The Fix is in.

.
.
.
.



Even so called sophisticated political pundits can't seem to see the bigger picture, that many non-voters in the USA seem to see, namely that American presidential elections are mere Punch and Judy puppet shows run by Wall Street and the Jewish elite of the USA.

Goldman Sachs runs the Obummer administration.

Goldman Sachs and Wall Street to a great degree ran the Bush II administration.

The Jewish lobby has a over bearing influence in Capitol Hill.

Never the less, despite this sad fact, the USA cumulatively over 230 years has through the endeavors of hard working emigrants has made the country into a great nation, despite the present situation, and that it must still go through the facade of "Presidential elections".....the longest election contest in the world....12--15 months?

Obummer, recruited by the CIA just like his mother, has been groomed to rule the country and he is anointed by the Jewish elite to run the country for a second term. He is a mere front of the Jewish power elite........who use the Democratic Party, the traditional Jewish party where 80% of Jews vote to effect their specific agenda's for Israel, and for themselves.

In the foreign policy arena this has meant endless wars for Israel, and in the domestic arena the process of establishing a full police state, on the basis of "al-CIA-duh" and Tim Osman.

A second CIA led/Wall Street Obummer administration will be decidedly bleak, nasty, brutal, and far more dictatorial in the USA, and the world. With the Gay farts speaking double speak through their rectums whilst wreaking havoc in the USA, and around the world.

The only solution for the world is to disengage from the USA power system, and attempt to roll this power back to the Capitol Hill/Wall Street sewer, where it belongs.

Mitt Romney the Moron, with all smiles and his close ties to Israel will not win the next Presidential election.



















_____________________________

Are the Republicans deliberately throwing the presidential election?

by Justin Raimondo at antiwar.com

The economy is in a mess, and – in spite of the Obama administration’s pathetic attempts to conjure a "recovery" out of thin air — looks like it is tanking. The European banks are on the verge of a meltdown, and the jobless rate in this country is much higher than anyone in officialdom is willing to acknowledge (although ordinary people know the truth). What’s more, America’s position abroad is none too good: after being driven out of Iraq, which is falling into the Iranian orbit, we’re well on our way to losing the war in Afghanistan, and the whole region is in turmoil. Israel is threatening to start World War III with an attack on Tehran, an act that would drive the world economy over a cliff. Would you want to be President when the price of oil is over $200 a barrel?

Which brings us to the question that has been hovering around the edge of my consciousness ever since the Republican primary battle commenced: is the GOP deliberately throwing the 2012 presidential election?

Yes, I know the Republicans hate Obama and all he stands for, and I certainly have heard them inveigh against the President in ways that would formerly have been considered off the reservation not too long ago. For example, trying to delegitimize a sitting President by questioning his US citizenship, and/or implying he’s a "secret Muslim" – I mean, really! Surely that’s over the top, to put it mildly. And yet …

And yet I am a firm believer in action over words: and if we look at what the Republicans are doing (or, rather, not doing), as opposed to what they are saying, it’s enough to arouse a certain suspicion that something just isn’t right.

On the one hand, the GOP is telling us Obama is leading us down the road to "socialism," that he’s "appeasing" our enemies and stiffing our friends, and that he’s basically destroying the country. On the other hand, they haven’t put forth a candidate who has a chance in heck of beating him. The leading candidate for the party’s nomination is a caricature of everything voters are sick and tired of:

he’s a phony, a spoiled rich guy, an automaton whose words and actions convey, above all, an almost comical impression of inauthenticity.

Furthermore, aside from these personal failings, Mitt Romney’s record is uniquely suited to collapse before a well-financed and relentless assault from the President and his supporters. While the Republicans rail against Obamacare as a step toward "socialism," Romney is himself on record as having supported the very same "individual mandate" so abhorred by the GOP. As the former governor of a very liberal state, Romney wouldn’t have lasted long as a "severe conservative" – unless such "severity" now means issuing a proclamation of "Gay Youth Pride Day" and supporting tax-funded abortion on demand.

When it comes to foreign policy, what is striking are the similarities rather than the much-touted differences between the two: in spite of Romney’s rather unconvincing sallies at the President over Obama’s supposed "weakness," when it comes to specifics it’s hard to see where Romneyism ends and Obamaism begins.

Both want us to stay in Afghanistan as long as the military chieftains insist: both see the US as gate-keeper and guardian of "world order," and – on the pressing issue of the day — both continue to maintain Iran is developing nuclear weapons in spite of what our own intelligence is telling us. Going right on down the line, on specific foreign policy issues the ‘difference" between them is chiefly rhetorical. Romney and Obama have repeatedly voiced their unconditional support for Israel, in spite of the fact that the real interests of the US in the region are ill-served by such an unreasonable pledge. Even when Romney lashes out at Obama for his "weakness" before "our number one geopolitical foe" – hapless, declining Russia – it turns out his actual position is practically identical to the President’s: both want to use the threat of installing a missile shield over Eastern Europe to blackmail the Kremlin into joining the effort to isolate Iran and otherwise kowtowing to Washington.

In short, there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between the two when it comes to the vitally important issue of America’s role in the world – which isn’t all that shocking, come to think of it. After all, "politics stops at the water’s edge," as a long-dead interventionist Senator (and badly-compromised turncoat) once put it, and that rule is strictly observed in Washington, where the bipartisan interventionist consensus brooks no dissent.

Romney isn’t so much a serious candidate for the presidency as he is a national joke: his record as a "flip-flopper," his inability to project anything remotely resembling sincerity, and his Richie Rich persona have all combined to turn him into a human piñata for both liberals and conservatives to pick apart. Which leads us back to the question I asked at the beginning: is the GOP deliberately throwing this election?

