Apr 20, 2012

"al-CIA-duh" is run by Western Intelligence

.
.
.
.
"al-Qaeda" doesn't exist its a huge propaganda hologram, and yet it does exist.

The so called "al-Qaeda" with a network of 5000 members at their peak in 2001, with Osama Bin Laden as their undisputed leader, carrying out terrorist operations around the world including 9/11, with a grand strategic plan, out smarting Western intelligence doesn't exist. This is pure mythology and propaganda.

A rag tag bag of seriously misguided men mostly from Arab countries who have very close relationships with Western intelligence officials trained by them, paid by them as mercenaries certainly does exist....carrying out terrorist/security operations around the world for Western Intelligence as guns for hire, and as a fifth column destabilizing Muslim countries.

Ironically and sadly many Muslim countries such as Pakistan willingly and knowingly participate in this elaborate hoax, because in return they receive money and military hardware from the USA.

In the UK, recruitment of "al-Qaeda" begins at university run by MI-5.....either through the Islamic Society or the banned Hizb ut-Tahrir/ Al-Muhajiroun. There is one MI-5 officer stationed in all 100 university institutions........and that is where I first had my experience of MI-5 officers back in 1986, and noted their presence. The more "promising students" are then directly recruited by MI-5, and given free financial support, career enhancing employment, generous social security benefits and the skills to develop their political careers through mosque and community networking. Many famously or infamously become media stars, and are regular get to go experts on all things related to the immigrant community, and have suspiciously easy access to the corridors of power, on top of the backing they get from the spooks.

Unfortunately due to my Pan-Iranian nationalism since the late seventies (developed at a very early conscious age 12/13), my humanist perspective of the world (civilization means ALL humans moving forward in the world at various speeds through modernization and greater secular education with me since 1996/97), and especially secularism (8/9 age) engendered from my best mentor, my father, MI-5 did not have much luck with me.

This led to frustration on their part and various forms of criminal dirty tricks ensued, which has resulted in me leaving the country consequently; gas from 1998, micro-wave machines from January 1999, and serious criminal slander, eager persuasion of other entities in other countries to follow their good habits.

"Soft tactics" were also tried between 1985--2002 in the UK.......using blond Muslims or English converts to Islam thinking that I was some sort of coconut, extremely attractive girls in the hijab, poverty no money, no career access/success unless I relented to Islam, poor health, LONELINESS----"You are on your own boy", on the other hand overly friendly "Islamist" trying to ingratiate all too obviously, ridicule, shame.........Not ALL students with Muslim names in the UK are targeted by MI-5, but a good deal are.

But within this "War" with MI-5 in the UK, I qualified with a law degree whilst facing much antics and problems at the university, ....and a masters in International law whilst facing MI-5 dirty tricks.....and qualified as a Barrister, whilst facing MI-5 dirty tricks.
Then a teacher.

Alternatively I could have relented, grown a beard and submitted myself to MI-5. Possibly would then have had a promising career and life in the UK, with wife and children (The fact of which one is reminded of regularly) as with so many in ones peer group. But I chose not to.

Clearly many others in the gay faggot spook fraternity for sexual pleasure or career meaning and fulfillment would like me to don a beard, and grasp an AK-47. But I think I will feel silly, and look silly.

Unfortunately those that do submit, allured by money and the connections to state power are then sent by MI-5 for "foreign trips" and direct ops in Pakistan/Afghanistan, the Balkans in the 1990's if I remember correctly, Somalia, Yemen, Libya, Tunisia and now Syria.

Another group, more favored by the CIA is the recruitment of criminals from Muslim countries who work for "al-Qaeda". These criminals, then grow a beard and spout a few verses from the Koran and are then given the training and ops direction by MI-5.

There are about 40 plus Muslim countries. All must fight ANY forms of Political Islam, since it is clear that since the 18th century it has been British colonial, and later American and Israeli policy to use Islamists to destroy Muslim countries, using the fifth column of political Islam.

This was the case of the Muslim League created in India in 1905 by the British.

The Muslim Brotherhood created by the British in 1920's Egypt.

The Mullahs of Iran cultivated by the British/USA since the 1950's.

The Taliban created by the CIA in 1994.

The Somali Islamists created by MI-5/CIA in the 1990's.

The JI of Indonesia created by the CIA in the 1960's.

Hamas created by Israel in the 1970's.

____________________________

Qatada

"Qatada - has been dubbed 'Osama bin Laden's right-hand man in Europe'. (
Preacher Abu Qatada appeal )

According to The Times, Abu Qatada is an MI5 agent:

(Al-Qaeda cleric exposed as an MI5 double agent - World - Times Online )

"One of al-Qaeda's most dangerous figures has been revealed as a double agent working for MI5...

"MI5 agents held meetings with the cleric...

"He disappeared from his family home in West London just before the UK's terror law came into force.

"Indignant French officials accused MI5 of helping the cleric to abscond. While he remained on the run, one intelligence chief in Paris was quoted as saying: “British intelligence is saying they have no idea where he is, but we know where he is and, if we know, I’m quite sure they do.”

"Almost a year later Abu Qatada was found hiding in a flat not far from Scotland Yard."

Apr 17, 2012

The Jew wants more war!

.
.
.
.

Kurt Nimmo at Infowars.com

Israel has responded to word from Istanbul on Saturday that Iran and Western diplomats have decided to continue talks on Iran’s nuclear program.

