Obama reared by the KGB....Who installed him into power.

.
.
.
.
Obama was reared by the Jewish run 800,000 strong KGB from the 1960's like a sleeper agent in the making, and brought into power by them as President of the JEWSA, as with Mikhail Gorbachov (Jew) , Yeltsin and Putin (Jew) and Medvedev (Jew).......his mother was a KGB agent and his real father (Not the Kenyan one) may have been yet another black KGB agent.

This is all gossip of course.

But we must congratulate the evil filthy conspiring International Jew in their ability to manipulate the GREATEST nation on earth and in their ability to bring such a mongrelised creature to power through their manipulation of their mass-run Jewtube/Jewivision, and media empire such as Fox News, CNN, and WSJ and Washington Post.

A "nice man" who beams and smiles of humble one parent background who faced racism and genteel poverty. A law professor from Harvard who is sophisticated and therefore has a conscience.....and therefore deserving of a Noble Peace Prize just after his anointment.....because he provides hope for millions in the JEWSA and the Third World (Cairo address).....because he will bring "Change that YOU can believe and trust in" from the Bush era shoot first ask questions later foreign policy of them (beaners/ragheads/sand niggers) and us.

This Mongrelised Jew creature seeks a second term through the utterly compromised electoral system of the JEWSA.










































____________________________

Blackmailer in Chief: “I Cannot Guarantee Retirees Will Receive Their Social Security Checks August 3″

Posted by willyloman

by Scott Creighton

“This is not just a matter of Social Security. These are Veterans checks, folks on disability their checks. About 70 million checks… I cannot guarantee those checks go out if we have resolved this issue because there may not simply be the money in the coffers to do it” President Obama

I can’t think of a worse president than Barack Obama.

This man is a liar and a manipulator. He does everything he needs to do in order to benefit big business and the financial institutions and whenever he gets a chance he exploits the most vulnerable people in our society in order to get policies pushed through that normally no one in their right mind would accept.

Social Security checks have nothing to do with the daily finances of the government. Social Security is a solvent, self-sustaining program and for the president to use that threat as blackmail in order to justify some sort of neoliberal “compromise” is beyond disgusting… it should be criminal.

This is the exact same thing Obama and the Clintonista Dems did with the unemployment insurance extension at the end of last year. The dems refused to bring the extension bill to the floor of the House prior to the election of 2010 even though they knew that the House minority leader had already said publicly that he would support it. They deliberately waited till late December so that they could use that pending crisis (the end of the unemployment insurance payments for millions of Americans) as the pretext to forge a “compromise” with the republicans for the 4 year extension of the Bush tax cuts for the rich. It was blackmail, not a game of chicken.

Now Obama and the neoliberal Clintonista White House are ginning up another fake crisis they can use to justify folding on the Social Security and Medicare provisions in the debt ceiling negotiations and it’s absolutely sickening to watch.

I’ll tell you something; over the years I have learned a lot about our history, things they don’t teach in school books. I’ve learned a lot about the behavior of certain presidents, what they did for and to the people of this country and many, many others. Most of it has just been bad… for everyone except a very few. And I’ll tell you, I think hands down Barack Obama is quickly becoming the worst president I know of, he’s certainly the worst in recent years.

W? Well, he was bad… we had that whole false flag thing, but I don’t think he knew anything about it till it was nearly over and he was told not to return to Washington while Condi and Cheney were still directing the whole thing from the bunker. Bush certainly aided in war-crimes against Afghanistan and Iraq, but so has Barack and Barack has included Yemen, Libya, Somalia, and Pakistan. bush tortured, but so has Barack… and the latter promised to end it and open up real investigations. Bush arrested dissidents, but not like Obama has, recording more arrests of whistle-blowers than W did and in fact more than any other president ever. Barack even claims to be able to kill US citizens abroad at will, something W wouldn’t have dreamed of getting away with.

And now Barack is going to make a reality of the Reagan dream of neoliberalizing Social Security and Medicare and he’s going to do it based on lies and fear-mongering just a few months after securing 4 more years of Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 1 tenth of 1% of the population.

Perhaps it was all that time Barack spent living with his mommy, who was nothing more than a CIA asset in the USAID program under the dictator Suharto in Indonesia.

