.
.
.
.JPG)
.
.
.
.
Russians are partly ethnically Iranian/Aryan. Of the 142 million Russians maybe 70--80 million are of Iranian/Aryan descent, and the rest are made up of Slavs, Uighur-Altaic's and some Germans, West of the Urals in the Baltic hinterland. The Scythian empire (800 BC to 200 BC) stretching from Hungary to Siberia was essentially an Iranian/Aryan empire. The Scythian empire and the Iranian/Aryan run Persian empire mostly co-existed.
With the creation of the Romanov Russian empire from the 16th century, we essentially had a rebirth of the earlier Scythian empire under the rule and direction by the same people, covering almost exactly the same geographical area.
Therefore Russia must help their "brothers" to the South who now are threatened with illegal unwarranted attacks by the JEWUSA, and its little master ISRAEL. We see the result of failure to help brothers in need in the Balkans, where now both Bosnia and Kosovo are failed narco states. Russia's weakness and indecision allowed these tragedies and crimes.
Russia's weakness and defensiveness allowed NATO next to Russia.
But let us leave aside such romantic notions of "brotherhood" and let us talk cold hard facts, and the importance of the defense and survival of Russia itself. These are issues I have covered before in 2006 addressed to Putin, and I am making them again.
If the JEWUSA with ISRAEL are allowed freely to attack Iran, without any hindrance, where they initially destroy the country, as the JEWUSA did in the Balkans and Iraq (1991---2003) from the air, and then invade after weakening Iran's defenses, then the JEWUSA empire will have a continuous link from Iraq........Iran.....and Afghanistan. A solid block and base from where they can strike against Southern Russia.
In understanding this policy one must inform oneself of the British agent of influence professor Bernard Lewis in utilizing America, and the creation of the artificial "Arch of Crisis" using Islamic fundamentalists and the role of Zbigniew Brzezinski from the early 1970's (The Grand Chessboard). The covert arming, funding training of Islamic fundamentalism, as a fifth column to spearhead the JEWUSA empire, and threaten Russia on its Southern borders, amongst other strategic policies else where.(Operation Cyclone, Operation Greenbelt, the creation of the Taliban, "al-Qaeda" and the coordination of action by the Islamic Brotherhood in the Greater Middle East under the umbrella of several Islamic fundamentalist groups.)
An attack and invasion of Iran is an attack and invasion of Russia, and this is where Russia must fight, properly. It is in this area where Russia must not be unambiguous or indecisive. The defense of Venezuela and Cuba is less relevant for Russia. The defense of North Korea is less relevant for Russia, as the Chinese can more than adequately defend that state if required...............it is the isolated Iranians that Russia must defend, because of the geography of that country.
The Mullahs of Iran are unpalatable, installed puppets of the UK in 1979 to weaken Iran internally and destroy Iran's reputation externally-------these UK installed agents have done good work for their masters. However it would be wrong for any Russian administration to conclude that in providing arms to Iran now would somehow constitute a tacit acceptance of and defense of a vile theocratic state. This narrow perception misses the bigger issue related to intrinsic Russian geostrategic interests in that area, and that Iran is an important bulwark against the further expansion of the JEWUSA empire into Russia, with the ultimate goal of dismembering Russia as in the Balkans......."The Grand Chess Board".
With this ultimate hidden Anglo-JEWUSA goal in mind, Russia must as a matter of necessity, re-arm herself without having to explain to the world, in addition to comprehensively equipping Iran not with piecemeal defense contracts here and there, but provide real proper investments into the Iranian military machine, without being apologetic. That such defense agreements between the two countries should not have to be exposed to the whole world in minutiae detail........for example 30 M1 Tors, with 400 missiles for $800 million contract. The nature of military contracts and their actual purpose allows the opponents of Iran/Russia to guess the critical strategy of Iran's defense policy.
America invaded Iraq under false pretenses as almost everybody including prominent people within the USA also know and subsequently in retirement state. Then they occupied the country for 6 years and have killed unofficially 1.2 million people, making 4 million refugees, destroying the country in the process of dividing it into little ethnic based pieces, and now proposing to stay indefinitely so that they can kill a few more million for the Jew.
With Afghanistan again invaded under false pretenses, as many know 9/11 was the act of the Jew and their agents in America, and then the Taliban created by America through the Pakistan military given a false choice of accepting a lie, or be threatened with invasion in 2001. Since the invasion of that country 8 years ago by America, they have created a failed narco state, where the conditions of the country are worse than under the Taliban. Criminal warlords with private militia's essentially control the country, with the result that few criminalized elements in the USA, and UK are enjoying the fruits of the Afghan occupation through the vast 800 a ton a year narcotics trade from Afghanistan. Indeed Russia is a victim of this trade as a substantial amount of this narcotics business ends up in Russia effecting ordinary Russians.
