have been charged, and no one has been held accountable for these attacks.
“Pakistan’s tolerance for religious extremists is not just destroying lives and alienating entire communities, it is destroying Pakistani society across the board,” said Hasan. “Sectarian violence won’t end until those responsible are brought to trial and justice.”

Human Rights Watch urged Pakistan’s federal government and relevant provincial governments to make all possible efforts to promptly apprehend and prosecute those responsible for recent attacks and other crimes targeting the Shia population. The government should direct civilian agencies and the military responsible for security to actively protect those facing attack from extremist groups, and to address the growing perception, particularly in Balochistan and Pakistan’s tribal areas, that state authorities look the other way when Shia are attacked. It should increase the number of security personnel in Shia majority areas and enclaves at high risk of attack, particularly the Hazara community in Quetta. The government should also actively investigate allegations of collusion between Sunni militant groups and military intelligence and paramilitary forces and hold accountable personnel found to be involved in criminal acts.
 
“The Pakistani authorities’ are just indifferent bystanders to slaughter at best or callously supportive of those perpetrating these massacres at worst,” Hasan said. “By their inaction in the face of massacre after massacre and killing after killing, Pakistan’s political leaders, law enforcement agencies, judiciary and military are presiding over a collective failure to address the growing perception that they are either in sympathy with Sunni extremists or utterly incompetent and unable to provide basic security. Either way, this is a crisis that neither Pakistanis nor the world can afford to ignore any more.”

Pedo Jew and the evil, criminal UK state.

.
.
.
.
Sir James Wilson Vincent "Jimmy" Savile OBE....many Jews sinc the Medivel era pretend to be Catholics, whilst in REALIty they are fully practising Jews....Tony Blair, John Kerry, Madeline Albright....Lady Shand-Kidd mother of Diana.
 
How does a man who looks weird and ugly--clownish.

Zero show biz skills---doesn't have an ideal announcer voice, can't act, can't dance, can't sing, can't tell a decent joke, can't host or compare a major show, save the pedo vehicle"Jim'll Fix It" program...... get employment and become a major figure at the BBC for so long, and a national BRITISH FIGURE who is touted by the establishment with 54 years of his criminal habit going unnoticed by one and all?

The Jews in the UK numbering officially at 300,000 and unofficially at 800,000 protected him. The Rothschilds of London are one of the most powerful Jewish families in the UK, and they helped establish the state of Israel IN 1917, and it is alleged organized WWI and WWII with the help of the America Jewish bankers, and the Jewish bankers in Europe, from Frankfurt, Zurich and Paris.....using crypto-Jews in Germany, mainly.

So the Jews have power, and they merely protected one of their own.

But why promote such a talentless, murderous, psychopathic, pedo shit...when there are so many talented Jews in the UK.......Jeremy Paxman, Professor Tony Judt, Helena Bonham Carter, Claire Bloom, Stephen Fry, Andrew Sachs, Jim Rosenthal, Stephen Fry, Mick Hucknall, Yehudi Menuhin............?

Why soil the good work of the many with such a reprobate?

For me the issue is important for two reasons.

I myself was a victim of a pedophile when I was young, in Rawalpindi Pakistan, by a friend of my uncle who lived near us, near "Boys Lane".....took me to his house where I was buggered, and when the deed was done, he brought me a whistle, which I whistled back home crying.

The second reason is the abuse that I have faced from the UK State, from the Police, Security and State entities within the criminal UK State since 1985, without any explanation as to why this is so. An explanation from the UK criminal state would give me a chance for me to adjust myself according to their rules (parole, parole rules).....since I do not know what has upset them, and so I do not have the chance to adjust myself.

Perhaps one explanation, and the only explanation I can think of is that power is generally EVIL, those that wield power are evil, and Jews who wield power are no less evil. For the Jews Savile must have represented a marked seal of their power. 

Savile represented an affirmation of their power within the criminal UK State, and what they could getaway with.

Pedophilia is an acquired habit and taste of sections of the elite, and in protecting Savile the British elite were protecting their own habits.

In the Jewish religion it is alleged ritual child sacrifice is also still practiced rarely, and in abusing children it is something akin to practicing an ancient ritual.

Devil worship and Satanism is also strong among the elite, especially in Jewish elite groups.

Ritual Jewish murder of children may have been one reason why Jews were expelled from England in 1290.

___________________________________

SAVILE STILL PROTECTED BY THE SPOOKS by aangirfan



Sir Jimmy Savile in Israel in 1975. 


Who knew, or did not know, the real Sir Jimmy Savile?

The spooks knew.

Staff at the BBC, including reporters, newsreaders and presenters, were all vetted by MI5. MI5 vetted Savile.



"The Prince of Wales, the BBC director general... celebrities ... ... know the real Savile ... as they paid lavish tribute to a 'unique' personality...

