.
.
.
.
My Aryan brothers……as one Aryan brother….to ….well, fellow Aryan brothers, what you do brings disrespect to “our race”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranians
It is not considered a great achievement in “our culture” to attack the weak, down trodden bottom of the pile poor under class to prove our Aryan manhood, huddled pathetically together in their smelly filthy ghetto’s, subsisting on the fringes of society, in often Third World conditions, forever moaning and cringing, providing entertainment subjects for the Sun and Daily Mail.
Indeed my Aryan brothers I am not sure Aryan men are the most physically brave on this earth……often black men out of Africa seem to exhibit the greatest physical prowess, as in boxing, sports of various types, and according to the “Bell Curve” they have the biggest schnitzels…..........particularly the Dinka in Southern Sudan. Being “ard” and “up for it” does not make one a true Aryan.
Our forefathers in the CENTRAL ASIAN STEPPES, lit fires in the bitter chilled winter nights of our original ancestral lands where we evolved as a distinct race, sang songs of joy, recited poetry, drank wine and opiates….and danced around the fire……..they had beards, and long hair (like hippies….natural protection against the bitter cold weather)They were spiritual, shamanistic, at one with mother earth…constantly traveling, living off the land, which they never claimed was theirs to own.
What you do and how you project yourself goes against the code of the true “Aryan brotherhood.” Shaven heads, beer with racist hateful songs, insecure and angry, in male bonded groups on Saturday nights…..this pseudo-gay behavior that has very little to do with Aryan culture, my dear brothers.
Now let us proceed and address the more substantive issues.
What are the real issues that vexes Perfidious Albion, that shining lone beacon of light unto the world?
1. We must question the official narrative from the mass media that Britain is in dire straits…..often juxtaposed with stark images of the immigrants to get the British tea pot boiling. I remember the news in the 1970’s and the 1980’s…..lines of Aryan brothers unemployed, sad, dejected collecting their social security, and then the pictures of a wog merrily working away at his job. Oh the imagery! One always thought journos were enlightened types from happy balanced middle class backgrounds, with a strong social conscience and sense of communal responsibility—–what a load of bollocks! With the exception of a few, many are racist, cunning racist, educated racists, devious racists, dangerous racists, Goebbels racists,Melanie Philips racist………working in the sensitive mass medium. Often with agenda’s, inviting the most obvious caricature types from the immigrant community…................the ones which look dangerous, menacing, teenage sexually deprived angst ridden, and not clearly happy in Britain.
In America they have a label for these types, “Presstitutes” which means that they serve as organs of the government, collecting and memorizing state “talking points” dished out to them during lobbying sessions…….what % of the journos work for MI-5; who knows?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
But the true Aryan brothers must not believe everything they see and read in the British press, which dish out “one good hate a day”…or the enormously stogy British TV, again with agenda’s……not good agenda’s.
Britain is a paradise, a rich paradise, and to appreciate the country one must leave it and see the rest of the world. Then one can get a better perspective. Then we can see from afar how lucky the British people really are.
In India if one visits the police station to report a crime, they arrest you, and your relatives must come and pay a bribe to release you. In India 850 million live on 25 pence a day; In India 850 million live on just one meal a day, consisting of rice and nothing else……..In Pakistan a jail bird is the President of the country…..In Russia the police are known as “Wolves”……in South Africa.........in Columbia……in Haiti…in DRC.........in Somalia....in Iraq........Britain is a paradise compared to the rest of the world, and do not let the devious agenda filled journos tell you other wise.
Is it so bad to put things in relative terms, and for once not take things so literally, my dear brothers to the far right?
Now the 2nd substantive issue my brothers:
2. The current economic crisis in the UK is the result of the greed of the bankers in "The City" in London. They were greedy, and they speculated on bad financial schemes and some more....and in the end it all went pear shaped for them....and the country,.... translated into loss of jobs and a slowdown of the economy.........the ghetto wogs have very little to do with that, very little. A lot of them don't even operate in the official economy, but subsist in the margins.
And so of course since the bankers own Britain they must be rescued, by the British government, using the taxpayers money; your money, the wog money, and everybody else who does an honest days work .....money...they feel they have an entitlement, and since the government is beholden to them, the government will rescue them at the expense of the rest of the country.
The recent circus of the brothers in Brum provides a very USEFUL DISTRACTION for the foibles and follies of the bankers.........indeed the brothers in Brum are dumb fodder tools of MI-5, which in turn is a tool of...."The City" and London. To honestly fight the noble fight for ones beliefs is one thing, but to be manipulated by rich fat bankers for your entertainment and distraction value is quite another.
The 3rd Substantive issue:
Many British troops have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, and many many more come home physically and psychologically damaged, as a result of their experiences. They become social security basket cases, or simply social outcasts living with homeless people, forgotten by everybody, including the state......and the state is happy to forget them.
Israel has historical linkages with Iraq going back many years, perhaps 3,000 years. Ancient Assyrians invaded Israel, defeated them and took them as slaves to ancient Iraq. They were eventually freed, and able to return to Israel when Cyrus the Great invaded the area and liberated them circa 538 BC. But psychologically Israelis, a race which looks as much back back into history as much as they look forward have a "thing" about Iraq, which you my true Aryan brothers will never be able to comprehend unless you are one of them, living in Israel.
Then there is the issue of Saddam's Iraq, which the Israelis attacked in 1981 against their nuclear installation; the horrifying fact that Saddam had gassed his own people at Halabja in 1988.........and his other military programs....the supergun program.....his missile programs........his chemical/biological programs.....his nuclear program........and a standing military of 1.1 million men in peacetime (1990) 25% of GDP on defense, 6,000 tanks, 4,000 artillery, 600 jet fighters..................made the Israelis very nervous about Saddam, and they angled to get America, and the UK into war against that country via the stooge of Kuwait.
Saddam was never quite sure who his father was, and he was raised by one of his uncles, and a Kuwaiti minister well acquainted with these facts and prodding from the correct sources raised the issue of his illegitimacy in undiplomatic ways guaranteed to arouse his ire, during key negotiations between Iraq and Kuwait. The negotiations between Kuwait and Iraq in 1990 were about canceling Iraq's debts; Saudi had canceled ALL Iraq's debts, but the Kuwaitis insisted that Iraq repay all the money with interest that they had given Iraq during the Iran/Iraq war......the Iraqi position was that Iraq had fought a pan-Arab war against the Persian hoards, and that if the mullah's of Iran had won then many of the Sunni Gulf monarchies would have been swept away.
Additionally there were disputes about the correct boundary between Iraq and Kuwait...........the boundary between Iraq and Kuwait has changed a thousand times......Kuwait is an artificial creation of the British as a petrol station for the British navy......disputes about the correct boundary of the two countries came and went, blowing hot and cold depending on the political climate in Iraq..........The political climate in Iraq by 1990 was hot; they had fought an 8 year war against Iran; allegations the Kuwaitis were extracting secretly crude oil from Iraqi territory near the Kuwait/Iraq border........with undiplomatic behavior from Kuwaiti ministers added to the negative situation between the two countries. Finally in a meeting with the American Ambassador to Iraq, Ms Gillespie, Saddam received confirmation, unofficially that America would not intervene in any quarrels between Iraq and Kuwait...............and then he invaded Kuwait.......and into a trap.
Saddam is not a nice chap, but you need to understand the issue and where British interests lie's in relation to that theater. Saddam's military was smashed in the 1991 1st Gulf war, with 30% of his forces remaining. Between 1991--2003, Iraq was under stringent sanctions, and as a result of this sanction about 1 million Iraqis perished for lack of food and medicine, mainly children.
But Israel which played a critical role behind the scenes in the 1st Gulf war wanted full scale occupation of the country. In addition within that overall context Likud ideologist of the Far Israeli Right penned a document for the then PM Benjamin Netanyahu, called "A Clean Break" (1996)....which advocated using American military might to aggressively expand the interests of Israel around the hinterland of Israel........against Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, perhaps Egypt and Iran later. This document then was repackaged four years later under a new title, "The Project for an New American century" (2000)......which like the policy document four years earlier also called for an aggressive military policy, but this time packaged as Pax Americana policy................penned/signed by the same people who wrote the "Clean Break" document....with the additional names of a few Israeli Firsters from the USA so as not to make it too obvious. These signatories to the PNAC document then joined the Bush administration, as key advisers in the Pentagon and Dick Chenney's office.......9/11 took place organized by the Israelis and Dick Cheney........and the rest as they say is history.
The Invasion of Iraq by America in 2003 was always Israel's goal........going on for years. Saddam posed no threat to the UK, or USA or Israel.......Saddam by 2003 was a spent force seeking Asylum in the UAE, with guarantees..................But Israel wanted its pound of flesh, and so the invasion.
The invasion of Iraq brought NO benefits for Britain except for the privilege of looking like Bush's poodle and stooge, no mean feat.......................there are no political benefits for Britain in Iraq, and there are no economic benefits for Britain in Iraq, as most of the contracts go to American companies. Normally when Britain commits to war the reasons for war are spelled out openly and honestly by the PM in public addresses and in Parliament............this is a tradition.....war for Britain is a solemn, sober and serious occasion................Britain has been in many wars for the last 1000 years..........But this government lied, and manipulated facts and other such devious things to get Britain into this war......WHY?
Most British people are not happy that Britain is fighting in Iraq, and of course naturally a lot of the immigrants are not happy about Britain killing poor people in Third World countries, a lot of whom look like them in some respects....this is only natural.....the real issue is not where their sympathy lies.............expressed overtly or covertly, what they feel or say does not matter; they weren't brought into Britain so as to get their opinion on sensitive state issues; they have little or no organised political power; Its a diversion.......the real issue which you should be concerned about and therefore asking is why Britain fighting wars for other countries.......namely Israel. To be sure Lord Levi as Middle East adviser might be biased given his background, or Sir David Manningham........but at the end of the day there must surely be a greater number of people who see the folly of such situation
With Afghanistan it is about Heroin....................see the above blog about you again.
Now the 4th substantive issue my dear Aryan brothers:
My Aryan brothers let me address the vexed issue of aliens in our midst.
Britain is NOT a multi-cultural society, though there is a pretense and official narrative that it is. The aliens and non-European population constitute about 6-7% of the population, huddled together in the inner city areas of the big cities which inadvertently gives the impression that they are “every where” when the majority commute in from the lush green white suburbs. In addition in especially the summer, many wogs migrate from their hot countries to the moderate climes of our shores for R&R which falsely amplifies this incorrect impression, particularly in London. By 2036, when the British population reaches about 68 million depending on a number of intervening variables, the aliens population will still be at most 8-9% of the population huddled together in their stinking inner city masses.