It makes sense if we take the economic critique proffered by anti-inflationists like Ron Paul and Gerald Celente seriously: would you want to be President if we’re on the brink of another Great Depression? As the American dollar is destroyed, and the buying power of the average American is about to become the equivalent of a consumer in, say, Zimbabwe, is it really in the GOP’s interest to take the White House this year?

In spite of Romney’s rhapsodizing over the joys of yet another "American century" on the way if he wins the White House, I suspect the judgment of the Republican Establishment deviates quite a bit from this rosy scenario. They know that, whatever the outcome of this election, the country faces what the Israelis call an "existential crisis," albeit not one embodied by the specter of non-existent Iranian nukes. And while the cause of the crisis is economic, the consequences will be felt in virtually every sphere, including the foreign policy realm. With a much-reduced ability to project military power overseas, the US will be caught in a conundrum: how to reconcile our image as a "great power" – indeed, the world’s last remaining "superpower" – with the gritty reality of a nation going into foreclosure.

Ron Paul isn’t the only one conjuring visions of America as Greece-times-ten, and it doesn’t take much imagination to see how the march to austerity will be met here in this country, where Americans’ sense of entitlement is almost as well-developed as their taste for vulgarity. What happens when the bread-and-circuses stop, and Americans are forced to confront the grim reality of being broke?

Back in the winter of 2008, when the economy was taking a major nose-dive and the too-big-to-fail crowd was threatening a financial version of the Samson Option, top US officials were quietly discussing the prospect of rationing food and fuel, and making plans to call out the military to keep order. Although President Bush was still officially in office, Obama was waiting in the wings, preparing to take the reins – and one imagines the defeated GOP didn’t envy him. Quite the contrary: and I doubt they ever want to be in the position Obama found himself in, which is why I believe it is quite possible that the Republican leadership – by which I mean the Republicans’ big money backers – have decided to throw the election this time around.

The strategic thinking behind this can be summed up in three words: After them – us! That was the slogan of Germany’s Communist party in the 1930s after the fateful election which brought the National Socialists to power. The Communists, having rejected an alliance with the German Social Democrats on orders from Moscow, were convinced they would be catapulted into power as a result of the backlash from Hitler’s victory at the polls – a strategic calculation that had "backfire" written all over it, as Trotsky pointed out at the time.

Before taking that historical note too far, however, I have to admit the idea of the Republican high mucka-mucks getting together and deciding it would be better for them to throw the election to Obama by putting up a loser like Romney does seem a bit far-fetched. Perhaps they’ve convinced themselves, on one level, that Romney can actually win, while – on quite another level – they don’t believe it for a minute. People usually have no trouble holding mutually exclusive beliefs in other areas, and politics is certainly no exception.

In your heart, you know he’s a loser – now there’s a campaign slogan tailor-made for the politics of Bizarro World. Which is all the more reason to believe there’s some truth to it.

If voters are in the mood to punish the Democrats somehow, and if they can’t in good conscience do it on the presidential level, then isn’t it more likely they’ll take it out on the rest of the ticket? If Republicans can retain control of the House, that may be enough to keep them from regretting their loss at the top of the ticket. Another wave of victories on the state and local level will perhaps be enough to satiate them, at least for the moment, until they get another crack at the White House. Then they can sit back and blame the President for everything, as the crisis unfolds, while cat-calling from the sidelines: a perfect set-up for career politicians who have no principles, no sense of duty to the country, and no compunctions about defrauding their supporters. With Congress in their hot little hands, they can obstruct the President’s domestic agenda and heckle him into getting more aggressive on the overseas front – a perfect vantage point from which to observe the rapidly accelerating decline of the American empire.

Endorsement of Ron Paul for President

.
.
.
.
I wanted Ron Paul to win the 2008 Presidential election, but he was crowded out by the CIA mentored, came from no where candidate Barack Hussein Obama, backed by the Neo-Liberal wing of the crypto-Jew Zionist elite in the Republican Party.

An ominous reflection of the state of affairs such as they existed in the Soviet Union during the 1980's before its collapse, where the Jewish run KGB was appointing its members and non-members as Premiers into ultimate collapse and disaster for the Soviet Empire in 1991........a fraction of the Jews in the country WANTED THE Soviet Union to collapse and fail, because this was their international tribal objective.

No other Communist state has to date collapsed.......not even Pol Pots in Cambodia, invaded by Vietnam. The collapse of the Eastern European Communist states was at the behest and instigation of the Jewish run KGB working with their local Jewish agents in those countries....Markus Wolf head of the Stazi, by way of one example.

The American election system is rigged and therefore, tightly controlled which results in the Twiddle Dee and Twiddle Dumbs of the Zionist controlled vaudeville act of over 12 months anointed as President. Ron Paul thus never had a chance.

The 12 month long vaudeville farce is an elaborate process of sublimation and final Imperial Coronation by the Zionist elite for the Zionist elite of their "Chosen Candidate". Democracy, even crude Third World democracy does not exist in the USA. Though this never stops the USA lecturing other nations about the virtues of pure SOLID Democracy.

However if an outside candidate shows sufficient grass roots support, then the fake vaudeville farce must recognize this fact. To do otherwise will make the system all to obviously rigged even to morose Joe six-pack......the vaudeville of 12 months thus must be subtle to remain reasonably legitimate. Ron Paul won the Iowa election so he was put in Third behind a utter non-candidate bible thumper, and he also won the New Hampshire libertarian state, so he was put in second place.