On Sunday, Channel 10 in Israel “broadcast a detailed report on how Israel will go about attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities in the event that diplomacy and sanctions fail and Israel decides to carry out a military strike,” reports The Times of Israel.

Alon Ben-David of Channel 10 said the attack will not come before the P5+1 talks with Iran that will resume in May following a meeting on Saturday. He said “the coming summer will not only be hot but tense.” Ben-David added that “years of preparations are likely to come to realization” and “the moment of truth is near.”












Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that the P5+1 talks have given Iran a ‘freebie.” He demanded Iran stop all enrichment immediately and dismantle its Qom nuclear facility. “I believe that the world’s greatest practitioner of terrorism must not have the opportunity to develop atomic bombs,” he said prior to a meeting with U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman.

Lieberman is a long time advocate of taking a hardline against Iran. In February, he joined a bipartisan coalition of senators who promised to support an attack on Iran when the country becomes capable of producing nuclear weapons. Iran can now enrich uranium at 20 percent. More than 90 percent enrichment is required to produce a nuclear weapon.

Iran sat down with the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany on Saturday in Istanbul, Turkey. According to an EU representative, diplomats “expect that subsequent meetings will lead to concrete steps towards a comprehensive negotiated solution which restores international confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of the Iranian nuclear program.”


During the talks, Iran demanded a promise from the West that it will not be attacked.

“While the atmosphere today was positive and good enough to merit a second round, we continue to stress … that there is urgency for concrete progress and that the window for a diplomatic resolution is closing,” said a senior U.S. official on Saturday.

During the meeting, Chief Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili said his country will not accept a demand that it close down plants which enrich uranium to 20 percent fissile material. Despite this, diplomats say the meeting represents significant progress following months of stalemate on the issue.

Iran states it has a legal right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes under the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty, or NPT, and further says that it “has constantly complied with its obligations under the NPT and the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency.”

Iran has allowed IAEA inspectors into Iran for on the spot inspections, with zero notice of ALL possible sites since 2003, for the last 9 years, which have failed to conclusively find ANY evidence of nuclear bomb making intentions.

The United States believes Iran violated NPT safeguards obligations and cites circumstantial evidence that Iran’s enrichment program was for weapons purposes and therefore violated Iran’s nonproliferation obligations.

In 2007, U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Iran had stopped its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

American intelligence have intimated that they would know in advance, if Iran were on the path to making nuclear bombs through the extensive IAEA inspection mechanism which covertly works with USA intelligence; through satellite monitoring, and through on the ground Humit ops and the training of MEK members in the USA.

Operation Mockingbird Clown with mustachio fronting for failing empire and the Jew drug barons

.
.
.
.
The Taliban were created by the CIA in 1994, using their Pakistani ISI local gofers and Gulf oil mischief funds.......a la "al-CIA-duh" of the Arab Spring in Libya, Tunisia and Syria more recently.

In internet jargon they are what we term "Controlled Opposition".......the presence of the Taliban somehow tenuously justifies the JEWSA's presence in Afghanistan, so that the JEWSA can harvest the opium for the Jew Wall Street Bankers...and that's it.

For 11 years the Taliban has performed poorly in the battle field given that they lack heavy equipment (Ak-47, RPG's VS State of the art NATO/USA equipment), proper training, organization, logistics, planning, modern tactics and trained commanders.....and the ISI, their not so covert masters has not given them any aircover.....SAMs and light SAMs even.

However given that the Taliban is largely an ethnic based group representing Pashtuns who have traditionally dominated Afghanistan for 300 years, the Taliban provides aggrieved young Pashtun men a genuine channel through which they can vent their anger at the foreign occupation of their homeland, Afghanistan.

On the other hand since the Taliban is a "Controlled Opposition" it must play its part in the theater of Afghanistan set by the CIA......and that means attacking Kabul now and then to remind the everybody what a noble role the USA is playing on behalf of the world in that wretched country......so manipulated for 30 odd years by the CIA/ISI into war and destruction.

The recent Taliban attack around the country was probably a false flag attack. If it was a genuine nationalist attack by true local liberators, then they would NOT have attacked Russian and German targets.......and other civilian targets, but instead would have focused on the USA, the main actor in this tragedy.

__________________________________

Geraldo Rivera trying to steer the conversation in Afghanistan, calls Taliban a ‘jerk-off’

Patrick Henningsen at Infowars.com

If one man ever embodied all that is wrong with the mainstream media’s failing propaganda outlets, it’s Geraldo Rivera.

Presently, he’s masquerading as a journalist in Afghanistan, earning his salary as the media’s ultimate weapon of mass distraction.

Following yesterday’s Taliban offensive where a number of Afghanistan’s urban areas were hit in a coordinated paramilitary attack, FOX News aired its tenuous program entitled “Geraldo at Large”.

The tough-talking embedded reporter Rivera admitted that he didn’t see any of the action because (he claimed) he was helplessly locked inside the US embassy when the Taliban offensive took place.

When the smoke finally cleared, and it was safe to come out, FOX’s brave journalist emerged, this time on camera with an Afghan translator who was allegedly phoning a Taliban fighter for some post-attack commentary.

This is a spook media stunt

Rivera started in with, “Ask him how it feels to get his ass kicked…”

When the Taliban on the phone replied, Geraldo promptly interrupted him, ironically telling his FOX viewers not to listen because, “… it’s propaganda”.

