Pessimism will get America and the Democrats nowhere.

.
.
.
.
An insightful, some what frustrated, pessimistic, impatient article by Professor Dave Green, outta Noo Yawk.
.
He is of course quite right that Obama is in danger of being the night watchman, during whose reign the Second Great Depression is ushered in, and thus his administration becomes a motionless dud presidency "fixed"policy wise by economic decline, and he leaves office with an unnoticeable legislative whimper; a one term wonder, all smiles or maybe not later, filled with cross-party compromise/surrender; the uniqueness/novelty of being a black presidency, with a Nobel Peace prize; with on-going wars and not much else. Then a rabid mother of all right wing government comes into power in 2012, under Chilling moose Sarah Palin..........and civilization as we know it ends.......Jesus does a second coming ......read the book.........seen the play.......and the movie.
.
But realistically he has only been in power for just over 8 months, so lets give him a few more months to up his game for America and the world, which presumably the Nobel Peace Prize was trying to nudge him to do for the international community.
.
In understanding American politics, or Western politics generally, one must grasp Israeli politics first, which has shifted markedly to the extreme right lead by the Likud Party. Jewish intellectual thinking especially in Western countries lead by this particular tribal urge from Israel, and the Likud Party, with its fronts and Think Tanks in the West, have made an aggressive assault on the fundamental political thinking of Western societies through various ideological vehicles such as Monetarism, Reagan economics, Neocons........and so forth, dominated all by Jewish intellectuals.
.
You can have good governments both from the center-left and the center-right, it does not matter, as long as the leaders of such parties surrounded by good team players have the right mix of policies which are implemented judiciously, through the national legislature, purely with the interests of the country in which they serve in mind.
.
The problem starts when you have pseudo-Fascists junta's installed at Israel's/Likud's behest in sophisticated Western societies; then what you have is the inevitable disconnect.......the peculiar bizzare BS from the figurehead Israeli card board cut out fronts trying to fit the Israeli centric policies into the domestic square pegs..........Bush II America; Silvio Berlesconi Italy; José Maria Aznar/ Spain; Sarkozy/France. In many respects NOT REAL political leaders of sophisticated Western countries, but circus clowns with the ensuing theatrics.
.
But why is Israel Fascist/Nazi orientated, aren't they supposed to be kosher Jews given sanctuary on Palestinian land to appease "Western guilt"?
.
The reason is simple. In many societies it is the extremist/zealot who is more vociferous and assertive, and consequently it is their agenda which dominates the political plain. In the case of Israel perhaps only 30% of Israelis are true Likudniks, but their aggressive political campaigning means that invariably it is their agenda which usually dominates the political discourse in Israel. It is more than likely that the majority of Israelis want PEACE and ENGAGEMENT with the Palestinians (70%). Israelis like all humans are normal people who enjoy going to beaches for a party, or at home enjoying the intimate company of friends and family, over dinner, the simple basic pleasures of life.
.
HOWEVER, the Likud minority do not wish this. They dream of Eretz Israel; an Israel which is ethnically/racially jackboot pure; an Israel which is a superpower, surrounded by dismembered Arab states, which fear Israel and bow to it. Whilst the Israeli military reminds them continually who is master in the region, frequently,viciously with impunity. These Likudnik "FANTASY DREAMS" cannot be achieved through traditional "Kibbutzim Socialism", and so Israel's fundamental ideological base must be redefined, markedly to the right....far xenophobic rabid right....which then absolves you of genocide, mass murder, colonialism, continued illegal wars.......at least to yourself, and your conscience. After that all you do is go to your local Synagogue and the Rabbi blesses you...and its ALL back to normal.
.
This long process started during the 1970's in Israel, and the UK and USA in the 1980's, consequentially linked a little later. Sir Keith Joseph the ideological mentor of Thatcher in Britain in the Conservative party, and in America numerous Jewish intellectuals, such as Milton Friedman, under the Ronald Reagan administration,starting preaching from the early eighties. The Neocons changed their political colors from a Jewish Trotskyite group based in America into a hardline Israeli Likud linked front more recently.
.
In addition Israel is a tiny country of little over 5 million Jews, and there is only so much it can do, surviving on American largess, and significant donations from global Jewry. For it to realize its Likudnik "DREAMS and FANTASY" of empire, it has to exert control over, domination and direction of key Western nations acting as its proxies.........USA/UK being foremost......France, Germany, Spain, Holland and so forth.....this means dominating the political/ideological debate in those countries so that they do the bidding of Likud Israel.
.
This is significantly assisted by the fake narrative of "al-Qaeda" and the open ended GWOT,which is purely a Israeli manufactured fake war.........and a civilisational conflict with Islam......."Israel's enemies are the Wests enemies"........which is of course not the reality; The rulers and elites of the 57 Muslim majority countries are allies and usually always puppets of the West, and not life threatening enemies........Libya and Iran are installed puppet regimes which have been in power unmolested mostly for 40/30 years respectfully...allowed to exist as boogie boogie scarecrow regimes.
.
Finally the Zionist media in the West, with channels such as "FUCK THE NEWS", Washington Post, NY Times, CBS, ABC and CNN setting the debate and agenda of Israel...........Israel would like to buy the British run Al-Jazeera, just to make sure its message is also beamed to the docile Arab people.
.
In such a scenario Professor David Green........evolving over 30 years by Jews with power, patronage, money, criminal intent, greed, the male ego.....militarism..........thoughts of "survival through expansion" ....for Israel to "survive" it must wage perpetual war...........Obama surrounded by Jews from Israel or otherwise (Axelrod/Immanuel)....has his work cut out facing and opposing the extremist right-wing "surge" from Israel which has been on-going for well over 30 years, AND in addition the strength of the Israeli lobby which follows Israel's dictates, AND finally and decisively the Zionist media in America.
.
You need to be a unique individual, and an unique administration to go against such a trend, and thus:

• EITHER, Obama's administration is a card board cut out non-government for 4 years..."Oh look everybody he is black, with a Muslim name as President of America".......Global audience.."Aaaaaawwwwwwww....shucks.....how marvelous............AND, AND , AND", a time filler administration which becomes the fall guy for the next American depression starting in 2010 (a general recession is not inevitable in the USA).........gracefully/obediently ushering in a rabid right-wing government after him in 2012.
• OR, Obama institutes comprehensive policies in both the domestic and foreign policy arena which serves/saves America exclusively, against the dictates of Likud Israel from the background, and which allow's him to serve a second term.

It goes without saying that courage and imagination is required to achieve the second option.

________________________

"Barry In The Bush With Smiles"

By David Michael Green. October 09, 2009 "Information Clearing House"

-- It takes a real artist to render a crushing majority into a hapless political object.

(After being nominated as the Democrat presidential candidate in 2008, presumably the entire party has accepted him as unquestioned dear leader, and that he has attempted to reinforce this with employment for Hilary in key policy posts....amongst others....so he has no worries about his party supporting his policy agenda's as their dear leader. So why this need to reach out to Republicans?.......Is this a style thang?....Is it bearing fruit? )

And Barack Obama is a real artist.

He’s had quite an impressive week. At least for an anvil.

Here’s one New York Times headline, regarding the Olympics debacle: “Chicago Is Rejected in First Round of Voting”. Impressive.

(Not a big deal, unless you are a real Obama hater, out to nitpick.....High time South America was given a chance to stage the Olympics........and the corrupt prone Olympic Committee decided as much. NOT a snub against Obama....just cus an American President makes a presentation/pitch to the IOC that should not automatically entitle America hosting the Olympics)

Here’s another: “Jobless Report Is Worse Than Expected; Rate Rises to 9.8%”. Can you say “Bye-bye, Barack”?

(Cut him some slack dude..........he has been in power for little over 8 months. It would be more accurate to say that the current dismal employment figures are the result of the mismanagement and criminality of Bush II, over 8 years)

Ah, but he was actually just warming up. David Paterson, the governor of New York, bitch-slapped the president for being stupid enough to lean on Paterson to get out of the 2010 race. Paterson is a disaster as governor, and Obama is worried that he’ll drag down the Democratic ticket, lowering the president’s majorities in Congress.

(Exercising his power and authority within his party....and signaling to others in the party that such behavior/standards will not be tolerated)

The first problem with that calculus is that there are fifty states in the union, notwithstanding the natural arrogance of New Yorkers who tend to think they own the planet. The Democratic Party’s problems are far bigger than New York. They begin on one end of Pennsylvania Avenue, and end on the other. As usual, most voters will be using the mid-term elections as a gut-check on their feelings about the current government. If the inept, cowardly and inert Mr. Obama needs someone to resign in order to save the party, that dude in the mirror with the big ol’ grin would be the most efficacious choice. Charlie Cook is now giving the Democrats only a fifty-fifty chance of retaining their majority in the House, which is now a whopping 79 seats. Man, you have to really work at it to blow something that badly in nine months time.

(Rather harsh......lets see what Obama does in the key domestic and foreign policy issues over the next few months, BEFORE the mid-term elections in 2010.......ONLY by then if he loses badly, and he hasn't made any fundamental policy changes which are clearly distinct from the BUSH II junta (where we know he could have made a difference, and had the capacity to do so, but deliberately stalled) can we begin to call him a dud presidency.......just another Jew front........blah blah blah.......a night watchman......before the Jew institutes a real fascist state in America in 2012 for Israel, under a loony right wing fruit cake.)

The second problem with asking Paterson to step out of the race to save Democratic majorities in Congress is that Obama has them already, in lopsided amounts, and he’s not doing a damn thing with them. Instead of kicking some butt to line his own caucuses up and forcing them to pass some real serious legislation that the president demands (see Bush, George W, for illustration. Also, Reagan, Ronald W.; Johnson, Lyndon B.; and Roosevelt, Franklin R.), this fool is doing deals with Republicans who are trying to destroy him, and the very predatory industries that are precisely the problem with American healthcare. I guess he must think that the GOP is just kidding. You know, like they were with Clinton. In any case, why worry about maintaining your majority if you have no intention of ever actually using it?