The crime is when alternative news outlets report such results as fair and somehow acceptable, which contain glimmers for hope and change.

Of course Ron Paul himself is also an establishment candidate. A man who serves so many years in Capital Hill, and beckons his son to join the gravy train can only be an establishment candidate, with their instantly recognizable codes and demeanor. Ron Paul fills the alternative bit part role in the Zionist run vaudeville of Capital Hill which passes itself as Democracy.

The trick is to keep the masses within the system and not push them into joining the massed ranks of the LEADERLESS OWS movement, which are less controllable by the Zionist elite.

BUT in the sum total of things in a world which is fundamentally unfair, irrational, and stupid.......in a world where Jew scum float to the surface along with their dumb fuck WASP minions to do their bidding, Ron Paul looks rather hopeful and appealing in the messages and policies he purports to support. Bear in mind good reader that politicians always change their tune once in power.

But there it is, Ron Paul the WASP, looking earnest, sincere, wholesome........slightly too old.......zero charisma.....with the best policies out of ALL the republican candidates and obviously far better than CIA President Peace Prize Barack Hussein "I want to reach out and understand Moslems Cairo speech" Obama.

So good luck Ron Paul. I hope for America's sake you win. The same consistent position I held in 2008..........but significantly more detached this time.

_____________________________

Ron Paul Is The Only Candidate With The Momentum to Challenge Romney

Gingrich, Santorum, Huntsman campaigns are all collapsing

Paul Joseph Watson at Infowars.com

Ron Paul’s second place in New Hampshire confirms him as the only candidate going into South Carolina and Florida with any kind of momentum to challenge Mitt Romney, with support for Santorum, Gingrich and Huntsman collapsing.

Jon Huntsman’s one chance to insert himself into the top tier by beating Ron Paul to second in New Hampshire has failed. Despite the establishment media attempting to use Huntsman as a Ron Paul spoiler, in addition to dirty tricks on behalf of the Huntsman campaign in creating an anti-Huntsman video and blaming it on Paul supporters, the former Obama administration official didn’t even get close to Paul last night.

Indeed, with Huntsman performing best amongst voters opposed to the Tea Party, he stands no chance of performing well in the more conservative states. Huntsman isn’t even on the ballot in Arizona, Virginia or Illinois. In South Carolina he is currently polling less than Comedy Central host Stephen Colbert.

Meanwhile, Rick Santorum’s second place in Iowa was followed by a poor fifth place finish in New Hampshire. After pouring money into the state, visiting more than 30 times and making it a top priority, Santorum was expected to achieve somewhere between 10-20% of the vote yet ended up with a disappointing 9.3 per cent.

With limited funds remaining after a New Hampshire gamble that failed to pay off, Santorum’s campaign, and his current potential third place finish in South Carolina and Florida, is under threat. Ron Paul’s ads lambasting Santorum as “a corporate lobbyist and Washington politician” with “a record of betrayal” are also eating away at his support amongst conservatives.

“The momentum has dissipated. You can’t save political capital, you have to spend it right away. He took his capital and let it dissipate,” said Larry Sabato, a political science professor at the University of Virginia.

Meanwhile, Newt Gingrich, who the polls suggest is Romney’s closest rival in South Carolina and Florida, had his campaign hire a cavernous ballroom at the Radisson Manchester for last night’s primary that ended up being barely a quarter full as Gingrich stumbled in fourth place with 10 per cent.

Gingrich, who has cut an insreasingly angry and aloof figure over the past few weeks, didn’t even bother to congratulate Romney or Paul on their success. One of his aides has also been accused of assaulting a woman for carrying a sign at a campaign stop. Gingrich’s support has been savaged by 96% of all Super PAC money being spent attacking his candidacy, illustrating the fact that Republicans clearly don’t want to see him challenge Obama in a fight Gingrich would almost certainly lose.

After emerging as a clear frontrunner, Gingrich’s numbers have dropped off alarmingly. Ron Paul’s debate attack on Gingrich when he labeled him a “chicken hawk” has undoubtedly made red state conservatives think twice about supporting a man who enthusiastically supported Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats’ attempt to impose a carbon tax on the American people under the discredited pseudo-science of global warming.

Polls show that Ron Paul is the only other candidate besides Romney who has a good chance of beating Barack Obama in a hyothetical head to head. He trumps all the other challengers to Romney in terms of electibility.

The key for Ron Paul is the fact that is Romney takes South Carolina and Florida, several if not all of the other candidates will suspend their campaigns or drop out altogether. This will force the media to frame Paul as Romney’s adversary and will allow Paul to unleash a barrage of attacks exposing Romney’s record as a big government RINO Republican.

Messianic Michele Bachmann on mission from heaven for Israel (NOT the USA)

.
.
.
.
Messianic Michele Bachmann is strange with her Christian fundamentalist pronouncements about this and that, where she within the Jewish configured American Presidential election is the front runner for the Republican Presidential nomination.

She with the Anders Brevik Norway connection, and a place where the Zionists carried out a false flag op to promote Israel recently, in a weird way........."Israel is secure and strong because it has the unquestioned loyalty of psychopathic Christian Zionist sympathizers even in the most liberal prosperous Western country, who will do whatever it takes to support Israel"........I think in a twisted way that was the message by the Israelis to themselves first of ALL and secondly the Western world, among whom many a thinking individuals are obviously realizing gradually the problems associated with Israel.

So reciting passages from the littoral bible and messianic visions and utterances will solve America's fundamental problems?