A model of journalistic integrity, Geraldo finished off his segment with gusto by pretending to shout-down the Taliban through the phone, effectively calling them out from a safe distance:

You jerk-off… what did you win?!”

“You killed no Americans…”

After being dumped by ABC and NBC, Rivera eventually landed his current position at the MSM’s dying flagship FOX News.

Rivera’s reporting in Afghanistan has since reached new lows from yesterday’s Taliban outburst – but not as low as previous reporting where he worked as a vacant apologist for the heroin trade in Central Asia.

Pentagon Spokesman Captain John Kirby also went on to write off the attack, saying, ”I don’t believe they succeeded.”

At no point during FOX and other US television mainstream media reporting on yesterday’s coordinated nation-wide Taliban attack did TV news reporters mention the US military slaughter of 18 innocent Afghan villagers that took place in Kandahar only a few short weeks ago. It was because of this very massacre that the Taliban mounted their latest ‘Spring Offensive’.

This is a prime example of how the US media is able to erase the past, training their viewers not to think in terms of cause and effect, but only to see events as they are presented on the TV news conveyor belt managed by media cartel members FOX, NBC, ABC, CBS, and CNN.

Latest talking point: “Haqqani Network”

FOX pundits continued to shape their audience’s newly scripted reality in Afghanistan explaining, “This attack bares all the halmarks of the Haqqani Network“. Sound familiar? “Bares all the hallmarks of… (fill in the blanks).

The U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, Ryan Crocker, also repeated the Pentagon’s latest talking point, explaining in an interview with CNN’s ‘‘State of the Union” program, that he also believed the attacks were carried out by the evil Haqqani.

As the alleged Taliban faction, labeled as the “Haqqani”, are supposedly based in Pakistan, the Pentagon’s new terror network allows the Washington to ramp-up their tough talk with Pakistan, as well as step-up drone attacks over the Afghan border.

Geraldo Rivera helped promote the US military’s protection of the Afghan heroin supply "business"

Under the Taliban, pre-2001 opium production was down to almost zero.

After the U.S. and UK forces invaded, however, production picked-up exponentially from around 700 tons in 2001, to about 8,000 tons in 2008, generating a black market profit in the region of $500 billion.

("For heroin the wholesale price for a kilogram in Britain was typically $US29,569, in America $US71,200, and in Australia a whopping $US221,304." The price of heroin depends on the country.....Iran, Pakistan, India, Central Asia, Ukraine, Russia, Europe or North America....courtesy of the Pentagon and their local criminal links.

One of the main reasons it is so cheap in the UK is because the British military working with the British police have been successful in flooding and controlling the flow of heroin into the UK, where the profits are laundered in the Jew banks of the "The City" in London and goes back to habits cultivated from the days of the East India Company, and the cultivation of Opium in India for the Chinese market. But do not expect any real focus or expose of the harm Afghan heroin does to millions of British people......either from the British government or the British media.

If a NATO member government has some feeling and a sense of responsibility for their people, all they have to do to curtail the menace of heroin from Afghanistan is withdraw their troops and their spooks...and they will mysteriously discover the flow of heroin suddenly declines in their country (2 + 2= 4).

Heroin cultivated by the Pentagon is a REAL MENACE that harms millions of people worldwide as a pose to the manufactured booga booga of the Taliban and "al-CIA-duh". Then it is about making REAL CHOICES around REAL ISSUES.

Patrick Henningsen otherwise excellent analysis I think exaggerates the claim of the retail value of Afghan heroin....maybe to push home a point...8000 tons x 1000 kilograms x $50,000 median street retail value around the world = $400,000,000,000.

I suppose with such profits for the Jew banker, why bother making cars, TV, or anything else......this is all easy money, and its all very smart and cunning isn't it?)

Few can rightly argue that: there does not exists a genuine link between the War on Terror and the War on Drugs.

Regarding the opium crops, instead of looking deeper than the Pentagon party line, Geraldo Rivera did just the opposite – as he ran cover for the US military’s involvement in the Afghan drugs industry.

U.S. Army soldiers guard the poppy fields in Afghanistan, in turn,

assisting the banks who launder billions and support drug lords like Whalid Karzai who maintain control of their business there.

Watch Geraldo in this shocking FOX clip from the Afghan poppy fields:

….

Apr 16, 2012

Free Scotland

.
.
.
.

(Skint? Us? Think again Engloaned)

On 14 April 2012, The Economist produced an article, about independence for Scotland, which contains a lot of useful factual information.

According to the article (The Scottish play):

1. "Scotland could probably go it alone now".

2. In 2010-11 Scotland produced about 10% of Britain's GDP.

Yet it has only 8.4% of Britain's population.

Website for this image

3. The export value of Scotch whisky rose by 71% between 2006 and 2011 to £4.23 billion ($6.72 billion).

Over the same period food exports have risen by a similarly impressive 65%. (Could luxury exports help finance independence? )

Oil revenues, in 2010-11, amounted to £8.8 billion.

In 2010-11 Scotland’s GDP was £145 billion.

After  the Game
Scotland by indigo_girl

4. "North Sea oil and gas would have made Scotland rich ... Declassified documents show that, in the 1970s, Treasury officials reckoned Scotland could comfortably have paid its own way."

Oil and gas prices are soaring.

The average oil price was $62 a barrel in 2009; in 2011 it was $111.