Perhaps that’s when Barack developed his loathing for the working and middle classes. It’s hard to say.

But this man, this president, has very little empathy for his fellow Americans, that much is sure.

Back in the days of the Bush presidency, there were times when I almost felt sorry for him when he went out to speak about something he didn’t like or thought was bullshit. You could see it on his face, you could read it in his body language.

Not Barack.

This MFer doesn’t feel a thing when he goes out to spread his lies which will fuck over a major percentage of the American people. He feels nothing and you can see that on his face just as plainly as you could read W.

It’s possible that Woodrow Wilson might have been worse. I don’t know enough about his history.

I do know that it is widely speculated that at some point he publicly regretted his part in helping to create the Federal Reserve. The quote is of questionable origins at best and probably lifted in part from one of his earlier campaign speeches given long before the Fed was even created so it’s highly possible that he may have been even worse than Obama. Only time will tell.

This latest attempt by Obama to terrify the public into accepting more austerity measures is just plain vile. Ever since the Business Plot, a plan to stage an armed coup here in the United States back in 1933, these criminals have dreamed of dismantling the social safety net created by the New Deal. They dreamed of destroying Glass-Steagall and they achieved that in the first Clintonista regime and now they are moving toward busting up Social Security and Medicare under the second. Obama is steadily working to privatize the entire public education system and eagerly signing us up for as many “humanitarian interventions” as he and the Clintons think they can get away with.

I don’t think there is any doubt that he is already, in a mere 2 years, the worst president we have ever seen in our lifetimes. The more his left cover gets away with, the more they will want to take from us. It boggles the mind what he will try to get away with four years from now.

President Barack Hussein Obama

The Jewish power behind the throne, David Axelrod.

The Jewish front, out of nowhere.

Why the false paradigm of left and right.............there is no left and right politics in America; no real choice for the people; just a bunch of Jewish puppet masters elaborately running the show from behind the scene....who ultimately have only one agenda.....the propagation of Jewish interest over and above the WASP's interests in America, and the protection of Israel......thats all that counts...and all the elaborate analysis below means nothing, zilch because it all boils down to what the Jew wants in America, and which front for them will do their biding the most obediently, and sell their wares most effectively.

There is no evidence to prove that Mondale, Dukakis or even Kucinich if the Jew firewall allowed them to be elected, would have done a better job of representing the interests of ordinary working Americans......because they would be up against the 'system'. By suggesting that the problems of America is a merely ideological problem, and if only they would embrace a pure brand of Socialism or something similar, then things would be alright and peachy. This is a fallacy. Since when has there ever been a Socialist paradise? Ultimately it is the people who run the state structure and system that counts, and the key American system and structure is run by the Jews for the Jews.

Consider that well over 50% of the billionaires in America are Jewish (The rest crypto-Jews), and that Jews through their networks are financially better off, and are the very group that have benefited under Bush's tax cuts. You Mike live in America, and the Jew word associated with bad things is simply not possible for you psychologically, as you live in their media controlled world, and so you find other elaborate creative explanations for what is otherwise an obvious explanation of why ordinary Americans are hurting, and the rich are getting richer, and why America is attacking weak Third World states on the other side of the world internationally, for Israel.

Electing a leader to tilt to the left won't help matters in America........what you need to do is create a WASP party, that is not infiltrated by Jews, get some funding from WASP billionaires and organize..............then you have a chance......but it will not be easy. Ron Paul failed; he failed to galvanize ordinary Americans who are unhappy with the state of affairs because who knows? He lacked charisma and youthful energy, or organizational skills, or campaign flare...........though his message was the right one, and there are enough ordinary Americans who were fed up with everything that is run by the Jew----but can't seem to name it. You got to have the financial backing, the big bucks as they say, and you have to have a more proactive campaign...........then there is the issue of Diebold and rigged elections..............the Jew media..........The Jew Mafia........the Jew security structure....vested most prominently in the FBI and Homeland security.........Jew Wall Street......So any decent WASP candidate batting for the 70% majority would be up against it. As long as the WASP candidate knows the true political parameters.........then you can really begin to campaign.

Barak Hussein Obama will front the Jew policies of genocide against Muslim countries, and that is why he is being groomed for leadership of America. He has been groomed by them for a long time, no doubt given his unremarkable background and his virtual lack of connections to begin with from his family with any significant political movements........and that given his humble background he will be all too grateful for being given the privilege of office as the first 'black' President----'Thank you massa sir'.