(In total agreement prof............could be to do with his age, inexperience...his feeling his way around in his new job, his racial background, dare I say it too dazed and grateful for being in the Whitehouse as a black guy. He really needs to implement his programs quickly, soon is not soon enough.......reverse the tax cuts to the rich; health care reform; Education reform and investment; Reform of the financial market; reform of the Byzantine American local and federal tax system; Immigration reform; pull troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan; get a grip on the REAL security budget of America, and cut it; Reform fundamentally the open free trade system of America....do you have something crap and third rate to sell? Then why not sell it to America?; Provides incentives for industry; reform the American media which is now effectively controlled by a few highly biased oligarchies linked to Jews; roll back the security police state instituted under Bush II....)

And the last reason that Obama is idiotic for meddling in state and local politics is because he was sent to Washington to save the country from the sixteen or so serious crises his predecessor bequeathed him, and about all he has going for him is the good will of the public who gave him the job. Spending your time dicking around with who should be the Democratic Party’s nominee for municipal dog-catcher is not exactly what people had in mind when they gave him this mandate. By going to Europe to beg for the Olympics, or by immersing himself in local politics, this chump is spending his political capital at a furious pace. It wouldn’t even be worth the effort if he was getting what he was asking for. But of course it’s far worse that both Paterson and the IOC slammed the door in his face, as publicly and as emphatically as imaginable. If Obama taped a “kick me” sign to his back, he could hardly signal any better his ineptitude and his willingness to get rolled at every conceivable opportunity.

(inexperience and his team?)

There’s more, of course. Another headline reports that “Panel Finishes Work on Health Bill Amendments”. The public option, already a weak sister to any real reform of the predatory wealth extraction system masquerading as national healthcare, was of course voted down by the Senate Finance Committee referred to in the title. Obama has yet to seriously weigh in on any preferences he might have. Apparently he is going to wait until the end of the legislation process. Assuming that he actually has any preferences – and I don’t, unless you count carrying water for corporate power and Wall Street – how astonishingly stupid is that as a strategy? After all the grief and months of effort Congress has gone through to maybe produce a bill, is it conceivable that they’d want to entertain some major new change at the last minute?

Then there’s Afghanistan, where the president has his own general running around painting him into a policy corner with only one option. Any military guy who tried that under Bush got summarily cashiered, even though they were actually telling the truth. You know, like maybe 160,000 GIs weren’t gonna be sufficient to occupy a country of 25 million pissed-off Iraqis. Say that and your career was over, Shinseki-style.

(Yes he needs to be more assertive with the military, and not be overawed by them. Either he cuts the military ops in Afghanistan and Iraq, which gives him loose change to finance his domestic programs....which avoids a recession.....which gives him a chance to be reelected in 2012, and not do badly in 2010......OR.....he substantively or wholly continues with BUSH II policies with marginal teflon tinkering on the periphery...with outlandish public debates dominated by "FUCK THE NEWS".....to give the impression he is actually doing something, when he actually is NOT)

Is anyone else sensing a pattern here?

(The "pattern' will be more patently obvious after the mid-term election results in 2010, and legislatively what he has actually achieved by then)

Obama would make a great nineteenth century president. You know, all those guys with names you can never remember, because they pretty much didn’t really do anything? Back in those days, Congress was king, and presidents – except during wartime – were essentially glorified clerks, executing the Congressional will, as per their Constitutional duty. That’s certainly one way to do it. It’s just that it pretty much isn’t what people have come to want and expect for the last century or so. And it sure as hell isn’t what Obama promised in the election.

(he would look out of place as a "nigger".........Seriously prof. the "decline" in the American constitutional set-up...over 100 years...distinctly beginning with Crypto-Jew Teddy Roosevelt embarking on the American quest for empire from 1898, and the subsequent inevitable road to imperial presidencies can't be blamed on Obama surely. Obama can chip away against that in his little way by disengaging from Afghanistan and Iraq, which he has the authority and choice to do)

But he has really specialized in being an acted-upon object, rather than a political protagonist, despite possessing the most powerful position in the world, commanding majorities in Congress, an initially adoring public wishing him tons of good will, and all manner of crises to warrant if not demand bold action. In his reticence he is not only carrying forward a fine Democratic Party tradition of recent decades, but in fact refining it into an art form. The pattern works like this: Republicans charge like bulls through china shops and grab the mantle of power, proceeding then to ram their program through, no matter the casualties. When they reach levels of greed, corruption and failure so excessive that even comatose Americans can no longer stand it, some effete Democratic stooge named Carter or Clinton or Obama is called in to hold down the fort long enough for the regressives to regroup and start the cycle again. But Obama in action – better rendered as ‘Obama’s inaction’ – makes Clinton look like a litter full of Mike Tysons crammed into an overheated pressure chamber by comparison.

