.
.
.
America tells India that the USA will make India into a superpower.....and then proceeds to without an iota of irony and hypocrisy, actively fund, arm and support the live border foe of India, Pakistan and its security apparatus to the tune of billions of $.
The notorious ISI is funded by the USA........through which the 'al-CIA-duh' hologram was created.
The idea that the USA will make India into a great power is ludicrous, given the Neocon/Zionist written PNAC 2000 policy paper. Full Spectrum Dominance for the Jew, and no rivals to the USA accepted.....except China (The Rothschilds little hobby horse....AN ISSUE with which I have no problems, SINCERELY IF THINGS keep developing out of China as they do presently......"a RESPONSIBLE ASIAN SUPER=POWER" that helps Developing nations, and maintains the primacy of International Law, UPHOLDS 21st century international business norms........AND is an alternative viable center of power which developing nations especially can turn to for assistance)
What has the USA done for India except dump mountains of surplus food from the 1950--1990's as aid.
Participated in no strategic projects in the country.......arms and munitions factories, power plants, chemical plants, machine tools, metal works, iron and steel mills, heavy engineering.
Bumping off of high profile scientists in India, and enticing--SIPHONING off of 50,000 of the brightest and best engineers and scientists to work in the backroom of the USA.
Terrorism in India with Israel/Pakistan and RSS elements.
Buying elements of the media in India including Bollywood.
People constantly talk about American jobs off-shored to China and India. But the figures speak differently for the latter country.
Indian trade with the USA is a poultry $70 billion for 2014.........whereas China/USA trade is worth over $600 billion. And where are the millions of jobs off-shored in IT from the USA to India.....VERY LITTLE:
i) Major items of export from India to US
Select major items with their percentage shares, are given below.
a) Textiles (15.7%)
b) Precious stones & metals (20.9%)
c) Mineral Fuel, Oil (10.9%)
d) Pharmaceutical products (10.8%)
e) Organic chemicals (4.9%)
f) Machinery (4.9%)
g) Electrical Machinery (3%)
h) Lac, Gum, Resins (2.9%)
ii) Major items of export from US to India
Select major items with their percentage shares, are given below
a) Precious stones & metals (24.4%)
b) Aircraft, spacecraft, Parts (12%)
c) Machinery (9.8%)
d) Electrical machinery (6.5%)
e) Mineral Fuel, Oil etc (6.3%)
f) Optical instruments & equipment (6%)
h) Organic chemicals (3.4%)
g) Plastic Products (3.2%)
India's very small trade volume of about $340 billion exports of 2014, is not made up of huge numbers of jobs off-shored from the USA.......in IT, and call centers. In the Silicon Valley 34% of the workers are Indian.......where the USA sucks in expertise from India, AND not India sucking out jobs from the USA.
But the MAIN POINT which is being made is that without any serious assistance to the Indian economy and trade with the USA, the USA feels it has the right to express displeasure against India for signing MUCH NEEDED AND VERY IMPORTANT FOR INDIA strategic agreements with Russia worth $100 billion recently.
The USA feels entitled to many things.....no doubt as the exceptional nation, but this takes the cake.
The USA on the orders of the London based Rothschilds is silent on the 10 times bigger and of more significance, Russo-China trade agreements covering gas and oil. Or the even more significant currency swap agreements between both the countries.....in their local currency. Defacto a step in the merging of the two economies...where the Chinese economy leads.
For India to OBEY and jump how high sir, the USA will have to do a lot more then MERE lecture condescendingly in a racist double standard way to India. Faggot right-wing Modi comes from the premiere business state in India. Modi was a child-businessman before he became a political fascist apparatchik, and then a politician:
"I think pro-business mentality comes to Gujaratis from way long before even Europeans or Mughals invaded India. One reason for that is its geographical presence,it is a state of a shape in peninsula over Arabian ocean which has largest coast in India and had shortest sea route to Arab countries, Africa and Europe. The trade between India and other geographical areas mentioned had been in existence over a long long time, until Mughal countries started war in Arabian sea against Europeans (He means the Turkic Ottomans....and the Turkic Mughals). Thats why they had to find a new way to India (It is also an unverified story of Vasco d' gama meeting a Gujarati trader 'kanha' in Africa and followed him to India.) Back in time there might be huge population of traders who did business with other countries through Arabian sea from Gujarat that have created huge business minded population and grew sense of trading. (Don't believe me? Notice the power of a Gujarati to bargain price in the market next time.)"