"... did former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who used to invite the former DJ to watch television with her family at Chequers and who agreed his 1990 knighthood.

"And ....... did Pope John Paul II who in the same year made him Knight Commander of the Pontifical Equestrian Order of Saint Gregory the Great – the Roman Catholic Church’s highest honour.

"His dark secrets were ........ .... the Royal Marines who awarded him a green beret – an unprecedented accolade for a civilian .... the universities who handed him honorary degrees or the leading hospitals and institutions which gave him unfettered access...."

Jimmy Savile: A report that reveals 54 years of abuse.


"SERIAL paedophile Jimmy Savile has been linked to the UK’s biggest sex ­scandal.


"A man, now in his 50s, says the telly star and DJ sexually assaulted him at the notorious Bryn Estyn children’s home in North Wales."
 
JIMMY SAVILE IN LINKS TO KIDS' HOME
Reportedly, Bryn Estyn was used by the UK security services as a boy brothel, where VIPs could be filmed and blackmailed.
 
North Wales paedophile ring





Website for this image...

Anonymous writes about Jimmy Savile:

"I was only 12 but Jimmy Savile came and gave us a talk about himself and his work for charity etc.

"He said it was great cover for his real work as a spy.

"He said spies have to have deep cover and England would be part of a grand plan and it was so exciting to be part of this and all of us children must help to bring England and Israel closer together.

"I later told my Mum and she said its just pop speak and did not mean anything, but i wonder now in the light of recent revelations about high level Jews keeping his dirty secrets."



The Daily Kos tells us about the Jimmy Savile cover-up
 

"Increasingly it seems that Savile was a protected man.
 

"One senses that the real question should be the role of the Intelligence/Security services (MI5 / MI6 in UK) and establishment elites in the cover-up...
 

Jimmy Savile, Politicians and Royalty
 

"Savile was for years a regular guest of Margaret Thatcher at her official country house when she was Prime Minister.
 

"Savile was close to Royalty, as well, and a frequent visitor to Buckingham Palace, Kensington Palace and Highgrove (Prince Charles’ estate). Indeed Prince Charles had visited Savile at Savile’s retreat in Glencoe, Scotland...





Savile's inheritance. BBC grooms children for sex on Cbeebies. Tapestry at the tap
 
The Daily Kos tells us more about the Jimmy Savile cover-up:
 

Sir Jimmy Savile, Pedophile - Protected by UK Power Elites
 

"The sad fact is that in the UK and Canada the secret Intelligence/Security Apparatus are known to see part of their role as operating outside the law to illegally protect establishment elites from justice when they do wrong.
 

"BBC Presenters are always vetted by the secret intelligence/security services, and friends of royalty and top politicians are also known to be vetted on a regular basis - Savile was both.
 

"So it is inconceivable that MI5/6 were unaware of his pedophilia since it had been going on for so long - theirs was the role that hid the truth and protected Savile from justice..."
UK Elites Cover-up Pedophilia using MI5/MI6 : http://zersetzen.wikispaces.com
Actor Wilfrid Brambell and John Lennon
For some years there have been allegations about Jimmy Savile, Wilfrid Brambell, and a former top person in the UK government being involved in child sex abuse on the island of jersey.
The mainstream media have mentioned the BBC's Savile and BBC actor Brambell as alleged abusers of children on Jersey.

Savile abuse claims span six decades
 
Pete Saunders, chief executive of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood (Napac), raised the question whether Savile could have been part of a paedophile ring. 
"It's hard to accept that nobody else wasn't in some kind of collusion with him. Who gave him a flat at Stoke Mandeville hospital? Who gave him access to vulnerable children in children's wards?"



 
"CABINET minister Ken Clarke was dramatically dragged into the Jimmy Savile scandal yesterday. It emerged that BBC pervert Savile was “given the keys” to Broadmoor secure hospital around 1988 — when Mr Clarke was Health Secretary." Jimmy Savile was given the keys to Broadmoor under Ken Clarke's watch

The former health secretary Ken Clarke has sought to distance himself from the decision.

Esther Rantzen, founder of Childline, said: "Unfortunately, when I heard rumours about Jimmy Savile some time ago, at no stage did I ever come across a child or witness or an adult survivor who actually told me of abuse by Jimmy Savile."

One woman reportedly warned her about Savile.

Rantzen says that she has no recollection of the conversation.

Stuart Syvret, a former health minister in Jersey who exposed allegations of child abuse there in 2007, said: "Undoubtedly Savile will have known senior police officers, other celebrities, people in the BBC. It's the glue that holds the child abuse cover-up together, that these people protect each other."

He said he "would be profoundly surprised" if there weren't a paedophile ring within the BBC.



Sir Jimmy Savile in Israel in 1975. 