A ... bet for continued growth is oil services. There is already a thriving hub of technical firms around Aberdeen.

Alex Salmond in the USA

Of course, The Economist article contains a lot of spin.

It tries to tell us that SMALL countries are VULNERABLE.

The Economist does not mention that Ireland and Iceland, in spite of their banking difficulties, are still today much richer than Britain.

And, it is the small countries that are still the richest in the world:

Luxembourg (which has no oil)

Singapore (which has no oil)

Norway

Qatar

Macau

Liechtenstein

Bermuda

Our main worry is that AN 'INDEPENDENT' SCOTLAND WOULD NOT BE INDEPENDENT.

Young Piper
Scotland by cessna152towser

"Alex Salmond rightly points out, Britain is hardly in surplus right now - for every £6 Osborne (UK economics minister) spends, he has to scrounge £1 from the international debt markets...

"So now is not a good time for London politicians to say that a country which can’t balance its books is not a viable country.

"The UK has not balanced its books for ten years now, and probably won’t for most of this decade."

The right-wing London based 'Spectator' magazine admits that an independent Scotland could pay its own way


On 15 April 2012, in The Herald, columnist Iain Macwhirter comments on The Economist's recent article on independence for Scotland.

(Skint? Us? Think again Engloaned)

Macwhirter points out:

1. "Scotland would be one of the six wealthiest countries in the world if it became independent tomorrow."

2. The Economist dismissed oil as a spent resource.

But, "there is still 40% of the black stuff under the North Sea worth at least £1 trillion.

"Scotland's oil and gas industry is set to generate a revenue stream of £379 billion, according to Price Waterhouse Cooper's analysis in November 2011."

3. Scotland has "25% of Europe's offshore wind and tidal energy potential."

4. Scotland has five of the world's top universities, more than much larger countries like France.

Scotland produces more graduates per head than any country in Europe.

5. Tourism and whiskey exports bring in more than £8bn a year.

"Even the financial services sector is still pulling in cash."

Despite the banking crash.

Apr 14, 2012

An old former insider imparting wisdom

.
.
.
.
Washington Leads World Into Lawlessness

By Paul Craig Roberts at Information Clearing House.

The US government pretends to live under the rule of law, to respect human rights, and to provide freedom and democracy to citizens. Washington’s pretense and the stark reality are diametrically opposed.

Obviously

US government officials routinely criticize other governments for being undemocratic and for violating human rights. Yet, no other country except Israel sends bombs, missiles, and drones into sovereign countries to murder civilian populations. The torture prisons of Abu Gahraib, Guantanamo, and CIA secret rendition sites are the contributions of the Bush/Obama regimes to human rights.

Washington violates the human rights of its own citizens. Washington has suspended the civil liberties guaranteed in the US Constitution and declared its intention to detain US citizens indefinitely without due process of law. President Obama has announced that he, at his discretion, can murder US citizens whom he regards as a threat to the US.

Congress did not respond to these extraordinary announcements with impeachment proceedings. There was no uproar from the federal courts, law schools, or bar associations. Glenn Greenwald reports that the Department of Homeland Security harasses journalists who refuse to be presstitutes, and we have seen videos of the brutal police oppression of peaceful OWS protestors. Chris Floyd describes the torture-perverts who rule the US.

Could we say that this is an empire in absolute decline, and that the deviant few have taken over?

Now Washington is forcing as much of the world as it can to overthrow international treaties and international law.

Unfortunately certain criminal groups feel lowering the threshold of law enables their agenda to be more greatly promoted, because they have the means, resources, organization, cunning, pre-knowledge of manufactured crisis's to put themselves in a better position within a host country. Carpet beggars in a grand scale. We note that in Turkey the Doenme Jews became ascendant in Turkey during the Young Turks Movement, and their consequent involvement in WWI, a war that killed 25% of the population, but allowed the Doenme Jews to become the dominant economic group in the country to this day, and the state structure. Prior to 1915 the Armenians were the dominant economic group in the Ottoman empire. Ditto in Imperial Russia, Imperial Germany......and now in Imperial USA which is unnecessarily focused on endless wars for Israel.

Washington has issued a ukase that its word alone is international law.

(It isn't and it shouldn't be.......but we will see how significant countries around the world comply with Washington's imperial edicts. If these significant countries comply meekly, then Imperial Washington will issue further imperial edicts...........like its imperial wars edicts from Washington no matter how illogical will never cease)

Any country, except those who receive Washington’s dispensation, that engages in trade with Iran or purchases Iran’s oil will be sanctioned by the US. These countries will be cut off from US markets, and their banking systems will not be able to use banks that process international payments. In other words, Washington’s “sanctions against Iran” apply not to Iran but to countries that defy Washington and meet their energy needs with Iranian oil.


According to the Christian Science Monitor, so far Washington has granted special privileges to Japan and 10 European Union countries to continue purchasing Iranian oil. Requiring countries to shutdown their economies in order to comply with Washington’s vendetta against Iran, a vendetta that has been ongoing ever since the Iranians overthrew the Washington-installed puppet, the Shah of Iran, more than three decades ago, was more than Washington could get away with. Washington has permitted Japan to keep importing between 78-85% of its normal oil imports from Iran.