___________________________________________
Antwerp: Where Gujjus beat Jews
If there is one place where the legendary business acumen of Jews and Gujaratis clashes,it is Antwerps diamond trading hub.And so far,Gujaratis have come up trumps,says Melvyn Thomas
When a small-time diamond merchant from Palanpur,Mafatlal Mohanbhai Mehta,left the Indian shores for Antwerp in Belgium in 1959,little did he knew that the Gujarati community would one day dominate the diamond business in this foreign land.At 21,Mehta had a knack for sniffing out new business opportunities.In Belgium,the Jews had monopolised the diamond trade.Mehta got into their good books and soon set up two companies.
.
Today,five decades later,the Mehtas and Shahs of the diamond industry control more than 75 per cent of the $42 billion annual diamond trade in Antwerp. In fact,if you bump into someone in Antwerp,there is a very good possibility that he is either a Shah or a Mehta.Today,Gujaratis are also making their presence felt in the diamond hubs of Tel Aviv and New York.
Thirty years ago,opening a diamond trading office in Antwerp was a must for each of the big diamond company owners in India.Gradually,following the footsteps of the Palanpuri Jains,Kathiawaris from Saurashtra too opened their trading offices in Antwerp.
In the last few years,Kathiawaris have established a strong foothold here,with 65 per cent of the Gujarati traders being from the community now.
Kathiawaris are becoming a formidable force in the Antwerp diamond market, says Ashit Mehta,chairman of the $1 billion-plus Arjav Diamonds NV,one of the top three diamond companies in Antwerp.But it is still Gujaratis ruling the market. Mehta is also the board member of the Antwerp World Diamond Centre (AWDC).
Many Jews,who traded diamonds in the public hall of Antwerps imposing Diamond Beurs are so worried about the new competitive pressure that they now prefer to meet clients in the privacy of their offices for fear that Indians will poach their remaining business.Some 25 years ago,Antwerp had than 30,000 diamond cutters and polishers.But now,the number has dropped to only 1,000 as most of the manufacturing has moved to Surat.
According to Mehta,whatever Palanpuri Jains are today in Antwerp is only due to their visionaries,who had set up their shops decades ago.Now,it is our responsibility to preserve our position so that our next generation can take the trade to higher levels.
.
Once upon a time,the British ruled our land.Today,Palanpuri Jains and Kathiawaris rule the diamond trade in Antwerp.Being a professional attached to the diamond industry for the last 25 years,I am proud that Indians are the bosses of the international diamond trade, says KK Sharma,executive director of Indian Diamond Institute.
_______________________________________
Among the examples of Indian-American success, the book notes that of all the ethnic groups that the Census Bureau tracks, Indian-Americans have the highest median household income — $90,500 — compared with $51,200 for the United States as a whole.....You get the picture: Indian-Americans are doing awesome............... In fact, an eye-popping 44 percent of Indian-American households have incomes exceeding $100,000, compared with 21 percent for the entire country.
- India needs a MFN status with the USA that bypasses the Rothschild of London.
- India requires the lifting of trade quotas which are more SEVERE than those between MANY MANY MANY other USA partner countries.
- India requires technology transfer agreements from the USA that is significant and verifiable.
- The ditching of gimmicky slogans which constantly pronounce how special the relationship between the two countries are.
- Greater respect for Indian public figures in the USA, when they come visiting for cultural events. Rather than being singled out, like no other country on the orders of the Rothschilds of London......ditto Australia in the past.
- The Rothschilds are entitled to love another country MORE than the country they live in, and which allows them to enriches themselves....I like easy listening music, some movies, pizza, beautiful women, lounging and Pan Iranism. But my likes are not used as battering rams against something else to profess my love for the above....let me get into a 12 year world explanation mode if I may. Example 1: I like pizza therefore I must profess my hatred to the world about hamburgers, or tacos....the supposed rival of the pizza in the fast food industry to emphasize my love for the pizza. Example 2: I like Chelsea FC but I hate Man U, the premier League rival, and therefore I must attack Man U fans when they come to Rothschild run London to profess my tribal soccer loyalty. This is both Neanderthal and puerile. No Sane State must build their complex state policies on such whimsical puerile peccadilloes of the London elite.
________________________________________
US “troubled” over slew of deals during Putin-Modi summit
ByThe outcome of the recent summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi gave an all-embracing boost to the strategic partnership between Russia and India. A total of 20 agreements, including in the key fields of defence, nuclear energy and oil and gas were signed during the summit. All these deals are long-term in nature.