OF......... The mortgage crisis; the Wall Street banker crisis; the Federal Reserve national financial crisis; the governance crisis; the Capital Hill corruption crisis; the Presidential crisis; the poverty crisis; the unemployment crisis; the healthcare crisis; the education crisis; the crime crisis; the immigration and open border crisis; the constant wars for Israel crisis; American Jews who work for Israel crisis; Rothschilds agents in government crisis; Debt crisis; the infrastructure crisis; the security state crisis.

But along with Rick Perry, a globalist former internee for Al Gore cum Christian fundamentalist are hardly serious candidates to challenge Obama.

But Israel requires Christian fundamentalists who will stand shoulder to shoulder with her, regardless of the genuine needs of the USA, and so such peculiar fringe candidates come to the center of the Republican Presidential nomination race.

Regardless of the fact that they may have dangerous messianic visions.

______________________

From whatreallyhappened.com and Mike Rivero:

REASON NUMBER 28 (why she shouldn't be President): SHE REMINDS ME OF THE LEADER OF THE HEAVEN'S GATE CULT!

A FEW REASONS TO DROP MICHELE BACHMANN

As with many intelligence agencies in the West who operate for Israel, funded by the taxpayer to serve another country, this is the fundamental problem for the USA.

Mega pint sized Jew becomes defacto US President.: Jewish takeover of America complete.

In the old days they use to hide their true identity, and over play the WASP one, waxing lyrical and oh so polite, righteous and apple pie: Teddy Roosevelt, F D Roosevelt; Harry Soloman Truman, Ike Eisenhower Lyndon Johnson (1933--1961 continuous unofficial Jew rule).

..........But now they don't have to pretend and hide in America. They are more up front now. The Jew takeover of America is complete with Rahm Emmanuel as defacto President, accomplished over a course of 100 years. With 50 million African Americans unofficially, 50 million Hispanics unofficially, and 40 million Christian Zionists on their side theoretically. Backed by a vast network of approximately 6 million scheming Jews working with Israel, hot wired and paranoid, who control the American:

1) Media, and thus control what people think, see and talk about.

2) Security.............who is a good American, who is a bad American according to the Jew (The Jewish built gulags can now hold up to 10 million people in America). The Jew decides what is a threat to America and what is not.

3) Finance..........you follow our economic system or you starve on the streets and prairies.............and of course no less important, finally.

4) Capitol Hill which completely ignores the wishes of ordinary Americans. The average Americans want one thing despite the media, Capitol Hill has another idea.

There is a gross contradiction here, where a well organized clique destabilize and destroy a great country, the sole hyper power, and the vast majority of the people in American do not want this. Somethings got to give as they say, and the Jews aren't going to give in.

The Jew has been told by his religion and the Rabbi's rabid conditioning from childhood that he is the supreme Lord of this world, and that this dream for him 'seems' to be coming true at last, after 5,000 years of human history. That through a few more acts of devious behavior he may yet inherit the earth.


So whats in store for the good people of America?

More security emergencies and the round up of many millions of Americans, especially if ordinary Americans get any funny ideas, and show resentment towards the current Zionist administration. America has the biggest prison system in the world with 2.5 million people behind bars. To them whats wrong with a few more million people behind bars working for nothing, in this beautiful Utopian Jewish paradise?

To warm things up we could have a false flag op in America to distract from the mess created by the Jew in America; to increase their control over America, and also as a way of expanding the war further for Eretz Israel, with perhaps attacks against Pakistan, Syria or Iran in the near future. We should not forget that the foundation and groundwork for 9/11 were laid whilst the Jewish controlled Democratic party was in power....1993 WTC, 1995 Oklahoma, WACO.......and so forth.

The Jewish engineered depression of the American economy could worsen with millions out of jobs, millions becoming available for war and conscription fighting fodder for endless Jew wars into the next few decades of Armageddon, grunting, wounded, dying and sacrificing around the world.

The merging of America with Jewish run Canada, and Jewish run Mexico into one super state. The disappearance and submergence of American identity under the deep cloud of war, terror and economic depression, all caused by the Jew.

What Americans must do?

They must do what their forefathers did 230 years back, talk, organize and revolt against a Jewish run system which makes them work harder for less. Americans must find the courage, and revolt politically against the system and establish a "Third Force" similar to Ross Perot. The two party system will never give them a true American candidate, only more Jew front cardboard cutouts who treat them like fawning suckers, singing tongue in cheek blurry meaningless platitudes written at Zion central, whilst totally ignoring their basic and reasonable wishes.

America should not go the way of the Soviet Union 1918-1991, which was run by the Jews (60 million killed....according to Alexander Solzhenitsyn). Americans must revolt before it is too late for them and the world.


Judicial-inc.org

www.bollyn.info

Counterpunch

One final point. The Cuban missile crisis. The Soviet Union is run and controlled by Jews since 1918, with an Ukrainian Jew as its Premier, Nikita Khrushchev (Perlmutter) at the time of the crisis, visiting America in the late fifties and promising 'change' from Stalin, the Georgian Jew. America is also run by Jews, and it too just had its long line of Jew leaders (Teddy Roosevelt, F D Roosevelt, Harry Soloman Truman and Ike Eisenhower).

The Jew in America know that Jews run the Soviet Union because the Jew in America, on orders of the Jew Rothschilds in Europe had originally funded the Bolshevik revolution in 1918, with their money and their people (Trotsky (Bernstein) coming out of Jew York, Lenin from Switzerland). Prominent Jewish families like the Rockefeller's, Armand Hammer and many other Jews maintained close links with the Jewish run Soviet government until its demise in 1991. Indeed they funded key industrial projects in the country, under Stalin's "Five" year plans.