This suggests that under him America will continue to have a very pro-active foreign policy, and there will be no respite for the rest of the world, especially in the Middle East. With domestic American issues no serious attempts will be made to solve the mess Bush leaves behind.

More of the same with a brown cover, and more eloquent words....but no real deeds of substance to benefit the masses..............the policies of Bush are not the policies of George Walker Bush per se (Do you think he ever spends his time thinking deeply about the American tax system, foreign policy, security issues? He is classic front), but of the Jews...........and now they will elect another to continue with those policies.

The baton is passed on...

_________________________________

Worse than McCain

By Mike Whitney

11/07/08 "ICH" --- - Every four years, liberals and progressives are expected to set aside their beliefs and stand foursquare behind the Democratic Party candidate. This ritual is invariably performed in the name of party unity. It doesn't matter if the candidate is a smooth-talking politician who's willing to toss his Pastor of 20 years overboard for a few awkward comments, or whether he refuses to defend basic civil liberties like the 4th amendment's right to privacy. All that matters is that there's a big "D" following his name and that he shows he's willing to engage in some meaningless verbal jousting with his Republican opponent.

For nearly a year now, the public has been treated to regular doses of Mr. Obama's grandiloquent oratory and his sweeping "Follow me to Shangri-la" promises. These flourishes are usually followed by "clarifications" on the central issues which identify Obama as a center-right conservative with no intention of disrupting the status quo. Political analyst Alexander Cockburn summed it up like this in a recent article on counterpunch:

"There have plenty of articles recently with headlines such “Obama’s Lunge to the Right”. I find these odd. Never for one moment has Obama ever struck me as someone anchored, or even loosely moored to the left, or even displaying the slightest appetite for radical notions, aside from a few taglines tossed from the campaign bus." (Alexander Cockburn, "Could Anyone be Worse than Bush?")

Cockburn is right and most people know it. They simply ignore the facts because the thought of the unstable John McCain in the Oval Office with his stubby fingers just inches from the Big Red Switch is too much to bear. So, they throw their support behind Obama and hope for the best. But Obama has done nothing to earn their vote and there's nothing to indicate that he has any interest in restoring the republic or putting and end to US adventurism. He's just a one-term senator with zero foreign policy experience who doesn't want to rock the boat. That's it. He'd rather keep his position on the issues blurry and rattle off lofty-sounding platitudes than state plainly how he feels. Unfortunately, when he's pinned down and has to give a straight answer, he quickly swerves to the right where he feels most at home.

This concerns the Obamaniacs who worry that behind the rhetorical fanfare, Barak is just an empty gourd; a well-spoken pitch man with no moral core. Could he be another Slick Willie, they wonder; another self-promoting politico as eager to sell out his working class supporters as chase a frisky intern around the Lincoln bedroom? No one knows, because no one has figured out exactly why Obama is running. Does he really want to lift the country from the muck of 8 years of Bush misrule or does he just want to gad about on Airforce 1 and make pretty speeches in the Rose Garden? What really drives Obama? It's a mystery.

But don't be fooled, Obama could turn out to be worse than McCain, much worse. No one doubts that he is brighter and more charismatic than the irritating senator from Arizona. And no one underestimates his Pied Piper ability to galvanize crowds and stir up national pride. But what good is that? Obama works for the same group of venal plutocrats as Bush; a fact that was made painfully clear just last week when he voted to approve the new FISA bill that allows the president to continue spying on American citizens with impunity. Obama is a constitutional scholar; he understood what he was voting for. He was sending a message to his supporters that they don't really matter; that what really counts is the small gaggle of powerful corporatists who run the country and believe the president is above the law. That's what his vote really meant.

So, why vote for him? We don't need a glamor boy to trash the Bill of Rights. Any old autocrat will do. Just pick a name from the "resident scholar" list at the American Enterprise Institute. That ought to do it.

And we don't need another paper-mache president who tries to conceal America's war crimes behind stuffy-sounding pronouncements about the "Islamofacism" and other terrorist mumbo-jumbo. What we need is someone with enough guts and moral fiber to shake up the political establishment, put an end to the wars and covert operations, and clean up Wall Street.