According to the media reports, during the summit, the two sides signed
$100 billion worth of commercial deals, including $40 billion in nuclear
energy, $50 billion in oil and gas and $10 billion in the fields of defence,
fertilizers, space and diamonds. A Joint Statement for strengthening the
Indo-Russian friendship over the next decade was also signed.
.
While the unprecedented success achieved by the two sides during the summit was welcomed by Putin and Modi, at their joint press conference, it provoked US to issue angry statements, disapproving the further strengthening of Russia-India bilateral ties. It was not only upset over India’s move to sign a slew of agreements with Russia, but also strongly objected to the presence of Crimea’s Prime Minister Sergei Aksenov in Putin’s delegation. It may be recalled, Aksenov had been included in the list of sanctions of the US, EU and Canada.
Washington took the Indian move, as a challenge to its so-called “global authority” at a time when it was coercing the European Union (EU) and other countries into tightening a series of sanctions against Moscow following the Ukrainian crisis and reunification of Crimea Republic with Russia in a referendum earlier this year. Pro-West Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, who was on a visit to Sydney, also did not lose time to condemn the Indian move to welcome Aksenov in India.
.
With their eyes on defence and nuclear energy deals, the US and other Western leaders have been trying to woo the new Indian Prime Minister for closer cooperation in these fields. Washington wanted to capture India’s defence and nuclear energy market. It recently dislodged Russia from top position in supplying arms, but so far failed to get any nuclear reactors deals. During their talks, in New Delhi, Putin and Modi decided to speed up the implementation of defence and nuclear energy cooperation programmes between the two countries. The US fears that their decision to increase bilateral cooperation in these spheres may make it lose the Indian market to Russia.
.
“Even as India’s options have increased today, Russia will remain our most important defence partner,” Modi said in his press statement after talks with Putin. He also referred to nuclear energy cooperation, in addition, to four reactors to be built at Kudankulam. “Today we have outlined an ambitious vision for nuclear energy of at least ten more reactors. It will have the highest standards of safety in the world. It will also include manufacture of equipment and components in India.”
Reacting over the Indo-Russian deals in defence and nuclear energy fields and inclusion of Aksenov in Putin’s delegation to India, in Washington, the US Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said: “It’s not time for business as usual with Russia. We have conveyed this, certainly, to our allies and to our partners across the world.” She also said that the US was “troubled” by reports that the delegation accompanying Putin included Aksenov and sought clarifications on the matter from New Delhi.
.
Since the beginning of the Ukrainian crisis, India has refused to back sanctions against Russia by the West. On the eve of the India-Russia summit, the External Affairs Ministry in a statement reiterated that New Delhi could never be a party to any sanctions against Moscow. The Joint Secretary (Eurasia) in the Ministry, Ajay Bisaria said the Indo-Russian ties are characterized by “special and privileged strategic partnership” and India considered the Ukrainian crisis as the former Soviet Republic’s internal problem.
.
The Joint Statement issued by Putin and Modi also said, “India and Russia oppose economic sanctions that do not have the approval of the United Nations Security Council.”
In this connection, the trip by Aksenov to India could negatively affect “the friendly relations” established recently by Modi with US President Barack Obama during his visit to Washington, in September. Modi has already invited Obama to be the chief guest on the India’s Republic Day on January 26. Analysts said the controversy could overshadow Obama’s visit.
.
During his visit to Mumbai, Aksenov signed a MoU between Crimean Republic and Gul Kripalani, chairman of the Indian business group Indian-Crimean Partnership. After signing the document, he said that the MoU is an “important milestone” in the development of bilateral relations between Russia and India.
.
Aksenov organized a paramilitary force on the Crimean Peninsula early this year as pro-Western protests grew in Kiev, the Ukrainian capital. He was one of the first people to be singled out by the United States for sanctions. The symbolic show of support has put New Delhi in the middle of one of the bitterest disputes between Moscow and the West.
.
After his return, Aksenov told reporters in Simferopol that US State Department’s spokeswoman’s statements against his trip to India, “have not brought any results” to the US representative.
“During the trip, this country’s leadership achieved the objectives it had. With the Indians, we discussed various business topics and we share an understanding on how to proceed with the implementation of projects. For further cooperation, we have invited to Crimea representatives of India’s businesses,” he said.
.
Russian State Duma, the lower house, International Affairs Committee chairman Alexei Pushkov said the US call on other countries not to have dealings with Russia was absurd. "The US has called on all countries of the world not to conduct business with Russia. I think this call won't be heard outside the US’ close allies. It is absurd," Pushkov said.
.
The Indian External Affairs Ministry has so far not officially commented on the attack from the US and Ukraine over the issue. Observers said it’s too early to forecast how India might react to the pressure from the US regarding its bilateral relationship with Russia.