Or to put it in another way Britain by 2050 will still be an over whelming white and Christian country/society. The powers that be who run Britain will not allow it to become a true multi-racial society. If the powers that be have let in a certain % of small insignificant non-white aliens into British society it is usually for certain good reasons, that you or I are not privy to. It most certainly is not the case that these aliens have outwitted the state of the art British police state and slipped in through the Channel Tunnel, or rowed through the North Sea quietly into the British shores undetected…………..The British elite have decided to let them in from the 1950’s through a variety of policies, and if you genuinely apprehend fear from their very modest presence in our shores then you must correctly and properly address your concerns to the RELEVANT authorities and elite groups in UK society…..the Rothschild and Bankers of “The City” who run the UK.
That is the proper manly Aryan thing to do.
Indeed my dear Aryan brothers, targeting these wogs publicly is of little use accept perhaps in satisfying possible pseudo-gay urges which exist under the cover of projecting aggressive working class male “angst” and “power”in an S & M way….”you hit me I hit you, you hit me I hit you, you hit me I hit you, you hit me I hit you ,you hit me I hit you, you hit me I hit you ,you hit me I hit you, you hit me I hit you ,you hit me I hit you, you hit me I hit you ,you hit me I hit you, you hit me I hit you ” ……..”all right sunshine, was that good for you?”.
…………..then there are deep dangerous consequences of agitating against wogs where they apprehend fear and stay home, which I must bring to your attention my dear brethren. In detailed research it has been proven that when people apprehend fear…..they go on extensive bonking sessions…..bonking, bonking and more bonking. In relation to Israel when they impose curfews in the Gaza concentration camp and West bank concentration camp the Palestinian wogs go on extensive bonking sessions, and bonking and bonking, and more bonking….as a result these “insects” start breeding like rabbits, such that the Palestinians will out number the Israeli population in the future…….with the Israeli middle class skilled force looking to migrate to the EU or California. In India they are trying to address the problem of over population (soon to have the largest population in the world) ……by providing free television and electrification of all villages, so that the Indian villagers don’t go on extensive bonking sessions, going to bed early, after 6/7 where the natural light fades.
You my Aryan brother were most probably not good students at school, but most likely posed as the clown of the class, teasing the teachers, acting all smart, with few qualifications or skills to show for, and any redeeming worth which might make you employable and viable. What is your own true worth to society beyond drinking beer, and picking fights with rival gangs and drawing on social security? What have you done to deserve special entitlements within the British state?…….but you say to me you are British, white, and born in the country and that is enough.
But in the true sense the immigrant does not infringe on your turf, or take your social security, or your special council house….as invariably he tends to live in the worst houses, which you would never consider living in. He works in restaurants between 5pm—4am in the morning; works in hospitals for 12/14 hours sweeping and cleaning; works on the buses and trains which are jobs you would never apply for; works in food processing factories for little or no pay…….and so forth which you would never dream of doing, or is simply self employed in HIS restaurant or shop working 7 days a week and 15/16 hours a day…..which again you would never consider doing….in short the immigrant rarely takes “your” job and prospective income.
No self respecting true Aryan brother would be seen doing these types of coolie occupations. The coolie/wog fills a certain demand in the market, that is all …demand and supply.
You might opportunistically say you would do these types of job, but I really wonder whether you really would/physically could. The great boon about the immigrant is that he works harder than you for less pay, and in the cold logic of capitalism the immigrant is a boon/asset for a variety of reasons for British society, specifically in certain sectors.
As to integration, whats the hurry……………it will take a while. The Jews took hundreds of years when Oliver Cromwell unofficially let them into Britain again after the English Civil war. The Jews based in Holland had funded his war machine and the round heads (skin heads) against the cavaliers, after being expelled 350 years earlier around circa 1300. And they still live in their ghetto’s Golda’s Green, and still in many respects do not feel British…………powerful Jews in the state structure Lord Levi, Sir David Manningham et al are not partial to following policies which ultimately favor Israel’s interests over that of the true interests of the UK (Iraq/Afghanistan).
We must temper our expectations as to what extent, and degree the wog can truly integrate into British society after they migrate from their Third World villages straight into the sophisticated atmosphere of a modern First World city life.........how quickly the process of integration takes place must be realistic......the process will take generations.
In relative terms and in the true sense, Britain is not a multi-cultural society though it is certainly fashionable to talk up the area for a variety of reasons. In Germany, by contrast, the Auslander population is 17% and by 2036, the ethnic German population will come down to 56 million from 71 million, whilst the Auslander population will be 30 million, approaching 40%…….and there after if the trend continues into 2060, Germans will become minorities in their own countries; I haven’t heard of ethnic based mass riots in Germany yet against Auslanders very recently. The Bundestaat Polzei handle the area quite firmly.
France’s ethnic population is around 14% I believe depending on whose statistics you take. The French are known for their revolting behavior and tendencies….French farmers, students from 1968, left wing groups and so forth; don’t require a lot of provocation………then it is only natural for Francophone immigrants to ape this national characteristic, which they did in 2005. But alternative research would suggest that that sad episode was more the handiwork of the ambitious interior minister under Chirac, Nicolas Sarkozy, who subsequently went on to become President on a right wing immigrant backlash ticket which he had carefully crafted………..powerful water hoses targeted on the immigrant ghettos in Paris alongside provocative police action, as in clearly provocative police action designed to exact vengeful woggish responses. The water hoses are crude metaphor meaning, he will as President cleanse the estates of the immigrant filth…which he never did. Since then allegations he is a MOSSAD agent, by Le Figaro and under police investigations. He has also introduced Holocaust studies into the French curricula.
Is someone trying to crudely do David Cameron's party a favor in the UK 18 points ahead already, and does he welcome such assistance?
In the USA the non-European element of the population is approaching 34%…..the USA is a true multi-ethnic nation. It has a black president, attorney general, a former head of the armed forces who was black, a former black foreign secretary………and so forth…….supreme court judge in addition…………media presence, Bill Cosby,………….and so forth in the INNER SANCTUMS of the state……………which is unimaginable in the UK, and will not happen, now or in the foreseeable future in “multiracial Britain” with its 6-7% non-white ethnic population.
The little shits in Al-magerine and Headbuttterriers, are like YOU “controlled opposition” providing PUNCH and Judy theater to titillate the audience controlled and propagated by………………….the security services; Larger than life, OTT characters designed to apprehend revulsion from any decent human being….captain hook hands, one eye, contorted abnormal angry faces……………….. Omer Shaikh, and the 7/7 members all worked for them……………….once in a while in this PUNCH and Judy theater they are “brought out” to entertain, in highly provocative manner, and then it is your turn, and then them, then you, highlighted in unhelpful ways by the state media circus…….the pattern is clear, for those of us who wish to focus on the area. Funny enough my Aryan brothers, whilst many of us languish in unemployment or subsist on the margins of society, angry and fretful, a lot of these fundie shits have great jobs in high street firms and other such respectable establishments, openly feted by the media as standard bearer norms and leaders of the ethnic community……….where as within the 2 million Muslim community there are great seas of secular articulate individuals, fully integrated in British society, who aren’t caricatures of the shitty embarrassing above.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fakealqaeda.html
so my Aryan brothers we must NOT become “useful idiots” of the Bankers and their agenda’s of baiting & diversion…..the immigrants are the least of Britain’s true overall problems…you do a disservice to the dignity of the "Aryan nation" and to what are the true issues which require serious addressing, by you, me and the rest of British society.
http://mostaqueali.blogspot.com/2008/04/more-crypto-jews-in-america.html
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=121
http://judicial-inc.biz/Wolfgang_Hawke_neo_nazi.htm
http://judicial-inc.biz/8.1,another_kosher_nazi.htm
http://judicial-inc.biz/Bill_White.htm
Aug 13, 2009
Jul 20, 2009
Zardari Bhai
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. When you've got foreign handlers installing you into power in Pakistan, rigging the elections through the ISI in February 2008, and low voter turnout, and sympathy for the wife. Never mind the fact that your bibi's party's does not like you, never did, and the nation never really liked you. How could they? What redeeming features do you have?
But then what worries can you have? Indeed you smile ear to ear at every opportunity, reassured by their $billions, 10% for you or maybe 20% now.
Fuck Pakistan, fuck the inflation. Fuck the rising food prices. Fuck the power outages. Fuck the meaningless attacks against the historic and noble Pashtuns, using Pakistani bases....fuck all else in Pakistan. You are a puppet, a bought puppet of them............so where is the problem? You have safe houses in London and the Gulf which you can run to should the people rebel against you, and $billions stashed away in the usual places. They who installed you into power reassures you that you are OK; all is well with you in power. Oh people must respect you? You are the President after all "elected" by the people? And so I see.
_____________________________________________
Zardari Jokes.
Robber: Give me all your money! Zardari: Don't you know who I am? I am Asif Ali Zardari! Robber: Okay. Give me all my money! (TOI)
mostaqueali.blogspot.com/2009/03/zardari.html
.
.
.
.
.
.
. When you've got foreign handlers installing you into power in Pakistan, rigging the elections through the ISI in February 2008, and low voter turnout, and sympathy for the wife. Never mind the fact that your bibi's party's does not like you, never did, and the nation never really liked you. How could they? What redeeming features do you have?
But then what worries can you have? Indeed you smile ear to ear at every opportunity, reassured by their $billions, 10% for you or maybe 20% now.
Fuck Pakistan, fuck the inflation. Fuck the rising food prices. Fuck the power outages. Fuck the meaningless attacks against the historic and noble Pashtuns, using Pakistani bases....fuck all else in Pakistan. You are a puppet, a bought puppet of them............so where is the problem? You have safe houses in London and the Gulf which you can run to should the people rebel against you, and $billions stashed away in the usual places. They who installed you into power reassures you that you are OK; all is well with you in power. Oh people must respect you? You are the President after all "elected" by the people? And so I see.
_____________________________________________
Zardari Jokes.
Robber: Give me all your money! Zardari: Don't you know who I am? I am Asif Ali Zardari! Robber: Okay. Give me all my money! (TOI)
To commemorate the ascension from jail bird to the Presidency, Pakistan Post has officially launched a new Rs. 100 stamp. People of Pakistan are confused which side on the stamp to spit on!!!!
mostaqueali.blogspot.com/
Jul 13, 2009
Sacred numbers, Qui Ja boards and private soothsayers.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
In the Middle Ages if you had enough charisma and some basic fighting skills, but you did not belong to a host society, then no problem if the ambition and will to lead was there, not an issue in an age where one was either a Christian, Muslim or some other religion. The concept of statehood had not fully evolved, and therefore for most travelers it was not impossible for usurpers from the outside to takeover another nation which by birth and upbringing was not naturally theirs.