(Beautiful......Democrats Presidents are angels hey? Carter.......Toppled the Shah of Iran 1979, and what the human cost for Iran has been since; began funding Islamic fundies in Afghanistan via Pakistan from July 1979; Toppled the democratically elected Bhutto regime in Pakistan 1977; sanctioned mass slaughter in South Korea in 1980, under/through military rule; South America I'm sure he did some nasty unsavory things there too..........Clinton.....Iraq/sanctions 500,000 children dead; Kosovo.......)

It’s astonishing how Democrats can never seem to block anything the hard-right wants to do, even when they have majorities, while the GOP kills everything the Democrats supposedly want, even with minuscule minorities in Congress. Gee, one could almost get the impression that Democrats don’t really want anything much different from Republicans, but just have to adopt a different alt-persona to hide their intentions from the public. Republicans use guns, god, gays and Gaddafi as distractions from corporate looting. Democrats strap on their cardigan sweaters and try really, really hard to do something, but gosh-darned it, just never seem to get anywhere.

(Reduced to its basic terms the two American parties are run by Jews which are used to ridicule and fool gentile Americans into thinking that they have a real choice, and a measure of say in the running of their country........which is not the case. In that sense the right/left political paradigm over which the professor is fuming about is non existent/fake/pied piper bullshit......is illusion....the only political paradigm which matters in America is the Jewish one, and the needs of Israel....when that reality hits gentile Americans, there will be revolution, and hence the instituting of the American security police state under Bush.......which Obama has not touched, or talked about rolling back/addressing....not one Congress sub-committee has touched that very important area....simple question you know, do Americans want to live in a Jew run security police state or not?)

As for our friend Mr. Obama, he seems busy unlearning every lesson of the last three decades. He doesn’t appear worried that the right will challenge his legitimacy as president ‘cause, of course, they never did that to Carter or Clinton. He doesn’t seem worried that they’ll happily destroy the country if necessary in order to wreck his presidency because, of course, there’s little precedent for that. He doesn’t much care to use the bully pulpit and strong-arm Congress to get what he wants because, of course, that never got Reagan or Bush anywhere.

(Jews operating in the Republican and Democratic party, in Wall Street, in the media could wreck the USA if they are allowed to..........They almost destroyed the $ in August/September 2008 before the emergency team in the BUSH II administration stepped in..........not many Americans are aware of this episode.The Democrats also play a vital enabler role to so called Republican bad guys.....its a elaborate Jew run double act/vaudeville )

I can’t believe I’d ever say this, but the question Obama should be asking right about now, is “What would Bush do?”

I’ll tell ya what. He’d jam his legislation down the throats of the other party, putting the fear of god in them if they dared to oppose the emperor. He’s rip people’s lungs out and stuff them back through their eye sockets if they looked at him cross-eyed. He’d lie to members of his own party and carpet bomb their entire home neighborhoods if they dared vote against him. If any media talking head didn’t tell the lies they were programmed to speak, he’d kidnap their kids and send them to Gitmo, treating them a good waterboarding for every one of their birthdays. And, he’d call in Rove to stomp some people good, the nice Republican way.

(Surely professor you are not seriously suggesting that the Barack Obama administration adopt the style and fashion of the criminally inept administration of Bush II;Katrina and all that; one of the worst in American history...........Having pure political convictions which have evolved over years of meditation and self learning, AND the requisite personal zeal to implement them onto the nation is one thing; working through the correct legal channels, and constitutional channels....HOWEVER using FALSE FLAG OPS IN AMERICA, and Mafia style MO in all areas to institute ones fundamental political objectives in the service of Likud Israel must be deemed ultimately as political "failure" and a moral "failure")

What would that look like? Here’s journalist Ron Suskind relating an inside taste of what he observed while waiting outside the Ol’ Karl’s office for an interview, back when he was running the White House political operation: “Rove was talking to an aide about some political stratagem in some state that had gone awry and a political operative who had displeased him. I paid it no mind and reviewed a jotted list of questions I hoped to ask. But after a moment, it was like ignoring a tornado flinging parked cars. ‘We will fuck him. Do you hear me? We will fuck him. We will ruin him. Like no one has ever fucked him!’ As a reporter, you get around—curse words, anger, passionate intensity are not notable events—but the ferocity, the bellicosity, the violent imputations were, well, shocking. This went on without a break for a minute or two. Then the aide slipped out looking a bit ashen, and Rove, his face ruddy from the exertions of the past few moments, looked at me and smiled a gentle, Clarence-the-Angel smile. ‘Come on in.’ And I did. And we had the most amiable chat for a half hour.”

(Yes I think American popular culture has glorified the MAFIA somewhat. When you are running a vast sophisticated 21st century modern country, working through the accepted channels is the best and only option...........if the actions of the Bush administration is exposed as criminal, then Rove would be termed a failure, and not an object lesson on how to get things done.)

Why won’t Obama do this? Why won’t he unleash all the powers at his disposal, knock heads together, and smash political opponents to smithereens in order to get his way? Two reasons. First, he wasn’t a complete personal screw-up for the last half century, acknowledged even by his own parents to be a total embarrassment. He therefore doesn’t have the burning need to show the world they’ve been wrong about him his whole life, like a certain other fellow recently seen roaming the halls of the West Wing.

