Civilian Control of the Pakistan military, but NOT by this government.

.
.
.
.
How does a thief ask a well armed murderer, who is part funded by a foreign power to listen to the thief's orders and behave?

It is not possible. More than likely given the intrinsic animal behavior of humans that the murderer will end up controlling the thief, by hook and crook methods (the job description of the ISI)............I am familiar with these types of people, how they think and how they operate for over two decades.....their little faggotty games.

The Pakistan military as with many banana republic military's is a law unto itself, which has been considerably courted and rewarded by gora sahib JEWSA since 1954, and by Bilaat Sahib since 1947. The Pakistan military operates for itself, and for gora sahib whose geo-strategic orders the Pakistan military has carried out both covertly and overtly in Pakistan, South Asia, West Asia and in the Gulf where they protect many of the Arab states.

Its a bit ironical and rich therefore, that the Pakistan military should charge powerless puppet of the USA, Zardari bhen, with conspiring against the state, when in REALITY the Pakistan military is the biggest national threat, and treacherous tool against the fundamental interests of Pakistan.

Its a bit ironical and rich also, that the Pakistan military should charge powerless puppet of the USA, Zardari bhen, with conspiring against the state, when it is the Pakistani military which killed Zardari's wife in a highly ritualized way, and then brought unpopular liked by nobody political nonentity Zardari into power through the services of the ISI. Thinking, hoping, and calculating that the Pakistan military could easily control such a man. But even a thief has ambitions, and some dignity.

As this episode shows Zardari cannot bite his masters hand in the process of gaining permanent power in Pakistan. The USA will not do anything that which is uncertain to undermine one of its most valuable assets in Asia, which incidentally has been rewarded with a favorable status with NATO. You have to do decades of long hard gora JEWSA ass kissing to be given such a title. Zardari has no political base in Pakistan even, within the rest of the non-military society of Pakistan. Zardari has no gifts to offer Pakistan, besides being married to Benazir Bhutto, and known as Mr. 10%.

From such a weak position of political reality, to take on the Pakistan military was always a foolish proposition.

The idea of controlling the military by civilian governments EFFECTIVELY is universally good. We only have to look at North Korea and the JEWSA to see what an out of control military can do to society generally.

The idea of controlling ones own military through the hoped for cooperation of a foreign power is out right dangerous and traitorous.......Mir Jafar/Mir Sadiq.

That Zardari should seek to stay in power for ever through the good offices of the JEWSA is absurd. He is an utter failure as president, and this FACT should be faced and realized. 90% of Pakistanis hate Zardari. Zardari's clownish performance as President isn't going to improve with a guaranteed backing of the malicious JEWSA. The country's situation isn't going to improve with Zardari at the helm permanently.

Zardari and his nefarious kleptocracy must go soon. But who will replace him?

Imran Khan, with his ex-Jewish wife and two Jewish sons (David Headley), with the backing of the Pakistan military? He has a stronger character, is Punjabi and of the right stock, but.........he is a product of the West where he gives his soundbites, meets his social circles when out of the country and HAS NEVER HAD POWER IN PAKISTAN BEFORE, save his one parliamentary seat. If by some Hitlerian miracle he should come to power with the backing of the ISI, he's going to be manipulated and played by the Pakistani military given his political naivety.

There after Imran Khan will be interviewed by David Frost, the preferred confession box of the favored Anglicized Pakistani elite, where just two years into power he will have a sorry look, haggled by the all powerful military, with no real power in Pakistan..........certainly not in defense and security, and certainly not in foreign policy. Just another civilian front for the chaudi chutia chamar chamcha coolie Pakistan military.

___________________________

Pakistan DM: No Govt Control Over Army Operations

Admission Comes in Letter to Supreme Court

by Jason Ditz, antiwar.com

A letter from the Pakistani Defense Ministry today to the Supreme Court admits that the government has lost all control over the operations of both the Army and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency.

The letter was issued in relation to the coup memo, in which Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari is said to have sought US military aid in ousting the Pakistani military leadership, promising to replace them with more pro-US officials.

Pakistan’s military says the letter, which was confirmed delivered to Admiral Michael Mullen, is authentic, and they insist it is an effort to undermine morale in the military and drive a wedge between the public and the Army.

The Defense Ministry had been sought to comment on the dispute, but is attempting to beg off with the statement, saying they don’t have any power over the military at any rate. The civilian government has insisted the memo is a forgery by some unseen force aimed at creating a scandal.