JIMMY SAVILE FIX IT FOR ISRAEL IN 1977?
http://www.jewishtelegraph.com/savile.html (links found at Jimmy Savile Sex Beast Allegations.)
In 1977, Israel’s Prime Minister Menachem Begin had a meeting with Egyptian president Anwar Sadat.

 

This led to 'peace' between the two countries.
Sir Jimmy Savile received a medal from Israel in 1979, for services rendered.

Reportedly, Savile visited Israel in 1975 to advise Israel's President Ephraim Katzir on a matter of security.

 

Reportedly, Savile told the Israeli cabinet that he "was very disappointed: the Israelis had won the Six Day War but they had given back all the land, including the only oil well in the region, and were now paying the Egyptians more for oil than if they had bought it from Saudi Arabia."




Princess Diana with Jimmy Savile.
 

Reportedly, Savile visited Israel a number of times to offer his advice.
A Manchester businessman, Benny Sternberg, revealed that "Savile had been approached to explore the possibility of a meeting between Sadat and Begin because of his friendship with the family of the Egyptian president's wife Jehan."

 

Savile described himself as "the only yok with a Yiddishe kop".




Howard Silverman was one of Sir Jimmy Savile’s closest pals. Website for this image



"Savile claimed during an interview with The Guardian newspaper’s Simon Hattenstone that he told Professor Katzir: 'I’m very disappointed because you’ve all forgotten how to be Jewish and that’s why everyone is taking you to the cleaners … You won the Six Day War, you took all that land, you gave it all back, including the only oil well in the area, and now you’re paying the Egyptians for the oil you already had.'

"Savile also maintained that the president invited him to repeat his words at a Cabinet meeting. 'They asked my opinion about a couple of things, to which I said, ‘Nothing’s impossible’. They did exactly what I suggested and it worked out 100 per cent successful.’”

"The occasion was confirmed partly by Roger Ordish, producer of Jim'll Fix It, who said: 'I know he met the President when we were in Israel in 1975.'


"Sir Jimmy always said he had berated the Israeli Cabinet in 1975 for being too soft after the Six Day War."

http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/57...-my-batmitzvah

Savile's "ten-day visit to Israel in 1975, when he met President Ephraim Katzir and Jerusalem mayor Teddy Kollek, was organised by John Levy of the Friends of Israel Educational Trust...

"One of Savile's eight homes was a flat in the heart of the Leeds Jewish community in Roundhay...



"He was a regular at fundraising dinners at synagogues in Leeds and Manchester..."




Cardinal Keith O'Brien with Jimmy Savile
Jimmy Savile had both a Royal and Papal knighthood (Order of St. Gregory the Great)

He was a Knights Hospitaller (also known as the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St. John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, Order of St. John, Knights of Malta, and Chevaliers of Malta)





"I know from my own unimpeachable sources that Saville was a sick abomination of a human being who not only abused children, but was a necrophiliac, which is defined as an 'obsessive fascination with death and corpse' and an 'attraction to or sexual contact with corpses' - hence his famous 'volunteering' to be a 'porter' at Leeds General Infirmary."

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showt...hlight=saville / Jimmy Savile Sex Beast Allegations.



Sir Jimmy Savile and former prime minister, Gordon Brown

Sir Jimmy Savile told Esquire magazine: "I am the eminence grise: the grey, shadowy figure in the background. The thing about me is I get things done and I work under cover."
Savile says he spent "11 consecutive Christmases ... with the Thatchers."



Speaking of former Prime Minister Thatcher, Savile told Esquire: "I knew the real woman and the real woman was something else. The times I spent up there (Chequers) - Denis, me and her, shoes off in front of the fire."



"He spent an afternoon entertaining the wives of the G7 leaders back in 1991 at John Major's invitation...
"Savile had dinner with ... Admiral Sir Michael Boyce (Chief of the Defence Staff)...
"Dickie Arbiter, who was Prince Charles's press adviser, confirms that Savile was involved in the lives of the Royal Family."

Diana described Savile as a "sort of mentor" to Charles. 



Roger Ordish, Savile's former BBC producer, said: "I know he met the President when we were in Israel in 1975. 



"And he did the same thing at Chequers with the Blairs as he did with the Thatchers."
Savile claimed that was the only existing civilian holder of the coveted Royal Marines Green Beret. 



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-565179/Jim-fixer-Is-Jimmy-Savile-just-fantasist---truth-stranger-fiction.html#ixzz284BODf5K


The late Sir Jimmy Savile with Lady Diana

Was Jimmy Savile being used by the intelligence services?

Reportedly, some BBC producers were aware of Jimmy Savile's behaviour "as far back as the mid 1960s."



Reportedly, the BBC turned a blind eye to Savile's alleged child sex abuse.