.
While the unprecedented success achieved by the two sides during the summit was welcomed by Putin and Modi, at their joint press conference, it provoked US to issue angry statements, disapproving the further strengthening of Russia-India bilateral ties. It was not only upset over India’s move to sign a slew of agreements with Russia, but also strongly objected to the presence of Crimea’s Prime Minister Sergei Aksenov in Putin’s delegation. It may be recalled, Aksenov had been included in the list of sanctions of the US, EU and Canada.
Washington took the Indian move, as a challenge to its so-called “global authority” at a time when it was coercing the European Union (EU) and other countries into tightening a series of sanctions against Moscow following the Ukrainian crisis and reunification of Crimea Republic with Russia in a referendum earlier this year. Pro-West Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, who was on a visit to Sydney, also did not lose time to condemn the Indian move to welcome Aksenov in India.
.
With their eyes on defence and nuclear energy deals, the US and other Western leaders have been trying to woo the new Indian Prime Minister for closer cooperation in these fields. Washington wanted to capture India’s defence and nuclear energy market. It recently dislodged Russia from top position in supplying arms, but so far failed to get any nuclear reactors deals. During their talks, in New Delhi, Putin and Modi decided to speed up the implementation of defence and nuclear energy cooperation programmes between the two countries. The US fears that their decision to increase bilateral cooperation in these spheres may make it lose the Indian market to Russia.
.
“Even as India’s options have increased today, Russia will remain our most important defence partner,” Modi said in his press statement after talks with Putin. He also referred to nuclear energy cooperation, in addition, to four reactors to be built at Kudankulam. “Today we have outlined an ambitious vision for nuclear energy of at least ten more reactors. It will have the highest standards of safety in the world. It will also include manufacture of equipment and components in India.”
Reacting over the Indo-Russian deals in defence and nuclear energy fields and inclusion of Aksenov in Putin’s delegation to India, in Washington, the US Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said: “It’s not time for business as usual with Russia. We have conveyed this, certainly, to our allies and to our partners across the world.” She also said that the US was “troubled” by reports that the delegation accompanying Putin included Aksenov and sought clarifications on the matter from New Delhi.
.
Since the beginning of the Ukrainian crisis, India has refused to back sanctions against Russia by the West. On the eve of the India-Russia summit, the External Affairs Ministry in a statement reiterated that New Delhi could never be a party to any sanctions against Moscow. The Joint Secretary (Eurasia) in the Ministry, Ajay Bisaria said the Indo-Russian ties are characterized by “special and privileged strategic partnership” and India considered the Ukrainian crisis as the former Soviet Republic’s internal problem.
.
The Joint Statement issued by Putin and Modi also said, “India and Russia oppose economic sanctions that do not have the approval of the United Nations Security Council.”
In this connection, the trip by Aksenov to India could negatively affect “the friendly relations” established recently by Modi with US President Barack Obama during his visit to Washington, in September. Modi has already invited Obama to be the chief guest on the India’s Republic Day on January 26. Analysts said the controversy could overshadow Obama’s visit.
.
During his visit to Mumbai, Aksenov signed a MoU between Crimean Republic and Gul Kripalani, chairman of the Indian business group Indian-Crimean Partnership. After signing the document, he said that the MoU is an “important milestone” in the development of bilateral relations between Russia and India.
.
Aksenov organized a paramilitary force on the Crimean Peninsula early this year as pro-Western protests grew in Kiev, the Ukrainian capital. He was one of the first people to be singled out by the United States for sanctions. The symbolic show of support has put New Delhi in the middle of one of the bitterest disputes between Moscow and the West.
.
After his return, Aksenov told reporters in Simferopol that US State Department’s spokeswoman’s statements against his trip to India, “have not brought any results” to the US representative.
“During the trip, this country’s leadership achieved the objectives it had. With the Indians, we discussed various business topics and we share an understanding on how to proceed with the implementation of projects. For further cooperation, we have invited to Crimea representatives of India’s businesses,” he said.
.
Russian State Duma, the lower house, International Affairs Committee chairman Alexei Pushkov said the US call on other countries not to have dealings with Russia was absurd. "The US has called on all countries of the world not to conduct business with Russia. I think this call won't be heard outside the US’ close allies. It is absurd," Pushkov said.
.
The Indian External Affairs Ministry has so far not officially commented on the attack from the US and Ukraine over the issue. Observers said it’s too early to forecast how India might react to the pressure from the US regarding its bilateral relationship with Russia.
