May 15, 2020

China and Russia are against further INHUMAN sanctions against the people of Iran

.
.
.
.

In the 1970's Rothschilds Britain initiated and sponsored Islamic Fundamentalism through the Globalist Carter administration of the USA from 1977 for several reasons:

1. The British Empire already had ample experience of destroying societies using religious movements (India, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran)

2. The new Islamic fundamentalists now backed by the American Empire would be used to destroy Communism and Communist movements in 57 Muslim countries.

3. The Islamic fundamentalists would be used to destroy the Soviet Union with its very large Muslim population inside the country and defeat Communism.

4.  The CIA trained Islamic Fundamentalists would provide Israel the cassus belli to wage war against several countries with 'Islamic fundamentalists'.....with USA supplied weapons and manpower backup (which later developed into actual DIRECT USA participation in 7 countries)....and make Israel appear pretty in the eyes of the world.(Western-style liberalism versus Medieval religious fundamentalism and irrationality)

The Eternal Jew (1940 film) - Wikipedia

and so the present American administration pursues Iran with hostility, a CIA installed puppet regime, at the behest of an extremist messianic Israeli party led by war criminals.

This has very little to do with American interests.

Removing and destabilising the CIA puppet Shah, and installing the mullahs 1977-1979 had very little to do with American interests.

We call these policies GLOBALISTS POLICIES, that makes very little sense.

___________________________________



China Rejects US Talk of Sanctioning Iran at UN


Chinese mission: US has no right to trigger snapback

US plans to try to extend an arms embargo on Iran at the UN, and potentially to try to force a snapback of sanctions are being rejected by other UN Security Council permanent members, with China now joining Russia in rejecting the idea.

China’s UN mission issued a statement saying that the US had failed to meet its obligations under the Iran nuclear deal in the first place, and “has no right to extend an arms embargo on Iran, let alone to trigger a snapback.”

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has argued that the US is still technically part of the nuclear deal despite never meeting its sanctions relief obligations and then withdrawing from the deal years ago. The goal is to claim the US can still reimpose sanctions under the deal despite not being truly part of the deal.

Russia is planning to sell Iran defensive arms once the embargo lifts later in 2020, and would certainly prevent its extension. China too now seems set to veto any attempt at snapback sanctions, and while Pompeo has said the US will do this however they can, it doesn’t seem like they have an obvious legal avenue for any of this.