There are so many examples in Europe where this happened, and in other parts of the world.....and out of sheer interest you can study these instances of such occurrences from the pages of history from the past, long ago.
Since the evolution of the concept of the modern state such things are near impossible save a very few places and America. Our identity is defined by first and foremost by where we are bought up and born, the schools we attend, and our first language of communication. Despite the best advancing efforts of globalization, where the significance of the state is allegedly waning, the modern concept of the state, which defines who we are and where we are from still remains true, generally.
Or to put it in a more obvious, clear relevant way a person suddenly cannot become Iranian, Indian, or Russian if that person, as stated clearly above, was not bought up and originally born in that society first. Not possible. And if you are not from those societies originally then you cannot become leaders in those societies, even if you did decide to join a mainstream party in one of those countries, because you will always be considered an "outsider" by the locals given the modern strongly held concept of nationalism....................................just won't happen! You can dream as much as you like, with your silly little costumes of faux Cyrus, turn entire countries upside down, and this and that, but the absolute reality is it won't happen, ever.
But I understand, or at least I understand that often as humans we judge others, and see others through our own perceptions, habits, prejudices and thoughts without realizing it. For a certain international community with no fixed allegiance to any country, save their own where one can be born British, become a naturalized Australian and then finish this off as an important official in an American administration. ........................................easy, no problem.
And for this international community the flavor of the month varies according to their whims. At one time they can be ardent supporters of Imperial Japan, funding its war against Russia ($200 million 1904). In another time aggressive supporters of the Soviet Union building up its strategic industry in the critical years of the 1920's and 1930's (interesting history, do the research)..............or Nazi Germany, helping the Fascist Party ascend to power from the 1920's..............................or.........................and so on and so on.
In their "International world" there are no countries merely pawns and tools which are used for their agenda's gauged from their sacred numbers, Qui Ja boards and private soothsayers.....with a little bit of Human whim thrown into it all. In their International world, a family member can be head of German intelligence at one time right through the war shepherding the Kaiser, whilst another member runs the American federal reserve, printing the cash for the war against.............Germany............And that same money being used to buy materials for the German war effort through neutral Holland, and Sweden. Bizarre, or what?
No not bizarre if seen through the prism of their peculiar logic and interests, gleaned from their sacred numbers, Qui Ja boards, private soothsayers and very often their mood and whims for the day.
But for the rest of us who do not belong to this international community, we are who we are, where we are brought up and born, that is all. We do not need sacred numbers, Qui Ja boards or private soothsayers to tell us this, but the application of simple common sense.
.
.
.
..
.
.
In the Middle Ages if you had enough charisma and some basic fighting skills, but you did not belong to a host society, then no problem if the ambition and will to lead was there, not an issue in an age where one was either a Christian, Muslim or some other religion. The concept of statehood had not fully evolved, and therefore for most travelers it was not impossible for usurpers from the outside to takeover another nation which by birth and upbringing was not naturally theirs.
There are so many examples in Europe where this happened, and in other parts of the world.....and out of sheer interest you can study these instances of such occurrences from the pages of history from the past, long ago.
Since the evolution of the concept of the modern state such things are near impossible save a very few places and America. Our identity is defined by first and foremost by where we are bought up and born, the schools we attend, and our first language of communication. Despite the best advancing efforts of globalization, where the significance of the state is allegedly waning, the modern concept of the state, which defines who we are and where we are from still remains true, generally.
Or to put it in a more obvious, clear relevant way a person suddenly cannot become Iranian, Indian, or Russian if that person, as stated clearly above, was not bought up and originally born in that society first. Not possible. And if you are not from those societies originally then you cannot become leaders in those societies, even if you did decide to join a mainstream party in one of those countries, because you will always be considered an "outsider" by the locals given the modern strongly held concept of nationalism....................................just won't happen! You can dream as much as you like, with your silly little costumes of faux Cyrus, turn entire countries upside down, and this and that, but the absolute reality is it won't happen, ever.
But I understand, or at least I understand that often as humans we judge others, and see others through our own perceptions, habits, prejudices and thoughts without realizing it. For a certain international community with no fixed allegiance to any country, save their own where one can be born British, become a naturalized Australian and then finish this off as an important official in an American administration. ........................................easy, no problem.
And for this international community the flavor of the month varies according to their whims. At one time they can be ardent supporters of Imperial Japan, funding its war against Russia ($200 million 1904). In another time aggressive supporters of the Soviet Union building up its strategic industry in the critical years of the 1920's and 1930's (interesting history, do the research)..............or Nazi Germany, helping the Fascist Party ascend to power from the 1920's..............................or.........................and so on and so on.
In their "International world" there are no countries merely pawns and tools which are used for their agenda's gauged from their sacred numbers, Qui Ja boards and private soothsayers.....with a little bit of Human whim thrown into it all. In their International world, a family member can be head of German intelligence at one time right through the war shepherding the Kaiser, whilst another member runs the American federal reserve, printing the cash for the war against.............Germany............And that same money being used to buy materials for the German war effort through neutral Holland, and Sweden. Bizarre, or what?
No not bizarre if seen through the prism of their peculiar logic and interests, gleaned from their sacred numbers, Qui Ja boards, private soothsayers and very often their mood and whims for the day.
But for the rest of us who do not belong to this international community, we are who we are, where we are brought up and born, that is all. We do not need sacred numbers, Qui Ja boards or private soothsayers to tell us this, but the application of simple common sense.
Jul 12, 2009
The BJP in the post election crisis.
.
.
.
.
I wanted Congress to win but not with that kind of a margin of victory. It makes them complacent and lazy, as if they weren't all ready.
Its the right party for India, because its amorphous, appealing to all sentiments to a greater or lessor degree, accommodating, corrupt, a do nothing party, fat and bloaty, promises more than it delivers, no clear mission or objectives, but a mishmash of sloganeering and statements .......... otherwise a typical status quo Indian misgoverning party that delivers a certain degree of reassurance and therefore appropriate for the diverse Indian society.
I personally thought the April-May 2009 elections were rigged, in favor of the Congress Party, but that's another story. There are numerous fringe sources of how elections are bought in India if you want to follow up on that. But first you must over come the bias that India is not a pure democracy. Indeed the idea that most nations are pure democracies.
So on to the BJP.
A healthy democracy requires a strong opposition. Knit picking and attacking the ruling party. Congress can't, won't win the next election in 2014, but the BJP can if it gears itself up and gets it act together within the next five years. The BJP is less corrupt compared to the Congress Party (or so I like to think), and I tend to think it is administratively more effective, when in power. Unlike Congress it tends to be more focused, and follows through on its programs. It is a party which is not ashamed of being Indian, and most of its leadership aren't foreign educated products with alien ideas implanted into the Indian political system (Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi..........) Finally its leaders are democratically elected by the party; its not a kleptocracy dynasty structured party where the heirs are anointed due to their family lineage. (Congress Party)
Lord Macaulay had stated "We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and millions whom we govern-a class of persons Indian in blood and color, but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals and in intellect."--------Through the Congress Party, and its Dynastic politics neo-colonialism rules. India in order to become a proper self respecting power needs to detach from that, obviously.
So thats the pleasing part about the BJP.
The bad part, well rather obvious and I guess the reason why the under rated common Indian voters chose not to vote for them. You can't eat national flags, or patriotic sloganeering...............indeed such things are rather irrelevant to a dirt poor farmer in say Madhya Pradesh, burdened by debt, or a city slum dweller without real wage earning work. The Indian Middle class, and lower middle class I suppose will "buy" the flag waving and sloganeering for a while; their basic needs have been met....but even here, the core of BJP voters...the same slogans and same message heaved out of the BJP shed may not appeal to the same extent as they did before.
Not that I am saying Indian elections are about issues, with the common voter reading every word of the party manifesto's....but the general blurry gist has to meld with the overall national sentiment, otherwise...NO.
Varun, adolescent Varun, "we Hindus aren't soft touches" Varun, I'm really looking for a fight Varun, Varun hero of the BJP, the new generation vanguard, Ram temple, Ram temple, and some more Ram Temple, Varun, and Varun, and some more Varun, Bring back black money from Switzerland, Varun, Ram Temple, Hai Ram, ...............all packaged under a 81 year old geriatric leader was never going any where, with a bit of election fixing.
Quite simply for the BJP's sake, for the country's sake, the party has to change before it disappears into oblivion and irrelevancy in the Indian political scene, back to its 2 member seats of the 1980's a mere two decades ago..........................what a shame that would be. To be sure I was never happy about the BJP's communalism, how could I be? The problems of India aren't encapsulated by 160 million Muslims, or Pakistan, or anybody else. The fundamental problems of India, which require addressing sooner or later derive from the flaws of Indian society generally.
It is sheer intellectual laziness to suggest that somehow all the myriad of complex national problems within India are enshrined in a narrow platform of "the Muslims".
The problems/challenges of India are problems/challenges many Third World societies face, and the more successful, intelligent, thoughtful, organized Third World societies are diligently working with their people to solve such national problems----NOT bashing a bottom of the basket minority, and creating the false illusion that that will somehow ultimately solve ALL the countries problems eventually.
No true Indian leader should suggest or hint in that direction, by words, gestures or deeds. Otherwise you are doing a disservice to the nation by playing the misleading pied piper taking the gullible down the wrong alley, into the wrong solutions.
The challenges:
1. Terrorism......NE, Maoist and Pakistan backed.
2. Religious Intolerance/BJP.
3. Water Shortage/non monsoon season especially
4. Unequal economic development....poor economic planning. 840 million with minimal income surviving on 20 rupees a day. 55 billionaires.
5. Corruption.
6. Capital flight-----$1.5 trillion to $3 trillion.
7. Devalued Currency.
8. Unemployment.....hiring system. Colonial era/Socialist era employment laws.
9. Low Education.investment......poor quality education....poor quality teachers....poor quality students.........loss of the best to foreign countries. Lack of investment into research...R&D.
10.Weak Foreign Policy.........inconsistent foreign policy....the failure of SAARC, and relations with neighbors especially Pakistan. Aspires to be the regional power, is the regional power but no clear leadership.
11. Poorly performing agricultural sector./farmer debts/low investment and innovation.
12. RAW misadventures.
13..............Failed state characteristics/wikipedia/duplicate.