The other reason is that Obama doesn’t actually appear to be doing anything that requires any particular toughness. He’s not trying to sell a bullshit war or dismantle Social Security, like Bush. He’s not trying to end legal and institutional racism in a country where it was as pervasive as bibles in ‘Bama, like Lyndon Johnson did. He’s not attempting to bring the country kicking and screaming into the twentieth century, even after it was already one-third over, like FDR was.

In fact, he doesn’t really appear to be doing much of anything, including producing the much-vaunted ‘change’ we heard endlessly about during last year’s campaign. Unless, of course, you count the nice demeanor with which he continues the predatory policies of Reagan, Clinton, and the Bushes. This is essentially George W. Bush’s third term. It’s Barry in the Bush with Smiles.

Obama more or less just seems to want to hang for a while, passively swaying in whatever winds happen to be blowing through at the moment. That might have worked in the 1950s, or even the 1970s, but not today. The brownshirts of the American right have been playing for keeps for some time now. And, while it’s true that they can be their own worst enemy in normal times, these are hardly normal times. Failing to address the real economic pain people are feeling, failing to provide remotely meaningful healthcare reform, failing to clean-up the corporate predators slamming the public with bad mortgages, sky-high credit card interest rates and bailouts of the already rich – all of these are an invitation for some change Obama can believe in, especially in 2012. If he insists on being a political object, the right will gladly turn him into one. It will be a freakin’ anvil too, not the fifth face on Mount Rushmore.

This is not kid’s stuff. These mobsters are possessed of insatiable greed, and they are clever beyond belief at mobilizing the anxieties and inadequacies of a public already dumbed-down to a level of political immaturity that can barely keep pace with the amped-up fires of their personal rage to which it’s dangerously coupled. How many re-run episodes of this mini-series do we need to see before we get clear on how it turns out?

The right is wrong on nearly everything, of course – the elites because they lie, and the shock troops because they’re frightened of their own shadows and therefore find blessed relief in every possible palliative from the pope to Palin. But they are correct about Obama being a complete patsy. They like to bring that up in the foreign policy context, because it’s good for scaring voters, and because it doesn’t remind moderates of just who is actually rolling this punk here at home (a very fine example of which was provided by the cheers that went up from our nice super-patriots when America lost the Olympics bid). But the truth is that a movement that should have been discredited to the point of annihilation by its very own actions is now instead setting the agenda in Washington, and the guy who won the landslide seems busy trying to push the mud back up the hill so that he can be buried by it himself, instead of the people who pretty much literally want to kill him.

(Yes, agreed Obama will need to make his choices soon, and quickly..........being a passive night watchman, who achieved very little, where he could have otherwise with executive ease, will be an inglorious legacy for him which will haunt him for the rest of his life. He simply cannot run America with defacto 4 more years of BUSH II policies. Either he challenges these policies FUNDAMENTALLY, as a Democrat with radical political roots, or he faces the consequences from 2010....and then into 2012 .)

I really don’t know what to say or think about this dude anymore. The way democracy is supposed to work is that his desire to hold office and the public’s preference for certain policies should reinforce each other and impel us toward a mutually satisfying presidency. Instead, though, he trucks along seemingly oblivious to the fact that the exact opposite is occurring.

This country is sinking in every way imaginable, and he will be held to blame in 2010 and 2012.

And so he should be.

It’s just that that will also mean the return of the monster set, absolutely foaming at the mouth after four years in the wilderness not holding the presidency to which they believe they’re fully entitled to own.

And then Obama will join Clinton, running around the world making speeches and writing books. Maybe they’ll even do joint appearances.

Errrum no! Clinton despite the Jewish organized blowjob, ran a two term presidency, where the economy did very well, with good employment rates........Barack Hussain Obama on the other hand, if the economy tanks during his watch, serving just one term will not be forgiven by the majority of American public, with large numbers unemployed................then he will be reminded of his Muslim name, birth certificate, and racial background in very nasty unkind terms......he will disappear from the limelight naturally, into Chicago maybe if they have him back, or Hawaii, or Indonesia, or Kenya.............exceptionally high hopes have been raised in the American public, and he must deliver....or else......The security acts passed under Bush weren't instituted to fight "al-Qaeda" prof. if you know what I mean......The security legislation instituted in America by Bush II aren't being used against "al-Qaeda" on a adaily basis)

Thanks for that, Barack. You’re a real patriot.

Oh well. At least you got the important stuff right.

You won’t have ruffled any feathers while being president.

_________________________

David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University in New York. He is delighted to receive readers' reactions to his articles (dmg@regressiveantidote.net), but regrets that time constraints do not always allow him to respond. More of his work can be found at his website, www.regressiveantidote.net.

Can't make a silk purse out of a Mcsow's years.