"One of the assaults had even been witnessed by the member of a BBC television production team."



Wilfred De'Ath, a former BBC producer, says that, in 1964, he saw Savile in a restaurant with a 12 year-old girl, who had been picked up by Savile at the BBC.
TV-bosses-turn-blind-eye-Savile-Anger-grows-string-age-girls-come-forward-say-star-abused-them
 
Savile with the former BBC personality Esther Rantzen, who is now working for the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Sir Jimmy Savile was knighted by the Queen and 'feted' by the Pope. - Jim-fooled-thinking-saint
 

The BBC is said to have close links to the security services.
The BBC blocked a Newsnight investigation into the Savile's 'predatory behaviour'.

Sources at the BBC say that the Newsnight investigation uncovered evidence that two other celebrities allegedly sexually abused underage girls on its premises in the 1970s.

 

The military carry the coffin at Savile's funeral at Leeds Cathedral.
 

An ITV1 documentary includes a 2009 recording of Savile talking in support of Gary Glitter, who was later jailed for child sex offences in Vietnam.
 

Reportedly, Savile molested girls on a couch in his BBC dressing room, and sometimes he would pin them roughly against the wall in the BBC corridors.
Did TV bosses turn a blind eye to Savile?.


Duncroft School.



Savile was a frequent visitor to the Duncroft School 'for intelligent, emotionally disturbed' girls.



Two Duncroft girls "were repeatedly raped" by Savile. Both girls claim that Savile gave them sexually transmitted diseases.
 

"The revelations follow a year-long investigation by former Surrey police child protection officer Mark Williams-Thomas for an ITV documentary."
 

According to Mr Williams-Thomas, "This was a man who was Mr BBC. He was everywhere, he was iconic and he was incredibly well-connected."




Savile had links to top people. Pall bearers from the Royal Marines carry the coffin of Sir Jimmy. Website for this image


'Anna', a former pupil from Duncroft was invited backstage after a recording of one of savile's BBC shows.



She says Savile looked on while two other BBC stars abused an underage girl in his dressing room and one had sex with her.
 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2210972/Did-TV-bosses-turn-blind-eye-Savile-Anger-grows-string-age-girls-come-forward-say-star-abused-them.html#ixzz281tLKvDm


Lord Lieutenant of Orkney Colonel Macrae and Radio 1 DJ Jimmy Savile, by Phoenix Photography


Allegedly Jimmy Saville supplied kids to top people such as former UK prime minister Ted Heath.




"Sir Jimmy Saville was seen by the witness, victim, taking young boys on board Heath's yacht the morning cloud...
"Saville is known for supplying a number of high profile MP’s with children for them to sexually abuse."

(http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/1603_jersey.shtml/[2011] JERSEY:  Children were loaned to rich paedophile yachtsmen)

CHILD ABUSE 'COVER-UP'; Police call off Sea Cadets ...
Allegedly, UK Prime Minister Edward Heath "would regularly take boys from certain care homes away on his boat for weekends....

"The name 'Mr. Eddy' was well known on Hampstead Heath and the boys home nearby in the seventies."



TV star Jimmy Savile - fond of boys.
On 29 October 2011, a West Yorkshire Police spokesperson said:

'Police were called at 12.10pm today to the discovery of a man's body at a house in Roundhay, Leeds.

'The body of a man in his 80s was found at the property...'

The body was that of Sir Jimmy Savile.

Savile was a regular visitor to Kensington Palace, Buckingham Palace, and Highgrove.

(Jimmy Savile dead: Presenter dies aged 84)


Jimmy Savile
"In the 50s, when Savile was running dancehalls in the north, he earned himself a reputation as a hard man.

"Savile, the most Jewish Catholic you'll ever meet, asks me if I've been to Israel...

"He talks about the dancehall days. 'I wouldn't stand for any nonsense whatsoever. Ever, ever. I never threw anybody out.Tied them up and put them down in the bloody boiler house until I was ready for them'...

"The press has dogged him for years, determined to pin some nastiness on him. Savile says they have failed miserably. Is he talking about the paedophile rumours?"

(In bed with Jimmy The Guardian guardian.co.uk)



Child abuse at a childrens' home in Jersey - "Seems Jimmy Saville, Wilfred Brambles (played the old boy in Steptoe) and at least one ex Tory cabinet minister are implicated.

"Saville has put out a gagging order, he was a regular visitor to the home.

"Very similar to Kincora and other similar scandals where masons conspired with top cops and those in high places to escape justice."

(Masonic child abuse in jersey, Jimmy Saville implicated - Stormfront)

"He ... did have some contacts at morgues around the country and he paid them for access to their, shall we say, clients."

(Jimmy Savile - David Icke's Official Forums)



Savile and cub scouts
"Savile, the star of children’s television favourite Jim’ll Fix It, decided to start proceedings against the Rupert Murdoch paper after a series of articles linked the former Radio One DJ with Jersey children’s home Haut de la Garenne.