So was the Cuban missile crisis a high stakes poker game hoax? What was the real objective of the game?

America during the Cuban Missile crisis was under JF Kennedy of Irish Catholic descent, who averts certain global annihilation, or so we are led to believe. A year later, for attempting to block Israels covert acquisition of nuclear weapons technology from America, and for reigning in the Jewish run Federal Reserve, he is killed by the Jews in America.

Another reason he is killed is because his administration wanted to deal with the American mafia. The FBI under his Lordship JE Hoover stated to his end in 1972 that there was no such thing as the mafia in America. Hoover was more interested in individual high profile criminals in the 1930's and 1940's.........Communist infiltration during the 1950's and internal subversives in the 1960's....COINTELPRO. Robert Kennedy thought otherwise. What Robert Kennedy did not know was that the American Mafia was Jewish.

The Kennedy administration wanted to pursue these above agendas because they thought it would serve the best interests of America and was their mandated rightful duty to do so, not because they were into an anti-Jewish crusade. They were naive in the ways of power, and given the American media, there weren't any obvious intelligence from the rightful sources even to a President of America that Jews controlled the country in many respects with its criminal dimensions (political control and manipulation, prostitution, money laundering, drugs, slavery, finance, the media, fraud, pornography, forgery........and any other good businesses).

JFK, his brother Robert Kennedy and JFK's son much later were killed for this reason. Edward Kennedy was left alone one assumes because he was perceived as a total non entity. Indeed even though JFK only served 2 years, and promised much to America and the world; was sexually promiscuous, with allegations that his father made a fortune during the prohibition, his loss psychologically still plays an important moment for Americans, not because of what he did as much as what he promised to do for America.

But the question is, what would have happened during the Cuban missile crisis if he and his people were not running America, and it was another Jew? That is if the Cuban missile crisis was for real, or a massive PR stunt.

Is the Jew from this planet, or here to test humanity?

With Jew Lyndon Baines Johnson, it was Socialism at home, and endless war abroad, "confronting" "Jew Communism" and securing the opium market in Asia, after the American military had been primed by the non-show of the Cuban missile Crisis, and the disaster of the Bay of Pigs. War abroad with Socialism at home, with the addition of a cultural revolution and other social revolutions, by the Jew in sixties America, flower power, open immigration and deregulation.

Afghanistan has a lot of Opium. Production has increased substantially since the Americans "liberated" the country in 2001.

Cardboard politicians for cardboard elections.

Interesting observations from Xymphora on the choice of Palin as VP.

I think the 120 million white evangelical Americans was an important factor behind that choice. In a nation where barely over 50% vote, from the overall American population who are registered to vote (78%)-----on average only 40% out of all American adults vote, and participate in their 'democracy'. In that scenario the Christian evangelicals vote block becomes very very critical. Then you factor in Diebold, and banana Republic electioneering which has become the norm in the country, and one can see why Palin was chosen.

I think the choice of her as VP is quite appropriate.

I think having two old grey haired men side by side on the Presidential ticket, was viewed negatively, one as President and the other as VP. For all Lieberman's political skills, the fact that he is an independent cum Republican counts against him, as not being clearly identified as the 'right' type of Republican candidate.

Youngish porn sexy Palin is attractive because she is clearly identified with a specific constituency, the evangelicals who matter to the Republican core support base. The fact that she might have zero talent is irrelevant if she is carefully managed by her handlers, and conspicuously absent from real debates, just Like Bush. It wouldn't be the first time that her types have been elected to high office in the USA. The difference this time round is that, to reflect true current Republican politicians and leadership, you have two complete card board cutouts.

__________________________________________

Deep Palin

By Xymphora

You know you are deep in conspiracy land when the people who are supposed to know things pronounce themselves dazed and confused. The two Palin questions:

1. where the hell did she come from?; and
   
2. how could McCain have made such an awful choice?
   

are starting to be answered, leading us to some amazing conclusions.

Remember that it was Israel that started the renaissance of the Right in the late 70s. At the same time, the Israeli government was actively courting the new 'religion' called Christian Zionism, an unlikely alliance as the Christian Zionists were profound anti-Semites. The big plan was that the moribund Right would revitalize itself with the spice of Christian religious outrage, and the Christian Zionists would be turned into temporary supporters of Israel as Israeli strength was needed to lead to the 'rapture', an old idea brought to the forefront by a lousy and obscure novelist named Tim LaHaye. The 'war on terror' was added to the mix later to give the Americans a reason to continue to support Israel after the fall of the Soviet Union (the recent revitalization of the Cold War is another front in the same quest).

Palin was secretly chosen by a cabal of Christian Zionists called the Council for National Policy. Its members include . . . Tim LeHaye (I wonder who paid him to write his books?). McCain, who didn't even know Palin before she was picked, had nothing to do with it. Rove told him he couldn't pick his old pals Joe Lieberman or Tom Ridge as they were too 'liberal', and the only way to ensure the Christians would accept the pick was to let them make it. The Christian Zionists, who were only supposed to be an 'add-on' to allow the Republicans to play identity politics, have now taken over the whole party. The old party establishment has been completely excluded, and Wall Street is sending its money to Obama. The Republicans are very close to turning into the bunch of unelectable cranks that everyone accused the Democrats of turning into.