Unfortunately that is not the case. The mullahs were cultivated by the CIA in the 1950's, and used against the democratically elected Mossaddeq government in 1953, and once the International Jews judged that their puppet the Shah had to go, they replaced him with another set of puppets cultivated since the 1950's........ the mullahs......who incidentally had no prior political experience, and did not lose one single member during the so called Islamic Revolution of 1979.........BUT somehow managed to overcome one of the most ruthless intelligence agencies, and come to power eventually, and rule the country for 33 years hence.

The International Jews needed to create artificial enemies, boogies for Israel, so that the USA can save little Israel from these artificially created enemies later.......and destroy such societies in the process of saving Israel........hence "al-CIA-duh" ascendant in Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and Syria.........openly backed by the USA/NATO. And of course America's performance in Iraq, and Afghanistan......simply appalling.
The USA was not in Iraq to liberate, and build...but to destroy for Israel.

Washington’s dispensations, however, are arbitrary. Dispensations have not been granted to China, India, Turkey, and South Korea. India and China are the largest importers of Iranian oil, and Turkey and South Korea are among the top ten importers. Before looking at possible unintended consequences of Washington’s vendetta against Iran, what is Washington’s case against Iran?

ZERO

Frankly, Washington has no case. It is the hoax of “weapons of mass destruction” all over again. Iran, unlike Israel, signed the non-proliferation treaty. All countries that sign the treaty have the right to nuclear energy. Washington claims that Iran is violating the treaty by developing a nuclear weapon. There is no evidence whatsoever for Washington’s assertion. Washington’s own 16 intelligence agencies are unanimous that Iran has had no nuclear weapon’s program since 2003. Moreover, the International Atomic Energy Agency’s weapons inspectors are in Iran and have reported consistently that there is no diversion of nuclear material from the energy program to a weapons program.

On the rare occasion when Washington is reminded of the facts, Washington makes a different case. Washington asserts that Iran’s rights under the non-proliferation treaty notwithstanding, Iran cannot have a nuclear energy program, because Iran would then have learned enough to be able at some future time to make a bomb.

The world’s hegemon has unilaterally decided that the possibility that Iran might one day decide to make a nuke is too great a risk to take.

It is better, Washington says,

to drive up the oil price,

disrupt the world economy,

violate international law,

and risk a major war than to have to worry that a future Iranian government will make a nuclear weapon.

This is the Jeremy Bentham tyrannical approach to law that was repudiated by the Anglo-American legal system.


The USA/UK have a Jewish led legal system.......there is very little Anglo-Saxon about it.

It is difficult to characterize Washington’s position as one of good judgment. Moreover, Washington has never explained the huge risk Washington sees in the possibility of an Iranian nuke. Why is this risk so much greater than the risk associated with Soviet nukes or with the nukes of the US, Russia, China, Israel, Pakistan, India, and North Korea today?

Iran is a relatively small country. It does not have Washington’s world hegemonic ambitions. Unlike Washington, Iran is not at war with a half dozen countries.

Why is Washington destroying America’s reputation as a country that respects law and risking a major war and economic dislocation over some possible future development, the probability of which is unknown?


There is no good answer to this question. Lacking evidence for a case against Iran, Washington and Israel have substituted demonization. The lie has been established as truth that the current president of Iran intends to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.

This lie has succeeded as propaganda even though numerous language experts have proven that the intention attributed to the Iranian president by American-Israeli propaganda is a gross mistranslation of what the president of Iran said. Once again, for Washington and its presstitutes, facts do not count. The agenda is all that counts, and any lie will be used to advance the agenda.

Washington’s sanctions could end up biting Washington harder than they bite Iran.
What will Washington do if India, China, Turkey and South Korea do not succumb to Washington’s threats?

According to recent news reports, India and China are not inclined to inconvenience themselves and to harm their economic development in order to support Washington’s vendetta against Iran. Having watched China’s rapid rise and having observed North Korea’s immunity to American attack, South Korea might be wondering how much longer it intends to remain Washington’s puppet state.

South Korea is the USA's puppet state, and this is reinforced by the present center-right government of
Lee Myung-bak. A relationship borne from WWII, and the Korean war which created a climate of dependency on the USA, based on Cold War geo-politics. The previous government under Roh Moo-hyun attempted to become more independent of the USA, but they have lost the last two elections. The USA through law and bilateral treaties controls the Korean military, modeled and armed by the USA, and the intelligence agencies. Koreans play baseball, and copy a good deal of American culture, and host 37,000 American servicemen.

However clearly whatever shade of politics Korean governments have there is always a need to show to the highly educated Korean public that their governments formulate policies which put the country first, second and last.......and are not based on the wishes of shadowy Wall street, criminalized, failing puppet masters.

3 + White T-shirt + pot ready to eat noodles?


Turkey, where the civilian and somewhat Islamist government has managed to become independent of the US- controlled Turkish military, appears to be slowly coming to the realization that Washington and NATO have Turkey in a “service role” in which Turkey is Washington’s agent against its own kind. The Turkish government appears to be reassessing the benefits of being Washington’s pawn.


Beg to disagree......that is poor analysis. Turkey continues to be a friend of Israel and the USA, no matter the short sound bites and rhetoric. Turkey has played a leading role and IS playing a leading role in enabling the so-called Arab Spring...where "al-CIA-duh" eventually comes to power in Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and if Turkey can initiate a border war using NATO muscle and backup, in Syria. Turkey is in Afghanistan harvesting the heroin for the Jewish banks of London and New York, along with the USA and UK. Turkey is however trying to play the "good cop" with mullah Iran so as to channel the country along the path desired by the USA......IF not Israel.