14. Foreign interference...USA/UK.........behind the scenes through the post-colonial elite.
15. Rapid population growth-----------largest population soon--2030?...........Unfortunately some of the big players and policy makers in India, and so called touted experts keep repeating that a continued population growth along the present trajectory is somehow good for India's future providing a youthful future generation who will increase productivity and demand for the future..........misses the fundamental point that any nation with X amount of resources, and Y level of effective governance can only deliver Z amount of goods and services which satisfy the overall population. My contention is, and I say this most emphatically that given the experience of the last 60 years it is highly unlikely that the "Indian state" will be able to satisfy even the basic needs of most of its people..............................there WILL still be a lot of poor people in India by 2030, never mind any additional new population (500 million more ????), and therefore logically India should very seriously with the zeal of Indira Gandhi think about containing the population growth meaningfully, comprehensively and quickly...............otherwise the overpopulation of India will create failed state characteristics such as those in Bangladesh (no real threat to anyone except as a liability to itself...........300 million by 2050)........and Pakistan about 400 million by 2050, a failed state slowly sliding into anarchy and war, especially in its Western parts.
16. Poor governance.....political parties/bureaucracy/poor leadership.
17. Poor environmental policies/ enforcement and awareness by public--state and national.
18. Post colonial elite...which has no fealty to India.......exemplified by capital flight.
19. Poor infrastructure.
20. Small industrial base.............28% of GDP...low investment in this sector.
21. Weak financial system.
22. Indian bureaucracy...............red tape.
23. Backward society and the inherent problems of any backward society, culturally and psychologically........religious obscurantism and fatalism...........Problems of society explained away as Karmic etc.
24. Indian colonial era police......corruption and criminality.
25. Cultural stagnation....crass, trash Western copy Bollywood/Hindi movies etc.
26. Social harmony and value......soaring crime rates etc....standard social norms.
27. Inconsistent defense policy---low defense expenditure; dreams of a great power mixed up with the true needs of India's defense.
28. Legal system, legal codes, and justice system over burdened, irrelevant and unIndian....does not meet the needs of the ordinary Indian.
29. Poor sanitary and health standards generally.
30. Poor nutrition producing a vast pool of low quality under performing generations....for the future....when did India last win a gold medal in the previous Olympics?
The national failures above are the failings of the Congress Party which has more or less ruled India for the last 62 years approaching, nobody else.
Obviously the BJP can't go into the next elections with geriatric Advani at 86, OBVIOUSLY NOT. The party needs to move on, and present a fresh face and some more new messages. Preferably new messages which are more in line with the national sentiment, and the overall complex Indian society. North all the way to Chennai, from the West all the way East to Arunchal Pradesh.
Arun Jaitley seems intelligent, cosmopolitan and most importantly the right age (56). He should be chosen as the next head of the BJP into the next elections, and Advani should be moved out and retired writing his memoirs and biography.
Some secretly want Modi to be the next head of the BJP but the problem with Modi is that he is fundamentally a divisive character who will further divide India. Yes, Yes, Yes Mussolini and Hitler created jobs, made pretty young men in uniform march down the street, instilled a sense of national pride and discipline, falsely, .................and made sure the trains ran on time.....and all that, but in the process they also further destroyed MORE than they ever created, which had a lasting good effect. Modi is a good state minister, if you like conceded in a gangsterism way, but only a good state minister.......not a national leader.
The BJP should sort itself out quickly.
.
.
.
I wanted Congress to win but not with that kind of a margin of victory. It makes them complacent and lazy, as if they weren't all ready.
Its the right party for India, because its amorphous, appealing to all sentiments to a greater or lessor degree, accommodating, corrupt, a do nothing party, fat and bloaty, promises more than it delivers, no clear mission or objectives, but a mishmash of sloganeering and statements .......... otherwise a typical status quo Indian misgoverning party that delivers a certain degree of reassurance and therefore appropriate for the diverse Indian society.
I personally thought the April-May 2009 elections were rigged, in favor of the Congress Party, but that's another story. There are numerous fringe sources of how elections are bought in India if you want to follow up on that. But first you must over come the bias that India is not a pure democracy. Indeed the idea that most nations are pure democracies.
So on to the BJP.
A healthy democracy requires a strong opposition. Knit picking and attacking the ruling party. Congress can't, won't win the next election in 2014, but the BJP can if it gears itself up and gets it act together within the next five years. The BJP is less corrupt compared to the Congress Party (or so I like to think), and I tend to think it is administratively more effective, when in power. Unlike Congress it tends to be more focused, and follows through on its programs. It is a party which is not ashamed of being Indian, and most of its leadership aren't foreign educated products with alien ideas implanted into the Indian political system (Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi..........) Finally its leaders are democratically elected by the party; its not a kleptocracy dynasty structured party where the heirs are anointed due to their family lineage. (Congress Party)
Lord Macaulay had stated "We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and millions whom we govern-a class of persons Indian in blood and color, but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals and in intellect."--------Through the Congress Party, and its Dynastic politics neo-colonialism rules. India in order to become a proper self respecting power needs to detach from that, obviously.
So thats the pleasing part about the BJP.
The bad part, well rather obvious and I guess the reason why the under rated common Indian voters chose not to vote for them. You can't eat national flags, or patriotic sloganeering...............indeed such things are rather irrelevant to a dirt poor farmer in say Madhya Pradesh, burdened by debt, or a city slum dweller without real wage earning work. The Indian Middle class, and lower middle class I suppose will "buy" the flag waving and sloganeering for a while; their basic needs have been met....but even here, the core of BJP voters...the same slogans and same message heaved out of the BJP shed may not appeal to the same extent as they did before.
Not that I am saying Indian elections are about issues, with the common voter reading every word of the party manifesto's....but the general blurry gist has to meld with the overall national sentiment, otherwise...NO.
Varun, adolescent Varun, "we Hindus aren't soft touches" Varun, I'm really looking for a fight Varun, Varun hero of the BJP, the new generation vanguard, Ram temple, Ram temple, and some more Ram Temple, Varun, and Varun, and some more Varun, Bring back black money from Switzerland, Varun, Ram Temple, Hai Ram, ...............all packaged under a 81 year old geriatric leader was never going any where, with a bit of election fixing.
Quite simply for the BJP's sake, for the country's sake, the party has to change before it disappears into oblivion and irrelevancy in the Indian political scene, back to its 2 member seats of the 1980's a mere two decades ago..........................what a shame that would be. To be sure I was never happy about the BJP's communalism, how could I be? The problems of India aren't encapsulated by 160 million Muslims, or Pakistan, or anybody else. The fundamental problems of India, which require addressing sooner or later derive from the flaws of Indian society generally.
It is sheer intellectual laziness to suggest that somehow all the myriad of complex national problems within India are enshrined in a narrow platform of "the Muslims".
The problems/challenges of India are problems/challenges many Third World societies face, and the more successful, intelligent, thoughtful, organized Third World societies are diligently working with their people to solve such national problems----NOT bashing a bottom of the basket minority, and creating the false illusion that that will somehow ultimately solve ALL the countries problems eventually.
No true Indian leader should suggest or hint in that direction, by words, gestures or deeds. Otherwise you are doing a disservice to the nation by playing the misleading pied piper taking the gullible down the wrong alley, into the wrong solutions.
The challenges:
1. Terrorism......NE, Maoist and Pakistan backed.
2. Religious Intolerance/BJP.
3. Water Shortage/non monsoon season especially
4. Unequal economic development....poor economic planning. 840 million with minimal income surviving on 20 rupees a day. 55 billionaires.
5. Corruption.
6. Capital flight-----$1.5 trillion to $3 trillion.
7. Devalued Currency.
8. Unemployment.....hiring system. Colonial era/Socialist era employment laws.
9. Low Education.investment......poor quality education....poor quality teachers....poor quality students.........loss of the best to foreign countries. Lack of investment into research...R&D.
10.Weak Foreign Policy.........inconsistent foreign policy....the failure of SAARC, and relations with neighbors especially Pakistan. Aspires to be the regional power, is the regional power but no clear leadership.
11. Poorly performing agricultural sector./farmer debts/low investment and innovation.
12. RAW misadventures.
13..............Failed state characteristics/wikipedia/duplicate.
14. Foreign interference...USA/UK.........behind the scenes through the post-colonial elite.
15. Rapid population growth-----------largest population soon--2030?...........Unfortunately some of the big players and policy makers in India, and so called touted experts keep repeating that a continued population growth along the present trajectory is somehow good for India's future providing a youthful future generation who will increase productivity and demand for the future..........misses the fundamental point that any nation with X amount of resources, and Y level of effective governance can only deliver Z amount of goods and services which satisfy the overall population. My contention is, and I say this most emphatically that given the experience of the last 60 years it is highly unlikely that the "Indian state" will be able to satisfy even the basic needs of most of its people..............................there WILL still be a lot of poor people in India by 2030, never mind any additional new population (500 million more ????), and therefore logically India should very seriously with the zeal of Indira Gandhi think about containing the population growth meaningfully, comprehensively and quickly...............otherwise the overpopulation of India will create failed state characteristics such as those in Bangladesh (no real threat to anyone except as a liability to itself...........300 million by 2050)........and Pakistan about 400 million by 2050, a failed state slowly sliding into anarchy and war, especially in its Western parts.
16. Poor governance.....political parties/bureaucracy/poor leadership.
17. Poor environmental policies/ enforcement and awareness by public--state and national.
18. Post colonial elite...which has no fealty to India.......exemplified by capital flight.
19. Poor infrastructure.
20. Small industrial base.............28% of GDP...low investment in this sector.
21. Weak financial system.
22. Indian bureaucracy...............red tape.
23. Backward society and the inherent problems of any backward society, culturally and psychologically........religious obscurantism and fatalism...........Problems of society explained away as Karmic etc.
24. Indian colonial era police......corruption and criminality.
25. Cultural stagnation....crass, trash Western copy Bollywood/Hindi movies etc.
26. Social harmony and value......soaring crime rates etc....standard social norms.
27. Inconsistent defense policy---low defense expenditure; dreams of a great power mixed up with the true needs of India's defense.
28. Legal system, legal codes, and justice system over burdened, irrelevant and unIndian....does not meet the needs of the ordinary Indian.
29. Poor sanitary and health standards generally.
30. Poor nutrition producing a vast pool of low quality under performing generations....for the future....when did India last win a gold medal in the previous Olympics?
The national failures above are the failings of the Congress Party which has more or less ruled India for the last 62 years approaching, nobody else.
Obviously the BJP can't go into the next elections with geriatric Advani at 86, OBVIOUSLY NOT. The party needs to move on, and present a fresh face and some more new messages. Preferably new messages which are more in line with the national sentiment, and the overall complex Indian society. North all the way to Chennai, from the West all the way East to Arunchal Pradesh.
Arun Jaitley seems intelligent, cosmopolitan and most importantly the right age (56). He should be chosen as the next head of the BJP into the next elections, and Advani should be moved out and retired writing his memoirs and biography.
