.
.
.
As Henry Kissinger sagely advised, it is too dangerous to be an ally of the USA.
The USA is now run by Neo-con Jews, who in turn take their advice from the extremist Likud Party of Israel, and the Jewish Globalist Billionaires(Rothschilds, Rockefeller's, Soros's......Kock brothers, Adelson and an assortment of other mafia type Jews)
Israel now wants Eretz Israel......and this was clearly articulated by the Yinon Plan from 1982, The Neocons then wrote the Clean Break document of (1996).....and the Project for a New American Century (2000) written by the Jewish neocons again. A cover for more wars for Israel in the Middle East.
Progressively the project has got bigger, using the USA as the work horse for the project.
Part of this Jewish plan has been to create Controlled Clownish enemies to shoot at, or get the hapless USA go after them under false Jew set pretexts.
This was initiated in the 1970's with the full backing of the UK state, through their agent in Washington Bernard Lewis...a Jew and a Zionist servant of the Rothschilds of London, working for British Intelligence and the FO.
Thus Hamas was created by Israel.
As was Hezbollah in the 1980's.
The Afghan Mujaheddin in 1979.....and the Taliban in 1994.......'al-Qaeda' in 1998 in Afghanistan.
A Muslim Brotherhood Putsch in 1981 in Egypt........and Syria 1982.
But most famously, in CIA/Mossad/British Intelligence run Iran, where the Jewish Shah was ditched and the utterly ridiculous puppet mullahs installed.
This CYCLE of Radical fifth column Islamism was repeated by the same crooks in 2011 in Libya where the Jewish Gadaffi was deposed; in Tunisia; in Egypt and in Syria as a work in progress and Iraq.
ISIS is run, trained and armed by these above Western powers...and it is said English is the natural language of most of the commanders of ISIS.
............SO the puppet mullahs are brought into power in Persia in 1979, but naturally whilst there may have been a very loose coalition willing to see the CIA puppet Shah go, MAYBE, most Iranians CERTAINLY did not want a country run by mullahs.........which Muslim country would want such a terrible thing?
None.....Not one single Muslim country. Mullahs are meant to run Mosques....that is all.
So the Rothschlds of London think about how to keep the mullahs in power:
1. Create a Mullah hero....Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini ( A British agent since the 1930's recruited and sustained on a monthly stipend. Shipped out of Iran by British Intelligence for his own protection in 1964 into Iraq....then into France for his BBC propagandized publicized return to Iran)...makes a Grand Orchestrated Entrance into Iran with the Mossad/CIA/British Intelligence operatives mingling with the Iranian donkey crowds at the airport.
2. Take over the American embassy, and make this manufactured drama the center piece of what mullah Iran is about....52 Americans for 444 days. Keep the Iranian public captivated and engrossed by this manufactured drama with a possible invasion by the USA, rather than having Iranians asking rational questions about the true nature of mullahs in power in Iran. This is an idea from the UK. George Bush got them released for the Republican Party Presidential hopeful.......via promises of various kinds.
3. Bait Iraq with provocations on the border, and inside Iraq using the Shia in that country......to the point where CIA Saddam with American manufactured 'Dutch Courage' and promises unleashes 500,000 men into Iran in August 1980.
The real losers of this gay faggot tragedy is the Iranian people............5 million educated Iranians have left Iran for Western countries taking with them assets worth $1.5 trillion. The Iran/Iraq war cost the lives of 1 million Iranian people and infrastructure and economic damage estimated at $700 billion; The execution of thousands upon thousands of good Iranian people by the mullahs and continuing......Iran heads the list for 'officially' the highest number of children and minors executed by the state. .........and so on.
The Good thing is that American and British embassies won't be coming back to Tehran for a long time to come.
The loss for the USA are less, and for the Bohemian Grove-- Transatlantic--- Globalist--- Neo-con type the price was maybe worth paying. The loss of a good obedient Jewish ally in the Middle East......Iran as a military base, and as the Policeman of the Gulf for the USA (Clearly Israel and Pakistan want that job).....The humiliation of America with the hostage crisis, and the perception that America 'Lost"......and finally the loss of potential trade with Iran/USA...at anything between $700 billion---$1600 Billion depending on the price of oil...1979--2014.
Everybody has their own bench marks for success............Jewish neocons must do too. One however does not think they think of what is good for America given their Likudnik Peccadilloes. A rather strong argument can be made by Jewish writers that Likudniks may not even be good for the little Sparta in the Levant.