The downside is that the Democrats, already an extreme right-wing party, will become even more dominated by big business (that's the message they sent making Biden, a man who loves big corporations, the VP nominee). The Democrat platform: fascism plus abortion rights. The irony is that the Christian Zionist genie has escaped the Zionist bottle, thus denying the Zionists their most profound dream of Lieberman as VP, and a rabid Zionist President of the United States when McCain croaks.

Both parties are a problem; The system is a problem

I am not sure that the Democrats are the real and only problem Mike. They certainly are part of the problem, and are a vital part of the MIC that is devouring America and the rest of the world. Without this important cog, the war wheel of America couldn't function..........so yes they are central to the current mess America is in, but they are not the only problem.

Essentially the Democratic party is a tool and vehicle for a certain elite who 'use it' for their agenda's. Disband and take this tool way, and all that will happen is that the elite of America will find another vehicle to pursue their agenda's.

In that sense given the power of the real masters of the Democratic party it cannot be fixed. It can never be made to follow the true wishes of ordinary Americans. There is no hope for the Democratic party, and there never was.

1) The real question is, at what point sufficient number of Americans become antagonized with the 'American democratic system' and rebel against it meaningfully---significantly. What triggers it.

2) What do the majority do to articulate their will meaningfully (organizationally), after realizing that the two party system of America is a sham.......an elaborate hoax that is rapidly losing its credibility with ordinary Americans who cognitively recognize the reality of living in America.........contrasted with what the politicians are telling them.

3) How the elite reacts to suppress the will of the majority of Americans. The facts show that the elite will not simply roll over and surrender---------they have money, power, security......and the world is a big place........they can simply leave America if the situation gets too hot for them. They don't mean to change course, which is suitable for the average American. Instead it is a continuation of the same policies and bright ideas....there are no real 'Grand Canyon' differences between the two parties on most substantive issues....but that is something which you should have noticed by now. They mean to stick to their policies and sell them in as many different ways as they can, like any carpet bagger salesman, with third rate wares.

When the tipping point of tolerance goes South from the majority, then there is always the fall back of instituting a full security police state al a comrade Kim. The laws, and the state mechanisms have been built up gradually from the Clinton administration........reaching a crescendo under Bush, but of course these things were planned decades ago.



The secret gulags in America that can hold upwards of 20 million people; the vast security structure; the intrusive prodding of ordinary Americans in their everyday lives.....the militarization of the society...........the super bowl security spectacle........the color coded alerts......war..war and more war. Are these government actions to protect Americans or to control them?

As an individual who has a personal understanding of these things................more than the average person........then I must tell you that all this security spectacle has very little to do with protecting America from a Phantom organization run by the West, 'al-Qaeda' and its long dead leader. In fact this is all about controlling Americans when they get really troublesome.........and when ordinary Americans don't buy the repetition of the hoax of 1929 which was artificially instituted back then. When the rage fly's. When ordinary Americans realize they have been had by a bunch of smooth, 'talking points', super criminals......Americans then won't be like the savings and loans victims of the early eighties........or the embarrassed hapless victims of the early 1930's...it will be different.

You have pure unadulterated criminals running your country, and I don't mean by that George, Hilary or the other leading politicians. These are after all mere fronts. The behavior of your armed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and I assume they take their orders from higher ups, were and are pure criminal. Only a bunch of perverse crooks could behave this way towards two consecutive nations. Add to that the false flag of 9/11 the pivotal point of all this......then America and its ordinary people have serious problem of a dangerous criminal class running the country and Americans are at their mercy.......and the Soviet style laws....the secret gulags........and the particular types of seriously shady people with questionable back grounds manning the key departments......where all this is going does not bode well for the future, for ordinary Americans.


















In that sense your arguments about the Democrats is a little esoteric, in the full context of what I am taking about.......The Democrats were and are part of an illusion, a grand illusion. Thats why 60% of Americans who could theoretically vote don't (includes 22% unregistered)-----only 40% of Americans vote in Presidential elections........is that a democracy? Vast majority of Americans refuse to participate in the charade of American Presidential elections.

This is why the approval rating for Congress recently is around 9%, worse than Bushes approval rating of around 27%, and sliding daily. And this is why these Congress people held a secret closed door meeting in March 2008 to talk about the collapse of the American economy, because of their misrule, and what are the likely consequences..........and how to manage the average American when it all goes pear shaped.

This is not to say that these beings are all powerful, or even know what they are doing.............a lot of them are quite stupid.....in the normal sense.......and unimpressive individuals and humans who through their families........invariably involving criminal activity, now, half a decade ago or even a century ago became very rich...and powerful.

Criminals, even super criminals invariably for some reason are poor managers of nations since their minds are preoccupied with 'other' things. Then you have America, which is the richest, and possibly the most sophisticated nation on earth...........managing such a state for such criminal elements for eternity will be extremely difficult......and there lies the hope. The middle class of America that is decent and righteous must boycott the mainstream parties, and must find their own avenue of expressing their political will, with the help of the working class.
People with integrity that will remain stead fast to the true cause and not switch because they have been groped by AIPAC with a few shekels, amd mesmerized by the illusion of their power.

________________________________________

The Democrats Are The Real Problem

By Mike Whitney

20/07/08 "ICH" -- -- Obama's candidacy is over; kaput. He's already stated that he has no intention of stopping the war, so he has disqualified himself. That's his prerogative; no one put a gun to his head. His op-ed in Monday's New York Times just removes any lingering doubt about the matter. What Obama proposes is moving the central theater of operation from Iraq to Afghanistan. Big deal. Why is it more acceptable to kill a man who is fighting for his country in Afghanistan than in Iraq?