"The police are currently investigating the care home after human remains were found at the residence where children were allegedly tortured and sexually abused.

"On 1 March, Savile’s solicitors said, The Sun carried a photograph of the former Top of the Pops presenter allegedly visiting the Jersey home.

"This was followed with a series of articles. One asserted that Savile was unwilling to assist with the police investigation and another that he admitted having visited the home. The Sun also criticised Savile for being unprepared to 'go some way to fixing it for the victims'."

(Jimmy Savile turns to Fox Hayes for action against The Sun News ...)


Sir Jimmy Savile and friends
"In the 1960′s ,The former Radio 1 DJ Alan ‘Fluff’ Freeman owned a large corner shop on the Lea Bridge Rd in London.

"This shop has recently been reported as a place where ‘Fluff’ heldkinky parties ,attended by the likes of confirmed bachelor Sir Jimmy Saville , Jonathen King, the once jailed paedophile broadcaster & former pop star and Brian Epstein, who was at the time the Homosexual manager of the Beatles.

"At these parties , young boys , specially brought over from several childrens homes would be plied with drugs and alcohol.

"However these parties were forced to come to an end when Police chiefs got wind that the MP & Ex Liberal Party leader Jeremy Thorpe was attending them along with several other prominent MP’s...

"Edward Heath, Prime Minister of England from 1970-74... was a frequent visitor to the Haute de la Garenne childrens care home on Jersey."

(WHY THE JUSTICE SYSTEM FAVOURS PEDOPHILES. Before It's News)


Jimmy Savile and friends
In 1988, Jimmy Savile "was named as the head of a new task force charged with turning around Broadmoor, Britain’s most notorious high-security psychiatric hospital, home to Ronnie Kray and Peter Sutcliffe."

(Rolls of bank notes in his shell suit, he wore oddness as a badge)

Ronnie Kray reportedly ran a pedophile ring for top people (THE KRAY TWINS, BOYS, TOP PEOPLE, SEX IN PRISONS)

______________________________

aangirfan: SUPPLIER OF KIDS TO TOP PEOPLE?
2011 Oct] Death of a Showman: Jimmy Saville 1926-2011 by T Stokes
[2011] JERSEY: Children were loaned to rich paedophile yachtsmen

Jan 10, 2013

More of the same by Gunga Dins linked to the CIA.

.
.
.
.
The main challenge and problem for Pakistan and its neighbors continues to be the Punjabi Pakistan military and its penchant for faggoty gay ops inside Pakistan for the USA, and in the vicinity for a few dollars.

The outcomes are never good for Pakistan.

Peter Chamberlain eloquently details the main drama in this theater as it is.....a non Pakistani foreigner from the USA.

Pakistan must disengage completely from gora sahib, without the unnecessary moral crutch of tilting to Wahabi Islamism, and realign with India, and of course China the new superpower that is the mightiest industrial power, trading power and soon to be military power.

Flirting with the USA in silly covert ops is old and very stale, and of course very counter productive for Pakistan, the failed state. 

____________________________________

India/Pakistani Detente’ Went Into the Ground with the drone demise of Mullah Nazir by the CIA

Peter Chamberlin at therearenosunglasses.com

The military-dominated politics pushed by Mr. Saeed are identical to those of  the actual “Taliban,” who were nice enough to provide America with a convenient excuse to wage experimental techno-warfare in Afghanistan (SEE:  Rightwing alliance is revived  ;  Pushing Pakistan’s Buttons–or, Shit Rolls Downhill).  Saeed likes to try to capitalize on the hot-button right-wing politics of Pakistan, attempting to turn his Defense of Pakistan Council into a multi-issue political force.  His recent jumping into the Indian “water wars” issue and his attempt to light an anti-NATO fire on Pakistan’s streets, and now this, looking for a back door for bringing his “Islamists” into Balochistan’s turmoil.  The fact that he has implied that all of the trouble in Baloch Province is India’s fault, the “foreign “meddling,” that Reyman Malik is always whining about, without ever actually naming anyone directly (India, USA and Israel, a.k.a.,  the “Zionist coalition”), is an indicator that he is speaking for the ISI.  