What Turkey and South Korea decide is basically a decision whether the countries will be independent countries or be subsumed within Washington’s empire. The success of the American-Israeli assault on Iran’s independence depends on India and China.

If India and China give the bird to Washington, what can Washington do? Absolutely nothing. What if Washington, drowning in its gigantic hubris, announced sanctions against India and China?

Wal-Mart’s shelves would be empty, and America’s largest retailer would be hammering on the White House door.

Apple Computer and innumerable powerful US corporations, which have off-shored their production for the American market to China, would see their profits evaporate. Together with their Wall Street allies, these powerful corporations would assault the fool in the White House with more force than the Red Army. The Chinese trade surplus would cease to flow into US Treasury debt. The off-shored-to-India back office operations of banks, credit card companies, and customer service departments of utilities throughout the US would cease to function.

In America, chaos would reign. Such are the rewards to the Empire of globalism.

The White House moron and the neoconservative and Israeli warmongers who urge him on to more wars do not understand that the US is no longer an independent country.

America is owned by off-shoring corporations and the foreign countries in which the corporations have located their production for US markets. Sanctions on China and India (and South Korea) mean sanctions on US corporations. Sanctions on Turkey mean sanctions on a NATO ally.


Do China, India, South Korea and Turkey realize that they hold the winning cards?

Do they understand that they can give the bird to the American Empire and bring it down in collapse, or are they brainwashed like Europe and the rest of the world that the powerful Americans cannot be resisted?


Will China and India exercise their power over the US, or will the two countries fudge the issue and adopt a pose that saves face for Washington while they continue to purchase Iranian oil?

The answer to this question is: how much will Washington pay China and India in secret concessions, such as eviction of the US from the South China Sea, for their pretense that China and India acknowledge Washington’s dictatorial powers over the rest of the world?

Without concession to China and India, Washington is likely to be ignored while it watches its power evaporate. A country that cannot produce industrial and manufactured goods, but can only print debt instruments and money is not a powerful country. It is a washed-up two-bit punk that can continue to strut around until the proverbial boy says: “the Emperor has no clothes”.

Update:
China is responding to the sanctions by taking advantage of the drop in demand for Iranian oil to negotiate lower prices for its purchases. The result of Washington’s sanctions on Iran is to lower the cost of energy for China and to raise it for everyone else.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. www.paulcraigroberts.org

Apr 13, 2012

Worthless Amnesty International

.
.
.
.
In the days of innocence in the 1970's and 1980's one saw Dame Judi Dench and the like talk about the rights of so and so and the abuse of the poor individual met at the hands of some greasy distant Third World countries.....presented in Sunday church hall solemnity, and dignity.

But as time has passed, and one has experienced the criminal UK State in its unmasked true self, beyond the fine manners, cricket, fair play, justice, the sanctimonious bullshit, the facts and truth one really deep down didn't want to know about, but came across by chance anyway.....about the criminal UK state, came up...gradually, slowly....initially dismissed, but slowly accepted.

It works a bit like that with the London based and founded Amnesty International.

I visited them in 1998 in their London office, desperately looking for some kind of answer, a logical rationale for ones strange predicament. I was met by a European sounding lady, stone faced with a distinctly sharp sarcastic tone........no smile, no welcome...just a series of nods. Not the warm, caring, sympathetic perspective I had of them from younger days (My catharsis blogging started 10 years later, so that I could talk to myself at least and get for myself the answers for myself).

I next met an Amnesty International official in 2009 in Asia, Bangkok. This time it was an English gentleman in his 50's. He was from my point of view worse than the Continental lady in the first encounter 10 years earlier. Being Asian growing up in the UK it is not uncommon meeting local ladies who are a bit "stone faced with a distinctly sharp sarcastic tone........no smile, no welcome...just a series of nods"....when you go to a pub, bar, supermarket, school, university, library, the bus, the train or any other place. This one was positively sweaty (face and clothes), angst ridden, not calm.......and aggressively quizzical.....parting company with a series of very bad advice. He after all had to remember his lines from the Criminal UK State. The second encounter lasted longer, and felt worse than the first short curt one.

Suffice to say the article below by a real talented journalist did things for me......it answered questions that needed to be answered.

Thank you Tony Cartalucci.


_________________________________


Tony Cartalucci at Infowars.com

The Amnesty International “infographic” titled, “Shocking Facts About Who’s Arming Human Rights Abusers,” portraying Russia’s arming of Syria as “fueling the most bloodshed” is not “shocking” at all when one realizes the disingenuous human rights advocacy organization is run by US State Department officials and is funded by convicted criminal George Soros‘ Open Society Institute (annual report page 8) as well as the UK Department for International Development (page 8), the European Commission, and other corporate-funded foundations. The “infographic,” in this context, clearly becomes a case of shameless, politically motivated propaganda using the Amnesty International “brand” to give it the legitimacy its increasingly distrusted sponsors lack.

arms trade infographic

Image: Amnesty International’s “infographic” aimed at the lowest possible intellectual denominator in their target audience. While Syria might be the biggest enemy of the US currently, it is by no means the greatest human rights violator – Ugandan “president-for-life” Museveni displaces entire populations of tens of thousands of people in single US-British land grabs and has led regional military campaigns that have killed millions – yet he receives millions in military aid and arms from the West. Such hypocrisy reveals Amnesty International as the politically-motivated front it ultimately is. (click here to enlarge)

….