In light of such "criminality" and deception by the USA, UK and their allies there is no need for Russia to constantly declare to the world how bad the USA is, with the same speeches again, again, again, and how "correct" Russia is. I do not propose that Russia should emulate and become like the JEWUSA, that would be disagreeable, but that at a minimum Russia must rearm comprehensively, rearm Iran and adopt a more aggressive posture against the JEWUSA in this theater.............without having to detail what items are being transferred to Iran.
How ironical.
The Soviet Union poured perhaps between $50--100 billion worth of arms into Saddam's Iraq between the 1970's and late 1980's to fight mullah Iran. Thousands of Russian advisers were present in Iraq helping the Iraqi military. The Scuds missiles, the MiG's, the T54/55/62/72 and numerous other arms that created the 1.2 million Iraqi military machine by 1988. How ironical that the Soviet Union poured so much military subsistence, some never to be repaid, into a regime which some allege was headed by a American backed agent....Saddam Hussein, and as many people know certain key men around Saddam were working for the Americans, especially by 2003.
The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan partly as a response to what was happening in Iran again, with the fall of the Shah, and the ascendancy of the mullahs. The Soviet Union spent $300---$800 billion in the Afghan war, sacrificing perhaps up to 20,000 soldiers killed, 40,000 wounded, which added enormous pressure on the already fragile Soviet economy leading to the final meltdown and disintegration of the country in 1991..................ALL partly because of the actions of the Soviet Union around mullah Iran, to contain it from further expanding and spreading its type of religious fundamentalism which was an anathema to the secular Soviet Union, especially in relation to Central Asia and the Caucasus.
How ironical than that the reduced mini-descendant of the Soviet Union, struggling with many internal problems and NATO expansion, is now a 'defender' of the vile evil mullah regime, installed by the UK/USA originally in 1979?
And yet, in reality Russia is NOT really defending the mullah regime, but in actuality defending Iran and her people, when Russia provides over inflated expensive piecemeal defense equipment to that country. This Russia must continue with greater speed and urgency in this matter. They must send more military personnel into Iran to train the Iranians.......it is no good having mountains of arms rusting away in Siberia. That such arms should be put to good use.
How ironical that the Soviet Union expended so much blood and treasure against the mullahs, around Iran, in Iraq and Afghanistan especially, but yet never succeeded in removing the mullahs from power in the first place?
WHY? Stupidity, incompetence of the KGB?
What is the secret of the mullah being in power in Iran for 30 years?
Are they Machiavellian political geniuses? Hardly!
Are they loved by ALL Iranians? Hardly!
Are they ruthless competent effective administrators in Iran? Hardly!
Is Iran in the other side of the world from Russia? Hardly!
Does Russia have no contacts of influence in Iran? Hardly!.....the left in Iran (The Tudeh umbrella organization), the group that opposed the Shah most, the group that sustained the greatest amount of persecution at the hands of SAVAK (very few Islamists were persecuted by SAVAK) and finally the most able and intelligent anti-Shah elements who were very overtly pro-Soviet Union, were defeated by the Mullahs and killed and exiled between 1981-82.
Why? Why couldn't the Soviet Union manipulate the Tudeh to their advantage more effectively to eventually develop an acceptable type of Socialist government in Iran which didn't threaten its neighbors?
Perhaps the 700,00 strong KGB was over rated.
In fact the mullahs are not that smart.....most have basic education by Western standards. So who is guiding them?
The primary source is the UK. Historically the UK has been active in Iran since the 19th century. Through their long experience in the country they have built up considerable local Iranian networks of Mullahs (The British realized early on the importance of mullahs in Iranian society), Bazaari, mafia elements and of course the ruling elite.
1) The British installed Colonel Reza Khan, an illiterate who could neither read or write, and perhaps of Jewish extraction, into power in 1921 from the ranks of the Persian COSSACK BRIGADE.
2) Then the British removed him from power with Soviet help in 1941, and installed his son Reza Shah Pahlavi. Then the British reinstalled him again using the Americans in 1953.
3) Then the British removed him in 1979, and installed the mullahs, using the Americans again. Then the British removed the Americans from Iran with the takeover of the American embassy, giving them an exclusive say in Iranian affairs (52 hostages held for 444 days...correct?).......Almost all American covert ops have been easily compromised inside Iran, though of course in reality America has never been that keen on removing the mullahs from power in Iran.
SO IT IS THE BRITISH WHO SUSTAIN THE MULLAHS IN POWER IN IRAN, CLEARLY.
The French play some part also. If we recall the intensity of travel between Paris and Tehran, of prominent Iranian political figures between 1979--82........and maybe also the Germans.
Why do the British and Europeans like the mullahs? The mullahs have basic education, are stupid, easily manipulated and controlled. The mullahs suppress Iran's natural development and that from the British perspective is good (Competitive male envy). On the other hand an Iranian administration run by educated middle class people would be deemed a 'challenge' to British authority in Iran. To be sure much of the current Iranian cabinet are educated, Ahmedinejad has a "Ph.d" in traffic management and town planning, BUT Iranian democracy is a facade and Ahmedinejad is a mere theatrical front in the reality of the power structure in Iran, which is that a group of Mullahs behind the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei actually run Iran, making the key decisions, and behind them the British. That's it.