Some secretly want Modi to be the next head of the BJP but the problem with Modi is that he is fundamentally a divisive character who will further divide India. Yes, Yes, Yes Mussolini and Hitler created jobs, made pretty young men in uniform march down the street, instilled a sense of national pride and discipline, falsely, .................and made sure the trains ran on time.....and all that, but in the process they also further destroyed MORE than they ever created, which had a lasting good effect. Modi is a good state minister, if you like conceded in a gangsterism way, but only a good state minister.......not a national leader.
The BJP should sort itself out quickly.
Jul 9, 2009
Iran and the recent elections.
.
.
.
.
The recent Iranian "elections" were obviously rigged to make sure Khamenei's stupid little worthless puppet was re-elected. Election rigging unfortunately is not unique to Iran but is far more widespread than most people realize or dare think about. It is a phenomenon of rich and poor countries alike..........USA, India, and lastly the Soviet Union being a simple classic example........with 99% voter turnouts sometimes, and all voting for the same party.
Elections are in their simplest form about power and elite groups jostling for power, influence and loot,............ where the will of the people save a few countries is actually irrelevant. But a charade must be presented for the consumption of the ordinary man, and so it is with most elections.
So what is the big deal with Iran? Well its been 30 years since the UNISLAMIC regime came to power. Thousands of people executed by the UNISLAMIC regime around 1979, civil war with lefties the Tudeh party around the early 1980's left a 100,000 dead or executed; a 1,000,000 killed fighting Iraq, and quite a few others killed by the UNISLAMIC regime since.
Mullah Iran is quite simply the worst regime the Iranian people have had to endure, covering a history of 2500 years. Past regimes were maybe incompetent, maybe corrupt, but never incompetent, corrupt AND tyrannical.
Mullah Iran's governance is poor, living standards are significantly down since 1979, but it relies on the tricks of meaningless populism/sloganeering, religious piety (Shia nationalism) and simple state terror (street thugs such as the Basij-----boys on motorbikes armed with chains and knifes)-------that is the sum total of the "legitimacy" of the UNISLAMIC regime. The billionaires and millionaires in the country are the mullahs, who sell poor Iranians to the Gulf as sex slaves for profit.
That such a bad regime should still be in power is indeed very sad. The Revolutionary Guard and the VEVAK ensure that the regime stays in power, but the writer below omits the critical backing of Western powers especially in Europe who help maintain the mullah regime. Without this covert help from Europe, the mullah regime with its corruption, and complete ineptitude would have disappeared from the page of time long time ago. Largely illiterate (by Western standards) Mullahs running Iran by themselves is a misnomer; it is an incorrect description of the real power structure in Iran...............Ahmedinejad has no real power but is a mere front; behind him is the mullahs, and the officials from state security VEVAK, and the Revolutionary Guards, and ultimately behind them the backing of the UNISLAMIC regime by certain European powers.
Iran requires a revolution from within to topple this evil alien regime that is in power in Tehran now. Then a new leadership needs to be established consisting of civilians ONLY, from within Iran.
___________________________________________
Iran Update: Khamenei on the Way Out?
.
.
.
The recent Iranian "elections" were obviously rigged to make sure Khamenei's stupid little worthless puppet was re-elected. Election rigging unfortunately is not unique to Iran but is far more widespread than most people realize or dare think about. It is a phenomenon of rich and poor countries alike..........USA, India, and lastly the Soviet Union being a simple classic example........with 99% voter turnouts sometimes, and all voting for the same party.
Elections are in their simplest form about power and elite groups jostling for power, influence and loot,............ where the will of the people save a few countries is actually irrelevant. But a charade must be presented for the consumption of the ordinary man, and so it is with most elections.
So what is the big deal with Iran? Well its been 30 years since the UNISLAMIC regime came to power. Thousands of people executed by the UNISLAMIC regime around 1979, civil war with lefties the Tudeh party around the early 1980's left a 100,000 dead or executed; a 1,000,000 killed fighting Iraq, and quite a few others killed by the UNISLAMIC regime since.
Mullah Iran is quite simply the worst regime the Iranian people have had to endure, covering a history of 2500 years. Past regimes were maybe incompetent, maybe corrupt, but never incompetent, corrupt AND tyrannical.
Mullah Iran's governance is poor, living standards are significantly down since 1979, but it relies on the tricks of meaningless populism/sloganeering, religious piety (Shia nationalism) and simple state terror (street thugs such as the Basij-----boys on motorbikes armed with chains and knifes)-------that is the sum total of the "legitimacy" of the UNISLAMIC regime. The billionaires and millionaires in the country are the mullahs, who sell poor Iranians to the Gulf as sex slaves for profit.
That such a bad regime should still be in power is indeed very sad. The Revolutionary Guard and the VEVAK ensure that the regime stays in power, but the writer below omits the critical backing of Western powers especially in Europe who help maintain the mullah regime. Without this covert help from Europe, the mullah regime with its corruption, and complete ineptitude would have disappeared from the page of time long time ago. Largely illiterate (by Western standards) Mullahs running Iran by themselves is a misnomer; it is an incorrect description of the real power structure in Iran...............Ahmedinejad has no real power but is a mere front; behind him is the mullahs, and the officials from state security VEVAK, and the Revolutionary Guards, and ultimately behind them the backing of the UNISLAMIC regime by certain European powers.
Iran requires a revolution from within to topple this evil alien regime that is in power in Tehran now. Then a new leadership needs to be established consisting of civilians ONLY, from within Iran.
___________________________________________
Iran Update: Khamenei on the Way Out?
by Hossein Askari
from National Interest
Writing on this site on June 17, I indicated that Ayatollah Khamenei had decided to interfere in the presidential election because he and his backers (the intelligence services and the Revolutionary Guards) were afraid of a takeover by Hashemi Rafsanjani if Mir Hossein Moussavi won the presidential election. So Khamenei and his backers preempted the possibility that he might be replaced as supreme leader by rigging the election in favor of their man, Ahmadinejad. After the election and the initiation of protests, it appeared the regime had two options, with neither boding a promising future—a total crackdown against dissent and closing of clerical ranks or mandating new elections. The government largely adopted the former option. But the clerics did not close ranks as expected and a critical rift that may be irreparable has developed. An increasing number of powerful clerics and technocrats now see only one available option for saving the clerical system without unimaginable bloodshed—replacing Ayatollah Khamenei and soon. Let’s fill in the blanks.
Even before the election, a number of clerics and technocrats felt that the Islamic Republic was in serious trouble. Corruption, economic mismanagement and consolidation of all levers of power by Ahmadinejad, with the supreme leader’s support and blessing, had gone too far. The Islamic Republic was no longer distinguishable from a corrupt run-of-the-mill dictatorship. What made it even more troubling to some of these religious scholars was that it was all being done in the name of Allah and Shia Islam.
The election and its aftermath took matters onto another plane of abuse for these scholars. The poll results were so fraudulent as to insult human intelligence. Khamenei abused his position by prematurely confirming Ahmadinejad’s victory, treating the opposition with little regard and, worst of all, attributing it to “divine intervention.” The brutal crackdown caused much agony among religious scholars. Some scholars saw their religious influence continually eroded under the Khamenei-Ahmadinejad system. Some might have even seen all of this as shame brought upon Shia Islam. But above all, religious scholars saw the recent actions of the regime as a perversion of everything Islamic. Iran and Shiism were loosing face rapidly, not only among other Muslims, but also in the world at large. No true religious scholar could sanction the regime’s actions as Islamic.
Thus the statement on Saturday by a group of relatively senior religious scholars (Association of Researchers and Teachers of Qum) that the election was a fraud and the government illegitimate has further undermined the regime’s mantle of religiosity. Many members of the group are students of Grand Ayatollahs Montazzeri and Saneii (who have already forbidden collaboration with the regime) and are teachers and researchers at Mofid University in Qum. Some members marched with the protesters after the elections. Their actions and statements are essentially targeted at all of Iran’s Grand Ayatollahs, to push them into collective action against the regime. Some members of the group have even gone as far as arguing for dissolution of the whole system, including the velayat-e-faqih. The Republic will now have an increasingly harder time defending its “Islamic” designation. It is religious illegitimacy, not the absence of democratic values, which will eventually undermine the regime in Tehran.
Still many, if not most, religious scholars in Iran uphold the clerical system introduced by Ayatollah Khomeini. They and much of the Iranian public may want the system preserved, but this may be difficult, if not impossible, with Ayatollah Khamenei as the supreme leader. He has in the eyes of many betrayed Ayatollah Khomeini’s vision and legacy. A replacement for Ayatollah Khamenei will have to be made soon if further defection and bloodshed is to be forestalled and the system preserved.
While Hashemi Rafsanjani covets the post of supreme leader, he won’t ascend to the position under the prevailing circumstances. The clerics, with the support of the intelligence services, the Revolutionary Guards (including the Basij) and the regular military, will have to settle on a true Islamic scholar who has no political ambitions, who is not corrupt, who is dedicated to Islam and who can restore Iranian and regional faith in the regime. While the new supreme leader will be the public face of the Islamic Republic, the day-to-day responsibilities of the office will in all likelihood be in the hands of seasoned politicians, such as Hashemi Rafsanjani.
The regime is at the proverbial “tipping point.” The United States and the West should act cautiously if they are to support the aspirations of the Iranian people.
___________________________________________
Hossein Askari is the Iran Professor of Business and International Affairs at the George Washington University.
The idiots who play the game from Iran via Turkey?, is plastic bags, and bags in general and the number 3. Now imagine a 40 year old with a beer belly running off with somebodies bag containing their lunch and nick nacks, into the sunset in broad day light--------the mullahs in Iran can and do, and so can you.
May 10, 2009
The Problem of Kashmir.
.
.
.
.
. . . . An old article by Karan Thapar, about Kashmir and the problems within that state. Written by a good journalist who has come a long way since I first watched him on Sunday morning current affairs programs on Channel 4 in the mid-1980's.
Insurgency problems of center/regional relationships can be interpreted in two different ways within India. From the right, the problems are usually seen as security problems, which require a little bit more oomph within security, with a greater security presence, greater counter-insurgency operations, tougher international stance on security, and stricter regional and national anti-terrorist laws.
On the other side is the explanations and solutions offered by Karan Thapur which tries to look at the source of the problem, how it evolved, and how it can be solved through peaceful political means-------more sensitivity, understanding and love from the center.
As I understand it the security problems of Kashmir, the Punjab in the 1980's especially and Assam were the sole creations of the Central government in Delhi, and more specifically the Congress Party, AND more specifically related to the personality and governance style of Mrs Indira Gandhi. I am by no means endorsing it as a Congress created phenomenon of failure, the Congress Party after all has many good talented well intentioned people.