The graphic is so inaccurate, so full of such overt, easily refuted lies, it must be aimed at the most ignorant, impressionable members of Western society. It also contains glaring inexplicable hypocrisy. For instance, while Russia defends its arming of Syria’s government by citingdocumented evidence that the unrest is being fomented by foreign-funded, well armed terrorists committing a multitude of atrocities, even according to Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International’s sister organization, what imaginable excuse could France, Germany, the US, or the UK have for arming Syria, Bahrain, Yemen, or Libya past or present – especially when these same nations have justified the total summation of their foreign meddling and military interventionism with acting upon “humanitarian concerns?”

The next glaring deception comes from Amnesty International’s “Human Cost” tally. Amnesty cites themselves as the source for the tallies, admitting that they have no accurate information regarding Libya or whether or not the tally includes the thousands upon thousands killed in NATO’s onslaught or during the genocidal orgy carried out by NATO-armed and backed Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) terrorists. It should be noted that NATO’s Libyan legion of terror is still to this day carrying out systematic atrocities (also covered here).

One assumes that Amnesty International’s tally for Syria comes either from the UN’s already discredited tally, or Amnesty International’s own tally taken from London-based foreign-funded NGO’s working out of the British Foreign Ministry’s office who are basing their tallies on hearsay and overt fabrications.

The UN number was likewise based on hearsay, taken from opposition members in Geneva and compiled by Fortune 500 think-tank director, Karen Koning AbuZayd. AbuZayd sits on theWashington D.C. based Middle East Policy Council, along side current and former associates of Exxon, the US military, the CIA, the Saudi Binladin Group, the US-Qatari Business Council and both former and current members of the US government. Clearly, by representing the very interests who have been trying to reorder the Arab World for their own convenience for decades, AbuZayd’s involvement compromises the entire UN report as well as the credibility of the UN itself.


Image: Amnesty International using the same “activism 2.0″ gags employed by their junior partners at Invisible Children, the perpetrators of the Kony 2012 scam. Note the “Donate Now: Fight bad guys with every dollar,” and how like Invisible Children, Amnesty addresses its audience as if they are children – a tried and true method employed by propagandists. Ironically, Amnesty and Invisible Children also both so happen to cultivate a myriad of connections with the US State Department and corporate interests.

But perhaps what is most offensive of all, is not the intelligence-insulting lies told by Amnesty International, but rather the information they failed to include in their “infographic.” This includes information like the 60-billion dollar arms deal the US signed with notorious human rights abuser Saudi Arabia - the largest arms deal in US history – and the billions upon endless billions of dollars sent to the Israeli government to maintain its belligerent regional posture as well as maintain their nation-sized concentration camp, sometimes called “Palestine.”

At best, the only difference between Russia’s arming the legitimate government of Syria, and the US arming Libyan terrorists, Saudi despots, and Israeli megalomaniacs is clever Western propaganda used to mischaracterize each instance, justifying it when it suits the West, and demonizing it when arms dealing works against them. At worst, the difference is in fact that Russia is arming standing governments while the US and its NATO-Arab League partners are veritably arming notorious terrorist organizations, many listed on both British and US government lists of “foreign terrorist organizations.” This includes the Iraqi-IranianMujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK), the aforementioned LIFG, and Baluchi terrorists on the Iranian-Pakistani border.

The purpose of this arming of terrorists is to do exactly what Amnesty International accuses Russia of doing, fueling bloodshed. In fact, as the West demanded Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad to withdraw troops from Syrian cities according to a UN brokered “peace plan,” the West’s proxy rebels openly denounced the deal and promised to fight on. Instead of berating the rebels, the West along with their Arab League partners pledged cash and weapons to the rebels encouraging them to flaunt the “peace deal” and indeed perpetuate the bloodshed.

And this is only the latest in a long series of politically-motivated stunts pulled by Amnesty International specifically targeting both Russia and Syria. Whatever credibility Amnesty International might have had left after its participation in the destruction of Libya and indeed its own “fueling of bloodshed” in North Africa, it has completely buried under the battlefields of Syria.

This article is re-posted from Tony Cartalucci’s blog, Land Destroyer Report.

Parliament representing the reasonable, just wishes and desires of the ordinary majority

.
.
.
.

In Pakistan the USA exerts control of the country through the Punjab military, and the corrupt political dynasties.

The USA control of the country is not for any good purpose. It has never been.

Pakistan is now a Failed State, and the USA, along with the Punjab military is a major factor for this failure after 65 years of independence. The same in Indonesia, and the Philippines and many other Third World countries.


When the USA develops a relationship with the military of a Third World country, over time the nature of this relationship becomes criminalized, corruptive, secretive and ultimately detrimental to the interests of the people within the object Third World country.

India and Bangladesh must be aware of this fact. It is all too easy for the weak to admire the strong.

In Pakistan's case through the natural course of time and experience, both the Punjab military and the elite political dynasties are no longer respected BY THE PEOPLE.

So others try and fill this void, such as the parliamentarians, the Supreme Court, or Imran Khan.

____________________________

Pakistan Calls for End to US Interventionism

Drone strikes, troop incursions, and supply routes for NATO, among other things, must stop

by John Glaser at antiwar.com

The Pakistani parliament on Thursday unanimously declared that the U.S. must immediately stop violating its sovereignty, including through drone strikes.