Obama has dazzled the media with his easy manner and his savoir faire, but he's not the right man for the job. He has surrounded himself with ex-Clintonistas who will continue the global onslaught with even greater ferocity than Bush, although much more discreetly.(After all, this is the empire's A Team) And just like Clinton, who bombed the bejesus out of Belgrade for 87 days without batting an eye; Obama will keep the war machine chugging along at full-throttle while he diverts the media with his colorful bloviating and his rock star persona. No thanks.

What the world really needs is a five or ten year break from the United States; a little breather so people can unwind and take it easy for a while without worrying that their wedding party will be vaporized in blast of napalm or that their brother-in-law will be dragged off to some CIA hellhole where his eyes are gouged out and his fingernails ripped off. That's what the world really needs, a temporary pause in the imperial violence. But there won't be any sabbatical under Field-Marshall Obama; no way. As journalist Bill Van Auken points out in his article on the World Socialist web site, Obama may turn out to be the point-man for reinstating the draft:

Obama has "lamented the failure of the Bush administration to issue “a call to service” and “a call for shared sacrifice....There is no challenge greater than the defense of our nation and our values,” said Obama. We “need to ease the burden on our troops, while meeting the challenges of the 21st century," which, according to Obama, will require an "increase US ground forces by 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 Marines.'" ("Obama continues lurch to the right on Iraq war and militarism" Bill Van Auken)

Is that why the political establishment is so enthusiastic about Obama, because they need a better recruiting sergeant than the uninspiring McCain?

No one has followed Obama's rightward drift with greater interest and bemusement than the editors of the Wall Street Journal. They have faithfully chronicled all the vacillating, obfuscating and backpedaling and they've made up their minds; Obama is marching straight towards the welcoming arms of the Republican Party. That's right; he's gradually embracing the conservative platform and abandoning any pretense of liberalism. Two weeks ago the WSJ ran an editorial that summarized Obama's metamorphosis in an article titled "Bush's Third Term":

"We're beginning to understand why Barack Obama keeps protesting so vigorously against the prospect of 'George Bush's third term.' Maybe he's worried that someone will notice that he's the candidate who's running for it.

Most Presidential candidates adapt their message after they win their party nomination, but Mr. Obama isn't merely 'running to the center.' He's fleeing from many of his primary positions so markedly and so rapidly that he's embracing a sizable chunk of President Bush's policy. Who would have thought that a Democrat would rehabilitate the much-maligned Bush agenda?" (Wall Street Journal)

That's fair enough. Obama has changed his position on his "support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies". He has wormed his way out of a definite commitment on withdrawaling the troops from Iraq. (which was a real lesson in Clintonian triangulation) He's backed off on his promise to rewrite the NAFTA free trade agreement. He's thrown his support behind Bush's "faith-based" social programs which provide state money for religious organizations. He's even sided with the far-right loonies on the Supreme Court on gun rights and whether to ban the death penalty for rape. (truly outrageous) How can anyone support a candidate who is on the same ideological side of legal issues as Antonin Scalia?

In the past few weeks, Senator Switcheroo has blasted Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad while, at the same time, heaping praise on our "good friend" Israel. Obama even has a two paragraph commentary on his campaign web site lauding Israel's devastating attack on Lebanon a year ago which killed 1,500 civilians and reduced much of the country's vital infrastructure to rubble.

Still think the "peace candidate" does not have the warmongering bone fides to do the empire's dirty work?

Think again.

Many of us who have criticized Obama are being dismissed as cynics, but that's nonsense. The truth is that the Obama supporters have projected their own values onto their candidate and are trying to make him out to be something that he is not. They put words in his mouth so they can continue to hold on to the crazy notion that the system really isn't broken and that it can be fixed by simply pulling a lever on election day. This is just the lazy-man's way of ignoring the real work that needs to be done to restore American democracy; the organizing of groups and networks, the building of labor unions and working coalitions, the focussed determination to root-out corruption and entrenched corporate power. The system has to be rebuilt from the bottom-up not the top-down. It'll take a revolution in thinking and lots of hard work. There's no quick fix. Freedom isn't free anymore; deal with it. Voting for Obama and keeping one's fingers crossed, is not a sign of hope. It's a sign of self-delusion.