Pakistan had seemed to be getting a handle on the covert war that the Pentagon and the CIA had thrust upon them, before this Nazir killing.  Since then, renewed military action along the Line of Control in Kashmir, and motion of Lashkar i-Taiba ISI puppets like Hafiz Saeed, suggest that Pakistan’s “Plan B” is a regression to its historic focus upon India.  Look for Ilyas Kashmiri to suddenly show-up alive again, leading some new charge against India.  A new Pakistan/India war is exactly what the American agencies have been striving to ignite, no matter what American apologists may say to the contrary.  Look at Syria today to understand American plans for Pakistan and Iran tomorrow.
india-kashmir-pakistan-conflict

[EDITOR's NOTE:  Since penning these lines late last night, news has emerged concerning the ongoing exchange of hostilities at the LoC,  that two of the recently killed Indian Jawans were beheaded, with one of the heads being taken back to Pakistan, in a reprise of the bloody terrorist attack where Ilyas Kashmiri rose to fame in Pakistan and notoriety in India for seizing the head of an Indian colonel and offering it to Musharraf.  I had to point-out that Kashmiri or a new incarnation of him has already shown-up in Jammu and Kashmir.]

Lashkar-e-Taiba is not at all what we have been led to believe.  The ongoing Mumbai trial in New York (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ILYAS KASHMIRI, ET AL), has caused the US Govt. to intervene on behalf of the Pakistani Govt., indirectly helping Lashkar-i-Taiba, due to the 
testimony obtained from a different Chicago trial, that of American/Pakistani double-agent David Headley (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ILYAS KASHMIRI, ET. AL.).   Between the two Mumbai trials, the ISI has been given immunity in US Courts for terrorist attacks upon Americans.  The same blanket immunity actually also helps to cover Hafiz Saeed, who is also named in the criminal complaint, by virtue of a potential verdict of  ”not guilty.”  
LeT has history with the CIA, as well as its current connections to ISI.  


David Headley’s co-conspirator, named in the New York trial is Hafiz Saeed.  Saeed’s pilgrammage to Balochistan stands-out as an ISI ploy to negotiate a sort of  ”peace” in Balochistan, in an effort  to enlist the aid of Talat Bugti to end the war of “disappeared” persons.  This is a “no-starter” ploy to blame all the troubles in Balochistan upon India, in exchange for an end to ISI murder in Balochistan.  Mr. Bugti is unlikely to support Saeed’s gambit without promises of an end to Frontier Corps retribution and murder, since he puts all the blame for nearly all of Balochistan’s violence upon Pakistani “agencies.”   But there is one point of agreement between the LeT operative and the Baloch nationalist Bugti, that the CIA and friends are responsible for controlling the  BLA and BRA.  It is not yet known what has transpired in that Lahore meeting between the Kashmiri activist and the one from Balochistan, but we have Saeed saying that:

“Balochistan should not be made to undergo a military operation.”  

If he can ever be taken at his word, then the Pak Army has softened its stance there, as it  has already shown restraint in its Baloch operations, starting no major military operations in recent memory,  indicating that they too have no desire for open warfare with local separatists and terrorists.  If peace is what they are truly after in Balochistan, then all issues could become negotiable.  The secret wars in Balochistan could end overnight if both sides were suddenly to become reasonable.  

The Army’s attempts to find peace through multiple tribal treaties had been starting to show promise in South Waziristan, after many years of trial and error.  A model program for Quick Impact Projects was being implemented there, after it had been formulated and funded by the United States, to employ a strategy that had been mapped-out to create incentive for peace there, by exchanging aid and development for the renunciation of militancy, or at least for belligerents to holster their guns, just as Mullah Nazir had done against the Army in Wana.  The Army was leading the development program there as a strategic move, using money provided by USAID and UAE investors, to promote peace or dialogue between warring factions by building and opening new thoroughfares between contested areas.  Despite the participation in the program of the Ahmadzai Wazirs, movement continued in this direction in Wana, money kept flowing into the program, with donations nearly doubling in the last year.  It was a blatant attempt to buy-off tribal loyalties by the American side, even though Pakistan was using the aid to bring peace to the Waziristan tribes, the exact opposite of American intent.  The Pentagon planners who came up with the idea expected the bribery to decrease cross-border anti-American hostilities.  In exchange for the government effort, Mullah Nazir had ordered the militant Mehsuds out of South Waziristan.  It was expected that other pro-Pakistan militants like Gul Bahadar in North Waziristan (along with the Haqqani boys) would follow the South Waziristan lead.  America kept the bribery coming but killed Nazir, its primary benefactor, it seemed.  The killing of Nazir was a major boost to the tyranny of Hakeemullah Mehsud.  Expect outlandish terror attacks to return to South Waziristan very shortly.  