The problem begins with a lack of governance by the central government, with a strong perception by the dissenting locals that the central government does not care about the important concerns of the local masses, AND then on top of that a negative perception of actual and imagined interfere with local politics to the detriment and suppression of local interests, usually in a ham fisted rough shod way (East Pakistan/Bangladesh 1952----1971, being the classic example viz the Pakistan central government in Islamabad )
The Congress Party had more or less been in power for 40 uninterrupted years and it had become fat, lazy and corrupt by the end of that era (1947---1989). It lacked ideological conviction and zeal, and it sustained itself in power for the sake of power, and not governance. It was a quasi-dictatorship which manifested its true color in the Emergency of 1975--77.
The problem was compounded by the dynasty politics of the Congress Party where deference was given to candidates on the basis of family lineage rather then on true merit----an absurd situation in an aspiring secular modern country. This system resulted in the coronation of Indira Gandhi as head of Congress over many better candidates, and with her coronation she brought in her conceptions of family entitlements, she was after all the daughter of Nehru no less, greater political and economic corruption, making her family billionaires covertly, and her peculiar brand of politics, as a women in a mans world where she had to constantly prove herself against the better record of her fore fathers.
And of course she had her personal traits of being a control freak, who trusted very few people. Some one who enjoyed hosting international conventions in India, millions of them which ultimately had very little relevance for India, except for the fact that such events allowed her to pose, make presentations with speech making, and the approval of the Western chattering classes.
It is the insecure, control freak nature in her character which resulted in the disasters, (for India) in Kashmir, Assam, Punjab and of course Sri Lanka.
And Karan this is the second part of the explanation why with the exception of the Punjab,............. insurgency still continues in those and other parts of India, which you missed out on. Her actions ill-conceived and insensitive allowed the predatory powers around India to recruit people into insurgency groups against India, and its interests. Pakistan in Kashmir, especially from 1990, as one clear example. The Assam insurgency, the Maoist insurgency, indeed all modern insurgencies (Mr. B. Raman) require the backing of state entities without which they cannot sustain themselves against a modern state, especially the size of India. But it is the misgovernance of the central government first and foremost, which allows outside predatory powers to take advantage of such situations in the second place.
So what are the solutions?
________________________________________________
Time to Say Sorry. Karan Thapar in the Hindustan Times. 2008.
.
.
.
. . . . An old article by Karan Thapar, about Kashmir and the problems within that state. Written by a good journalist who has come a long way since I first watched him on Sunday morning current affairs programs on Channel 4 in the mid-1980's.
Insurgency problems of center/regional relationships can be interpreted in two different ways within India. From the right, the problems are usually seen as security problems, which require a little bit more oomph within security, with a greater security presence, greater counter-insurgency operations, tougher international stance on security, and stricter regional and national anti-terrorist laws.
On the other side is the explanations and solutions offered by Karan Thapur which tries to look at the source of the problem, how it evolved, and how it can be solved through peaceful political means-------more sensitivity, understanding and love from the center.
As I understand it the security problems of Kashmir, the Punjab in the 1980's especially and Assam were the sole creations of the Central government in Delhi, and more specifically the Congress Party, AND more specifically related to the personality and governance style of Mrs Indira Gandhi. I am by no means endorsing it as a Congress created phenomenon of failure, the Congress Party after all has many good talented well intentioned people.
The problem begins with a lack of governance by the central government, with a strong perception by the dissenting locals that the central government does not care about the important concerns of the local masses, AND then on top of that a negative perception of actual and imagined interfere with local politics to the detriment and suppression of local interests, usually in a ham fisted rough shod way (East Pakistan/Bangladesh 1952----1971, being the classic example viz the Pakistan central government in Islamabad )
The Congress Party had more or less been in power for 40 uninterrupted years and it had become fat, lazy and corrupt by the end of that era (1947---1989). It lacked ideological conviction and zeal, and it sustained itself in power for the sake of power, and not governance. It was a quasi-dictatorship which manifested its true color in the Emergency of 1975--77.
The problem was compounded by the dynasty politics of the Congress Party where deference was given to candidates on the basis of family lineage rather then on true merit----an absurd situation in an aspiring secular modern country. This system resulted in the coronation of Indira Gandhi as head of Congress over many better candidates, and with her coronation she brought in her conceptions of family entitlements, she was after all the daughter of Nehru no less, greater political and economic corruption, making her family billionaires covertly, and her peculiar brand of politics, as a women in a mans world where she had to constantly prove herself against the better record of her fore fathers.
And of course she had her personal traits of being a control freak, who trusted very few people. Some one who enjoyed hosting international conventions in India, millions of them which ultimately had very little relevance for India, except for the fact that such events allowed her to pose, make presentations with speech making, and the approval of the Western chattering classes.
It is the insecure, control freak nature in her character which resulted in the disasters, (for India) in Kashmir, Assam, Punjab and of course Sri Lanka.
And Karan this is the second part of the explanation why with the exception of the Punjab,............. insurgency still continues in those and other parts of India, which you missed out on. Her actions ill-conceived and insensitive allowed the predatory powers around India to recruit people into insurgency groups against India, and its interests. Pakistan in Kashmir, especially from 1990, as one clear example. The Assam insurgency, the Maoist insurgency, indeed all modern insurgencies (Mr. B. Raman) require the backing of state entities without which they cannot sustain themselves against a modern state, especially the size of India. But it is the misgovernance of the central government first and foremost, which allows outside predatory powers to take advantage of such situations in the second place.
So what are the solutions?
- A mixture of love, sensitivity, respect and cutting of some slack from the center to those areas......saying "we trusts you"..."We have faith in you to govern yourself appropriately, and if you are not 100% perfect, its OK with us, your government won't be dismissed and central rule imposed.............we let the local people decide how effective you are in government, during state elections"
- Greater central funds for the states. 50/50 share of the government budget between the Central and local State government.
- Smaller states which are more realistically representative of local needs and more effectively governed. Why not 30-40 states eventually, within the overall Indian Union .
- Get rid of arbitrary and ham fisted security laws which harm innocent people, and fill the ranks of the insurgency movements. There are some allegations that the Indian military have been infiltrated by the RSS. What cannot be disputed is that the Indian police is one of the worst performing in the world, and one does not think that the Indian paramilitary is that much different. As to RAW there are many colorful things one could say about that organization especially in relation to Sri Lanka and the LTTE. So lets avoid POTA, TADA or any draconian laws which "energize" right-wing fruit cakes within the ranks of Indian security with communal agenda's, who are as with most of South Asia essentially corrupt post-colonial security forces who through their illegal actions fill the ranks of the insurgency.
- Lets reform the Indian security apparatus. Essentially it is a legacy of the British Raj, geared to fight for the British Raj...................the security institutions of India have quaint Anglofied names, which operate poorly compared to First World countries. Let us reform these organizations comprehensively, give them new uniforms, new equipment, better training, new Hindi names and better pay. The basic salary of a Indian police officer is 3,500 rupees? Obviously part-time crime must fulfill his basic needs.
- Let us seal the borders of Assam/Myanmar.........Assam/China..........Nepal/China.........Bhutan/China.............Kashmir/Pakistan........and so forth, building better communications with these states in terms of road and rail.
________________________________________________
Time to Say Sorry.
Are we responsible for the distrust, even the alienation, Kashmiris feel when they consider their 60-year association with India? Have we betrayed promises, mistreated our fellow citizens, trampled on their rights and brutally shattered their dreams? Did our behaviour make the insurgency ‘inevitable’?
It may seem odd to ask these questions when Srinagar is enjoying its best summer since 1989 but, I would argue, this is one reason why they need to be asked all the more forcefully. Just because the situation seems more normal doesn’t mean the underlying grievances have disappeared. And if we don’t look for honest answers we could slide back towards the precipice.
In a book called My Kashmir, recently published in America, Wajahat Habibullah suggests the answer is yes. And Wajahat should know. A Kashmir-cadre IAS officer, he served twice as Divisional Commissioner Kashmir. Since 1970, when he started his career as a Sub-divisional Magistrate in Sopore, he’s witnessed how Kashmiris were treated by both the state and central governments.
“The first in a series of blunders”, Wajahat writes, was the dismissal of Sheikh Abdullah’s government and his subsequent arrest in 1953. The Sheikh was not just a hero to his people, he was also the main force behind the accession. He symbolised Kashmiri hopes as well as the link with India. Even a half century later, long after the Sheikh’s days of glory, Wajahat says “Kashmiris look upon his arrest as the first of many betrayals”.
However, it’s the eyewitness evidence that Wajahat presents that is the truly compelling part of his answer. During his first assignment Wajahat discovered that, unlike the rest of India, in Kashmir “the only active law was the Defence of India Rules, which allowed the police to keep their reasons for arrest and detention secret”. Though designed to tackle national security in wartime, in Kashmir they were used to enforce routine law and order. “Small wonder”, he concludes, “that a feeling of subjection had begun to permeate people’s minds”.
Whilst elsewhere in India elections provided a safety valve to ventilate anger, in Kashmir they became a means of denying freedom and subjecting the people to unrepresentative rule. Wajahat recounts the 4 steps by which elections were undermined. First, “reject the nomination of the opposition”. Second, impersonation during the voting “with the pliable presiding officer turning a blind eye to fake identification”. Third, “the ballot boxes could be stuffed with ballots”. And, fourth, “the winning and losing numbers were simply changed to favour the ‘preferred’ candidate”.
Two developments in the 1980s, Wajahat suggests, made the insurgency inevitable. The first was the midnight dismissal of the Farooq Abdullah government in 1984. At the heart of the problem was the clash between Farooq and Indira Gandhi. “She considered (him) a whippersnapper who owed her his position”. He sought to assert his independence, hosting opposition conclaves in Srinagar. Wajahat concludes: “The questionable manner of the Farooq government’s ouster confirmed Kashmiri suspicions that New Delhi would only allow supplicants to rule the state”.
The other was the election of 1987, rigged by the National Conference and Congress. Wajahat confirms that the voting in Amira Kadal was blatantly manipulated to ensure Yousuf Shah’s defeat, whilst his polling agents “were imprisoned without bail for months under the state’s draconian Public Safety Act”. Today, Yousuf Shah is better known as Syed Salahuddin, the head of the Hizbul Mujahideen and the Chief of the United Jehadi Council. Refusal to let the opposition win “drove a disaffected public into rebellion … convinced that freedom … was inaccessible”.
Twenty one years later, can harmony be restored? Wajahat suggests the happy summer of 2008 could be illusory: “It is doubtful whether harmony can ever be fully restored”. But if we want to try — and we must — Wajahat offers a small slender line of hope: “It had been clear to me from early on that resolution in Kashmir could come only with the restoration of Kashmiris’ dignity”.
With elections just three months away, isn’t it time to start? If the answer is yes, I suggest we begin with an apology. We owe them one.