It is at times like this that the rational Republicans will be reminiscing about how things could have been if Ron Paul had been given a chance, as the candidate for President of America. But still I suppose policies around Israel trumps all else. The teenage girlie like crush for Israel, trumps all other considerations I suppose, and such a policy is both touching and intriguing (maybe the pimp whore relationship is a better analogy).

























Whats wrong with picking complete compliant idiots as President of America who does Israel's bidding? America believe it or not is the richest, most powerful, most complicated and sophisticated country in the world. Leaving aside the requirement to have some basic skills of administration, to become president of such a country also requires formidable skills, surrounded by formidable people (as in well above average).

The Jew in the Republican's think that electing clowns like Bush and ,McCain who listen to their orders is enough to run America...........................WRONG! Its one thing being the Mafia appointed manager of a Mafia front company who is focused on laundering and looting national funds the easiest greasiest way possible, and quite another actually "running" America as President, with a clear set of policies, which have a sound philosophical base. NOT as it is now, ad hoc improvisation of anything and everything chaos, to keep oneself, and ones friends in power for as long as possible.

Criminals focused on criminality don't make good presidents, not even for a small manageable country like Zimbabwe.

So the current situation unfolds in a farcical manner, as you cannot determine every syllable of the clowns actions, and invariably they show themselves in their true form sooner or later. No amount of clever tricks can hide this basic fact, not even through your control of the media.

When you elect clowns, who then create a total mess, then you must find truly capable people to rectify the situation later when the situation has gone well past the South.

The Democrats in that sense have been more sensible, electing a candidate who outwardly seems more with it, and intellectually far more capable. Maybe by this the Jews have decided already who their candidate for President will be 2008. They have maliciously and deviously squeezed out a worthwhile gentile prospective VP, John Edwards with irrelevant muck raking of an extra marital affair (gadzooks Mr. Abernathy, what is the world coming to!), and installed one of their own, Mr. Biden, who seems more agreeable than the likes of Lieberman or Richard Perle or an Wolfowitz.



So if Obama steps out of line, as their elected puppet and he suddenly finds his conscience with common sense for the best interests of America (Ron Paul, Mike Gravel, Mckinney.........), they can remove him and install Biden as President.

And therein lies the fundamental problem for America, electing a real credible candidate with some basic residual skills for administration who is not beholden to Israel, and its set of anti-American policies and veto's. Under Obama as President, this fact will become only more obvious, and I assume.............some type of conflict will ensue in the future, within that wonderful country, when this contradiction of national interests becomes all too apparent to average Americans.

Both parties are a problem; The system is a problem

I am not sure that the Democrats are the real and only problem Mike. They certainly are part of the problem, and are a vital part of the MIC that is devouring America and the rest of the world. Without this important cog, the war wheel of America couldn't function..........so yes they are central to the current mess America is in, but they are not the only problem.

Essentially the Democratic party is a tool and vehicle for a certain elite who 'use it' for their agenda's. Disband and take this tool way, and all that will happen is that the elite of America will find another vehicle to pursue their agenda's.

In that sense given the power of the real masters of the Democratic party it cannot be fixed. It can never be made to follow the true wishes of ordinary Americans. There is no hope for the Democratic party, and there never was.

1) The real question is, at what point sufficient number of Americans become antagonized with the 'American democratic system' and rebel against it meaningfully---significantly. What triggers it.

2) What do the majority do to articulate their will meaningfully (organizationally), after realizing that the two party system of America is a sham.......an elaborate hoax that is rapidly losing its credibility with ordinary Americans who cognitively recognize the reality of living in America.........contrasted with what the politicians are telling them.

3) How the elite reacts to suppress the will of the majority of Americans. The facts show that the elite will not simply roll over and surrender---------they have money, power, security......and the world is a big place........they can simply leave America if the situation gets too hot for them. They don't mean to change course, which is suitable for the average American. Instead it is a continuation of the same policies and bright ideas....there are no real 'Grand Canyon' differences between the two parties on most substantive issues....but that is something which you should have noticed by now. They mean to stick to their policies and sell them in as many different ways as they can, like any carpet bagger salesman, with third rate wares.

When the tipping point of tolerance goes South from the majority, then there is always the fall back of instituting a full security police state al a comrade Kim. The laws, and the state mechanisms have been built up gradually from the Clinton administration........reaching a crescendo under Bush, but of course these things were planned decades ago.



The secret gulags in America that can hold upwards of 20 million people; the vast security structure; the intrusive prodding of ordinary Americans in their everyday lives.....the militarization of the society...........the super bowl security spectacle........the color coded alerts......war..war and more war. Are these government actions to protect Americans or to control them?

As an individual who has a personal understanding of these things................more than the average person........then I must tell you that all this security spectacle has very little to do with protecting America from a Phantom organization run by the West, 'al-Qaeda' and its long dead leader. In fact this is all about controlling Americans when they get really troublesome.........and when ordinary Americans don't buy the repetition of the hoax of 1929 which was artificially instituted back then. When the rage fly's. When ordinary Americans realize they have been had by a bunch of smooth, 'talking points', super criminals......Americans then won't be like the savings and loans victims of the early eighties........or the embarrassed hapless victims of the early 1930's...it will be different.

