.
.
.
.
Zombies? Dead people moving inside body bags after "Russian BUCA massacre"
USA style Crisis Actors.
Ghouta, Syria Chemical attack by Assad 2.0. Rush to judgement and punish the perp before the evidence is in.
Allegations of false flag attack at Ghouta (2013)
Assad had no motivation to kill his own people, and for the world to see.
The attacks prompted some U.S. intelligence officials to speculate they were carried out by the opposition in order to draw the West into the war,[151] a concept dismissed by others.[152][153] Other experts and officials questioned whether the government was responsible based on the timing of the attack, just after the UN Mission had arrived in Damascus, and lack of motivation, since the government was advancing in the area.[154][155]
In December 2013, Seymour Hersh wrote in the London Review of Books (LRB) that a former intelligence official told him that in the days before and after the attack, sensors notifying U.S. intelligence agencies of Syrian chemical weapons deployment did not activate, and that a senior intelligence consultant told him that the U.S. president's Morning Report on 20–22 August contained no information about an impending government chemical weapons attack.[156] In the article, Hersh related that a former senior U.S. intelligence official told him that the U.S. government's published assessment of the incident included an account of the sequence the Syrian military would have followed for any chemical attack, rather than intercepts specifically relating to the Ghouta attacks.[156][157][158]
In April 2014 Hersh wrote an article, also published by the LRB, reporting that a former intelligence officer told him that the attacks were "covert action planned by Erdoğan’s people to push Obama over the red line", speculating about Turkish government support for Al-Qaeda affiliate Al-Nusra Front's attempts to access sarin.[159][160][161][157][162][163] Hersh's argument received some support,[164][165][166] but was dismissed by other commentators.[167][168][169][170][171][172] The US and Turkish governments denied the accuracy of Hersh's article.[173]
The attacks prompted some U.S. intelligence officials to speculate they were carried out by the opposition in order to draw the West into the war,[151] a concept dismissed by others.[152][153] Other experts and officials questioned whether the government was responsible based on the timing of the attack, just after the UN Mission had arrived in Damascus, and lack of motivation, since the government was advancing in the area.[154][155]
In December 2013, Seymour Hersh wrote in the London Review of Books (LRB) that a former intelligence official told him that in the days before and after the attack, sensors notifying U.S. intelligence agencies of Syrian chemical weapons deployment did not activate, and that a senior intelligence consultant told him that the U.S. president's Morning Report on 20–22 August contained no information about an impending government chemical weapons attack.[156] In the article, Hersh related that a former senior U.S. intelligence official told him that the U.S. government's published assessment of the incident included an account of the sequence the Syrian military would have followed for any chemical attack, rather than intercepts specifically relating to the Ghouta attacks.[156][157][158]
In April 2014 Hersh wrote an article, also published by the LRB, reporting that a former intelligence officer told him that the attacks were "covert action planned by Erdoğan’s people to push Obama over the red line", speculating about Turkish government support for Al-Qaeda affiliate Al-Nusra Front's attempts to access sarin.[159][160][161][157][162][163] Hersh's argument received some support,[164][165][166] but was dismissed by other commentators.[167][168][169][170][171][172] The US and Turkish governments denied the accuracy of Hersh's article.[173]