The Guidelines for Revised Terms of Engagement with USA/NATO/ISAF states that the “U.S. footprint in Pakistan must be reviewed,” and demanded “an immediate cessation of drone attacks inside the territorial borders of Pakistan,” an immediate stop to all military incursions into Pakistani territory for any reason, and a prohibition on using Pakistani territory or airspace to supply NATO troops in Afghanistan.

Pakistan has been saying as much for months, especially after U.S. warplanes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers at an outpost in the Mohmand Agency last November. Supply routes to NATO troops in Afghanistan have been closed to the U.S. since then and, even though the Obama administration restarted the drone program in January, Islamabad has consistently condemned them as “unlawful.”

The decade-long war in Afghanistan has terribly destabilized Pakistan and the Obama administration’s drone program – the institutionalization of extra-judicial execution and mass murder of innocent men, women, and children – has caused immense suffering and resentment. The parliament’s declaration is therefore unsurprising.

The statement comes as Washington struggles desperately to negotiate an end to the useless war in Afghanistan. But Pakistan’s interests in Afghanistan have run counter to Washington’s since the beginning of the war. With the inevitable U.S. defeat and the impending withdrawal of combat troops in 2014, Pakistan can be expected to support Taliban sway in Afghanistan to counter the influence of its archenemy, India.

Pakistan’s new stay-out-of-our-affairs declaration is frankly a long time coming. And the political entanglements of the region are an indication of how remote Afghanistan and Pakistan are to U.S. interests and what a massive waste the last decade of murderous and misguided engagement in the area has been.

The Jewish International Conspiracy against Western children

.
.
.
.
It is a lot easier when others do the work for you.

I do not want to add anything here, save for the fact that I was brought up in the UK where I spent thirty years, and was family wise intrinsically connected to the education system of the country.

The education system has gone downhill substantially, whilst simultaneously the behavior of students has also gone down in equal measure in the UK, seemly encouraged and directed by the Jew run governments of the UK.

The Westerner is made up of many different people from Stone age people, to Celts, Latins, Slavs and Indo-Europeans. I do not say that they are anointed to lead the world in all things at all times ad infinitem. However there is a perceptive "effort" to downgrade the Western child at many levels.

This is unnatural.


_____________________________

WHITE TEENAGERS GETTING DUMBER by aangirfan





Highest IQ - dark blue. Lowest IQ - dark red.
(IQ and the Wealth of Nations - Wikipedia)

On 21 March 2012, we learn that, according to recent research, the average IQ is falling in Britain, Norway, Denmark and beyond.

(Prospect Magazine / British middle-class teenagers - lower IQ scores - Daily Mail)

Our own observation is that about 50% of white middle class and white upper class parents are neglecting their teenage children.

Mr and Mrs White British are busy arranging their divorces.

They are busy partying.

Their teens are sometimes being left in the care of the computer, the local gang or foreign au pairs.

The best teachers have usually fled from the state run schools, because of the lack of discipline.

Website for this image

In the UK, Chinese and Indian pupils gain more top grades than white British children in every school subject, official figures have revealed.

(Chinese and Indian pupils get more top grades at than white British.)

In the USA, Asian Americans perform better than European Americans (Education outcomes in the United States.)

Africa reportedly has the widest range of IQs, having some of the highest and some of the lowest IQs.

According to Professor Philip Adey of King’s College London, a child's IQ can be raised by the right stimulation

"All of the recent evidence points to the plasticity of general intelligence, the fact that a child’s IQ can be raised by the right kind of stimulation."


Website for this image

According to Prospect Magazine:

1. IQ testing is controversial and regarded by some as only a rough indicator of ability or potential.

2. But, there is a strong association between a nation's IQ and its prosperity and health.

3. A study in 2009 compared IQ scores obtained by British teenagers in 1980 and 200.

The average IQ had declined by as much as six points among teenagers in the top half of the IQ scale, a group typically dominated by the children of middle-class families.

This fall wiped out the previous two decades of gains in that group.

A 2005 study on a sample of 500,000 young Danish men, tested between 1959 and 2004, showing that performance peaked in the late 1990s but then declined to pre-1991 levels.

4. In 2002, the psychologist Richard Flynn and political scientist Tatu Vanhanen wrote IQ and the Wealth of Nations which suggested that a nation’s economic success was strongly correlated with its average IQ.

According to the Flynn argument, a six-point decline in IQ would equate with a 0.3 per cent fall in GDP.

5. Suggested causes of the fall in IQ are:

The internet

The dumbing down of education

An obsession with exam results

Youth culture.


On 8 February 2009, the Daily Mail reported:

Teenagers use their leisure time to watch TV or play computer games instead of reading or conversing with others

Education experts said a growing tendency in schools to 'teach to the test' was affecting youngsters' ability to think laterally.

Professor James Flynn, of the University of Otago in New Zealand, commented: 'It looks like there is something screwy among British teenagers.'

Previous studies have claimed that using text messages and email can temporarily reduce IQ.

Smoking marijuana has also been linked with a decline in IQ.

Dr Richard House, a senior lecturer in therapeutic education at Roehampton University and a researcher into the effects of television on children, said: 'Computer games and computer culture has led to a decrease in reading books. The tendency for teachers to now 'teach to the test' has also led to a decrease in the capacity to think in lateral ways.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1139062/British-teenagers-lower-IQ-scores-generation-ago-new-study-reveals.html#ixzz1rdJ6CJAA