Zardari hiding

.
.
.
.
Zardari bhen hides.

He hides for many reasons.

He hides because 90% of Pakistanis don't want him running Pakistan as President.

He hides because he wants to use the USA military to increase his power, so that he can win a second term using American power and backing.

He hides because he is looting the country, worth over $4 billion into Western banks.

Other politicians declare their assets in public, but Zardari bhen hides his assets, because they were gained through criminality.

Zardari bhen strangely calls the very same opposition politicians criminal seditionists when they make legitimate all too obvious criticisms of him.

Rallies themselves won't topple the USA backed Zardari government, but as the CIA backed "Arab Spring' shows they are an important precursor to.......

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Does the Supreme Court have their eye on the ball?

.
.
.
.




Does the Pakistan Supreme Court have their eye on the ball? Are they really doing their job? A major plank of their work, as is the case with most Supreme Courts around the world is to act as the Guardians and Custodians of the Pakistani constitution.



The Swat Taliban deal with the Pakistani central government is unconstitutional:

• Under the 1973 Constitution, Fundamental Rights include security of person, safeguards as to arrest and detention, prohibition of slavery and forced labour, freedom of movement, freedom of association, freedom of speech, freedom to profess religion and safeguards to religious institutions, non-discrimination in respect of access to public places and in service, preservation of languages, script and culture.


• The judiciary enjoys full supermacy over the other organs of the state.


• Preamble: "Therein shall be guaranteed fundamental rights, including equality of status, of opportunity and before law, social, economic and political justice, and freedom of thought, expression, belief, faith, worship and association, subject to law and public morality".


• Wherein the integrity of the territories of the Federation, its independence and all its rights, including its sovereign rights on land, sea and air, shall be safeguarded;So that the people of Pakistan may prosper and attain their rightful and honoured place amongst the nations of the World and make their full contribution towards international peace and progress and happiness of humanity.


• Dedicated to the preservation of democracy achieved by the unremitting struggle of the people against oppression and tyranny;


• Inspired by the resolve to protect our national and political unity and solidarity by creating an egalitarian society through a new order;


• Do hereby, through our representatives in the National Assembly, adopt, enact and give to ourselves, this Constitution."

• The Nizam-i-Adle agreement surely goes against the fundamental concepts of the Pakistani constitution.......or do I not know what I am talking about constitutionally, legally or morally.
  

The situation around the deal, after the deal is agreed is rapidly becoming unconstitutional:

• The armed invasion of neighboring areas, is unconstitutional.


• The expulsion of other political groups from their area of control is unconstitutional.


• The confiscation of private property from lawful owners, and its redistribution without following proper sale of property procedures, is unconstitutional.


• The mobilisation of additional private militia fighters of all backgrounds without the approval of the state security apparatus, is unconstitutional.


• The imposition of a specific type of religious ideology, to the detriment of other sects of the Muslim faith, is unconstitutional........and even against the basic tenets of the Koran.


• The open arms offered to OBL, and Mullah Omer with their armed cohorts to come into the area of Swat Taliban control is unconstitutional.


• The complete obstruction and standing of the existing security forces, and especially the local Police, is unconstitutional.


• The vandalism and destruction of private property without offering any type of compensation, is unconstitutional.


• Creating fear and anarchy so that large number of people flee from the area under their control, is unconstitutional.


• Exhorting others in the rest of Pakistan to follow their example, through an unlicensed medium, is unconstitutional.


• Making the Pakistani military seem totally irrelevant and impotent.


• Denying women and girls their full rights, as guaranteed under the 1973 constitution.


• Protection of minorities, both religious and sectarian.

What does the Supreme Court have to say about this whole unconstitutional mess? Will they wait until the Taliban arrive at the gates of the Supreme Court and kick them out of their irrelevant positions? Will they release more fundie hardliners in time for the Taliban's coronation in Islamabad?

But surely the Pakistan parliament, the noble representatives of the people voted unanimously in favor of the deal, so how can the Supreme Court go against such a decision? Well Parliaments in the majority have been known to make mistakes, for example the House of Senate and representatives in the USA, and their support for Bush II and the wholly illegal Iraq war and ditto Westminster with Blair.

In such serious situations whether through the application of its writ and law, or through the formulation of opinion it is the duty of the Pakistani Supreme Court to point out the obvious unconstitutional implications of the recent Swat deal, and the even more obvious unconstitutional implications of what is unfolding in and around Swat. If they are not sure, they could hire first year law students from Peshawar University to guide them.