It's not; which is why Obama must be defeated and the equivocating Democratic Party must be jettisoned altogether. The Democrats are a party of blood just like the Republicans, they're just more discreet about it. That's why people who are serious about ending the war have to support candidates outside the two-party charade. The Democrat/Republican duopoly will not deliver the goods; it's as simple as that. The point is to stop the killing, not to provide blind support for smooth-talking politicos who try to mask their real intentions. Obama made his choice, now he can suffer the consequences.

Nancy Pelosi is a perfect example of what the Democrats are all about. Just look at the way she brushed aside the people who got her elected. They mean nothing to her. In a matter of months, the "San Francisco liberal" has achieved what former-Speaker of the House Hastert could only dream of; she's driven the Congress' public approval ratings into single digits for the first time in history making her the worst speaker of all time. She rubber-stamped the FISA bill, concealed what she knew about the CIA's global torture programs, and vowed to stop any public effort to hold the administration accountable for its war crimes. (No impeachment) She has betrayed her most ardent supporters and singlehandedly transformed an already-emasculated congress into a purely ceremonial body incapable of doing the people's work.

At least Bush never betrayed any of his supporters. Never. Pelosi is worse than Bush, much worse.

And yet, liberals still insist that we should vote the Democratic ticket. In your dreams!

What leftist or progressive is not totally fed-up with the Democrats cagey "bait-and-switch" hypocrisy? Voting the Democratic ticket is not a sign of "hope"; it's a sign of being a schmuck. The Democrats have done nothing to stop the war and will do nothing to stop the war. The Obama candidacy is merely a way to replace one group of genocidal maniacs with another. Who needs a charismatic, flannel-mouth glamor boy to lead us into battle when a senile fogy with "anger management" issues will do just fine.

Voters of conscience should reject that choice altogether. Just as they should reject the "lesser of two evils" theory which does not apply when ordinance is being dumped daily on innocent civilians. It has to stop.

Obama is not an antiwar candidate, that is merely a fiction maintained by his public relations team. In fact, he wants to beef up the military with 65,000 additional ground forces and 27,000 more marines. He's also stated that he will add “two additional combat brigades to Afghanistan” and encourage NATO to make “greater contributions—with fewer restrictions”. In his op-ed he boasted, "As president, I will make the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban the top priority that it should be. This is a war that we have to win.”

He also added this ominous warning:

“The greatest threat to that security lies in the tribal regions of Pakistan, where terrorists train and insurgents strike into Afghanistan. We cannot tolerate a terrorist sanctuary, and as president, I won’t. We need a stronger and sustained partnership between Afghanistan, Pakistan and NATO to secure the border, to take out terrorist camps and to crack down on cross-border insurgents. We need more troops, more helicopters, more satellites, more Predator drones in the Afghan border region. And we must make it clear that if Pakistan cannot or will not act, we will take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights.”

OBAMA; THE CANDIDATE FOR ESCALATION

Obama supporters should take their candidate at his word. What he is proposing is a dramatic escalation and expansion of the war into another sovereign country. How is this consistent with the demands of his base or the millions of Americans who believe that Obama represents real change.

It's time for a reality check; the Democrats are the real problem not the Republicans. If the path to peace requires crushing the Democratic Party and its blood-thirsty candidates; so be it. The main thing is to stop the killing. If Obama won't do it; we'll find someone who will?

President John McCain.

John McCain, Zionist Warmonger, Rothschild puppet

By Texe Marrs.


John McCain is a vile, wicked, deceitful man, a warmonger and a sexual deviant. Make no mistake about it. If this man wins the presidency, America is finished as a nation. Forever.

Dumb Beast Led Around by Homosexual Lieberman

In March of this year, John McCain traveled to Israel where he shamelessly pandered to Prime Minister Olmert, the Likudnik extremist Benjamin Netanyahu, and other Zionist Masonic overlords and groveled at their feet. McCain also had a stopover in neighboring, war-torn Iraq, where he was led around like a dumb beast by his Mossad and ADL stooge handler, Jewish bigot, and closet homosexual, Senator Joe Lieberman.

McCain then flew from the Middle East to London where, on March 20th, two Rothschild Illuminati, the super-wealthy Lord Jacob Rothschild and Nathaniel Rothschild, held an "invitation-only" private luncheon for him at the luxurious Spencer House, St. James Place. No doubt, McCain kissed "Lord" Rothschild's ring, if not his big right toe and pledged that, if the powerful Zionist poobah would only make him President of the United States. Israel's enemies, Iran and Syria, would end up nuclear toast.

(blogger: Lady Lynn De Rothschild is backing Hilary Clinton, openly dictating to Nancy Pelosi that Bilderberger Hilary should be the next American President---so obviously the Rothschild dynasty is hedging its bets, and has openly identified itself with the More War For The Jews constituency, overtly backing two pro-war/endless war candidates; not a surprise given the track record of this dynasty, and their involvement in the European revolutions of the nineteenth century, the First World War, the Second World War and so on..........It is a shame that they can manipulate the USA, a superpower with such capable and intelligent people for their specific agenda's, which is clearly inflicting great harm on the American nation to its profound detriment, and so goes without saying the rest of the world. In a sense this is an unique position to be in, as the nations involved in WWI and WWII did not have this knowledge but now we do..............and the next logical step is dealing with the issue meaningfully, so that no further harm is done then that already has been achieved by this blood lust cult dynasty)



"I love you too"

Lovefest between liberal Senators McCain and Clinton: "Not a dime’s worth of difference."