With the sabotaging of Pakistani efforts in Waziristan, CIA planners could once again focus their attention upon the further destabilization of Balochistan, in particular its long border with Iran.  We know for certain that Mr. Saeed has some anti-Indian plans in mind when he speaks of calling an “all parties conference on Balochistan.”  With Saeed, his meeting with  Talal Bugti signals a further “Islamization” of Pakistani politics, intended, no doubt as a recruitment drive for new Islamist fighters, to be used when and where the agency-controlled LeT handlers choose to send them.  Bugti must be extra careful of endorsing anything from this devious crowd.  He will not likely associate with any political rally where he expects to hear calls for “Jihad!”  The most that can come out of any Defense of Pakistan Council sponsored all party conference is the providing of a political boost to radical Islamists and Baloch separatists.  What Bugti must decide beforehand, before risking his own neck, is which side will receive the lion’s share and which the beggar’s lot in any deal with Lashkar-i-Taiba and ultimately the spy agencies that are behind them.  Between this ploy and the one now playing-out in Kashmir, India should understand the new reality being handed them by the ISI as retribution for Imperial sabotage.
therearenosunglasses.hotmail.com

Hafiz Saeed meets Talal Bugti, urges solution to Balochistan crisis

dawn
Hafiz Mohammad Saeed
Hafiz Mohammad Saeed. — Photo by Reuters

LAHORE: Jamaatud Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed on Tuesday said the government should take steps to resolve the issues confronting Balochistan on an emergency basis, DawnNews reported.
Speaking to media representatives after meeting with Jamhoori Watan Party (JWP) chief Talal Akbar Bugti in Lahore, the JuD chief said the government no longer had the room to further delay on addressing the issues.

During the meeting, the two discussed Balochistan’s security situation as well as the country’s political situation.

Saeed told reporters that the government should take immediate steps to resolve the issues confronting Balochistan, adding that difficulties would increase in case the province’s issues remain unsolved.

Saeed further said that Balochistan should not be made to undergo a military operation.
He moreover questioned as to who would put a stop to “Indian interference” in the province.
The JuD chief added that his party would host an all parties’ conference on Balochistan.
On the occasion, Bugti said he would not support any artificially installed leadership in Balochistan, adding that an all parties’ conference would soon be called to discuss the province’s issues.

["The emergence of the ”Defense of Pakistan Council” movement has raised suspicions that the group has approval from elements in the powerful military and security establishment, aiming to bolster public support for a hardline position."]

”We demand Pakistani rulers quit the alliance with America,” said Saeed,

”Wake up, countrymen, break the shackles of American slavery.”

”Jihad! Jihad!” the crowd roared.]

Talal advises to form grand alliance

the news pak
 
ISLAMABAD: Jamhoori Watan Party Chief Talal Akbar Bugti has advised to form a grand alliance before general elections, adding that if all the demands of Baloch people were met then he himself will persuade the Baloch leaders residing abroad.

Addressing the ‘Meet The Press’ programme here at Islamabad Press Club, Talal Bugti said that he would not take part in the elections until FC, ISI and MI leave the province.

The JWP chief claimed that FC and secret agencies are involved in smuggling in Pakistan and Afghanistan. He also claimed that Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and Lashkar e Jhangvi in their part are not involved in the insurgency.

Talal said that the current situation of Balochistan is worse than that of West Pakistan in 1971. He said that if the situation in the province remained same then UN or any army of Islamic country should be asked to save Pakistan.

Jan 8, 2013

Bye bye and good riddence USA......eventually.

.
.
.
.
The main priority of the Pentagon/CIA along with the government in Washington in Afghanistan between 2001--2024,  is the harvesting of Opium into heroin and the distribution of the narcotic through extensive criminal networks of the above around the world, including the USA, and the profits laundered in the Jewish banks of New York and London. It is estimated that the heroin peddling yields annually anything between $50-80 billion according to Global research, an alternate news website.

The annual cost of "war" and occupation of Afghanistan to the American tax payer is anything between $100--$150 billion, along with the unnecessary military casualties incurred. Since Pentagon figures are so opaque...with a loose $3 trillion unaccounted for, with no audit...AND Tim Osman's "al-CIA-duh" helpfully destroying the specific part of the Pentagon dealing with Pentagon audits in 9/11 2001 using cruise missiles borrowed from the Pentagon...the true cost to the American taxpayer cannot be accurately measured and reported dutifully to the long suffering American public.

The American public, despite lavish Jewish propaganda with skewered logic for prolonging the war and the FBI, never-the less would like to wind down the war in Afghanistan.

American occupation of Afghanistan has been characterized by overwhelming bad faith. In the 21st century as a pose to the primitive Medieval era, it helps to have some good intentions when occupying a country, in order to establish an American empire; Such as those that America applied in its long term occupation of  Japan for 67 years. The Japanese are shall we say no less a proud warrior race as the noble Afghans, but as yet there is no Japanese Taliban insurgency against minimal America occupation in Okinawa, despite the messy outcomes that occur when the military are posted in civilian areas. However baseball has become a national sport in Japan, and every where American cultural icons dominate the country to a significant degree. Japan is successful under subtle American domination of election fixing, and the "training" of key state institutions.

In Ariana Afghanistan...no such luck.

The CIA/Pentagon have converted the country into one giant Opium plantation.