May 9, 2009
Mir Jafar Deobandi Busharaf of MOSSAD.
.
.
.
.
Can you be a Mir Jafar, a Pakistani head of state, a former head of the Pakistan military, a deobandi Pak Sunni true believer who wages jihad against Shia's using Wahabi Arabs, a once true believer and backer of the Taliban, a man very comfortable in Western media circles craving their applause and attention, a puppet of Washington, a military hero chumping at the bit to attack India, AND work for MOSSAD ALL at the same time?
In Pakistan you can with a little guidance from America and Issshrahell.
It also helps if you are a little mixed up, morally and psychologically.
The only problem is we do not know which is the true Busharaf. Which of his many layers and faces are really his, or those of his foreign handlers. In the process of working for his foreign handlers since the 1960's, we do not know what % of his decisions were his or of his foreign handlers; particularly his critical career for Pakistan since the 1990's.
There is nothing to dislike the man personally, as I am not from Pakistan. However as one born in Bengal, with its history, the idea that the former head of state in Pakistan, and the head of the military is a foreign trained and guided agent is disturbing to say the least.
Consider Mir Jafar, the general who sold himself in order to get into power in Bengal, which he ultimately enjoyed only for a few short years. But the consequences of his ONE action had very serious negative consequences for countless millions of his countrymen, for generations after generations well after he died, even to this day, 252 years after that sad event of monumental betrayal to his people and nation.
Must I list the tragedies since that date?
Can we not forgive Mir Jafar?
After all it was one mistake, which with the help of hindsight he surely would not have made, and which his immediate relatives tried to rectify, under Mir Kassim at Buxor, with the help of allies from the UP. No, no, no, let us not compare Mir Jafar to Busharaf.............after all Busharaf has worked for the firaangi for four decades, covertly, hiding, lying with ample opportunities to reflect upon his choices and decisions, and to correct them. With Busharaf we are not talking about a one off lapse of judgment, and of misplaced loyalties and conscience.
But even with Mir Jafars one off mistake, given his position and responsibility, he inflicted a major catastrophe upon the people of Bengal and India. Quite rightly his name will forever live in infamy. Bengal the first major state to be conquered by the British, was the springboard which they used to conquer the rest of India, over a period of 100 years (1757--1849, cessation of Anglo-Sikh wars). It was the Bengal Presidency army of 150,000 by the 1790's which helped the British conquer India. The British Raj army that fought Tipu Sultan, the Maratha's, the Pindari and the Sikh's...........until it had enough of them, with their arrogance and misrule.
Not that this service to the empire was EVER repaid. 1769, 10 million Bengalis died from forced starvation, since the East India company required the growing of cash crops such as Indigo, jute and Opium instead of rice....30% of the population died...genocide. The systematic looting of the richest state in India, known as the "Pearl of India" before the Britsh arrived, into its most destitute part after the British conquered it. To this day Bangladesh, West Bengal, Bihar and Orissa constitute the most backward and poverty stricken parts of South Asia. Such is the legacy of British rule. .........252 years after they first set foot there, with Mir Jafars ONE unwitting mistake. The Pogroms against the local populations, mass rape, murder, the destruction of the vibrant local industry in the ensuing decades. The death of a few million more in forced starvation during 1943, just before independence.
Then the tragedy of East Pakistan/Bangladesh, by no means through chance and accidents, but the result of a British colonial mindset articulated through the post-colonial elite of Pakistan and the British trained Pakistan military......the economic exploitation over a quarter century, juxtaposed with the sheer evil brutality of the "Pakistan military" as a last farewell gesture, and the death of 3,000,000 civilians and the rape of 300,000 women can only be explained in the colonial context. But this too is Mir Jafar's legacy.
Bangladesh now, under British control is slowly sliding into the abyss. Its a member of the Commonwealth, still celebrating the magnificent British empire; it hosts British military advisers; it sends its best cadets to Sandhurst for top up training; and the two political parties of the left and right are more or less managed by the British; corrupt, worthless, useless, agenda less, bickering over nothing, doing absolutely nothing. This too is Mir Jafar's legacy.
Once one bad apple sets the tone, it is for the future generations to share the burden of the mistake of one man.
Are there Mir Jafars like Busharaf in the Pakistan military?......most certainly. The tragedy of Bengal does not have to be visited on Pakistan, we can learn from history and not allow it to repeat itself. We have the historical example of Bengal, and the stark example of Iraq and Afghanistan more recently. However at this moment in time, Pakistan is slowly sliding in that direction through the betrayal of the Pakistan military. Only the Pakistan military top brass. Solely the Pakistan military top brass.
We can avoid this.
The post below by Abid Ullah Jan at Dictatorship watch has been edited by me.
_____________________________________________
The mysterious relationship between General Musharraf and the CIA began in the 60s at SSG – the special service group (commando unit at Cherat in NWFP). Mush stayed there for seven years – an unusually long period. Mush was recruited in by the CIA 1966. Mush stayed at SSG up to 1973. And then Mossad came in the picture when Musharraf went to Turkey for training.
However, how does it connect to Musharraf and him being the agent of foreign intelligence agencies long before he even thought that he would be the Commander in Chief? Here are some tips for thoughtful, resourceful and brave researchers to find the truth about the real Musharraf and bring him to justice for treason and betrayal under his own Army Act:
- Question: Why was Musharraf fired in Oct. 1999?
- Tip –1 : Musharraf's illegal foreign contacts are not so hidden either . Some were revealed, but no one will talk. They became state secrets. See the case of Javed Hashmi, for example.
- Tip – 2: In the 80s, there was a Journalist John Doe and his wife Agent Jane Doe, in Rawalpindi.
John Doe was divorcing his wife. It was in court. Musharraf was the representative of the lady Jane Doe in the court. Divorce happened but Mush made sure that John Doe did not open his mouth about the real reason behind the divorce in Public Court.
The real reason behind the journalist John Doe divorcing his wife was that she was an agent of a foreign intelligence agency. As John Doe discovered it, he no longer wanted to continue the marriage. Interestingly, journalist John Doe's wife was a very close relative of Musharraf.
- Tip – 3: This is authentic story. But to find out about the journalist John Doe and his wife Jane Doe in detail, one has to check the family court record in Rawalpindi. During the divorce proceedings Musharraf was the representative of the lady Jane Doe.
It shows that as an Army officer, Pervez Musharraf covered the connection of a lady to a foreign intelligence agency. Normally one is supposed to tell the authorities. That gives credence to the well founded allegations that he also had, and still has, foreign handlers.
How is it connected to 9/11? When I was doing my research into the ISI connection to 9/11, I gave General Musharraf a huge benefit of the doubt in the book, From BCCI to ISI: The Saga of Entrapment Continues. However, the deeper one goes, the more he realizes that it is almost impossible that ISI would be using its human assets; its human assets will be linked to the CIA, M16 and others; the human assets will be meeting Osama and the foreign agencies at the same time; the Chief of the ISI will also be meeting his human assets as well as the high level officials in the US around the same time and also wiring money ($100,000) to the lead "hijacker” in the Operation 9/11.
Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad was never questioned by 911 commission, is a Tableeghi Jamaat member with a long beard now. He maintains a house at Mai de Khoi, Faisalabad and one in Islamabad. He was chairman of a government entity like fertilizer corporation. Musharraf was never asked as to why he said," Daniel Pearl got over intrusive......". Why Omar Sheikh was never produced in an open court? And why Benazir talks of Omar Shiekh as the murderer of Osama with David Frost on November 2,2007?
Musharraf was the Director Military Intelligence when the CIA supported the creation of the Taliban/Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. Brig. Gen. Ejaz Shah was the handler of Omar Sheikh per Benazir. This shows Musharraf was very much part of 911 and cover up (of it being inside job with Dick Cheney at Command.
Musharraf's connections to foreign intelligence agencies since the early period of his carrier suggests that he is not out of the loop when it comes to operation 9/11. He is one of the main culprits. If any other individual had sent even a dime to Atta, he might have died of waterboarding and other torture techniques by now. However, General Mohamoud is a free main in Pakistan. So despite deep connections to the alleged hijackers to the ISI, nothing happens to the Pakistani Generals or Pakistan as such. To the contrary, remember how former CIA director James Woolsey tried to prove Atta met Iraq security officials, but could not. That was the time when they were looking for justifications for the war of aggression on Iraq.
Eqbal Ahmad in 1998 said that Osama was just the excuse to go into the Oil lands......Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan. And his observation seems true. The warlords needed time. They needed moles at the highest positions, such as the Chief of Pakistan armed forces. Musharraf had to kill the Chief of Air staff Mushaf Ali Mir because he won't agree with Musharraf's policy and planning(Mushaf was a patriot). He had to depart. Mushaf died in a plane crash in clear weather in the most safest plane, along with his wife and closest confidants. Controversial author Gerald Posner implies that all of these events are linked together and the deaths are not accidental, but have occurred because of the testimony of captured al-Qaeda leader Abu Zubaida in March 2002 (see Early April 2002). The deaths all occurred not long after the respective governments were told of Zubaida’s confessions. This simply confirms foreign hand in Mushaf’s murder.
Benazir did not agree to Musharraf policies. Note that Musharraf says that she was "very unpopular in the Army". Musharraf thinks he alone is the Army. Benazir would not budge on his uniform issue. She had to go.
Musharraf has violated his Oath five times. It is up to the Patriotic Army men to understand the situation and use the Army Act on Musharraf to protect Pakistan from internal aggression.
.
.
.
Can you be a Mir Jafar, a Pakistani head of state, a former head of the Pakistan military, a deobandi Pak Sunni true believer who wages jihad against Shia's using Wahabi Arabs, a once true believer and backer of the Taliban, a man very comfortable in Western media circles craving their applause and attention, a puppet of Washington, a military hero chumping at the bit to attack India, AND work for MOSSAD ALL at the same time?
In Pakistan you can with a little guidance from America and Issshrahell.
It also helps if you are a little mixed up, morally and psychologically.
The only problem is we do not know which is the true Busharaf. Which of his many layers and faces are really his, or those of his foreign handlers. In the process of working for his foreign handlers since the 1960's, we do not know what % of his decisions were his or of his foreign handlers; particularly his critical career for Pakistan since the 1990's.
There is nothing to dislike the man personally, as I am not from Pakistan. However as one born in Bengal, with its history, the idea that the former head of state in Pakistan, and the head of the military is a foreign trained and guided agent is disturbing to say the least.
Consider Mir Jafar, the general who sold himself in order to get into power in Bengal, which he ultimately enjoyed only for a few short years. But the consequences of his ONE action had very serious negative consequences for countless millions of his countrymen, for generations after generations well after he died, even to this day, 252 years after that sad event of monumental betrayal to his people and nation.