You have pure unadulterated criminals running your country, and I don't mean by that George, Hilary or the other leading politicians. These are after all mere fronts. The behavior of your armed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and I assume they take their orders from higher ups, were and are pure criminal. Only a bunch of perverse crooks could behave this way towards two consecutive nations. Add to that the false flag of 9/11 the pivotal point of all this......then America and its ordinary people have serious problem of a dangerous criminal class running the country and Americans are at their mercy.......and the Soviet style laws....the secret gulags........and the particular types of seriously shady people with questionable back grounds manning the key departments......where all this is going does not bode well for the future, for ordinary Americans.


















In that sense your arguments about the Democrats is a little esoteric, in the full context of what I am taking about.......The Democrats were and are part of an illusion, a grand illusion. Thats why 60% of Americans who could theoretically vote don't (includes 22% unregistered)-----only 40% of Americans vote in Presidential elections........is that a democracy? Vast majority of Americans refuse to participate in the charade of American Presidential elections.

This is why the approval rating for Congress recently is around 9%, worse than Bushes approval rating of around 27%, and sliding daily. And this is why these Congress people held a secret closed door meeting in March 2008 to talk about the collapse of the American economy, because of their misrule, and what are the likely consequences..........and how to manage the average American when it all goes pear shaped.

This is not to say that these beings are all powerful, or even know what they are doing.............a lot of them are quite stupid.....in the normal sense.......and unimpressive individuals and humans who through their families........invariably involving criminal activity, now, half a decade ago or even a century ago became very rich...and powerful.

Criminals, even super criminals invariably for some reason are poor managers of nations since their minds are preoccupied with 'other' things. Then you have America, which is the richest, and possibly the most sophisticated nation on earth...........managing such a state for such criminal elements for eternity will be extremely difficult......and there lies the hope. The middle class of America that is decent and righteous must boycott the mainstream parties, and must find their own avenue of expressing their political will, with the help of the working class.
People with integrity that will remain stead fast to the true cause and not switch because they have been groped by AIPAC with a few shekels, amd mesmerized by the illusion of their power.

________________________________________

The Democrats Are The Real Problem

By Mike Whitney

20/07/08 "ICH" -- -- Obama's candidacy is over; kaput. He's already stated that he has no intention of stopping the war, so he has disqualified himself. That's his prerogative; no one put a gun to his head. His op-ed in Monday's New York Times just removes any lingering doubt about the matter. What Obama proposes is moving the central theater of operation from Iraq to Afghanistan. Big deal. Why is it more acceptable to kill a man who is fighting for his country in Afghanistan than in Iraq?

It's not; which is why Obama must be defeated and the equivocating Democratic Party must be jettisoned altogether. The Democrats are a party of blood just like the Republicans, they're just more discreet about it. That's why people who are serious about ending the war have to support candidates outside the two-party charade. The Democrat/Republican duopoly will not deliver the goods; it's as simple as that. The point is to stop the killing, not to provide blind support for smooth-talking politicos who try to mask their real intentions. Obama made his choice, now he can suffer the consequences.

Nancy Pelosi is a perfect example of what the Democrats are all about. Just look at the way she brushed aside the people who got her elected. They mean nothing to her. In a matter of months, the "San Francisco liberal" has achieved what former-Speaker of the House Hastert could only dream of; she's driven the Congress' public approval ratings into single digits for the first time in history making her the worst speaker of all time. She rubber-stamped the FISA bill, concealed what she knew about the CIA's global torture programs, and vowed to stop any public effort to hold the administration accountable for its war crimes. (No impeachment) She has betrayed her most ardent supporters and singlehandedly transformed an already-emasculated congress into a purely ceremonial body incapable of doing the people's work.

At least Bush never betrayed any of his supporters. Never. Pelosi is worse than Bush, much worse.

And yet, liberals still insist that we should vote the Democratic ticket. In your dreams!

What leftist or progressive is not totally fed-up with the Democrats cagey "bait-and-switch" hypocrisy? Voting the Democratic ticket is not a sign of "hope"; it's a sign of being a schmuck. The Democrats have done nothing to stop the war and will do nothing to stop the war. The Obama candidacy is merely a way to replace one group of genocidal maniacs with another. Who needs a charismatic, flannel-mouth glamor boy to lead us into battle when a senile fogy with "anger management" issues will do just fine.

Voters of conscience should reject that choice altogether. Just as they should reject the "lesser of two evils" theory which does not apply when ordinance is being dumped daily on innocent civilians. It has to stop.

Obama is not an antiwar candidate, that is merely a fiction maintained by his public relations team. In fact, he wants to beef up the military with 65,000 additional ground forces and 27,000 more marines. He's also stated that he will add “two additional combat brigades to Afghanistan” and encourage NATO to make “greater contributions—with fewer restrictions”. In his op-ed he boasted, "As president, I will make the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban the top priority that it should be. This is a war that we have to win.”