The tools of the mullah power are VEVAK, with a staff of about 20,000 officially and a network of informers running into the millions (Stasi East Germany). The 125,000 Revolutionary Guard with the top officer echelon sharing the loot of the nation and some power with the mullahs, increasingly. Finally the sections of the urban poor, and rural population most of whom are not well educated but can be easily manipulated and mobilized by the mullahs using Shia Islamic symbolism and Iranian nationalism.
Threats both psychological and physical, loss of jobs, imprisonment and executions are the routine means by which the Mullahs backed by Britain maintain themselves in power illegally, against the wishes of the vast majority of Iranians. The so called assembly and Presidential elections are clearly rigged to ensure the desired candidates of the mullahs win.....candidates are vetted by the mullah run Guardian Council, which itself is controlled and checked by the Expediency Council, also run by the mullahs. Europe naturally likes to do business with mullah Iran, and is given a soft pass by the European media, and especially the UK media.
There are of course weaknesses in the mullah regime which Russia can utilize to overthrow the current regime in Iran.................this would constitute the second tier policy of Russia with Iran. The first tier policy is giving priority of selling and leasing of the full range of conventional arms to Iran in significant Saddam like quantities.............$50---100 billion over the next few years. the $800 million deal for the sale of 30 M1-Tor with 400 missiles might be good for defending one site in Iran, lets say protecting Bushehr, but if the JEWUSA with Israel want to target anything from 1500 to 2000 targets in Iran, primary military and secondary infrastructure, then that much publicized sale, with over inflated prices is worth nothing, and is ineffective gesture politics for both Russia and Iran.
So what are the weaknesses of the Iranian mullah state?
1) The mullahs are British installed puppets and most Iranians don't like them, especially now after 30 years. Maybe 70% of Iranians don't like them. The mullahs main supporters are the rural population and sections of the urban poor.
2) The mullahs have harmed and killed many innocent Iranians since their ascendancy into power with the help of the British. Not since the Mongol invasion in the 13th century have so many Iranians perished under foreign backed rule. between 2---4 million mostly educated middle class Iranians have in addition elected to live in foreign countries, in exile. Ordinary Iranians who live under and understand the illegitimacy of the mullahs and their threats of force in order to stay in power. Beyond the foreign media, ordinary Iranians understand that they essentially live in a theocratic dictatorship, and the elections of Iran both parliamentary and presidential have no value.....such things merely replaces one set of mullah approved puppets with another set of mullah puppets.
3) The Ordinary Iranians are ashamed and affronted by the routine revolutionary rhetoric of the mullahs which elevates Islamic culture over traditional Iranian values. The daily incantations of religious sacrifices, and other extreme manifestations of Shia Islam, as somehow the norm of the Iranian state....and the essence of the nation, deeply shames ordinary Iranians conscious of their Great nations history and culture.
4) The corruption of the ruling mullah elite, where many mullahs have become millionaires, and the transfer of huge amounts of Iran's assets into foreign accounts in London, Switzerland, the Gulf and other places......juxtaposed with the poverty of ordinary Iranians. Real living standards are now 61% of their 1979 levels for the average Iranian. Food prices are expensive, rent is expensive, fuel is expensive........more so now than before. The ruling mullah elite talk the language of religious observance and peity, but do not apply this rule to themselves.........ordinary Iranians understand and even see this fact before them in such places as Tehran, Ishfahan and the Gulf states.
5) The new generation of Iranians not born during the revolution, and who have no emotional attachment to that event. Their desire for reasonable careers and work, and a future where they can aspire to certain expectations as with many of their age around the world, and the reality and frustration of not meeting these expectations under the mullah Iran British backed system.
6) The bizzare economic system which the mullahs manage in Iran with state owned enterprises, numerous charities and other such uneconomic economic activity based on patronage, corruption and peculiar economic theories centered around the mullahs and their particular whims.
These are all weaknesses that Russia can exploit to remove the mullahs from power, and install a more reasonable administration which is an ally of Russia, and with whom Russia feels more comfortable to work with. Granted that Russia does not have a good track record of installing reasonable men in such countries to the South, in satellite states of the former Soviet Union, and one thinks of Chechnya and other such states where semi-gangster hardmen are preferable to sophisticated educated locals, but that Russia must appreciate that Iran is hardly Chechnya, with a population of 70 million, and a more sophisticated educated leader of the moderate persuasion must lead the country in any post mullah environment, inshallah.
That perhaps this is a better outcome for Iran, Russia, America and Israel, where conflict and the fear of conflict is avoided, with the possible instability in Southern Russia.