"John McCain is Bought by Jews"

As Nathanael Kapner, a knowledgeable Jew who—thank God!—is also a Jesus believing Christian, writes in his website (www.realjewnews.com), "John McCain knows which side his bread is buttered on. And that's the Jewish side of campaign contributions."

Brother Kapner noted that McCain was at the private Rothschild fund-raiser in the posh London Spencer house. Kapner's sage conclusion: "John McCain is bought by Jews via the Rothschilds!"

Kapner also reported that McCain recently was forced to apologize to the Jews for having the audacity to say in a speech he had given that, "America is a nation founded on Christian values." Immediately, the Jewish organizations sprang into action, prompting the frightened McCain to trot out before the news cameras and retract what he had said.

McCain Betrayed Our POWs

McCain's innumerable deceptions and treachery extend back many years—virtually his whole life is one, big fabrication. Sure, he was a POW, but after he returned from Vietnam, McCain is the dirty rat who sold out the remaining POWs in captivity. He and his liberal pinko buddy, Senator "Swift Boat" John Kerry, even engineered "Favored Trading Status" for their erstwhile Communist friends back in Hanoi. Jane Fonda, Move over!—You've got company.

McCain's father, Naval Admiral John McCain, was an even greater fraud. He's the guy whose cowardice, lies and incompetence as Commanding Officer of Pacific Forces doomed thousand of American troops to misery and death during the tragic Vietnam War. The senior McCain also just happens to be the sorry traitor who stood by and let Israeli bomber aircraft decimate the U.S. Liberty Ship in 1967, killing and wounding so many of our sailors.

Nuking Iran is McCain's Promise

John McCain and his insane, bloodlust, Zionist whack-job colleague, Pastor John Hagee, promise to use nuclear bombs to destroy Iran. That would mean thousands more U.S. fighting men and women going to their graves and tens of thousands more coming home minus legs, arms, and limbs. It would entail the entire world viewing America as a heartless, savage beast nation. John McCain is a monster, period. In a word, this man is a dangerous, soul-less psychopath.

Here is a man who only got into the Military Academy because his grandfather and father before him were military brass and pulled strings. Predictably, McCain finished almost dead last in his graduating class. He never accomplished one positive thing as a Naval aviator. He did, however, manage to execute a miserably incompetent, faulty landing that killed a number of carrier personnel and, later, he was shot down over North Vietnam. Not exactly a picture of success.

John McCain has never done an honest days work in the private sector his entire life. He cheated on his first wife with the much younger Cindy Hensley, then abruptly divorced his wife and married the pretty Cindy within a few weeks. Now come reliable news reports about McCain messing around having an affair with a young Washington D.C. blonde lobbyist, Vicki Eisman. A real "Family Values" character wouldn't you say? McCain is so vile that other Senators have labeled him "President McNasty!"

McCain has threatened to reduce Social Security benefits, and he consistently voted as a Senator for higher taxes. His World War III insanity will bankrupt America and force this nation into a North American Union slave state. But then, why should John McCain care about you, me, and other middle class Americans? This heel married into the Hensley fortune—Cindy's rich dad owned a beer distributorship and reportedly got his fortune via his unsavory ties to the Jewish Mafia.

McCain: "I think gay marriages should be allowed"

John McCain is an unprincipled man who kisses up to the homosexuals, liberals, and The Bohemian Boys embrace. John McCain has promised the Jews to keep U.S. troops in Iraq another hundred years if necessary.

He lies and pretends he's a "conservative" to win high office. In a 2007 Massachusetts forum, the scoundrel stated, "I think gay marriages should be allowed." Yet, on the campaign trail, he often states just the opposite.

I have no doubt that ignorant Christian evangelicals will act like the stupid lemmings they are and go straight over the cliff to support this filthy reprobate, McCain, for President. Like dumb dogs, they'll pull the lever for him simply because he's the Republican nominee. Today's evangelical Christian has no principles and is neither evangelical nor Christian. As Pastor Chuck Baldwin so sagely stated in a recent internet column, "I will say it straight out: any Christian or conservative who supports John McCain has no principles left worth defending."

Pastor Baldwin then went on to observe: "Christians have swallowed the Bush/McCain Kool-Aid as surely as did the followers of Jim Jones. They are drunk with denial and deception."

Of course, the truth is, these Kool-Aid drinkers are not "Christians" at all. They are fakers, hoaxers masquerading as Christians while, in actuality, doing Satan's bidding.

McCain is Every Patriotic American's Nightmare

Liar, compromiser, warmonger, bloody arrogant hothead, and more—I explain in my investigative report exactly why all these derogatory adjectives apply to John McCain. Beware, people of America—Satan's Illuminati-endorsed, straw-brained, would-be U.S. President, is at our door. He's the Rothschilds' stupid, inept, but pliant puppet-and he's every patriotic American citizen's nightmare.

You can read the original article here

________________________________

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=178

http://www.rense.com/general81/mcroth.htm

http://judicial-inc.biz/82jjohn_mccain_and_the_uss_forresta.htm

http://judicial-inc.biz/83_mccain_vows_to_protect_israel.htm

http://judicial-inc.biz/M.cCain_promises_an_iran_attack.htm

http://judicial-inc.biz/83your_future_president.htm

http://judicial-inc.biz/83McCain_airbus.htm

http://judicial-inc.biz/9n_ussLiberty.presidential_issue.htm

Swift boaters against McCain

Reverend Wright (ex-Marines Vietnam veteran) endorses McCain

Reverend Wright supporter of McCain, endorses the Catholic Church, and calls for love, peace and reconciliation of all mankind

McCain is his own master and will do the right thing by America.................he sez