He also added this ominous warning:

“The greatest threat to that security lies in the tribal regions of Pakistan, where terrorists train and insurgents strike into Afghanistan. We cannot tolerate a terrorist sanctuary, and as president, I won’t. We need a stronger and sustained partnership between Afghanistan, Pakistan and NATO to secure the border, to take out terrorist camps and to crack down on cross-border insurgents. We need more troops, more helicopters, more satellites, more Predator drones in the Afghan border region. And we must make it clear that if Pakistan cannot or will not act, we will take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights.”

OBAMA; THE CANDIDATE FOR ESCALATION

Obama supporters should take their candidate at his word. What he is proposing is a dramatic escalation and expansion of the war into another sovereign country. How is this consistent with the demands of his base or the millions of Americans who believe that Obama represents real change.

It's time for a reality check; the Democrats are the real problem not the Republicans. If the path to peace requires crushing the Democratic Party and its blood-thirsty candidates; so be it. The main thing is to stop the killing. If Obama won't do it; we'll find someone who will?

President Barack Hussain Obama

The problem with Obama is that he is part of the establishment, and a member of the CFR, which is linked to and an instrument of the Rothschild's of London.

He is funded by George SOROS, and advised by 'The Grand Chessboard' Brzezinski; the one who with President Carters backing in 1979 began covert funding of seriously weird Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan (Gulbuddin Hekmatyar) via Pakistan's ISI from July 1979 (not Ahmad Shah Masood as the Charlie Wilson Hollywood film suggests according to reviews---a mere instrument), and over throwing the Shah of Iran in 1979, and installing fundamentalists there, with British backing.

Yes a nice impressionable intelligent youngish black man (front--but for who?) making it big in America is somewhat romantic to the gullible senses, but will his Presidency be really good for 300 million Americans?

The answer I am afraid most emphatically is that he will not help matters in the USA. America is in a very serious situation, in which one carefully groomed candidate of the usual suspects will not be able to rectify the enormous mess. Its about making fundamental policy shifts and the will to do so, and not about charismatic leadership. No amount of Jewish vaudeville charisma can save America with her present set of failed policies abroad and home.

Under his possible presidency, there may be minor twigs of policy changes which may differentiate his administration from Bush, but given his covert backing mentioned above, nothing spectacularly different.

His 3rd January Iowa victory speech is quite instructive, beyond mere slogans:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tydfsfSQiYc

The problem is that he doesn't address the core issue of GWOT which was started by a false flag op by elements of the Pentagon beholden to Israel and other Israeli security assets, which is designed to continue for several decades if not a century permanent war against Muslim countries, with on going operations largely as a scheme to create an empire for Israel.

The whole concept is shoddy and silly, and will ultimately harm America and Israel the most. Why can't the whole of humanity just busy themselves with everyday aspirations, instead of trying to create empires at this late stage in human history----empires are out of fashion, or didn't the Zionists not get this.

His victory speech does not address that core issue, and does not answer what he will do about America's imperial war on Israel's behalf---------the only concession he makes, as an establishment politician is that he might vaguely in the future stop operations in one theater, namely Iraq after he becomes President. Which means American troops will be out of Iraq by mid 2010 if his promises are to be believed. But even this small promise must be taken with a pinch of salt, since as a 'political establishment insider' who can be certain that he won't turn around and say:

''My fellow Americans, after speaking with the Joints Chiefs of Staff, and after consulting my National Security Advisor, AIPAC, Soros, Brzezinski, Mr. Lieberman my mentor and of course ISRAEL our dear and only friend, I have decided to stay the course. You know bro, the reality of power thang. Thank you, and have a nice day won't you."

He intends to prosecute GWOT with renewed vigor, but has he ever considered that GWOT was fake from the beginning, with specific objectives for the perpetrators, namely turning America into a dictatorial police state that will do the grunt work for Israel for several decades, with no questions asked, and if there are questions asked, several KBR concentration camps, and legislation is in place to put the objecting parties into where they belong.

As an alleged real authentic former Civil Rights lawyer he talks about reinstating Habeus Corpus, and the abolition of Guantanamo. From a fellow lawyer this looks awfully like window dressing to please/fool some of the masses with gestures, whilst leaving the fundamental instruments of state repression in place, namely the Patriot Act and a whole host of other acts that were slided in after 9/11. If you don't get rid of the Patriot Act and other security acts you sir are basically following the same policies as Bush II.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19002.htm

If you are thus still continuing an ill defined indefinite war, which costs the treasury billions if not trillions, where the Zionist lobby decides who is the new target of America, then how do you deliver on all the domestic promises that you have made? No can do.

The only way the American economy can be rectified and the working and Middle classes satisfied significantly is if the false GWOT war is immediately halted and foreign military bases and commitments stopped. When American government attention is fully focused where it is needed most. The one is linked to the other.

But he got one thing right beyond the frothy empty soundbites. He recognised the urgency of the situation, and that something has to be done in relation to American government policies, or its the abyss.

In this light as a collective establishment insider group, Clinton, McCain, Romney, Huckabee, Thompson, Edwards and Obama are not the saviours America is looking for right now.