Must I list the tragedies since that date?
Can we not forgive Mir Jafar?
After all it was one mistake, which with the help of hindsight he surely would not have made, and which his immediate relatives tried to rectify, under Mir Kassim at Buxor, with the help of allies from the UP. No, no, no, let us not compare Mir Jafar to Busharaf.............after all Busharaf has worked for the firaangi for four decades, covertly, hiding, lying with ample opportunities to reflect upon his choices and decisions, and to correct them. With Busharaf we are not talking about a one off lapse of judgment, and of misplaced loyalties and conscience.
But even with Mir Jafars one off mistake, given his position and responsibility, he inflicted a major catastrophe upon the people of Bengal and India. Quite rightly his name will forever live in infamy. Bengal the first major state to be conquered by the British, was the springboard which they used to conquer the rest of India, over a period of 100 years (1757--1849, cessation of Anglo-Sikh wars). It was the Bengal Presidency army of 150,000 by the 1790's which helped the British conquer India. The British Raj army that fought Tipu Sultan, the Maratha's, the Pindari and the Sikh's...........until it had enough of them, with their arrogance and misrule.
Not that this service to the empire was EVER repaid. 1769, 10 million Bengalis died from forced starvation, since the East India company required the growing of cash crops such as Indigo, jute and Opium instead of rice....30% of the population died...genocide. The systematic looting of the richest state in India, known as the "Pearl of India" before the Britsh arrived, into its most destitute part after the British conquered it. To this day Bangladesh, West Bengal, Bihar and Orissa constitute the most backward and poverty stricken parts of South Asia. Such is the legacy of British rule. .........252 years after they first set foot there, with Mir Jafars ONE unwitting mistake. The Pogroms against the local populations, mass rape, murder, the destruction of the vibrant local industry in the ensuing decades. The death of a few million more in forced starvation during 1943, just before independence.
Then the tragedy of East Pakistan/Bangladesh, by no means through chance and accidents, but the result of a British colonial mindset articulated through the post-colonial elite of Pakistan and the British trained Pakistan military......the economic exploitation over a quarter century, juxtaposed with the sheer evil brutality of the "Pakistan military" as a last farewell gesture, and the death of 3,000,000 civilians and the rape of 300,000 women can only be explained in the colonial context. But this too is Mir Jafar's legacy.
Bangladesh now, under British control is slowly sliding into the abyss. Its a member of the Commonwealth, still celebrating the magnificent British empire; it hosts British military advisers; it sends its best cadets to Sandhurst for top up training; and the two political parties of the left and right are more or less managed by the British; corrupt, worthless, useless, agenda less, bickering over nothing, doing absolutely nothing. This too is Mir Jafar's legacy.
Once one bad apple sets the tone, it is for the future generations to share the burden of the mistake of one man.
Are there Mir Jafars like Busharaf in the Pakistan military?......most certainly. The tragedy of Bengal does not have to be visited on Pakistan, we can learn from history and not allow it to repeat itself. We have the historical example of Bengal, and the stark example of Iraq and Afghanistan more recently. However at this moment in time, Pakistan is slowly sliding in that direction through the betrayal of the Pakistan military. Only the Pakistan military top brass. Solely the Pakistan military top brass.
We can avoid this.
The post below by Abid Ullah Jan at Dictatorship watch has been edited by me.
_____________________________________________
Musharraf had handlers in Mossad-US Agency at least since the 80's.
By Abid Ullah Jan.The mysterious relationship between General Musharraf and the CIA began in the 60s at SSG – the special service group (commando unit at Cherat in NWFP). Mush stayed there for seven years – an unusually long period. Mush was recruited in by the CIA 1966. Mush stayed at SSG up to 1973. And then Mossad came in the picture when Musharraf went to Turkey for training.
However, how does it connect to Musharraf and him being the agent of foreign intelligence agencies long before he even thought that he would be the Commander in Chief? Here are some tips for thoughtful, resourceful and brave researchers to find the truth about the real Musharraf and bring him to justice for treason and betrayal under his own Army Act:
- Question: Why was Musharraf fired in Oct. 1999?
- Tip –1 : Musharraf's illegal foreign contacts are not so hidden either . Some were revealed, but no one will talk. They became state secrets. See the case of Javed Hashmi, for example.
- Tip – 2: In the 80s, there was a Journalist John Doe and his wife Agent Jane Doe, in Rawalpindi.
John Doe was divorcing his wife. It was in court. Musharraf was the representative of the lady Jane Doe in the court. Divorce happened but Mush made sure that John Doe did not open his mouth about the real reason behind the divorce in Public Court.
The real reason behind the journalist John Doe divorcing his wife was that she was an agent of a foreign intelligence agency. As John Doe discovered it, he no longer wanted to continue the marriage. Interestingly, journalist John Doe's wife was a very close relative of Musharraf.
- Tip – 3: This is authentic story. But to find out about the journalist John Doe and his wife Jane Doe in detail, one has to check the family court record in Rawalpindi. During the divorce proceedings Musharraf was the representative of the lady Jane Doe.
It shows that as an Army officer, Pervez Musharraf covered the connection of a lady to a foreign intelligence agency. Normally one is supposed to tell the authorities. That gives credence to the well founded allegations that he also had, and still has, foreign handlers.
How is it connected to 9/11? When I was doing my research into the ISI connection to 9/11, I gave General Musharraf a huge benefit of the doubt in the book, From BCCI to ISI: The Saga of Entrapment Continues. However, the deeper one goes, the more he realizes that it is almost impossible that ISI would be using its human assets; its human assets will be linked to the CIA, M16 and others; the human assets will be meeting Osama and the foreign agencies at the same time; the Chief of the ISI will also be meeting his human assets as well as the high level officials in the US around the same time and also wiring money ($100,000) to the lead "hijacker” in the Operation 9/11.
Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad was never questioned by 911 commission, is a Tableeghi Jamaat member with a long beard now. He maintains a house at Mai de Khoi, Faisalabad and one in Islamabad. He was chairman of a government entity like fertilizer corporation. Musharraf was never asked as to why he said," Daniel Pearl got over intrusive......". Why Omar Sheikh was never produced in an open court? And why Benazir talks of Omar Shiekh as the murderer of Osama with David Frost on November 2,2007?
Musharraf was the Director Military Intelligence when the CIA supported the creation of the Taliban/Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. Brig. Gen. Ejaz Shah was the handler of Omar Sheikh per Benazir. This shows Musharraf was very much part of 911 and cover up (of it being inside job with Dick Cheney at Command.
Musharraf's connections to foreign intelligence agencies since the early period of his carrier suggests that he is not out of the loop when it comes to operation 9/11. He is one of the main culprits. If any other individual had sent even a dime to Atta, he might have died of waterboarding and other torture techniques by now. However, General Mohamoud is a free main in Pakistan. So despite deep connections to the alleged hijackers to the ISI, nothing happens to the Pakistani Generals or Pakistan as such. To the contrary, remember how former CIA director James Woolsey tried to prove Atta met Iraq security officials, but could not. That was the time when they were looking for justifications for the war of aggression on Iraq.
Eqbal Ahmad in 1998 said that Osama was just the excuse to go into the Oil lands......Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan. And his observation seems true. The warlords needed time. They needed moles at the highest positions, such as the Chief of Pakistan armed forces. Musharraf had to kill the Chief of Air staff Mushaf Ali Mir because he won't agree with Musharraf's policy and planning(Mushaf was a patriot). He had to depart. Mushaf died in a plane crash in clear weather in the most safest plane, along with his wife and closest confidants. Controversial author Gerald Posner implies that all of these events are linked together and the deaths are not accidental, but have occurred because of the testimony of captured al-Qaeda leader Abu Zubaida in March 2002 (see Early April 2002). The deaths all occurred not long after the respective governments were told of Zubaida’s confessions. This simply confirms foreign hand in Mushaf’s murder.
Benazir did not agree to Musharraf policies. Note that Musharraf says that she was "very unpopular in the Army". Musharraf thinks he alone is the Army. Benazir would not budge on his uniform issue. She had to go.
Musharraf has violated his Oath five times. It is up to the Patriotic Army men to understand the situation and use the Army Act on Musharraf to protect Pakistan from internal aggression.
Abid Ullah Jan is the author of "The Musharraf Factor" and edit www.dictatorshipwatch.com.
___________________________________________
The above article by Abid Ullah Jan is well researched. However he misses the most serious crimes of Busharaf, among many which need to be focused on:
It is alleged Busharaf as Brigadier in the late 1980's, and later as Major-general organized Arab Wahabi with Pashtun Sunni Jehadis, to wage war against Pakistanis who were Shia in the NWFP and the Northern territories. And that that policy has continued since then into 2009, at a much reduced level through the Pakistan military controlled Taliban. Creating a civil war scenario like Iraq, besides the human cost against fellow Pakistanis.
Busharf along with three other generals planned the Kargil war, in order to undermine the Sharif government, which was seeking comprehensive peace with India, which in turn had it been realized would have strengthened the position of the Sharif government and increased its international stature. The war with India besides being illegal by the standards of International law, was poorly planned and carried out, without the slightest intention of winning; no regular heavy units were committed to that campaign, but instead poorly armed and trained irregulars, NLI and a few SSG. Busharaf and his pals casually strolled into war against a nuclear foe, and reportedly playing golf at the height of the brief war. Besides the loss of prestige for the military, and the nation, about 4,000 men died on Pakistan's side.
Finally of course Busharafs participation in the "al-Qaeda" GWOT myth, and the handing over of 650 innocent mostly Afghans with Pakistanis, to legitimate and reinforce the JEWUSA lie.
There are no crimes greater that even comes close to what Busharf has done against Pakistan. That he is being slowly groomed to retake power by his American backers, and he conspires thus extensively for his American masters in Pakistan is an absolute outrage.
_______________________________________
BUT Busharaf is one man, and one thinks there are other foreign backed agents in the Pakistan military......it could be Kiyani, or more likely Suja Pasha, head of the ISI.
We see what happened to Iraq when the Americans bought the entire intelligence, and military of Saddam, before they invaded the country and "liberated" it. 1.2 million Iraqis dead; 4.5 million internal and external refugees; the country ethnically cleansed into three separate parts, with three different administrations; the levels of physical destruction to the country, and the JEWUSA is not done yet.....they are going to be there for another few decades.
A lot of Pakistan's problems could be solved if the Pakistan military is sorted out, and the American's distanced from interfering with Pakistani affairs.
If not, then its the legacy of Mir Jafar again.........and an unfolding tragedy for generations to come. For Pakistanis there are ample historical warnings of such things.
Pakistanis must not be shy in seeking out the Mir Jafars amongst them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)