_________________________________________
Thirty-five years after Iranian hostage crisis, aftershocks remain
The beginning of mistrust
By Stephen Kinzer at the Boston Globe
AFP/Getty Images
Iranian students climbed over the wall of the US embassy in Tehran on Nov. 4, 1979..
Jimmy CARTER
has called Nov. 4 “a date I will never forget.” Other Americans may not
remember the date, but as a nation we are still captive to the
humiliating trauma that began unfolding precisely 35 years ago during
Carter’s presidency. At 10:30 on the morning of Nov. 4, 1979, several
hundred young Iranians climbed the walls of the American embassy in
Tehran and stormed inside. By early afternoon, they had captured,
blindfolded, and handcuffed dozens of American citizens and diplomats,
including 52 who would remain in their hands for 444 days. Thus began a
crisis that may now be seen as one of the crucial events in the modern
history of both the United States and the Middle East.
.
Plenty
has happened in the intervening decades to give Iran and the United
States reason to mistrust each other. Each country has blamed the other
for fomenting terror in the Middle East, and each has violently attacked
the other’s vital interests. Yet when I recently asked one lifelong
Washington insider to explain why the American political class remains
so obsessed with isolating and punishing Iran, he immediately replied,
“It all goes back to the hostage crisis.” The emotional legacy of that
episode has proven astonishingly long-lasting.
.
Because the invasion of our embassy violated
every law of God and man, it naturally outraged Americans. The most
deplorable aspect of this crime was that it seemed to have been
committed for no reason other than nihilistic hatred. This, coupled with
searing images of helpless hostages, shaped the image of Iranians that
many American politicians still cherish: hateful terrorists permanently
outside the rational world order.
.
Years
later, several of the hostage-takers wrote accounts that make clear how
completely we misunderstood their motive. It turns out that they did not
seize the embassy out of fanatic passion, but for a clear and rational
reason. The deposed shah of Iran had just been admitted to the United
States for medical treatment, and Iranians feared that this was the
beginning of a CIA plot to re-install him on his Peacock Throne. This
was hardly far-fetched, since the CIA had done it before. The shah had
been forced to flee in 1953, but CIA officers working in the basement of
the US embassy organized a coup and brought him back. That consigned
Iran to a quarter-century of royal dictatorship.
.
Few
Americans had any idea that Iranian democracy had been crushed in 1953.
Even fewer knew that the United States was mainly responsible for the
operation. These truths have dribbled out slowly, and have not
penetrated our national consciousness.
.
Carter decided to admit the shah under heavy
pressure from three of the shah’s most powerful American allies: David
Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, and John McCloy. He rejected pleas from
American diplomats in Tehran, who sent him a cable warning that
admitting the shah “would almost certainly meet with immediate and
violent reaction.” When those diplomats were told that their appeal had
been ignored, one of them later recalled, “faces literally went white.”
Eerily, Carter himself seemed to have some idea of what might lie ahead.
At one White House meeting, he rhetorically asked his aides, “What are
you guys going to advise me to do if they overrun our embassy and take
our people hostage?”
AFP/Getty Images
A blindfolded hostage was paraded by his captors in the US Embassy
Compound on Nov. 8, 1979, as an Iranian crowd of thousands reportedly
chanted, “death to Carter — Yankee go home.”.
One lesson of this crisis is that
presidents should listen to their diplomats, not to self-interested
outsiders. The more important one is that powerful images can hold
entire nations captive for long periods. The humiliating theater of
hostage-taking, stretched out over more than 14 months, aroused American
emotions so intensely that they have still not calmed down. We readily
believe that Iranians are devious terrorists eager to wreak havoc in the
world because that fits the image of Iran we ignorantly embraced 35
years ago.
.
The hostage crisis had
far-reaching effects. It stirred patriotic sentiment in Iran that
allowed the Islamic government to consolidate its power, and drove the
United States into the arms of Saddam Hussein, who we supported in the
Iran-Iraq war because we were so angry at Iran. Perhaps the worst effect
was that it created passions in both countries that blind us to the
deep interests we share in the Middle East and beyond. No episode in
living memory shows so clearly that self-defeating emotion can
grotesquely misshape global politics.
Related:
. _________________________________________________________
Stephen Kinzer is a visiting fellow at the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University. Follow him on Twitter @stephenkinzer.