They run the country using Yakuza figures straight out of Hollywood B-movies.

If that's not bad enough, they tongue in cheek state that they are are in Afghanistan fighting an indefinite war against the Taliban, an organization created by the CIA in 1994. And further that 99% of the annual $100-150 billion cost for the USA/NATO is spent on security....not building up Afghanistan. So a fake war with REAL CASUALTIES ON all sides is undertaken to hide the real motivations and action of the Pentagon/CIA namely the harvesting of Opium.

Not surprisingly Afghanistan is a failed state, and one of the most corrupt, presided over by the audit-less Pentagon/CIA, after 11 years of hostile, negative, cynical, costly occupation.

The Jewish run Soviet Union was brutal in Afghanistan as it conducted its shadow FAKE Cold War against the Jewish run USA between 1948---1991......they killed 1.5 million Afghans using very aggressive warfare. By contrast 11 years of American occupation has resulted in 50,000 deaths possibly. However the intentions of the Soviet Union were much purer in Afghanistan, as they undertook significant modernization projects, despite being at war, and an ever weakening stagnating Soviet economy. But what will the legacy of the USA be when they are finally pushed out of Afghanistan COMPLETELY  2016/2017/2018.............(i) A war torn country (ii) Capital flight (iii) extensive mafia rule, linked to the CIA/Pentagon (iv) The CIA created Taliban as the hero for the day. A medieval organization that is extremely regressive and provides no real hope as it is guided by the ISI for their CIA's masters.



________________________________
Comparing America’s Failure in Afghanistan to the Soviet’s in 1989

John Glaser at antiwar.com

The New Years experience tends to generate perspective and long-term thinking. At least, that’s the case with two unlikely opinionators: The New York Times and the Taliban.
Both the Times and the Taliban have made strong, end of the year historical comparisons between the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, coming at least partially in 2014, and the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1989.
The New York Times:
The young president who ascended to office as a change agent decides to end the costly and unpopular war in Afghanistan. He seeks an exit with honor by pledging long-term financial support to allies in Kabul, while urging reconciliation with the insurgency. But some senior advisers lobby for a deliberately slow withdrawal, and propose leaving thousands of troops behind to train and support Afghan security forces.
This is a nearly exact description of the endgame conundrum facing President Obama as he prepares for a critical visit by Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, planned for early January.
But the account is actually drawn from declassified Soviet archives describing Mikhail S. Gorbachev’s closed-door struggles with his Politburo and army chiefs to end the Kremlin’s intervention in Afghanistan — one that began with a commando raid, coup and modest goals during Christmas week of 1979 but became, after a decade, what Mr. Gorbachev derided as “a bleeding wound.”
Separately, the Taliban released an emailed statement entitled “Quick Glance at 2012″ in which they said “We can unmistakably state that 2012 in Afghanistan for the current occupation was exactly as 1986 was for the former occupation.” 


Reporting on the statement, AFP writes “The year 1986 is widely seen as a turning point in the Soviets’ ten-year presence in Afghanistan, with mujahideen attacks forcing Moscow on the defensive before the military finally left in 1989.”

The comparison is an important one, because in the West, the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan is universally regarded as retreat in the face of defeat. And Americans will have to watch, as 2013 and 2014 come and go, as their political leadership tirelessly claim that the war was worth it, the mission has been accomplished, and the troops are leaving with their heads high.
But it’s not the case. As Afghan President Hamid Karzai said in October, America’s war in Afghanistan “will not be successful.” And the surge Obama ordered in 2009 has been a complete failure by every observable metric. A Pentagon report to Congress last month “found that violence in Afghanistan is higher than it was before the surge of American forces into the country two years ago,”  The New York Times reported.


US troops are leaving in 2014, not because the mission has been accomplished, but precisely because it hasn’t, and it can’t be.

That said, there is one major difference between the US in 2014 and the Soviet Union in 1989: the US is not leaving Afghanistan. During the vice presidential debates, VP Joe Biden said, “We are leaving [Afghanistan]. We are leaving in 2014, period. Period.” But all along, the US has been working behind the scenes with the Kabul government on an agreement that would govern the presence of at least 10,000 US troops well beyond 2014, perhaps until 2024.

Of course a major problem is that so long as any foreign occupation exists in Afghanistan, and so long as any Kabul government is propped up from abroad, the insurgency will remain alive and well. The insurgency has persisted for 11 years despite the efforts of the world’s most advanced military. And all signs tell me they will continue to fight to oust the occupier even after a “withdrawal” (which we now know really only means a smaller occupation).

So the Soviets perhaps were more prepared to face realities in their failed war than Washington. 

The trajectory of America’s failure rests on a much lengthier timeline than the Soviets on the eve of their demise. But it will be a failure, nonetheless.